[Asis-standards] More votes

Mark Needleman needleman_mark at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 8 15:04:53 EDT 2017


Folks

Here are some votes coming due in December (relevant documents attached)

Mark

1) ISO TC 46/SC 11 ISO/FDIS 17068, Information and documentation -- Trusted third party repository for digital records



Do you approve the technical content of the final draft?
This document specifies requirements for a trusted third party repository (TTPR) to support the authorized custody service in order to safeguard provable integrity and authenticity of clients’ digital records and serve as a source of reliable evidence.

This document is applicable to retention or repository services for digital records as a source of evidence during the retention periods of legal obligation in both the private and the public sectors.

This document has the limitation that the authorized custody of the stored records is between only the TTPR and the client.

Your voting options are:

Approval [comments optional]
Approval with corrections [comments required]
Disapproval [comments required and should be substantive]
Abstain from voting [comments optional]

Comments due by 9/14/2017

2) SHORT-TERM BALLOT: TC46 SC11 N1700 Establish Liaison to ISO PC 302 Guidelines for auditing management systems

 you agree to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302 Guidelines for auditing management systems and to nominate Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison officer?

TC46 SC11 agreed to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for auditing management systems to have the opportunity to review the ongoing work in this project committee to revise ISO 19011. 

Question 1
Do you agree to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302 Guidelines for auditing management systems?

Question 2
Do you agree to the nomination of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison officer for ISO/PC 302? 

You have three voting options for each of the above questions.

Question 1 options:

I agree with establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for auditing management systems. (Comment optional)

I disagree with establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for auditing management systems. (Comment required)

I abstain from voting on establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for auditing management systems. (Comment optional)

Question 2 options:

I agree with the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison officer for ISO/PC 302. (Comment optional)

I disagree with the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison officer for ISO/PC 302. (Comment required)

I abstain from voting on the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison officer for ISO/PC 302. (Comment optional)

Comments due by 9/26/2017

3) NISO Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag Suite

Do you approve this new standard (NISO Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag Suite) for publication as an American National Standard?
This voting pool is to approve the publication of the new standard NISO Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag Suite, as an American National Standard. 

The Standards Tag Suite (STS) provides a common XML format that developers, publishers, and distributors of standards, including national standards bodies, regional and international standards bodies, and standards development organizations, can use to publish and exchange full-text content and metadata of standards. STS is based on ANSI/NISO Z39.96 (JATS). Structures are provided to encode both the normative and non-normative content of: standards, adoptions of standards, and standards-like documents that are produced by standards organizations.


Your voting options are:
Yes -- approve for publication as an American National Standard
No -- do not approve for publication
Abstain from voting

Comments are required for No and Abstain votes.

Comments due 9/27/2017

4) ISO CD 8.2, Information and documentation - Presentation of Periodicals

Do you approve the circulation of the draft as a DIS (Draft International Standard?

Periodicals, whatever their medium, play a critical role in the information society, and more specifically in the global information infrastructure. Citations to articles in scholarly journals, whether in print or in e-journals, form the basis for much scholarly research. Popular trade magazines as well as newsletters are used by authors, researchers, and students of all ages. Search, discovery, and use of the wide range of today’s periodicals requires that they provide reliable identification and display of key information by following standardized principles and procedures.

Publishers and providers have long taken great pride in the diverse designs of their products. Nonetheless, designers and publishers may be unaware that some of their practices are impeding identification of their publications and access to the contents. The advent of digital publishing has provided even more opportunity for creativity in design, as well as the ability to change the look and feel of a digital publication both retrospectively and prospectively. Therefore, the presentation of information for digital publications has become even more critical: depending on the way the website is organized and the contents are linked together, the end user’s task of discovering articles and accessing them may turn out to be easy, frustrating, or completely fruitless.

