[Sigia-l] Food for thought

[Luca Rosati]

Paola Kathuria ha scritto:

> 
> The problem is of implied functionality according to association by 
> proximity. You order a plate of food; you get a plate with more than
>  you asked for and consider it a bonus, so you eat it. Makes sense.
> 

Hi, Paola,
a fascinating case study!

I'm reading just these days the Maeda's book "The laws of simplicity"
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0262134721>, and your case seems a
good sample of Law 6:

*What lies in the periphery of simplicity is definitely not peripheral*
<http://lawsofsimplicity.com/?p=55>.

Cheers
Luca
--
Luca Rosati
http://lucarosati.it
http://trovabile.org