[Asis-standards] New votes

[Mark H Needleman]

I think I understand - thanks

mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of
Thornburg,Gail
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:00 AM
To: Mark Needleman; 'asis-standards at asis.org'
Subject: Re: [Asis-standards] New votes

2) Cyrillic.   From what I understand of this standard,  if you're using
Unicode you're not using 10754.   However, investigation of the characters
that were not able to be mapped is still needed,   so I should  think we
would not want to vote against anyway ,  that is , not vote to withdraw.
Does that make sense?


-----Original Message-----
From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of
Mark Needleman
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:27 AM
To: 'asis-standards at asis.org'
Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes

Folks

a few more ISO votes coming up (sorry for the short notice)


1)  Systematic Review of ISO 22310:2006, Information and documentation --
Guidelines for standards drafters for stating records management ISO
22310:2006 allows the appropriate incorporation of records requirements,
according to ISO 15489-1, ISO/TR 15489-2 and 23081-1, which are applicable
to all standards that require the creation and retention of records into
other standards. It also highlights the different elements that need to be
considered as components of a comprehensive records management framework.

***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.

Your voting options are:
Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from
voting) [comments optional]

Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31

2)  Systematic Review of ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation --
Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic
languages for bibliographic information interchange This is a ballot for the
five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 10754:1996,
Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded
character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information
interchange.

This standard specifies a set of 90 graphic characters containing characters
from the non-Slavic Cyrillic alphabets. Consists of a code table and a
legend with explanatory notes containing each graphic, its use and its name.
The character set is primarily intended for the interchange of information
among data processing systems and within message transmission systems.

***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.

Your voting options are:
Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from
voting) [comments optional]

Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31

3)  Systematic Review of ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation --
Registry services for libraries and related organizations This is a ballot
for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2146:2010,
Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related
organizations.

ISO 2146:2010 establishes the rules for registries operating in a network
environment to provide the information about collections, parties,
activities and services needed by libraries and related organizations to
manage their collections and deliver information and documentation services
across a range of applications and domains. It presents a data element
directory that may be used as a framework for collecting the appropriate
data and sharing it with other registry services, providing access to
registry data through standard protocols whenever it is needed as part of an
automated business workflow, publishing registries in electronic or print
form and archiving registry data when the data exists only in electronic
form.


***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.

Your voting options are:
Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from
voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed
by May 31

Ive attached the relevant documents to this note

Mark






_______________________________________________
Asis-standards mailing list
Asis-standards at asis.org
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards