Zhiping, Y et al Profiles of technological capabilities of the chinese academy of sciences (CAS) - A comparison of patenting activities of the CAS with other national level institutions

Eugene Garfield garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Tue Jan 29 09:08:54 EST 2008


Email address: Yangzp at clas.ac.cn

Author(s): Zhiping, Y (Zhiping, Yang); Shu, F (Shu, Fang); Yunwei, C 
(Yunwei, Cheng); Chun, W (Chun, Wang); Yi, W (Yi, Wen); Zhengyi, H 
(Zhengyi, Hu); Yi, Z (Yi, Zheng) 

Title: Profiles of technological capabilities of the chinese academy of 
sciences (CAS) - A comparison of patenting activities of the CAS with 
other national level institutions 

Editor(s): TorresSalinas, D; Moed, HF 

Source: PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2007: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE 
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS I AND II 
776-782, 2007 

Language: English 
Document Type: Article 

Conference Title: 11th International Conference of the International-
Society-for-Scientrometrics-and-Informetrics 

Conference Date: JUN 25-27, 2007 

Conference Location: Madrid, SPAIN 

Conference Sponsors: Int Soc Scientrometr & Informetr, CSIC, Minist Educ & 
Ciencia, FECYT, Comunidad Madrid, Eugene Garfield Fdn, Thomson Sci, 
Elsevier, Journal Informetr, Scopus, Ayuntamiento Madrid, Sci Metrix, Univ 
Carlos III Madrid 

Author Keywords: patent quantitative analyse; patent family; technology 
field; technology cooperation; national institution 

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to compare patent activities within 
the Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS) with France National Center for 
Scientific Research(CNR) and Max Planck Society(MPS) which have the 
similar national role outside China based on patent statistic. The results 
suggest that CAS tended to file more patents in its home country, while 
CNRS and MPS showed the most interest in patenting aboard. The tendence of 
technology international markets for three institutions all was to 
Australia, United States, Europe and Japan. For technology priority areas, 
three institutions had the same preference in the pharmaceutical field. 
Comparable with other two institutions, CAS had less technology inventive 
and collaborative activities than other two institutions. Three 
institutions have presented patterns of cross-sectoral collaboration with 
industry and university. And CNRS showed the strongest technology 
cooperation capability in its home country. 

Addresses: Chinese Acad Sci, Chengdu Lib, Chengdu, 610041 Peoples R China. 

Publisher Name: INT SOC SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS-ISSI 
Publisher Address: KATHOLIEKE UNIV LEUVEN, FACULTEIT E T E W, DEKENSTRAAT 
2, LEUVEN, B-3000, BELGIUM 

Cited Reference Count: 15 

*DIAL CORP
PAT FAM SEARCH US DE  
 
 *FIZ KARLSR STN EU
TECHN ASS US PAT LIT   

 *LION NEST PAR PAT
NAT PATT TECHN ACC P : 2004  
 
 *NAT SCI FDN
SCI ENG INDICATORS 5 : 37 2004   

 ASHTON WB
EC POLICY ANAL OCCAS 60  
 
 ASPDEN H
WORLD PATENT INFORMA 5 : 170 1983 
  
 BACHMANN A
Profiles of corporate technological capabilities--a comparison of large 
British and German pharmaceutical companies
TECHNOVATION 18 : 593 1998 
  
 BHATTACHARYA S
Mapping inventive activity and technological change through patent 
analysis: A case study of India and China
SCIENTOMETRICS 61 : 361 2004
   
 CHOUNG JY
26 STEEP : 1995   

 DERWENT T
DERWENT ANAL VANTAGE : 2006   

 HAUPT R
CACTUS : 229 2005   

 LIN HY
TAIWAN EC RES MONTHL 25 : 23 2002   

 OKEEFE M
WORLD PATENT INFORM 27 : 125 2005 
  
 SCHMOCH U
FRANCOISE LAVILLE PA : 2003   

 YUN L
SCIENTOMETRICS 68 : 167 2006  



More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list