From vincent.lariviere at UMONTREAL.CA Mon Sep 1 10:07:26 2014 From: vincent.lariviere at UMONTREAL.CA (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Larivi=E8re_Vincent?=) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:07:26 +0000 Subject: ASIS&T SIG/MET Workshop (Seattle) - Call for Abstracts -- extended deadline Message-ID: Second call for papers - extended deadline METRICS 2014 - ASIS&T WORKSHOP ON INFORMETRIC AND SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH CALL FOR ABSTRACTS The ASIS&T Special Interest Group for Metrics (SIG/MET) will host a workshop on Wednesday, November 5th 2014 (9am - 5pm), at the end of the ASIS&T Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington. This workshop will provide an opportunity for presentations and in-depth conversations on metric-related issues, including the latest theories, approaches, applications, innovations, and tools. The workshop is envisioned as a combination of short presentations and open discussion. Research on metrics has been growing significantly over the last decades. In addition to account for a significant proportion of the literature published in core LIS journals, there is also a large proportion of metrics literature published in general science journal as well as in medical journals. Recent workshops on the topics have been largely successful. For instance, on November 2nd 2013, SIG/MET held its third annual Workshop on Informetric and Scientometric Research, during the ASIS&T Annual Meeting in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The full day event, sponsored by both Elsevier and Thomson Reuters, attracted 30 participants. The symposium consisted of two poster presentations and thirteen paper presentations by authors from nine countries (Canada, Finland, Germany, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States). As in previous years, the SIG recognized outstanding student contributions, with one session devoted to presenting these awards and presentations by the recipients. The 2014 workshop would continue in this vein and consolidate the work done in previous iterations of the workshop. We propose to include presentations from both established researchers and students, all done in an informal setting where genuine exchanges can be made. The topics covered would include the following but are not limited to: - New indicators and methods - Applications of indicators - Theories of the publication process and citations - Metrics in a library setting - Open access and metrics - Tool development - Limitations, misuses and adverse effects of metrics - Measurements and implications of interdisciplinarity - Visualizations of scholarly impact measures and analyses SIG/MET is the Special Interest Group for the measurement of information production and use. It encourages the development and networking of all those interested in the measurement of information. It encompasses not only bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics and informetrics, but also measurement of the Web and the Internet, applications running on these platforms, and metrics related to network analysis, visualization, and scholarly communication. Submissions Submissions should be in the form of a two-page structured abstract. Conceptual, empirical, and works-in-progress will be accepted for submission. Where appropriate, up to three figures/tables can be provided. Two types of submissions will be accepted: posters and presentations. Please indicate the type of submission in bold at the beginning of your submission. The requirements for both formats are the same. Submit in .pdf, .doc or .docx to : https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=sigmet2014 Peer-Review process Each submission will be reviewed and brief feedback will be given in narrative format. Important Dates Submissions due: August 31, September 7, 2014 Notifications: September 15, 2014 Workshop: November 5, 2014 Registration fees The registration fee is $200 for ASIST members and will include wifi and two break meals. First 15 students who register will receive $100 back from their registration, courtesy of Elsevier. With questions, please contact Vincent Larivi?re Chair, SIG/MET vincent.lariviere at umontreal.ca ________________________ Vincent Larivi?re, Ph.D. Chaire de recherche du Canada sur les transformations de la communication savante ?cole de biblioth?conomie et des sciences de l'information (EBSI) Universit? de Montr?al Directeur scientifique adjoint Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) Universit? du Qu?bec ? Montr?al T?l: +1.514.343.5600 Fax: +1.514.343.5753 http://crc.ebsi.umontreal.ca vincent.lariviere at umontreal.ca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From katy at INDIANA.EDU Tue Sep 2 09:00:06 2014 From: katy at INDIANA.EDU (Katy Borner) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:00:06 -0400 Subject: STI conference Leiden--Quality standards for evaluation indicators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear all, I very much like to see that there will be a discussion about quality standards for evaluation indicators at STI. The development of validated data analysis and visualization workflows/tools and the generation of replicable results is at the core of any scientific effort that aims to convert data into actionable insights. Good to see the background material provided (you might also like to review results from the below workshops) and hope results of the special session will be shared widely. Best regards, k *Recent Standards Workshops* OECD-experts dialogue on scientometrics: Improving the use of bibliometric indicators and analysis for policy-making . March 25, 2014 | OECD, Paris, France Science Mapping Standards Workshop November 04-05, 2013 | Bloomington, Indiana Standards for Science Mapping and Classifications July 15, 2013 | ISSI, Vienna, Austria JSMF Workshop on Standards for Science Metrics, Classifications, and Mapping August 11-12, 2011 | Bloomington, IN On 8/28/2014 4:12 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > Dear Loet and Lutz, > > Many thanks for this contribution. The motivation for the discussion > about standards, as far as I am concerned, is the need to protect > research groups and researchers against sloppy or damaging evaluation > practices. I agree with Loet that standards are often a powerful > competition weapon to protect industry interests. It is certainly not > the motivation for this panel, but it may end up like that if the > process of standard setting, and the sociological interpretation of > those standards, is not taken into account carefully. In my view the > STI conference is the best place to have this discussion, because it > is a meeting place between metrics experts and policy experts. In my > view, this does not lead to the question whether or not one should > have some quality control process of evaluation processes, but what > kind of quality control we need and what kind of standards with > respect to data and indicators can play a role in this. > > In other words, you have raised a crucial point for the panel > discussion next week. > > Regards, > > > Paul Wouters > Professor of Scientometrics > Director Centre for Science and Technology Studies > Leiden University > > PS: I am pleased to announce the release of our completely renewed > CWTS website: > cwts.nl - all information now easily available! > > Visiting address: > Willem Einthoven Building > Wassenaarseweg 62A > 2333 AL Leiden > Mail address: P.O. Box 905 > 2300 AX Leiden > T: +31 71 5273909 (secr.) > F: +31 71 5273911 > E: p.f.wouters at cwts.leidenuniv.nl > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > ] *On Behalf Of *Ismael Rafols > *Sent:* Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:21 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] STI conference Leiden--Quality standards > for evaluation indicators > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > With apologies for cross-posting) > > Dear all, > to warm up forweek in the ST Indicators Conference in Leiden, let > us share the topic of a debate: > > *Quality standards for evaluation indicators: Any chance for the > dream to come true?* > > /Special session at the STI-ENID conference in Leiden, 3 September > 2014, 16-17.30h / > > /Organisers/: Ismael Rafols (INGENIO & SPRU), Paul Wouters (CWTS, > Leiden University), Sarah de Rijcke (CWTS, Leiden University) > > /Location/: Aalmarkt-hall, Stadsgehoorzaal Leiden > > There is a growing realization in the scientometrics community of > the need to offer clearer guidance to users and further develop > standards for professional use of bibliometrics in research > evaluations. Indeed the STI-ENID Conference 2014 has the telling > sub-title ?Context Matters?. This session continues from the 2013 > ISSI and STI conferences in Vienna and Berlin, where full plenary > sessions were convened on the need for standards in evaluative > bibliometrics, and the ethical and policy implications of > individual-level bibliometrics. The need to debate these issues > has come to the forefront in light of reports that uses of certain > easy-to-use metrics for evaluative purposes have become a routine > part of academic life, despite misgivings within the profession > itself about its validity. Very recently high-profile movements > against certain metric indicators (e.g. the DORA declaration about > the Journal Impact Factor) have brought possible misuses of > metrics further to the center of attention. There may be a growing > need for standards ? also to promote for accountability of > scientometricians as experts. > > Indeed the relationship between scientometricians and end-users > has been changing over the years due to factors like: 1. > Increasing demands for bibliometric services in research > management at various levels of aggregation, 2. New capacities and > demands for performance information through the greater > availability of new research technologies and their applications, > and 3. The emergence of ?citizen bibliometrics? (i.e. > bibliometrics carried out by non-expert end-users) due to larger > availability of data and indicators. Some of these developments > may result in new opportunities for research contributions and > information-use, and may increase effectiveness of bibliometrics > due to more advanced indicators and increased availability of data > sets (including web data). Yet some innovations also risk > bypassing the quality control mechanisms of fields like > scientometrics and the standards they promote. The implications of > this increasing scope and intensity of bibliometric practices > requires a concerted response from scientometrics to produce more > explicit guidelines and expert advice on good scientometric > practices for specific evaluative practices such as recruitment, > grant awards, institutional or national benchmarking. > > This special session will bring together scientometric experts, > representatives of funding agencies, policy makers and opinion > leaders on the role of metrics in research assessment to discuss > the extent to which moving towards clearer, standardised > guidelines over usage and consultancy can be achieved, both > technically and strategically, and what the guidelines should look > like concretely. > > --- > > /Background material/: > > - Report on International workshop "Guidelines and good practices > on quantitative assessments of research" (OST, Paris, 12 May > 2014): > http://www.obs-ost.fr/fractivit%C3%A9s/workshop_international > > > - Blogposts Paul Wouters on previous debates at the ISSI and STI > conferences in 2013, and on the DORA declaration: > > http://citationculture.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/bibliometrics-of-individual-researchers/ > > > http://citationculture.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/bibliometrics-of-individual-researchers-the-debate-in-berlin/ > > > http://citationculture.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/dora-a-stimulus-for-a-new-evaluation-culture-in-science/ > > > - Information on the Higher Education Funding Council for England > (HEFCE) "Independent review of the role of metrics in research > assessment" + SPRU response > > http://citationculture.wordpress.com/2014/05/02/metrics-in-research-assessment-under-review/ > > > http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/howfundr/metrics/ > > > https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=spru-response-final.pdf&site=25 > > > - Opinion article for JASIST by Sarah de Rijcke and Alex Rushforth > "To intervene, or not to intervene; is that the question? On the > role of scientometrics in research evaluation." > > https://citationculture.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/de-rijcke_rushforth_jasist_preprint2014.pdf > > > -- Katy Borner Victor H. Yngve Professor of Information Science Director, CI for Network Science Center, http://cns.iu.edu Curator, Mapping Science exhibit, http://scimaps.org ILS, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Wells Library 021, 1320 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA Phone: (812) 855-3256 Fax: -6166 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Tue Sep 2 12:19:41 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:19:41 -0400 Subject: The Open Access Interviews: Paul Royster, Coordinator of Scholarly Communications, University of Nebraska-Lincoln In-Reply-To: Message-ID: *What OA Needs Is More Action, Not More Definition* For the record: I renounce (and have long renounced) the original 2002 BOAI (and BBB) definition of Open Access (OA) (even though I was one of the original co-drafters and co-signers of BOAI) in favour of its 2008 revision *(sic)* as Gratis OA (free online access) and Libre OA (free online access plus certain re-use rights, e.g., CC-BY). The original BOAI definition was improvised. Over a decade of subsequent evidence, experience and reflection have now made it clear that this first approximation in 2002 was needlessly over-reaching and (insofar as Green OA self-archiving was concerned) incoherent (except if we were prepared to declare almost all Green OA ? which was and still is by far the largest and most reachable body of OA ? as not being OA!). The original BOAI/BBB definition has since also become an obstacle to the growth of (Green, Gratis) OA as well as a point of counterproductive schism and formalism in the OA movement that have not been to the benefit of OA (but to the benefit of the opponents of OA, or to the publishers that want to ensure -- via Green OA embargoes -- that the only path to OA should be one that preserves their current revenue streams: Fool's Gold OA ). I would like to agree with Richard Poynder that OA needs some sort of "authoritative" organization -- but of whom should that authoritative organization consist? My inclination is that it should be the providers and users of the OA research itself, namely peer-reviewed journal article authors, their institutions and their funders. Their ?definition? of OA would certainly be authoritative. Let me close by emphasizing that I too see Libre OA as desirable and inevitable. But my belief (and it has plenty of supporting evidence) is that the only way to get to Libre OA is for all institutions and funders to mandate (and provide) Gratis Green OA first ? not to quibble or squabble about the BOAI/BBB ?definition? of OA, or their favorite flavours of Libre OA licenses. My only difference with Paul Royster is that the primary target for OA is peer-reviewed journal articles, and for that it is not just repositories that are needed, but Green OA mandates from authors? institutions and funders. *P.S. *To forestall yet another round of definitional wrangling: Even an effective Gratis Green OA mandate requires some compromises, namely, if authors elect to comply with a publisher embargo on Green OA, they need merely deposit the final, refereed, revised draft in their institutional repository immediately upon acceptance for publication -- and set the access as "restricted access" instead of OA during the (allowable) embargo. The repository's automated email copy-request Button will allow any user to request and any author to provide a single copy for research purposes during the embargo with one click each. (We call this compromise "Almost-OA." It is a workaround for the 40% of journals that embargo Gratis Green OA; and this too is a necessary first step on the road to 100% immediate Green Gratis OA and onward. I hope no one will now call for a formal definition of "Almost-OA" before we can take action on mandating OA...) On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > On Sep 1, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Stephen Downes wrote: > > Some really important discussion here. In particular, I would argue (with > this article) that the insistence on CC-by (which allows commercial reuse) > comes not from actual proponents of open access, but by commercial > publishers promoting their own interests. http://www.downes.ca/post/62708 > > > Actually, it?s much more complicated than that. Journal publishers (both > commercial and learned-society) have conflicts of interest with Green OA -- > both Gratis (free for all online) and Libre (free for all online *plus* > re-use rights, especially commercial re-use rights). > > And, on top of that, there are impatient researchers militating > uncompromisingly for Libre OA in certain fields that would especially > benefit from Libre OA re-use rights. > > And there are the Gold OA publishers that want to promote their product by > lionizing the benefits of Libre OA and deprecating Gratis OA, whether from > author self-archiving (Gratis Green) or rival Gold OA and hybrid > publishers (Gratis Gold). > > And often, alas, the library community, including SPARC, does not > understand either, and needlessly complicates things wtill further. > > Let me simplify: Libre OA (free for all online *plus* re-use rights) is > Gratis OA (free for all online) PLUS re-use rights. Libre OA asks for MORE > than Gratis OA. Hence Libre OA faces far more obstacles than Gratis OA. > > *Yet we are nowhere near having even Gratis OA yet:* Around 30% in most > fields, especially during the first 12 months of publication (mainly > because of publisher embargoes ? on Gratis OA ? but also because of > (groundless) author fears). > > *That?s why Gratis Green OA mandates are urgently needed from institutions > and funders, worldwide.* > > Once we have 100% Gratis Green OA globally, all the rest will come: > Fair-Gold OA and all the re-use rights researchers want and need. > > But as long as we keep fussing and focussing pre-emptively and > compulsively on Libre OA re-use rights (and Fool?s Gold OA) instead of > mandating Gratis Green, we will keep getting next to no OA at all, of > either kind, as now. > > And all it requires is a tiny bit of thought to see why this is so. (But > for some reason, many people prefer to fulminate instead, about the > relative virtues of Gratis vs Libre, Green vs Gold, and CC-BY vs > non-commercial CC-BY.) > > Let?s hope that the institutions and funding agencies will get their acts > together soon. At least 20 years of OA have already been needlessly lost? > > Dixit, > > Stevan Harnad > Exceedingly Weary Archivangelist > > > *From:* Repositories discussion list [ > mailto:JISC-REPOSITORIES at JISCMAIL.AC.UK > ] *On Behalf Of *Richard Poynder > *Sent:* September-01-14 8:20 AM > *To:* JISC-REPOSITORIES at JISCMAIL.AC.UK > *Subject:* The Open Access Interviews: Paul Royster, Coordinator of > Scholarly Communications, University of Nebraska-Lincoln > > Paul Royster is proud of what he has achieved with his institutional > repository. Currently, it contains 73,000 full-text items, of which more > than 60,000 are freely accessible to the world. This, says Royster, makes > it the second largest institutional repository in the US, and it receives > around > 500,000 downloads per month, with around 30% of those going to > international users. > > Unsurprisingly, Royster always assumed that he was in the vanguard of the > OA movement, and that fellow OA advocates attached considerable value to > the work he was doing. > > All this changed in 2012, when he attended an open access meeting > organised by SPARC in Kansas City. At that meeting, he says, he was > startled to hear SPARC announce to delegates that henceforth the sine qua > non of open access is that a work has to be made available with a CC BY > licence or equivalent attached. > > After the meeting Royster sought to clarify the situation with SPARC, > explaining the problems that its insistence on CC BY presented for > repository managers like him, since it is generally not possible to make > self-archived works available on a CC BY basis (not least because the > copyright will invariably have been assigned to a publisher). > Unfortunately, he says, his concerns fell on deaf ears. > > The only conclusion Royster could reach is that the OA movement no longer > views what he is doing as open access. As he puts it, ?[O]ur work in > promulgating Green OA (which normally does not convey re-use rights) and > our free-access publishing under non-exclusive permission-to-publish (i.e., > non-CC) agreements was henceforth disqualified.? > > If correct, what is striking here is the implication that institutional > repositories can no longer claim to be providing open access. > > In fact, if one refers to the most frequently cited definitions of open > access one discovers that what SPARC told Royster would seem to be in > order. Although it was written before the Creative Commons licences were > released, for instance, the definition of open access authored by those who > launched the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) in 2001 clearly seems > to describe the same terms as those expressed in the CC BY licence. > > What this means, of course, is that green OA does not meet the > requirements of the BOAI ? even though BOAI cited green OA as one of its > ?complementary strategies? for achieving open access. > > Since most of the OA movement?s claimed successes are green successes this > is particularly ironic. But given this, is it not pure pedantry to worry > about what appears to be a logical inconsistency at the heart of the OA > movement? No, not in light of the growing insistence that only CC BY will > do. If nothing else, it is alienating some of the movement?s best allies ? > people like Paul Royster for instance. > > ?I no longer call or think of myself as an advocate for ?open access,? > since the specific definition of that term excludes most of what we do in > our repository,? says Royster. ?I used to think the term meant ?free to > access, download, and store without charge, registration, log-in, etc.,? > but I have been disabused of that notion.? > > For that reason, he says, ?My current attitude regarding OA is to step > away and leave it alone; it does some good, despite what I see as its feet > of clay. I am not ?against? it, but I don't feel inspired to promote a > cause that makes the repositories second-class members.? > > How could this strange state of affairs have arisen? And why has it only > really become an issue now, over a decade after the BOAI definition was > penned? > > More here: > > http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/the-open-access-interviews-paul-royster.html > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Wed Sep 3 06:49:19 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:49:19 -0400 Subject: Peer-Review, Access-Locus and Citation Message-ID: *Comment on:* Lemire, Daniel (2014) *Though unrefereed, arXiv has a better h-index than most journals? * Arxiv includes both unrefereed and refereed versions of papers. Distinguish citation from access-date (early access ) and access-locus. Peer-reviewed publication is not the same thing as (or not only) access-provision: Journals provide both peer review and access (to subscribers only, if journal is subscription-based). Repositories provide access (to peer-reviewed journal articles and sometimes to earlier unrefereed drafts). Hence repositories do not have citation counts or h-indexes: just access-locus statistics; their citation counts are parasitic on journal citation counts (and especially journal peer review). Users access whatever version they can access, but they *cite* the journal article (the canonical, archival "version of record"). The only exception is unrefereed drafts -- but even there, it is the author's draft that is being cited; the repository is just the access-locus: Unrefereed drafts used to be cited as "*name, title, unpublished* (or 'in prep')" and refereed, accepted drafts used to be cited as "*name, title, journal, in press*)." Adding an OA access-locus to the journal citation is becoming an increasingly common (and desirable) scholarly practice, but it does not change the fact that what is being cited is the work, and the canonical version of the work is the refereed, published version-of-record, regardless of access-locus. Hence repositories do not have citation counts; they just have access-locus (download) counts. (Some interesting statistics can, however, be done on the citation of unrefereed vs refereed versions, i.e., early access .) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Wed Sep 3 09:34:44 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:34:44 +0000 Subject: IEEE Recommendations on Bibliometric Indicators Message-ID: Don Kraft, former JASIST editor and computer scientist, sent me the URL below for the new IEEE standards for the proper use of bibliometric indicators for evaluative purposes. Given the recent discussions on this SIGMETRICs, I thought that these standards may be of interest to this listserv. http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/ieee_bibliometric_statement_sept_2013.pdf The standards are entitled: Appropriate Use of Bibliometric Indicators for the Assessment of Journals, Research Proposals, and Individuals (Adopted by the IEEE Board of Directors 9 September 2013) The key point is summarized here: "....A common conclusion is the recognition of the need to use multiple indicators as well of the importance of peer review in the assessment of research quality, which resulted in the recommendation that bibliometric performance indicators should be applied only as a collective group (and not individually), and in conjunction with peer review following a clearly stated code of conduct." You will note that you should use these things only in conjunction with peer ratings, and this is from engineers. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Fri Sep 5 16:36:43 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:36:43 +0000 Subject: Papers of possible interest to readers of the SIG-Metrics List -September 5, 2014 Message-ID: *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339532900005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Inequality in societies, academic institutions and science journals: Gini and k-indices Authors: Ghosh, A; Chattopadhyay, N; Chakrabarti, BK Author Full Names: Ghosh, Asim; Chattopadhyay, Nachiketa; Chakrabarti, Bikas K. Source: PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 410 30-34; 10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.026 SEP 15 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Social inequality, Lorenz curves, Inequality indices, Power-laws Abstract: Social inequality is traditionally measured by the Gini-index (g). The g-index takes values from 0 to 1 where g = 0 represents complete equality and g = 1 represents complete inequality. Most of the estimates of the income or wealth data indicate the g value to be widely dispersed across the countries of the world: g values typically range from 0.30 to 0.65 at a particular time (year). We estimated similarly the Gini-index for the citations earned by the yearly publications of various academic institutions and the science journals. The ISI web of science data suggests remarkably strong inequality and universality (g = 0.70 +/- 0.07) across all the universities and institutions of the world, while for the journals we find g = 0.65 +/- 0.15 for any typical year. We define a new inequality measure, namely the k-index, saying that the cumulative income or citations of (1 - k) fraction of people or papers exceed those earned by the fraction (k) of the people or publications respectively. We find, while the k-index value for income ranges from 0.60 to 0.75 for income distributions across the world, it has a value around 0.75 +/- 0.05 for different universities and institutions across the world and around 0.77 +/- 0.10 for the science journals. Apart from above indices, we also analyze the same institution and journal citation data by measuring Pietra index and median index. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Ghosh, Asim; Chakrabarti, Bikas K.] Saha Inst Nucl Phys, Condensed Matter Phys Div, Kolkata 700064, India. [Chattopadhyay, Nachiketa] Indian Stat Inst, Sampling & Official Stat Unit, Kolkata 700108, India. [Chakrabarti, Bikas K.] Indian Stat Inst, Econ Res Unit, Kolkata 700108, India. E-mail Addresses: asimghosh066 at gmail.com; nachiketa at isical.ac.in; bikask.chakrabarti at saha.ac.in Cited Reference Count: 15 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0378-4371 eISSN: 1873-2119 Web of Science Categories: Physics, Multidisciplinary Research Areas: Physics IDS Number: AM0JW Unique ID: WOS:000339532900005 Cited References: Chakrabarti B.K., 2013, P7 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Gini C., 1921, Econom. J., V31, P124 Eliazar Iddo I., 2010, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V389, P117 BISHOP JA, 1991, ECONOMICA, V58, P461 Aoyama H., 2011, P25 Eliazar Iddo, 2014, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V401, P148 Pareto V., 1897, Cours d'Economie Politique, Pietra G., 1914, VLXXIV, P775 Yitzhaki S., 2012, The Gini Methodology, Eliazar Iddo I., 2012, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V391, P1323 Coulter P.B., 1989, Eom Young-Ho, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, SHORROCKS AF, 1983, ECONOMICA, V50, P3 Kleiber C., 2003, ======================================================================== *Record 3 of 40. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340202900002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Social Media Research: An Assessment of the Domain's Productivity and Intellectual Evolution Authors: van Osch, W; Coursaris, CK Author Full Names: van Osch, Wietske; Coursaris, Constantinos K. Source: COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 81 (3):285-309; 10.1080/03637751.2014.921720 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Social Media, Social Network Sites, Online Social Networks, Bibliographic Analysis, Research Productivity, Meta-analysis, Literature Review, Data Practices, Research Design KeyWords Plus: INFORMATION-SYSTEMS RESEARCH; CAPITAL ACADEMIC JOURNALS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS; GLOBAL RANKING; DISCIPLINE; SCIENCE; IMPACT; TECHNOLOGY Abstract: The purpose of this study is to conduct a bibliographic investigation and meta-analysis of the full body of social media scholarship produced over eight years, since the domain's emergence in 2004. A total of 610 journal and conference papers were carefully reviewed and subjected to bibliometric and meta-analysis techniques. A number of research questions pertaining to country, institutional, and individual productivity, as well as research design and data practices in the social media field, were proposed and answered. Our results reveal two main challenges faced by the field. First, the social media domain displays limited intellectual diversity in terms of productive and impactful actors-individual, institutions, and countries-as well as publications that have hitherto skewed the domain's focus in a limited direction. Second, the research design approaches and data practices characterizing the domain seem to reflect methodological singularity characterized by a strong tendency for cross-sectional, individual-level, survey or case-based studies. Furthermore, speculative and anecdotal evidence, based on personal opinions and armchair hypotheses, is extremely widespread and stand in the way of the domain's methodological and theoretical advancement. These challenges not only help to improve one's understanding of the identity and intellectual core of social media as a distinct scientific field but can also further prompt academic debate and careful (re)examination of the domain's scholarly practices and assumptions to ensure its future advancement in the most productive manner. Addresses: [van Osch, Wietske; Coursaris, Constantinos K.] Michigan State Univ, Dept Telecommun Informat Studies & Media, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA. E-mail Addresses: vanosch at msu.edu Cited Reference Count: 51 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 0363-7751 eISSN: 1479-5787 Web of Science Categories: Communication Research Areas: Communication IDS Number: AM9LK Unique ID: WOS:000340202900002 Cited References: Avital M., 2010, Proceedings of SIGPrag 2010 Workshop at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), (SIGPrag), Saint Louis, MO, Lyytinen Kalle, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V10, P715 PIERCE SJ, 1991, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V13, P21 Neufeld D., 2007, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, V19, P447 Serenko Alexander, 2009, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V13, P4 Serenko Alexander, 2013, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V17, P307 Serenko Alexander, 2010, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V14, P3 Ruiz V. R. L., 2011, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, V9, P259 Landry M., 1992, Accounting, Management and Information Technology, V2, P77 Bontis N., 2006, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, V2, P216 Garfield Eugene, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, V3, P173 Gibby R. E., 2002, The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, V34, P17 Bapna R., 2002, OR MS TODAY, V29, P34 LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V15, P333 Manning LM, 2005, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, V22, P273 Payne G., 2004, Key concepts in social research, Kaplan Andreas M., 2010, BUSINESS HORIZONS, V53, P59 Avital M, 2000, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V11, P665 Straub Detmar, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V7, P241 Surrette M. A., 2002, The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, V40, P113 PRITCHAR.A, 1969, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V25, P348 Merton R. K., 1973, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations., Cheng CH, 1999, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V46, P4 Chong E., 2011, 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, Kauai, HI, P1 Ruth S., 2003, V2, P581 Inzelt Annamaria, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V78, P37 Abrahamson Eric, 2009, SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V25, P235 Serenko A., 2009, Journal of Intellectual Capital, V10, Vokurka R. J., 1996, Journal of Operations Management, V14, P345 Coursaris C. K., 2014, A meta-analysis of theories and topics in social media research, Leydesdorff L, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICSProceedings of the Erasmus Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies, MAY 21-24, 1996, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, V38, P155 Serenko Alexander, 2013, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V17, P773 Serenko A., 2004, Knowledge and Process Management, V11, P185 Orlikowski W. J., 1991, Information Systems Research, V2, P1 Im K. S., 1998, Decision Line, V29, P8 Goodrum AA, 2001, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V37, P661 LANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159 Serenko Alexander, 2013, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V17, P137 Walther Joseph B., 2012, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, V18, P2 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Cocosila Mihail, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P1 GROVER V, 1992, DATA BASE, V23, P5 Robey D, 1996, INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, V7, P400 Leonardi Paul M., 2013, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, V19, P1 ABRAHAMSON E, 1991, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V16, P586 Serenko Alexander, 2008, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, V25, P279 Hart PW, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V42, P299 Price D. J. D, 1963, Big science, little science., Donath J, 2004, BT TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, V22, P71 Sidorova Anna, 2008, MIS QUARTERLY, V32, P467 Treem J., 2012, Communication Yearbook, V36, P143 ======================================================================== *Record 5 of 40. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340246100021 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct Authors: Bosch, X Author Full Names: Bosch, Xavier Source: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 40 (9):644-646; 10.1136/medethics-2013-101822 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: ASSOCIATION; STANDARDS Abstract: Scientific journals may incur scientific error if articles are tainted by research misconduct. While some journals' ethical policies, especially those on conflicts of interest, have improved over recent years, with some adopting a uniform approach, only around half of biomedical journals, principally those with higher impact factors, currently have formal misconduct policies, mainly for handling allegations. Worryingly, since a response to allegations would reasonably require an a priori definition, far fewer journals have publicly available definitions of misconduct. While some journals and editors' associations have taken significant steps to prevent and detect misconduct and respond to allegations, the content, visibility of and access to these policies varies considerably. In addition, while the lack of misconduct policies may prompt and maintain a de novo approach for journals, potentially causing stress, publication delays and even legal disputes, the lack of uniformity may be a matter of contention for research stakeholders such as editors, authors and their institutions, and publishers. Although each case may need an individual approach, I argue that posting highly visible, readily accessible, comprehensive, consistent misconduct policies could prevent the publication of fraudulent papers, increase the number of retractions of already published papers and, perhaps, reduce research misconduct. Although legally problematic, a concerted approach, with sharing of information between editors, which is clearly explained in journal websites, could also help. Ideally, journals, editors' associations, and publishers should seek consistency and homogenise misconduct policies to maintain public confidence in the integrity of biomedical research publications. Addresses: Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Dept Internal Med, IDIBAPS, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail Addresses: xavbosch at clinic.ub.es Cited Reference Count: 16 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE, TAVISTOCK SQUARE, LONDON WC1H 9JR, ENGLAND ISSN: 0306-6800 eISSN: 1473-4257 Web of Science Categories: Ethics; Medical Ethics; Social Issues; Social Sciences, Biomedical Research Areas: Social Sciences - Other Topics; Medical Ethics; Social Issues; Biomedical Social Sciences IDS Number: AN0BI Unique ID: WOS:000340246100021 Cited References: Benninger MS, 2005, ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, V131, P381 Fanelli Daniele, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Williams Peter, 2013, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, V19, P1 Blum Jared A., 2009, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V302, P2230 Bosch Xavier, 2012, ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V172, P70 Kohler Christian S., 2012, DIABETES, V61, P38 Abdulreda MH, 2013, The Scientist, Steen R. Grant, 2011, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, V37, P688 Committee on Publication Ethics, Forum discussion topic: sharing of information among editors-in-chief regarding possible misconduct, Fanelli Daniele, 2013, PLOS MEDICINE, V10, Bosch Xavier, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Miano Joseph M., 2010, ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, V30, P1 Resnik David B., 2010, ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, V17, P79 Altman Douglas G., 2013, BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V347, Resnik David B., 2009, ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, V16, P254 Steen R. Grant, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340207600006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The role of detachment of in-links in scale-free networks Authors: Lansky, P; Polito, F; Sacerdote, L Author Full Names: Lansky, P.; Polito, F.; Sacerdote, L. Source: JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, 47 (34):10.1088/1751-8113/47/34/345002 AUG 29 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Yule model, birth-death process, preferential attachment, detachment of links KeyWords Plus: ORDER STATISTIC PROPERTY; POINT-PROCESSES; ZIPFS LAW; MODEL; DISTRIBUTIONS Abstract: Real-world networks may exhibit a detachment phenomenon determined by the canceling of previously existing connections. We discuss a tractable extension of the Yule model to account for this feature. Analytical results are derived and discussed both asymptotically and for a finite number of links. Comparison with the original model is performed in the supercritical case. The first-order asymptotic tail behavior of the two models is similar but differences arise in the second-order term. We explicitly refer to world wide web modeling and we show the agreement of the proposed model on very recent data. However, other possible network applications are also mentioned. Addresses: [Lansky, P.] Acad Sci Czech Republic, Inst Physiol, Prague 4, Czech Republic. [Polito, F.; Sacerdote, L.] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Matemat G Peano, I-10123 Turin, Italy. E-mail Addresses: federico.polito at unito.it Funding Acknowledgement: AMALFI (Universita di Torino/Compagnia di San Paolo); Institute of Physiology [RVO67985823]; Centre for Neuroscience [P304/12/G069] Funding Text: All the authors have been supported by project AMALFI (Universita di Torino/Compagnia di San Paolo). Petr Lansky has also been supported by Institute of Physiology RVO67985823 and the Centre for Neuroscience P304/12/G069. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their useful comments and criticisms which improved the quality of the paper. Cited Reference Count: 37 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: IOP PUBLISHING LTD, TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND ISSN: 1751-8113 eISSN: 1751-8121 Article Number: 345002 Web of Science Categories: Physics, Multidisciplinary; Physics, Mathematical Research Areas: Physics IDS Number: AM9NF Unique ID: WOS:000340207600006 Cited References: Spanier J, 1987, An Atlas of Functions, PURI PS, 1982, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, V19, P39 Daalhuis A.B.O., 2010, Analysis and Applications, V8, Yule GU, 1925, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-CONTAINING PAPERS OF A BIOLOGICAL CHARACTER, V213, P21 Shi D., 2006, EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, V76, P731 Newman MEJ, 2005, CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS, V46, P323 Barabasi Albert-Laszlo, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P412 Reed WJ, 2002, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V217, P125 Simkin M. V., 2011, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V502, P1 Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 Caldarelli G, 2000, EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, V52, P386 Olver F W J, 2010, Maruvka Y E, 2011, PloS One, V6, P26480 SIMON HA, 1955, BIOMETRIKA, V42, P425 Crump K S, 1975, Sankhya A, V37, P396 Soares DJB, 2005, EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, V70, P70 Gil A, 2007, Numerical Methods for Special Functions, Reed WJ, 2002, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V66, Gradshteyn I S, 2007, Grabowski A., 2010, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V82, FEIGIN PD, 1979, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, V16, P297 Fenner T, 2005, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V355, P641 Patzkowsky ME, 1995, PALEOBIOLOGY, V21, P440 Barabasi AL, 2000, PHYSICA A50th Taiwan International Symposium on Statistical Physics, AUG 09-12, 1999, TAIPEI, TAIWAN, V281, P69 Mitzenmacher M., 2004, Internet Math, V1, P226 Bailey N T J, 1964, The Elements of Stochastic Processes with Applications to the Natural Sciences, Erdelyi A, 1953, Higher Transcendental Functions, Maruvka Yosef E., 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V110, PE2460 Johnson NL, 2005, UNIVARIATE DISCRETE DISTRIBUTIONS, 3RD EDITION, P1 Neuts M, 1971, J. Aust. Math. Soc., V12, P473 Abramowitz M, 1972, Aldous D, 2005, ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, V37, P1094 Gabaix X, 1999, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V114, P739 LANSKY P, 1980, JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V21, P53 Noh J D, 2005, Phys. Rev. E, V71, Maruvka Yosi E., 2010, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V262, P245 Saichev A, 2010, Theory of Zipf's Law and Beyond, =================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339819800014 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 boxed plus 1=2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions Authors: Sornette, D; Maillart, T; Ghezzi, G Author Full Names: Sornette, Didier; Maillart, Thomas; Ghezzi, Giacomo Source: PLOS ONE, 9 (8):10.1371/journal.pone.0103023 AUG 1 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: POWER-LAW DISTRIBUTIONS; ZIPFS LAW; PERFORMANCE; MODELS; TEAMS; ABILITY; SYSTEM; GROWTH; CITIES; LEVEL Abstract: In a variety of open source software projects, we document a superlinear growth of production intensity (R similar to c(beta)) as a function of the number of active developers c, with a median value of the exponent beta similar or equal to 4/3, with large dispersions of beta from slightly less than 1 up to 3. For a typical project in this class, doubling of the group size multiplies typically the output by a factor 2(beta)=2.5, explaining the title. This superlinear law is found to hold for group sizes ranging from 5 to a few hundred developers. We propose two classes of mechanisms, interaction-based and large deviation, along with a cascade model of productive activity, which unifies them. In this common framework, superlinear productivity requires that the involved social groups function at or close to criticality, or in a "superradiance" mode, in the sense of the appearance of a cooperative process and order involving a collective mode of developers defined by the build up of correlation between the contributions of developers. In addition, we report the first empirical test of the renormalization of the exponent of the distribution of the sizes of first generation events into the renormalized exponent of the distribution of clusters resulting from the cascade of triggering over all generation in a critical branching process in the non-meanfield regime. Finally, we document a size effect in the strength and variability of the superlinear effect, with smaller groups exhibiting widely distributed superlinear exponents, some of them characterizing highly productive teams. In contrast, large groups tend to have a smaller superlinearity and less variability. Addresses: [Sornette, Didier] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Management Technol & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland. [Maillart, Thomas] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Informat, Berkeley, CA USA. [Ghezzi, Giacomo] Univ Zurich, Dept Informat, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: dsornette at ethz.ch Funding Acknowledgement: Swiss National Science Foundation [PA00P2-145368] Funding Text: One of the authors (T.M.) acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant Nr. PA00P2-145368). