[Sigia-l] Identification please
Skot Nelson
skot at penguinstorm.com
Thu May 10 15:14:06 EDT 2007
Jonathan Baker-Bates wrote:
> They then tested that against conventional tree
> and list browsing interfaces and found that users could retrieve
> information faster with these than even proficient users of the
> hyperbolic UI.
>
> Do you know of such research?
I googled "tree beats hyperbolic browser" and found a bit.
The Effect of Information Scent on Searching Information Visualizations
of Large Tree Structures
Peter Pirolli, Stuart K. Card, and Mija M. Van Der Wege
> Hypothesis –
> Hyperbolic browsers will outperform more conventional, Explorer-like browsers in search tasks
> Method – four types of tasks
> (1) Simple retrieval
> (2) Complex retrieval
> (3) Local relational
> (4) Complex/global relational
> Results –
> No significant difference in overall task times between Hyperbolic and Explorer browsers. Indications that individual performances can overwhelm browser design for overall task.
> Hyperbolic browser seems to be faster than Explorer at high scent and slower at low scent (see Figure 4). No reliable statistical difference between low and high scent comparisons for Explorer.
Of course, I probably could have found more results if the list had been
presented in a Hyperbolic Browser :D
--
Skot Nelson
skot (at) penguinstorm (dot) com
Music is my saviour / I was maimed by rock and roll
I was tamed by rock and roll / I got my name from rock and roll
- Jeff Tweedy
More information about the Sigia-l
mailing list