[Asis-standards] 2016 Votes (2)
TIMOTHY DICKEY
tdickey1 at kent.edu
Wed Nov 2 08:36:19 EDT 2016
Good morning,
Here is a vote to CONFIRM on both of these five-year reviews.
I must say that the ISO 9707 publication statistics standard feels weaker
now, moreso than its last incarnation. They deliberately put off a decision
on how to include electronic book statistics until the next five-year
systematic review, and they still blithely consider the "title" to be the
unit of publication (which files in the face of both the publishers'
practice of assigning ISBNs and librarians' even more complex practice of
parsing differences between entities in bibliographic description).
However, my objections do not rise to the level of a vote to withdraw, and
I certainly do not have a "national expert" to nominate for revisions at
this stage.
All best,
timothy
Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS.
tdickey1 at kent.edu
(614) 785-1632
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Mark Needleman <needleman_mark at yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Here are 2 more - 1 more note to come
>
> Mark
>
> 1) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and
> documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and
> related organizations (ISIL)
>
> This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4
> standard ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation --
> International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations
> (ISIL)
>
> This International Standard specifies the International Standard
> identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL), whichcomprises a
> set of standard identifiers used for the unique identification of
> libraries, archives, museums and related organizations with a minimum
> impact on already existing systems.
> An ISIL identifies an organization, i.e. a library, an archive, a museum
> or a related organization, or one of its subordinate units, which is
> responsible for an action or service in an informational environment (e.g.
> creation of machine-readable information). It can be used to identify the
> originator or holder of a resource (e.g. library material or a collection
> in an archive). The ISIL is intended for use by libraries, archives,
> museums and agencies doing business or interacting with these organizations
> (e.g. suppliers, publishers, and government institutions). An ISIL
> identifies an organization or one of its subordinate units throughout its
> life. In some cases, such as when an organization has undergone a
> significant administrative change (e.g. a merger with another
> organization), particularly one that results in a name change, a new ISIL
> identifier can be allocated.
>
> Since this International Standard allows the use of existing codes to be
> incorporated into the ISIL, it is possible that a given organization can
> have more than one ISIL. However, it is the intention of this International
> Standard to minimize the number of codes. Any library, archive, museum or
> related organization, administrative unit or subordinate unit, acting
> autonomously, can be allocated an ISIL. An ISIL is not intended to be used
> to classify organizations or their services and holdings.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
> If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
> this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
> 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
> adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
>
> 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or
> was it modified?
>
> 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
> applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
> products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
>
> 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in
> regulations in your country?
>
> 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
> to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
> like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
> in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
> information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name
> and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
> following Stakeholder Categories:
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> Withdraw [comments required]
> Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
> [comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/17/2016 - If the
> vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who
> would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that
> persons agreement if its not you)
>
> 2) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation --
> Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers,
> periodicals and electronic publications
>
> This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8
> standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the
> production and
> distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications
>
> This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national
> statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the
> production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications
> (essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this
> International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification
> (see Annex A).
>
> This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of
> publication:
>
> a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or
> scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed
> free of charge, including
> 1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial,
> industrial and tourist advertising, and
> 2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the
> publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical progress
> in some branch of industry or commerce;
>
> b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical
> examples are
> 1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories,
> 2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs,
> 3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars,
> 4) calendars, and
> 5) electronic texts under development;
>
> c) publications in which the text is not the most important part, including
> 1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the
> words, and
> 2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical
> charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps,
> geological surveys in map form and topographical plans.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
> If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
> this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
> 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
> adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
>
> 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or
> was it modified?
>
> 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
> applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
> products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
>
> 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in
> regulations in your country?
>
> 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
> to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
> like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
> in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
> information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name
> and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
> following Stakeholder Categories:
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> Withdraw [comments required]
> Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
> [comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/28/2016 - If the
> vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who
> would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that
> persons agreement if its not you)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> /2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or
> know
> someone who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of
> course that persons agreement if its not you)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
Good morning,
Here is a vote to CONFIRM on both of these five-year reviews.
