[Asis-standards] ISO reaffirmation votes

margie_hlava mhlava at accessinn.com
Thu Jan 26 18:51:35 EST 2017


Must be the season for these.  I'm good with reaffirmation of all of them. 

Marjorie Hlava
Mhlava at accessinn.com
Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 26, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Mark Needleman <needleman_mark at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>   Folks
> 
>   There are a bunch of reaffirmation votes coming up that require voting on by
>   2/28/2017 - Im listing them below
> 
>   By default I’m not including copies of the standards in this note but if
>   anyone wants a copy of any of any of them just let me know and ill forward
>   it along
> 
>   Mark
> 
> 1) Systematic Review of ISO 233:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration
> of Arabic characters into Latin characters
> 
>   Do you recommend ISO 233:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration of
>   Arabic characters into Latin characters be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn?
> 
> 2) Systematic Review of ISO 233-2:1993 (vers 5) Information and documentation
> -- Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters -- Part 2: Arabic
> language -- Simplified transliteration
> 
>   Do  you  recommend  ISO  233-2:1993 (vers 5) be confirmed, revised, or
>   withdrawn?
> 
> 3)  Systematic Review of ISO 15919:2001 (vers 3) -- Information and
> documentation -- Transliteration of Devanagari and related Indic scripts into
> Latin characters
> 
>   Do  you  recommend  ISO  15919:2001 (vers 3) be confirmed, revised, or
>   withdrawn?
> 
> 4) Systematic Review of ISO 9:1995 (Ed 2, vers 3) Information and documentation
> -- Transliteration of Cyrillic characters into Latin characters -- Slavic and
> non-Slavic languages
> 
>   Do   you   recommend   ISO   9:1995  (Ed  2,  vers  3)  Information  &
>   documentation--Transliteration   of  Cyrillic  characters  into  Latin
>   characters--Slavic  &  non-Slavic  languages be confirmed, revised, or
>   withdrawn?
> 
> 5) Systematic Review of ISO 9985:1996 (vers 3) Information and documentation --
> Transliteration of Armenian characters into Latin characters
> 
>   Do you recommend ISO 9985:1996 (vers 3) Information and documentation --
>   Transliteration of Armenian characters into Latin characters be confirmed,
>   revised, or withdrawn?
> 
> 6) Systematic Review of ISO 259:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration
> of Hebrew characters into Latin characters
> 
>   Do you recommend ISO 259:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration of
>   Hebrew characters into Latin characters be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn?
> 
> 7) Systematic Review of ISO 259-2:1994 (vers 3) Information and documentation
> -- Transliteration of Hebrew characters into Latin characters -- Part 2:
> Simplified transliteration
> 
>   Do you recommend ISO 259-2:1994 (vers 3) Information and documentation --
>   Transliteration  of Hebrew characters into Latin characters -- Part 2:
>   Simplified translit be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn?
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards




More information about the Asis-standards mailing list