[Asis-standards] New votes

[Gail Hodge]

Makes sense to me. -- Gail

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Thornburg,Gail <thornbug at oclc.org> wrote:

> 2) Cyrillic.   From what I understand of this standard,  if you're using
> Unicode you're not using 10754.   However, investigation of the characters
> that were not able to be mapped is still needed,   so I should  think we
> would not want to vote against anyway ,  that is , not vote to withdraw.
> Does that make sense?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf
> Of Mark Needleman
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:27 AM
> To: 'asis-standards at asis.org'
> Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes
>
> Folks
>
> a few more ISO votes coming up (sorry for the short notice)
>
>
> 1)  Systematic Review of ISO 22310:2006, Information and documentation --
> Guidelines for standards drafters for stating records management ISO
> 22310:2006 allows the appropriate incorporation of records requirements,
> according to ISO 15489-1, ISO/TR 15489-2 and 23081-1, which are applicable
> to all standards that require the creation and retention of records into
> other standards. It also highlights the different elements that need to be
> considered as components of a comprehensive records management framework.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
> If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
> this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> Your voting options are:
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from
> voting) [comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31
>
> 2)  Systematic Review of ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation --
> Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic
> languages for bibliographic information interchange This is a ballot for
> the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 10754:1996,
> Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded
> character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information
> interchange.
>
> This standard specifies a set of 90 graphic characters containing
> characters from the non-Slavic Cyrillic alphabets. Consists of a code table
> and a legend with explanatory notes containing each graphic, its use and
> its name. The character set is primarily intended for the interchange of
> information among data processing systems and within message transmission
> systems.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
> If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
> this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> Your voting options are:
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from
> voting) [comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31
>
> 3)  Systematic Review of ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation --
> Registry services for libraries and related organizations This is a ballot
> for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2146:2010,
> Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and
> related organizations.
>
> ISO 2146:2010 establishes the rules for registries operating in a network
> environment to provide the information about collections, parties,
> activities and services needed by libraries and related organizations to
> manage their collections and deliver information and documentation services
> across a range of applications and domains. It presents a data element
> directory that may be used as a framework for collecting the appropriate
> data and sharing it with other registry services, providing access to
> registry data through standard protocols whenever it is needed as part of
> an automated business workflow, publishing registries in electronic or
> print form and archiving registry data when the data exists only in
> electronic form.
>
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
> If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
> this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> Your voting options are:
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from
> voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed
> by May 31
>
> Ive attached the relevant documents to this note
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>



-- 


 Gail Hodge

 Information International Associates, Inc.
 Email: ghodge at iiaweb.com
 Phone: 865-742-5430
 visit us at www.iiaweb.com



**An ISO 9001:2008 and 20000:2011 Quality Certified Company**