information and information structures

David E. Wojick dwojick at HUGHES.NET
Mon Apr 9 12:50:27 EDT 2007


Dear Loet,

I will look into this with interest. For my part, I agree that most 
of the information structures I am talking about can be represented 
as matrices, although I prefer to visualize them as linear, tree-like 
or network-like arrays, depending on the case. Each structure is 
defined by some relation or set of relations among the pieces of 
information. So far so good.

Given my definition of information, each piece of information is 
theoretically an atomic proposition. However, since the number of 
atomic propositions in a sentence is typically roughly equal to half 
the number of words, we usually work at a courser scale. Pieces of 
information may be sentences, whole documents, or even collections of 
documents.

As I explain, pieces of information can be related according to their 
propositions, their physical expressions, their referents (what the 
propositions are about), or a combination. For any given body of 
information there will usually be a large number of important 
relation types, so there are in fact many matirices of interest. And 
yes many of these change over time. In this context the matrices all 
exist, whether we know it or not. That is, how the information is 
related is a fact about the information, independent of our analysis.

Important relations (or matrices) in common use range from 
alphabetical order applied to some aspect of the expression, to the 
so-called topic, which is usually an aspect of what the information 
is about. Many popular categorization schemes merge and confuse what 
are actually different relations.

Probability does not enter into it so far as I can tell, so I am 
interested how this may relate to your matrices? Perhaps that has to 
do with the change over time?

Best wishes, David


Dear David,

In reaction to your paper entitled "Outline of a new model of 
information contents and structure," let me shortly react.

I would be inclined to think about information and information 
structures in terms of the dimensionality of the probability 
distribution. For example, a structure requires a network and thus a 
two-dimensional matrix can contain this information. An information 
system would additionally require that the structure is extended 
along the time axis and this would lead to matrices at each moment of 
time and thus a three-dimensional cube of information would be 
required. Unstructured information can be considered as a vector. One 
can extend beyond a three-dimensional array towards a hyper-cube of 
information.

In <http://www.leydesdorff.net/evolcomm/index.htm>The Evolution of 
Communication Systems, Int. J. Systems Research and Information 
Science 6 (1994) 219-30. I elaborated this scheme as follows:

Table I Organization of concepts in relation to degrees of freedom in 
the probability distribution

                 first           second          third 
fourth                                                                          
                 dimension       dimension       dimension       dimension 

operation       variation       selection       stabilization 
self-organization 

nature          entropy;        extension;      localized 
identity or                        
                 disturbance     network         trajectory      regime 

character       probabilistic;  deterministic;  reflexive;      globally 
of              uncertain       structural      reconstructiv   organized; 
operation                                                       resilient 

appearance      instantaneous   spatial;        historically 
hyper-cycle in                  
                 and volatile    multi-variate   contingent      space and time 

unit of         change in       latent          stabilities     virtual 
observation     terms of        positions       during 
expectations                     
                 relations                       history 

type of         descriptive     multi-variate   time-series     non-linear 
analysis        registration    analysis        analysis        dynamics

The complexity of the declared information system (the data) thus 
determines the type of analysis which is possible. (In my book The 
Sociology of Communication (2003), this scheme is discussed on pp. 99 
ff.)

With best wishes,


Loet

Loet Leydesdorff
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam
Tel.: +31-20- 525 6598; fax: +31-20- 525 3681
<mailto:loet at leydesdorff.net>loet at leydesdorff.net ; 
<http://www.leydesdorff.net/>http://www.leydesdorff.net/




From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics 
[mailto:SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu] On Behalf Of David E. Wojick
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 7:12 PM
To: SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu
Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] The communication of meaning in social 
systems; preprint version available

Dear Loet,

It is delightful to get something like this on a holiday. I take it 
this is what the phenomenology of meaning looks like these days. Not 
that I pretend to understand phenomenology, so please correct me if I 
am wrong. I also take it that the interpretation of the parameters in 
the very interesting equations, as well as the technical concepts 
being used, is to be found in the cited references.

Since I have also presented a theory of the nature of information 
here, I thought it appropriate that I speculate upon the difference 
between this body of work and my own.
CF: 
http://www.bydesign.com/powervision/Mathematics_Philosophy_Science/information.html

My work derives from the tradition of analytical philosophy and 
mathematical logic begun by Russell and Wittgenstein. I suggest that 
it is looking at meaning in a very narrow sense, as exemplified by 
the atomic proposition. The phenomenological tradition is looking at 
meaning in a very broad sense, what it is to be meaningful if you 
like.

The human condition is rich enough to accommodate both approaches and 
so I do not see any disagreement here between us. The question is if 
there is any connection?

Best regards,

David



<http://www.leydesdorff.net/meaning0704/index.htm>The communication 
of meaning in social systems

<http://www.leydesdorff.net/meaning0704/meaning0704.pdf> pdf-version

Abstract

The sociological domain is different from the psychological one 
insofar as meaning can be communicated at the supra-individual level 
(Schütz, 1932; Luhmann, 1984). The computation of anticipatory 
systems enables us to distinguish between these domains in terms of 
weakly and strongly anticipatory systems with a structural coupling 
between them (Maturana, 1978). Anticipatory systems have been defined 
as systems which entertain models of themselves (Rosen, 1984). The 
model provides meaning to the modeled system from the perspective of 
hindsight, that is, by advancing along the time axis towards possible 
future states. Strongly anticipatory systems construct their own 
future states (Dubois, 1998a and b). The dynamics of weak and strong 
anticipations can be simulated as incursion and hyper-incursion, 
respectively. Hyper-incursion generates “horizons of meaning” 
(Husserl, 1929) among which choices have to be made by incursive 
agency.


Loet Leydesdorff & Sander Franse

Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam
Tel.: +31-20- 525 6598; fax: +31-20- 525 3681
<mailto:loet at leydesdorff.net>loet at leydesdorff.net ; 
<http://www.leydesdorff.net/>http://www.leydesdorff.net/

Now available: 
<http://www.universal-publishers.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1581129378>The 
Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. 385 pp.; US$ 
18.95 
<http://www.universal-publishers.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1581126956>The 
Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society; 
<http://www.universal-publishers.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1581126816>The 
Challenge of Scientometrics





--

"David E. Wojick, Ph.D." <WojickD at osti.gov>
Senior Consultant -- The DOE Science Accelerator 
http://www.osti.gov/innovation/scienceaccelerator.pdf
http://www.osti.gov/innovation/
A strategic initiative of the Office of Scientific and Technical 
Information, US Department of Energy

(540) 858-3150
391 Flickertail Lane, Star Tannery, VA 22654 USA
http://www.bydesign.com/powervision/resume.html provides my bio and 
client list.
http://www.bydesign.com/powervision/Mathematics_Philosophy_Science/ 
presents some of my own research on information structure and 
dynamics.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20070409/aa1a3568/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: att1bec1.gif_2.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1101 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20070409/aa1a3568/attachment.gif>


More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list