[Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

[Pamela Sieving]

Does anyone know how the determination was made to include articles in one
column or the other?  What happens with articles by authors in both China
and the US?

Pam Sieving

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Yuling Tan <tanyuling2007 at gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, this is a still growing trend!
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Pikas, Christina K. <
> Christina.Pikas at jhuapl.edu> wrote:
>
>> I don’t know if anyone has mentioned it, but there has been a concerted
>> effort to add more Chinese content to both WoS and Scopus in the past few
>> years. Perhaps using CNKI for China would be better?  But then what would
>> you use for the US?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org] *On Behalf Of *Bosman,
>> J.M. (Jeroen)
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2015 12:28 PM
>> *To:* 'SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org'
>> *Subject:* Re: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a simple count by Scopus limited to articles and reviews. It
>> includes all papers with at least one author from the USA or China. So yes,
>> still growing, also relatively. But no, no full catch up yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> What interests me is why the catch up moment would be important. Is that
>> merely symbolic, or something else?
>>
>>
>>
>> year
>>
>> USA
>>
>> China
>>
>> China as % of USA
>>
>> 2015
>>
>> 357612
>>
>> 242061
>>
>> 68%
>>
>> 2014
>>
>> 588479
>>
>> 352062
>>
>> 60%
>>
>> 2013
>>
>> 614184
>>
>> 322672
>>
>> 53%
>>
>> 2012
>>
>> 615353
>>
>> 276773
>>
>> 45%
>>
>> 2011
>>
>> 597977
>>
>> 247078
>>
>> 41%
>>
>> 2010
>>
>> 576215
>>
>> 223825
>>
>> 39%
>>
>> 2009
>>
>> 549322
>>
>> 211592
>>
>> 39%
>>
>> 2008
>>
>> 513175
>>
>> 189200
>>
>> 37%
>>
>> 2007
>>
>> 501885
>>
>> 169882
>>
>> 34%
>>
>> 2006
>>
>> 503899
>>
>> 156254
>>
>> 31%
>>
>> 2005
>>
>> 483530
>>
>> 132297
>>
>> 27%
>>
>> 2004
>>
>> 432862
>>
>> 90287
>>
>> 21%
>>
>> 2003
>>
>> 390198
>>
>> 59400
>>
>> 15%
>>
>> 2002
>>
>> 348260
>>
>> 50084
>>
>> 14%
>>
>> 2001
>>
>> 329304
>>
>> 53080
>>
>> 16%
>>
>> 2000
>>
>> 333300
>>
>> 41556
>>
>> 12%
>>
>> total
>>
>> 7735555
>>
>> 2818103
>>
>> 36%
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Jeroen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: 101-innovations-icon-very-small]  101 innovations: tools database
>> <http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list> | survey
>> <https://101innovations.wordpress.com/>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> *------------------------------*
>>
>> Jeroen Bosman, faculty liaison for the Faculty of Geosciences
>>
>> Utrecht University Library <http://www.uu.nl/library>
>>
>> email: j.bosman at uu.nl
>>
>> telephone: +31.30.2536613
>>
>> mail: Postbus 80124, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
>>
>> visiting address: room 2.50, Heidelberglaan 3, Utrecht
>>
>> web: Jeroen Bosman
>> <http://www.uu.nl/university/library/en/disciplines/geo/Pages/ContactBosman.aspx>
>>
>> twitter @jeroenbosman/ @geolibrarianUBU
>>
>> profiles: : Academia <http://uu.academia.edu/JeroenBosman> / Google
>> Scholar <http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=-IfPy3IAAAAJ&hl=en> /
>> ISNI <http://www.isni.org/0000000028810209> /
>>
>> Mendeley <http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/jeroen-bosman/> /
>> MicrosoftAcademic
>> <http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/51538592/jeroen-bosman> /
>> ORCID <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2727> / ResearcherID
>> <http://www.researcherid.com/ProfileView.action?queryString=KG0UuZjN5WmCiHc%252FMC4oLVEKrQQu%252BpzQ8%252F9yrRrmi8Y%253D&Init=Yes&SrcApp=CR&returnCode=ROUTER.Success&SID=N27lOD6EgipnADLnAbK>
>> /
>>
>> ResearchGate <http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeroen_Bosman/> /
>> Scopus <http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=7003519484> /
>> Slideshare <http://www.slideshare.net/hierohiero> /  VIAF
>> <http://viaf.org/viaf/36099266/> /  Worldcat
>> <http://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/lccn-n91-100619>
>>
>> blogging at: I&M 2.0 <http://im2punt0.wordpress.com/> / Ref4UU
>> <http://ref4uu.blogspot.com/>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *Trees say printing is a thing of the past*
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org
>> <sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org>] On Behalf Of David Wojick
>> Sent: maandag 28 september 2015 16:40
>> To: sigmetrics at mail.asis.org
>> Subject: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?
>>
>>
>>
>> How does the present Chinese journal article output compare to the US? I
>> recall discussions here some time ago about the Chinese output catching up
>> with the US. Has it done so? Is it still growing?
>>
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> SIGMETRICS mailing list
>>
>> SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
>>
>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIGMETRICS mailing list
>> SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIGMETRICS mailing list
> SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics
>
>


-- 

Pamela C. Sieving, MA, MS, AHIP
Sieving Information Solutions
7309 Bannockburn Ridge Court
Bethesda, Maryland 20817
pamsieving at gmail.com
301 263-9697 (h)   734 717-6006 (cell)




-----
But yield who will to their separation,
My object in living is to unite
My avocation and my vocation
As my two eyes make one in sight.
Only where love and need are one,
And the work is play for mortal stakes,
Is the deed ever really done
For Heaven and the future's sakes.
    (Robert Frost:  Two Tramps in Mud Time)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151015/64298e5e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 995 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151015/64298e5e/attachment-0001.jpg>