Fan, JC; McGhee, CNJ Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000-2004 CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 36 (1): 54-61 JAN-FEB 2008
Eugene Garfield
garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Thu Mar 20 10:07:22 EDT 2008
E-mail Address: c.mcghee at auckland.ac.nz
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01674.x
Author(s): Fan, JC (Fan, Jennifer C.); McGhee, CNJ (McGhee, Charles N. J.)
Title: Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology
journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000-2004
Source: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 36 (1): 54-61 JAN-FEB
2008
Language: English
Document Type: Article
Author Keywords: cataract; citation analysis; journal impact factor;
ophthalmology publication; refractive surgery
Keywords Plus: IMPACT-FACTOR; INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE; MICROVASCULAR
COMPLICATIONS; MACULAR EDEMA; ASSOCIATION; SCIENCE; PRODUCTIVITY; INDEXES;
QUALITY; LASIK
Abstract: Purpose: To identify the most published authors on the topics
of 'cataract' and 'LASIK', the journals in which they publish, and the
citation patterns of the most-cited articles by these authors over a 5-
year publication period.
Methods: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) was used to identify the 30
most-published authors in 'cataract' and 'laser in situ keratomileusis'
(LASIK) (2000-2004 inclusive). SCI was subsequently used to analyse the
recorded articles for each author in terms of source journal, the most
commonly cited articles and citation source.
Results: Of the 30 most-published authors in the fields of cataract and
LASIK, the USA was the most well-represented source country, accounting
for 33%; 20% were from Australia, and 17% from Austria. Germany and Japan
each contributed 7%. Eighty per cent of the publications produced by these
30 authors (2000-2004) were in 10 journals, of which the Journal of
Cataract and Refractive Surgery (JCRS) published more than one-third. Of
the three most-cited articles for each author, the greatest number were
published in JCRS (35.6%). The citation count of the articles had a weak
correlation to the journal impact factor of the source journal; however,
the self-citation rate of these articles did not.
Conclusions: The USA and Australia together were the source of more than
half of the most-published authors on cataract and LASIK and the majority
of articles published by the 30 most prolific authors were published in
only 10 journals. The impact factors of the publication journals preferred
by these authors are influenced by the article citation counts, not vice
versa.
Addresses: Univ Auckland, Dept Ophthalmol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland 1,
New Zealand
Reprint Address: McGhee, CNJ, Univ Auckland, Dept Ophthalmol, Fac Med &
Hlth Sci, Pvt Bag 92019, Auckland 1, New Zealand.
Cited Reference Count: 40
Times Cited: 0
Publisher: BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
Publisher Address: 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2ZG, OXON, ENGLAND
ISSN: 1442-6404
*I SCI INF
J CIT REP :
ADLER AI
Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and
microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective
observational study
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 321 : 412 2000
BLOCH S
The Impact Factor: Time for change
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 35 : 563 2001
CALLAHAM M
Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated
with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 : 2847 2002
CARTWRIGHT VA
Ophthalmology and vision science research - Part 1: Understanding and
using journal impact factors and citation indices
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY 31 : 1999 DOI
10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.031 2005
DANIS RP
Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in exudative age-related macular
degeneration
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES 20 : 244 2000
DAVIS M
Research contributions in ophthalmology: Australia's productivity
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY 31 : 286 2003
ENGELBRECHT NE
Retinal pigment epithelial changes after macular hole surgery with
indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 133 : 89 2002
FASSOULAKI A
Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA 46 : 902 2002
FRANK E
AUTHORS CRITERIA FOR SELECTING JOURNALS
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 : 163 1994
GARFIELD E
Journal impact factor: a brief review
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 161 : 979 1999
GARFIELD E
CITATION INDEXES FOR SCIENCE - NEW DIMENSION IN DOCUMENTATION THROUGH
ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS
SCIENCE 122 : 108 1955
GOWRISHANKAR J
Sprucing up one's impact factor
NATURE 401 : 321 1999
HANSSON S
IMPACT FACTOR AS A MISLEADING TOOL IN EVALUATION OF MEDICAL JOURNALS
LANCET 346 : 906 1995
HECHT F
The journal "impact factor": A misnamed, misleading, misused measure
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS 104 : 77 1998
KURMIS AP
Current concepts review - Understanding the limitations of the journal
impact factor
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 85 : 2449 2003
LICHTER PR
Collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study comparing initial treatment
randomized to medications or surgery
OPHTHALMOLOGY 108 : 1943 2001
LINARDI PM
The ''impact factor'' as a criterion for the quality of scientific
production is a relative, not absolute, measure
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH 29 : 555 1996
LINDE A
On the pitfalls of journal ranking by impact factor (R)
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES 106 : 525 1998
MANGIONE CM
Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function
Questionnaire
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 119 : 1050 2001
MARTIDIS A
Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema
OPHTHALMOLOGY 109 : 920 2002
MCGHEE CNJ
Cataract and refractive surgery: Reflecting on journal impact factors and
influence
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY 31 : 1849 DOI
10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.018 2005
MCGLYNN EA
NEW ENGL J MED 348 : 3635 2003
MCMENAMIN PG
Looking into the mirror: research productivity in Australian ophthalmology
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY 31 : 281 2003
MORENOBARRIUSO E
Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery:
LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE 42 : 1396 2001
NEUBERGER J
Impact factors: uses and abuses
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY 14 : 209 2002
OHBA N
The 100 most frequently cited articles in ophthalmology journals
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 125 : 952 2007
OPTHOF T
Sense and nonsense about the impact factor
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 33 : 1 1997
ROGERS LF
Impact factor: The numbers game
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 178 : 541 2002
SAHA S
Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 91 : 42 2003
SCHOONBAERT D
Impact takes precedence over interest
NATURE 391 : 222 1998
SEGLEN PO
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating
research
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 314 : 498 1997
SEGLEN PO
FROM BAD TO WORSE - EVALUATION BY JOURNAL IMPACT
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 14 : 326 1989
SIMS JL
Citation analysis and journal impact factors in ophthalmology and vision
science journals
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY 31 : 14 2003
STRATTON IM
Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular
complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational
study
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 321 : 405 2000
TALAMANCA AF
B GROUP INT RECH SCI 44 : 2 2002
VESALUOMA M
Corneal stromal changes induced by myopic LASIK
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE 41 : 369 2000
WHITEHOUSE G
Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY 74 : 1 2001
WHITEHOUSE GH
Impact factors: facts and myths
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY 12 : 715 2002
YOUNG S
Safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone for cystoid macular
oedema in uveitis
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY 29 : 2 2001
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list