[Sigia-l] Classification is an essential skill

[Derek R]

>| I'm going to keep 'calling' you out
>| until you respond, Derek. :)

I would like to respond to you Jonathan, but your responses are not
responsive. Do you understand? 

99% of what you say to me I have already covered in detail. Or you
resort to name-dropping big-time academic authors people may have heard
of, but nobody understands, or cares to. In truth I feel your comments
boil-down to some personal satisfaction gained by 'calling' me names.
Selah. No loss, no gain.


Gerry wrote:
>>| I simply do not agree with the view
>>| that everyone has a completely different
>>| view of the world

Jonathan wrote:
>|  Does everyone have a different point
>|  of view? Of course.

Just how is it you can disagree with Gerry  -- and -- claim to agree
with him? 


>| Gerry said *completely different*

If something (i.e. a 'view') is different -- it is different (wholly
so). What makes you think one would believe you mean 'similar' by use of
the word 'different?' That is not *how* the word is used. Use of any
qualifying word is already 'complete.' (i.e. What completely makes
completely you completely think completely one completely would
completely believe completely you completely mean completely 'similar'
completely by completely use completely of completely the completely
word completely 'different?')

In other words, you can ignore the qualifier 'completely' as a *useless
addition* which is only presented as a hyperbolic, authority-invoking
syntax, disproportionate to circumstance. Do you understand yet? Or if
you prefer -- do you 'completely' understand yet? What's the difference,
besides hubris?