[Asis-standards] 5127

[Mark Needleman]

Thanks for the input

mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Thornburg,Gail
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 9:06 AM
To: Baden Hughes; Mark Needleman
Cc: ASIST Standards Committee
Subject: Re: [Asis-standards] 5127

I have no objection to this

-----Original Message-----
From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Baden Hughes
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 6:53 PM
To: Mark Needleman
Cc: ASIST Standards Committee
Subject: Re: [Asis-standards] 5127

NISO's logic is sensible enough.

>From our perspective, if we felt strongly enough about our comments, this would be a way to force ISO to at least consider them. With the weight of NISO behind us, that's not a bad position to end up in, regardless of how likely it would be that we changed our opinion as a result.


Baden


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu> wrote:

> Folks
>
> Since we sent in comments on our yes vote on ISO 5127 NISO has 
> requested that all organizations that voted yes with comments change 
> their vote to no so NISO can send in  a no vote to ISO which means 
> they would have to respond to those comments which they don't with a yes vote.
>
> Thoughts on this?
>
> Mark
>
> Sent from Mark Needleman's  iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>

_______________________________________________
Asis-standards mailing list
Asis-standards at asis.org
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards