382 researchers with an h-index of 100 or larger
Isidro F. Aguillo
isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES
Mon Oct 27 11:46:03 EDT 2014
Dear Andreas,
Thanks for the suggestion. For the next edition we will prepare TWO
lists, one ranked by h-index, the second one by citations.
Best regards,
On 27/10/2014 16:21, Andreas Strotmann wrote:
> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
> Thank you very much, Isidro, for what should become a future text-book
> example for just how lousy a metric for researcher quality the h index
> is, not just for young scholars, but even for the most venerated
> classics. Let me just highlight Max Weber: ~ 10th by number of
> citations (as the founding father of modern sociology, a fitting
> place), but well below 200th place by h index (and since this ranking
> is highly incomplete - I'm missing Luhmann and Habermas amongst his
> colleagues, for example - he'd probably end up in the 300s in a
> complete ranking). When people are mostly cited for their books, as
> German sociologists are, their h-index is naturally and severely
> limited by the number of their publications, not citations.
>
> May I suggest, therefore, that you redo the ranking by numbers of
> citations rather than h-index?
>
> Best regards,
>
> -- Andreas Strotmann
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Isidro F. Aguillo
> <isidro.aguillo at cchs.csic.es <mailto:isidro.aguillo at cchs.csic.es>> wrote:
>
> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
> <http://web.utk.edu/%7Egwhitney/sigmetrics.html>
>
> A frequent criticism to the citation analysis stemmed from its
> alleged inability to evaluate the results of social scientists in
> general and the books as objects of scholarly communication in
> particular.
>
> For several years I have been working with Google Scholar, an
> alternative to the WoS and Scopus, and now I have evidence to show
> that the alleged bias of bibliometrics is probably the result of
> an incomplete and biased coverage of the sources used so far.
>
> I just published a ranking of the all-time most cited scientists
> (of all time) according to their public profiles in Google Scholar
> Citations. A list of the 382 entries with an h-index of 100 or
> larger is here:
>
> http://www.webometrics.info/en/node/58
>
> Although these profiles are built on a voluntary basis and it is
> far from complete, there are at least two very relevant patterns
> observed immediately:
> - A number of social scientists in positions of privilege. Some of
> the deceased ones show that the "impact" of their work endures in
> time far beyond 2 or 5 years.
> - The books are achieving in many cases citations exceeding the
> several thousand, so claiming their value as a tool for scientific
> communication
>
> A not so obvious corollary is the need of increasing the
> visibility of the output in Social Sciences and Humanities,
> profiting of the capabilities offered by the Open Access
> repositories and the social networks. Certainly not because of
> being under the new altmetrics indicators but to increase the
> number of citations and to reduce the time delay in the
> recognition of the contributions.
>
> --
>
> ************************************
> Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr.
> The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC
> Grupo Scimago
> Madrid. SPAIN
>
> isidro.aguillo at csic.es <mailto:isidro.aguillo at csic.es>
> ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873
> ResearcherID: A-7280-2008
> Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ
> Twitter @isidroaguillo
> Rankings Web webometrics.info <http://webometrics.info>
> ************************************
>
>
> ---
> Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de
> avast! Antivirus está activa.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
--
************************************
Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr.
The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC
Grupo Scimago
Madrid. SPAIN
isidro.aguillo at csic.es
ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873
ResearcherID: A-7280-2008
Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ
Twitter @isidroaguillo
Rankings Web webometrics.info
************************************
---
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20141027/984848f5/attachment.html>
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list