In 1954 when ISO Recommendation R8-1954, the predecessor to ISO 8: 1977, was published, there was no such thing as digital publishing, nor were there identification standards such as ISSN or ISBN. ISO 8 was also focused exclusively on print periodicals. It was published at a time when the ISSN was still in its infancy. The evolution of the publishing market in recent decades, the use of media other than paper, and the evolution of identification standards make it necessary to revise ISO 8 to include recommendations applicable to all possible media as well as to develop recommendations specifically to address the complexity of digital publications. For example, this standard recognizes the new need to embed both human-readable and machine-readable metadata in publications. This revised standard is based in part on the 1977 ISO 8 standard for its recommendations pertaining to print periodicals and on a NISO document, PIE-J, or “Recommended Practices for the Presentation and Identification of E-Journals” (NISO RP-16-2013) for its recommendations concerning digital periodicals.

This Standard is applicable to continuing publications identifiable as “periodicals” (see below Terms and definitions). Newspapers are not generally considered to be periodicals and therefore specialized information relevant only to newspapers is not included. This Standard does not specifically address or apply to books, including series of books, nor to content that is continuously updated such as databases, loose-leaf services, online reference works, and most websites. Nevertheless, many of the recommendations about titles, identifiers, and digitization processes may be applicable to newspapers as well as to other kinds of continuing print and online publications.

This International Standard contains recommendations intended to enable editors and publishers of periodicals to identify and present key information in a form that will help users discover, cite and access their information over time and through any changes. Following these recommendations should also help editors and publishers to better understand the needs of researchers, librarians, and other users and to bring clarity to their own work. Application of the recommendations offered here will result in improved discovery and access for users and machines. This will benefit all stakeholders of the periodical supply chain: publishers, providers, authors, librarians, and researchers. Authors’ work will not be lost due to well-meaning but historically inaccurate citations; researchers will find the information that they need; librarians will have better control of their collections; and providers and publishers will benefit from increased use of their publications.

Presentation and identification of periodicals is a broad and detailed topic but this Standard has a deliberately narrow focus on only those elements of periodicals—printed, born digital or retroactively digitized—that relate to the presentation of title and supporting descriptive information, plus practices related to title identification and content access over time. Therefore, this Standard is not concerned with the overall design of the periodical, except where that design affects the presentation of the title, and has unintended consequences for resource discovery and access to earlier content. The recommendations are of varying importance and may not always accommodate certain artistic, technical or advertising considerations.

The recommendations address the following:
- Display of periodical title(s) and other critical identifying information: issues, numbering systems, pagination, etc.
- Retention of title and citation information under which articles were originally published.
- Display of title histories, including information relating to title changes.
- Embedding appropriate metadata into digital versions.
- Display of correct ISSN, including different ISSN for each format and for changed titles.
- Retention and display of vital publication information across the history of a periodical, including publisher names; clear numbering and dates; editors, editorial boards, and sponsoring organizations; and frequency of publication.
- Graphic design that supports clarity and consistency of information, particularly title information and inclusion of information that allows easy access to all content.

Special considerations for retrospective digitization.

Your voting options are:

Approval [comments optional]
Approval with corrections [comments required]
Disapproval [comments required and should be substantive]
Abstain from voting [comments optional]


Comments due by 9/28/2017




-------------- next part --------------

   Folks

   Here are some votes coming due in December (relevant documents attached)

   Mark

1) ISO TC 46/SC 11 ISO/FDIS 17068, Information and documentation -- Trusted
third party repository for digital records

   Do you approve the technical content of the final draft?
   This document specifies requirements for a trusted third party repository
   (TTPR) to support the authorized custody service in order to safeguard
   provable integrity and authenticity of clients’ digital records and serve as
   a source of reliable evidence.
   This document is applicable to retention or repository services for digital
   records  as a source of evidence during the retention periods of legal
   obligation in both the private and the public sectors.
   This document has the limitation that the authorized custody of the stored
   records is between only the TTPR and the client.
   Your voting options are:
   Approval [comments optional]
   Approval with corrections [comments required]
   Disapproval [comments required and should be substantive]
   Abstain from voting [comments optional]

