[Sigmet-officers] Is there a problem with the sigmet-officers list
Jonathan Levitt
jonathan at levitt.net
Sat Feb 12 14:29:29 EST 2011
The decision is a matter of judgement and I think you have a good feel for Web-site design. I suggest that unless someone on this list comes up with any clear-cut preferences, when you have the time you produce the site that you think is appropriate.
I agree with Judit that the layout is excellent.
Jonathan.
--- On Wed, 9/2/11, Angela Zoss <amzoss at indiana.edu> wrote:
From: Angela Zoss <amzoss at indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Is there a problem with the sigmet-officers list
To: sigmet-officers at asis.org
Date: Wednesday, 9 February, 2011, 18:51
Yes, I was wondering about the home page myself. One possibility is that the home page is also the about page. Alternatively, we could have them separate, and the home page could have some other content. I'm wary about duplicating news items, if we also have a news box, but the home page could have a welcome or a shorter introduction statement. Thoughts?
-Angela
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net> wrote:
Hi,
Over the last few days I have sent three messages to the sigmet-officers list, but did not receive copies indicating that the list had accepted them. However I received the Failure Notice message pasted below. Is there a problem with the list?
I would be grateful for clarification.
Jonathan.
--- On Fri, 4/2/11, MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com <MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com> wrote:
From: MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com <MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com>
Subject: Failure Notice
To: jonathan at levitt.net
Date: Friday, 4 February, 2011, 17:10
Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
<sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>:
Message expired for domain mail.asis.org
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Received: from [98.139.91.65] by nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.36] by tm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 176068.64227.bm at omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 310 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2011 17:09:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1296666582; bh=c1CMxEz9rJk2hfKpwGV3MSKaMAQW9auac0RfSqMUIk4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WZHJGG/CCLEfcG7dmexodBf2AfOxOJD5r/2/xJ+L1Z+9ZxpXmJfOCLPbVock0ZFQblQcGQdcm2KUO5KaVPVGXc5Taoh9ihJafyEdrLucXvoqLUcYuUlBOLT+gb1yQI96hSbZ6Ifkka3RTqrYKvz9wcZGp6IqcK7a9sQCEFtfCgs=
Message-ID: <556934.98743.qm at web1202.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: NafZ6WQVM1nIyxauNrnAVdMNUz5J3ykNMpH1e5op_SH0Ahi
xoBdXP1doJ07ed0jL5XezvkkVkG60E9b64KkXcnQdbiZ3tL77V2T9MwJnvAH
q0laBENpU2b6dfqL4MryyllySQvPBJJvKRzLTu759VHEJeYjbXRn4BS.VyTE
xxbbN9LZcaK2DibeNlZtpM0bdnxHjZp9rOoZIRAvfLkBBtYjS3nO7My3mM5Q
nnUr5imhPx1mhU3fkNsZwqTea6TBS7FER5kJfyXQrbsxUXSBvN8w0M0jFRmO
fmmN2TD.W_NRl4YrsuYEknsniD68t_L1rU1nLxexYue6R4gVADbuBC19mqv7
glTOFOfbZ7DiXFqnok6dDHWHfHkM9Qw_M48xtyT1J6xAm6xCKqT2gwg--
Received: from [86.145.79.120] by web1202.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:09:42 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:09:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Planning the Web-site
To: sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=hWNF59TkCVbQWAwee0za3MAdysmx3OVSxmoUm at mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1314625945-1296666582=:98743"
--0-1314625945-1296666582=:98743
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear all,
=C2=A0
I have looked at the Google doc on Web-site and on most points we seem to h=
ave reached a strong consensus.
=C2=A0
To me there are only two points that need further clarification:
(a)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Officers: Four of the officers have=
provided an email address and affiliation; Stasa and Chaoqun have not prov=
ided an email address or affiliation, and Dietmar has provided only an emai=
l address in (which is in different format from that of the other officers)=
.=C2=A0 I suggest that the Web-site provides similar information on each of=
ficer.
(b)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Email list: Whilst we acknowledge the hos=
ting of the SIGMETRICS list, we do not acknowledge the moderator.=C2=A0 I s=
uggest that we also acknowledge Gretchen Whitney.=20
=C2=A0
Angela, could you please draft a prototype for the Web-site?
=C2=A0
Best regards,
Jonathan.
=C2=A0
_______________________________________________
Sigmet-officers mailing list
Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Sigmet-officers mailing list
Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110212/770d431d/attachment.html
More information about the Sigmet-officers
mailing list