[Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?

Simone Alencar salencar at gmail.com
Sat Oct 17 09:24:27 EDT 2015


Thanks by the explanation. I agree with you.

Best,
Simone

Maria Simone de Menezes Alencar
Professora Adjunta
Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais - CCH
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UNIRIO
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1933365741854449



2015-10-17 10:00 GMT-03:00 David Wojick <dwojick at craigellachie.us>:

> I think the boss is always in last place and the primary researcher or
> researchers come first. My point was that the method that includes all
> authors will include the mentors, such as the thesis adviser or project
> director. However, only including the first author will undercount those
> cases where several people did the research.
>
> David
>
> On Oct 17, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Simone Alencar <salencar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I read in someplace about the assumption of the first author could be a
> mentor depends which knowledge area is studied. In some areas, like
> biomedicine and genomics, is usual put the "boss" in last place.
> is it right?
>
> Em sábado, 17 de outubro de 2015, David Wojick <
> <dwojick at craigellachie.us>dwojick at craigellachie.us> escreveu:
>
>> Both methods have their merits. The difference may be a measure of
>> collaboration or mentoring. The first author method may tell us more about
>> who is doing research.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 4:55 AM, Yuling Tan <tanyuling2007 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It should regards the primary affiliation country of the first author.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Bosman, J.M. (Jeroen) <j.bosman at uu.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Papers with authors from both countries will be counted for both columns.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Jeroen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 101 innovations: tools database <http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list> |
>>> survey <https://101innovations.wordpress.com/>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> *------------------------------*
>>>
>>> Jeroen Bosman, faculty liaison for the Faculty of Geosciences
>>>
>>> Utrecht University Library <http://www.uu.nl/library>
>>>
>>> email: j.bosman at uu.nl
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> *Trees say printing is a thing of the past*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* SIGMETRICS [mailto:sigmetrics-bounces at asis.org] *On Behalf Of *Pamela
>>> Sieving
>>> *Sent:* donderdag 15 oktober 2015 19:44
>>> *To:* Yuling Tan
>>> *Cc:* SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Sigmetrics] Chinese versus US article output?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how the determination was made to include articles in
>>> one column or the other?  What happens with articles by authors in both
>>> China and the US?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pam Sieving
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Yuling Tan <tanyuling2007 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> yes, this is a still growing trend!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Pikas, Christina K. <
>>> Christina.Pikas at jhuapl.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don’t know if anyone has mentioned it, but there has been a concerted
>>> effort to add more Chinese content to both WoS and Scopus in the past few
>>> years. Perhaps using CNKI for China would be better?  But then what would
>>> you use for the US?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIGMETRICS mailing list
>>> SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
>>> <http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics>
>>> <http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics>
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIGMETRICS mailing list
>> SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
>> <http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics>
>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics
>>
>>
>
> --
> Maria Simone de Menezes Alencar
> Professora Adjunta
> Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais - CCH
> Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UNIRIO
> <http://lattes.cnpq.br/1933365741854449>
> http://lattes.cnpq.br/1933365741854449
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIGMETRICS mailing list
> SIGMETRICS at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmetrics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20151017/31516c2b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list