[Sigia-l] Human-Centered Design 99% bad
Ted Han
notheory at gmail.com
Mon Aug 1 11:39:27 EDT 2005
On 8/1/05, Stewart Dean <stew8dean at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Secondly the reson to focus on activity is to average out user behavour to
> avoid over specialisation. You can find out a lot about usage from 10 people
> but for hard core streamlined functional support I feel requires many more
> users using it in situ - that is refinement through use. This goes beyond
> the individual needs but is how people use something.
But... but, this isn't actually... a change, is it? What you've just
described is understanding what conclusions can be drawn from
behavio(u)ral data. Is this a problem with "human centered design"?
And if it is, does fixing this problem (whether it's learning
statistics, or a "focus on activity") really constitute a change
substantial enough to qualify for new terminology?
-T
More information about the Sigia-l
mailing list