ABS: Wormell, Bibliomeetric Analysis of the Welfare State as a Research Phenomenon, Parts 1 and 2

Björn Tell bjorn.tell at LUB.LU.SE
Fri Sep 29 09:47:54 EDT 2000


>From: Wormell Irene <IW at db.dk>
>
>I. Wormell, "Bibliometric Analysis of the Welfare State as a Research
>Phenomenon". Scientometrics, 47(2000)2, pp.203-236 .
>
>The article is reporting the results  of the first part of an  extensive
>informetric analysis of the Welfare topic, carried out in 1998-99. The aim
>was to analyse  the structure of the  literature of international Welfare
>research, to provide a detailed picture of its basic theoretical and
>empirical concepts and the mutual relations existing between these concepts.
>
>The approach is novel in that  through the application of quantitative (i.e.
>bibliometric) techniques it tries to reduce subjectivity in  domain analysis
>and in the mapping of the developments and segmentation  in special topical
>areas.
>The analysis used the technique of co-ordinated online searches in a cluster
>of international bibliographic databases in DIALOG. The relevant theoretical
>and empirical concepts  have been structured in 13 sub-topics which have
>been in detail analysed, in three time intervals.
>
>Welfare State
>Social indicators
>Retrenchment
>Patriarchal State
>Altruism (solidarity)
>Marginalization
>Social insurance, safety net
>Unemployment benefit
>Keynesian economics
>Public economy
>Communitarism, pluralism, corporatism
>Public service delivery (health, education, children, elderly people)
>Public choice (privatization, licitation, evaluation, innovation in public
>services)
>
>By measuring trends and developments in the number of publications, term
>occurrences, similarity between the subject terms and formation of clusters
>among  the subject segments, the analysis provides a comprehensive review of
>such a  complex research field as the Welfare State is. The study, which
>primary aim is to  improve  the  methodology of quantitative analysis in the
>so called "soft" sciences,  will increase the interest among social
>scientists, scholars of the humanities  and library and information science
>to use databases as analytical tools  and to apply the modern text mining
>techniques for the extraction of knowledge from bibliographic data.
>
>
>
>I. Wormell, "Critical Aspects of the Danish Welfare State -As Revealed by
>Issue Tracking". Scientometrics, 47(20002, pp.237-250.
>
>This article constitutes the second part of the project entitled
>"Informetric Analysis of the Welfare Topic".
>The study applied and developed the methodology of issue tracking for
>"informetric studies" in the area of social sciences where metric techniques
>have been little used so far. Issue tracking and monitoring of literature
>are known methodologies in the area of science and technology, but due to
>the differences in the scientific communication, quantitative analysis in
>the "soft" sciences requires other techniques and research attitudes.  It
>was aimed to explore these differences and improve the existing
>methodologies by applying them to another type of scientific communication -
>where the topics and their subject representations are often ambiguous,
>therefore, the accurate identification, selection and harmonisation of
>search terms are cornerstones of the analysis.
>
>The project aims to introduce  and test the possibilities and limits of
>quantitative methods to unearth important past, current and future
>conditions related to the development of the Welfare concept in Denmark.
>This article is focusing on the methodology and does not attempt to provide
>explanations and interpretations of the topics  analysed. In the project
>there have been involved information scientists and a panel of domain
>experts and other specialists. However, the dialogues and consultations with
>the expert panel ensure the inclusion of certain qualitative elements into
>the study.
>
>Using the issue tracking methodology the 13 selected topics (see above) were
>analysed in periods accross various types of the Danish national databases
>covering information about the research, implementation, press and
>legislation aspects.
>This is a useful methodology for following how a concept (originating from
>an innovation or a new idea) is moving through the path of various
>publication forms e.g.,
>
>Theoretical research    applied research        techniques and engineering
>        popular press and mass media    legislation
>
>To provide a realistic and structured form for the study, the expert panel
>suggested to use the following three main points on the present criticism of
>the "Welfare State":
>
>                        Economic aspects,  Can we afford it?
>                        Legitimacy,  Does the people believe in it and how
>much do they support it?
>                        Functionality,  How does it work?
>
>Thus, the paper trace the pattern of debate about the three main critical
>issues of the modern Welfare State in Denmark: economic aspects, legitimacy
>and functionality. The approach taken is novel in that it implements and
>tests issue tracking in this area of social sciences, and  tries to reduce
>subjectivity in the analysis of trends influencing social policy and public
>opinion. The study aims to show how the emerging data and text mining
>techniques can be applied to integrate downloaded bibliographic data with
>other types of information in a strategic mix.
>
>In co-operation with the Institute for Future Studies, Denmark/Sweden, we
>are planning to continue the analyses  of  the information flow between
>research , media and the political system in order  to show the gaps between
>the politicians´ and the population´s  opinion about the Welfare State in
>Denmark. This will be an extensive project where the informetric analyses,
>along with  several other methods, will be used  for mapping the differences
>in the opinion of the Danish people  and the state.
>
>The final report is published in three volumes:
>
>Irene Wormell, Informetric Analysis of the Welfare State as a Research
>Phenomenon.Centre for Informetric Studies, Copenhagen, 1999.
>(CIS Report 8).Vol. I. General description and the results of the project.
>77 p.
>Vol. II. Methodology.  28 p.
>Vol III. Resumé. 28 p.
>
>Contact:
>Centre for Informetric Studies,
>Royal School of Library and Information Science,  Birketinget 6, DK-2300
>Copenhagen, Denmark.
>
>Tel: +45 32 58 60 66;  Fax:: +45 32 84 02 01
>http://www.db.dk/cis
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Gretchen,
As I am not at home, I have not access to Gene's e-mail address, so,
please, convey my best greetings to him from his very old friend, Bjorn
Tell, and tell him to still be active as I try to be, going to
the University of León in Nicaragua next month to teach about Internet
resources, such as ISI.
Best wishes
Bjorn Tell



More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list