Diamond, AM. 2009. SCHUMPETER VS. KEYNES: "IN THE LONG RUN NOT ALL OF US ARE DEAD". JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT 31 (4): 531-541

[Eugene Garfield]

Diamond, AM. 2009. SCHUMPETER VS. KEYNES: "IN THE LONG RUN NOT ALL OF 
US ARE DEAD". JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT 31 (4): 
531-541.

Author Full Name(s): Diamond, Arthur M., Jr.

Language: English
Document Type: Article

Abstract: Keynes was viewed by himself, Schumpeter, and most others as the 
most highly esteemed economist of the twentieth century. However, 
Schumpeter is receiving increasing attention from mainstream economists. A 
few specific examples are discussed, and the citation time series for Keynes 
and Schumpeter are compared for the period 1956 through 2006. Generally, 
Keynes receives more citations than Schumpeter from 1956 through roughly the 
mid-1990s. But subsequently until 2006, Schumpeter received more citations 
than Keynes.

Addresses: Univ Nebraska, Dept Econ, Omaha, NE 68182 USA

Reprint Address: Diamond, AM, Univ Nebraska, Dept Econ, Omaha, NE 68182 
USA.

E-mail Address: adiamond at unomaha.edu

ISSN: 1053-8372
DOI: 10.1017/S1053837209990307
fulltext: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?
fromPage=online&aid=6773524&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S1053837209990307