OA

[David Wojick]

Dear Eric, what do you see me arguing for? To use the crude American 
expression, I have no dog in this fight. I am an analyst, not a moralist. I 
take no position on OA.

David

At 01:19 PM 10/23/2013, you wrote:
>Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): 
>http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
>Dear David
>
>Your response is not an analysis, it is an argument. Nice paradox.
>
>Eric
>
>
>2013/10/23 David Wojick 
><<mailto:dwojick at craigellachie.us>dwojick at craigellachie.us>
>Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
><http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html>http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
>
>Peter Suber is a leader of the OA movement. His article is an argument, 
>not an analysis. He seems to be oblivious to what is actually going on.
>
>Happy OA week.
>
>David Wojick
>
>At 02:20 PM 10/22/2013, you wrote:
>Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
><http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html>http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
>
>I post this without comment.
>
><http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/oct/21/open-access-myths-peter-suber-harvard>http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/oct/21/open-access-myths-peter-suber-harvard
>
>But I would be interested to hear listmembers responses/reactions
>
>BW
>
>Quentin Burrell
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20131023/7a63528c/attachment.html>