   Comments due by 9/14/2017

2) SHORT-TERM BALLOT: TC46 SC11 N1700 Establish Liaison to ISO PC 302
Guidelines for auditing management systems

    you agree to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302 Guidelines for auditing
   management systems and to nominate Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison
   officer?
   TC46  SC11 agreed to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for
   auditing management systems to have the opportunity to review the ongoing
   work in this project committee to revise ISO 19011.
   Question 1
   Do you agree to establish a liaison to ISO/PC 302 Guidelines for auditing
   management systems?
   Question 2
   Do you agree to the nomination of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison
   officer for ISO/PC 302?
   You have three voting options for each of the above questions.
   Question 1 options:
   I agree with establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for auditing
   management systems. (Comment optional)
   I disagree with establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines for
   auditing management systems. (Comment required)
   I abstain from voting on establishing a liaison with ISO/PC 302, Guidelines
   for auditing management systems. (Comment optional)
   Question 2 options:
   I agree with the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison officer
   for ISO/PC 302. (Comment optional)
   I disagree with the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the liaison
   officer for ISO/PC 302. (Comment required)
   I abstain from voting on the appointment of Carlota Bustelo (UNE) as the
   liaison officer for ISO/PC 302. (Comment optional)

   Comments due by 9/26/2017

3) NISO Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag Suite

   Do you approve this new standard (NISO Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag
   Suite) for publication as an American National Standard?
   This voting pool is to approve the publication of the new standard NISO
   Z39.102-201X, STS: Standards Tag Suite, as an American National Standard.
   The Standards Tag Suite (STS) provides a common XML format that developers,
   publishers, and distributors of standards, including national standards
   bodies,  regional  and  international  standards bodies, and standards
   development organizations, can use to publish and exchange full-text content
   and  metadata  of  standards. STS is based on ANSI/NISO Z39.96 (JATS).
   Structures are provided to encode both the normative and non-normative
   content of: standards, adoptions of standards, and standards-like documents
   that are produced by standards organizations.
   Your voting options are:
   Yes -- approve for publication as an American National Standard
   No -- do not approve for publication
   Abstain from voting
   Comments are required for No and Abstain votes.
   Comments due 9/27/2017

