Structured abstracts

[J. Hartley]

Peter

Here it is!

There may be some confusion because I thought I had already sent it to you
with a message asking if you were the Peter Jacso of Tenopir and Jacso - a
paper I often cite!  (I sent this message to another Peter by mistake!)
Have you done any more work on the readability of journals etc?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Jacso <jacso at HAWAII.EDU>
To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU <SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU>
Date: 31 March 2003 20:27
Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Structured abstracts


>thanks Jim, e-mail attachment is fine.
>thnaks
>peter
>
>On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, J. Hartley wrote:
>
>> I can send it snail mail - printed offprint - or via e-mail attachment.
Let
>> me know which you prefer!
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Jacso <jacso at HAWAII.EDU>
>> To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU <SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU>
>> Date: 31 March 2003 11:42
>> Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Structured abstracts
>>
>>
>> >Sir, I am interested in that article. Could you please send it? if snail
>> >mail is needed this is my postal address
>> >322 Aoloa Street 709
>> >Kailua, HI 96734
>> >thanks
>> >peter jacso
>> >http://www2.hawaii.edu/~jacso
>> >
>> >On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, J. Hartley wrote:
>> >
>> >> Colleagues might like to know that my latest paper on structured
>> abstracts
>> >> has now been published (Science Communication, 24, 3, 366-379).  This
one
>> >> compares 24 traditional abstracts with 24 structured ones based on
>> abstracts
>> >> from the Journal of Educational Psychology and shows several benefits
for
>> >> the latter.  Copies of the paper are available from me:
>> >> j.hartley at psy.keele.ac.uk
>> >>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SciCompap.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 93184 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20030401/3cb42493/attachment.doc>