[Asis-standards] More votes

Marjorie Hlava margie_hlava at accessinn.com
Fri Sep 8 15:56:11 EDT 2017 

1- yes
2. completely neutral
3. yes


> On Sep 8, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Mark Needleman <needleman_mark at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>   Folks
> 
>   Here are some votes coming due in December (relevant documents attached)
> 
>   Mark
> 
> 1) ISO TC 46/SC 11 ISO/FDIS 17068, Information and documentation -- Trusted
> third party repository for digital records
> 
>   Do you approve the technical content of the final draft?
>   This document specifies requirements for a trusted third party repository
>   (TTPR) to support the authorized custody service in order to safeguard
>   provable integrity and authenticity of clients’ digital records and serve as
>   a source of reliable evidence.
>   This document is applicable to retention or repository services for digital
>   records  as a source of evidence during the retention periods of legal
>   obligation in both the private and the public sectors.
>   This document has the limitation that the authorized custody of the stored
>   records is between only the TTPR and the client.
>   Your voting options are:
>   Approval [comments optional]
>   Approval with corrections [comments required]
>   Disapproval [comments required and should be substantive]
>   Abstain from voting [comments optional]
> 
>   Comments due by 9/14/2017
> 
> 2) SHORT-TERM BALLOT: TC46 SC11 N1700 Establish Liaison to ISO PC 302
> Guidelines for auditing management systems
> 
>    you agree to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302 Guidelines for auditing
>   management systems and to nominate Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison
>   officer?
>   TC46  SC11 agreed to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for
>   auditing management systems to have the opportunity to review the ongoing
>   work in this project committee to revise ISO 19011.
>   Question 1
>   Do you agree to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302 Guidelines for auditing
>   management systems?
>   Question 2
>   Do you agree to the nomination of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison
>   officer for ISO/PC 302?
>   You have three voting options for each of the above questions.
>   Question 1 options:
>   I agree with establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for auditing
>   management systems. (Comment optional)
>   I disagree with establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for
>   auditing management systems. (Comment required)
>   I abstain from voting on establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines
>   for auditing management systems. (Comment optional)
>   Question 2 options:
>   I agree with the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison officer
>   for ISO/PC 302. (Comment optional)
>   I disagree with the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison
>   officer for ISO/PC 302. (Comment required)
>   I abstain from voting on the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the
>   liaison officer for ISO/PC 302. (Comment optional)
> 
>   Comments due by 9/26/2017
> 
> 3) NISO Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag Suite
> 
>   Do you approve this new standard (NISO Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag
>   Suite) for publication as an American National Standard?
>   This voting pool is to approve the publication of the new standard NISO
>   Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag Suite, as an American National Standard.
>   The Standards Tag Suite (STS) provides a common XML format that developers,
>   publishers, and distributors of standards, including national standards
>   bodies,  regional  and  international  standards bodies, and standards
>   development organizations, can use to publish and exchange full-text content
>   and  metadata  of  standards. STS is based on ANSI/NISO Z39.96 (JATS).
>   Structures are provided to encode both the normative and non-normative
>   content of: standards, adoptions of standards, and standards-like documents
>   that are produced by standards organizations.
>   Your voting options are:
>   Yes -- approve for publication as an American National Standard
>   No -- do not approve for publication
>   Abstain from voting
>   Comments are required for No and Abstain votes.
>   Comments due 9/27/2017
> 
> 4) ISO CD 8.2, Information and documentation - Presentation of Periodicals
> 
>   Do you approve the circulation of the draft as a DIS (Draft International
>   Standard?
>   Periodicals, whatever their medium, play a critical role in the information
>   society, and more specifically in the global information infrastructure.
>   Citations  to  articles  in scholarly journals, whether in print or in
>   e-journals,  form the basis for much scholarly research. Popular trade
>   magazines as well as newsletters are used by authors, researchers, and
>   students  of all ages. Search, discovery, and use of the wide range of
>   today’s periodicals requires that they provide reliable identification and
>   display  of  key  information by following standardized principles and
>   procedures.
>   Publishers and providers have long taken great pride in the diverse designs
>   of their products. Nonetheless, designers and publishers may be unaware that
>   some of their practices are impeding identification of their publications
>   and access to the contents. The advent of digital publishing has provided
>   even more opportunity for creativity in design, as well as the ability to
>   change the look and feel of a digital publication both retrospectively and
