[Sigmetrics] Papers of possible interest to readers of the SIG-Metrics List (August 30, 2015)

Sun Aug 30 18:19:36 EDT 2015

  =============================================================

*View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000359143200008
*Order Full Text [ ]

Title:
Mapping of important international academic awards

Authors:
Zheng, JT; Liu, NC

Author Full Names:
Zheng, Juntao; Liu, Niancai

Source:
SCIENTOMETRICS, 104 (3):763-791; 10.1007/s11192-015-1613-7 SEP 2015 

Language:
English

Document Type:
Article

Author Keywords:
International academic award, Reputation survey, Co-awardees, Mapping

KeyWords Plus:
NOBEL-PRIZES; SIMILARITY MEASURES; SCIENCE; PROLIFERATION; INSTITUTIONS

Abstract: 
International academic awards are popular as incentives and rewards for
academics all over the world, and have played a significant role in the
performance evaluations of individuals and institutions. However, little
is known about the relative importance of awards and the relationships
between awards. This study aims to establish a comprehensive global map
of important international academic awards, which visually presents the
relative reputations of awards and the close or distant relationships
between awards. By surveying the reputations of the preselected 207
awards, 90 important international academic awards with above-average
reputations were identified. Then, based on the number of "awardees in
common" or named "co-awardees" between every pair of these 90 awards, a
network of co-awardees was built. Finally, using mapping software of
VOSviewer, these 90 important international academic awards were mapped
by taking the reputation scores as the weights of awards and the network
of co-awardees as the basis of the relationships between awards.

Addresses:
[Zheng, Juntao; Liu, Niancai] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China. 

E-mail Addresses:
zjzj0009207 at sjtu.edu.cn; ncliu at sjtu.edu.cn

Cited Reference Count:
31

Times Cited:
0

Publisher:
SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS

ISSN:
0138-9130

eISSN:
1588-2861

Web of Science Categories:
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science

Research Areas:
Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science

IDS Number:
CO4PO

Unique ID: 
WOS:000359143200008

Cited References: 
Borner K, 2003, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V37, P179
Van Eck Nees Jan, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, V15, P625
Frey B. S., 2008, Academics appreciate awards-a new aspect of incentives in research, 
Small H, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V50, P799
MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56
MERTON RK, 1957, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V22, P635
van Eck Nees Jan, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1635
Charlton Bruce G., 2007, MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, V69, P1
ZUCKERMAN H, 1992, THEORETICAL MEDICINE, V13, P217
Cole J., 1973, Social stratification in science, 
Charlton Bruce G., 2007, MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, V68, P1191
Frey B. S., 2009, Perspectives in moral science, P177
Frey Bruno S., 2008, ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, V216, P198
Cobo M. J., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1382
PETERS HPF, 1993, RESEARCH POLICY, V22, P23
The US National Research Council Committee on an Assessment of Research Doctorate Programs, 2011, A data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States, 
Zitt M, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P627
Mahassen N., 2014, A Quantitative approach to world university rankings, 
van Eck Nees Jan, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523
KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10
Waltman Ludo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P2419
Frey B. S., 2010, CESifo working paper: 3229, 
Frey Bruno S., 2006, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V1, P377
Waltman Ludo, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P629
Liu Nian C., 2005, Higher Education in Europe, V30, P127
Best Joel, 2008, SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, V23, P1
Billaut Jean-Charles, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P237
Van Eck N. J., 2007, No.ERS-2006-020-LIS, 
Sternitzke Christian, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V78, P113
Zuckerman H., 1995, Scientific elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, 
Charlton Bruce G., 2007, MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, V68, P931

========================================================================

*Record 5 of 11. 
*View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000359143200007
*Order Full Text [ ]

Title:
Detecting the intellectual structure of library and information science based on formal concept analysis

Authors:
Liu, P; Wu, Q; Mu, XM; Yu, KP; Guo, YT

Author Full Names:
Liu, Ping; Wu, Qiong; Mu, Xiangming; Yu, Kaipeng; Guo, Yiting

Source:
SCIENTOMETRICS, 104 (3):737-762; 10.1007/s11192-015-1629-z SEP 2015 

Language:
English

Document Type:
Article

Author Keywords:
Formal concept analysis, Intellectual structure, Library and information science

KeyWords Plus:
BIBLIOGRAPHIC-COUPLING ANALYSIS; AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; CONCEPT LATTICES; ALGORITHMS; EVOLUTION; WEB

