bibliometric methods

[Morris, Steven (BA)]

Dobri,

 

The following review may be of use to you:

 

Morris, S. A. & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008). Mapping research
specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Volume
42. pp 213-295

 

Section 3 of this review attempts a systematic description of the many
methods used for descriptive bibliometrics.  It's fairly easy to put all
those methods into a unified framework, but the real challenge is trying
to decide which aspect of a research specialty that each bibliometric
method measures. 

 

Please email me directly if you need a preprint:
steven.morris at bakerhughes.com

 

Thanks kindly,

 

Steve Morris

 

 

=================================================

Steven A. Morris, Ph.D

Strategic Technology and Advanced Research

Resistivity and NMR Measurements

Baker-Atlas/INTEQ

Houston Technology Center

2001 Rankin Road, Houston, Texas 77073

Office: 713-625-5055, Cell: 832-296-7819

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics
[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Dobri Georgievski
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 6:00 PM
To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU
Subject: [SIGMETRICS] bibliometric methods

 


Pardon my asking, are you aware of any article/monograph that lists,
classifies and/or describes, in a systematic manner, all different
bibliometric methods that are currently in use? (like: Citation
analysis, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, citation context
analysis, content analysis, publication analysis, co-word analysis ...).
As a relative newbie to the field I'm only aware of Diodato's
dictionary. Any other resources? Please!

 

Dobri

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20080306/8cee423c/attachment.html>