[Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?
Pikas, Christina K.
Christina.Pikas at jhuapl.edu
Thu Oct 1 12:22:15 EDT 2015
I don't know if anyone has mentioned it, but there has been a concerted effort to add more Chinese content to both WoS and Scopus in the past few years. Perhaps using CNKI for China would be better? But then what would you use for the US?
From: SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Bosman, J.M. (Jeroen)
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 12:28 PM
To: 'SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org'
Subject: Re: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?
This is a simple count by Scopus limited to articles and reviews. It includes all papers with at least one author from the USA or China. So yes, still growing, also relatively. But no, no full catch up yet.
What interests me is why the catch up moment would be important. Is that merely symbolic, or something else?
year
USA
China
China as % of USA
2015
357612
242061
68%
2014
588479
352062
60%
2013
614184
322672
53%
2012
615353
276773
45%
2011
597977
247078
41%
2010
576215
223825
39%
2009
549322
211592
39%
2008
513175
189200
37%
2007
501885
169882
34%
2006
503899
156254
31%
2005
483530
132297
27%
2004
432862
90287
21%
2003
390198
59400
15%
2002
348260
50084
14%
2001
329304
53080
16%
2000
333300
41556
12%
total
7735555
2818103
36%
Best,
Jeroen
[101-innovations-icon-very-small] 101 innovations: tools database<http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list> | survey<https://101innovations.wordpress.com/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeroen Bosman, faculty liaison for the Faculty of Geosciences
Utrecht University Library<http://www.uu.nl/library>
email: j.bosman at uu.nl<mailto:j.bosman at uu.nl>
telephone: +31.30.2536613
mail: Postbus 80124, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
visiting address: room 2.50, Heidelberglaan 3, Utrecht
web: Jeroen Bosman<http://www.uu.nl/university/library/en/disciplines/geo/Pages/ContactBosman.aspx>
twitter @jeroenbosman/ @geolibrarianUBU
profiles: : Academia<http://uu.academia.edu/JeroenBosman> / Google Scholar<http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=-IfPy3IAAAAJ&hl=en> / ISNI<http://www.isni.org/0000000028810209> /
Mendeley<http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/jeroen-bosman/> / MicrosoftAcademic<http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/51538592/jeroen-bosman> / ORCID<http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2727> / ResearcherID<http://www.researcherid.com/ProfileView.action?queryString=KG0UuZjN5WmCiHc%252FMC4oLVEKrQQu%252BpzQ8%252F9yrRrmi8Y%253D&Init=Yes&SrcApp=CR&returnCode=ROUTER.Success&SID=N27lOD6EgipnADLnAbK> /
ResearchGate<http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeroen_Bosman/> / Scopus<http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=7003519484> / Slideshare<http://www.slideshare.net/hierohiero> / VIAF<http://viaf.org/viaf/36099266/> / Worldcat<http://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/lccn-n91-100619>
blogging at: I&M 2.0<http://im2punt0.wordpress.com/> / Ref4UU<http://ref4uu.blogspot.com/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trees say printing is a thing of the past
-----Original Message-----
From: SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of David Wojick
Sent: maandag 28 september 2015 16:40
To: sigmetrics at mail.asis.org<mailto:sigmetrics at mail.asis.org>
Subject: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?
How does the present Chinese journal article output compare to the US? I recall discussions here some time ago about the Chinese output catching up with the US. Has it done so? Is it still growing?
David
_______________________________________________
SIGMETRICS mailing list
SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org<mailto:SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org>
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151001/9afde705/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 995 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151001/9afde705/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list