I must say that the ISO 9707 publication statistics standard feels weaker
now, moreso than its last incarnation. They deliberately put off a decision
on how to include electronic book statistics until the next five-year
systematic review, and they still blithely consider the "title" to be the
unit of publication (which files in the face of both the publishers'
practice of assigning ISBNs and librarians' even more complex practice of
parsing differences between entities in bibliographic description). However,
my objections do not rise to the level of a vote to withdraw, and I
certainly do not have a "national expert" to nominate for revisions at this
stage.
All best,
timothy
Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS.
[1]tdickey1 at kent.edu
(614) 785-1632
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Mark Needleman
<[2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com> wrote:
Here are 2 more - 1 more note to come
Mark
1) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and
documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and
related organizations (ISIL)
This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4
standard ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation --
International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations
(ISIL)
This International Standard specifies the International Standard
identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL), whichcomprises
a set of standard identifiers used for the unique identification of
libraries, archives, museums and related organizations with a minimum
impact on already existing systems.
An ISIL identifies an organization, i.e. a library, an archive, a museum
or a related organization, or one of its subordinate units, which is
responsible for an action or service in an informational environment (e.g.
creation of machine-readable information). It can be used to identify the
originator or holder of a resource (e.g. library material or a collection
in an archive). The ISIL is intended for use by libraries, archives,
museums and agencies doing business or interacting with these
organizations (e.g. suppliers, publishers, and government institutions).
An ISIL identifies an organization or one of its subordinate units
throughout its life. In some cases, such as when an organization has
undergone a significant administrative change (e.g. a merger with another
organization), particularly one that results in a name change, a new ISIL
identifier can be allocated.
Since this International Standard allows the use of existing codes to be
incorporated into the ISIL, it is possible that a given organization can
have more than one ISIL. However, it is the intention of this
International Standard to minimize the number of codes. Any library,
archive, museum or related organization, administrative unit or
subordinate unit, acting autonomously, can be allocated an ISIL. An ISIL
is not intended to be used to classify organizations or their services and
holdings.
***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose
of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or
was it modified?
3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in
regulations in your country?
5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expertâs full name
and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
following Stakeholder Categories:
Industry and Commerce
Government
Consumers
Labour
Academic and Research Bodies
Standards Application
Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
Your voting options are:
Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
Withdraw [comments required]
Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
[comments optional]
Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/17/2016 - If the
vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone
who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course
that persons agreement if its not you)
2) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation --
Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers,
periodicals and electronic publications
This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8
standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on
the production and
distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications
This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national
statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the
production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications
(essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this
International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification
(see Annex A).
This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of
publication:
a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or
scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed
free of charge, including
1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial,
industrial and tourist advertising, and
2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the
publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical
progress in some branch of industry or commerce;
b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical
examples are
1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories,
2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs,
3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars,
4) calendars, and
5) electronic texts under development;
c) publications in which the text is not the most important part,
including
1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the
words, and
2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical
charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps,
geological surveys in map form and topographical plans.
***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose
of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or
was it modified?
3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in
regulations in your country?
5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed
to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would
like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information
in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular
information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expertâs full name
and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the
following Stakeholder Categories:
Industry and Commerce
Government
Consumers
Labour
Academic and Research Bodies
Standards Application
Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
Your voting options are:
Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
Withdraw [comments required]
Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
[comments optional]
Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/28/2016 - If the
vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone
who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course
that persons agreement if its not you)
  /2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee
or know
  someone who would make a good member get me the contact details
(and of
  course that persons agreement if its not you)
_______________________________________________
Asis-standards mailing list
[3]Asis-standards at asis.org
[4]http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
References
1. mailto:tdickey1 at kent.edu
2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com
3. mailto:Asis-standards at asis.org
4. http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
More information about the Asis-standards
mailing list