[Asis-standards] Fwd: ISO DIS 16349

[Baden Hughes]

I agree it is tending that way, but on the other hand its also attempting
to tandardising the methods used as well as the benchmarks themselves.

As I said earlier, my experience with this type of thing is that people
rarely adopt them wholesale, but use them as a starting point to customise
their own community (however that is defined) methods and metrics. On the
other hand, starting from a common base is incredibly useful when working
across multiple library types, so I'd suggest it is more of a standard in
that sense.

Baden

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu> wrote:

>
> Folks
>
> before voting on ISO DIS16349 - i read some of the other voter comments
> from organizations that voted NO their comments were basically that this
> was more of a best practices document than an International Standard
> Anyone think we should change our vote to NO
>
>
> mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>
-------------- next part --------------