[Sigia-l] Meaning of "unified development methodologies"
Andrew Boyd
andrew_db at bigpond.com
Thu May 12 16:24:35 EDT 2005
Tanya Rabourn wrote:
>Would it have worked better the other way around -- if you
>would have produced scenarios, validated by the end users
>which the IT team then used in the construction of their RUP
>artifacts?
>
>-Tanya
>
>
>
Hi Tanya,
hell yes :) But this wasn't possible - I was brought in half way through
the development process to look at what was needed in the way of
information support - manuals and online help - and noticed that the
developers and users weren't talking, a sure-fire sign that 'what we
asked for but not what we want' was being developed. I looked at the
process and made some suggestions about how it could be made to work,
and the scenarios were the cheapest way to try and retrofit a proper
consultation process. It was not ideal, but the end result was far
better than if the intervention not taken place (the developers were
writing something that didn't fit a previously unidentified mandatory
requirement). This was one of those 'anything is better than nothing'
situations. I am still warmed by the small glow of satisfaction from
that one :)
Cheers, Andrew
--
_________________________________________
Andrew Boyd
Business Development Manager
Daily Basis P/L
Phone 02 6282 9797 or 02 4885 1357
Mobile 0412 641 074
Email andrew at dailybasis.com.au
or andrew_db at bigpond.com
_________________________________________
More information about the Sigia-l
mailing list