bibliometric methods

[Dobri Georgievski]

Dear all,
I'm very thankful for your suggestions. I've already read Wilsons review
before sending this post, but I wasn't aware of other sources. I plan to
read them over the weekend  :)

Steve, I would be grateful if you could e-mail me the preprint of your
article. Thank you in advance.

Dobri Georgievski
PhD student


2008/3/6, Morris, Steven (BA) <Steven.Morris at bakerhughes.com>:
>
> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html<http://web.utk.edu/%7Egwhitney/sigmetrics.html>
>
> Dobri,
>
>
>
> The following review may be of use to you:
>
>
>
> Morris, S. A. & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008). Mapping research
> specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Volume 42.
> pp 213-295
>
>
>
> Section 3 of this review attempts a systematic description of the many
> methods used for descriptive bibliometrics.  It's fairly easy to put all
> those methods into a unified framework, but the real challenge is trying to
> decide which aspect of a research specialty that each bibliometric method
> measures.
>
>
>
> Please email me directly if you need a preprint:
> steven.morris at bakerhughes.com
>
>
>
> Thanks kindly,
>
>
>
> Steve Morris
>
>
>
>
>
> =================================================
>
> Steven A. Morris, Ph.D
>
> Strategic Technology and Advanced Research
>
> Resistivity and NMR Measurements
>
> Baker-Atlas/INTEQ
>
> Houston Technology Center
>
> 2001 Rankin Road, Houston, Texas 77073
>
> Office: 713-625-5055, Cell: 832-296-7819
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:
> SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Dobri Georgievski
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2008 6:00 PM
> *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU
> *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] bibliometric methods
>
>
>
> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html<http://web.utk.edu/%7Egwhitney/sigmetrics.html>
>
> Pardon my asking, are you aware of any article/monograph that lists,
> classifies and/or describes, in a systematic manner, all different
> bibliometric methods that are currently in use? (like: Citation analysis,
> bibliographic coupling, co-citation, citation context analysis, content
> analysis, publication analysis, co-word analysis ...). As a relative newbie
> to the field I'm only aware of Diodato's dictionary. Any other resources?
> Please!
>
>
>
> Dobri
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20080306/95a66a38/attachment.html>