Abstract: 
Detecting intellectual structure of a knowledge domain is valuable to
track the dynamics of scientific research. Formal concept analysis (FCA)
provides a new perspective for knowledge discovery and data mining. In
this paper we introduce a FCA-based approach to detect intellectual
structure of library and information science (LIS). Our approach relies
on the mathematical theory which formulates the understanding of
"concept" as a unit of extension (scholars) and intension (keywords) as
a way of modelling the intellectual structure of a domain. By analyzing
the papers published in sixteen prominent journals of LIS domain from
2001 to 2013, the intellectual structure of LIS in the new century has
been identified and visualized. Nine major research themes of LIS were
detected together with the core keywords and authors to describe each
theme. The significant advantage of our approach is that the
mathematical formulae produce a conceptual structure which automatically
provides generalization and specialization relationships among the
concepts. This provides additional information not available from other
methods, especially when shared interests of authors from different
granularities are also visualized in concept lattice.

Addresses:
[Liu, Ping; Wu, Qiong; Yu, Kaipeng; Guo, Yiting] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China. 
[Mu, Xiangming] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53102 USA. 

E-mail Addresses:
p.liu at whu.edu.cn

Funding Acknowledgement:
National Natural Science Foundation of China [71203164]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Wuhan University) [2012GSP058]

Funding Text:
This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71203164) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2012GSP058, Wuhan University).

Cited Reference Count:
37

Times Cited:
0

Publisher:
SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS

ISSN:
0138-9130

eISSN:
1588-2861

Web of Science Categories:
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science

Research Areas:
Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science

IDS Number:
CO4PO

Unique ID: 
WOS:000359143200007

Cited References: 
strom F., 2007, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V58, P947
Lariviere Vincent, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P997
Chang Yu-Wei, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P22
Bagley P. R., 1968, University City Science Center technical report, 
Kedrov B. M., 1980, Philosophic Issues, V10, P85
Assefa Shimelis G., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P2513
Kuznetsov SO, 2002, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEInternational Workshop on Concept Lattice-Based Theory, Methods and Tools for KDD, JUL, 2001, STANFORD, CA, V14, P189
Thelwall Mike, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P1702
Bates M. J., 2010, Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 
Liu Zhihui, 2010, Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, V29, 
Wille R., 1982, Ordered Sets (Banff, Alta., 1981), V83, P445
Yin Z. M., 2009, Document, Information and Knowledge, V2009, P64
Mustafee Navonil, 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P2145
Chen Liang-Chu, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P867
Ganter B., 2012, Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations, P2012
PRICE DJD, 1965, NATURE, V206, P233
Gao Ji-ping, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V93, P459
Janssens Frizo, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1614
Moya-Anegon F, 2006, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P63
White HD, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P327
Milojevic Stasa, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1933
Ma Ruimin, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P532
Zhao Dangzhi, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P916
Hu Chang-Ping, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P657
Li Hai-Yan, 2010, ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, V16, P38
GODIN R, 1995, COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, V11, P246
Nicolai J. F., 2003, Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, V2003, P1
Wille R, 2005, FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS: FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS, V3626, P1
Ahlgren Per, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V76, P273
Hood WW, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V52, P291
WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163
Garfield E, 2004, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCEColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V30, P119
Zhao Dangzhi, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P2070
Zhu Q. H., 2008, Information Studies: Theory and Application, V31, P179
Hu Chang-Ping, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V97, P369
Solntseff N., 1974, Annual review in automatic programming, V7, P267
Yang Bo, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P239

========================================================================
  Web of Science Citation Alert

 Cited Article:    Borgman, C]]>. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics]]>
========================================================================

*Record 1 of 1. 
*View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000359056200004
*Order Full Text [ ]

Title:
Scholarly uses of TV content: bibliometric and content analysis of the information use environment

Authors:
Shim, J; Park, JH

Author Full Names:
Shim, Jiyoung; Park, Ji-Hong

Source:
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 71 (4):667-690; 10.1108/JD-04-2014-0062 2015 

Language:
English

Document Type:
Article

Author Keywords:
Information services, Information science, Documentation, Information studies

KeyWords Plus:
SEEKING BEHAVIOR; CITING BEHAVIOR; TELEVISION; COMMUNICATION; DISCIPLINES; RESEARCHERS; RETRIEVAL; ACCESS; TRENDS; NEEDS

