[Sigia-l] Kano Analysis
Eric Scheid
eric.scheid at ironclad.net.au
Wed Nov 17 21:04:19 EST 2004
On 18/11/04 11:54 AM, "Boniface Lau" <boniface_lau at compuserve.com> wrote:
>> would you see benefit in going through the kano analysis process at
>> the level of individual IA widgets ... things like site search,
>> bread crumbs, site map, "you are here" landmarks, etc?
>
> Kano Analysis (KA) is about requirement strategy. It is applicable to
> widgets because widgets also have requirements.
Well, yes, and no. My reading so far is that KA can be used to determine the
requirements of the larger product, determining which components are to be
included, and which are to receive additional engineering.
Are you suggesting that KA be applied to an individual widget, so as to
determine which features/functions of that widget get special attention or
not?
>> would we be better off reserving kano analysis for the core features
>> and functions specific to the project? (i.e. not generic IA
>> components)
>
> Would it be better off to ignore the requirements for generic
> components?
This pre-supposes that an individual widget has requirements. Just how far
down into detail does one go?
e.
More information about the Sigia-l
mailing list