[Asis-standards] Fwd: ISO DIS 16349

[Baden Hughes]

I think so.

Counter point: what happens if we vote no ?


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu> wrote:

>
>
> so you think we should stick with a YES vote?
>
> mark
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2013 7:40 AM, Baden Hughes wrote:
>
> I agree it is tending that way, but on the other hand its also attempting
> to tandardising the methods used as well as the benchmarks themselves.
>
>  As I said earlier, my experience with this type of thing is that people
> rarely adopt them wholesale, but use them as a starting point to customise
> their own community (however that is defined) methods and metrics. On the
> other hand, starting from a common base is incredibly useful when working
> across multiple library types, so I'd suggest it is more of a standard in
> that sense.
>
>  Baden
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> Folks
>>
>> before voting on ISO DIS16349 - i read some of the other voter comments
>> from organizations that voted NO their comments were basically that this
>> was more of a best practices document than an International Standard
>> Anyone think we should change our vote to NO
>>
>>
>> mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asis-standards mailing list
>> Asis-standards at asis.org
>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------