Abstract: 
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the use of
television (TV) content for scholarly purposes. It focuses on: profile
of scholars using TV content; the structure of their need for TV
content; the situations in which scholars need TV content; and their
patterns of use of TV content in each research stage.
Design/methodology/approach - Taylor's four components of the
information use environment has contributed to the development of a
conceptual framework. The data from the use of TV content by 668
scholars were profiled using correspondence analysis and co-word
analysis. Additionally, the data from 15 interviews and content from 240
journal articles were analysed.
Findings - The authors determined that the environment of the scholarly
use of TV content is unique in terms of the scholars' academic domains,
research topics, motivation, and patterns of use. Six academic domains
were identified as having used TV content to a meaningful degree, and
their knowledge structure was presented as a map depicting the scholars'
needs for TV content. Scholars are likely to use TV content when they
deal with timely social and cultural topics, or human behaviour. The
scholars also showed different patterns of use of TV content at each
stage of research.
Originality/value - In this study, TV content was newly examined from
the perspective of an information source for scholarly purposes, and it
was found to be a meaningful source in several domains. This result
extends the knowledge of information sources in scholarly communication
and information services.

Addresses:
[Shim, Jiyoung; Park, Ji-Hong] Yonsei Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Seoul 120749, South Korea. 

E-mail Addresses:
jihongpark at yonsei.ac.kr

Funding Acknowledgement:
National Research Scholarship - Korea Student Aid Foundation [B00252]

Funding Text:
This work was supported by The National Research Scholarship (Humanities-Sciences Area) funded by the Korea Student Aid Foundation (B00252). This study was based on a doctoral dissertation from the Department of Library and Information Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Cited Reference Count:
77

Times Cited:
0

Publisher:
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED, HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND

ISSN:
0022-0418

eISSN:
1758-7379

Web of Science Categories:
Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science

Research Areas:
Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science

IDS Number:
CO3KN

Unique ID: 
WOS:000359056200004

Cited References: 
SAVOLAINEN R, 1995, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V17, P259
Stieg M. F., 1981, College & Research Libraries, V42, P549
Creswell J.W., 2009, Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 
DERVIN B, 1986, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V21, P3
Green E. L., 1993, Proceedings of the 17th International Online Information Meeting in London, Learned Information, Oxford, Oxford, P129
Hersberger Julie A., 2006, INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL6th Informational Seeking in Context Conference (ISIC), JUL 19-21, 2006, Sydney, AUSTRALIA, V12, 
Benzecri J.P., 1992, 
Bouma G. D., 2004, The Research Process, V5th, 
Capurro R, 2003, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V37, P343
ELLIS D, 1993, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V49, P356
Vargas-Quesada B., 2007, Visualizing the Structure of Science, 
RUBEN BD, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P15
Borgman C. L., 1990, Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, 
DOMINICK JR, 1976, JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, V26, P70
Battista G. D., 1999, Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs, 
BICHTELER J, 1989, SPECIAL LIBRARIES, V80, P169
Carpenter C. R., 1955, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V10, P606
Greenberg B., 1980, Life on Television: Content Analyses of US TV Drama, 
Batagelj V., 2012, Pajek: program for large network analysis (Version 3.01), 
Case D. O., 2012, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior, 
Clausen S. E., 1998, Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction, 
Small H., 1982, V3, P287
Shim J., 2013, An investigation on using TV contents for scholarly purposes, 
CANO V, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P284
Lunn B. K, 2009, Journal of Digital Information, V10, P1
Dalton MS, 2004, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V65, P400
Edy JA, 2005, JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, V82, P434
Dowman M., 2005, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web in Chiba, New York, NY, P225
McKechnie L.E.F., 2002, New Review of Information Behaviour Research, V3, 
Bouazza A., 1989, Encyclopedia of library and information science, V44, P144
McCreadie M, 1999, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V35, P45
Trochim W. M. K., 2008, Research Methods Knowledge Base, 
Julien Heidi, 2011, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V33, P19
Guba E. G., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, 
Frandsen Tove Faber, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P64
Bordewijk J. L., 1986, Intermedia, V14, P16
Buckland MK, 1997, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCEAnnual Meeting of the American-Society-for-Information-Science, OCT 08, 1995, CHICAGO, IL, V48, P804
Taylor Robert, 1991, Progress in Communication Science, V10, P217
BUCKLAND MK, 1991, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V42, P351
Jensen K. B., 1991, 
Krippendorff K., 2004, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 
GARVEY WD, 1972, INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL, V8, P123
Kompatsiaris D. Y., 2012, TV Content Analysis: Techniques and Applications, 
Agada J, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V50, P74
Kiernan V, 1999, Chronicle of Higher Education, V45, PA35
Kokaram A, 2006, IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, V23, P47
Lembo R., 2000, Thinking Through Television, 
Woolley JT, 2000, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, V44, P156
Pirmann C. M., 2009, Report commissioned by OCLC Research, 
Rubin Nan, 2009, LIBRARY TRENDS, V57, P393
White MD, 1997, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V67, P122
Creswell JW, 2000, THEORY INTO PRACTICE, V39, P124
Compton Margaret A., 2007, CINEMA JOURNAL, V46, P129
Borgman CL, 2002, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V36, P3
Altheide D. L., 2012, Qualitative Media Analysis, 
Kling R., 1997, Digital libraries and the practices of scholarly communication, 
Kim K.-D., 2002, A Research on the Actual Condition of Audio-Visual Materials and the Establishment of an Audio-Visual Archive Center in Relation to the Humanities, 
Talja S, 2003, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V59, P673
Jordan A., 2009, Media Messages and Public Health: A Decisions Approach to Content Analysis, 
Casserly MF, 2003, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V64, P300
Sugimoto Cassidy R., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P663
ELLIS D, 1989, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V45, P171
Head S. W., 1954, The Quarterly of Film Radio and Television, V9, P175
Smythe Dallas W., 1954, PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, V18, P143
Meho LI, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P570
RICHARDSON JM, 1990, JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, V16, P154
PAISLEY WJ, 1968, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V3, P1
WHITE MD, 1975, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V45, P337
McQuail D., 1997, Audience Analysis, 
Barcus F. E., 1983, Images of Life on Children's Television: Sex Roles, Minorities, and Families, 
Hjorland B., 1997, Information Seeking and Subject Representation: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science, 
Albrechtsen H., 1995, Journal of Documentation, V48, P400
Pogorzelski Wendy, 2007, JUDICATURE, V91, P124
Culbert D. H., 1974, The History Teacher, V8, P7
Rieh SY, 2004, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V55, P743
Wu Yejun, 2013, KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, V40, P283
Borner K, 2003, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V37, P179

