Ironside, PM (Ironside, Pamela M.) Advancing the science of nursing education: Rethinking the meaning and significance of impact factors - Guest editorial JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 46 (3): 99-100 MAR 2007
Eugene Garfield
garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Tue Aug 26 09:58:45 EDT 2008
- Previous message: Matias-Guiu, J (Matias-Guiu, J.); Garcia-Ramos, R (Garcia-Ramos, R.) The impact factor and editorial decisions NEUROLOGIA, 23 (6): 342-348 JUL-AUG 2008
- Next message: Higgins, A (Higgins, A.); Farrelly, M (Farrelly, M.) Peer-reviewed publication output of psychiatric nurses in the Republic of Ireland JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 14 (5): 495-502 AUG 2007
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Email Address: pamirons at iupui.edu
Author(s): Ironside, PM (Ironside, Pamela M.)
Title: Advancing the science of nursing education: Rethinking the meaning
and significance of impact factors - Guest editorial
Source: JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 46 (3): 99-100 MAR 2007
Excerpt: It is not the case that impact factors are unhelpful and that
their use should be abolished. Indeed, ISI is continuing to refine
existing and develop new databases to provide important information to
researchers, administrators, librarians and editors. Impact factor data
do provide useful information for the review process if used judiciously
and with an awareness of what these data do and do not indicate. Perhaps
it is timely for members of the nursing discipline to think more broadly
about the nature of impact and to talk more about the ways in which review
processes can account for the many ways the impact of research can be
demonstrated. For example, as part of the review process, reviewers might
ask each researcher to provide exemplars from teaching or clinical
practice settings in which their research is actually being used.
Researchers might also be asked to describe the impact that has occurred
in ways other that through publication (e.g., presentations, consulting)
and how this impact was determined. Creating review processes that allow
researchers to describe their decision making related to disseminating
their research and how this reflects their ability to influence the
discipline may provide a more realistic picture of impact than calculated
figures alone.
Language: English
Document Type: Editorial Material
Addresses: Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 47405 USA
Reprint Address: Ironside, PM, Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, Indianapolis, IN
47405 USA.
Cited Reference Count: 2
Times Cited: 0
Publisher: SLACK INC
Publisher Address: 6900 GROVE RD, THOROFARE, NJ 08086 USA
ISSN: 0148-4834
29-char Source Abbrev.: J NURS EDUC
ISO Source Abbrev.: J. Nurs. Educ.
Source Item Page Count: 2
Subject Category: Nursing
ISI Document Delivery No.: 146CY
*I SCI INF
ISI IMP FACT : 1994
GARFIELD E
AGONY ECSTASY HIST M : 2005
- Previous message: Matias-Guiu, J (Matias-Guiu, J.); Garcia-Ramos, R (Garcia-Ramos, R.) The impact factor and editorial decisions NEUROLOGIA, 23 (6): 342-348 JUL-AUG 2008
- Next message: Higgins, A (Higgins, A.); Farrelly, M (Farrelly, M.) Peer-reviewed publication output of psychiatric nurses in the Republic of Ireland JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 14 (5): 495-502 AUG 2007
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list