[Asis-standards] NISO votes

[Mark Needleman]

Gail

i tend to agree but since I was on the committee that developed the original version of NCIP i plan on reviewing the documents this week - the original version was very complicated and hard to wade through - i think at minimum NISO should include a list of wants been changed to help folks who implemented the original version

mark
On Jun 17, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Thornburg,Gail wrote:

> I've no objections
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asis-standards-bounces at asis.org
> [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Baden Hughes
> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 1:16 AM
> To: Mark Needleman
> Cc: asis-standards at asis.org
> Subject: Re: [Asis-standards] NISO votes
> 
> Unless there are strong objections from others I'm suggesting we vote
> Yes for both of these.
> 
> They're under Continuous Maintenance (which I see as a positive) but
> its been a long time since they were actually ratified and they are
> actively deployed in practice by vendors.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Baden
> 
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu>
> wrote:
>> 
>> 2 votes have opened up in NISO
>> 
>> 1) "NISO Z39.83-1-201x, NISO Circulation Interchange Part 1: Protocol
>> (NCIP), version 2.02
>> 
>> Due 6/25
>> 
>> Options:
>> 
>> Yes
>> No
>> Abstain
>> 
>> 2) "NISO Z39.83-2-201X, NISO Circulation Interchange Protocol (NCIP)
> Part 2:
>> Implementation Profile 1"
>> 
>> Due 6/25
>> 
>> Options;
>> 
>> Yes
>> No
>> Abstain
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asis-standards mailing list
>> Asis-standards at asis.org
>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
> 
> 
>