========================================================================

*Record 1 of 2. 
*View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000359173300012
*Order Full Text [ ]

Title:
Identifying research fields within business and management: a journal cross-citation analysis

Authors:
Mingers, J; Leydesdorff, L

Author Full Names:
Mingers, John; Leydesdorff, Loet

Source:
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 66 (8):1370-1384; 10.1057/jors.2014.113 AUG 2015 

Language:
English

Document Type:
Article

Author Keywords:
subject fields, cross-citations, business and management, factor analysis

KeyWords Plus:
PEARSONS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISE; INDICATOR; QUALITY; IMPACT; SNIP; RANKINGS; INDEX

Abstract: 
A discipline such as business and management (B&M) is very broad and has
many fields within it, ranging from fairly scientific ones such as
management science or economics to softer ones such as information
systems. There are at least three reasons why it is important to
identify these sub-fields accurately. First, to give insight into the
structure of the subject area and identify perhaps unrecognised
commonalities; second, for the purpose of normalising citation data as
it is well-known that citation rates vary significantly between
different disciplines. And third, because journal rankings and lists
tend to split their classifications into different subjects-for example,
the Association of Business Schools list, which is a standard in the UK,
has 22 different fields. Unfortunately, at the moment these are created
in an ad-hoc manner with no underlying rigour. The purpose of this paper
is to identify possible sub-fields in B&M rigorously based on actual
citation patterns. We have examined 450 journals in B&M, which are
included in the ISI Web of Science and analysed the cross-citation rates
between them enabling us to generate sets of coherent and consistent
sub-fields that minimise the extent to which journals appear in several
categories. Implications and limitations of the analysis are discussed.

Addresses:
[Mingers, John] Univ Kent, Canterbury CT2 7PE, Kent, England. 
[Leydesdorff, Loet] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 

E-mail Addresses:
j.mingers at kent.ac.uk

Cited Reference Count:
45

Times Cited:
1

Publisher:
PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD, BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND

