Foo, JYA. 2009. EFFECT OF BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CLASSIFICATION ON THE IMPACT FACTOR OF SCIENCE- AND ENGINEERING-BASED JOURNALS. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 16 (1): 1-12

Eugene Garfield eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM
Sun Aug 1 20:15:30 EDT 2010


 26 Cited References for the posting of article on:
Title: EFFECT OF BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CLASSIFICATION ON THE IMPACT FACTOR OF
SCIENCE- AND ENGINEERING-BASED JOURNALS 
Author(s): Foo, JYA
Source: ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Volume: 16 Issue: 1 Pages: 1 Published: 2009 
 Citation Map  

 
  
       
  

1.  ADAM D
The counting house 
NATURE 415 : 726 2002 
2.  ALBERT DM
Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing - Responsibilities
of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals 
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 123 : 684 2005 
3.  ATLAS MC
Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact
biomedical journals 
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 91 : 442 2003 
4.  BROWN H
How impact factors changed medical publishing - and science 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 334 : 561 2007 
5.  CALLAHAM M
Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated
with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 : 2847 2002 
6.  CHEW M
Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends
for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views 
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 100 : 142 2007 
7.  DEMARIA AN
A report card for journals 
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 42 : 952 DOI
10.1016/S0735-1097(03)01001-5 2003 
8.  FASSOULAKI A
Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in
determining the impact factor 
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 84 : 266 2000 
9.  GAMI AS
Author self-citation in the diabetes literature 
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 170 : 1925 2004 
10.  GARFIELD E
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 295 : 90 2006 
11.  GOLUBIC R
Calculating impact factor: How bibliographical classification of journal
items affects the impact factor of large and small journals 
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 14 : 41 DOI 10.1007/s11948-007-9044-3
2008 
12.  HEMMINGSSON A
Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals 
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 178 : 767 2002 
13.  HIRSCH JE
Does the h index have predictive power? 
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA 104 : 19193 DOI 10.1073/pnas.0707962104 2007 
14.  HOBBS R
Should we ditch impact factors? No 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 334 : 569 2007 
15.  HYLAND K
Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic
publication 
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
54 : 251 DOI 10.1002/asi.10204 2003 
16.  IOANNIDIS JPA
Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical
research 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 294 : 218 2005 
17.  JOSEPH KS
Quality of impact factors of general medical journals 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326 : 283 2003 
18.  KINNEY AL
National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical
research 
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA 104 : 17943 DOI 10.1073/pnas.0704416104 2007 
19.  NAKAYAMA T
Comparison between impact factors and citations in evidence-based
practice guidelines 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 290 : 755 2003 
20.  NIEMINEN P
BMC MED RES METHODOL 6 : 42 2006 
21.  REDMAN BK
ACCOUNT RES 13 : 247 2006 
22.  SEGLEN PO
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating
research 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 314 : 498 1997 
23.  SMITH R
BMJ 314 : 461 
24.  TRIKALINOS NA
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and
indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers 
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 61 : 464 DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.019 2008 
25.  WALTER G
MJA 178 : 280 
26.  WILLIAMS G
Should we ditch impact factors? Yes 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 334 : 568 2007 
              
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
References: 26                   Page  of 1          
  
 
 
  
 
   
     
 

 
 
 
 
   
   
 

-----Original Message-----
From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics
[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Garfield, Eugene
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 4:05 PM
To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU
Subject: [SIGMETRICS] Foo, JYA. 2009. EFFECT OF BIBLIOGRAPHICAL
CLASSIFICATION ON THE IMPACT FACTOR OF SCIENCE- AND ENGINEERING-BASED
JOURNALS. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 16
(1): 1-12


Foo, JYA. 2009. EFFECT OF BIBLIOGRAPHICAL CLASSIFICATION ON THE IMPACT 
FACTOR OF SCIENCE- AND ENGINEERING-BASED JOURNALS. ACCOUNTABILITY 
IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 16 (1): 1-12..

Author Full Name(s): Foo, Jong Yong Abdiel
Language: English
Document Type: Article

Abstract: The simplest and widely used assessment of academic research
and 
researchers is the journal impact factor (JIF). However, the JIF may
exhibit 
patterns that are skewed towards journals that publish high number of
non-
research items and short turnover research. Moreover, there are concerns
as 
the JIF is often used as a comparison for journals from different
disciplines. In 
this study, the JIF computation of eight top ranked journals from four
different 
subject categories was analyzed. The analysis reveals that most of the 
published items (> 65%) in the science disciplines were nonresearch
items while 
fewer such items (< 22%) were observed in engineering-based journals.
The 
single regression analysis confirmed that there is correlation (R-2 >=
.99) in the 
number of published items or citations received over the two-year period
used 
in the JIF calculation amongst the eight selected journals. A weighted
factor 
computation is introduced to compensate for the smaller journals and
journals 
that publish longer turnover research. It is hoped that the approach can

provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of a journal
regardless of 
the disciplinary field.

Addresses: [Foo, Jong Yong Abdiel] Singapore Gen Hosp, Div Res,
Singapore 
169608, Singapore; [Foo, Jong Yong Abdiel] Nanyang Technol Univ, Biomed 
Engn Res Ctr, Singapore, Singapore

Reprint Address: Foo, JYA, Singapore Gen Hosp, Div Res, 31 3rd Hosp 
Ave,Bowyer Block A,Level 3,Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore.

E-mail Address: foo.jong.yong at sgh.com.sg

ISSN: 0898-9621
DOI: 10.1080/08989620802689516
Fulltext: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/section?
content=a909104288&fulltext=713240928



More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list