4) ISO CD 8.2, Information and documentation - Presentation of Periodicals

   Do you approve the circulation of the draft as a DIS (Draft International
   Standard?
   Periodicals, whatever their medium, play a critical role in the information
   society, and more specifically in the global information infrastructure.
   Citations  to  articles  in scholarly journals, whether in print or in
   e-journals,  form the basis for much scholarly research. Popular trade
   magazines as well as newsletters are used by authors, researchers, and
   students  of all ages. Search, discovery, and use of the wide range of
   today’s periodicals requires that they provide reliable identification and
   display  of  key  information by following standardized principles and
   procedures.
   Publishers and providers have long taken great pride in the diverse designs
   of their products. Nonetheless, designers and publishers may be unaware that
   some of their practices are impeding identification of their publications
   and access to the contents. The advent of digital publishing has provided
   even more opportunity for creativity in design, as well as the ability to
   change the look and feel of a digital publication both retrospectively and
   prospectively.  Therefore, the presentation of information for digital
   publications has become even more critical: depending on the way the website
   is organized and the contents are linked together, the end user’s task of
   discovering  articles  and  accessing  them  may  turn out to be easy,
   frustrating, or completely fruitless.
   In 1954 when ISO Recommendation R8-1954, the predecessor to ISO 8: 1977, was
   published, there was no such thing as digital publishing, nor were there
   identification  standards such as ISSN or ISBN. ISO 8 was also focused
   exclusively on print periodicals. It was published at a time when the ISSN
   was still in its infancy. The evolution of the publishing market in recent
   decades,  the  use  of  media  other  than paper, and the evolution of
   identification  standards make it necessary to revise ISO 8 to include
   recommendations applicable to all possible media as well as to develop
   recommendations  specifically  to  address  the  complexity of digital
   publications. For example, this standard recognizes the new need to embed
   both human-readable and machine-readable metadata in publications. This
   revised  standard  is based in part on the 1977 ISO 8 standard for its
   recommendations pertaining to print periodicals and on a NISO document,
   PIE-J, or “Recommended Practices for the Presentation and Identification of
   E-Journals” (NISO RP-16-2013) for its recommendations concerning digital
   periodicals.
   This Standard is applicable to continuing publications identifiable as
   “periodicals”  (see  below  Terms and definitions). Newspapers are not
   generally considered to be periodicals and therefore specialized information
   relevant  only  to  newspapers is not included. This Standard does not
   specifically address or apply to books, including series of books, nor to
   content that is continuously updated such as databases, loose-leaf services,
   online  reference  works, and most websites. Nevertheless, many of the
   recommendations about titles, identifiers, and digitization processes may be
   applicable to newspapers as well as to other kinds of continuing print and
   online publications.
   This International Standard contains recommendations intended to enable
   editors  and  publishers  of  periodicals  to identify and present key
   information in a form that will help users discover, cite and access their
   information  over  time  and  through  any  changes.  Following  these
   recommendations should also help editors and publishers to better understand
   the needs of researchers, librarians, and other users and to bring clarity
   to their own work. Application of the recommendations offered here will
   result in improved discovery and access for users and machines. This will
   benefit  all  stakeholders of the periodical supply chain: publishers,
   providers, authors, librarians, and researchers. Authors’ work will not be
   lost due to well-meaning but historically inaccurate citations; researchers
   will  find the information that they need; librarians will have better
   control of their collections; and providers and publishers will benefit from
   increased use of their publications.
   Presentation and identification of periodicals is a broad and detailed topic
   but this Standard has a deliberately narrow focus on only those elements of
   periodicals—printed, born digital or retroactively digitized—that relate to
   the presentation of title and supporting descriptive information, plus
   practices related to title identification and content access over time.
   Therefore, this Standard is not concerned with the overall design of the
   periodical, except where that design affects the presentation of the title,
   and has unintended consequences for resource discovery and access to earlier
   content. The recommendations are of varying importance and may not always
   accommodate certain artistic, technical or advertising considerations.
   The recommendations address the following:
   - Display of periodical title(s) and other critical identifying information:
   issues, numbering systems, pagination, etc.
   - Retention of title and citation information under which articles were
   originally published.
   -  Display of title histories, including information relating to title
   changes.
   - Embedding appropriate metadata into digital versions.
   - Display of correct ISSN, including different ISSN for each format and for
   changed titles.
   - Retention and display of vital publication information across the history
   of a periodical, including publisher names; clear numbering and dates;
   editors, editorial boards, and sponsoring organizations; and frequency of
   publication.
   - Graphic design that supports clarity and consistency of information,
   particularly title information and inclusion of information that allows easy
   access to all content.
   Special considerations for retrospective digitization.
   Your voting options are:
   Approval [comments optional]
   Approval with corrections [comments required]
   Disapproval [comments required and should be substantive]
   Abstain from voting [comments optional]
   Comments due by 9/28/2017
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ISO_TC46_SC11_ISO_FDIS_17068_(E).pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1012153 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/asis-standards/attachments/20170908/dad857bf/attachment-0004.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ISO-TC46-SC11_N1700_Establish_Liaison_to_ISO_PC_302_Guidelines_for_auditing_management_systems.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 35249 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/asis-standards/attachments/20170908/dad857bf/attachment-0005.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NISO_Z39.102-201x_STS_Standards_Tag_Suite_[final for approval].pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1252546 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/asis-standards/attachments/20170908/dad857bf/attachment-0006.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: N2668, ISO TC 46 CD 8, Information and documentation - Presentation and identification of periodicals.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 734115 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/asis-standards/attachments/20170908/dad857bf/attachment-0007.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------





More information about the Asis-standards mailing list