[Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

Bosman, J.M. (Jeroen) j.bosman at uu.nl
Thu Oct 15 18:02:42 EDT 2015

Papers with authors from both countries will be counted for both columns.


101 innovations: tools database<http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list> | survey<https://101innovations.wordpress.com/>
Jeroen Bosman, faculty liaison for the Faculty of Geosciences
Utrecht University Library<http://www.uu.nl/library>
email: j.bosman at uu.nl<mailto:j.bosman at uu.nl>
Trees say printing is a thing of the past

From: SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Pamela Sieving
Sent: donderdag 15 oktober 2015 19:44
To: Yuling Tan
Cc: SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
Subject: Re: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

Does anyone know how the determination was made to include articles in one column or the other?  What happens with articles by authors in both China and the US?

Pam Sieving

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Yuling Tan <tanyuling2007 at gmail.com<mailto:tanyuling2007 at gmail.com>> wrote:
yes, this is a still growing trend!

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Pikas, Christina K. <Christina.Pikas at jhuapl.edu<mailto:Christina.Pikas at jhuapl.edu>> wrote:
I don’t know if anyone has mentioned it, but there has been a concerted effort to add more Chinese content to both WoS and Scopus in the past few years. Perhaps using CNKI for China would be better?  But then what would you use for the US?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151015/ec5f4b29/attachment.html>

More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list