[Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

Thu Oct 15 16:59:45 EDT 2015

Papers with authors from both countries will be counted for both columns.

Best,
Jeroen

[101-innovations-icon-very-small]  101 innovations: tools database<http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list> | survey<https://101innovations.wordpress.com/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeroen Bosman, faculty liaison for the Faculty of Geosciences
Utrecht University Library<http://www.uu.nl/library>
email: j.bosman at uu.nl<mailto:j.bosman at uu.nl>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trees say printing is a thing of the past

From: SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Pamela Sieving
Sent: donderdag 15 oktober 2015 19:44
To: Yuling Tan
Cc: SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
Subject: Re: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

Does anyone know how the determination was made to include articles in one column or the other?  What happens with articles by authors in both China and the US?

Pam Sieving

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Yuling Tan <tanyuling2007 at gmail.com<mailto:tanyuling2007 at gmail.com>> wrote:
yes, this is a still growing trend!

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Pikas, Christina K. <Christina.Pikas at jhuapl.edu<mailto:Christina.Pikas at jhuapl.edu>> wrote:
I don’t know if anyone has mentioned it, but there has been a concerted effort to add more Chinese content to both WoS and Scopus in the past few years. Perhaps using CNKI for China would be better?  But then what would you use for the US?

From: SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org<mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org>] On Behalf Of Bosman, J.M. (Jeroen)
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 12:28 PM
To: 'SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org<mailto:SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org>'
Subject: Re: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

This is a simple count by Scopus limited to articles and reviews. It includes all papers with at least one author from the USA or China. So yes, still growing, also relatively. But no, no full catch up yet.

What interests me is why the catch up moment would be important. Is that merely symbolic, or something else?

year

USA

China

China as % of USA

2015

357612

242061

68%

2014

588479

352062

60%

2013

614184

322672

53%

2012

615353

276773

45%

2011

597977

247078

41%

2010

576215

223825

39%

2009

549322

211592

39%

2008

513175

189200

37%

2007

501885

169882

34%

2006

503899

156254

31%

2005

483530

132297

27%

2004

432862

90287

21%

2003

390198

59400

15%

2002

348260

50084

14%

2001

329304

53080

16%

2000

333300

41556

12%

total

7735555

2818103

36%

Best,
Jeroen

[101-innovations-icon-very-small]  101 innovations: tools database<http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list> | survey<https://101innovations.wordpress.com/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeroen Bosman, faculty liaison for the Faculty of Geosciences
Utrecht University Library<http://www.uu.nl/library>
email: j.bosman at uu.nl<mailto:j.bosman at uu.nl>
telephone: +31.30.2536613<tel:%2B31.30.2536613>
mail: Postbus 80124, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
visiting address: room 2.50, Heidelberglaan 3, Utrecht
web: Jeroen Bosman<http://www.uu.nl/university/library/en/disciplines/geo/Pages/ContactBosman.aspx>
twitter @jeroenbosman/ @geolibrarianUBU
profiles: : Academia<http://uu.academia.edu/JeroenBosman> / Google Scholar<http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=-IfPy3IAAAAJ&hl=en> / ISNI<http://www.isni.org/0000000028810209> /
Mendeley<http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/jeroen-bosman/> / MicrosoftAcademic<http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/51538592/jeroen-bosman> / ORCID<http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2727> / ResearcherID<http://www.researcherid.com/ProfileView.action?queryString=KG0UuZjN5WmCiHc%252FMC4oLVEKrQQu%252BpzQ8%252F9yrRrmi8Y%253D&Init=Yes&SrcApp=CR&returnCode=ROUTER.Success&SID=N27lOD6EgipnADLnAbK> /
ResearchGate<http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeroen_Bosman/> / Scopus<http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=7003519484> /  Slideshare<http://www.slideshare.net/hierohiero> /  VIAF<http://viaf.org/viaf/36099266/> /  Worldcat<http://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/lccn-n91-100619>
blogging at: I&M 2.0<http://im2punt0.wordpress.com/> / Ref4UU<http://ref4uu.blogspot.com/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trees say printing is a thing of the past

-----Original Message-----
From: SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of David Wojick
Sent: maandag 28 september 2015 16:40
To: sigmetrics at mail.asis.org<mailto:sigmetrics at mail.asis.org>
Subject: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

How does the present Chinese journal article output compare to the US? I recall discussions here some time ago about the Chinese output catching up with the US. Has it done so? Is it still growing?

David

_______________________________________________

SIGMETRICS mailing list

SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org<mailto:SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org>

http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics

_______________________________________________
SIGMETRICS mailing list
SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org<mailto:SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org>
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics

_______________________________________________
SIGMETRICS mailing list
SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org<mailto:SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org>
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics

--

Pamela C. Sieving, MA, MS, AHIP
Sieving Information Solutions
7309 Bannockburn Ridge Court
Bethesda, Maryland 20817
pamsieving at gmail.com<mailto:pamsieving at gmail.com>
301 263-9697 (h)   734 717-6006 (cell)

-----
But yield who will to their separation,
My object in living is to unite
My avocation and my vocation
As my two eyes make one in sight.
Only where love and need are one,
And the work is play for mortal stakes,
Is the deed ever really done
For Heaven and the future's sakes.
    (Robert Frost:  Two Tramps in Mud Time)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151015/43551cdd/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 995 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151015/43551cdd/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 995 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151015/43551cdd/attachment-0003.jpg>