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Cited Reference Count: 73 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA ISSN: 1932-6203 Article Number: e103023 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AM4JL Unique ID: WOS:000339819800014 Cited References: Toulouse G, 1978, Revue Francaise de Sociologie, V19, Raasch Christina, 2009, R & D MANAGEMENT, V39, P382 Lin Y, 2006, Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, V12, P53 Bettencourt Luis M. A., 2013, SCIENCE, V340, P1438 Bettencourt LMA, 2010, PloS one, V5, O'Mahony Siobhan, 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V50, P1079 Halfaker Aaron, 2013, AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, V57, P664 Smith A, 1776, The Wealth of NationsBantam Classics, Zhang Qunzhi, 2011, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V390, P4124 Jorgensen SE, 2012, Introduction to Systems Ecology (Applied Ecology and Environmental Management), Crane Riley, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P15649 DICKE RH, 1954, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V93, P99 Maillart T, 2008, Physical Review Letters, V101, Clauset Aaron, 2009, SIAM REVIEW, V51, P661 ANDERSON PW, 1963, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V130, P439 Gordon K, 1924, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, V7, P398 LAUGHLIN PR, 1966, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V2, P407 Sornette D, 2006, Ramsden JJ, 2000, PHYSICA A, V277, P220 GROSS M, 1982, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V93, P301 JOHN S, 1995, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V74, P3419 Grimmett GR, 1994, Probability and phase transition, V420, Arthur WB, 1994, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Economics, Cognition, and Society), Crowston K, 2005, First Monday, V10, Bettencourt Luis M. A., 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P7301 Galam S, 2012, What is Sociophysics About, Filimonov Vladimir, 2014, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, V42, P174 Gowers Timothy, 2009, NATURE, V461, P879 Filimonov Vladimir, 2012, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V85, Coase R. H., 1937, ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, V4, P386 INGHAM AG, 1974, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V10, P371 Maillart T., 2011, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V83, Wuchty Stefan, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1036 Domb C, 1979, Phase transitions and critical phenomena, V1-20, Baldwin A, 2012, Workshop of Economics of Information Security (WEIS 2012), Ostrom E, 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Deschatres F, 2005, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V72, Benkler Y, 2002, The Yale Law Journal, V112, Helmstetter AS, 2003, GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, V30, Humphrey G, 1924, JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, V15, P401 Saichev A, 2005, PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, V162, P1113 SUNDSTROM E, 1990, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V45, P120 Zhou WX, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V272, P439 Ennen Edgar, 2010, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V36, P207 Madey G, 2002, Americas conf. on Information Systems (AMCIS2002), P1806 Saichev A. I., 2010, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V75, P343 Harris TE, 2002, The theory of branching processes, Sacramento GA, 2006, Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, V12, P81 BOUCHAUD JP, 1990, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V195, P127 Ait-Sahalia Y, 2010, V15850, Liggett TM, 2005, Interacting particle systems, Mohler G. O., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, V106, P100 Krugman P, 1996, The Self Organizing Economy, Damoiseaux Jessica S., 2009, BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, V213, P525 Bettencourt Luis, 2010, NATURE, V467, P912 Neuman GA, 1999, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, V84, P376 TZINER A, 1985, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, V70, P85 Saichev A, 2004, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V70, Benedict M, 1996, Super-radiance multiatomic coherent emission, Cohen SG, 1997, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V23, P239 Malevergne Y., 2013, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, V37, P1195 ANDERSON PW, 1972, SCIENCE, V177, P393 Shaw ME, 1932, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, V44, P491 Woolley Anita Williams, 2010, SCIENCE, V330, P686 Daley DJ, 2003, An introduction to the theory of point processes, Helmstetter A, 2002, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, V107, HAWKES AG, 1974, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, V11, P493 Saichev A. I., 2011, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V83, P271 Saichev AI, 2009, Cardy JL, 1988, Finite-size Scaling, V2, Saichev A, 2014, Physical Review E, V89, Saichev AI, 2013, The European Physical Journal B, V86, P1 Sornette D, 2004, Physical Review Letters, V93, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340098000001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The 100 top-cited classic papers in hand surgery Authors: Joyce, CW; Kelly, JC; Carroll, SM Author Full Names: Joyce, C. W.; Kelly, J. C.; Carroll, S. M. Source: JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 48 (4):227-233; 10.3109/2000656X.2013.840640 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citation, classic papers, hand surgery, most-cited, top 100 KeyWords Plus: FLEXOR TENDON REPAIR; CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME; DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES; TRIANGULAR FIBROCARTILAGE COMPLEX; SCAPHOLUNATE ADVANCED COLLAPSE; EARLY ACTIVE MOBILIZATION; PROXIMAL ROW CARPECTOMY; BASAL JOINT ARTHRITIS; CITATION-CLASSICS; BRACHIAL-PLEXUS Abstract: The number of citations that a published article has received reflects the importance that paper has on that area of practice. In hand surgery, it is unknown which journal articles are cited most frequently. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the characteristics of the top 100 papers in the field of hand surgery. The 100 most cited papers were identified in the following journals; the Journal of Hand Surgery (American volume), the Journal of Hand Surgery (European volume), the Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European volume), The Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Hand Clinics, and the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. The articles were ranked in order of the number of citations received. These classic 100 papers were analyzed for article type, their journal distribution, as well as geographic and institutional origin. Addresses: [Joyce, C. W.] Univ Hosp Galway, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Galway, Ireland. [Kelly, J. C.] Cappagh Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dublin, Ireland. [Carroll, S. M.] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Dublin 4, Ireland. E-mail Addresses: cjoyce78 at hotmail.com Cited Reference Count: 118 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 52 VANDERBILT AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA ISSN: 2000-656X eISSN: 2000-6764 Web of Science Categories: Orthopedics; Surgery Research Areas: Orthopedics; Surgery IDS Number: AM8CR Unique ID: WOS:000340098000001 Cited References: WATSON HK, 1984, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V9A, P358 ELLIOT D, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V19B, P607 ARMSTRONG AL, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V19B, P340 GU YD, 1992, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V17B, P518 Garfield E, 1999, CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, V161, P979 AGEE JM, 1992, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V17A, P987 PELLEGRINI VD, 1991, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V16A, P967 ARMSTRONG TJ, 1987, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V12A, P830 RUBY LK, 1988, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V13A, P1 DELLON AL, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V14A, P688 MAYFIELD JK, 1980, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V5, P226 PALMER AK, 1985, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V10A, P39 SZABO RM, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V14A, P624 AXELROD TS, 1990, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V15A, P1 RYU J, 1991, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V16A, P409 SILFVERSKIOLD KL, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V19A, P53 MORRISON WA, 1980, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V5, P575 PELLEGRINI VD, 1986, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V11A, P309 LIEBER RL, 1992, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V17A, P787 Aoki M, 1997, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V22A, P107 Baltussen A, 2004, ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, V98, P443 KRAKAUER JD, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V19A, P751 GARFIELD E, 1987, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V257, P52 Lundborg G, 2000, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V25A, P391 Klein MB, 2002, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V27A, P615 Institute for Scientific Information, Science Citation Index Expanded 1946-2006, GELBERMAN RH, 1982, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V7, P170 Loonen MP, 2008, Plast Reconstr Surg, V121, P320 SHEETZ KK, 1995, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V20A, P902 BOWERS WH, 1985, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V10A, P169 LAVERNIA CJ, 1992, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V17A, P354 LUNDBORG G, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V19B, P277 McLarney E, 1999, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V24A, P295 COONEY WP, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V19A, P143 PALMER AK, 1981, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V6, P153 Seglen PO, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P498 EATON RG, 1987, HAND CLINICS, V3, P455 OGATA K, 1986, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V11B, P10 HERMANSDORFER JD, 1991, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V16A, P340 Kopylov P, 1996, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V21B, P768 Orbay JL, 2002, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V27A, P205 WILGIS EFS, 1986, HAND CLINICS, V2, P761 PHALEN GS, 1966, JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, VA 48, P211 BELLKROTOSKI J, 1987, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V12A, P155 WATSON HK, 1980, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V5, P320 DUBIN D, 1993, ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, V129, P1121 POGUE DJ, 1990, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V15A, P721 FRIEDMAN SL, 1991, HAND CLINICS, V7, P295 CAMPBELL FM, 1990, BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V78, P376 CULLEN KW, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V14B, P392 LUNDBORG G, 1982, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V7, P252 MASEAR VR, 1986, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V11A, P222 COONEY WP, 1980, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V5, P343 Kelly J. C., 2010, JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, V92B, P1338 STRAUCH B, 1990, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V15A, P148 Rozental TD, 2006, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V31A, P359 PEIMER CA, 1986, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V11A, P624 Winters SC, 1998, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V23A, P97 GRUNDBERG AB, 1983, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V8, P348 AMADIO PC, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V14A, P679 TRUMBLE TE, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V19A, P325 DELLON AL, 1987, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V12A, P693 CLARKE HM, 1995, HAND CLINICS, V11, P563 ZANCOLLI EA, 1988, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V13B, P130 KULICK MI, 1986, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V11A, P59 TOMAINO MM, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V19A, P134 Chung KC, 1998, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V23A, P575 ZAIDEMBERG C, 1991, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V16A, P474 SMALL JO, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V14B, P383 PALMER AK, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V14A, P594 LUNDBORG G, 1982, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V7, P580 Picknett T, 1999, Journal of molecular biology, V293, P171 Bosker BH, 2006, JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, V88B, P156 TALEISNIK J, 1984, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V9A, P350 SOLLERMAN C, 1995, SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, V29, P167 Fenton JE, 2002, JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY9th Meeting of the British-Society-of-History-of-ENT, SEP, 2001, BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND, V116, P494 Garfield E, 1998, ANAESTHESIST, V47, P439 SCHUIND F, 1992, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V17A, P291 EATON RG, 1984, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V9A, P692 Orbay JL, 2004, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V29A, P96 FERNANDEZ DL, 1991, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V16A, P375 Merrell GA, 2001, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V26A, P303 GREEN DP, 1985, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V10A, P597 GELBERMAN RH, 1980, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V5, P508 Paladugu R, 2002, WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, V26, P1099 RYDEVIK B, 1981, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V6, P3 Ring D, 1997, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V22A, P777 MacDermid JC, 2000, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V25A, P330 DUNCAN KH, 1987, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V12A, P384 BURTON RI, 1986, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V11A, P324 Strickland JW, 2000, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V25A, P214 LISTER G, 1988, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V13A, P22 CROSBY CA, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V19A, P665 BRANDT KE, 1993, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V18A, P726 PALMER AK, 1982, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V7, P376 TAMAI S, 1982, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V7, P549 Carter PR, 1998, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V23A, P300 Mehlman Charles T., 2006, JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, V26, P691 SAVAGE R, 1985, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V10B, P135 STRICKLAND JW, 1980, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V5, P537 HOTCHKISS RN, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V14, P256 SooHoo NF, 2002, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V27A, P537 Kambouroglou GK, 1998, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V23A, P737 LIEBER RL, 1990, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V15A, P244 BRAND PW, 1981, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V6, P209 HERZBERG G, 1993, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V18A, P768 Cohen MS, 2001, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V26A, P94 SHORT WH, 1987, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V12A, P529 Nathan PA, 1996, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V21B, P701 VIEGAS SF, 1993, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V18A, P463 MATHIOWETZ V, 1984, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V9A, P222 KEITH MW, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V14A, P524 SAVAGE R, 1989, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, V14B, P396 LICHTMAN DM, 1981, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V6, P515 OBERLIN C, 1994, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V19A, P232 Loonen Martijn P. J., 2007, PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, V120, P2082 Link AM, 1998, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION3rd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, SEP, 1997, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC, V280, P246 EPNER RA, 1982, JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V7, P298 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340012000002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Are our all research journals scholarly and peer reviewed? Authors: Singh, A Author Full Names: Singh, Anil Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 107 (2):161-161; JUL 25 2014 Language: English Document Type: Letter Addresses: Competit Commiss India, New Delhi 110066, India. E-mail Addresses: dr.anilsingh5 at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AM6YN Unique ID: WOS:000340012000002 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339984400012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Bibliometric analysis of the scientific journal Transinformacao Authors: Andre, CD; Pinto, AL; Matias, M; Dutra, ML; Gonzales-Aguilar, A Author Full Names: Andre, Cleber-Da-Silva; Pinto, Adilson-Luiz; Matias, Marcio; Dutra, Moises-Lima; Gonzales-Aguilar, Audilio Source: PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 23 (4):433-442; JUL-AUG 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometrics, Bradford law, Lotka law, Zipf law. Price theory, Transinformacao KeyWords Plus: INFORMATION Abstract: This paper proposes the application of the three main Bibliometrics laws-Lotka, Zipf, and Bradford- to address the following questions: (i) How to be sure of the quality of publishers and contents in scholarly publishing, and (ii) How to determine content reliability. Our main goal is to evaluate the visibility of Transinformacao, a Brazilian scholarly journal in the information science area, according to its productivity, citation counts, and performance indicators. This study focusses on the concepts of Bibliometrics and Scholarly Journals, presenting a brief history of scholarly publishing and its accessibility in Brazil, as well as the software tools used in this work. This is an exploratory documentary study, based on descriptive mixed methods (i.e., both qualitative and quantitative), that analyzes 24 years of Transinformacao issues, from its first edition in 1989 to 2011. Descriptive statistics tables are used to show the results obtained from analyses carried out with Publish or perish, Microsoft Excel, and Web of science Citespace tools. Addresses: [Pinto, Adilson-Luiz; Matias, Marcio; Dutra, Moises-Lima] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Ciencia Informacao, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil. [Gonzales-Aguilar, Audilio] Univ Montpellier I, F-34006 Montpellier, France. [Gonzales-Aguilar, Audilio] Univ Montpellier 3, F-34032 Montpellier, France. E-mail Addresses: cleber_csa at yahoo.com.br; adilson at cin.ufsc.br; matias97 at gmail.com; moises.dutra at ufsc.br; audilio.gonzales at univ-montp3.fr Cited Reference Count: 15 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: EPI, APARTADO 32 280, BARCELONA, 08080, SPAIN ISSN: 1386-6710 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AM6OL Unique ID: WOS:000339984400012 Cited References: Da-Cunha Miriam-Vieira, 1985, Ciencia da informacao, Brasilia, V14, P37 Ferreira Ana-Gabriela-Clipes, 2010, Datagramazero: Revista de dencia do informacao, Rio de Janeiro, V11, Kobashi Nair-Yumiko, 2009, Tendencias do pesquisa brasileira em ciencia do informactio, V2, P155 Pinheiro Renatha-James-Diogenes, 2009, Mapeamento do conceito de informacao: urn estudo bibliometrico nos periodicos TransInformacao e Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao, Tannuri de Oliveira Ely Francina, 2011, PERSPECTIVAS EM CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, V16, P16 Guedes Vania L. S., 2005, Actas VI Encontro nacional de ciencia do informacao (Cinform), Salvador, Araujo Carlos-Alberto-Avila, 2006, Em questao, Porto Alegre, V12, P11 de Meira Gusmao Alexandre Oliveira, 2010, PERSPECTIVAS EM CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, V15, P44 Gil Antonio-Carlos, 1991, Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa, Borgman Christine L., 2002, Annual review of information science and technology, V36, P2 Quoniam L., 2001, Ciencia da Informacao, V30, de Souza Vanz Samile Andrea, 2010, INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS, V20, P67 Urbizagastegui-Alvarado Ruben, 1984, Ciencia do informacao, Brasilia, V13, P91 Aventurier Pascal, 2013, Hypotheses.org, Sa-Silva Jackson-Ronie, 2009, Revista brasileira de historia & ciencias socials, V1, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340210900004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Preliminary Study of the Relationship between the h-Index and Excess Citations Authors: Yuan, XY; Hua, WN; Rousseau, R; Ye, FY Author Full Names: Yuan, Xiaoyuan; Hua, Weina; Rousseau, Ronald; Ye, Fred Y. Source: CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, 38 (2):127-144; JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: h-index, h-core, excess citations KeyWords Plus: HIRSCH-INDEX; LOTKAIAN INFORMETRICS; IMPACT FACTOR; TAIL; DISTRIBUTIONS; COUNTRIES; SCALES; MODEL; CORE Abstract: This article presents a study of the average number of excess citations of papers in the h-core, denoted as e(2)/h and the ratio between the e-area and the h-area, denoted as e(2)/h(2). Real-world citation data from different countries are studied. It is found that at the country level, a small set of publications generate a disproportionately large amount of citations. Although different countries have different e(2)/h(2) values in different fields, average e(2)/h(2) values are all above 1. The e(2)/h values vary widely between fields, reflecting the general citation density in these fields. For cumulative data e(2)/h(2) and e(2)/h values each converge quickly. Neither a shifted Zipf nor an exponential model could fit the data. Addresses: [Yuan, Xiaoyuan] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Lib Nanjing Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. [Hua, Weina; Ye, Fred Y.] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. [Rousseau, Ronald] Univ Antwerp, IBW, Inst Educ & Informat Sci, Antwerp, Belgium. [Rousseau, Ronald] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Math, Leuven, Belgium. E-mail Addresses: yuanxy at nju.edu.cn; huawn at nju.edu.cn; ronald.rousseau at uantwerpen.be; yye at nju.edu.cn Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CANADIAN ASSOC INFORMATION SCIENCE, PO BOX 6174, STATION J, OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2A 1T2, CANADA ISSN: 1195-096X Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AM9OM Unique ID: WOS:000340210900004 Cited References: Ye Fred Y., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1208 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Rousseau R., 2006, Science Focus, V1, P23 Egghe Leo, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1637 Ye Fred Y., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P431 SCImago, 2007, SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Egghe Leo, 2010, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V44, P65 Alonso S., 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P273 Egghe Leo, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P295 Egghe Leo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1048 Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 Burrell Quentin L., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P774 Csajbok Edit, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V73, P91 Burrell Quentin L., 2008, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V44, P1794 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Liu Joan Q., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P190 Hobbs Richard, 2009, RESTORATION ECOLOGY, V17, P1 Albarran Pedro, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P40 Liu Yuxian, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P59 Rousseau R., 2013, Modelling Some Structural Indicators in an h-Index Context: A Shifted Zipf and a Decreasing Exponential Model, Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P121 Burrell Quentin L., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P1504 Fanelli Daniele, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P891 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P697 Zhang C. T., 2013, Scientific Reports, V3, P1 Ye Fred Y., 2008, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V2, P288 Liu Yuxian, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P235 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P187 Laherrere J, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V2, P525 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Chen Dar-zen, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P129 Liang Liming, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 112th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 14-17, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, V1, P143 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P625 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Obliteration by Incorporation Authors: McCain, KW Author Full Names: McCain, Katherine W. Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 129-149; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION; CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE; SLEEPING BEAUTIES; FOCUSED INTERVIEW; CITER MOTIVATIONS; ORTEGA HYPOTHESIS; CITING BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT SYMBOLS; BIG SCIENCE Addresses: Drexel Univ, iSch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. E-mail Addresses: mccainkw at drexel.edu Cited Reference Count: 91 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300008 Cited References: Lambe Patrick, 2011, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V15, P175 Marx Werner, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P433 Schwartz CA, 1997, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V58, P19 Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, MERTON RK, 1987, PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, V51, P550 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 McCain Katherine W., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1412 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 Harwood Nigel, 2009, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V41, P497 McCain K. W., 2012, METRICS 2012, SIG/Metrics preconference workshop at ASIST 2012, Baltimore, PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Borgman Christine L., 2002, Annual review of information science and technology, V36, P2 SOUTHERN EM, 1975, JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, V98, P503 BROOKS TA, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P223 HighWire Press, 2012, Free online full-text articles, MACROBERTS MH, 1988, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V39, P432 MACROBERTS MH, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P293 White HD, 2004, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V25, P89 BROOKS TA, 1986, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V37, P34 Edge D, 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching, V17, P102 SZAVAKOVATS E, 1994, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V20, P55 MCCAIN KW, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V17, P127 Costas Rodrigo, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P329 COLE JR, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC, P281 Franck G, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P53 Furner J, 2003, JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, V35, P189 Marx Werner, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P1 Leonard-Barton D., 1995, Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, THOMAS KS, 1992, SCIENTOMETRICS, V24, P405 GARFIELD E, 1975, CURRENT CONTENTS, P5 Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 Bjork B.-C., 2007, Information Research, V12, CANO V, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P284 ROUSSEAU R, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V11, P217 MacRoberts M. H., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 STENT GS, 1972, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, V227, P84 Small H., 1980, Scientometrics, V2, P270 GARFIELD E, 1980, CURRENT CONTENTS, P5 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to cybermetrics, Stigler S. M., 1980, Science and social structure: A Festschrift for Robert K. Merton, P147 McCain K. W., 2012, Pre-Conference on the History of ASIST and Information Science and Technology, ASIST 2012, Baltimore, SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Braun Tibor, 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P195 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, HOERMAN HL, 1995, LIBRARY QUARTERLYAmerican-Society-for-Information-Science Miniconference, APR 24, 1993, BLOOMINGTON, IN, V65, P415 Merton R. K., 1965, On the shoulders of giants: A Shandean perspective, STIGLER SM, 1994, STATISTICAL SCIENCE, V9, P94 Garfield E, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P69 Small H, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P143 HARGENS LL, 1984, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V49, P685 Bottom W. P., 2007, The palimpsestic syndrome in management research: Stereotypes and the obliteration process, AVERSA ES, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P383 Wouters P., 1999, The citation culture, Merton R. K., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, Pix MERTON RK, 1972, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V78, P9 White MD, 1997, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V67, P122 VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 MERTON RK, 1988, ISIS, V79, P606 Hyland K., 1999, Applied Linguistics, V20, P541 Schneider Jesper W., 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P573 Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Burrell Quentin L., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1466 Garfield E., 1977, Essays of an Information Scientist, V3, P1 Merton Robert K., 1946, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V51, P541 Kahneman D, 2003, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V93, P1449 Messeri P., 1978, annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, ZUCKERMAN H, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P329 Case DO, 2000, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V51, P635 Wenger E., 1991, Situated Learning, GARVEY WD, 1967, SCIENCE, V157, P1011 Cronin B., 1984, The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, STERN RE, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P193 Dervos D. A., 2008, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V45, P1 GARFIELD E, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P487 MCCAIN KW, 2006, MYTHICAL MONTH J INF, V32, P277 CRONIN B, 1981, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V3, P27 Small H., 1982, V3, P287 McCain Katherine W., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P2129 van Raan AFJ, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P467 COZZENS SE, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V15, P437 Merton R. K., 1956, The focused interview, Gorraiz Juan, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P627 Newman MEJ, 2003, SIAM REVIEW, V45, P167 Brooks Jr F. P., 1975, The mythical man-month, Wang PL, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V50, P98 MACROBERTS MH, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P342 Harwood Nigel, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P253 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300017 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Bibliographic References in Web 2.0 Authors: Bar-Ilan, J; Shema, H; Thelwall, M Author Full Names: Bar-Ilan, Judit; Shema, Hadas; Thelwall, Mike Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 307-325; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter Addresses: [Bar-Ilan, Judit; Shema, Hadas] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Informat Sci, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel. [Bar-Ilan, Judit] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Sch Lib Arch & Informat Studies, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel. [Thelwall, Mike] Wolverhampton Univ, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England. [Thelwall, Mike] Wolverhampton Univ, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England. [Thelwall, Mike] Oxford Internet Inst, Oxford, England. E-mail Addresses: Judit.Bar-Ilan at biu.ac.il; dassysh at gmail.com; m.thelwall at wlv.ac.uk Cited Reference Count: 57 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300017 Cited References: Shema H., 2012, PLoS ONE, V7, Elsevier, 2012, What does it cover?, Schiermeier Q., 2012, Nature, Bonetta Laura, 2007, CELL, V129, P443 Kraker P., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on the World Wide Web, P1017 Impact, 2012, Oxford English Dictionary, Bukvova H., 2011, First Monday, V16, PERITZ BC, 1995, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V21, P63 Butler D, 2006, NATURE, V442, P9 Harley D., 2010, Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines, Zivkovic B., 2011, Blog post, Bar-Ilan J., 2012, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, V1, P98 RICE BA, 1979, SERIALS LIBRARIAN, V4, P35 Gruzd A., 2011, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Conference, Gurney T., 2010, WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, Raleigh, NC, Kipp Margaret E. I., 2011, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, V35, P17 Ke Hao-Ren, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P43 Bar-Ilan J., 2011, 2011 ASIS & T SIG/MET Symposium on Informetric and Scientometric Research (Metrics 2011), New Orleans, Ma N., 2009, BibSonomy anatomy. Viszards Session at Sunbelt 2009, RIN, 2011, A Research Information Network Report, Pett-Ridge J., 2010, Science, Overbye D., 2010, New York Times, PD4 Davis P., 2012, Blog post, Kousha Kayvan, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P124 Costas Rodrigo, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 17-20, 2008, Vienna, AUSTRIA, V82, P517 Lin T, 2012, New York TimesFebruary 14, PD7 Kurtz M. J., 2010, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, V44, P1 Saeed A. U., 2008, Proceedings of the 2008 Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, Washington, DC, P605 Ponte Diego, 2011, SERIALS REVIEW, V37, P149 Lee D. H., 2010, Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium, P445 Nicholas D., 2011, Information Services & Use, V31, CRONIN B, 1981, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V37, P16 Li Xue Feng, 2011, SPINE, V36, PE1245 National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics, 2010, Special Report NSF 11-306, Hull D., 2010, Blog post, Borrego Angel, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V38, P297 De Vrieze J., 2012, Science Insider, [Anonymous], 2011, Nature Medicine, V17, P1 Whitfield J., 2012, Nature, Oransky I., 2012, A first? Papers retracted for citation manipulation [Blog post], RIN, 2009, Patterns of information use and exchange: Case studies of researchers in the life sciences . A Research Information Network Report, Gowers T., 2012, Blog post, Bar-Ilan J., 2012, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V38, Haustein Stefanie, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P446 National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics, 2010, Science & engineering indicators: 2010, Chapter 2: Higher education in science and engineering, Bar-Ilan J., 2012, ACM Web Science Conference Workshop on Altmetrics, Evanston, IL, Thomson Reuters, 2011, The definitive resource for global research: Web of Science, Grossman L., 2010, Wired, Fowler James H., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P427 Li X, 2012, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, V2, P451 Jha A., 2012, The Guardian, Priem Jason, 2010, Gruzd Anatoliy, 2012, SOCIAL MEDIA FOR ACADEMICS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P21 RIN, 2011, A Research Information Network Report, Bar-Ilan J., 2012, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and the Internet (CoSci12), Dusseldorf, Germany, P183 Tsay MY, 1998, BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V86, P31 Katsnelson Alla, 2010, NATURE, V468, P741 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340322400020 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The quality of Indian medical journals: Then and now Authors: Nagoba, BS; Suryawanshi, NM; Selkar, SP Author Full Names: Nagoba, Basavraj S.; Suryawanshi, Namdev M.; Selkar, Sohan P. Source: NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 26 (5):311-312; SEP-OCT 2013 Language: English Document Type: Letter Addresses: [Nagoba, Basavraj S.; Suryawanshi, Namdev M.] MIMSR Med Coll, Dept Microbiol, Latur, Maharashtra, India. [Selkar, Sohan P.] MIP Coll Physiotherapy, Dept Physiotherapy, Latur, Maharashtra, India. E-mail Addresses: dr_bsnagoba at yahoo.com Cited Reference Count: 6 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ALL INDIA INST MEDICAL SCIENCES, ANSARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI 110 029, INDIA ISSN: 0970-258X Web of Science Categories: Medicine, General & Internal Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine IDS Number: AN1DH Unique ID: WOS:000340322400020 Cited References: [Anonymous], Journals in the 2010 JCR, Nundy S, 1998, NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, V11, P1 [Anonymous], Journals in the 2011 JCR, Reddy KS, 1991, Natl Med J India, V4, P90 Arunachalam S, 1998, NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA5th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 07-10, 1995, RIVER FOREST, ILLINOIS, V11, P27 Gunasekaran Subbiah, 2012, CURRENT SCIENCE, V103, P757 ======================================================================== Search terms matched: BIBLIOMETRICS(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A systematic way of identifying and forecasting technological reverse salients using QFD, bibliometrics, and trend impact analysis: A carbon nanotube biosensor case Authors: Han, K; Shin, J Author Full Names: Han, Kyunam; Shin, Juneseuk Source: TECHNOVATION, 34 (9):559-570; SI 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.009 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Reverse salient, Forecasting, QFD, Bibliometrics, Trend impact analysis, Carbon nanotube biosensor KeyWords Plus: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; SENSORS; DELPHI; COMMERCIALIZATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; INDUSTRIES; CHALLENGES; DIFFUSION Abstract: Experts have more difficulty identifying reverse salients in R&D because of increasing technological complexity and a shortened technology lifecycle. As an alternative, we suggest a new and systematic method of identifying and forecasting reverse salients using QED (quality function deployment), bibliometric analysis, and TIA (trend impact analysis). QED allows users to systematically identify and prioritize reverse salients. An integration of QFD, bibliometric analysis, and TIA makes it possible to specify key performance indicators of reverse salient in order to identify the performance gap between current and market-required performance and to make a probabilistic forecast about when reverse salients will be corrected. Our method will help managers identify a top priority reverse salient, forecast its future, and thus make better R&D decisions with regard to market requirements. A carbon nanotube biosensor technology is used as an example. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Han, Kyunam] Korea Intellectual Property Strategy Inst, Dept Business Consulting, Seoul 135980, South Korea. [Shin, Juneseuk] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Kyonggi Do 440746, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: knhan at kipsi.re.kr; jsshin at skku.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2013R1A1A2009406] Funding Text: This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A2009406). Cited Reference Count: 65 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0166-4972 eISSN: 1879-2383 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Industrial; Management; Operations Research & Management Science Research Areas: Engineering; Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science IDS Number: AN0YN Unique ID: WOS:000340310000007 Cited References: Sub N. P., 2001, Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, V4, Lee Thomas Ming-Hung, 2008, SENSORS, V8, P5535 Bolger Fergus, 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1500 Alencar M. S. M., 2007, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V74, P1661 PORTER AL, 1995, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V49, P237 Bijker W. E., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Mulder K., 2001, Technol. Soc., V23, P265 Dedehayir O., 2009, J. Ind. Eng. Manage., V2, P569 Agami Nedaa, 2010, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V77, P1051 Jolly V. K., 1997, Commercializing New Technologies: Getting from Mind to Market, BYRNE JG, 1993, DESIGNING FOR DIVERSITY, VOLS 1 AND 2Human-Factors-and-Ergomonics-Society 37th Annual Meeting: Designing for Diversity, OCT 11-15, 1993, SEATTLE, WA, P427 Arthur W. B., 2009, The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves, Hughes T. P., 1983, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, P1880 Banuls Victor A., 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1579 Mochizuki A., 2001, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, V14, Burg Brian R., 2011, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, V26, P1561 Murmann Johann Peter, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY, V35, P925 Linton Jonathan D., 2008, INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL, V26, P83 Dedehayir Ozgur, 2008, Journal of technology management & innovation, V3, P55 Saeed Khalid, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN, V32, P559 Jacobs Christopher B., 2010, ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, V662, P105 Van Raan AFJ, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P491 Cheng An-Chin, 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P163 Kerr Clive, 2013, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V80, P1050 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 Endo Morinobu, 2008, CARBON NANOTUBES, V111, P13 Holman M. W., 2008, The Nanotech Report, MOED HF, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P131 Gordon T. J., 2009, Future Research Methodology-Version 3.0, Yang Wenrong, 2010, ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, V49, P2114 Hung SC, 2006, TECHNOVATION, V26, P104 SULLIVAN LP, 1986, QUALITY PROGRESS, V19, P39 SPITALSKY Z, 2010, PROG POLYM SCI, V35, P357 Linstone Harold A., 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1712 Kostoff Ronald N., 2007, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V74, P1733 Dedehayir Ozgur, 2011, TECHNOVATION, V31, P627 Van Raan AFJ, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P133 Vashist Sandeep Kumar, 2011, BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, V29, P169 Landeta Jon, 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V73, P467 SAHAL D, 1981, RESEARCH POLICY, V10, P2 Hogaboam L, 2013, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, MacKenzie D., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, P195 Agami Nedaa, 2009, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V76, P952 Wang Juite, 2010, TECHNOVATION, V30, P601 Kuusi Osmo, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P759 Teichert T., 2008, World Patent Inf, V30, P106 Juanola-Feliu E., 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P193 Takeishi A, 2005, JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V14, P291 McNeil R. D., 2007, Barriers to Nanotechnology Commercialization: Final Report, P1 Hall B., 2001, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 8498, P3 SAHAL D, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P61 Bhat JSA, 2005, TECHNOVATION, V25, P457 Li Chunyu, 2008, COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V68, P1227 Cohen L, 1995, Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You, Carvalho M. M., 2013, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V80, P1418 Wang J., 2004, Electroanalysis, V17, P7 Palchetti I., 2010, Sensors and Microsystems: AISEM 2009 Proceedings, P15 Yanez Mario, 2010, TECHNOVATION, V30, P389 CLARK KB, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P235 Fam D. W. H., 2011, SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, V157, P1 Lo Chih-cheng, 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P168 Kim Wanki, 2010, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V77, P566 Meyer Patrick E., 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P77 Costas Rodrigo, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P193 Meyer MS, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P163 ________________________________ Search terms matched: BIBLIOMETRIC(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Field-normalized bibliometric evaluation of leading research institutions in chemistry in China and India Authors: Prathap, G Author Full Names: Prathap, Gangan Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 107 (2):269-272; JUL 25 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric indicators, chemistry, field-normalization, research institutions ranking Abstract: Chemistry is the biggest area of research in which India publishes and it is the second biggest for China in recent years. Within this broad research area, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is India's biggest single academic research contributor, while the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is China's biggest player. In this communication, we use field-normalized bibliometric indicators from the latest (2013) release of SCImago Institutions Rankings World Reports to show that while the leading institutions from CSIR are showing a declining trend in the quality of research output, their counterparts from CAS are rapidly improving on both quality and quantity terms. Addresses: CSIR, Natl Inst Interdisciplinary Sci & Technol, Thiruvananthapuram 695019, Kerala, India. E-mail Addresses: gp at niist.res.in Cited Reference Count: 3 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AM6YN Unique ID: WOS:000340012000026 Cited References: Nishy P., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P245 Radojicic Zoran, 2012, CURRENT SCIENCE, V103, P158 Schubert A, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P311 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340310000007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A systematic way of identifying and forecasting technological reverse salients using QFD, bibliometrics, and trend impact analysis: A carbon nanotube biosensor case Authors: Han, K; Shin, J Author Full Names: Han, Kyunam; Shin, Juneseuk Source: TECHNOVATION, 34 (9):559-570; SI 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.009 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Reverse salient, Forecasting, QFD, Bibliometrics, Trend impact analysis, Carbon nanotube biosensor KeyWords Plus: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; SENSORS; DELPHI; COMMERCIALIZATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; INDUSTRIES; CHALLENGES; DIFFUSION Abstract: Experts have more difficulty identifying reverse salients in R&D because of increasing technological complexity and a shortened technology lifecycle. As an alternative, we suggest a new and systematic method of identifying and forecasting reverse salients using QED (quality function deployment), bibliometric analysis, and TIA (trend impact analysis). QED allows users to systematically identify and prioritize reverse salients. An integration of QFD, bibliometric analysis, and TIA makes it possible to specify key performance indicators of reverse salient in order to identify the performance gap between current and market-required performance and to make a probabilistic forecast about when reverse salients will be corrected. Our method will help managers identify a top priority reverse salient, forecast its future, and thus make better R&D decisions with regard to market requirements. A carbon nanotube biosensor technology is used as an example. