Rankings of Universities and Research Centers
Isidro F. Aguillo
isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES
Wed Aug 27 10:58:46 EDT 2014
Thank you for your input, historical perspective is always welcomed. And
sorry for the parade, just coming back after summer holidays.
For the readers of this list perhaps it can be interesting to point
about a few facts I realized after 11 years of ranking experience
(shared with 20 years of belonging to metrics -biblio, webo, alt-
community). My major surprise was how much bibliometrics was unknown in
many universities around the world (yes, even in Europe!). Everybody
talked about impact factor but citation analysis was nowhere.
Then, suddenly in 2003 it was the publication of the Shanghai Ranking
and its shocking success even after bibliometric 'leaders' immediately
rejected it due to strong theoretical and technical limitations. More
rankings, most of them giving large weights to bibliometric indicators,
were published in the following years by people not belonging to the
metrics community. The composite indicators they introduced were
frequently built by combining highly correlated bibliometric variables.
In several cases, although these models were never presented in
international conferences or formally published in referred journals,
they were granted enormous popularity. Even today, the CWTS Leiden
Ranking, a far more rigorous and orthodox approach is not being
considered among the "top 3 more prestigious" rankings.
A few months ago I asked Paul Wouters if the success of the rankings
does not mean in some way the failure of bibliometricians (not the
Open floor ...
See all of you attending STI2014 conference at Leiden next week,
On 27/08/2014 15:45, Stephen J Bensman wrote:
> I hate to rain on your little parade, but--what the hell--I will. The first ranking of American universities was done by James McKeen Cattell in 1906 in the following article:
> Cattell, James McKeen. (1906) A statistical study of American men of science, the selection of a group of one thousand scientific men. Science, 24, 658-665, 699-707, 732-742.
> Your rankings are basically the same as his. Plus ca change, plus ca la meme chose, Needless to say, Cattell was a eugenicist, and this is where all this academic ranking hysteria originates. To make my point, I have attached a pdf of that part of his article, in which he presents his university and institutional rankings. See in particular Tables III-IV on pp. 739-740. They will look somewhat familiar to you. The available evidence is that these rankings are not random but the result of some process of "preferential attachment" to what institutions leading scientists adhere for study, teaching, and research, leading to high stability over time. To beat upon another of my little drums, it seems strangely similar to how the WWW and Google PageRank operates. That does not leave much hope for those trying to blast their way to the top. It seems set in concrete.
> Stephen J. Bensman, Ph.D.
> LSU Librairies
> Louisiana State University
> Baton Rouge, LA USA
> PS I was in the Cal Band (Berkeley), and we used to call Stanford the "Leland Stanford Junior High," and that was before the days of mooning the crowd.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:16 AM
> To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU
> Subject: [SIGMETRICS] Rankings of Universities and Research Centers
> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
> The new editions of the Rankings Web of Universities (now in its 11th
> year) and Research Centers have been published with data collected during July 2014. The rankings consist now of close to 22000 Higher Education Institutions and 8000 Research Centers with their own independent web presence.
> Ranking is built combining the following variables: Web presence, including general information, structure and organization, governance and transparency related documents, learning supporting items, technology transfer or community engagement among other webpages; Visibility, a virtual referendum about the global impact of such web contents; Openness, the commitment of the University to the open access initiatives through its institutional repository, portal of academic journals and availability of the full texts papers in the personal pages of their authors and Excellence, the number of highly cited papers (top 10% most cited) in 21 disciplines by is faculty members.
> In the current edition the top ranked universities are:
> 1. Harvard University
> 2. MIT
> 3. Stanford University
> 4. Cornell University
> 5. University of Michigan
> 6. University of California Berkeley
> 7= Columbia University
> 8= University of Washington
> 9. University of Minnesota
> 10. University of Pennsylvania
> Countries with Universities in the Top Hundred
> USA 66
> Canada 7
> UK 4
> Germany 3
> China 3
> Japan 2
> Switzerland 2
> Netherlands 1
> Australia 1
> Italy 1
> South Korea 1
> Taiwan 1
> Belgium 1
> Hong Kong 1
> Brazil 1
> Austria 1
> Czech Republic 1
> Singapore 1
> Mexico 1
> The Top Ranked in Region are:
> USA Harvard
> Canada Toronto
> Latin America Sao Paulo
> Caribbean University of the West Indies
> Europe Oxford
> Russia Lomonosov MSU
> Africa University of Cape Town
> Asia Seoul National University
> China Peking
> Japan Tokyo
> South Asia IIT Bombay
> Southeast Asia National University of Singapore
> Middle East Hebrew University of Jerusalem
> Arab World King Saud University
> Oceania Melbourne
> BRICS Sao Paulo
Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr.
The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC
isidro.aguillo at csic.es
Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ
Rankings Web webometrics.info
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa.
More information about the SIGMETRICS