ISSN:
0160-5682

eISSN:
1476-9360

Web of Science Categories:
Management; Operations Research & Management Science

Research Areas:
Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science

IDS Number:
CO5AZ

Unique ID: 
WOS:000359173300012

Cited References: 
MOED HF, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P131
Rafols Ismael, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P1262
Boyack Kevin W., 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2011: THE 13TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 213th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI), JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, P123
van Raan A., 2011, Journal of Informetrics, V4, P431
Blondel Vincent D., 2008, JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 
Hair J. F., 1998, Multivariate data analysis with readings, 
Moed Henk F., 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P265
Rowlinson Michael, 2015, CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, V26, P2
Adler Nancy J., 2009, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V8, P72
RAE, 2005, Report, 
Mingers John, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1451
Leydesdorff L., 2010, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V62, P214
Leydesdorff Loet, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P278
Mingers John, 2012, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V48, P1078
Mingers John, 2014, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V8, P890
Macdonald Stuart, 2007, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V44, P640
Leydesdorff L, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V60, P159
RAE, 2009, Report, 
RAE, 2006, Report No. 01/2006, 
Van Raan Anthony F.J., 2003, Technikfolgenabschatzung, V1, P20
RAE, 2004, Report, 
Paul Ray J., 2008, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V17, P324
Leydesdorff L, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P601
Association of Business Schools, 2010, Academic journal quality guide, 
Salton G, 1987, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, 
Zhao H, 2010, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V47, P1
Rafols Ismael, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1823
Steinley D, 2004, PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, V9, P386
Leydesdorff Loet, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2365
Willmott Hugh, 2011, ORGANIZATION, V18, P429
Mingers John, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P613
Mingers John, 2013, HUMAN RELATIONS, V66, P1051
Morris M, 2009, Management Decision, V47, P1441
Rinia EJ, 1998, RESEARCH POLICY, V27, P95
Egghe Leo, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1027
Hoepner A, 2009, Accounting Education, V21, P3
Moed H, 2010, arXiv preprint, 
Morri H., 2011, Accounting Education: An International Journal, V20, P561
Waltman Ludo, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P272
Moed Henk F., 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P436
Hussain S., 2011, Accounting Education, V20, P545
Ahlgren P, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P550
Pudovkin AI, 2002, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V53, P1113
Paul Ray J., 2007, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V16, P193
Mingers John, 2013, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V49, P587

========================================================================

*Record 2 of 2. 
*View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000359056200009
*Order Full Text [ ]

Title:
The kaleidoscope of disciplinarity

Authors:
Sugimoto, CR; Weingart, S

Author Full Names:
Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Weingart, Scott

Source:
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 71 (4):775-794; 10.1108/JD-06-2014-0082 2015 

Language:
English

Document Type:
Article

Author Keywords:
Publishing, Epistemology, Documentation

KeyWords Plus:
INFORMATION-SCIENCE; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; BIRTH; KNOWLEDGE; COLLABORATION; LIBRARY; MULTIDISCIPLINARITY; SPECIALTIES; INDICATORS; PATTERNS

Abstract: 
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify criteria for and
definitions of disciplinarity, and how they differ between different
types of literature.
Design/methodology/approach - This synthesis is achieved through a
purposive review of three types of literature: explicit
conceptualizations of disciplinarity; narrative histories of
disciplines; and operationalizations of disciplinarity.
Findings - Each angle of discussing disciplinarity presents distinct
criteria. However, there are a few common axes upon which
conceptualizations, disciplinary narratives, and measurements revolve:
communication, social features, topical coherence, and institutions.
Originality/value - There is considerable ambiguity in the concept of a
discipline. This is of particular concern in a heightened assessment
culture, where decisions about funding and resource allocation are often
discipline-dependent (or focussed exclusively on interdisciplinary
endeavors). This work explores the varied nature of disciplinarity and,
through synthesis of the literature, presents a framework of criteria
that can be used to guide science policy makers, scientometricians,
administrators, and others interested in defining, constructing, and
evaluating disciplines.

Addresses:
[Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Weingart, Scott] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Sch Informat & Comp, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA. 

E-mail Addresses:
sugimoto at indiana.edu

Cited Reference Count:
90

Times Cited:
0

Publisher:
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED, HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND

ISSN:
0022-0418

eISSN:
1758-7379

Web of Science Categories:
Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science