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Han, Kyunam] Korea Intellectual Property Strategy Inst, Dept Business Consulting, Seoul 135980, South Korea. [Shin, Juneseuk] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Kyonggi Do 440746, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: knhan at kipsi.re.kr; jsshin at skku.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2013R1A1A2009406] Funding Text: This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A2009406). Cited Reference Count: 65 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0166-4972 eISSN: 1879-2383 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Industrial; Management; Operations Research & Management Science Research Areas: Engineering; Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science IDS Number: AN0YN Unique ID: WOS:000340310000007 Cited References: Sub N. P., 2001, Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, V4, Lee Thomas Ming-Hung, 2008, SENSORS, V8, P5535 Bolger Fergus, 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1500 Alencar M. S. M., 2007, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V74, P1661 PORTER AL, 1995, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V49, P237 Bijker W. E., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Mulder K., 2001, Technol. Soc., V23, P265 Dedehayir O., 2009, J. Ind. Eng. Manage., V2, P569 Agami Nedaa, 2010, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V77, P1051 Jolly V. K., 1997, Commercializing New Technologies: Getting from Mind to Market, BYRNE JG, 1993, DESIGNING FOR DIVERSITY, VOLS 1 AND 2Human-Factors-and-Ergomonics-Society 37th Annual Meeting: Designing for Diversity, OCT 11-15, 1993, SEATTLE, WA, P427 Arthur W. B., 2009, The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves, Hughes T. P., 1983, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, P1880 Banuls Victor A., 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1579 Mochizuki A., 2001, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, V14, Burg Brian R., 2011, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, V26, P1561 Murmann Johann Peter, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY, V35, P925 Linton Jonathan D., 2008, INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL, V26, P83 Dedehayir Ozgur, 2008, Journal of technology management & innovation, V3, P55 Saeed Khalid, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN, V32, P559 Jacobs Christopher B., 2010, ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, V662, P105 Van Raan AFJ, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P491 Cheng An-Chin, 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P163 Kerr Clive, 2013, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V80, P1050 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 Endo Morinobu, 2008, CARBON NANOTUBES, V111, P13 Holman M. W., 2008, The Nanotech Report, MOED HF, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P131 Gordon T. J., 2009, Future Research Methodology-Version 3.0, Yang Wenrong, 2010, ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, V49, P2114 Hung SC, 2006, TECHNOVATION, V26, P104 SULLIVAN LP, 1986, QUALITY PROGRESS, V19, P39 SPITALSKY Z, 2010, PROG POLYM SCI, V35, P357 Linstone Harold A., 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1712 Kostoff Ronald N., 2007, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V74, P1733 Dedehayir Ozgur, 2011, TECHNOVATION, V31, P627 Van Raan AFJ, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P133 Vashist Sandeep Kumar, 2011, BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, V29, P169 Landeta Jon, 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V73, P467 SAHAL D, 1981, RESEARCH POLICY, V10, P2 Hogaboam L, 2013, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, MacKenzie D., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, P195 Agami Nedaa, 2009, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V76, P952 Wang Juite, 2010, TECHNOVATION, V30, P601 Kuusi Osmo, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P759 Teichert T., 2008, World Patent Inf, V30, P106 Juanola-Feliu E., 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P193 Takeishi A, 2005, JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V14, P291 McNeil R. D., 2007, Barriers to Nanotechnology Commercialization: Final Report, P1 Hall B., 2001, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 8498, P3 SAHAL D, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P61 Bhat JSA, 2005, TECHNOVATION, V25, P457 Li Chunyu, 2008, COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V68, P1227 Cohen L, 1995, Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You, Carvalho M. M., 2013, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V80, P1418 Wang J., 2004, Electroanalysis, V17, P7 Palchetti I., 2010, Sensors and Microsystems: AISEM 2009 Proceedings, P15 Yanez Mario, 2010, TECHNOVATION, V30, P389 CLARK KB, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P235 Fam D. W. H., 2011, SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, V157, P1 Lo Chih-cheng, 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P168 Kim Wanki, 2010, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V77, P566 Meyer Patrick E., 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P77 Costas Rodrigo, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P193 Meyer MS, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P163 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340283500006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Papers Receive More Citations After Rejection Authors: Braatz, RD Author Full Names: Braatz, Richard D. Source: IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 34 (4):22-23; 10.1109/MCS.2014.2320335 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material KeyWords Plus: MANUSCRIPTS Cited Reference Count: 11 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA ISSN: 1066-033X eISSN: 1941-000X Web of Science Categories: Automation & Control Systems Research Areas: Automation & Control Systems IDS Number: AN0OI Unique ID: WOS:000340283500006 Cited References: Jackson Jeffrey L., 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, BANKS M, 2012, PHYS WORLD, V25, P8 Campanario Juan Miguel, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V58, P734 Ball P., 2012, Nature News, Williams R., 2012, Scientist, Calcagno V., 2012, SCIENCE, V338, P1065 Bohannan J., 2012, ScienceInsider, Bornmann Lutz, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P1841 BRAATZ RD, 2012, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG, V32, P6 McDonald R. J., 2009, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, V30, P253 [Anonymous], 2003, Nature, V425, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340012000026 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Field-normalized bibliometric evaluation of leading research institutions in chemistry in China and India Authors: Prathap, G Author Full Names: Prathap, Gangan Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 107 (2):269-272; JUL 25 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric indicators, chemistry, field-normalization, research institutions ranking Abstract: Chemistry is the biggest area of research in which India publishes and it is the second biggest for China in recent years. Within this broad research area, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is India's biggest single academic research contributor, while the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is China's biggest player. In this communication, we use field-normalized bibliometric indicators from the latest (2013) release of SCImago Institutions Rankings World Reports to show that while the leading institutions from CSIR are showing a declining trend in the quality of research output, their counterparts from CAS are rapidly improving on both quality and quantity terms. Addresses: CSIR, Natl Inst Interdisciplinary Sci & Technol, Thiruvananthapuram 695019, Kerala, India. E-mail Addresses: gp at niist.res.in Cited Reference Count: 3 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AM6YN Unique ID: WOS:000340012000026 Cited References: Nishy P., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P245 Radojicic Zoran, 2012, CURRENT SCIENCE, V103, P158 Schubert A, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P311 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340012000002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Are our all research journals scholarly and peer reviewed? Authors: Singh, A Author Full Names: Singh, Anil Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 107 (2):161-161; JUL 25 2014 Language: English Document Type: Letter Addresses: Competit Commiss India, New Delhi 110066, India. E-mail Addresses: dr.anilsingh5 at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AM6YN Unique ID: WOS:000340012000002 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340208100001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Update on IBE: Impact factor, reference citation, editorial board and 2013 papers of the year Authors: Yu, CWF Author Full Names: Yu, Chuck W. F. Source: INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 23 (4):523-526; 10.1177/1420326X14539867 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Addresses: Int Soc Built Environm, Milton Keynes MK7 8HQ, Bucks, England. E-mail Addresses: editorial at ibejournal.co.uk Cited Reference Count: 4 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND ISSN: 1420-326X eISSN: 1423-0070 Web of Science Categories: Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Research Areas: Construction & Building Technology; Engineering; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health IDS Number: AM9NK Unique ID: WOS:000340208100001 Cited References: YU CWF, 2012, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V21, P10 Yu Chuck W. F., 2012, INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, V21, P137 Yu Chuck W. F., 2012, INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, V21, P225 Lee Yeunsook, 2012, INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, V21, P191 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340210900004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Preliminary Study of the Relationship between the h-Index and Excess Citations Authors: Yuan, XY; Hua, WN; Rousseau, R; Ye, FY Author Full Names: Yuan, Xiaoyuan; Hua, Weina; Rousseau, Ronald; Ye, Fred Y. Source: CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, 38 (2):127-144; JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: h-index, h-core, excess citations KeyWords Plus: HIRSCH-INDEX; LOTKAIAN INFORMETRICS; IMPACT FACTOR; TAIL; DISTRIBUTIONS; COUNTRIES; SCALES; MODEL; CORE Abstract: This article presents a study of the average number of excess citations of papers in the h-core, denoted as e(2)/h and the ratio between the e-area and the h-area, denoted as e(2)/h(2). Real-world citation data from different countries are studied. It is found that at the country level, a small set of publications generate a disproportionately large amount of citations. Although different countries have different e(2)/h(2) values in different fields, average e(2)/h(2) values are all above 1. The e(2)/h values vary widely between fields, reflecting the general citation density in these fields. For cumulative data e(2)/h(2) and e(2)/h values each converge quickly. Neither a shifted Zipf nor an exponential model could fit the data. Addresses: [Yuan, Xiaoyuan] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Lib Nanjing Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. [Hua, Weina; Ye, Fred Y.] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. [Rousseau, Ronald] Univ Antwerp, IBW, Inst Educ & Informat Sci, Antwerp, Belgium. [Rousseau, Ronald] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Math, Leuven, Belgium. E-mail Addresses: yuanxy at nju.edu.cn; huawn at nju.edu.cn; ronald.rousseau at uantwerpen.be; yye at nju.edu.cn Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CANADIAN ASSOC INFORMATION SCIENCE, PO BOX 6174, STATION J, OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2A 1T2, CANADA ISSN: 1195-096X Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AM9OM Unique ID: WOS:000340210900004 Cited References: Ye Fred Y., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1208 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Rousseau R., 2006, Science Focus, V1, P23 Egghe Leo, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1637 Ye Fred Y., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P431 SCImago, 2007, SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Egghe Leo, 2010, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V44, P65 Alonso S., 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P273 Egghe Leo, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P295 Egghe Leo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1048 Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 Burrell Quentin L., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P774 Csajbok Edit, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V73, P91 Burrell Quentin L., 2008, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V44, P1794 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Liu Joan Q., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P190 Hobbs Richard, 2009, RESTORATION ECOLOGY, V17, P1 Albarran Pedro, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P40 Liu Yuxian, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P59 Rousseau R., 2013, Modelling Some Structural Indicators in an h-Index Context: A Shifted Zipf and a Decreasing Exponential Model, Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P121 Burrell Quentin L., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P1504 Fanelli Daniele, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P891 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P697 Zhang C. T., 2013, Scientific Reports, V3, P1 Ye Fred Y., 2008, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V2, P288 Liu Yuxian, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P235 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P187 Laherrere J, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V2, P525 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Chen Dar-zen, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P129 Liang Liming, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 112th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 14-17, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, V1, P143 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P625 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000333326200012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Electronic Journals, Prestige, and the Economics of Academic Journal Publishing Authors: Totosy de Zepetnek, S; Jia, J Author Full Names: Totosy de Zepetnek, Steven; Jia, Joshua Source: CLCWEB-COMPARATIVE LITERATURE AND CULTURE, 16 (1):10.7771/1481-4374.2426 MAR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Abstract: In their article "Electronic Journals, Prestige, and the Economics of Academic Journal Publishing" Steven Totosy de Zepetnek and Joshua Jia discuss the current state of the academic journal publishing industry. The current state of the industry is an oligopoly based on a double appropriation model where academics produce work for at no cost only to have publishers earn significant profit margins by selling the work back to academics. Publishers are able to do this given the price inelasticity and weak bargaining power of its main consumer, university libraries. Publishers' ability to increase prices is also supported by what the authors term as the "prestige multiplier effect" and the "prestige crowd-out effect" which means the tendency for libraries to cut small publishers as large publishers raise prices because large publishers are more prestigious. To date, the usage of electronic journals has not changed this general model. Totosy de Zepetnek and Jia argue that in order to progress towards a more equitable model of knowledge management allowing for the dissemination of knowledge globally and against the "colonialism of knowledge" a change in attitude and practices is required not only by publishers, but also by academics. Once perception changes and electronic journals obtain prestige, the publishing of scholarship electronically will replace or will be at least parallel to the prestige of print journals. Addresses: [Totosy de Zepetnek, Steven] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA. [Jia, Joshua] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail Addresses: totosysteven at purdue.edu; joshjia at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 60 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: PURDUE UNIV PRESS, 1207 SOUTH CAMPUS COURTS-E, W LAFAYETTE, IN 47907-1207 USA ISSN: 1481-4374 Article Number: 12 Web of Science Categories: Literature Research Areas: Literature IDS Number: AD5XJ Unique ID: WOS:000333326200012 Cited References: Egan Gabriel, 2013, timeshighereducation.co.uk, Thompson J. B., 2005, Books in the digital age, The transformation of academic and higher education publishing in Britain and the United States, Wodtke Larissa, 2012, Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, V4.2, P1 Suber Peter, 2009, sparc.arl.org, V132, Getz Malcolm, 1997, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V3, Butler Declan, 2013, NATURE, V495, P433 Antelman K, 2004, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V65, P372 Lieb Thom, 2002, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V7, Hynes G. E., 2005, Journal of Education for Business, V81, P73 Rochet Jean-Charles, 2009, The Pricing of Academic Journals: A Two-Sided Market Perspective, Borgman C. L., 2007, Scholarship in the digital age, Willinsky J., 2006, The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, Monbiot George, 2011, theguardian.com, Kirby Paul, 2013, thedisorderofthings.com, White Alexander, 2014, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, Rauch Alan, 2010, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, V42.1, P56 Rochel de Camargo Jr Kenneth, 2012, Revista de Saude Publica, V46.6, Porter Michael E., 2008, Harvard Business Review, P1 Long Matthew P., 2014, Ithaka S+R US Library Survey 2013. sr.ithaka.org, [Anonymous], 1999, CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, Wicht Heather, 2007, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V10, Hoyle Richard, 2013, timeshighereducation.co.uk, Spector Lisa, 2002, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V8, Odlyzko Andrew, 1998, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V4.1, Michalski David, 2013, Open Access Un/Conference: Promote, Impact, Assess, McGuigan Glenn S., 2008, Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, V9, Sanni Shamsudeen Ademola, 2013, SERIALS REVIEW, V39, P250 Bergstrom TC, 2001, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V15, P183 Niu Xi, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P869 Beals M.H., 2013, Journal of Victorian Culture, V18, Suber Peter, 2010, Logos, V21, P1 Beverungen Armin, 2012, ORGANIZATION, V19, P929 King Donald W., 2008, D-Lib Magazine, V14, P11 Beall Jeffrey, 2013, scholarlyoa.com, Deutsche Bank AG, 2005, Company Focus: Global Equity Research Report, P36 Long Thomas, 2014, CELJ: Council of Editors of Learned Journals, Keren Michael, 2009, Economic Analysis & Policy, V39, P89 Stevens Laura, 2013, Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature, V32.1, P7 Hauptman Robert, 2008, Documentation: A History and Critique of Attribution, Commentary, Glosses, Marginalia, Notes, Bibliographies, Works-Cited Lists, and Citation Indexing and Analysis, Suber Peter, 2005, Syllecta Classica, V16, P231 Osborne Robin, 2013, Debating Open Access, P96 Boletta Mariana, 2004, Revista de Politica tiinfei i Scientometrie, V2, P65 Landesman Margaret, 2000, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V6, Mukherjee Bhaskar, 2007, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V10, 2011, Thematic Cluster Journal of Scholarly Publishing, V42.3, P1 Harley D., 2011, Peer review in academic promotion and publishing: Its meaning, locus, and future, Sutton Caroline, 2011, College & Research Libraries News, Bourclieu Pierre, 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Esposito Joseph, 2013, scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org, Varian Hal R., 1998, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V4.1, Totosy de Zepetnek Steven, 2013, Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies, P3 Wineburgh-Freed Maggie, 2007, Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, V4.1, P15 Singer Peter, 2000, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V6.2, Bate Jonathan, 2014, TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, P15 Fitzpatrick Kathleen, 2012, JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, V43, P347 Totosy de Zepetnek Steven, 2010, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, V42.1, P70 Rohe Terry A., 1998, Journal of Electronic Publishing, V3.3, Miller T, 2012, BLOW UP THE HUMANITIES, P1 Totosy de Zepetnek Steven, 2007, Globalization and the Futures of Comparative LiteratureThematic Section The Global South, V1.2, P45 Anderson Chris, 2009, Free: How Today's Smartest Businesses Profit by Giving Something for Nothing, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The Ethics of Evaluative Bibliometrics Authors: Furner, J Author Full Names: Furner, Jonathan Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 85-107; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: INFORMETRICS Addresses: [Furner, Jonathan] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA 91330 USA. [Furner, Jonathan] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Digital Humanities, Los Angeles, CA USA. [Furner, Jonathan] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Informat Evidence, Los Angeles, CA USA. [Furner, Jonathan] Univ Calif Los Angeles, PhD Program Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA USA. [Furner, Jonathan] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Master Lib & Informat Sci Program, Los Angeles, CA USA. [Furner, Jonathan] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Interdept MA Program Moving Image Arch Studies, Los Angeles, CA USA. E-mail Addresses: furner at gseis.ucla.edu Cited Reference Count: 23 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300006 Cited References: Sivertsen G., 1997, Evaluating science and scientists: An East-West dialogue on research evaluation in post-communist Europe, P212 TAGUESUTCLIFFE J, 1992, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V28, P1 Pendlebury David A., 2009, ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, V57, P1 Cozzens S., 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P85 United Nations Evaluation Group, 2005, Norms for evaluation in the UN system, Lamont J., 2007, Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Bar-Ilan Judit, 2008, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V2, P1 Wager E., 2011, Promoting research integrity in a global environment2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, July 22-24, 2010, Singapore, P309 International Statistical Institute, 2010, Declaration on professional ethics, European Science Foundation, 2011, The European code of conduct for research integrity, Rigney D, 2010, The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage, Shafer-Landau Russ, 2010, The Fundamentals of Ethics, Frey B. S, 2011, CREMA Working Paper No. 11, V11, 2007, The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems, Borgman CL, 2002, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V36, P3 Scriven M., 1991, Evaluation thesaurus, Moed H. F., 2007, Science & Public Policy, V34, P575 United Nations Evaluation Group, 2005, Standards for evaluation in the UN system, Narin F., 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, Bornmann L., 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P93 United Nations Evaluation Group, 2008, UNEG ethical guidelines for evaluation, Wager E., 2011, Promoting research integrity in a global environment, P317 Bar-Ilan J, 2010, Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, P2755 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact Preface : Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, VII-VIII; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material; Book Chapter Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300001 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Bibliometric Standards for Evaluating Research Institutes in the Natural Sciences Authors: Bornmann, L; Bowman, BF; Bauer, J; Marx, W; Schier, H; Palzenberger, M Author Full Names: Bornmann, Lutz; Bowman, Benjamin F.; Bauer, Johann; Marx, Werner; Schier, Hermann; Palzenberger, Margit Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 201-223; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION DISTRIBUTIONS; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; SELF-CITATION; IMPACT FACTOR; QUALITY; UNIVERSALITY; INDICATORS; JOURNALS; VALIDITY; LEVEL Addresses: [Bornmann, Lutz] Max Planck Gesell, Div Sci & Innovat Studies Adm Headquarters, Munich, Germany. [Bowman, Benjamin F.] Max Planck Gesell, Biol & Med Sect, Establishing Sci Informat Retrieval Serv, Munich, Germany. [Bauer, Johann] Max Planck Inst Biochem, Informat Retrieval Grp, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany. [Bauer, Johann] Max Planck Gesell, Biol & Med Sect, Munich, Germany. [Marx, Werner; Schier, Hermann] Max Planck Gesell, Inst Chem Phys Tech Sect, Informat Serv, Munich, Germany. [Marx, Werner] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Stuttgart, Germany. [Palzenberger, Margit] Salzburg Univ, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria. E-mail Addresses: Lutz.Bornmann at gv.mpg.de; bowman at biochem.mpg.de; jbauer at biochem.mpg.de; w.marx at fkf.mpg.de; h.schier at fkf.mpg.de; palzenberger at mpdl.mpg.de Cited Reference Count: 63 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300012 Cited References: Tijssen RJW, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V54, P381 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Daniel Hans-Dieter, 2007, Quality Assessment for Higher Education in EuropeSymposium on Quality Assessmentfor Higher Education in Europe, 2006, Pavia, ITALY, P71 Albarran P., 2011, Scientometrics, V88, P385 Meho LI, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P1314 Tijssen R., 2006, Ninth International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Leuven, Belgium, P146 Vinkler P, 2010, EVALUATION OF RESEARCH BY SCIENTOMETRIC INDICATORS, P1 Sheskin D., 2007, Schubert A., 2006, Scientometrics, V67, P263 American Psychological Association, 2009, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, NORIA-net, 2011, Comparing research at Nordic universities using bibliometric indicators: A publication from the NORIA-net ''Bibliometric Indicators for the Nordic Universities.'', Bornmann Lutz, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1664 Feller I., 2003, A toolkit for evaluating public R & D investment: Models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade, Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, Schreiber M., 2012, Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them, Radicchi Filippo, 2011, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V83, Strotmann Andreas, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P194 Jacso Peter, 2010, ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, V34, P175 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V45, P199 Wright M., 2007, Verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge?, Abramo Giovanni, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P132 Aksnes DW, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V56, P235 Debackere K., 2009, Scientometrics, V78, P165 Radicchi Filippo, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P17268 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P2427 Hemlin Sven, 1996, Social Epistemology, V10, P209 Snyder H, 1998, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P431 Boyack KW, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5192 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P587 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P173 Rousseau Ronald, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P416 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, Lariviere V., 2011, Journal of Informetrics, V5, P392 MARTIN BR, 1983, RESEARCH POLICY, V12, P61 Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1370 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Lehmann Sune, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V76, P369 Jann B, 2005, STATA JOURNAL, V5, P92 Abramo Giovanni, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P659 Berghmans T, 2003, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, V14, P715 Seglen P. O., 1992, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, V43, P628 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, V174, P857 StataCorp, 2011, Stata statistical software: release 12, Schreiber M., 2012, Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them, Bornmann L., 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P93 Gagolewski Marek, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P678 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to cybermetrics, Garcia-Perez M. A., 2010, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V61, P2070 Bornmann Lutz, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P27 Wadskog D., 2007, Bibliometric indicators-definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet, Marx Werner, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P433 Marx W., 2006, Using time-dependent citation rates (sales curves) for comparing scientific impacts, Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P89 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P650 Andres A., 2011, Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study, Randic Milan, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P809 Moed HF, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P105 Barbui C, 2006, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, V67, P37 Pendlebury D. A., 2008, Using bibliometrics in evaluating research, Bornmann Lutz, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P407 Jacso Peter, 2009, LIBRARY JOURNAL, V134, P26 Calver Michael C., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P611 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340155800003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Trends in Autism Research: A Systematic Journal Analysis Authors: Graff, HJ; Berkeley, S; Evmenova, AS; Park, KL Author Full Names: Graff, Heidi J.; Berkeley, Sheri; Evmenova, Anya S.; Park, Kristy L. Source: EXCEPTIONALITY, 22 (3):158-172; 10.1080/09362835.2013.865532 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: DSM-5 DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; SINGLE-SUBJECT RESEARCH; SPECIAL-EDUCATION; SPECTRUM DISORDERS; IV-TR; PREVALENCE; CHILDREN; DESIGNS; STRESS Abstract: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a lifelong disability for which prevalence rates continue to increase. Persons with ASD vary widely in both severity of disability and services required. Therefore it is important to identify trends in research and evaluate progress in the field. The current study uses a journal analysis to evaluate research over a 12 year period in three prominent autism focused research journals: Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Findings include identification of trends in research designs, sample characteristics, and interventions. Addresses: [Graff, Heidi J.; Berkeley, Sheri; Evmenova, Anya S.; Park, Kristy L.] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA. E-mail Addresses: sberkele at gmu.edu Cited Reference Count: 50 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 0936-2835 eISSN: 1532-7035 Web of Science Categories: Education, Special Research Areas: Education & Educational Research IDS Number: AM8VI Unique ID: WOS:000340155800003 Cited References: [Anonymous], 2012, Autism Speaks , Turnbull A., 2011, Families, Professionals, and Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes through Partnerships and Trust, Odom SL, 2002, JOURNAL OF EARLY INTERVENTION, V25, P151 Harris S., 2012, Autism Society, Barnett DW, 2004, JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, V38, P66 de la Cruz B., 2006, Focuson Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, V21, P245 Cooper J. O., 1987, Applied behavior analysis , Frazier Thomas W., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, V51, P28 Hammond Diana, 2010, EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, V45, P187 Kokina Anastasia, 2010, JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, V40, P812 Wang Shin-Yi, 2011, RESEARCH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, V5, P562 Siegel Matthew, 2012, JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, V42, P1592 U.S. Department of Education Data Accountability Center, 2012, Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, National Autism Center, 2009, National standards report, Esbensen Anna J., 2009, JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, V39, P1339 Matson Johnny L., 2012, DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, V15, P185 Gage Nicholas A., 2010, BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, V35, P280 Meadan Hedda, 2010, EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, V77, P7 Mastropieri Margo A., 2009, EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, V76, P95 Kearns K. P., 1983, Single-Subject Experimental Designs in Communicative Disorders, Wehman P., 2009, Autism & the Transition to Adulthood: Success Beyond the Classroom, Estes Annette, 2009, AUTISM, V13, P375 Richards S., 1999, Single subject research: Applications in educational and clinical settings, Poling A., 1995, Fundamentals of Behavior Analytic Research, Thomson Reuters, 2012, Journal citation reports, Yell ML, 1997, FOCUS ON EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, V30, P1 Frey T., 2003, Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, V18, P166 Wing Lorna, 2011, RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, V32, P768 Test David W., 2011, FOCUS ON AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, V26, P49 Shattuck PT, 2006, PEDIATRICS, V117, P1028 SCHOPLER E, 1979, JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, V9, P1 2002, Scientific Research in Education, Boutot E. A., 2011, Autism Spectrum Disorders:Foundation,Characteristics,and effective strategies., Kazdin A. E., 2011, Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings, Horner RH, 2005, EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, V71, P165 Posny A., 2011, Raising autism awareness, homeroom: The official blog of the U. S. Department of Education, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012, New data on autism spectrum disorders, Wilson C. Ellie, 2013, JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, V43, P2515 Cederlund Mats, 2008, JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, V38, P72 Worley Julie A., 2012, RESEARCH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, V6, P965 Jordan R, 1997, Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, V1, P9 McPartland James C., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, V51, P368 Kratochwill Thomas R., 2007, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V62, P826 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009, Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, Van Acker R., 1989, Learning Disabilities Focus, V4, P106 Wolff S, 2004, EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, V13, P201 Kratochwill T. R., 2010, What Works Clearinghouse, Gast D. L., 2010, Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences, Newschaffer CJ, 2005, PEDIATRICS, V115, PE277 Levin J. R., 1999, Issues in Education, V5, P177 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The Citation: From Culture to Infrastructure Authors: Wouters, P Author Full Names: Wouters, Paul Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 47-66; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: COUNTS; INDEX; UNIVERSITIES; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; BUSINESS; IMPACT Addresses: [Wouters, Paul] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands. [Wouters, Paul] Leiden Univ, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands. [Wouters, Paul] European Project ACUMEN, Austin, TX USA. E-mail Addresses: p.f.wouters at cwts.leidenuniv.nl Cited Reference Count: 65 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300004 Cited References: 2010, Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation, Pringle James, 2008, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V21, P85 Edwards PN, 2010, VAST MACHINE: COMPUTER MODELS, CLIMATE DATA, AND THE POLITICS OF GLOBAL WARMING, P1 Lamont Michele, 2009, How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment, Leydesdorff L, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS, V44, P169 Glaser J, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS2nd Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informatics/Collaboration in Science and in Technology, SEP 01-04, 2000, BERLIN, GERMANY, V52, P411 KNAW, 2011, Quality indicators for research in the humanities, Groth P., 2010, Information Services & Use, V30, Wouters P, 1999, The citation culture, Phillips M., 2012, League of European Research Universities?, De Angelis Massimo, 2009, HISTORICAL MATERIALISM-RESEARCH IN CRITICAL MARXIST THEORY, V17, P3 Whitley Richard, 2011, MINERVA, V49, P359 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 van Kammen J., 2009, NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, V17, P500 Wouters P, 1999, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 CONFERENCE ON THE HISTORY AND HERITAGE OF SCIENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMSConference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems, OCT 23-25, 1998, PITTSBURGH, PA, P127 Hicks Diana, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P251 Butler L, 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P565 Laudel G., 2006, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, V28, P289 Butler L, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 16-20, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V32, P143 Woodward R., 2012, Informing research choices: Indicators and judgment, Wouters P, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICSProceedings of the Erasmus Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies, MAY 21-24, 1996, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, V38, P39 Weingart P, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P117 Moed H. F., 2007, Science & Public Policy, V34, P575 Wouters Paul, 2012, Users, narcissism and control - tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21stcentury, ARC, 2012, The Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) initiative, 2007, The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems, Glaser J., 2002, Impact of evaluation-based funding on the production of scientific knowledge: What to worry about, and how to find out, Zuckerman H., 1978, Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, Van Noorden Richard, 2010, NATURE, V465, P864 Whitley R, 2000, The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Porter T. M., 1995, Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life, Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Aksnes Dag W., 2009, RESEARCH POLICY, V38, P895 Star SL, 1996, INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, V7, P111 Schimank U, 2005, MINERVA, V43, P361 Leslie L, 1997, Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university, Mcnay I., 1998, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, V2, P19 KNAW, 2010, Quality assessment in the design and engineering disciplines, Hansson J., 2012, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Halsey A. H., 1995, Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic professions in the twentieth century, VanderMeulen BJR, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICSProceedings of the Erasmus Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies, MAY 21-24, 1996, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, V38, P87 Moore W. J., 2002, Productivity effects of research assessment exercises, Priem Jason, 2010, Strathern Marylin, 2000, Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, Clackson T., 2009, ACS Chemical Biology, V4, P311 Hazelkorn E, 2011, RANKINGS AND THE RESHAPING OF HIGHER EDUCATION: THE BATTLE FOR WORLD-CLASS EXCELLENCE, P1 Glaser J., 2010, Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation, P357 HARGENS LL, 1990, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, V19, P205 van Dalen Hendrik P., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1282 Rafols Ismael, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P1262 Stensaker B., 2011, Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power, Ball R, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V66, P561 Klandermans P., 2009, Het sturen van wetenschap: Sociale wetenschappen in bedrijf, Harzing A.