Clark, T (Clark, Timothy); Wright, M (Wright, Mike) Reviewing journal rankings and revisiting peer reviews: Editorial perspectives JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 44 (4): 612-621 JUN 2007

[Eugene Garfield]

E-mail Address: Timothy.clark at durham.ac.uk 

Author(s): Clark, T (Clark, Timothy); Wright, M (Wright, Mike) 

Title: Reviewing journal rankings and revisiting peer reviews: Editorial 
perspectives 

Source: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 44 (4): 612-621 JUN 2007 

Language: English 

Document Type: Editorial Material 

Keywords Plus: AMERICAN-PSYCHOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; ARTICLES 

Addresses: Univ Durham, Durham Business Sch, Durham DH1 3LB, England; Univ 
Nottingham, Ctr Management Buyout Res, Sch Business, Nottingham NG7 2RD, 
England 

Reprint Address: Clark, T, Univ Durham, Durham Business Sch, Mill Hill 
Lane, Durham DH1 3LB, England. 

Cited Reference Count: 26 

Times Cited: 2 

Publisher: BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 

Publisher Address: 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND 

ISSN: 0022-2380 

BARLEY SR
When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting 
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL 49 : 16 2006 

BARUCH Y
IN PRESS OPENING BLA : 

BEDEIAN AG
ACAD MANAGEMENT LEAR 3 : 198 2004 

CAMPANARIO JM
Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1 
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19 : 181 1998 

CAMPANARIO JM
SCI COMMUN 16 : 304 1995 

CICCHETTI DV
RELIABILITY OF REVIEWS FOR THE AMERICAN-PSYCHOLOGIST - A BIOSTATISTICAL 
ASSESSMENT OF THE DATA 
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 35 : 300 1980 

CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A 
CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION 
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 : 119 1991 

CLARK T
On the review process and journal development 
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES 43 : 655 2006 

Liberating the markets for journal publications: Some specific options 
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES 44 : 628 2007 

GOODSTEIN LD
PEER COMMENTARY PEER : 28 1982 

GOTTFREDSON SD
EVALUATING PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH REPORTS - DIMENSIONS, RELIABILITY, AND 
CORRELATES OF QUALITY JUDGMENTS
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 33 : 920 1978 

HENDRICK C
PERSONALITY SOC PSYC 3 : 1 1977 

HILLMAN AJ
The future of double-blind review in management 
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES 44 : 622 2007 

JENSEN M
SEM NOTT U BUS SCH 1 : 2006 

KUHN TS
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU : 1962 

MACDONALD S
Ring a ring o' roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management 
studies 
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES 44 : 640 2007 

MERTON RK
SOCIOLOGY SCI : 1973 

MILLER CC
Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: Prevalence and 
effects of reviewer hostility, bias, and dissensus 
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL 49 : 425 2006 

PETERS DP
PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, 
PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN 
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 : 187 1982 

ROTHAERMEL F
IND CORPORATE CHANGE 16 : 2007 

SCARR S
RELIABILITY OF REVIEWS FOR AMERICAN-PSYCHOLOGIST
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 33 : 935 1978 

SCOTT WA
J PERS SOC PSYCHOL 29 : 698 1974 

STARBUCK WH
Turning lemons into lemonade - Where is the value in peer reviews? 
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY 12 : 344 DOI 10.1177/1056492603258972 2003 

STARBUCK WH
How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of 
academic publication 
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE 16 : 180 DOI 10.1287/orsc.1040.0107 2005 

SUTTON RI
WHAT THEORY IS NOT 
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY 40 : 371 1995 

WEICK KE
WHAT THEORY IS NOT, THEORIZING IS 
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY 40 : 385 1995