[Asis-standards] 2016 votes (3)
TIMOTHY DICKEY
tdickey1 at kent.edu
Wed Nov 2 08:36:36 EDT 2016
Good morning,
Vote to CONFIRM both of these standards under revision review. I am
particularly happy that the ISO 25964 revision has taken so much effort to
include technical issues, from app interoperability to a data model, and
even to considering when to include common misspellings as terms formally
requiring entry into the thesaurus.
All best,
timothy
Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS.
tdickey1 at kent.edu
(614) 785-1632
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Needleman <needleman_mark at yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > The last note (for now)
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > 1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation
> -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1:
> Thesauri for information retrieval
> >
> > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9
> standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and
> interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for
> information retrieval
> >
> > This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and
> maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It
> is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all
> types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text,
> sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including
> knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or
> multimedia collections, and the items within them.
> >
> > This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format
> for the import and export of thesaurus data.
> >
> > This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual
> thesauri.
> >
> > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of
> back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be
> useful for that purpose.
> >
> > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software
> used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the
> needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus
> management.
> >
> > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote
> comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended
> purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
> >
> > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
> > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
> adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
> >
> > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard
> or was it modified?
> >
> > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
> applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
> products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
> >
> > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced
> in regulations in your country?
> >
> > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
> to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
> like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
> in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
> information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name
> and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
> following Stakeholder Categories:
> >
> >
> > Industry and Commerce
> > Government
> > Consumers
> > Labour
> > Academic and Research Bodies
> > Standards Application
> > Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
> >
> > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
> >
> > Your voting options are:
> >
> > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> > Withdraw [comments required]
> > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
> [comments optional]
> >
> > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case
> the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or
> know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the
> persons agreement if its not you)
> >
> > 2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation --
> Format for information exchange
> >
> > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4
> standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for
> information exchange
> >
> > This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized
> exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material
> capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records.
> >
> > It does not define the length or the content of individual records and
> does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these
> specifications being the functions of an implementation format.
> >
> > This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a
> framework designed specially for communications between data processing
> systems and not for use as a processing format within systems.
> >
> > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote
> comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended
> purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
> >
> > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
> > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
> adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
> >
> > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard
> or was it modified?
> >
> > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
> applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
> products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
> >
> > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced
> in regulations in your country?
> >
> > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
> to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
> like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
> in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
> information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name
> and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
> following Stakeholder Categories:
> >
> > Industry and Commerce
> > Government
> > Consumers
> > Labour
> > Academic and Research Bodies
> > Standards Application
> > Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
> >
> > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
> >
> > Your voting options are:
> >
> > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> > Withdraw [comments required]
> > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
> [comments optional]
> >
> > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case
> the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or
> know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the
> persons agreement if its not you)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
Good morning,
Vote to CONFIRM both of these standards under revision review. I am
particularly happy that the ISO 25964 revision has taken so much effort to
include technical issues, from app interoperability to a data model, and
even to considering when to include common misspellings as terms formally
requiring entry into the thesaurus.
All best,
timothy
Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS.
[1]tdickey1 at kent.edu
(614) 785-1632
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Needleman
<[2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> The last note (for now)
>
> Mark
>
> 1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation
-- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1:
Thesauri for information retrieval
>
> This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9
standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and
interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for
information retrieval
>
> This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and
maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications.
It is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all
types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text,
sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including
knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or
multimedia collections, and the items within them.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format
for the import and export of thesaurus data.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual
thesauri.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of
back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be
useful for that purpose.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software
used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the
needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus
management.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote
comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended
purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your
vote:
> 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
>
> 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard
or was it modified?
>
> 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
>
> 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced
in regulations in your country?
>
> 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expertâs full name
and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
following Stakeholder Categories:
>
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this
project.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> Withdraw [comments required]
> Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
[comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case
the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or
know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the
persons agreement if its not you)
>
> 2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation --
Format for information exchange
>
> This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4
standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for
information exchange
>
> This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized
exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material
capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records.
>
> It does not define the length or the content of individual records and
does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these
specifications being the functions of an implementation format.
>
> This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a
framework designed specially for communications between data processing
systems and not for use as a processing format within systems.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote
comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended
purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your
vote:
> 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
>
> 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard
or was it modified?
>
> 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
>
> 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced
in regulations in your country?
>
> 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expertâs full name
and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
following Stakeholder Categories:
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this
project.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> Withdraw [comments required]
> Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
[comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case
the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or
know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the
persons agreement if its not you)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Asis-standards mailing list
[3]Asis-standards at asis.org
[4]http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
References
1. mailto:tdickey1 at kent.edu
2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com
3. mailto:Asis-standards at asis.org
4. http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
More information about the Asis-standards
mailing list