-W., 2010, The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis, Whitley R, 1984, The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, 2011, Acuna Daniel E., 2012, NATURE, V489, P201 Woolgar S., 2002, European Association for the Study of Science and Technology Conference, July 31-August 3, 2002, York, UK, Whitley R., 2010, Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation, P3 Georghiou L., 2000, Impact of the Research Assessment Exercise and the future of quality assurance in the light of changes in the research landscape, Sonuga-Barke Edmund J. S., 2012, JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, V53, P915 Burrows Roger, 2012, SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V60, P355 Buela-Casal Gualberto, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P281 Shore Cris, 2008, ANTHROPOLOGICAL THEORY, V8, P278 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300021 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Publishing Perspective on Bibliometrics Authors: Kamalski, J; Plume, A; Amin, M Author Full Names: Kamalski, Judith; Plume, Andrew; Amin, Mayur Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 385-396; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: INDEXES; IMPACT Addresses: [Plume, Andrew] Elsevier, Res & Acad Relat, Scientometr & Market Anal, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Plume, Andrew] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England. [Plume, Andrew] Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Amin, Mayur] Elsevier, Res & Acad Relat, Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E-mail Addresses: J.Kamalski at elsevier.com; a.plume at elsevier.com; m.amin at elsevier.com Cited Reference Count: 28 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300021 Cited References: Glanzel W, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P69 Moed Henk F., 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P929 COUNTER, 2012, Usage-based measures of journal impact and quality, Lozano G. A., 2012, The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers citations in the digital age, Tijssen Robert J. W., 2011, NATURE, V473, P154 Price D. J. de Solla, 1961, Science Since Babylon, Moed Henk F., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P211 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Gonzalez-Pereira Borja, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P379 Moed Henk F., 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P265 Braun Tibor, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P207 Colledge L, 2010, Serials, V23, P215 Mabe M., 2000, Perspectives in Publishing, V1, Garfield Eugene, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, V3, P173 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Moed Henk F., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P367 Kamalski Judith, 2012, CITIES, V29, PS3 Corbyn Z., 2009, Times Higher Education, He Tianwei, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P571 Elsevier, 2011, International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base-2011, Jones Thomas, 2011, WORLD NEUROSURGERY, V76, P36 Reedijk Jan, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P183 Kamalski J., 2010, Research Trends, P19 Price D. J. de Solla, 1963, Little science, big science, Bernal J. D., 1939, The social function of science, Huggett S, 2012, Editor's Update, P36 Plume A., 2011, Research Assessment, Royal Society, 2011, Knowledge, Networks & Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300023 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact : Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 1-466; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Book Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300023 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340093000034 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Physics in Cuba from the Perspective of Bibliometrics Authors: Marx, W; Cardona, M Author Full Names: Marx, Werner; Cardona, Manuel Edited by: Baracca A; Renn J; Wendt H Source: HISTORY OF PHYSICS IN CUBA, 304 423-437; 10.1007/978-94-017-8041-4_33 2014 Book Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter Addresses: [Marx, Werner] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Informat Serv, Stuttgart, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Stuttgart, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Univ Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Univ Konstanz, Constance, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA. E-mail Addresses: w.marx at fkf.mpg.de; M.Cardona at fkf.mpg.de Cited Reference Count: 7 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, PO BOX 17, 3300 AA DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0068-0346 ISBN: 978-94-017-8041-4; 978-94-017-8040-7 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8041-4 Web of Science Categories: History & Philosophy Of Science Research Areas: History & Philosophy of Science IDS Number: BB0CA Unique ID: WOS:000340093000034 Cited References: Ruiz JAA, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P161 Van Noorden R., 2010, Nature, V465, P870 Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Van Noorden Richard, 2010, NATURE, V465, P864 Abbott Alison, 2010, NATURE, V465, P860 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 BOSCH FX, 1995, JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, V87, P796 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: History and Evolution of (Biblio) Metrics Authors: De Bellis, N Author Full Names: De Bellis, Nicola Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 23-44; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION; INDICATORS; DOCUMENTS; SCIENCE Addresses: [De Bellis, Nicola] Med Lib, Modena, Italy. E-mail Addresses: nicola.debellis at unimore.it Cited Reference Count: 52 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300003 Cited References: Cronin B., 1984, The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, Otlet P., 1934, Traite de documentation: Le livre sur le livre, BENSMAN SJ, 1985, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V46, P13 Wouters P., 1999, The citation culture, Van Raan AFJ, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P129 NACKE O, 1979, NACHRICHTEN FUR DOKUMENTATION, V30, P219 Mulchenko B. M., 1971, Measurement of science: Study of the development of science as an information process, Cole F. J., 1917, Science Progress, V11, P578 Bradford S. C., 1934, Engineering, V137, P85 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Borner K., 2010, Atlas of science: Visualizing what we know, MOED HF, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P131 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 Gross P L, 1927, Science (New York, N.Y.), V66, P385 Quetelet A., 1968, A treatise on man and the development of his faculties, Egghe L, 2005, POWER LAWS IN THE INFORMATION PRODUCTION PROCESS: LOTKAIAN INFORMETRICS, P1 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Condorcet J A N de Caritat Marquis de, 1994, Condorcet: Foundations of social choice and political theory, P93 Latour B., 1987, Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society, Baldi S, 1998, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V63, P829 Zipf G. K., 1936, The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology, Glanzel W., 2010, Journal of Informetrics, V4, P313 Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Zuckerman H., 1978, Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, Anderson R. L., 2003, The Cambridge history of philosophy, 1870-1945, P221 Hacking I, 1990, The Taming of Chance, 1986, Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world, Leydesdorff L., 2001, The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications, Merton R. K., 1973, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, P267 Price D. J. de Solla, 1963, Little science, big science, Thelwall M, 2005, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V39, P81 1906, American men of science: A biographical directory, GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Galton Francis, 1869, Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences, Wilson P. W., 1935, SCIENTIFIC MONTHLY, V41, P240 Salsburg D., 2001, The lady tasting tea: How statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth century, Lotka A. J., 1926, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, V16, P317 2012, MODELS OF SCIENCE DYNAMICS: ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN COMPLEXITY THEORY AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, P1 Durkheim E., 1964, The rules of sociological method, Candolle A. de, 1873, Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux sieclesHistory of science and scientists for two centuries, Narin F., 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, STEWART JA, 1983, SOCIAL FORCES, V62, P166 SCHUBERT A, 1986, SCIENTOMETRICS, V9, P281 BROOKES BC, 1979, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V30, P233 Galton F., 1874, English men of science: Their nature and nurture, Bernal J. D., 1967, The social function of science, Garfield E., 1964, The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science, Garfield E., 1983, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, PRITCHAR.A, 1969, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V25, P348 MARTIN BR, 1983, RESEARCH POLICY, V12, P61 Comte A., 1880, A general view of positivism, ======================================================================== Search terms matched: IMPACT FACTOR(1); RESEARCH(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Bibliometric Standards for Evaluating *Research* Institutes in the Natural Sciences Authors: Bornmann, L; Bowman, BF; Bauer, J; Marx, W; Schier, H; Palzenberger, M Author Full Names: Bornmann, Lutz; Bowman, Benjamin F.; Bauer, Johann; Marx, Werner; Schier, Hermann; Palzenberger, Margit Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 201-223; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION DISTRIBUTIONS; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; SELF-CITATION; IMPACT FACTOR; QUALITY; UNIVERSALITY; INDICATORS; JOURNALS; VALIDITY; LEVEL Addresses: [Bornmann, Lutz] Max Planck Gesell, Div Sci & Innovat Studies Adm Headquarters, Munich, Germany. [Bowman, Benjamin F.] Max Planck Gesell, Biol & Med Sect, Establishing Sci Informat Retrieval Serv, Munich, Germany. [Bauer, Johann] Max Planck Inst Biochem, Informat Retrieval Grp, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany. [Bauer, Johann] Max Planck Gesell, Biol & Med Sect, Munich, Germany. [Marx, Werner; Schier, Hermann] Max Planck Gesell, Inst Chem Phys Tech Sect, Informat Serv, Munich, Germany. [Marx, Werner] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Stuttgart, Germany. [Palzenberger, Margit] Salzburg Univ, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria. E-mail Addresses: Lutz.Bornmann at gv.mpg.de; bowman at biochem.mpg.de; jbauer at biochem.mpg.de; w.marx at fkf.mpg.de; h.schier at fkf.mpg.de; palzenberger at mpdl.mpg.de Cited Reference Count: 63 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300012 Cited References: Tijssen RJW, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V54, P381 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Daniel Hans-Dieter, 2007, Quality Assessment for Higher Education in EuropeSymposium on Quality Assessmentfor Higher Education in Europe, 2006, Pavia, ITALY, P71 Albarran P., 2011, Scientometrics, V88, P385 Meho LI, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P1314 Tijssen R., 2006, Ninth International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Leuven, Belgium, P146 Vinkler P, 2010, EVALUATION OF RESEARCH BY SCIENTOMETRIC INDICATORS, P1 Sheskin D., 2007, Schubert A., 2006, Scientometrics, V67, P263 American Psychological Association, 2009, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, NORIA-net, 2011, Comparing research at Nordic universities using bibliometric indicators: A publication from the NORIA-net ''Bibliometric Indicators for the Nordic Universities.'', Bornmann Lutz, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1664 Feller I., 2003, A toolkit for evaluating public R & D investment: Models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade, Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, Schreiber M., 2012, Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them, Radicchi Filippo, 2011, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V83, Strotmann Andreas, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P194 Jacso Peter, 2010, ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, V34, P175 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V45, P199 Wright M., 2007, Verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge?, Abramo Giovanni, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P132 Aksnes DW, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V56, P235 Debackere K., 2009, Scientometrics, V78, P165 Radicchi Filippo, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P17268 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P2427 Hemlin Sven, 1996, Social Epistemology, V10, P209 Snyder H, 1998, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P431 Boyack KW, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5192 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P587 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P173 Rousseau Ronald, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P416 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, Lariviere V., 2011, Journal of Informetrics, V5, P392 MARTIN BR, 1983, RESEARCH POLICY, V12, P61 Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1370 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Lehmann Sune, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V76, P369 Jann B, 2005, STATA JOURNAL, V5, P92 Abramo Giovanni, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P659 Berghmans T, 2003, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, V14, P715 Seglen P. O., 1992, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, V43, P628 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, V174, P857 StataCorp, 2011, Stata statistical software: release 12, Schreiber M., 2012, Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them, Bornmann L., 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P93 Gagolewski Marek, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P678 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to cybermetrics, Garcia-Perez M. A., 2010, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V61, P2070 Bornmann Lutz, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P27 Wadskog D., 2007, Bibliometric indicators-definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet, Marx Werner, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P433 Marx W., 2006, Using time-dependent citation rates (sales curves) for comparing scientific impacts, Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P89 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P650 Andres A., 2011, Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study, Randic Milan, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P809 Moed HF, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P105 Barbui C, 2006, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, V67, P37 Pendlebury D. A., 2008, Using bibliometrics in evaluating research, Bornmann Lutz, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P407 Jacso Peter, 2009, LIBRARY JOURNAL, V134, P26 Calver Michael C., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P611 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300018 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Readership Metrics Authors: Haustein, S Author Full Names: Haustein, Stefanie Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 327-344; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: IMPACT FACTORS; SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; SOCIAL BOOKMARKING; CITATION ANALYSIS; SUBJECT-HEADINGS; USAGE DATA; SCIENCE; INFORMATION; DOWNLOADS; CITEULIKE Addresses: [Haustein, Stefanie] Forschungszentrum Julich, Bibliometr Team, D-52425 Julich, Germany. [Haustein, Stefanie] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Informat Sci, Dusseldorf, Germany. E-mail Addresses: stefanie.haustein at umontreal.ca Cited Reference Count: 70 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300018 Cited References: LANGLOIS DC, 1973, SPECIAL LIBRARIES, V64, P239 Bollen Johan, 2008, Procs of the 8thACM/IEEE-CS Joint conf on digital libraries, P231 Haustein S., 2012, Multidimensional journal evaluation: Analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor, Butkovich NJ, 1996, LIBRARY RESOURCES & TECHNICAL SERVICES, V40, P359 Moed HF, 1998, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V54, P387 Bollen Johan, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P136 Lu Caimei, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P763 Schloegl C, 2004, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V55, P1155 Bar-Ilan J., 2012, ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Workshop, SCANLAN BD, 1987, SERIALS LIBRARIAN, V13, P57 KOHL DF, 1985, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V46, P40 Bar-Ilan J., 2012, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montreal, Canada, V1, P98 Kipp Margaret E. I., 2011, KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, V38, P245 Thelwall Mike, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P429 MACROBERTS MH, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P342 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Neylon Cameron, 2009, PLOS BIOLOGY, V7, Yu Guang, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V73, P321 Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, PRICE D, 1976, INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION, V1, P17 Hemminger B. H., 2010, First Monday, V15, Emrani Ebrahim, 2010, SERIALS REVIEW, V36, P86 Gross P L, 1927, Science (New York, N.Y.), V66, P385 Cronin B, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P1319 Stock Wolfgang G., 2009, CHEMPHYSCHEM, V10, P2193 Vander Wal T., 2005, Folksonomy explanations, Perneger TV, 2004, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V329, P546 Priem Jason, 2010, Research Councils UK, 2011, Types of impact, Reher Sabrina, 2010, ONLINE, V34, P34 Haustein Stefanie, 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2011: THE 13TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 213th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI), JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, P280 Schloegl Christian, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P161 Wan Jin-kun, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 17-20, 2008, Vienna, AUSTRIA, V82, P555 Peters I., 2011, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Science-ACM Web Science Conference, Ginsparg P., 2007, CTWatch Quarterly, V2, Yi Kwan, 2009, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V65, P872 Rousseau R, 2002, LIBRARY TRENDS, V50, P418 Peters I, 2009, FOLKSONOMIES: INDEXING AND RETRIEVAL IN WEB 2.0, P1 Gorraiz J., 2010, LIBER Quarterly, V20, Schloegl Christian, 2006, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P223 Taraborelli D., 2008, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Carry-le-Rouet, France, P99 Haustein Stefanie, 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2011: THE 13TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 213th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI), JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, P999 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Haustein Stefanie, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P446 Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2012, Article level metrics, Wilhite Allen W., 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P542 Rowlands Ian, 2007, ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, V59, P222 Borrego Angel, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V38, P297 Lee Danielle H., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1747 Davis PM, 2004, PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, V4, P379 Jamali Hamid R., 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P653 Nicholas David, 2008, ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, V60, P185 Hammond T., 2005, D-Lib Magazine, V11, Nicholas D., 2005, New journal publishing models: An international survey of senior researchers, Yan Koon-Kiu, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Li Xue Feng, 2011, SPINE, V36, PE1245 Moed H. F., 2002, Scientometrics, V53, P171 Ware M., 2007, Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community-an international study, Ganegan F., 2012, Filtering the research record and farming big data, Duy Joanna, 2006, JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, V32, P512 Liu Xue-li, 2011, SERIALS REVIEW, V37, P157 Hahn KL, 2002, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V63, P215 Franck G, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P53 Tenopir C., 2000, Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers, Lin X., 2006, Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Austin, TX, BUSTION M, 1992, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V53, P537 Schloegl Christian, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 17-20, 2008, Vienna, AUSTRIA, V82, P567 Noll M. G., 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, Winnipeg, Canada, P177 Brody Tim, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P1060 Baker Gayle, 2008, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V21, P48 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300015 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Altmetrics Authors: Priem, J Author Full Names: Priem, Jason Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 263-287; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; IMPACT; WEB; INFORMATION; LIBRARY; COMMUNICATION; MOTIVATIONS; INDICATORS; BEHAVIOR Addresses: [Priem, Jason] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA. [Priem, Jason] ImpactStory, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Cited Reference Count: 104 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300015 Cited References: Sugimoto Cassidy R., 2008, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V30, P273 Gotzsche Peter C., 2010, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V341, Neylon C., 2012, Research assessment to support research impact, CRONIN B, 1994, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V50, P165 Letierce J., 2010, Web Science Conference, Raleigh, NC, Weller K, 2011, Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference (Web-Sci'11), P1 Thelwall M, 2003, Information Research, V8, Shema H., 2011, altmetrics11: Tracking scholarly impact on the social Web (an ACM Web Science Conference 2011 workshop), Koblenz, Germany, Borland J., 2007, Wired, Davis P., 2012, The Scholarly Kitchen, Haustein Stefanie, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P446 Shirky C., 2008, Web 2.0 Expo, New York, Nielsen M., 2009, Michael Nielsen Blog, VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 Procter Rob, 2010, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCESUK e-Science All Hands Meeting, DEC 07-09, 2009, Oxford, ENGLAND, V368, P4039 Taraborelli D., 2008, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems [COOP ' 08], Carry-Le-Rouet, France, Lucas D. V., 2008, A product review of Zotero, MERTON RK, 1988, ISIS, V79, P606 King D., 2004, Nature web focus: Access to the literature, Espeland Wendy Nelson, 2007, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V113, P1 Perneger TV, 2004, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V329, P546 Dunlap J. C., 2009, Journal of Information Systems Education, V20, P129 MacRoberts M. H., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1 Kousha Kayvan, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P2060 Cronin B, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P1319 Almind TC, 1997, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V53, P404 Narin F., 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, Harnad Stevan, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, V79, P147 McNee S. M., 2006, Meeting user information needs in recommender systems, Struijv O., 2010, Researchers of tomorrow annual report, 2009-2010, Marchionini Gary, 2006, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V28, P480 Junco R., 2011, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, V27, P119 Priem Jason, 2010, Schriger David L., 2011, ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, V57, P153 Thelwall M., 2010, Information Research, V15, Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Kiernan V, 2003, SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, V25, P3 Malaga Ross A., 2010, ADVANCES IN COMPUTERS, VOL 78, V78, P1 Ross C., 2011, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V67, P214 Neylon C., 2010, Science in the Open, Tumasjan A, 2010, ICWSM, V10, P178 Shuai X., 2012, arXiv:1202.2461, Ding Y., 2009, D-Lib Magazine, V15, Edelman B. G., 2009, SSRN eLibrary, MARTIN BR, 1983, RESEARCH POLICY, V12, P61 Li Xuemei, 2011, Scientometrics, V91, P461 BROOKS TA, 1986, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V37, P34 Lerman K., 2008, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks, P7 Yan Koon-Kiu, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Groth P., 2010, WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, Raleigh, NC, Asur S., 2010, arXiv: 1003.5699, Ingwersen P, 1998, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V54, P236 Jensen M., 2007, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Harnad S, 2000, CURRENT SCIENCE, V79, P629 Priem J., 2010, Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting, PAVITT K, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P77 Efimova L., 2009, Mathemagenic, Nielsen F., 2007, First Monday, V12, Lund B., 2005, D-Lib Magazine, V11, P1082 Stankovic M., 2010, The Third Social Data on the Web Workshop SDoW2010, collocated with ISWC2010, Shanghai, China, Bar-Ilan J., 2012, arXiv:1205.5611, Bollen J., 2009, PLoS ONE, V4, Pe6022 Wu S., 2009, PLoS Biology, V7, Eisenberg M. B., 2010, First Monday, V15, ZHAO D, 2009, P ACM 2009 INT C SUP, P243 Tinti-Kane H., 2010, Social media in higher education: The survey, Kousha Kayvan, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 24-28, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P501 Schweitzer N. J., 2008, TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, V35, P81 Bernal J. D., 1944, The social function of science, Bollen Johan, 2011, JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, V2, P1 GARFIELD E, 1979, SCIENTOMETRICS, V1, P359 Bar-Ilan J., 2012, altmetrics12: An ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Workshop, Evanston, IL, Howison J., 2011, Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, P513 Vaughan L, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P1075 Falagas Matthew E., 2008, ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, V56, P223 Wang X., 2012, arXiv:1208.1349, Guttenplan D. D., 2010, New York Times, Franck G, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P53 [Anonymous], 2005, Nature Neuroscience, V8, P397 Oppenheim C, 2000, WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD, P405 Bollen Johan, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Priego E., 2012, Guardian Higher Education Network, Priem J., 2011, Metrics 2011 Symposium on Informetric and Scientometric Research, New Orleans, Borgman Christine L., 2002, Annual review of information science and technology, V36, P2 Allen Liz, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Hemminger B. H., 2010, First Monday, V15, Kurtz MJ, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P111 Lewison G, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V54, P179 Trumbo B., 1995, Science and Engineering Ethics, V1, P11 Wets K, 2003, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V16, P249 PRICE DJD, 1966, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V21, P1011 Eysenbach G., 2012, Journal of Medical Internet Research, V13, Smith J. W. T., 2003, ICCC/IFIP Conference on Electronic Publishing-ElPub03-From Information to Knowledge, P2 Cronin B, 2001, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCEConference on Freedom of Information: The Impact of Open Access on Biomedical Science, JUL 06-07, 2000, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, V27, P1 Krugman P., 2012, Paul Krugman Blog, Cheverie Joan F., 2009, JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, V40, P219 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Ni C., 2011, Proceeding of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, P401 BOGERS T, 2008, P 2008 ACM C REC SYS, P287 jasonpriem, 2010, I like the term #articlelevelmetrics, but it fails to imply *diversity* of measures. Lately, I'm liking # altmetrics, GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Priem J., 2012, arXiv: 1203.4745, Piwowar H., 2012, Research Remix, De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to cybermetrics, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300021 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Publishing Perspective on Bibliometrics Authors: Kamalski, J; Plume, A; Amin, M Author Full Names: Kamalski, Judith; Plume, Andrew; Amin, Mayur Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 385-396; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: INDEXES; IMPACT Addresses: [Plume, Andrew] Elsevier, Res & Acad Relat, Scientometr & Market Anal, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Plume, Andrew] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England. [Plume, Andrew] Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Amin, Mayur] Elsevier, Res & Acad Relat, Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E-mail Addresses: J.Kamalski at elsevier.com; a.plume at elsevier.com; m.amin at elsevier.com Cited Reference Count: 28 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300021 Cited References: Glanzel W, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P69 Moed Henk F., 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P929 COUNTER, 2012, Usage-based measures of journal impact and quality, Lozano G. A., 2012, The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers citations in the digital age, Tijssen Robert J. W., 2011, NATURE, V473, P154 Price D. J. de Solla, 1961, Science Since Babylon, Moed Henk F., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P211 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Gonzalez-Pereira Borja, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P379 Moed Henk F., 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P265 Braun Tibor, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P207 Colledge L, 2010, Serials, V23, P215 Mabe M., 2000, Perspectives in Publishing, V1, Garfield Eugene, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, V3, P173 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Moed Henk F., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P367 Kamalski Judith, 2012, CITIES, V29, PS3 Corbyn Z., 2009, Times Higher Education, He Tianwei, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P571 Elsevier, 2011, International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base-2011, Jones Thomas, 2011, WORLD NEUROSURGERY, V76, P36 Reedijk Jan, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P183 Kamalski J., 2010, Research Trends, P19 Price D. J. de Solla, 1963, Little science, big science, Bernal J. D., 1939, The social function of science, Huggett S, 2012, Editor's Update, P36 Plume A., 2011, Research Assessment, Royal Society, 2011, Knowledge, Networks & Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300019 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Evaluating the Work of Judges Authors: Hook, PA Author Full Names: Hook, Peter A. Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 345-364; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: STATE SUPREME COURTS; CITATION INDEXES; JUDICIAL INFLUENCE; NETWORK ANALYSIS; LEGAL PRECEDENT; LAW; JUSTICES; SCIENCE; APPEALS; CLASSIFICATION Addresses: Indiana Univ, Sch Informat & Comp, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA. E-mail Addresses: Pahook at indiana.edu Cited Reference Count: 141 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300019 Cited References: MERRYMAN JH, 1977, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, V50, P381 Epstein L., 2012, The Supreme Court compendium: Data, decisions, and developments, Roy B., 2004, University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, V62, P99 Schubert G., 1962, American Political Science Review, V56, P90 Blackwell K., 2009, Albany Law Review, V72, P673 Riggs R. E., 1988, BYU Journal of Public Law, V2, P15 Smyth R., 1999, Monash University Law Review, V25, P29 Manz WH, 2002, LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, V94, P267 Yung C. R., 2012, Iowa Law Review Bulletin, V97, P41 Acker J. R., 1990, Law & Policy, V12, P1 Hook P. A, 2007, 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, CALDEIRA GA, 1985, AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, V79, P178 Merryman J., 2007, The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America, Battelle John, 2005, The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture, Shapiro FR, 2000, JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIESConference on Interpreting Legal Citations, APR 10, 1999, EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, V29, P409 Choi SJ, 2004, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, V78, P23 Cross F.B., 2008, Emory Law Journal, V57, P1227 Epstein L., 2003, Saint Louis University Law Journal, V47, P783 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, Calabresi S. G., 2005, William and Mary Law Review, V47, P743 Pritchett C. H., 1948, The Roosevelt Court: A study in judicial politics and values 1937-1947, COOPER BD, 1982, LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, V75, P3 Cross F. B., 2006, San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-67, Fowler James H., 2007, POLITICAL ANALYSIS, V15, P324 Ulmer S. S., 1980, Southern Illinois University Law Journal, V5, P245 [Anonymous], 1897, Century edition of the American Digest, Kosma MN, 1998, JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, V27, P333 Hanson FA, 2002, LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, V94, P563 Mott Rodney L., 1936, AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, V30, P295 Coke E., 1628, The first part of the institutes of the laws of England: Or, commentary upon Littleton, Fausten Dietrich, 2007, MELBOURNE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, V31, P733 Wilkins R. G., 2005, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, V32, P909 Von Nessen P. E., 1992, Adelaide Law Review, V14, P181 SPAETH HJ, 1985, WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, V38, P70 McCormick P., 1997, Supreme Court Law Review, V8, P527 Smyth R., 2008, Citations of foreign decisions in Australian state supreme courts over the course of the twentieth century: An empirical analysis, Klein D, 1999, JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, V28, P371 Petherbridge Lee, 2012, Northwestern University Law Review, V106, P995 THURSTONE LL, 1951, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V37, P628 MANFREDI CP, 1990, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, V23, P499 Tiersma P. M., 2010, Parchment, paper, pixels: Law and the technologies of communication, FROST CO, 1979, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V49, P399 DOYLE J, 1992, LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, V84, P229 Landes WM, 1998, JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, V27, P271 Brin S, 1998, COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS7th International World Wide Web Conference, APR 14-18, 1998, BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA, V30, P107 LIPETZ BA, 1965, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V16, P81 CANON BC, 1981, AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, V75, P975 Ho Daniel E., 2010, CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, V98, P813 Dabney L.C., 2008, Legal Reference Services Quarterly, V27, Katz Daniel Martin, 2011, JOURNAL OF LEGAL EDUCATION, V61, P76 Fitzherbert A., 1565, La graunde abridgement: Collect par le judge tresreuerend monsieur Anthony Fitzherbert, dernierment conferre auesq[ue] la copy escript, et per ceo correct, aueques le nombre del fueil, per quel facilement poies trouer les cases cy abrydges en les lyuers dans, nouelment annote, iammais deuaunt imprimee: Auxi vous troues les residuums de lauter liuer places icy in ceo liuer en le fyne de lour apte titles, Topperwien B., 2002, The Oxford companion to the High Court of Australia, P280 Harris P., 1985, Law & Society Review, V19, P449 SCHULTZ WB, 1975, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, V50, P798 Newton B. E., 2012, Drexel Law Review, V4, P399 Pritchett C. Herman, 1941, AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, V35, P890 Caldeira G. A., 1983, Political Behavior, V5, P83 Smyth R., 2002, The Oxford companion to the High Court of Australia, P98 Smyth R., 2007, University of Tasmania Law Review, V26, P34 HARRIS P, 1982, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V4, P201 Hook P. A., 2007, Constitutional Commentary, V24, P221 Cross Frank B., 2012, IOWA LAW REVIEW, V97, P693 Smith T. A., 2007, San Diego Law Review, V44, P309 Smyth R., 2000, University of Queensland Law Journal, V21, P7 Duncan E. B., 1981, First Symposium on Information Retrieval in Educational Technology, Aberdeen, Scotland, Boulet R., 2011, Artificial Intelligence and Law, V19, Gorney Uriel, 1955, HARVARD LAW REVIEW, V68, P1194 Kleinberg J., 1998, Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, San Francisco, Shapiro Fred R., 2012, MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, V110, P1483 Epstein Lee, 2007, JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATIONAnnual Meeting of the Law-and-Society-Association, JUN, 2005, Las Vegas, NV, V23, P303 CALDEIRA GA, 1988, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V10, P29 Cross Frank B., 2010, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, P489 Shapiro Carolyn, 2009, HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL, V60, P477 Martin A. D., 2005, North Carolina Law Review, V83, P1275 Committee on Law Reporting, 1895, Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association, Detroit, SCHUBERT G, 1963, LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS, V28, P100 Liptak A., 2008, New York Times, PA1 Stafford D. K, 2010, Ohio State Law Journal, V71, P457 Marangola R. A., 1998, Albany Law Review, V61, P1625 Wallace D. H, 2009, International Criminal Justice Review, V19, P287 Betz K. W., 1992, Indiana Law Review, V25, P1469 Surrency E. C., 1990, A history of American law publishing, [Anonymous], 1957, Harvard Law Review, V71, P94 Chabot C. K., 2011, Missouri Law Review, V76, P999 Smyth R., 2009, Citing outside the law reports: Citations of secondary authorities on the Australian state supreme courts over the twentieth century, Gordon S. L., 2005, Legal Information ALERT, V24, P1 Black Ryan C., 2013, JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, V10, P325 Hopkin K, 2005, SCIENTIST, V19, P22 Smyth R., 2008, University of Western Australia Law Review, V34, P145 SHAPIRO FR, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P337 Chandler S.J., 2007, Mathematica Journal, V10, Johnson J. C., 2005, Sunbelt XXV, International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, Redondo Beach, CA, Garfield E, 1961, Science citation index, Smyth R., University of Queensland Law Journal, V28, P39 Chandler S. J., 2005, 2005 Wolfram Technology Conference, Champaign, IL, Shapiro FR, 2000, JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIESConference on Interpreting Legal Citations, APR 10, 1999, EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, V29, P397 Smyth R., 2000, Griffith Law Review, V9, P25 Nagal S. S., 1962, Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, V43, P136 Thomson/West, 2011, West's analysis of American law: With key number classifications, Crandley M. J., 2011, Indiana Law Review, V44, P993 MacIntyre J. M., 1966, University of British Columbia Law Review, V2, P478 McCormick P., 2009, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, V47, P83 Zaring David, 2006, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, V3, P297 Bushnell S. I., 1986, University of New Brunswick Law Journal, V35, P157 Spaeth H. J., 2012, The Supreme Court Database, FRIEDMAN LM, 1981, STANFORD LAW REVIEW, V33, P773 Greenhouse Linda, 2005, The New York times on the Web, PA17 Whalen R., 2013, Complex Networks, P169 Committee on Library and Legal Literature, 1895, Seventh Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, White Sulphur Springs, WV, Martin H. C., 1996, North Carolina Law Review, V74, P1851 Hook P. A., 2007, International Workshop and Conference on Network Science 2007, Queens, NY, 2001, Collected papers on legal citation analysis, Merryman John Henry, 1954, STANFORD LAW REVIEW, V6, P613 Aft A. B., 2011, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, V18, P421 Tiersma Peter M., 2007, NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW, V82, P1187 Mathieson D. L., 1963, New Zealand Universities Law Review, V1, P77 Kleinberg JM, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE ACM, V46, P604 Smyth R, 2008, Monash University Law Review, V34, P54 Snyder F, 1999, Montana Law Review, V60, P541 Voeten Erik, 2010, JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, V39, P547 Hossain F., 2006, New York Times, P22 White G. E., 2005, North Carolina Law Review, V83, P1089 Smithey SI, 2001, COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, V34, P1188 Miller N., 2002, Leiden Journal of International Law, V15, P483 Martin A. A., 2002, Political Analysis, V10, P134 Bommarito M. J., 2009, 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law-ICAIL'09, Barcelona, Spain, Cross FB, 2010, Emory Law Rev, V60, P407 Posner Eric A., 2006, STANFORD LAW REVIEW, V59, P131 Lupu Y., 2010, British Journal of Political Science, V42, P413 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 OGDEN P, 1993, LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, V85, P1 Smyth R., 1999, Adelaide Law Review, V21, P51 Von Nessen P. E., 2006, Pepperdine Law Review, V33, P883 Bierman L, 1995, TEMPLE LAW REVIEW, V68, P1403 [Anonymous], 2011, Harvard Law Review, V125, P362 Berring RC, 2000, CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, V88, P1673 Sirovich L, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V100, P7432 Epstein Lee, 2007, NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, V101, P1483 Greenhouse L., 2005, Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun ' s Supreme Court journey, Blumberg D., 1998, Albany Law Review, V61, P1583 Blackstone W., 2001, Blackstone's commentaries on the laws of England in four volumes, ======================================================================== *Record 13 of 14. Search terms matched: TO(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300009 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Network Approach *to* Scholarly Evaluation Authors: West, JD; Vilhena, DA Author Full Names: West, Jevin D.; Vilhena, Daril A. Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 151-165; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: JOURNALS Addresses: [West, Jevin D.] Univ Washington, iSch, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. [Vilhena, Daril A.] Intersect Semant Informat & Network Struct, Orem, UT USA. E-mail Addresses: globe.jevinw at uw.edu; daril at uw.edu Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300009 Cited References: EMC, 2010, IDC white papers: The digital universe decade-Are you ready?, West Jevin D., 2010, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V71, P236 Kalaitzidakis Pantelis, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1346 Liebowitz S. J., 1984, American Economic Association, V22, P77 Palacios-Huerta I, 2004, ECONOMETRICA, V72, P963 Newman MEJ, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Yan K., 2007, Journal of Statistical Mechanics, MacCluer CR, 2000, SIAM REVIEW, V42, P487 PINSKI G, 1976, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V12, P297 Bollen Johan, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P669 Kodrzycki Y. K, 2006, Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, V5, P1 West Jevin, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1800 McKinsey & Company, 2011, Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity, PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Langville A.N., 2006, Google's PageRank and Beyond: the Science of Search Engine Rankings, Page L., 1998, Technical report, Priem J., 2010, Alt-metrics: A manifesto, GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 West Jevin D., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P787 Rosvall Martin, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, BONACICH P, 1972, JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, V2, P113 ======================================================================== Search terms matched: IMPACT FACTOR(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340066900008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Institutional repository impact and value proposition Authors: Buehler, MA Author Full Names: Buehler, Marianne A. Book Author(s): Buehler, MA (Buehler, MA) Book Author Full Names: Buehler, MA Source: DEMYSTIFYING THE INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY FOR SUCCESS, 177-200; 2013 Book Series: Chandos Information Professional Series Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter Author Keywords: altmetrics, bibliometrics, citation impact, cost of an institutional repository, institutional repository value proposition, Journal Impact Factor, Journal Use Factor, open access citation advantage, open access value, predatory impact, process improvement Abstract: Readers and authors who value the benefits of open access scholarship do so for a variety of reasons: it is convenient to access scholarly materials employing a Google search; there is the opportunity of being cited more frequently; and alternative metrics show added value. Traditional impact factors primarily focus on classic bibliometrics, typically not of value to the Humanities, open access journal articles, multiple-authored articles, or authors writing in a non-English language. New impact factors are under development to satisfy the need to exemplify the open access research advantage. Measuring institutional repository value stems from a variety of non-traditional processes, including faculty post-print and student ETD deposits, a process improvement approach, and value-chain/value-stream mapping. Addresses: [Buehler, Marianne A.] Rochester Inst Technol, Publishing & Scholarship Support Ctr, Rochester, NY USA. [Buehler, Marianne A.] Rochester Inst Technol, RIT Digital Media Lib, Rochester, NY USA. Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CHANDOS PUBL, 80 HIGH ST, SAWSTON, CAMBRIDGE CB22 3HJ, ENGLAND ISBN: 978-1-78063-321-3; 978-1-84334-673-9 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BB0BD Unique ID: WOS:000340066900008 ======================================================================== ====================================================== -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tijssen at CWTS.LEIDENUNIV.NL Mon Sep 8 10:53:05 2014 From: Tijssen at CWTS.LEIDENUNIV.NL (Tijssen, R.J.W.) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 14:53:05 +0000 Subject: University-Industry Research Connections 2014 Message-ID: CWTS recently launched its University-Industry Research Connections 2014 UIRC2014 ... * is an online information tool with freely-available data on university-industry research cooperation worldwide. The statistical information is extracted from university-industry co-authored research articles (UICs) published in the Web of Science database in the years 2009-2012. * introduces four UIC performance indicators with data on the same set of 750 major research universities as our Leiden Ranking; it enables internationally comparative studies of university-industry research collaboration across the global landscape of science. * includes information on the geographical distribution of each university's corporate research partners; not only for all sciences in total, but also for various broad fields of science. Visit www.cwts.nl/UIRC2014 for further information, scroll through the Excel data file, check out your university's UIRC profile, or to download the entire dataset. The webpage includes a series of graphs (UIC maps) to show those scientific disciplines in which UICs are more frequent, indicating also some of the main corporate research partners in those domains. For more information, please contact: Robert Tijssen (tijssen-at-cwts.leidenuniv.nl), or Alfredo Yegros (a.yegros-at-cwts.leidenuniv.nl) Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, The Netherlands -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET Tue Sep 9 03:48:29 2014 From: loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET (Loet Leydesdorff) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:48:29 +0200 Subject: Synergy Cycles in the Norwegian Innovation System: The Relation between Synergy and Cycle Values Message-ID: Inga A. Ivanova, ?ivind Strand, and Loet Leydesdorff, Synergy Cycles in the Norwegian Innovation System: The Relation between Synergy and Cycle Values The knowledge base of an economy measured in terms of Triple-Helix relations can be analyzed in terms of mutual information among geographical, sectorial, and size distributions of firms as dimensions of the probabilistic entropy. The resulting synergy values of a TH system provide static snapshots. In this study, we add the time dimension and analyze the synergy dynamics using the Norwegian innovation system as an example. The synergy among the three dimensions can be mapped as a set of partial time series and spectrally analyzed. The results suggest that the synergy at the level of both the country and its 19 counties shows non-chaotic oscillatory behavior and resonates in a set of natural frequencies. That is, synergy surges and drops are non-random and can be analyzed and predicted. There is a proportional dependence between the amplitudes of oscillations and synergy values and an inverse proportional dependency between the oscillation frequencies? relative inputs and synergy values. This analysis of the data informs us that one can expect frequency-related synergy-volatility growth in relation to the synergy value and a shift in the synergy volatility towards the long-term fluctuations with the synergy growth. Preprint available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2492456 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nancy.g.faget.civ at MAIL.MIL Tue Sep 9 11:56:15 2014 From: nancy.g.faget.civ at MAIL.MIL (Faget, Nancy G CIV USARMY ARL (US)) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 15:56:15 +0000 Subject: Elsevier Metrics Development Program (UNCLASSIFIED) Message-ID: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Elsevier's Metrics Development Program - Call for submission - Individuals or research groups conducting primary research or developing software tools and algorithms aimed at capturing different levels of scientific evaluation metrics are welcome to submit a proposal. Visit the program website With the proliferation and increasing availability of primary data, research can be evaluated to a depth and extent previously unknown. This expanding horizon, though exciting, can be challenging to those involved in the process, including evaluators, administrators, researchers and others. To advance research in this area, Elsevier has launched the Metrics Development Program. This program provides collaborative infrastructure and funding for the development of innovative approaches to scientific metrics and indicators. Disciplinary, program, institution or individual level indicators could include: * Bibliometric indicators of research impact * Altmetrics * Emerging research topics indicators * Indicators of regional or disciplinary scientific strengths * Patents or technological indicators * Multidimensional evaluative indicators combining different data types image For more information about submissions and proposals, visit the program website. Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5573 bytes Desc: not available URL: From katy at INDIANA.EDU Tue Sep 9 18:32:59 2014 From: katy at INDIANA.EDU (Katy Borner) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:32:59 -0400 Subject: Faculty Position in Information and Library Science, Indiana University Bloomington Message-ID: *Indiana University*** *School of Informatics and Computing Bloomington*** *Faculty Position in Information and Library Science* The School of Informatics and Computing at Indiana University, Bloomington, invites applications for a position beginning in Fall 2015 in the Department of Information and Library Science (all subareas). This position is open at all levels (assistant, associate, or full professor). Applications from senior leaders are especially encouraged. The Department of Information and Library Science (ILS), formerly the School of Library and Information Science, has a long, successful history, having graduated over 8,000 students since it opened its doors in 1946. In 2013, U.S. News & World Report ranked the Bloomington Information and Library Science program eighth nationally . The School of Informatics and Computing is the first of its kind and among the largest in the country, with unsurpassed breadth. Its mission is to excel and lead in education, research, and outreach spanning and integrating computing and information technologies. In addition to ILS, the School includes the Department of Computer Science and Informatics and has a total of over 85 faculty, 900 graduate students, and 1,100 undergraduate majors on the Bloomington campus. _Faculty research areas_ include bibliometrics; big data; computer-mediated communication; data science; digital libraries; information organization, retrieval, and visualization; science studies; semantic web, social informatics; text mining; web science; and more. Graduate degrees offered in the School include Master's degrees in Bioinformatics, Computer Science, Human Computer Interaction Design, Information Science, Library Science, and Security Informatics, and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science, Informatics, and Information Science. The School is also known for its strong undergraduate programs. Indiana University Bloomington is a major public research university with over 2,000 faculty and over 45,000 students. The beautiful campus hosts 110 research centers and institutes, as well as a wide array of distinguished academic departments and schools. IU is renowned for its high-performance computing and networking facilities, top-ranked music school, and performing and fine arts. Located in the wooded rolling hills of southern Indiana, Bloomington is a culturally thriving college town with a moderate cost of living and the amenities for an active lifestyle. Basic qualifications: Applicants should have a Ph.D. in a relevant area (or for junior level, expected before August 2015) and an established record (senior level) or demonstrable potential for excellence in research and teaching (junior level). Applicants should submit a curriculum vitae, statements of research and teaching, and names of three references (junior level), or six references (senior level) using the University's online system below (preferred): http://indiana.peopleadmin.com/postings/971 or to Faculty Search, SoIC, 919 E 10^th Street, Bloomington, IN 47408. For full consideration, completed applications must be received by December 1st, 2014. Informal and confidential inquiries may be sent to the ILS Chair, Pnina Fichman, (fichman at indiana.edu ), or to any of the members of the search committee: Katy B?rner (katy at indiana.edu ), Susan Herring (herring at indiana.edu ), Howard Rosenbaum (hrosenbau at indiana.edu ). /Indiana University is an equal employment and affirmative action employer and a provider of ADA services. