[Asis-standards] Fwd: ISO DIS 16349

[Mark Needleman]

so you think we should stick with a YES vote?

mark


On 7/10/2013 7:40 AM, Baden Hughes wrote:
> I agree it is tending that way, but on the other hand its also 
> attempting to tandardising the methods used as well as the benchmarks 
> themselves.
>
> As I said earlier, my experience with this type of thing is that 
> people rarely adopt them wholesale, but use them as a starting point 
> to customise their own community (however that is defined) methods and 
> metrics. On the other hand, starting from a common base is incredibly 
> useful when working across multiple library types, so I'd suggest it 
> is more of a standard in that sense.
>
> Baden
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu 
> <mailto:mneedlem at ufl.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     Folks
>
>     before voting on ISO DIS16349 - i read some of the other voter
>     comments
>     from organizations that voted NO their comments were basically
>     that this
>     was more of a best practices document than an International Standard
>     Anyone think we should change our vote to NO
>
>
>     mark
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Asis-standards mailing list
>     Asis-standards at asis.org <mailto:Asis-standards at asis.org>
>     http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>
>

-------------- next part --------------