[Sigmet-officers] Is there a problem with the sigmet-officers list

Sat Feb 5 13:16:42 EST 2011

HQ has had some power outages this last week and I know that we were also
spotty on other ASIS&T listservs.  However, I think all systems are up and
running again.

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>wrote:

> *Hi,*
>
> * *
>
> *Over the last few days I have sent three messages to the sigmet-officers
> list, but did not receive copies indicating that the list had accepted them.
> However I received the Failure Notice message pasted below.  Is there a
> problem with the list?*
>
> * *
>
> *I would be grateful for clarification.*
>
> *Jonathan.*
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 4/2/11, MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com <
> MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com <
> MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com>
> Subject: Failure Notice
> To: jonathan at levitt.net
> Date: Friday, 4 February, 2011, 17:10
>
> Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
>
> <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sigmet-officers@mail.asis.org>
> >:
> Message expired for domain mail.asis.org
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Received: from [98.139.91.65] by nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with
> NNFMP; 02 Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
> Received: from [98.139.91.36] by tm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
> 02 Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
> Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02
> Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
> X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 176068.64227.bm at omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=176068.64227.bm@omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com>
> Received: (qmail 310 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2011 17:09:42 -0000
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com;
> s=s1024; t=1296666582; bh=c1CMxEz9rJk2hfKpwGV3MSKaMAQW9auac0RfSqMUIk4=;
> h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
> b=WZHJGG/CCLEfcG7dmexodBf2AfOxOJD5r/2/xJ+L1Z+9ZxpXmJfOCLPbVock0ZFQblQcGQdcm2KUO5KaVPVGXc5Taoh9ihJafyEdrLucXvoqLUcYuUlBOLT+gb1yQI96hSbZ6Ifkka3RTqrYKvz9wcZGp6IqcK7a9sQCEFtfCgs=
> Message-ID: <556934.98743.qm at web1202.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=556934.98743.qm@web1202.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> >
> X-YMail-OSG: NafZ6WQVM1nIyxauNrnAVdMNUz5J3ykNMpH1e5op_SH0Ahi
> xoBdXP1doJ07ed0jL5XezvkkVkG60E9b64KkXcnQdbiZ3tL77V2T9MwJnvAH
> q0laBENpU2b6dfqL4MryyllySQvPBJJvKRzLTu759VHEJeYjbXRn4BS.VyTE
> xxbbN9LZcaK2DibeNlZtpM0bdnxHjZp9rOoZIRAvfLkBBtYjS3nO7My3mM5Q
> nnUr5imhPx1mhU3fkNsZwqTea6TBS7FER5kJfyXQrbsxUXSBvN8w0M0jFRmO
> fmmN2TD.W_NRl4YrsuYEknsniD68t_L1rU1nLxexYue6R4gVADbuBC19mqv7
> glTOFOfbZ7DiXFqnok6dDHWHfHkM9Qw_M48xtyT1J6xAm6xCKqT2gwg--
> Received: from [86.145.79.120] by web1202.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:09:42 PST
> X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:09:42 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jonathan@levitt.net>
> >
> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Planning the Web-site
> To: sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sigmet-officers@mail.asis.org>
> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=hWNF59TkCVbQWAwee0za3MAdysmx3OVSxmoUm at mail.gmail.com<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hWNF59TkCVbQWAwee0za3MAdysmx3OVSxmoUm@mail.gmail.com>
> >
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="0-1314625945-1296666582=:98743"
>
> --0-1314625945-1296666582=:98743
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Dear all,
> =C2=A0
> I have looked at the Google doc on Web-site and on most points we seem to
> h=
> ave reached a strong consensus.
> =C2=A0
> To me there are only two points that need further clarification:
> (a)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Officers: Four of the officers
> have=
> provided an email address and affiliation; Stasa and Chaoqun have not prov=
> ided an email address or affiliation, and Dietmar has provided only an
> emai=
> l address in (which is in different format from that of the other
> officers)=
> .=C2=A0 I suggest that the Web-site provides similar information on each
> of=
> ficer.
> (b)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Email list: Whilst we acknowledge the
> hos=
> ting of the SIGMETRICS list, we do not acknowledge the moderator.=C2=A0 I
> s=
> uggest that we also acknowledge Gretchen Whitney.=20
> =C2=A0
> Angela, could you please draft a prototype for the Web-site?
> =C2=A0
> Best regards,
> Jonathan.
> =C2=A0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigmet-officers mailing list
> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>
>

-- 
Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD
Assistant Professor
School of Library and Information Science
Indiana University Bloomington
http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto<http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/%7Esugimoto>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110205/251667c0/attachment.html 