>   prospectively.  Therefore, the presentation of information for digital
>   publications has become even more critical: depending on the way the website
>   is organized and the contents are linked together, the end user’s task of
>   discovering  articles  and  accessing  them  may  turn out to be easy,
>   frustrating, or completely fruitless.
>   In 1954 when ISO Recommendation R8-1954, the predecessor to ISO 8: 1977, was
>   published, there was no such thing as digital publishing, nor were there
>   identification  standards such as ISSN or ISBN. ISO 8 was also focused
>   exclusively on print periodicals. It was published at a time when the ISSN
>   was still in its infancy. The evolution of the publishing market in recent
>   decades,  the  use  of  media  other  than paper, and the evolution of
>   identification  standards make it necessary to revise ISO 8 to include
>   recommendations applicable to all possible media as well as to develop
>   recommendations  specifically  to  address  the  complexity of digital
>   publications. For example, this standard recognizes the new need to embed
>   both human-readable and machine-readable metadata in publications. This
>   revised  standard  is based in part on the 1977 ISO 8 standard for its
>   recommendations pertaining to print periodicals and on a NISO document,
>   PIE-J, or “Recommended Practices for the Presentation and Identification of
>   E-Journals” (NISO RP-16-2013) for its recommendations concerning digital
>   periodicals.
>   This Standard is applicable to continuing publications identifiable as
>   “periodicals”  (see  below  Terms and definitions). Newspapers are not
>   generally considered to be periodicals and therefore specialized information
>   relevant  only  to  newspapers is not included. This Standard does not
>   specifically address or apply to books, including series of books, nor to
>   content that is continuously updated such as databases, loose-leaf services,
>   online  reference  works, and most websites. Nevertheless, many of the
>   recommendations about titles, identifiers, and digitization processes may be
>   applicable to newspapers as well as to other kinds of continuing print and
>   online publications.
>   This International Standard contains recommendations intended to enable
>   editors  and  publishers  of  periodicals  to identify and present key
>   information in a form that will help users discover, cite and access their
>   information  over  time  and  through  any  changes.  Following  these
>   recommendations should also help editors and publishers to better understand
>   the needs of researchers, librarians, and other users and to bring clarity
>   to their own work. Application of the recommendations offered here will
>   result in improved discovery and access for users and machines. This will
>   benefit  all  stakeholders of the periodical supply chain: publishers,
>   providers, authors, librarians, and researchers. Authors’ work will not be
>   lost due to well-meaning but historically inaccurate citations; researchers
>   will  find the information that they need; librarians will have better
>   control of their collections; and providers and publishers will benefit from
>   increased use of their publications.
>   Presentation and identification of periodicals is a broad and detailed topic
>   but this Standard has a deliberately narrow focus on only those elements of
>   periodicals—printed, born digital or retroactively digitized—that relate to
>   the presentation of title and supporting descriptive information, plus
>   practices related to title identification and content access over time.
>   Therefore, this Standard is not concerned with the overall design of the
>   periodical, except where that design affects the presentation of the title,
>   and has unintended consequences for resource discovery and access to earlier
>   content. The recommendations are of varying importance and may not always
>   accommodate certain artistic, technical or advertising considerations.
>   The recommendations address the following:
>   - Display of periodical title(s) and other critical identifying information:
>   issues, numbering systems, pagination, etc.
>   - Retention of title and citation information under which articles were
>   originally published.
>   -  Display of title histories, including information relating to title
>   changes.
>   - Embedding appropriate metadata into digital versions.
>   - Display of correct ISSN, including different ISSN for each format and for
>   changed titles.
>   - Retention and display of vital publication information across the history
>   of a periodical, including publisher names; clear numbering and dates;
>   editors, editorial boards, and sponsoring organizations; and frequency of
>   publication.
>   - Graphic design that supports clarity and consistency of information,
>   particularly title information and inclusion of information that allows easy
>   access to all content.
>   Special considerations for retrospective digitization.
>   Your voting options are:
>   Approval [comments optional]
>   Approval with corrections [comments required]
>   Disapproval [comments required and should be substantive]
>   Abstain from voting [comments optional]
>   Comments due by 9/28/2017
> <ISO_TC46_SC11_ISO_FDIS_17068_(E).pdf>
> 
> 
> <ISO-TC46-SC11_N1700_Establish_Liaison_to_ISO_PC_302_Guidelines_for_auditing_management_systems.pdf>
> 
> 
> <NISO_Z39.102-201x_STS_Standards_Tag_Suite_[final for approval].pdf>
> 
> 
> <N2668, ISO TC 46 CD 8, Information and documentation - Presentation and identification of periodicals.pdf>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards

More information about the Asis-standards mailing list