[Sigia-l] Still Defining the Damn Thing
Leo Frishberg
lfrishberg at whitehorse.com
Mon Feb 3 13:34:22 EST 2003
For those attending the IA Summit in Portland, CHIFOO will be "hosting" a
no-host cocktail hour on Saturday night in the Hilton Bar, with an
opportunity to engage in this perennial definition activity in front of a
poster board, post-it in one hand, drink in the other.
Leo Frishberg
Program Chair, CHIFOO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard_Dalton at Vanguard.com [mailto:Richard_Dalton at Vanguard.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:29 AM
> To: sigia-l at asis.org
> Subject: [Sigia-l] Still Defining the Damn Thing
>
>
> I agree 100% with Christina Wodtke and others who have the
> opinion that we
> need more
> definition of Information Architecture (and other related
> disciplines). To
> that end
> I offer yet another definition (in what I hope is simple, plain-talk
> language).
>
> Comments and discussion are welcome - if you don't want to discuss it
> (again) on this
> mailing list, then why don't those of us who do find
> somewhere we can -
> suggestions welcome.
>
> - Richard Dalton
>
>
> "Finding vs Using" - A User Driven Definition
> =============================================
>
> This debate is being discussed mainly within the context of Websites.
> Users face
> (at least) 2 major challenges when using Websites:
>
> 1. Finding "things".
> 2. Using the "things" once they've found them.
>
> I suggest that:
>
> - Information Architecture is the discipline of organizing and
> providing navigation
> to "things" in such a way that users can find them.
>
> - Interaction Design (or whatever you want to call it) is the
> discipline of designing
> the "things" such that users can use them once they've
> found them.
>
> I realize the term "things" could use some work - i'd loosely
> define it as
> "content or functionality that helps a user complete their task".
>
> I would include the following within the realm of I/A: User
> Research to
> identify
> discrete User Tasks, Creation of Mental Model Diagrams using
> User Tasks,
> Content Inventories (including Metadata), Taxonomy &
> Labelling, Searching
> Systems,
> "Traditional" Information Architecture Diagrams, Page Layouts or
> Frameworks that
> show placement of global navigation elements, etc, etc.
>
> And the following within the realm of I/D: User Research &
> Task Analysis
> to drive
> Workflows of discrete User Tasks, Local Navigation
> (navigation between
> pages within
> a discrete "thing"), Page Design (selection & placement of
> task specific
> content
> or functionality on the page).
>
> There does not seem to be a huge of overlap in the skills
> used to organize
> information
> to help people find it at a macro level (cognitive
> psychology, LIS?, etc)
> vs those
> used to help someone interact with an interface (HCI, graphic design,
> etc).
>
> ------------
> When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
> *Plain text, please; NO Attachments
>
> ASIST IA 03 Summit: Making Connections
> http://www.asist-events.org/IASummit2003/
>
> Searchable list archive: http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
> ________________________________________
> Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
> Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
>
More information about the Sigia-l
mailing list