Research Areas:
Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science

IDS Number:
CO3KN

Unique ID: 
WOS:000359056200009

Cited References: 
Abbott A. D., 1999, Department & Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred, 
Geiger R. L., 2004, To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, P1900
Graham L., 1983, Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories, 
Lave J., 1991, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral practice, 
Morillo F, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P203
Rinia EJ, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V54, P347
CHUBIN DE, 1984, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V35, P360
STAR SL, 1989, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V19, P387
Buker E. A., 2003, NWSA J, V15, P73
Morillo F, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P1237
BENJAMIN CG, 1974, SCIENCE, V183, P282
Hyland K., 2004, Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing, 
Bowman Timothy D., 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V101, P1695
Tageldin Shaden M., 2010, COMPARATIVE LITERATURE STUDIES, V47, P417
Gunawardena S, 2010, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, V51, P210
Strick JE, 2004, JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF BIOLOGY, V37, P131
Gilbert SF, 2003, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, V47, P467
Rafols I., 2006, Diversity measures and network centralities as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience, 
Rinia EJ, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P293
Miller M., 2004, V27, 
Vassileva I., 2008, Linguistics in an Age of Globalization, P167
Wouters P., 2013, Bibliometrics of Individual Researchers, 
Milojevic Stasa, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1933
Jacobs J. A., 2014, In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University, 
McCray W. Patrick, 2007, NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, V2, P259
Bordons M, 2004, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND PATENT STATISTICS IN STUDIES OF S&T SYSTEMS, P437
BOWKER G, 1987, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V17, P715
Porter Alan L., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P719
Bulick S, 1982, Books in Library and Information Science, 
COLE S, 1983, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V89, P111
van den Besselaar P, 1996, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V47, P415
Dascal M., 1996, P746
Porter Alan L., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P117
Schummer J, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P425
Raff RA, 1999, EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT, V1, P1
Ouzounis CA, 2003, BIOINFORMATICS, V19, P2176
Sugimoto Cassidy R., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1808
Tomov DT, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS4th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, OCT 05-07, 1995, ANTWERP, BELGIUM, V37, P267
Amariglio J., 1993, Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, P150
Nissani M, 1995, J Educ Thought, V29, P119
Pudovkin AI, 2002, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V53, P1113
Fry J, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P299
BIGGS M, 1991, JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P188
Bordons M, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS7th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 05-08, 1999, COLIMA, MEXICO, V46, P383
Becher T., 2001, Academic Tribes And Territories: Intellectual Enquiry And the Culture of Disciplines, V2nd, 
Foucault M., 1977, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, 
GARFIELD E, 1979, SCIENTOMETRICS, V1, P359
Heimeriks G., 2001, 8th Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Sydney, 
Belsey J., 1997, What is Evidence-Based Medicine?, 
Lattuca LR, 2002, JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, V73, P711
PRICE DJD, 1966, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V21, P1011
Lenoir T., 1997, Instituting Science, The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines, 
Rodee C. C., 1976, Introduction to Political Science, 
Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P87
Carayol N, 2005, RESEARCH EVALUATION8th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 23-25, 2004, Leiden, NETHERLANDS, V14, P70
Hunt L., 1994, Eighteenth-Century Stud., V28, P1
Burger Joseph R., 2012, PLOS BIOLOGY, V10, 
Nascimento Denise Morado, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P397
Rafols Ismael, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P263
SHUMWAY DR, 1991, POETICS TODAY, V12, P201
HARGENS LL, 1986, SCIENTOMETRICS, V9, P145
ACHESON RM, 1986, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V293, P1602
Von Eckardt B, 2001, COGNITIVE SCIENCE, V25, P453
Ekbia H. R., J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 
Dogan M., 2001, Int. Encycl. Soc. Behav. Sci, V22, 
Montgomery S. L., 2003, The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science, 
Knorr-Cetina K., 1999, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, 
De Mey M, 1982, The Cognitive Paradigm, 
Reid EOF, 1997, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V33, P91
Sylvan D., 1993, Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, P150
Singh P., 2010, Int. Community Law Rev., V12, P5
Nyquist J. D., 2002, Change, V34, P12
Ni Chaoqun, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P1161
Cronin B, 2005, The Hand Of Science: Academic Writing And Its Rewards, 
Braun T, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P183
Langfeldt Liv, 2006, RESEARCH EVALUATION14th Nordic-Political-Science-Assoiation Conference, AUG, 2005, Reykjavik, ICELAND, V15, P31
Whitley R., 2000, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, V2nd, 
2015, Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope, 
Bourdieu P., 1996, The Rules of Art, 
Guyotjeannin O., 1996, Am. Arch., V59, P414
Holland George Adam, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P7
Valenza R., 2009, Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciplines in Britain, V1st, P1680
Hjorland B, 2002, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V58, P422
WEART SR, 1988, PHYSICS TODAY, V41, P38
van Leeuwen T, 2000, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V9, P183
Bourdieu P., 1988, Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action, 
Tedre Matti, 2011, MINDS AND MACHINES, V21, P361
Krishnan A., 2009, What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate, 
Lariviere Vincent, 2014, BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, P187
Stone W. F., 1988, The Psychology of Politics, 

========================================================================