[Sigia-l] User experience taxonomy

[mark.reuten at didata.com.au]

David wrote:

>At first glance (it's late) there seems to be no hierarchical
>structure implied here.  That would help.

I guess my main problem is not having a hierarchy, every time I find
something new which does not fit into an existing directory I create a new
one...I knew this was a dead end solution, call it lazy ;-). Some of the
directories have subdirectories but mainly I there is a lot of breath not
depth.

>Another tip: building a model with Windows icons that represent folders
within folders is much easier to read than a model crafted from, e.g. those
>representations of bookmarks and favourites. My two cents.

I agree that the folder representation is easier to read but what it lacks
is the ability to show me related documents or categories.

The other thing I want to be able to do is rate my items, I have been
adding X's (X=ok to XXXXX=damn good) to filenames as an indication of
general usefulness (to me that is..) but I really wish to rate their
usefulness in relation to one ore more subjects.

Greetings,

Mark





******************************************************************************
- NOTICE -
This message is confidential, and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information.  If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it immediately.

Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message and any attachments for viruses.  Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments.
******************************************************************************