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to age, ethnicity, color, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation or identity, national origin, disability status or protected veteran status./ -- Katy Borner Victor H. Yngve Professor of Information Science Director, CI for Network Science Center, http://cns.iu.edu Curator, Mapping Science exhibit, http://scimaps.org ILS, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Wells Library 021, 1320 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA Phone: (812) 855-3256 Fax: -6166 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From riorma at GMAIL.COM Wed Sep 10 06:15:11 2014 From: riorma at GMAIL.COM (=?UTF-8?Q?Enrique_Ordu=C3=B1a?=) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:15:11 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Message-ID: ?? Dear Colleagues, The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited on July 24, 2014. http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html ?? We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( ?? About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but ?also ? applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, and we want to share it with you all. This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. Now, when empirical studies ( http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists ( http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711 ), ? and? c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html ) ?.? seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than never? However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those related with: a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated ? ( http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt ), b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to replicate stably), c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come and go on the consumer product market ( http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics ). Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with ?data? ?- ? and not mere opinions ? -? , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? ?Best,? Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? ?Polytechnic University of Valencia? ??Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar Universidad de Granada? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Wed Sep 10 14:17:40 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:17:40 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Enrique and Emilio. I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that is relevant to the search query. The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. Case closed. Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left truncation. If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read our working papers at the following URLs: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html ?? Dear Colleagues, The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited on July 24, 2014. http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html ?? We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( ?? About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but ?also ? applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, and we want to share it with you all. This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), ? and? c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) ?.? seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than never? However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those related with: a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated ? (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to replicate stably), c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come and go on the consumer product market (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with ?data? ?- ? and not mere opinions ? -? , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? ?Best,? Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? ?Polytechnic University of Valencia? ??Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar Universidad de Granada? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Thu Sep 11 02:46:03 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:46:03 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: <121b0002e11c4b9c84185fda29612f65@CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> Message-ID: Are you talking about Google Scholar? The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data sets? The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if you try to do it? Are suffering CAPTCHA? Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their approach to our community? On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > Enrique and Emilio. > > I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the > same topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you > the honest truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that > Google Scholar (GS) has a given size. I do not think that it does, > and, if it does, it is meaningless. The real problem is what is the > size of documentary set that is relevant to the search query. > > The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what > can be called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also > operate within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what > is called the probability ranking principle, by which the probability > of relevance exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks > decreases, i.e. below a certain point you are dealing with gibberish > manufactured by the search engine itself. Therefore, there is a need > for left truncation and determination of what can be termed the > x-min. Since we are dealing with the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks > the point where the asymptote or ?tail? on the x-axis for the items > begins. > > We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with > PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the > researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. > In other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an > excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below > that is what the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone > largely manufactured by the search engine itself. This > conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index and Google > Scholar. The relevance of the set is also proven by the fact that the > extreme outliers on the right messing up the tail are usually works on > the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. Case closed. > > Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is > right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are > really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left > truncation. > > If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can > read our working papers at the following URLs: > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 > > I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really > clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. > > Respectfully, > > Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > USA > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Enrique Ordu?a > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the > numbers > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > ? ? > > Dear Colleagues, > > The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, > deposited on July 24, 2014. > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html > > ? ? > > We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge > black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the > document ( > > ? ? > > About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun > to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate > that the number of unique documents (different versions of a document > are excluded) should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). > > Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant > (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that > gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can > be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting > is the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only > forced us to devise various techniques for measuring the size of this > dark object that GS is, but > > ? also ? > > applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, > uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by > Google. In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does > or does not, and we want to share it with you all. > > This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating > the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from > somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for > scientific evaluation. > > Now, when empirical studies > (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > b) are the most used products by scientists > (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), > > ? and? > > c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft > Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) > > ? .? > > seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late > than never? > > However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we > emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific > evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, reliability > and validity of the measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal > limitations are those related with: > > a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated > > ? > > (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), > > b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult > to replicate stably), > > c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that > come and go on the consumer product market > (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). > > Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue > vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal > with ?data? > > ? - ? > > and not mere opinions > > ? -? > > , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their > strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can > only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? > > ? Best,? > > Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? > > ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? > > ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar > > Universidad de Granada? > -- ************************************ Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter @isidroaguillo Rankings Web webometrics.info ************************************ --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE Thu Sep 11 03:12:40 2014 From: lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE (Bornmann, Lutz) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:12:40 +0000 Subject: altmetrics Message-ID: Which kind of papers has higher or lower altmetric counts? A study using article-level metrics from PLOS and F1000Prime Lutz Bornmann Purpose: In scientometrics, altmetrics are seen as an interesting possibility for measuring the broad impact of research. Whereas citation counts allow the measurement of the impact of research on research itself, an important role in the measurement of the impact of research on other parts of society is ascribed to altmetrics. The present study investigates the usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research. Methods: This study is essentially based on a dataset with papers obtained from F1000. This dataset was augmented with altmetrics (such as Twitter counts) which were downloaded from the homepage of PLOS (the Public Library of Science). This study covers a total of 1,082 papers. Findings: The results from regression models indicate that Facebook and Twitter, but not Figshare or Mendeley, can provide indications of papers which are of interest to a broader circle of readers (and not only for the peers in a specialist area), and seem therefore be useful for societal impact measurement. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2863 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE Thu Sep 11 03:20:30 2014 From: lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE (Bornmann, Lutz) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:20:30 +0000 Subject: altmetrics Message-ID: Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics Lutz Bornmann (Submitted on 27 Jun 2014 (v1), last revised 10 Sep 2014 (this version, v2)) Today, it is not clear how the impact of research on other areas of society than science should be measured. While peer review and bibliometrics have become standard methods for measuring the impact of research in science, there is not yet an accepted framework within which to measure societal impact. Alternative metrics (called altmetrics to distinguish them from bibliometrics) are considered an interesting option for assessing the societal impact of research, as they offer new ways to measure (public) engagement with research output. Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications and other scholarly material by using data from social media platforms (e.g. Twitter or Mendeley). This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact. It deals with the definition and classification of altmetrics. Furthermore, their benefits and disadvantages for measuring impact are discussed. Comments: Accepted for publication in the Journal of Informetrics Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7091 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From enorma at UPV.ES Thu Sep 11 05:22:29 2014 From: enorma at UPV.ES (=?UTF-8?Q?Enrique_Ordu=C3=B1a?=) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:22:29 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: <5411452B.1060804@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: Dear Stephen, First, thank you very much for your critical and fruitful feedback, and for these studies you recommend us, that we find extremely interesting. ? ? In fact, ?the work ? expressly devoted to Google Scholar ? is cataloged in our ?Google Scholar Digest Bibliography. It is true that perhaps the word ? ? "contains" referred to Google Scholar is not entirely accurate. We know that Google does not "possess" the documents, it is clear that Google is ?simply? a search engine that serves as a bridge between the documents (wherever they are deposited, universities, repositories, journals, etc.) and end users. In any case, it is true that Google Scholar classifies each record using its own metadata scheme. Therefore, it is a database of bibliographic references, which provide access to the document (sometimes the full text, sometimes a short abstract, sometimes nothing really). A different question is whether it makes sense or not knowing the size ? of this set of references? . And ?at this point I disagree with you. It is not a meaningless issue. Your vision is company-oriented. Obviously Google is a search engine, and ?it ? wants to provide the best possible result for a given query. And what the user also wants is to get the best result. We agree. ?Nonetheless, ? as researchers devoted to bibliometrics and webmetrics, we are interested in a better understanding of the processes ?related to scientific communication. And knowing the size and evolution of Google Scholar is fundamental. Scopus and WoS represent the elite, but sometimes we ?may ? want to know the processes ?that happen outside the elite, and today this world outside the cream is represented by Google Scholar, though of course, it does not cover everything that exists . And moreover, can we be sure that such cream is not identified by Google and provided to users as well?? Thus, of course PageRank (by the way increasingly obsolete) is important for Google and for ?its ? users ? (most of us and increasing)? , but we raised up other questions apart from the commercial use of the product, regardless the opacity, that we denounce in our work, and Isidro Aguillo also comments on in his latest email. ?I look forward to read your ?next working paper about this topic, and thanks again for your good feedback. Sincerely, Enrique On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Isidro F. Aguillo < isidro.aguillo at cchs.csic.es> wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > Are you talking about Google Scholar? > > The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data > sets? > > The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if you > try to do it? > > Are suffering CAPTCHA? > > Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their approach > to our community? > > On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > Enrique and Emilio. > > I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same > topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest > truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) > has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is > meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that > is relevant to the search query. > > > > The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be > called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate > within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called > the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance > exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a > certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search > engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and > determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with > the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or > ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. > > > > We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with > PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the > researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In > other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent > estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what > the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured > by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of > both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also > proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the > tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. > Case closed. > > > > Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is > right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are > really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left > truncation. > > > > If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read > our working papers at the following URLs: > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 > > > > I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really > clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > USA > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [ > mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU ] *On > Behalf Of *Enrique Ordu?a > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the > numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > ? ? > > Dear Colleagues, > > The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited > on July 24, 2014. > > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html > > ? ? > > > > We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black > hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( > > ? ? > > About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to > make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the > number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) > should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). > > > > Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant > (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives > us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be > searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the > methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to > devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that > GS is, but > > ? also ? > > applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, > uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. > In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, > and we want to share it with you all. > > > > This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the > 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in > Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific > evaluation. > > > > Now, when empirical studies ( > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > b) are the most used products by scientists ( > http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711 > ), > > ? and? > > > > c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic > Search is in an unexplained hibernation, > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html > ) > > ? .? > > > > seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than > never? > > > > However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize > that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not > technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the > measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those > related with: > > > > a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated > > ? > > ( > http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt > ), > > b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to > replicate stably), > > c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come > and go on the consumer product market ( > http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics > ). > > > > Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue > vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with > ?data? > > ? - ? > > and not mere opinions > > ? -? > > , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their > strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only > promise...TO BE CONTINUED? > > > > ? Best,? > > > > Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? > > ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? > > > > ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar > > Universidad de Granada? > > > > > > -- > > ************************************ > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > Grupo Scimago > Madrid. SPAIN > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873 > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ > Twitter @isidroaguillo > Rankings Web webometrics.info > ************************************ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! > Antivirus est? activa. > > -- *Enrique Ordu?a-Malea* Personal de investigaci?n. Grupo de Investigaci?n EC3. Instituto de Dise?o y Fabricaci?n (IDF). Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV). Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia. Edificio 1H. Tfo. 96 3879480 (Ext. 79480) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Thu Sep 11 09:40:42 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:40:42 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Enrique, I thought that you had raised an important issue, and therefore I was eager but disappointed to read your paper. I thought that you would do with the GS database what Barabasi and others did with the entire WWW. If you could do this, it would really help to understand much better how search engines operate and why they are successful. Unfortunately you did not, and I was disappointed. The question really is the difference between defined and undefined databases. WoS is the ultimate in a defined or prescribed database with definite and measurable sizes. However, its prescriptions have been denounced as biased, restrictive, and distortive of reality. In medicine sometimes the doctor gives the wrong prescription, and the patient dies. The WWW is by nature undefined and open. Therefore it can only be dealt with by taking proper samples. Being undefined and open allows new perspectives. For example, we found that Krugman was right?working papers are more in the development of economics than journal articles. I don?t think that this would have been possible with WoS, particularly before the Book Citation Index. Now we do not only have working papers but also blogs. I do not think that defined databases can capture their importance, but I may be wrong. In any case we seem to be in agreement on the main points, and we are both in the working paper stage, vetting ideas. Therefore, we both may have a lot to learn from each other and should keep in contact. I would be interested in your critiques and suggestions. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:22 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear Stephen, First, thank you very much for your critical and fruitful feedback, and for these studies you recommend us, that we find extremely interesting. ? ? In fact, ?the work ? expressly devoted to Google Scholar ? is cataloged in our ?Google Scholar Digest Bibliography. It is true that perhaps the word ? ? "contains" referred to Google Scholar is not entirely accurate. We know that Google does not "possess" the documents, it is clear that Google is ?simply? a search engine that serves as a bridge between the documents (wherever they are deposited, universities, repositories, journals, etc.) and end users. In any case, it is true that Google Scholar classifies each record using its own metadata scheme. Therefore, it is a database of bibliographic references, which provide access to the document (sometimes the full text, sometimes a short abstract, sometimes nothing really). A different question is whether it makes sense or not knowing the size ? of this set of references? . And ?at this point I disagree with you. It is not a meaningless issue. Your vision is company-oriented. Obviously Google is a search engine, and ?it ? wants to provide the best possible result for a given query. And what the user also wants is to get the best result. We agree. ?Nonetheless, ? as researchers devoted to bibliometrics and webmetrics, we are interested in a better understanding of the processes ?related to scientific communication. And knowing the size and evolution of Google Scholar is fundamental. Scopus and WoS represent the elite, but sometimes we ?may ? want to know the processes ?that happen outside the elite, and today this world outside the cream is represented by Google Scholar, though of course, it does not cover everything that exists . And moreover, can we be sure that such cream is not identified by Google and provided to users as well?? Thus, of course PageRank (by the way increasingly obsolete) is important for Google and for ?its ? users ? (most of us and increasing)? , but we raised up other questions apart from the commercial use of the product, regardless the opacity, that we denounce in our work, and Isidro Aguillo also comments on in his latest email. ?I look forward to read your ?next working paper about this topic, and thanks again for your good feedback. Sincerely, Enrique On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Isidro F. Aguillo > wrote: Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Are you talking about Google Scholar? The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data sets? The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if you try to do it? Are suffering CAPTCHA? Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their approach to our community? On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: Enrique and Emilio. I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that is relevant to the search query. The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. Case closed. Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left truncation. If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read our working papers at the following URLs: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html ? ? Dear Colleagues, The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited on July 24, 2014. http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html ? ? We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( ? ? About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but ? also ? applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, and we want to share it with you all. This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), ? and? c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) ? .? seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than never? However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those related with: a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated ? (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to replicate stably), c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come and go on the consumer product market (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with ?data? ? - ? and not mere opinions ? -? , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? ? Best,? Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar Universidad de Granada? -- ************************************ Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter @isidroaguillo Rankings Web webometrics.info ************************************ ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -- [http://www.institutoidf.com/images/idf_upv_firma] [http://ec3.ugr.es/iconos/ec3-trans.png] Enrique Ordu?a-Malea Personal de investigaci?n. Grupo de Investigaci?n EC3. Instituto de Dise?o y Fabricaci?n (IDF). Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV). Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia. Edificio 1H. Tfo. 96 3879480 (Ext. 79480) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Thu Sep 11 10:13:38 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:13:38 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: <5411452B.1060804@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: Isidro, Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company with commercial interest and secrets. For example, it is very cautious when it comes to copyright. I really hate it when I find a book chapter of interest to me but cannot download it or copy/paste it. Moreover, with Google Scholar citations it allows you to make the choice whether you want yours public or private. That keeps the door open for Harzing?s Publish-or-Perish program. Google does not want any law suits resulting from making your private data public without your permission. Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes. For example, when it comes to individuals, the main measure appears to be the h-index. For analytical purposes, your h-index has to be above 50 to provide a proper sample. Few people have h-indexes above 50, and I know of none with an h-index above 1000. Google?s database is Google?s private property. It can do with it what it wants. I imagine that?like Thomson Reuters?you could purchase a lot of data from it. However, you may be some sort of Bolshevik, who wants the right to expropriate it. As for the uselessness of Google Scholar, I will quote your compatriots below: ?Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711),? Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Are you talking about Google Scholar? The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data sets? The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if you try to do it? Are suffering CAPTCHA? Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their approach to our community? On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: Enrique and Emilio. I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that is relevant to the search query. The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. Case closed. Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left truncation. If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read our working papers at the following URLs: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html ? ? Dear Colleagues, The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited on July 24, 2014. http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html ? ? We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( ? ? About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but ? also ? applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, and we want to share it with you all. This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), ? and? c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) ? .? seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than never? However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those related with: a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated ? (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to replicate stably), c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come and go on the consumer product market (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with ?data? ? - ? and not mere opinions ? -? , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? ? Best,? Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar Universidad de Granada? -- ************************************ Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter @isidroaguillo Rankings Web webometrics.info ************************************ ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Thu Sep 11 10:34:13 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:34:13 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear Stephen, Thanks for your comments. I understand the private nature of Google, but Mendeley (owned by Elsevier) and other similar biblio/altmetric sources are also commercial backed companies and they are offering good APIs for in-depth, large data analysis. as a matter of curiosity I checked the largest h-index in Google Scholar Citations and it looks to be: Pierre Bourdieu Centre de Sociologie Europ?enne, Coll?ge de France http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=d_lp40IAAAAJ&hl=en Citations 361973 h-index 207 Any better candidates? On 11/09/2014 16:13, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > Isidro, > > Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company with > commercial interest and secrets. For example, it is very cautious > when it comes to copyright. I really hate it when I find a book > chapter of interest to me but cannot download it or copy/paste it. > Moreover, with Google Scholar citations it allows you to make the > choice whether you want yours public or private. That keeps the door > open for Harzing?s Publish-or-Perish program. Google does not want > any law suits resulting from making your private data public without > your permission. > > Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes. For > example, when it comes to individuals, the main measure appears to be > the h-index. For analytical purposes, your h-index has to be above 50 > to provide a proper sample. Few people have h-indexes above 50, and I > know of none with an h-index above 1000. > > Google?s database is Google?s private property. It can do with it > what it wants. I imagine that?like Thomson Reuters?you could purchase > a lot of data from it. However, you may be some sort of Bolshevik, > who wants the right to expropriate it. As for the uselessness of > Google Scholar, I will quote your compatriots below: > > ?Now, when empirical studies > (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > b) are the most used products by scientists > (_http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711) > _,? > > Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? > > Respectfully, > > Stephen J Bensman > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing > the numbers > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > Are you talking about Google Scholar? > > The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large > data sets? > > The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if > you try to do it? > > Are suffering CAPTCHA? > > Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their > approach to our community? > > On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > Enrique and Emilio. > > I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the > same topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell > you the honest truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., > that Google Scholar (GS) has a given size. I do not think that it > does, and, if it does, it is meaningless. The real problem is > what is the size of documentary set that is relevant to the search > query. > > The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within > what can be called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric > laws also operate within this domain. On top of that, PageRank > operates on what is called the probability ranking principle, by > which the probability of relevance exponentially decreases as the > number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a certain point you are > dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search engine itself. > Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and determination > of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with the > Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or > ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. > > We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with > PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the > researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations > distribution. In other words?whether by serendipity or not?the > h-index is an excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS citations > distribution. Below that is what the Germans would call a > ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured by the search > engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the > h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also > proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing > up the tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist > won the prize. Case closed. > > Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it > is right truncation, for every patient has to die before the > results are really known. With the WWW and scientometric > research, it is left truncation. > > If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you > can read our working papers at the following URLs: > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 > > I hope to post another working paper there next week that will > really clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. > > Respectfully, > > Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > USA > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Enrique Ordu?a > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing > the numbers > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > ? ? > > Dear Colleagues, > > The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, > deposited on July 24, 2014. > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html > > ? ? > > We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge > black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of > the document ( > > ? ? > > About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have > begun to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we > estimate that the number of unique documents (different versions > of a document are excluded) should not be less than 160 million > (as of May 2014). > > Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant > (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and > that gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge > that can be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even > more exciting is the methodological challenge of this assumption. > It has not only forced us to devise various techniques for > measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but > > ? also ? > > applying them we have shed light, again, on various > inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the search > interface tools used by Google. In short, we have learned more > about what Google Scholar does or does not, and we want to share > it with you all. > > This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost > celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some > voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of > Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. > > Now, when empirical studies > (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > b) are the most used products by scientists > (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), > > ? and? > > c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft > Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) > > ? .? > > seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late > than never? > > However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we > emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific > evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, > reliability and validity of the measures, records filtering > performance?). Seminal limitations are those related with: > > a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated > > ? > > (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), > > b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases > difficult to replicate stably), > > c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools > that come and go on the consumer product market > (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). > > Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will > continue vigorously in which we already proposed several years > ago: to reveal with ?data? > > ? - ? > > and not mere opinions > > ? -? > > , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time > their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials > published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? > > ? Best,? > > Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? > > ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? > > ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar > > Universidad de Granada? > > > > > -- > > ************************************ > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > Grupo Scimago > Madrid. SPAIN > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873 > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ > Twitter @isidroaguillo > Rankings Web webometrics.info > ************************************ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de > avast! Antivirus est? activa. > -- ************************************ Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter @isidroaguillo Rankings Web webometrics.info ************************************ --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gingras.yves at UQAM.CA Thu Sep 11 11:21:13 2014 From: gingras.yves at UQAM.CA (Yves Gingras) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:21:13 -0400 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: <5411B2E5.8010509@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: Hello Having worked with Bourdieu before is untimely death in 2002, I cannot let pass this opportinity to suggest that it would be nice if in addition to just looking at h-index for the fun of it (which by the way we do not need to know that Bourdieu is among the very few great sociologists of the second half of the 20th century) people read his book: Science of science and reflexivity (Chicago press, 2004). He talks briefly about scientometrics on p. 14, and putting more reflexive sociology into our thinking before counting would be welcome... After ?slow science? why not a new motto for all of us: ?slow bibliometrics: thinking before counting? Best regards Yves Gingras Le 11/09/14 10:34, ??Isidro F. Aguillo?? a ?crit?: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > Dear Stephen, > > Thanks for your comments. I understand the private nature of Google, but > Mendeley (owned by Elsevier) and other similar biblio/altmetric sources are > also commercial backed companies and they are offering good APIs for in-depth, > large data analysis. > > as a matter of curiosity I checked the largest h-index in Google Scholar > Citations and it looks to be: > > > Pierre Bourdieu > > Centre de Sociologie Europ?enne, Coll?ge de France > http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=d_lp40IAAAAJ&hl=en > > > Citations??? 361973 > h-index???????????? 207 > > Any better candidates? > > > On 11/09/2014 16:13, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > >> >> >> >> Isidro, >> >> Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company with commercial >> interest and secrets.? For example, it is very cautious when it comes to >> copyright.? I really hate it when I find a book chapter of interest to me but >> cannot download it or copy/paste it.? Moreover, with Google Scholar citations >> it allows you to make the choice whether you want yours public or private.? >> That keeps the door open for Harzing?s Publish-or-Perish program.? Google >> does not want any law suits resulting from making your private data public >> without your permission. ?? >> >> ? >> >> Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes.? For example, when >> it comes to individuals, the main measure appears to be the h-index.? For >> analytical purposes, your h-index has to be above 50 to provide a proper >> sample.? Few people have h-indexes above 50, and I know of none with an >> h-index above 1000. >> >> ? >> >> Google?s database is Google?s private property.? It can do with it what it >> wants.? I imagine that?like Thomson Reuters?you could purchase a lot of data >> from it.? However, you may be some sort of Bolshevik, who wants the right to >> expropriate it.? ?As for the uselessness of Google Scholar, I will quote your >> compatriots below: >> >> ? >> >> ?Now, when empirical studies >> (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate >> every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives >> >> ? >> >> a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, >> >> b) are the most used products by scientists >> (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-ne >> twork-1.15711) >> > twork-1.15711%29> ,? >> >> ? >> >> Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? >> >> Respectfully, >> >> Stephen J Bensman >> >> LSU Libraries >> >> Lousiana State University >> >> Baton Rouge, LA 70803 >> >> ? >> >> ? >> >> ? >> >> ? >> >> ? >> >> ? >> >> From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >> [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo >> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM >> To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU >> Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the >> numbers >> >> ? >> >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> >> >> Are you talking about Google Scholar? >> >> The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data >> sets? >> >> The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if you >> try to do it? >> >> Are suffering CAPTCHA? >> >> Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their approach >> to our community? ? >> >> On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: >> >>> >>> Enrique and Emilio. >>> >>> I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same >>> topic on which we are doing research here at LSU.? To tell you the? honest >>> truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) >>> has a given size.? I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is >>> meaningless.? The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that >>> is relevant to the search query. >>> >>> ? >>> >>> The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be >>> called the power-law or Lotkaian domain.? Informetric laws also operate >>> within this domain.? On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called the >>> probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance >>> exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a >>> certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search >>> engine itself.? Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and >>> determination of what can be termed the x-min.? Since we are dealing with >>> the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or ?tail? >>> on the x-axis for the items begins. >>> >>> ? >>> >>> We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with PageRank >>> the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the researcher?s h-index >>> and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution.? In other words?whether by >>> serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS >>> citations distribution.? Below that is what the Germans would call a >>> ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured by the search engine >>> itself.? This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index and >>> Google Scholar.? The relevance of the set is also proven by the fact that >>> the extreme outliers on the right messing up the tail are usually works on >>> the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize.? Case closed. >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Every field has its statistical problem.? With medical research it is right >>> truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are really >>> known.? With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left truncation. >>> >>> ? >>> >>> If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read >>> our working papers at the following URLs: >>> >>> ? >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 >>> >>> ? >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 >>> >>> ? >>> >>> I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really clinch >>> the point.? But who knows?? I may be wrong. >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Respectfully, >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. >>> >>> LSU Libraries >>> >>> Lousiana State University >>> >>> Baton Rouge, LA 70803 >>> >>> USA >>> >>> ? >>> >>> ? >>> >>> From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >>> [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM >>> To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU >>> Subject: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the >>> numbers >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >>> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? ? >>> >>> >>> Dear Colleagues, >>> >>> The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited >>> on July 24, 2014. >>> >>> http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scho >>> lar-playing.html >>> >>> >>> >>> ? ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black hole >>> looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( >>> >>> >>> >>> ? ? >>> >>> >>> About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to >>> make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the >>> number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) >>> should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant >>> (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives us >>> key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, >>> found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the methodological >>> challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to devise various >>> techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but >>> >>> >>> >>> ? also ? >>> >>> >>> applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, >>> uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. >>> In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, >>> and we want to share it with you all. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the >>> 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in >>> Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific >>> evaluation. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Now, when empirical studies >>> (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate >>> every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> b) are the most used products by scientists >>> (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-n >>> etwork-1.15711), >>> >>> >>> >>> ? and? >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic >>> Search is in an unexplained hibernation, >>> http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-micro >>> soft-academic-search-dead.html) >>> >>> >>> >>> ? .? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than >>> never? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize >>> that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not >>> technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the >>> measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those >>> related with: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated >>> >>> >>> >>> ? ? >>> >>> >>> (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can >>> -it-be.htmt), >>> >>> b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to >>> replicate stably), >>> >>> c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come >>> and go on the consumer product market >>> (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibli >>> ometrics). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue >>> vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with >>> ?data? >>> >>> >>> >>> ? - ? >>> >>> >>> and not mere opinions >>> >>> >>> >>> ? -? >>> >>> >>> , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their >>> strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only >>> promise...TO BE CONTINUED? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? Best,? >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Universidad de Granada? >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yves Gingras Professeur D?partement d'histoire Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) Chaire de recherche du Canada en histoire et sociologie des sciences Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) UQAM C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville Montr?al, Qu?bec Canada, H3C 3P8 Tel: (514)-987-3000-7053 Fax: (514)-987-7726 http://www.chss.uqam.ca http://www.cirst.uqam.ca http://www.ost.uqam.ca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Thu Sep 11 11:36:48 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:36:48 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: The pages 14-17 are free to read in the Google Books entry of '_Science of science and reflexivity'_ On 11/09/2014 17:21, Yves Gingras wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About > the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Hello > > Having worked with Bourdieu before is untimely death in 2002, I cannot > let pass this opportinity to suggest that it would be nice if in > addition to just looking at h-index for the fun of it (which by the > way we do not need to know that Bourdieu is among the very few great > sociologists of the second half of the 20th century) people read his > book: _Science of science and reflexivity_ (Chicago press, 2004). He > talks briefly about scientometrics on p. 14, and putting more > _reflexive _sociology into our _thinking _before _counting _would be > welcome... > > After ?slow science? why not a new motto for all of us: ?slow > bibliometrics: thinking before counting? > > > Best regards > > Yves Gingras > > > > Le 11/09/14 10:34, ? Isidro F. Aguillo ? > a ?crit : > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > Dear Stephen, > > Thanks for your comments. I understand the private nature of > Google, but Mendeley (owned by Elsevier) and other similar > biblio/altmetric sources are also commercial backed companies and > they are offering good APIs for in-depth, large data analysis. > > as a matter of curiosity I checked the largest h-index in Google > Scholar Citations and it looks to be: > > > Pierre Bourdieu > > Centre de Sociologie Europ?enne, Coll?ge de France > http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=d_lp40IAAAAJ&hl=en > > > > Citations 361973 > h-index 207 > > Any better candidates? > > > On 11/09/2014 16:13, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > > > > > Isidro, > > Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company > with commercial interest and secrets. For example, it is very > cautious when it comes to copyright. I really hate it when I > find a book chapter of interest to me but cannot download it > or copy/paste it. Moreover, with Google Scholar citations it > allows you to make the choice whether you want yours public or > private. That keeps the door open for Harzing?s > Publish-or-Perish program. Google does not want any law suits > resulting from making your private data public without your > permission. > > > > Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes. For > example, when it comes to individuals, the main measure > appears to be the h-index. For analytical purposes, your > h-index has to be above 50 to provide a proper sample. Few > people have h-indexes above 50, and I know of none with an > h-index above 1000. > > > > Google?s database is Google?s private property. It can do > with it what it wants. I imagine that?like Thomson > Reuters?you could purchase a lot of data from it. However, you > may be some sort of Bolshevik, who wants the right to > expropriate it. As for the uselessness of Google Scholar, I > will quote your compatriots below: > > > > ?Now, when empirical studies > (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric > indicators, > > b) are the most used products by scientists > (_http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711) > > > > _,? > > > > Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? > > Respectfully, > > Stephen J Bensman > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. > Aguillo > *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: > playing the numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > > Are you talking about Google Scholar? > > The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract > large data sets? > > The system that blocked the access to it to your whole > organization if you try to do it? > > Are suffering CAPTCHA? > > Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing > their approach to our community? > > On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > > Enrique and Emilio. > > I read your working paper with great interest as it deals > with the same topic on which we are doing research here at > LSU. To tell you the honest truth, I had trouble with > its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) has a > given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, > it is meaningless. The real problem is what is the size > of documentary set that is relevant to the search query. > > > > The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate > within what can be called the power-law or Lotkaian > domain. Informetric laws also operate within this > domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is > called the probability ranking principle, by which the > probability of relevance exponentially decreases as the > number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a certain point > you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search > engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left > truncation and determination of what can be termed the > x-min. Since we are dealing with the Lotkaian domain, the > x-min marks the point where the asymptote or ?tail? on the > x-axis for the items begins. > > > > We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is > that with PageRank the set of relevant documents is > conterminous with the researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? > of his GS citations distribution. In other words?whether > by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent estimate > of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that > is what the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish > zone largely manufactured by the search engine itself. > This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index > and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also > proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right > messing up the tail are usually works on the topics for > which the Nobelist won the prize. Case closed. > > > > Every field has its statistical problem. With medical > research it is right truncation, for every patient has to > die before the results are really known. With the WWW and > scientometric research, it is left truncation. > > > > If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar > works, you can read our working papers at the following URLs: > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 > > > > I hope to post another working paper there next week that > will really clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > USA > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of > *Enrique Ordu?a > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: > playing the numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example > unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > > > > > ? ? > > > Dear Colleagues, > > The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working > paper, deposited on July 24, 2014. > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html > > > > ? ? > > > > > > > > > > We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of > this huge black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). > Anyway, as the title of the document ( > > > > ? ? > > > About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we > have begun to make accounts and using 4 different > empirical methods we estimate that the number of unique > documents (different versions of a document are excluded) > should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). > > > > > > > > > > Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself > significant (especially when compared with other > scientific databases, and that gives us key clues about > the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, > found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is > the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has > not only forced us to devise various techniques for > measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but > > > > ? also ? > > > applying them we have shed light, again, on various > inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the > search interface tools used by Google. In short, we have > learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, > and we want to share it with you all. > > > > > > > > > > This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost > celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing > some voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on > the use of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. > > > > > > > > > > Now, when empirical studies > (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > > > > > > > > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric > indicators, > > > > > b) are the most used products by scientists > (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), > > > > > ? and? > > > > > > > > c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition > (Microsoft Academic Search is in an unexplained > hibernation, > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) > > > > > ? .? > > > > > > > > > > > seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, > better late than never? > > > > > > > > > > However, without wanting to lower the aroused > expectations, we emphasize that the problems of Google > Scholar for scientific evaluation are not technical or > methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the > measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal > limitations are those related with: > > > > > > > > > > a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated > > > > ? > > > (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), > > > b) the transience of the results and measures (in many > cases difficult to replicate stably), > > c) the technological dependence on companies that develop > tools that come and go on the consumer product market > (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). > > > > > > > > > > > Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we > will continue vigorously in which we already proposed > several years ago: to reveal with ?data? > > > > ? - ? > > > and not mere opinions > > > > ? -? > > > , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same > time their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old > serials published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? > > > > > > > > > > > ? Best,? > > > > > > > > > Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? > > > > > ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? > > > > > > > > > ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar > > > > > Universidad de Granada? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yves Gingras > > Professeur > D?partement d'histoire > Centre interuniversitaire de recherche > sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) > Chaire de recherche du Canada en histoire > et sociologie des sciences > Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) > UQAM > C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville > Montr?al, Qu?bec > Canada, H3C 3P8 > > Tel: (514)-987-3000-7053 > Fax: (514)-987-7726 > > http://www.chss.uqam.ca > http://www.cirst.uqam.ca > http://www.ost.uqam.ca -- ************************************ Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter @isidroaguillo Rankings Web webometrics.info ************************************ --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Thu Sep 11 11:41:56 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:41:56 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Isidro and Yves, That is very interesting. How did you find what is the highest h-index in GS citations? Bourdieu died in 2002 before GS, so how did his h-index become public? Like it or not, Google Scholar is the biggest game in town, and Elsevier seems to recognize this. I have attended its Mendeley webinars, and it is here that the presenters advised that the URL to your GS citations be posted on your site and pasted into your CV. Google has so many fish to fry, and I regret that it is not putting more effort into its scholarly and library operations. Google used to have representatives at ALA conventions, and its exhibit was the most interesting. They are not there anymore. It has to be recognized that Google did in digitalizing books in five years what libraries estimated would take a century. They do amaze me, but something better will come along. Stephen J Bensman LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Yves Gingras Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:21 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Hello Having worked with Bourdieu before is untimely death in 2002, I cannot let pass this opportinity to suggest that it would be nice if in addition to just looking at h-index for the fun of it (which by the way we do not need to know that Bourdieu is among the very few great sociologists of the second half of the 20th century) people read his book: Science of science and reflexivity (Chicago press, 2004). He talks briefly about scientometrics on p. 14, and putting more reflexive sociology into our thinking before counting would be welcome... After ?slow science? why not a new motto for all of us: ?slow bibliometrics: thinking before counting? Best regards Yves Gingras Le 11/09/14 10:34, ? Isidro F. Aguillo ? > a ?crit : Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear Stephen, Thanks for your comments. I understand the private nature of Google, but Mendeley (owned by Elsevier) and other similar biblio/altmetric sources are also commercial backed companies and they are offering good APIs for in-depth, large data analysis. as a matter of curiosity I checked the largest h-index in Google Scholar Citations and it looks to be: Pierre Bourdieu Centre de Sociologie Europ?enne, Coll?ge de France http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=d_lp40IAAAAJ&hl=en Citations 361973 h-index 207 Any better candidates? On 11/09/2014 16:13, Stephen J Bensman wrote: Isidro, Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company with commercial interest and secrets. For example, it is very cautious when it comes to copyright. I really hate it when I find a book chapter of interest to me but cannot download it or copy/paste it. Moreover, with Google Scholar citations it allows you to make the choice whether you want yours public or private. That keeps the door open for Harzing?s Publish-or-Perish program. Google does not want any law suits resulting from making your private data public without your permission. Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes. For example, when it comes to individuals, the main measure appears to be the h-index. For analytical purposes, your h-index has to be above 50 to provide a proper sample. Few people have h-indexes above 50, and I know of none with an h-index above 1000. Google?s database is Google?s private property. It can do with it what it wants. I imagine that?like Thomson Reuters?you could purchase a lot of data from it. However, you may be some sort of Bolshevik, who wants the right to expropriate it. As for the uselessness of Google Scholar, I will quote your compatriots below: ?Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711) ,? Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Are you talking about Google Scholar? The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data sets? The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if you try to do it? Are suffering CAPTCHA? Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their approach to our community? On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: Enrique and Emilio. I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that is relevant to the search query. The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. Case closed. Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left truncation. If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read our working papers at the following URLs: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html ? ? Dear Colleagues, The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited on July 24, 2014. http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html ? ? We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( ? ? About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but ? also ? applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, and we want to share it with you all. This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), ? and? c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) ? .? seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than never? However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those related with: a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated ? (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to replicate stably), c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come and go on the consumer product market (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with ?data? ? - ? and not mere opinions ? -? , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? ? Best,? Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar Universidad de Granada? Yves Gingras Professeur D?partement d'histoire Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) Chaire de recherche du Canada en histoire et sociologie des sciences Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) UQAM C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville Montr?al, Qu?bec Canada, H3C 3P8 Tel: (514)-987-3000-7053 Fax: (514)-987-7726 http://www.chss.uqam.ca http://www.cirst.uqam.ca http://www.ost.uqam.ca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM Thu Sep 11 14:20:33 2014 From: william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM (William Gunn) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:20:33 -0700 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Steven, I can assure you that if someone from Elsevier suggested that a researcher put a link to a GS profile in their CV during a Mendeley seminar, they were very much off message. Google Scholar did a great thing by making a comprehensive index of literature and profiles available to anyone, but they seem to have stopped there. The index includes quite a bit of nonsense, which makes its size less impressive and its counts questionable. Furthermore, the lack of API, in contrast to the good API support for their other products, is not accidental. It's a deliberate decision by the GS team which should concern anyone considering institutionalizing their use of GS. I have a lot of respect for the GS team, and they did a great thing going as far as they did to make an index available, I just wish they could have gone one step further. Best, William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 On Sep 11, 2014 8:43 AM, "Stephen J Bensman" wrote: > Isidro and Yves, > > That is very interesting. How did you find what is the highest h-index in > GS citations? Bourdieu died in 2002 before GS, so how did his h-index > become public? > > > > Like it or not, Google Scholar is the biggest game in town, and Elsevier > seems to recognize this. I have attended its Mendeley webinars, and it is > here that the presenters advised that the URL to your GS citations be > posted on your site and pasted into your CV. > > > > Google has so many fish to fry, and I regret that it is not putting more > effort into its scholarly and library operations. Google used to have > representatives at ALA conventions, and its exhibit was the most > interesting. They are not there anymore. It has to be recognized that > Google did in digitalizing books in five years what libraries estimated > would take a century. They do amaze me, but something better will come > along. > > > > > > Stephen J Bensman > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > USA > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto: > SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Yves Gingras > *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:21 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing > the numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > Hello > > Having worked with Bourdieu before is untimely death in 2002, I cannot let > pass this opportinity to suggest that it would be nice if in addition to > just looking at h-index for the fun of it (which by the way we do not need > to know that Bourdieu is among the very few great sociologists of the > second half of the 20th century) people read his book: *Science of > science and reflexivity* (Chicago press, 2004). He talks briefly about > scientometrics on p. 14, and putting more *reflexive *sociology into our *thinking > *before *counting *would be welcome... > > After ?slow science? why not a new motto for all of us: ?slow > bibliometrics: thinking before counting? > > > Best regards > > Yves Gingras > > > > Le 11/09/14 10:34, ? Isidro F. Aguillo ? a > ?crit : > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > Dear Stephen, > > Thanks for your comments. I understand the private nature of Google, but > Mendeley (owned by Elsevier) and other similar biblio/altmetric sources are > also commercial backed companies and they are offering good APIs for > in-depth, large data analysis. > > as a matter of curiosity I checked the largest h-index in Google Scholar > Citations and it looks to be: > > > Pierre Bourdieu > > Centre de Sociologie Europ?enne, Coll?ge de France > http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=d_lp40IAAAAJ&hl=en > > > > Citations 361973 > h-index 207 > > Any better candidates? > > > On 11/09/2014 16:13, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > > > > > > Isidro, > > Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company with > commercial interest and secrets. For example, it is very cautious when it > comes to copyright. I really hate it when I find a book chapter of > interest to me but cannot download it or copy/paste it. Moreover, with > Google Scholar citations it allows you to make the choice whether you want > yours public or private. That keeps the door open for Harzing?s > Publish-or-Perish program. Google does not want any law suits resulting > from making your private data public without your permission. > > > > Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes. For example, > when it comes to individuals, the main measure appears to be the h-index. > For analytical purposes, your h-index has to be above 50 to provide a > proper sample. Few people have h-indexes above 50, and I know of none with > an h-index above 1000. > > > > Google?s database is Google?s private property. It can do with it what it > wants. I imagine that?like Thomson Reuters?you could purchase a lot of > data from it. However, you may be some sort of Bolshevik, who wants the > right to expropriate it. As for the uselessness of Google Scholar, I will > quote your compatriots below: > > > > ?Now, when empirical studies ( > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > b) are the most used products by scientists (*http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711) > > > > *,? > > > > Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? > > Respectfully, > > Stephen J Bensman > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [ > mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On > Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing > the numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > Are you talking about Google Scholar? > > The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data > sets? > > The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if > you try to do it? > > Are suffering CAPTCHA? > > Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their > approach to our community? > > On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > > > Enrique and Emilio. > > I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same > topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest > truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) > has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is > meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that > is relevant to the search query. > > > > The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be > called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate > within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called > the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance > exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a > certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search > engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and > determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with > the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or > ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. > > > > We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with > PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the > researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In > other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent > estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what > the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured > by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of > both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also > proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the > tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. > Case closed. > > > > Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is > right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are > really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left > truncation. > > > > If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read > our working papers at the following URLs: > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 > > > > I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really > clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > USA > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [ > mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On > Behalf Of *Enrique Ordu?a > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the > numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > > > > ? ? > > > Dear Colleagues, > > The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, > deposited on July 24, 2014. > > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html > > > > ? ? > > > > > > > > > > We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black > hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( > > > > ? ? > > > About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to > make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the > number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) > should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). > > > > > > > > > > Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant > (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives > us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be > searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the > methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to > devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that > GS is, but > > > > ? also ? > > > applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, > uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. > In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, > and we want to share it with you all. > > > > > > > > > > This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the > 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in > Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific > evaluation. > > > > > > > > > > Now, when empirical studies ( > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > > > > > > > > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > > > > b) are the most used products by scientists ( > http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), > > > > ? and? > > > > > > > > c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic > Search is in an unexplained hibernation, > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) > > > > ? .? > > > > > > > > > > > seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than > never? > > > > > > > > > > However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize > that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not > technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the > measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those > related with: > > > > > > > > > > a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated > > > > ? > > > ( > http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), > > b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to > replicate stably), > > c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come > and go on the consumer product market ( > http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). > > > > > > > > > > Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue > vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with > ?data? > > > > ? - ? > > > and not mere opinions > > > > ? -? > > > , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their > strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only > promise...TO BE CONTINUED? > > > > > > > > > > > ? Best,? > > > > > > > > > Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? > > > > > ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? > > > > > > > > > ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar > > > > > Universidad de Granada? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yves Gingras > > Professeur > D?partement d'histoire > Centre interuniversitaire de recherche > sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) > Chaire de recherche du Canada en histoire > et sociologie des sciences > Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) > UQAM > C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville > Montr?al, Qu?bec > Canada, H3C 3P8 > > Tel: (514)-987-3000-7053 > Fax: (514)-987-7726 > > http://www.chss.uqam.ca > http://www.cirst.uqam.ca > http://www.ost.uqam.ca > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Thu Sep 11 15:50:41 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:50:41 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: William, You may be right. It may not have been a Mendeley Webinar, but it was an Elsevier Webinar. If I now remember correctly, it was an Elsevier Webinar how librarians can help their faculty achieve greater recognition, and the librarian was Dutch. There was another Webinar on this same topic, and there was a Brit librarian, who made the same recommendation. It has become a common recommendation, and elements of the LSU administration are also starting to recommend this. The LSU Libraries administration has, and that is why I made mine public, even though I swore not to. It is an easy way for the administration to keep tabs on the faculty. There is a lot of discontent with Google, and perhaps they will take it further. But they are facing a major problem that is faced by all databases. The Web has no authority structure, and it may be impossible to rate journals, etc., with hyperlinks until one is constructed, if one can be constructed. However, I do find the Google attempts to do this quite interesting, because you began to see the importance of repositories and other methods of dissemination. Respectfully, Steve B. From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of William Gunn Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:21 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Steven, I can assure you that if someone from Elsevier suggested that a researcher put a link to a GS profile in their CV during a Mendeley seminar, they were very much off message. Google Scholar did a great thing by making a comprehensive index of literature and profiles available to anyone, but they seem to have stopped there. The index includes quite a bit of nonsense, which makes its size less impressive and its counts questionable. Furthermore, the lack of API, in contrast to the good API support for their other products, is not accidental. It's a deliberate decision by the GS team which should concern anyone considering institutionalizing their use of GS. I have a lot of respect for the GS team, and they did a great thing going as far as they did to make an index available, I just wish they could have gone one step further. Best, William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 On Sep 11, 2014 8:43 AM, "Stephen J Bensman" > wrote: Isidro and Yves, That is very interesting. How did you find what is the highest h-index in GS citations? Bourdieu died in 2002 before GS, so how did his h-index become public? Like it or not, Google Scholar is the biggest game in town, and Elsevier seems to recognize this. I have attended its Mendeley webinars, and it is here that the presenters advised that the URL to your GS citations be posted on your site and pasted into your CV. Google has so many fish to fry, and I regret that it is not putting more effort into its scholarly and library operations. Google used to have representatives at ALA conventions, and its exhibit was the most interesting. They are not there anymore. It has to be recognized that Google did in digitalizing books in five years what libraries estimated would take a century. They do amaze me, but something better will come along. Stephen J Bensman LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Yves Gingras Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:21 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Hello Having worked with Bourdieu before is untimely death in 2002, I cannot let pass this opportinity to suggest that it would be nice if in addition to just looking at h-index for the fun of it (which by the way we do not need to know that Bourdieu is among the very few great sociologists of the second half of the 20th century) people read his book: Science of science and reflexivity (Chicago press, 2004). He talks briefly about scientometrics on p. 14, and putting more reflexive sociology into our thinking before counting would be welcome... After ?slow science? why not a new motto for all of us: ?slow bibliometrics: thinking before counting? Best regards Yves Gingras Le 11/09/14 10:34, ? Isidro F. Aguillo ? > a ?crit : Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear Stephen, Thanks for your comments. I understand the private nature of Google, but Mendeley (owned by Elsevier) and other similar biblio/altmetric sources are also commercial backed companies and they are offering good APIs for in-depth, large data analysis. as a matter of curiosity I checked the largest h-index in Google Scholar Citations and it looks to be: Pierre Bourdieu Centre de Sociologie Europ?enne, Coll?ge de France http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=d_lp40IAAAAJ&hl=en Citations 361973 h-index 207 Any better candidates? On 11/09/2014 16:13, Stephen J Bensman wrote: Isidro, Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company with commercial interest and secrets. For example, it is very cautious when it comes to copyright. I really hate it when I find a book chapter of interest to me but cannot download it or copy/paste it. Moreover, with Google Scholar citations it allows you to make the choice whether you want yours public or private. That keeps the door open for Harzing?s Publish-or-Perish program. Google does not want any law suits resulting from making your private data public without your permission. Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes. For example, when it comes to individuals, the main measure appears to be the h-index. For analytical purposes, your h-index has to be above 50 to provide a proper sample. Few people have h-indexes above 50, and I know of none with an h-index above 1000. Google?s database is Google?s private property. It can do with it what it wants. I imagine that?like Thomson Reuters?you could purchase a lot of data from it. However, you may be some sort of Bolshevik, who wants the right to expropriate it. As for the uselessness of Google Scholar, I will quote your compatriots below: ?Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711) ,? Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Are you talking about Google Scholar? The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data sets? The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if you try to do it? Are suffering CAPTCHA? Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their approach to our community? On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: Enrique and Emilio. I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that is relevant to the search query. The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. Case closed. Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left truncation. If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read our working papers at the following URLs: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html ? ? Dear Colleagues, The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, deposited on July 24, 2014. http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html ? ? We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( ? ? About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that GS is, but ? also ? applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, and we want to share it with you all. This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation. Now, when empirical studies (http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, b) are the most used products by scientists (http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), ? and? c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic Search is in an unexplained hibernation, http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) ? .? seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than never? However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those related with: a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated ? (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to replicate stably), c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come and go on the consumer product market (http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with ?data? ? - ? and not mere opinions ? -? , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only promise...TO BE CONTINUED? ? Best,? Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar Universidad de Granada? Yves Gingras Professeur D?partement d'histoire Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) Chaire de recherche du Canada en histoire et sociologie des sciences Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) UQAM C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville Montr?al, Qu?bec Canada, H3C 3P8 Tel: (514)-987-3000-7053 Fax: (514)-987-7726 http://www.chss.uqam.ca http://www.cirst.uqam.ca http://www.ost.uqam.ca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM Thu Sep 11 16:56:21 2014 From: william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM (William Gunn) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:56:21 -0700 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: <6c87fab1d4754a38b25505db0dc4d64f@CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > you began to see the importance of repositories and other methods of > dissemination. Indeed you do. This is where I think #altmetrics shows promise. Best, -- William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Thu Sep 11 18:07:51 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:07:51 +0000 Subject: Papers of possible interest to readers of the SIG-Metrics List (September 11, 2014) Message-ID: *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis Authors: Ding, Y; Zhang, G; Chambers, T; Song, M; Wang, XL; Zhai, CX Author Full Names: Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy; Song, Min; Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1820-1833; 10.1002/asi.23256 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliographic citations, citation analysis KeyWords Plus: CONCEPT SYMBOLS; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; SCIENCE; RETRIEVAL; STATEMENTS; REFERENCES; SOCIOLOGY; RELEVANCE; NETWORKS Abstract: Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery. Addresses: [Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy] Indiana Univ, Dept Informat & Lib Sci, Sch Informat & Comp, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA. [Song, Min] Yonsei Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Coll Liberal Arts, Seoul 120749, South Korea. [Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang] Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Coll Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA. E-mail Addresses: dingying at indiana.edu; guozhang at indiana.edu; tisch at indiana.edu; min.song at yonsei.ac.kr; xwang95 at illinois.edu; czhai at illinois.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2009-361-A00027] Funding Text: Min Song was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2009-361-A00027). Cited Reference Count: 88 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500006 Cited References: Qazvinian V., 2008, COLING '08 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, V1, P689 Dietz L., 2007, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '07, P233 BROOKS TA, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P223 Lipetz B.-A., 1965, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V16, P81 Teufel S., 2006, 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, sigDAIL '09, Proceedings, P80 Ramakrishnan C., 2012, Source Code for Biology and Medicine, V7, P1 Meij E., 2007, RIAO '07 Large Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video, and Sound) Proceedings, P665 Athar A., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Student Session, ACL-HLT, P81 GILBERT GN, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P113 HERLACH G, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P308 Zhang Guo, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P1490 Byrnes J. E., 2013, PeerJPrePrints No. e11v1., CHUBIN DE, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P423 Small H., 1982, V3, P287 SPIEGELROSING I, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P97 SNIZEK WE, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V20, P25 Siddharthan A., 2007, NAACL HLT 2007 Proceedings, P316 Qazvinian V., 2010, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P555 Garzone M. A., 1997, Automated classification of citations using linguistic semantic grammars, Tang Jie, 2009, ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS13th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge and Data Mining, APR 27-30, 2009, Bangkok, THAILAND, V5476, P572 Borgman C. L., 1990, Scholarly communications and bibliometrics, Teufel S, 2002, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, V28, P409 Hjorland B, 2001, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V35, P249 Chang J., 2009, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), V5, P81 Jenssen TK, 2001, NATURE GENETICS, V28, P21 Dong C., 2011, 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2011, P623 Mons Barend, 2011, NATURE GENETICS, V43, P281 REESPOTTER LK, 1989, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V25, P677 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Nanba H., 1999, Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI '99, P926 Nallapati R. M., 2008, 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '08, P542 White Marilyn Domas, 2006, LIBRARY TRENDS, V55, P22 Abu-Jbara A., 2011, 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P500 CANO V, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P284 He Q., 2010, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, P421 Pham SB, 2003, AI 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DEC 03-05, 2003, PERTH, AUSTRALIA, V2903, P759 Garfield E., 1974, Essays of an information scientist, V2, P1974 Arnold Andrew, 2009, WIRELESS ALGORITHMS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS4th International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, AUG 16-18, 2009, Boston, MA, V5682, P541 Ding Y., 2013, PLoS ONE, V8, P1 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 Teufel S., 2000, Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text, Schlitt T, 2003, GENOME RESEARCH, V13, P2568 Mohammad S., 2009, Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P584 Stansbury MC, 2002, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V24, P157 OCONNOR J, 1982, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V18, P125 Elkiss Aaron, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P51 FROST CO, 1979, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V49, P399 Becher T., 1989, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectural enqiry and the culture of disciplines, Liu Y., 2009, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '09, P665 Schneider JW, 2004, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V60, P524 Glenisson P, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1548 Ding Ying, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P583 Voos H., 1976, Journal of Academic Librarianship, V1, P19 MCCAIN KW, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V17, P127 SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Nanba H., 2004, LREC: 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Small Henry, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P373 Ziman J. M., 1968, Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science, PERITZ BC, 1983, SCIENTOMETRICS, V5, P303 Maricic S, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P530 Schneider Jesper W., 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P573 Fujii A., 2007, Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '07, P793 VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 MERTON RK, 1957, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V22, P635 Mei Q., 2008, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) with the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT) of the North American Chapter of the ACL, P816 White MD, 2001, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V37, P721 BONZI S, 1982, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V33, P208 Qazvinian V., 2008, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, V2, Suppe F, 1998, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, V65, P381 Huang W., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'12, P1910 Kupiec J., 1995, Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '95, P68 Hodges T. L., 1972, Citation indexing: Its potential for bibliographical control, Glaser BG, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Kataria S., 2011, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Volume Three, IJCAI '11, P2274 Nanba H., 2000, Advances in Classification Research Online, V11, P117 Bradshaw S, 2003, RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, AUG 17-22, 2003, TRONDHEIM, NORWAY, V2769, P499 Ritchie A., 2008, 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Proceedings, P213 Cronin B., 2005, The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards, Marsh EE, 2003, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V59, P647 Angrosh M. A., 2010, Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL'10, P293 He Q., 2011, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '11, P755 CRONIN B, 1981, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V37, P16 Cronin B., 1984, Citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, OPPENHEIM C, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P225 Ritchie A., 2006, Workshop on How Can Computational Linguistics Improve Information Retrieval? CLIIR '06 Proceedings, P25 Garfield E., 1964, Statistical association methods for merchanized documentation. Symposium Proceedings Washington 1964, P189 Pettigrew KE, 2001, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V52, P62 =================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500013 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Are all literature citations equally important? Automatic citation strength estimation and its applications Authors: Wan, XJ; Liu, F Author Full Names: Wan, Xiaojun; Liu, Fang Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1929-1938; 10.1002/asi.23083 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: citation analysis KeyWords Plus: COCITATION Abstract: Literature citation analysis plays a very important role in bibliometrics and scientometrics, such as the Science Citation Index (SCI) impact factor, h-index. Existing citation analysis methods assume that all citations in a paper are equally important, and they simply count the number of citations. Here we argue that the citations in a paper are not equally important and some citations are more important than the others. We use a strength value to assess the importance of each citation and propose to use the regression method with a few useful features for automatically estimating the strength value of each citation. Evaluation results on a manually labeled data set in the computer science field show that the estimated values can achieve good correlation with human-labeled values. We further apply the estimated citation strength values for evaluating paper influence and author influence, and the preliminary evaluation results demonstrate the usefulness of the citation strength values. Addresses: [Wan, Xiaojun] Peking Univ, Inst Comp Sci & Technol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. [Wan, Xiaojun] Peking Univ, MOE Key Lab Computat Linguist, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. [Liu, Fang] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Technol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: wanxiaojun at pku.edu.cn; liuf at mail.bnu.edu.cn Funding Acknowledgement: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61170166]; National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA011101] Funding Text: We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We also thank Xiaojiang Huang and Xinjie Zhou for labeling the data and thank YingBo Zhu for developing the labeling tool. The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; grant 61170166) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program; grant 2012AA011101). Cited Reference Count: 36 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500013 Cited References: Jiang X., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P714 Tong T., 2009, System Sciences, 2009. HICSS'09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on, van Eck Nees Jan, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P1653 Radoulov R., 2008, Exploring Automatic Citation Classification, Ritchie A., 2008, Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P213 Qazvinian V., 2008, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, V1, P689 Qazvinian V., 2010, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P555 Abu-Jbara A., 2011, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, V1, P500 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics, Cortez Eli, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH ACM/IEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES7th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JUN 18-23, 2007, Vancouver, CANADA, P215 Page L., 1998, Technical Report, Eto Masaki, 2007, LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, P49 Sugiyama K., 2010, Information Retrieval & Knowledge Management (CAMP), 2010 International Conference on, P67 Vapnik V. N., 1999, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Statistics for Engineering and Information Science, SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Egghe L., 1990, Abu-Jbara A., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, P80 Piao S., 2007, International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS), P366 Councill Isaac G., 2008, SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, LREC 20086th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), MAY 28-30, 2008, Marrakech, MOROCCO, P661 Persson Olle, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P415 Mohammad S., 2009, Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P584 Athar A., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, P597 Siddharthan A., 2007, Proceedings of NAACL/HLT-07, P316 Dong C., 2011, Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on natural language processing (IJCNLP2011), P623 Radev D. R., 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, P54 He Q., 2010, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, P421 Pham SB, 2003, AI 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DEC 03-05, 2003, PERTH, AUSTRALIA, V2903, P759 Peng F., 2004, Accurate information extraction from research papers using conditional random fields, VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 Aljaber Bader, 2010, INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, V13, P101 Pollman T., 2000, ALWD Citation Manual: A Professional System of Citation, KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Nassiri Isar, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P91 Chang Chih-Chung, 2011, ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, V2, Nanba H., 2011, Advances in Classification Research Online, V11, P117 Teufel S., 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, P103 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500014 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: >From P100 to P100': A new citation-rank approach Authors: Bornmann, L; Mutz, R Author Full Names: Bornmann, Lutz; Mutz, Ruediger Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1939-1943; 10.1002/asi.23152 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: scientometrics KeyWords Plus: PERCENTILES; INDICATORS; IMPACT; PUBLICATION Abstract: Properties of a percentile-based rating scale needed in bibliometrics are formulated. Based on these properties, P100 was recently introduced as a new citation-rank approach (Bornmann, Leydesdorff, & Wang, 2013). In this paper, we conceptualize P100 and propose an improvement which we call P100'. Advantages and disadvantages of citation-rank indicators are noted. Addresses: [Bornmann, Lutz] Adm Headquarters Max Planck Soc, Div Sci & Innovat Studies, Munich, Germany. [Mutz, Ruediger] ETH, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: bornmann at gv.mpg.de; ruediger.mutz at gess.ethz.ch Cited Reference Count: 13 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500014 Cited References: Waltman Ludo, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P372 SCHUBERT A, 1986, SCIENTOMETRICS, V9, P281 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, V174, P857 StataCorp, 2011, Stata Statistical Software: Release 12, Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P158 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P228 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, EMBO REPORTS, V14, P226 Schreiber Michael, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V97, P821 Egghe L, 2005, POWER LAWS IN THE INFORMATION PRODUCTION PROCESS: LOTKAIAN INFORMETRICS, P1 SAS Institute Inc., 2008, SAS/STAT 9. 2 user's guide, Fielding A, 2003, STATISTICAL MODELLING, V3, P127 Waltman Ludo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P2419 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P933 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340460000008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 - 2014) Authors: Chen, CM; Dubin, R; Kim, MC Author Full Names: Chen, Chaomei; Dubin, Rachael; Kim, Meen Chul Source: EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 14 (9):1295-1317; 10.1517/14712598.2014.920813 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: CiteSpace, graphene, regenerative medicine, review, scientometrics, tissue engineering KeyWords Plus: PLURIPOTENT STEM-CELLS; RANDOMIZED PHASE-1 TRIAL; MODIFIED T-CELLS; DEFINED FACTORS; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; SOMATIC-CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; GENERATION Abstract: Introduction: Our previous scientometric review of regenerative medicine provides a snapshot of the fast-growing field up to the end of 2011. The new review identifies emerging trends and new developments appearing in the literature of regenerative medicine based on relevant articles and reviews published between 2000 and the first month of 2014. Areas covered: Multiple datasets of publications relevant to regenerative medicine are constructed through topic search and citation expansion to ensure adequate coverage of the field. Networks of co-cited references representing the literature of regenerative medicine are constructed and visualized based on a combined dataset of 71,393 articles published between 2000 and 2014. Structural and temporal dynamics are identified in terms of most active topical areas and cited references. New developments are identified in terms of newly emerged clusters and research areas. Disciplinary-level patterns are visualized in dual-map overlays. Expert opinion: While research in induced pluripotent stem cells remains the most prominent area in the field of regenerative medicine, research related to clinical and therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine has experienced a considerable growth. In addition, clinical and therapeutic developments in regenerative medicine have demonstrated profound connections with the induced pluripotent stem cell research and stem cell research in general. A rapid adaptation of graphene-based nanomaterials in regenerative medicine is evident. Both basic research represented by stem cell research and application-oriented research typically found in tissue engineering are now increasingly integrated in the scientometric landscape of regenerative medicine. Tissue engineering is an interdisciplinary field in its own right. Advances in multiple disciplines such as stem cell research and graphene research have strengthened the connections between tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Addresses: [Chen, Chaomei; Dubin, Rachael; Kim, Meen Chul] Drexel Univ, Coll Comp & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. E-mail Addresses: chaomei.chen at drexel.edu Cited Reference Count: 86 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INFORMA HEALTHCARE, TELEPHONE HOUSE, 69-77 PAUL STREET, LONDON EC2A 4LQ, ENGLAND ISSN: 1471-2598 eISSN: 1744-7682 Web of Science Categories: Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Medicine, Research & Experimental Research Areas: Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Research & Experimental Medicine IDS Number: AN3BN Unique ID: WOS:000340460000008 Cited References: Hare Joshua M., 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, V54, P2277 Anokye-Danso Frederick, 2011, CELL STEM CELL, V8, P376 Lowry William E., 2010, JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, V123, P643 Chen Chaomei, 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P334 Brentjens Renier J., 2011, BLOOD, V118, P4817 Lu Jiayu, 2013, ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, V23, P3494 Burdick Jason A., 2011, ADVANCED MATERIALS, V23, PH41 Ieda Masaki, 2010, CELL, V142, P375 Zacharias David G., 2011, MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, V86, P634 Dotti Gianpietro, 2014, IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, V257, P107 Macchiarini Paolo, 2008, LANCET, V372, P2023 Kim Deok-Ho, 2010, ADVANCED MATERIALS, V22, P4551 Savoldo Barbara, 2011, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, V121, P1822 Takahashi Kazutoshi, 2006, CELL, V126, P663 EVANS MJ, 1981, NATURE, V292, P154 Levi Benjamin, 2011, STEM CELLS, V29, P576 Elloumi-Hannachi I., 2010, JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V267, P54 Chen Fa-Ming, 2012, BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, V30, P658 Stasi A. D., 2011, N. Engl. J. Med., V365, P1673 Kiskinis Evangelos, 2010, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, V120, P51 Ralston Amy, 2010, REPRODUCTION, V139, P35 Jain RK, 2005, SCIENCE, V307, P58 Ott Harald C., 2008, NATURE MEDICINE, V14, P213 Kim K., 2010, NATURE, V467, P285 Shi Yan, 2008, CELL STEM CELL, V2, P525 Gore Athurva, 2011, NATURE, V471, P63 Campbell KHS, 1996, NATURE, V380, P64 Pittenger MF, 1999, SCIENCE, V284, P143 Egami Mime, 2014, ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH, V37, P96 Cobo M. J., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1382 Watt Fiona M., 2010, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V365, P155 Williams Adam R., 2011, CIRCULATION RESEARCH, V109, P923 Zhao Tongbiao, 2011, NATURE, V474, P212 Hong Hyenjong, 2009, NATURE, V460, P1132 Liu Shao Qiong, 2010, SOFT MATTER, V6, P67 Okita Keisuke, 2013, STEM CELLS, V31, P458 Rosvall M, 2010, PLoS One, Pe8694 Takahashi Kazutoshi, 2007, CELL, V131, P861 Vierbuchen Thomas, 2010, NATURE, V463, P1035 Crapo Peter M., 2011, BIOMATERIALS, V32, P3233 Anastasia L., 2010, CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, V17, P1230 Jensen Michael C., 2014, IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, V257, P127 Bolli Roberto, 2011, LANCET, V378, P1847 Chen Chaomei, 2012, EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, V12, P593 Hanahan Douglas, 2011, CELL, V144, P646 Schnerch Angelique, 2010, STEM CELLS, V28, P419 Obokata Haruko, 2014, NATURE, V505, P641 Itzhaki Ilanit, 2011, NATURE, V471, P225 Jiang YH, 2002, NATURE, V418, P41 Chen G. -Y., 2012, BIOMATERIALS, V33, P418 Turtle Cameron J., 2012, CURRENT OPINION IN IMMUNOLOGY, V24, P633 Chen Fa-Ming, 2010, BIOMATERIALS, V31, P6279 Chen Chaomei, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P431 Xu Yuxi, 2010, ACS NANO, V4, P4324 Dvir Tal, 2011, NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, V6, P13 Chang David F., 2009, STEM CELLS, V27, P812 Karussis Dimitrios, 2010, ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, V67, P1187 Roach P., 2010, SURFACE SCIENCE REPORTS, V65, P145 Patterson Jennifer, 2010, MATERIALS TODAY, V13, P14 Makkar Raj R., 2012, LANCET, V379, P895 Porter David L., 2011, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V365, P725 Uygun Basak E., 2010, NATURE MEDICINE, V16, P814 Itoga Kazuyoshi, 2010, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, V20, P8768 Slaughter Brandon V., 2009, ADVANCED MATERIALS, V21, P3307 Warren Luigi, 2010, CELL STEM CELL, V7, P618 Cherry Anne B. C., 2012, CELL, V148, P1110 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 Lee Kangwon, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, V8, P153 Stadtfeld Matthias, 2010, GENES & DEVELOPMENT, V24, P2239 Kelm Jens M., 2010, ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, V62, P753 Ruella Marco, 2014, IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, V257, P14 Woltjen Knut, 2009, NATURE, V458, P766 Tormin Ariane, 2011, BLOOD, V117, P5067 Sommer Cesar A., 2010, STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY, V1, Lister Ryan, 2011, NATURE, V471, P68 GURDON JB, 1962, JOURNAL OF EMBRYOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL MORPHOLOGY, V10, P622 Teo Benjamin Kim Kiat, 2010, NUCLEAR MECHANICS AND GENOME REGULATION, V98, P241 Reya T, 2001, NATURE, V414, P105 Hanley Joanna, 2010, BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, V151, P16 Badylak Stephen F., 2009, ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, V5, P1 Chen Chaomei, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1386 Polo JM, 2010, Nat Biotechnol, V28, P845 Hoppe Alexander, 2011, BIOMATERIALS, V32, P2757 Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Dash M., 2011, PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE, V36, P981 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Acknowledgments in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines Authors: Diaz-Faes, AA; Bordons, M Author Full Names: Diaz-Faes, Adrian A.; Bordons, Maria Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1834-1849; 10.1002/asi.23081 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliometrics, text mining KeyWords Plus: SOCIAL-SCIENCES; CO-AUTHORSHIPS; COLLABORATION; COMMUNICATION; 20TH-CENTURY; INFORMATION; HUMANITIES; SOCIOLOGY; ARTICLES; REWARD Abstract: The acknowledgments in scientific publications are an important feature in the scholarly communication process. This research analyzes funding acknowledgment presence in scientific publications and introduces a novel approach for discovering text patterns by discipline in the acknowledgment section of papers. First, the presence of acknowledgments in 38,257 English-language papers published by Spanish researchers in 2010 is studied by subject area on the basis of the funding acknowledgment information available in the Web of Science database. Funding acknowledgments are present in two thirds of Spanish articles, with significant differences by subject area, number of authors, impact factor of journals, and, in one specific area, basic/applied nature of research. Second, the existence of specific acknowledgment patterns in English-language papers of Spanish researchers in 4 selected subject categories (cardiac and cardiovascular systems, economics, evolutionary biology, and statistics and probability) is explored through a combination of text mining and multivariate analyses. Peer interactive communication predominates in the more theoretical or social-oriented fields (statistics and probability, economics), whereas the recognition of technical assistance is more common in experimental research (evolutionary biology), and the mention of potential conflicts of interest emerges forcefully in the clinical field (cardiac and cardiovascular systems). The systematic inclusion of structured data about acknowledgments in journal articles and bibliographic databases would have a positive impact on the study of collaboration practices in science. Addresses: [Diaz-Faes, Adrian A.; Bordons, Maria] CSIC, Spanish Natl Res Council, IEDCYT, Ctr Human & Social Sci CCHS, Madrid 28037, Spain. E-mail Addresses: adrian.arias at cchs.csic.es; maria.bordons at cchs.csic.es Funding Acknowledgement: Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CSO2008-06310]; Spanish National Research Council (JAE predoctoral grant) Funding Text: This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CSO2008-06310) and the Spanish National Research Council (JAE predoctoral grant). We are very thankful to Javier Aparicio and Ignacio Santabarbara for their valuable assistance in data management as well as to Isabel Gomez and Purificacion Galindo for their comments on a draft of this article. We especially thank two anonymous referees for their useful suggestions, which contributed significantly to improving the original manuscript. Cited Reference Count: 55 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500007 Cited References: CRONIN B, 1993, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V44, P406 Gonzalez-Albo Borja, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P369 Berthier F., 1975, Analyse des Donnees Multidimensionnelles, Costas Rodrigo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1647 Cronin B, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P855 Lewison G, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V41, P17 NARIN F, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P25 Escofier B., 1992, Analisis Factoriales Simples y Multiples. Objetivos, Metodos e Interpretacion, HEFFNER AG, 1981, SCIENTOMETRICS, V3, P5 Nature, 2012, Guide to publication policies of the Nature journals, Lewison Grant, 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P129 ICMJE, 2013, Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: Authorship and contributorship, Rigby John, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P57 Vicente-Villardon J. L., 2010, MultBiplot: A package for multivariate analysis using biplots, Salager-Meyer Francoise, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P307 Bordons M, 2000, WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD, P197 Benzecri J. P., 1973, L'Analyse de Donnees, vol. 2. L'Analyse des Correspondances, Marusic A., 2011, Plos One, V6, P1 Melin G, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P363 DIGIUSTO E, 1994, SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, V38, P55 KASSIRER JP, 1991, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V325, P1510 CRONIN B, 1993, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V49, P29 Zhao Dangzhi, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P293 Giles CL, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V101, P17599 Bolasco S., 1992, Jornades Internacionals d'Analisi de Dades Textuals, P69 DAVIS CH, 1993, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V44, P590 Lebart L., 1994, Statistique Textuelle, PATEL N, 1973, SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, V12, P77 GILLETT R, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V22, P253 CRONIN B, 1992, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V48, P107 VINKLER P, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICSEUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON SCIENTOMETRIC METHODS OF RESEARCH EVALUATION IN THE SCIENCES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, APR 13-17, 1991, POTSDAM, GERMANY, V26, P213 Wang Xianwen, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V91, P591 Bordons Maria, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P443 Wang Jue, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P563 Winston R. B., 1985, Journal of Counseling and Development, V63, P55 Cronin B, 2004, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V55, P160 HUNT R, 1991, NATURE, V352, P187 Lamalle C., 2003, Lexico 3, Laudel G, 2002, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V11, P3 Salager-Meyer Francoise, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P763 Levitt Jonathan M., 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2011: THE 13TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 213th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI), JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, P1013 Gazni Ali, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P251 Wager Elizabeth, 2009, MATURITAS, V62, P109 Lebart L., 2000, Analisis Estadistico de Textos, CRONIN B, 1991, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V47, P227 Claxton LD, 2005, MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, V589, P31 Cronin B., 1995, The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role of Acknowledgments in the Primary Communication Process, Cronin B., 1995, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, V18, P172 Gonzalez-Alcaide Gregorio, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P297 Archambault Eric, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P329 Stossel T. P., 2012, What's wrong with COI?, Edge D, 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching, V17, P102 MCCAIN KW, 1991, SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, V16, P491 Noma E., 1986, Research report under CHI and NIH contracts., Rigby John, 2011, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V20, P365 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340518700003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Network Analysis of Publications on Topological Indices from the Web of Science Authors: Bodlaj, J; Batagelj, V Author Full Names: Bodlaj, Jernej; Batagelj, Vladimir Source: MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 33 (8):514-535; 10.1002/minf.201400014 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Clustering, Network analysis, Scientometrics, Topological index, Web of Science KeyWords Plus: SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS Abstract: In this paper we analyze a collection of bibliographic networks, constructed from the data from the Web of Science on works (papers, books, etc.) on the topic of topological indices and on relating scientific fields. We present the general outlook and more specific findings about authors, works and journals, subtopics and keywords and also important relations between them based on scientometric approaches like the strongest and main citation paths, the main themes on citation path based on key-words, results of co-authorship analysis in form of the most prominent islands of citing authors, groups of collaborating authors, two-mode cores of authors and works. We investigate the nature of citing of authors, important journals and citing of works between them, journals preferred by authors and expose hierarchy of similar collaborating authors, based on keywords they use. We perform temporal analysis on one important journal as well. We give a comprehensive scientometric insight into the field of topological indices. Addresses: [Bodlaj, Jernej] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Comp & Informat Sci, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia. [Bodlaj, Jernej] Univ Primorska, Andrej Marusic Inst, Koper 6000, Slovenia. [Batagelj, Vladimir] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Math & Phys, Dept Math, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia. [Batagelj, Vladimir] Inst Math Phys & Mech, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia. E-mail Addresses: jernej.bodlaj at abelium.eu Funding Acknowledgement: Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) [J5-5537]; EUROCORES Programme EUROGIGA (project GReGAS) of the European Science Foundation; European Union; European Social Fund; Slovenian Ministry of Education, Science and Sport; operation Competence Center KC CLASS - European Union, European Regional Fund Funding Text: Special thanks to professor Milan Randic and to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. This work has been in part financed by Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), grant J5-5537, as well as by grant within the EUROCORES Programme EUROGIGA (project GReGAS) of the European Science Foundation. The first author was financed in part by the European Union, European Social Fund, Slovenian Ministry of Education, Science and Sport and in part through operation Competence Center KC CLASS, financed by the European Union, European Regional Fund. Cited Reference Count: 41 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH, BOSCHSTRASSE 12, D-69469 WEINHEIM, GERMANY ISSN: 1868-1743 eISSN: 1868-1751 Web of Science Categories: Chemistry, Medicinal; Mathematical & Computational Biology Research Areas: Pharmacology & Pharmacy; Mathematical & Computational Biology IDS Number: AN3WF Unique ID: WOS:000340518700003 Cited References: Newman MEJ, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Scott J., 2000, Davarpanah M. R., 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P21 Batagelj V., Efficient Algorithms for Citation Network Analysis, Laumann E. O., 1983, Applied Network Analysis, P18 WIENER H, 1947, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, V69, P17 Ahmed Adel, 2007, Asia-Pacific Symposium on Visualisation 2007, ProceedingsAsia/Pacific Symposium on Visualisation 2007, FEB 05-07, 2007, Sydney, AUSTRALIA, P17 Batagelj V, 1998, Connections, V21, P47 Bodlaj J., Network Analysis of publications on tolological indices from Web of Science, Kejzar N., 2010, Proc. IFCS'09, Classification as a Tool for Research, Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, Berlin, P525 Modak Jayant M., 2008, CURRENT SCIENCE, V94, P1265 Kossinets Gueorgi, 2006, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V28, P247 Marschall N., 2006, Batagelj Vladimir, 2011, ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION, V5, P129 SALTON G, 1988, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V24, P513 Balaban A. T., 1976, Chemical Applications of Graph Theory, HUMMON NP, 1990, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V12, P273 Karelson M., 2000, Molecular Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR, Balaban A. T., 1999, Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, P21 Zaversnik M., 2004, Islands in Sunbelt XXIV, Fortunato Santo, 2010, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V486, P75 HOSOYA H, 1971, BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, V44, P2332 Balaban A. T., 1983, P21 TODESCHINI R, 1992, CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, V15, P51 Doreian P., 2005, Generalized Blockmodeling, Moody J, 2004, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V69, P213 de Nooy W., 2011, Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, Willett Peter, 2007, JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, V26, P602 Willett Peter, 2009, QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, V28, P1231 Devillers J., 1999, Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, KELLEY JE, 1961, OPERATIONS RESEARCH, V9, P296 BALABAN AT, 1982, CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, V89, P399 Batagelj V., WoS2Pajek, Li L., 2007, Internet Math., V2, P431 Mueller W. R., 1990, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., V30, P160 RANDIC M, 1975, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, V97, P6609 Todeschini R., 2009, Molecular Descriptors for Chemoin-formatics, Batagelj Vladimir, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P845 Builova N.M., 2012, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, V39, Boyack Kevin W., 2007, Proceedings of ISSI 2007: 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vols I and II11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientrometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, P112 Liu H., MontyLingua: An end-to-end natural language processor with common sense, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340320600030 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A comparison of city size distributions for China and India from 1950 to 2010 Authors: Luckstead, J; Devadoss, S Author Full Names: Luckstead, Jeff; Devadoss, Stephen Source: ECONOMICS LETTERS, 124 (2):290-295; 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.06.002 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: China, City size, General Pareto, India, Lognormal, Pareto KeyWords Plus: ZIPFS LAW; CITIES Abstract: We examine the distributions of Chinese and Indian city sizes for seven decades (1950s to 2010s) using lognormal, Pareto, and general Pareto distributions. We ascertain which distribution fits the data and how the city size distributions change during these periods. The Chinese city size distribution is represented by lognormal in the early periods (1950-1990) and by Pareto in 2010, but is not characterized by Zipf, which could be attributed to Chinese government's restrictions of migration from rural to urban areas and the one-child policy. In contrast, the Indian city size distribution transitions from lognormal in the earlier periods to Zipf in the later periods. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Addresses: [Luckstead, Jeff] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA. [Devadoss, Stephen] Univ Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843 USA. E-mail Addresses: jluckste at uark.edu Cited Reference Count: 19 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, 1001 LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND ISSN: 0165-1765 eISSN: 1873-7374 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AN1CP Unique ID: WOS:000340320600030 Cited References: Soo Kwok Tong, 2007, URBAN STUDIES, V44, P1 Binswanger-Mkhize H. P., 2012, Technical Report, Wang D., 2008, Working Paper No. 15, Ioannides YM, 2003, REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, V33, P127 Panagariya A, 2004, Wp/04143, ROSEN KT, 1980, JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, V8, P165 United Nations, 2011, World Population Prospects - The 2010 Revision, Pines D., 1998, Macleod C., 2001, The Independent, Zipf G., 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Last Effort, Snyder M., 2000, Govermental control and cultural adaptation: a comparison between rural and urban reactions to China's fertility control policies, LI JL, 1995, POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, V21, P563 The World Bank, 2014, World development indicators database, Anderson G, 2005, REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, V35, P756 Gangopadhyay Kausik, 2009, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V388, P2682 Gabaix X, 1999, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V114, P739 Krugman P., 1996, The Self-Organizing Economy, Urzua CM, 2000, ECONOMICS LETTERS, V66, P257 Marshall J., 2013, The Dipolmat, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340327200002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: COMMUNICATING SCIENCE IN INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH: SCHOLARLY JOURNALS, PUBLICATION PRAXIS, LANGUAGE DOMAIN LOSS AND BENEFITS Authors: Cianflone, E Author Full Names: Cianflone, Eugenio Source: CIRCULO DE LINGUISTICA APLICADA A LA COMUNICACION, (57):45-58; 10.5209/rev_CLAC.2014.v57.44514 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: International English, academic reading, academic writing, Lingua Franca KeyWords Plus: SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION; GROWTH Abstract: The leading role of English as the international language of scientific communication has been extensively studied. Available data show that English exerts powerful effects in publication praxis since the use of a common idiom, or Lingua Franca, serves two main assets: to gain international visibility, funding and career advancement and to cater for the worldwide communication of ideas among subjects with different linguistic backgrounds. Aim of this paper is to discuss contemporary publication praxis following specific datasets: the growth of scholarly journals, the publication output in English compared to other national languages, how this situation affects communication in writing and in reading for scholarly research. Addresses: Univ Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy. Cited Reference Count: 38 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: UNIV COMPLUTENSE MADRID, SERVICIO PUBLICACIONES, CIUDAD UNIV, OBISPO TREJO 3, MADRID, 28040, SPAIN ISSN: 1576-4737 Web of Science Categories: Linguistics; Language & Linguistics Research Areas: Linguistics IDS Number: AN1FD Unique ID: WOS:000340327200002 Cited References: Benfield John R., 2006, CHEST, V129, P1728 de Ribaupiere Helene, 2011, Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Online books, complementary social media and crowdsourcing, P19 Swan Alma, 2005, JISC Technical Report, Ware Mark, 2009, The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journals Publishing, Swales John M., 1990, Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Newman Anthony, 2011, How to get published, Power Point Presentation, Larsen Peder Olesen, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P575 Renear Allen H., 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P828 Bartol T., 2010, Journal of Central European Agriculture, V11, P1 Swales John M., 2004, Research Genres. Explorations and Applications, Cianflone Eugenio, 2012, IBERICA, P173 Tardy Christine, 2004, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V3, P247 Hyland Ken, 2010, JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, V9, P116 Mabe M, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P147 Mabe MA, 2002, ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, V54, P149 Dugo Giacomo, 2011, Italian Journal of Food Science, V23, P1 Cianflone Eugenio, 2012, Formatting Titles in Food Science, Benfield JR, 2000, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, V18, P642 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P173 Shelton Robert D., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P351 Giannoni Davide S., 2008, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V7, P97 Ferguson Gibson, 2007, Iberica, V13, P7 Mabe Michael, 2010, New Review of Academic Librarianship, V16, P132 Hyland Ken, 2009, Academic Discourse, Phillipson Robert, 2008, WORLD ENGLISHES, V27, P250 Fanelli Daniele, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P891 Fraser Veronique J., 2009, Respiratory Research, Pautasso Marco, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P193 McKay Sandra, 2002, Teaching English as an international language, Bjork Bo-Christer, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Cal Carvela Mario, 2009, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V8, P152 van Dalen HP, 2005, KYKLOS, V58, P395 Jenkins J., 2007, English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity, Tijssen Robert J. W., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V71, P303 King Donald W., 2006, D-Lib Magazine, Salager-Meyer F., 2008, Journal of English Academic Purposes, V7, P121 Ferguson Gibson, 2011, WORLD ENGLISHES, V30, P41 Bjork Bo-Christer, 2009, Information Research, V14, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340257300005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Country of Authorship and Collaboration Affect Citations of Articles by South and East Asian Authors in Agronomy Journals: A Case Study of China, Japan, and India Authors: Xia, XD; Wang, ZG; Wu, YW; Ruan, LQ; Wang, L Author Full Names: Xia, Xiaodong; Wang, Zhigang; Wu, Yawen; Ruan, Liuqing; Wang, Lei Source: SERIALS REVIEW, 40 (2):118-122; 10.1080/00987913.2014.929610 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: citations, bibliometrics, journal impact factors KeyWords Plus: IMPACT FACTORS Abstract: A total of 7,707 agronomy papers (2006 to 2011) by Chinese, Indian, and Japanese authors were identified in the Web of Science (WoS) database. The impact factors (IFs) of papers and the uncited paper rate (UPR) in a particular journal with a given country's authorship was calculated as IFs calculated in Journal Citation Reports. For India, the impact factors of articles authored within one country (within-country impact factor) were significantly lower than the overall IF. The impact factors of collaborative articles (collaborative impact factor) and within-country impact factors for the three countries differed significantly. The uncited rates of collaborative papers (uncited collaborative paper rate) and uncited rates of papers authored within one country (uncited within-country paper rate) of China and Japan were significantly different. However, for India, the uncited collaborative paper rate was significantly lower than the uncited within-country paper rate; collaboration (mostly with developed countries) exerted a negative effect. Addresses: [Xia, Xiaodong; Wang, Zhigang; Wu, Yawen; Ruan, Liuqing; Wang, Lei] China Natl Rice Res Inst, Ctr Sci & Tech Informat, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: ricesong at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 13 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 0098-7913 eISSN: 1879-095X Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN0EU Unique ID: WOS:000340257300005 Cited References: Levitt Jonathan M., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P171 STATZNER B, 1995, OIKOS, V72, P440 Adam D, 2002, NATURE, V415, P726 Bartneck Christoph, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P41 Kokko H, 1999, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V14, P382 Postma Erik, 2007, PLOS ONE, V2, Meneghini Rogerio, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, Abbasi Alireza, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P683 Gorraiz Juan, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V91, P417 Gazni Ali, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P251 Golubic Rajna, 2008, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS4th ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity, DEC 01-03, 2006, Tampa, FL, V14, P41 Didegah Fereshteh, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P861 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340431000011 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: INFOR-COMMUNICATIVE MNEMOSYNE: axiomatic possibility of construction of a memory concept for information science Authors: da Silva, LEF; de Oliveira, BJF Author Full Names: Ferreira da Silva, Luiz Eduardo; Freire de Oliveira, Bernardina Juvenal Source: INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS, 24 (1):135-143; 2014 Language: Portuguese Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Axiom, Concept, Information Science, Potentially Produced Memory Abstract: The present article intends to contextualize the concept of memory in the universe of information science, since this conceptual polysemy is marked by changes that pervade the trenches of society. Thus, we aimed to point out axiomatically a specific memory concept for Information Science. Through a theoretical and bibliographical investigation, we tried to clarify the possibility of an axiom between the lines of contemporary Information Science. Therefore, the memory in Information Science can be dissociated from an interconnection with the evocation of historical memory (space and time), because the memory of Information Science is revitalized by informational traces via a potentially produced memory that is mnemonically structured in the contours of society through the bifurcation with organization, access and use of information and later in the process of information representation and retrieval. Addresses: [Ferreira da Silva, Luiz Eduardo] Fed Univ Para, BR-66059 Belem, Para, Brazil. [Freire de Oliveira, Bernardina Juvenal] Fed Univ Para, Programa Posgrad Ciencia Informacao, BR-66059 Belem, Para, Brazil. E-mail Addresses: fabib at ufpa.br; bernardinafreire at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: UNIV FEDERAL CAMPINA GRANDE, RUA APRIGIO VELOSO 882, BODO CONGO, CAMPINA GRANDE PB, 58109 090, BRAZIL ISSN: 0104-0146 eISSN: 1809-4783 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN2QS Unique ID: WOS:000340431000011 Cited References: REIS J. C., 2006, Historia e Teoria: historicismo, modernidade, temporalidade e verdade, BRONOWSKI J., 1997, As origens do conhecimento e da imaginacao, DOSSE F., 2001, A historia prova do tempo: da historia em migalhas ao resgate do sentido, ZEMAN J., 1970, O Conceito de Informacao na Ciencia Contemporanea: coloquios filosoficos internacionais de Royaumont, P154 BORKO H, 1968, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V19, P3 de OLIVEIRA E. B., 2008, ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2008, Sao Paulo, V9, DODEBEI V. L. D. L. de M., 2010, ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2010, Rio de Janeiro, V11, POLLAK Michel, 1989, Estudos Historicos, V2, P3 DIEHL A. A., 2002, Cultura historiografica: memoria, identidade e representacao, BOURDIEU P., 1983, Questoes de sociologia, DAHLBERG I., 1978, Ciencia da Informacao, V7, P101 DELEUZE G., 2001, Nietzsche e Filosofia, RICOUER P., 2007, Memoria, historia, esquecimento, BLOCH M., 2001, Apologia da historia ou oficio do historiador, ARISTOTELES P., 1997, In Aristeteles, Horacio, Longino, 2011, O campo da Ci ncia da Informacao: Genese, conexoes e especificidades, CASSIRER E., 1977, Antropologia filosofica, de CERTEAU M., 2007, A escrita da historia, HALBWACHS M., 2006, A Memoria Coletiva, CHARTIER Roger, 1991, Estud. av., V5, P173 MOREIRO GONZALEZ J. A., 1998, Introduccion al estudio de La informacion y la documentacion, CANDAU J., 2011, Memoria e Identidade, GINZBURG C., 1990, Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e historia, ADORNO T., 1992, Teoria estetica, P70 de CERTEAU M., 2005, A invencao do cotidiano, V1, SORGENTINI H., 2003, Revista Brasileira de Historia, V23, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340422700008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Linked-Data-Driven and Semantically-Enabled Journal Portal for Scientometrics Authors: Hu, Y; Janowicz, K; McKenzie, G; Sengupta, K; Hitzler, P Author Full Names: Hu, Yingjie; Janowicz, Krzysztof; McKenzie, Grant; Sengupta, Kunal; Hitzler, Pascal Edited by: Alani H; Kagal L; Fokoue A; Groth P; Biemann C; Parreira JX; Aroyo L; Noy N; Welty C; Janowicz K Source: SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2013, PART II, 8219 114-129; 2013 Book Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 12th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) Conference Date: OCT 21-25, 2013 Conference Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA Conference Sponsors: Bing, Fluid Operat, Microsoft Res, PreviousNext, IBM Res, Ontotext, Yahoo, IOS Press, OpenLink Software KeyWords Plus: INDEX; WEB Abstract: The Semantic Web journal by IOS Press follows a unique open and transparent process during which each submitted manuscript is available online together with the full history of its successive decision statuses, assigned editors, solicited and voluntary reviewers, their full text reviews, and in many cases also the authors' response letters. Combined with a highly-customized, Drupal-based journal management system, this provides the journal with semantically rich manuscript time lines and networked data about authors, reviewers, and editors. These data are now exposed using a SPARQL endpoint, an extended Bibo ontology, and a modular Linked Data portal that provides interactive scientometrics based on established and new analysis methods. The portal can be customized for other journals as well. Addresses: [Hu, Yingjie; Janowicz, Krzysztof; McKenzie, Grant] Univ Calif, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA. Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 0302-9743 ISBN: 978-3-642-41338-4; 978-3-642-41337-7 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods Research Areas: Computer Science IDS Number: BB0MJ Unique ID: WOS:000340422700008 Cited References: Glenisson P, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1548 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 D'Arcus B., 2009, Bibliographic Ontology Specification, Hitzler P., 2013, Semantic Web, V4, P117 Hood WW, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V52, P291 Kessler C., 2012, GIScience 2012, V7478, P102 Tang J., 2008, Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P990 Stadler C., 2012, Semantic Web, V3, P333 Brody T., 2007, CTWatch Quarterly, V3, Shotton David, 2009, PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, V5, Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P547 Auer Soeren, 2007, SEMANTIC WEB, PROCEEDINGS6th International Semantic Web Conference/2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007/ASWC 2007), NOV 11-15, 2007, Busan, SOUTH KOREA, V4825, P722 Braun Tibor, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P169 Zhou D., 2006, Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P248 Janowicz Krzysztof, 2012, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V25, P48 Wang X., 2006, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P424 Blei DM, 2003, JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH18th International Conference on Machine Learning, JUN 28-JUL 01, 2001, WILLIAMSTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, V3, P993 =================================================================== *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis Authors: Ding, Y; Zhang, G; Chambers, T; Song, M; Wang, XL; Zhai, CX Author Full Names: Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy; Song, Min; Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1820-1833; 10.1002/asi.23256 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliographic citations, citation analysis KeyWords Plus: CONCEPT SYMBOLS; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; SCIENCE; RETRIEVAL; STATEMENTS; REFERENCES; SOCIOLOGY; RELEVANCE; NETWORKS Abstract: Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery. Addresses: [Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy] Indiana Univ, Dept Informat & Lib Sci, Sch Informat & Comp, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA. [Song, Min] Yonsei Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Coll Liberal Arts, Seoul 120749, South Korea. [Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang] Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Coll Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA. E-mail Addresses: dingying at indiana.edu; guozhang at indiana.edu; tisch at indiana.edu; min.song at yonsei.ac.kr; xwang95 at illinois.edu; czhai at illinois.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2009-361-A00027] Funding Text: Min Song was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2009-361-A00027). Cited Reference Count: 88 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500006 Cited References: Qazvinian V., 2008, COLING '08 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, V1, P689 Dietz L., 2007, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '07, P233 BROOKS TA, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P223 Lipetz B.-A., 1965, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V16, P81 Teufel S., 2006, 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, sigDAIL '09, Proceedings, P80 Ramakrishnan C., 2012, Source Code for Biology and Medicine, V7, P1 Meij E., 2007, RIAO '07 Large Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video, and Sound) Proceedings, P665 Athar A., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Student Session, ACL-HLT, P81 GILBERT GN, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P113 HERLACH G, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P308 Zhang Guo, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P1490 Byrnes J. E., 2013, PeerJPrePrints No. e11v1., CHUBIN DE, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P423 Small H., 1982, V3, P287 SPIEGELROSING I, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P97 SNIZEK WE, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V20, P25 Siddharthan A., 2007, NAACL HLT 2007 Proceedings, P316 Qazvinian V., 2010, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P555 Garzone M. A., 1997, Automated classification of citations using linguistic semantic grammars, Tang Jie, 2009, ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS13th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge and Data Mining, APR 27-30, 2009, Bangkok, THAILAND, V5476, P572 Borgman C. L., 1990, Scholarly communications and bibliometrics, Teufel S, 2002, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, V28, P409 Hjorland B, 2001, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V35, P249 Chang J., 2009, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), V5, P81 Jenssen TK, 2001, NATURE GENETICS, V28, P21 Dong C., 2011, 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2011, P623 Mons Barend, 2011, NATURE GENETICS, V43, P281 REESPOTTER LK, 1989, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V25, P677 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Nanba H., 1999, Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI '99, P926 Nallapati R. M., 2008, 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '08, P542 White Marilyn Domas, 2006, LIBRARY TRENDS, V55, P22 Abu-Jbara A., 2011, 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P500 CANO V, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P284 He Q., 2010, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, P421 Pham SB, 2003, AI 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DEC 03-05, 2003, PERTH, AUSTRALIA, V2903, P759 Garfield E., 1974, Essays of an information scientist, V2, P1974 Arnold Andrew, 2009, WIRELESS ALGORITHMS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS4th International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, AUG 16-18, 2009, Boston, MA, V5682, P541 Ding Y., 2013, PLoS ONE, V8, P1 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 Teufel S., 2000, Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text, Schlitt T, 2003, GENOME RESEARCH, V13, P2568 Mohammad S., 2009, Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P584 Stansbury MC, 2002, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V24, P157 OCONNOR J, 1982, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V18, P125 Elkiss Aaron, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P51 FROST CO, 1979, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V49, P399 Becher T., 1989, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectural enqiry and the culture of disciplines, Liu Y., 2009, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '09, P665 Schneider JW, 2004, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V60, P524 Glenisson P, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1548 Ding Ying, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P583 Voos H., 1976, Journal of Academic Librarianship, V1, P19 MCCAIN KW, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V17, P127 SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Nanba H., 2004, LREC: 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Small Henry, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P373 Ziman J. M., 1968, Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science, PERITZ BC, 1983, SCIENTOMETRICS, V5, P303 Maricic S, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P530 Schneider Jesper W., 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P573 Fujii A., 2007, Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '07, P793 VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 MERTON RK, 1957, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V22, P635 Mei Q., 2008, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) with the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT) of the North American Chapter of the ACL, P816 White MD, 2001, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V37, P721 BONZI S, 1982, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V33, P208 Qazvinian V., 2008, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, V2, Suppe F, 1998, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, V65, P381 Huang W., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'12, P1910 Kupiec J., 1995, Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '95, P68 Hodges T. L., 1972, Citation indexing: Its potential for bibliographical control, Glaser BG, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Kataria S., 2011, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Volume Three, IJCAI '11, P2274 Nanba H., 2000, Advances in Classification Research Online, V11, P117 Bradshaw S, 2003, RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, AUG 17-22, 2003, TRONDHEIM, NORWAY, V2769, P499 Ritchie A., 2008, 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Proceedings, P213 Cronin B., 2005, The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards, Marsh EE, 2003, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V59, P647 Angrosh M. A., 2010, Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL'10, P293 He Q., 2011, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '11, P755 CRONIN B, 1981, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V37, P16 Cronin B., 1984, Citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, OPPENHEIM C, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P225 Ritchie A., 2006, Workshop on How Can Computational Linguistics Improve Information Retrieval? CLIIR '06 Proceedings, P25 Garfield E., 1964, Statistical association methods for merchanized documentation. Symposium Proceedings Washington 1964, P189 Pettigrew KE, 2001, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V52, P62 ================================================================= Search terms matched: BIBLIOMETRICS(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A systematic way of identifying and forecasting technological reverse salients using QFD, bibliometrics, and trend impact analysis: A carbon nanotube biosensor case Authors: Han, K; Shin, J Author Full Names: Han, Kyunam; Shin, Juneseuk Source: TECHNOVATION, 34 (9):559-570; SI 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.009 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Reverse salient, Forecasting, QFD, Bibliometrics, Trend impact analysis, Carbon nanotube biosensor KeyWords Plus: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; SENSORS; DELPHI; COMMERCIALIZATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; INDUSTRIES; CHALLENGES; DIFFUSION Abstract: Experts have more difficulty identifying reverse salients in R&D because of increasing technological complexity and a shortened technology lifecycle. As an alternative, we suggest a new and systematic method of identifying and forecasting reverse salients using QED (quality function deployment), bibliometric analysis, and TIA (trend impact analysis). QED allows users to systematically identify and prioritize reverse salients. An integration of QFD, bibliometric analysis, and TIA makes it possible to specify key performance indicators of reverse salient in order to identify the performance gap between current and market-required performance and to make a probabilistic forecast about when reverse salients will be corrected. Our method will help managers identify a top priority reverse salient, forecast its future, and thus make better R&D decisions with regard to market requirements. A carbon nanotube biosensor technology is used as an example. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Han, Kyunam] Korea Intellectual Property Strategy Inst, Dept Business Consulting, Seoul 135980, South Korea. [Shin, Juneseuk] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Kyonggi Do 440746, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: knhan at kipsi.re.kr; jsshin at skku.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2013R1A1A2009406] Funding Text: This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A2009406). Cited Reference Count: 65 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0166-4972 eISSN: 1879-2383 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Industrial; Management; Operations Research & Management Science Research Areas: Engineering; Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science IDS Number: AN0YN Unique ID: WOS:000340310000007 Cited References: Sub N. P., 2001, Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, V4, Lee Thomas Ming-Hung, 2008, SENSORS, V8, P5535 Bolger Fergus, 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1500 Alencar M. S. M., 2007, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V74, P1661 PORTER AL, 1995, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V49, P237 Bijker W. E., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Mulder K., 2001, Technol. Soc., V23, P265 Dedehayir O., 2009, J. Ind. Eng. Manage., V2, P569 Agami Nedaa, 2010, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V77, P1051 Jolly V. K., 1997, Commercializing New Technologies: Getting from Mind to Market, BYRNE JG, 1993, DESIGNING FOR DIVERSITY, VOLS 1 AND 2Human-Factors-and-Ergomonics-Society 37th Annual Meeting: Designing for Diversity, OCT 11-15, 1993, SEATTLE, WA, P427 Arthur W. B., 2009, The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves, Hughes T. P., 1983, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, P1880 Banuls Victor A., 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1579 Mochizuki A., 2001, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, V14, Burg Brian R., 2011, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, V26, P1561 Murmann Johann Peter, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY, V35, P925 Linton Jonathan D., 2008, INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL, V26, P83 Dedehayir Ozgur, 2008, Journal of technology management & innovation, V3, P55 Saeed Khalid, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN, V32, P559 Jacobs Christopher B., 2010, ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, V662, P105 Van Raan AFJ, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P491 Cheng An-Chin, 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P163 Kerr Clive, 2013, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V80, P1050 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 Endo Morinobu, 2008, CARBON NANOTUBES, V111, P13 Holman M. W., 2008, The Nanotech Report, MOED HF, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P131 Gordon T. J., 2009, Future Research Methodology-Version 3.0, Yang Wenrong, 2010, ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, V49, P2114 Hung SC, 2006, TECHNOVATION, V26, P104 SULLIVAN LP, 1986, QUALITY PROGRESS, V19, P39 SPITALSKY Z, 2010, PROG POLYM SCI, V35, P357 Linstone Harold A., 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P1712 Kostoff Ronald N., 2007, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V74, P1733 Dedehayir Ozgur, 2011, TECHNOVATION, V31, P627 Van Raan AFJ, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P133 Vashist Sandeep Kumar, 2011, BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, V29, P169 Landeta Jon, 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V73, P467 SAHAL D, 1981, RESEARCH POLICY, V10, P2 Hogaboam L, 2013, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, MacKenzie D., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, P195 Agami Nedaa, 2009, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V76, P952 Wang Juite, 2010, TECHNOVATION, V30, P601 Kuusi Osmo, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P759 Teichert T., 2008, World Patent Inf, V30, P106 Juanola-Feliu E., 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P193 Takeishi A, 2005, JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V14, P291 McNeil R. D., 2007, Barriers to Nanotechnology Commercialization: Final Report, P1 Hall B., 2001, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 8498, P3 SAHAL D, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P61 Bhat JSA, 2005, TECHNOVATION, V25, P457 Li Chunyu, 2008, COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V68, P1227 Cohen L, 1995, Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You, Carvalho M. M., 2013, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V80, P1418 Wang J., 2004, Electroanalysis, V17, P7 Palchetti I., 2010, Sensors and Microsystems: AISEM 2009 Proceedings, P15 Yanez Mario, 2010, TECHNOVATION, V30, P389 CLARK KB, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P235 Fam D. W. H., 2011, SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, V157, P1 Lo Chih-cheng, 2012, TECHNOVATION, V32, P168 Kim Wanki, 2010, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V77, P566 Meyer Patrick E., 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P77 Costas Rodrigo, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P193 Meyer MS, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P163 [X] Search terms matched: BIBLIOMETRIC(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Field-normalized bibliometric evaluation of leading research institutions in chemistry in China and India Authors: Prathap, G Author Full Names: Prathap, Gangan Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 107 (2):269-272; JUL 25 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric indicators, chemistry, field-normalization, research institutions ranking Abstract: Chemistry is the biggest area of research in which India publishes and it is the second biggest for China in recent years. Within this broad research area, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is India's biggest single academic research contributor, while the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is China's biggest player. In this communication, we use field-normalized bibliometric indicators from the latest (2013) release of SCImago Institutions Rankings World Reports to show that while the leading institutions from CSIR are showing a declining trend in the quality of research output, their counterparts from CAS are rapidly improving on both quality and quantity terms. Addresses: CSIR, Natl Inst Interdisciplinary Sci & Technol, Thiruvananthapuram 695019, Kerala, India. E-mail Addresses: gp at niist.res.in Cited Reference Count: 3 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AM6YN Unique ID: WOS:000340012000026 Cited References: Nishy P., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P245 Radojicic Zoran, 2012, CURRENT SCIENCE, V103, P158 Schubert A, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P311 *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis Authors: Ding, Y; Zhang, G; Chambers, T; Song, M; Wang, XL; Zhai, CX Author Full Names: Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy; Song, Min; Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1820-1833; 10.1002/asi.23256 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliographic citations, citation analysis KeyWords Plus: CONCEPT SYMBOLS; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; SCIENCE; RETRIEVAL; STATEMENTS; REFERENCES; SOCIOLOGY; RELEVANCE; NETWORKS Abstract: Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery. Addresses: [Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy] Indiana Univ, Dept Informat & Lib Sci, Sch Informat & Comp, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA. [Song, Min] Yonsei Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Coll Liberal Arts, Seoul 120749, South Korea. [Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang] Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Coll Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA. E-mail Addresses: dingying at indiana.edu; guozhang at indiana.edu; tisch at indiana.edu; min.song at yonsei.ac.kr; xwang95 at illinois.edu; czhai at illinois.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2009-361-A00027] Funding Text: Min Song was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2009-361-A00027). Cited Reference Count: 88 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500006 Cited References: Qazvinian V., 2008, COLING '08 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, V1, P689 Dietz L., 2007, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '07, P233 BROOKS TA, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P223 Lipetz B.-A., 1965, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V16, P81 Teufel S., 2006, 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, sigDAIL '09, Proceedings, P80 Ramakrishnan C., 2012, Source Code for Biology and Medicine, V7, P1 Meij E., 2007, RIAO '07 Large Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video, and Sound) Proceedings, P665 Athar A., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Student Session, ACL-HLT, P81 GILBERT GN, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P113 HERLACH G, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P308 Zhang Guo, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P1490 Byrnes J. E., 2013, PeerJPrePrints No. e11v1., CHUBIN DE, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P423 Small H., 1982, V3, P287 SPIEGELROSING I, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P97 SNIZEK WE, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V20, P25 Siddharthan A., 2007, NAACL HLT 2007 Proceedings, P316 Qazvinian V., 2010, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P555 Garzone M. A., 1997, Automated classification of citations using linguistic semantic grammars, Tang Jie, 2009, ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS13th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge and Data Mining, APR 27-30, 2009, Bangkok, THAILAND, V5476, P572 Borgman C. L., 1990, Scholarly communications and bibliometrics, Teufel S, 2002, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, V28, P409 Hjorland B, 2001, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V35, P249 Chang J., 2009, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), V5, P81 Jenssen TK, 2001, NATURE GENETICS, V28, P21 Dong C., 2011, 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2011, P623 Mons Barend, 2011, NATURE GENETICS, V43, P281 REESPOTTER LK, 1989, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V25, P677 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Nanba H., 1999, Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI '99, P926 Nallapati R. M., 2008, 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '08, P542 White Marilyn Domas, 2006, LIBRARY TRENDS, V55, P22 Abu-Jbara A., 2011, 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P500 CANO V, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P284 He Q., 2010, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, P421 Pham SB, 2003, AI 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DEC 03-05, 2003, PERTH, AUSTRALIA, V2903, P759 Garfield E., 1974, Essays of an information scientist, V2, P1974 Arnold Andrew, 2009, WIRELESS ALGORITHMS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS4th International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, AUG 16-18, 2009, Boston, MA, V5682, P541 Ding Y., 2013, PLoS ONE, V8, P1 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 Teufel S., 2000, Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text, Schlitt T, 2003, GENOME RESEARCH, V13, P2568 Mohammad S., 2009, Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P584 Stansbury MC, 2002, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V24, P157 OCONNOR J, 1982, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V18, P125 Elkiss Aaron, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P51 FROST CO, 1979, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V49, P399 Becher T., 1989, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectural enqiry and the culture of disciplines, Liu Y., 2009, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '09, P665 Schneider JW, 2004, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V60, P524 Glenisson P, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1548 Ding Ying, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P583 Voos H., 1976, Journal of Academic Librarianship, V1, P19 MCCAIN KW, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V17, P127 SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Nanba H., 2004, LREC: 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Small Henry, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P373 Ziman J. M., 1968, Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science, PERITZ BC, 1983, SCIENTOMETRICS, V5, P303 Maricic S, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P530 Schneider Jesper W., 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P573 Fujii A., 2007, Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '07, P793 VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 MERTON RK, 1957, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V22, P635 Mei Q., 2008, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) with the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT) of the North American Chapter of the ACL, P816 White MD, 2001, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V37, P721 BONZI S, 1982, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V33, P208 Qazvinian V., 2008, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, V2, Suppe F, 1998, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, V65, P381 Huang W., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'12, P1910 Kupiec J., 1995, Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '95, P68 Hodges T. L., 1972, Citation indexing: Its potential for bibliographical control, Glaser BG, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Kataria S., 2011, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Volume Three, IJCAI '11, P2274 Nanba H., 2000, Advances in Classification Research Online, V11, P117 Bradshaw S, 2003, RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, AUG 17-22, 2003, TRONDHEIM, NORWAY, V2769, P499 Ritchie A., 2008, 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Proceedings, P213 Cronin B., 2005, The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards, Marsh EE, 2003, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V59, P647 Angrosh M. A., 2010, Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL'10, P293 He Q., 2011, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '11, P755 CRONIN B, 1981, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V37, P16 Cronin B., 1984, Citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, OPPENHEIM C, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P225 Ritchie A., 2006, Workshop on How Can Computational Linguistics Improve Information Retrieval? CLIIR '06 Proceedings, P25 Garfield E., 1964, Statistical association methods for merchanized documentation. Symposium Proceedings Washington 1964, P189 Pettigrew KE, 2001, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V52, P62 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation Authors: Huang, MH; Huang, WT; Chang, CC; Chen, DZ; Lin, CP Author Full Names: Huang, Mu-Hsuan; Huang, Wei-Tzu; Chang, Cheng-Ching; Chen, Dar-Zen; Lin, Chang-Pin Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1917-1928; 10.1002/asi.23092 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliometric scatter KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY; DISTRIBUTIONS; INDICATORS; SCIENCE; INFORMATION; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT Abstract: Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone. Addresses: [Huang, Mu-Hsuan; Huang, Wei-Tzu; Chang, Cheng-Ching] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Taipei 10764, Taiwan. [Chen, Dar-Zen] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan. [Chen, Dar-Zen] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Ind Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan. [Lin, Chang-Pin] Natl Taiwan Ocean Univ, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, Keelung, Taiwan. E-mail Addresses: mhhuang at ntu.edu.tw; wthuang at umich.edu; findweber at gmail.com; dzchen at ntu.edu.tw; b0195 at mail.ntou.edu.tw Cited Reference Count: 82 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500012 Cited References: Schultz Laura I., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P155 Faba-Perez C, 2003, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V59, P558 Bradford S. C., 1934, Engineering, V137, P86 COLLINS P, 1988, RESEARCH POLICY, V17, P65 Chang Y. W., 2012, Journal of Library and Information Studies, V10, P1 Sampat B. N., 2005, P277 Vickery B. C., 1948, Journal of Documentation, V4, P199 Janczura J., 2012, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, V205, P79 GLANZEL W, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P211 Gordon Avishag, 2010, Critical Studies on Terrorism, V3, P437 Ashton B., 1988, Research Technology Management, V31, P42 Looy B. V., 2003, Scientometrics, V57, P335 Breitzman AF, 2002, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V28, P187 PTMT, 2013, Patent counts by class by year, Lichtenberg F., 2002, Technology and Industry Working Papers, HUBERT JJ, 1977, SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, V4, P441 Pouris A., 2005, Science and Public Policy, V32, P221 Hall B. H., 2000, Economic working paper E00-277, Gay C., 2005, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, V14, P333 Heine MH, 1998, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V54, P303 Van Raan A, 1999, Scientometrics, V45, P419 Kayal AA, 1999, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V46, P127 Deng Guang-Feng, 2012, EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, V39, P6229 Chan LKC, 2001, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, V56, P2431 Banerjee P, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P95 MacRoberts MH, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P435 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P457 Bookstein A., 1993, Scientometrics, V30, P353 Barrios Maite, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P453 Choung JY, 1998, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V45, P357 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 Leimu R, 2005, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V20, P28 Thomas P., 2001, Engineering Management, V13, P9 Den Z., 1999, Financial Analysts Journal, V55, P20 Ohniwa RL, 2004, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V13, P175 BRAAM RR, 1991, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V42, P233 Haupt Reinhard, 2007, RESEARCH POLICY, V36, P387 Katz JS, 1999, JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, V17, P467 POPE A, 1975, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V26, P207 BROOKS TA, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P183 EGGHE L, 1987, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V38, P288 World Intellectual Property Organization, 2011, 2011 World intellectual property indicators, LEIMKUHL.FF, 1967, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V23, P197 NARIN F, 1994, SCIENTOMETRICS4th International Conference on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, in Memory of Derek John de Solla Price (1922-1983), SEP 11-15, 1993, BERLIN, GERMANY, V30, P147 Griliches Z., 1984, R&D patents and productivity, BASU A, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE3RD INTERNATIONAL CONF ON INFORMETRICS : ON THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF BRADFORDS LAW, AUG, 1991, BANGALORE, INDIA, V43, P494 Tamada Schumpeter, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V68, P289 WILSON P, 1995, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V46, P45 Cronin B, 1984, The citation process, Regolini A., 2012, Library Management, V34, P31 Meyer M, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V49, P93 Bensman S. J., 1982, Library Research, V4, P279 Vinkler Peter, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V35, P602 Huang M-H., 2011, Journal of Library and Information Studies, V9, P1 Fischer MM, 2003, ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, V37, P303 Thomas Patrick, 2006, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V15, P145 Hall B. H., 2004, NBER working paper 10901, Rao IKR, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V41, P93 GRILICHES Z, 1990, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V28, P1661 Gambardella A., 2008, CEPR Discussion Papers No. DP6848, VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 Garfield E., 1984, Essays of an Information Scientist, V7, P536 Mishra Paras N., 2010, MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, V15, P91 Stolpe M, 2002, RESEARCH POLICY, V31, P1181 CHEN YS, 1995, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V46, P370 COLEMAN SR, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICS, V27, P75 van Leeuwen TN, 1999, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V25, P489 Yoon B, 2005, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V72, P145 SEGLEN PO, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P628 Hall B. H., 2001, NBER working paper 8494, GROOS OV, 1967, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V18, P46 Weinstock N., 1971, Encyclopedia of library and information science, P16 Weinstein R., 1999, The Licensing Journal, V19, P8 Jena Kamal Lochan, 2012, ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, V30, P103 Atallah Gamal, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P437 Garg K. C., 1992, Scientometrics, V27, P253 Garfield E., 1964, Essay of Information Scientist, V1, P84 BROOKES BC, 1973, LIBRARY TRENDS, V22, P18 Criscuolo Paola, 2008, RESEARCH POLICY, V37, P1892 Jaffe A. B., 1992, NBER working paper 3993, Bessen James, 2008, RESEARCH POLICY, V37, P932 Lanjouw JO, 2004, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, V114, P441 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340546700008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The Temporal Logic of Citation in Chinese Painting Authors: Powers, MJ Author Full Names: Powers, Martin J. Source: ART HISTORY, 37 (4):745-+; SI 10.1111/1467-8365.12113 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SONG Abstract: It is heuristically valuable to distinguish between citation and other forms of repetition, such as copying, imitating, or emulating. The characteristic of citation is simultaneous reference to two or more incompatible styles in open opposition to the unified styles required for replication. This requires the insight that all styles are products of a particular historical moment. Naturalistic styles, then, become just another kind of period style. This essay examines the theory and practice of citation during the Song era and argues that such practices were founded on broader historical theories that identified the engine of historical change as natural, social, and institutional forces rather than the actions of great men or gods. Such theories made it possible to view each historical period as the product of specific historical changes and so one could view period styles, likewise, as pictorial tokens of particular moments in the history of art. Addresses: [Powers, Martin J.] Univ Michigan, Ctr Chinese Studies, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA. Cited Reference Count: 34 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0141-6790 eISSN: 1467-8365 Web of Science Categories: Art Research Areas: Art IDS Number: AN4GW Unique ID: WOS:000340546700008 Cited References: Didi-Huberman Georges, 2002, Oxford Art Journal, V25, P61 Bush Susan, 1971, The Chinese Literati on Painting: Su Shih to Tung Ch'i-Ch'ang, Cahill James, 1994, The Painter's Practice: How Artists Lived and Worked in Traditional China, Harrist RE, 1996, ARTS OF THE SUNG AND YUANInternational Symposium on Arts of the Sung and Yuan / Exhibition Splendors of Imperial China - Treasures from the National-Place-Museum, Taipei, MAY 10-12, 1996, NEW YORK, NY, P147 Kubler George, 1962, The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things, P71 Zhang Yanyuan, 1954, Lidai minghua jiSome T'ang and Pre-T'ang Texts on Chinese Painting, P170 Liu Zongyuan, 1993, Liu Zongyuan sanwen, VI, P23 CREEL HG, 1964, JOURNAL OF ASIAN STUDIES, V23, P155 Ruyu Zhang, 1969, Qunshu kaosuo xuji (further research from the shantang studio), BROWN EAR, 1974, AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, V79, P1063 Rosenthal Jerome, 1955, Journal of the History of Ideas, V16, P151 Ho Wai-kam, 1976, Artists and Traditions, P113 [Anonymous], 1989, Evaluations of Sung Dynasty Painters of Renown: Liu Tao-ch'un's Sung-ch'ao ming-hua p'ing, V1.1v, P17 Powers Martin J., 2013, ART BULLETIN, V95, P312 1982, Su Shi shiji(the collected poems of Su Shi), Creel Herlee G., 1970, The Origins of Statecraft in China: Volume I, The Western Chou Empire, VI, Song Jaeyoon, 2011, TOUNG PAO, V97, P301 [Anonymous], 1983, Art History, V6, P253 Qingzhi Wei, 2007, Shiren yuxieJade Splinters from the Poets, P262 Powers Martin, 2006, Pattern and Person: Ornament, Society, and Self in Classical China, P191 Barnhart Richard, 1976, Artists and Traditions, P51 Bin Wong R., 2012, Comparative Early Modernities, P195 Bloch Marc, 1961, Feudal Society, V2, P446 Chen Liao, 2004, Collected Commentaries on Liu Zongyuan, V1, P25 Cahill James, 2005, Archives of Asian Art, V55, P17 Bol Peter K., 1997, Qingzhu Deng Guangming jiaoshou jiushi huadan lunwenji, P644 Powers Martin J., 2010, Reinventing the Past: Archaism and Antiquarianism in Chinese Art and Visual Culture, P103 Bloom Harold, 1972, Diacritics, V2, P36 Toulmin Stephen, 1965, The Discovery of Time, P104 PIGMAN GW, 1980, RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY, V33, P1 Bourdieu Pierre, 1993, The Field of Cultural Production, P112 [Anonymous], 1989, Evaluations of Sung Dynasty Painters of Renown: Liu Tao-ch'un's Sung-ch'ao ming-hua p'ing, P17 Levy Ellen K., 2009, ART JOURNAL, V68, P88 Bol PK, 2001, HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES, V61, P37 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340520600006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Pain research in Africa: a ten-year bibliometric survey Authors: Onyeka, TC; Chukwuneke, FN Author Full Names: Onyeka, Tonia C.; Chukwuneke, Felix N. Source: JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 28 (4):511-516; 10.1007/s00540-013-1767-5 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Pain research, Africa, Bibliometric survey KeyWords Plus: CLINICAL-RESEARCH; MEDICAL JOURNALS; IMPACT-FACTOR; COUNTRIES; HEALTH; PUBLICATION; QUALITY; BIAS Abstract: Over the years, a trend for very low numbers of scientific publications from Africa has emerged. There has been no evaluation of pain research publications from this region. This study was conducted to determine the African pain research spectrum over the last 10 years, to identify trends in the number of publications from different countries, to identify currently underexplored areas of pain research, and to stimulate renewed interest in quality pain research in Nigeria and Africa. The English- and non-English-language medical literature on pain from July 2002 to May 2012 was studied using Medline, the Ovid database, and by performing hand searches of relevant references using Google. Publications on pain by Africans and/or non-Africans conducted in Africa on Africans living in Africa within the study period were included. The total number of articles per country, publication types, and impact factors of the respective journals were tabulated to determine the quantity and quality of research in this field. Two hundred twenty-eight (228) articles from 25 African countries that were published in 129 different journals were identified. The majority were epidemiological studies (43.9 %), experimental studies (20.2 %), randomized controlled trials (2.2 %), and systematic reviews (1.8 %). Nigeria, South Africa, and Uganda topped the list of the most-published articles, with 76 (33.3 %), 71 (31.1 %), and 12 (5.3 %), respectively. The total number of journals with impact factors was 81, of which 29 were high-impact-factor journals. Pain research publications from Africa should be encouraged. Given the underexplored frontiers of pain research, there is a need to engage in rigorous research in this field to enhance the contribution of the African continent ("the African Voice") to worldwide advances in this respect. Addresses: [Onyeka, Tonia C.] UNTH, Dept Anaesthesia, Pain & Palliat Care Unit, Ituku Ozalla, Nigeria. [Chukwuneke, Felix N.] Univ Nigeria Teaching Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ituku Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria. E-mail Addresses: doctortoniaonyeka at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER JAPAN KK, CHIYODA FIRST BLDG EAST, 3-8-1 NISHI-KANDA, CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO, 101-0065, JAPAN ISSN: 0913-8668 eISSN: 1438-8359 Web of Science Categories: Anesthesiology Research Areas: Anesthesiology IDS Number: AN3WY Unique ID: WOS:000340520600006 Cited References: Uthman Olalekan A., 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, V6, Aboulghar Mohamed, 2011, FERTILITY AND STERILITY, V96, P805 Certain E, 2003, M?decine tropicale : revue du Corps de sant? colonial, V63, P627 Harding R, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1971 Rohra Dileep K., 2011, BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, V11, O'Connor S. J., 2012, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, V21, P701 De la Croix D, 2009, Econ Gov., V10, P187 Tao Tianzhu, 2012, CRITICAL CARE, V16, Atani M, 2007, S Afr Fam Pract., V49, P4 Siegfried Nandi, 2006, SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, V96, P533 Schubert C, 2009, Nat Med., V15, P715 Muula Adamson S., 2008, CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, V49, P681 Osayande O, 2012, Lib Phil Prac, Alem A, 2003, BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, V182, P185 Michalopoulos A, 2005, CHEST, V128, P3993 Olumide HB, 2012, Afr J Bus Manage., V6, P2421 Uthman OA, 2009, Pan Afr Med J, V1, Hofman Karen J., 2009, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V97, P44 Soyannwo OA, 2009, IASP Pain, V17, Volmink J, 2005, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V331, P705 Laabes Emmanuel Philip, 2011, TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, V16, P258 Freeman Phyllis, 2006, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, V27, P196 Benner Rebecca S., 2012, OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, V119, P3 Goehl Thomas J., 2008, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, V116, PA514 Smart P, 2005, Afr Today, V52, P39 Saha S, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V91, P42 Sumathipala A, 2004, BMC Med Ethics, V5, P5 DUMONT JE, 1989, TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, V14, P327 Tijssen Robert J. W., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V71, P303 Rahman M, 2003, PUBLIC HEALTH, V117, P274 Kirigia Joses M., 2011, BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS, V11, Anijaobi-Idem FN, 2012, J Res Peace Gender Dev., V2, P171 Tanya T, 2005, Environ Health Perspect., V113, PA452 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340422700008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Linked-Data-Driven and Semantically-Enabled Journal Portal for Scientometrics Authors: Hu, Y; Janowicz, K; McKenzie, G; Sengupta, K; Hitzler, P Author Full Names: Hu, Yingjie; Janowicz, Krzysztof; McKenzie, Grant; Sengupta, Kunal; Hitzler, Pascal Edited by: Alani H; Kagal L; Fokoue A; Groth P; Biemann C; Parreira JX; Aroyo L; Noy N; Welty C; Janowicz K Source: SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2013, PART II, 8219 114-129; 2013 Book Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 12th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) Conference Date: OCT 21-25, 2013 Conference Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA Conference Sponsors: Bing, Fluid Operat, Microsoft Res, PreviousNext, IBM Res, Ontotext, Yahoo, IOS Press, OpenLink Software KeyWords Plus: INDEX; WEB Abstract: The Semantic Web journal by IOS Press follows a unique open and transparent process during which each submitted manuscript is available online together with the full history of its successive decision statuses, assigned editors, solicited and voluntary reviewers, their full text reviews, and in many cases also the authors' response letters. Combined with a highly-customized, Drupal-based journal management system, this provides the journal with semantically rich manuscript time lines and networked data about authors, reviewers, and editors. These data are now exposed using a SPARQL endpoint, an extended Bibo ontology, and a modular Linked Data portal that provides interactive scientometrics based on established and new analysis methods. The portal can be customized for other journals as well. Addresses: [Hu, Yingjie; Janowicz, Krzysztof; McKenzie, Grant] Univ Calif, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA. Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 0302-9743 ISBN: 978-3-642-41338-4; 978-3-642-41337-7 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods Research Areas: Computer Science IDS Number: BB0MJ Unique ID: WOS:000340422700008 Cited References: Glenisson P, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1548 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 D'Arcus B., 2009, Bibliographic Ontology Specification, Hitzler P., 2013, Semantic Web, V4, P117 Hood WW, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V52, P291 Kessler C., 2012, GIScience 2012, V7478, P102 Tang J., 2008, Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P990 Stadler C., 2012, Semantic Web, V3, P333 Brody T., 2007, CTWatch Quarterly, V3, Shotton David, 2009, PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, V5, Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P547 Auer Soeren, 2007, SEMANTIC WEB, PROCEEDINGS6th International Semantic Web Conference/2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007/ASWC 2007), NOV 11-15, 2007, Busan, SOUTH KOREA, V4825, P722 Braun Tibor, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P169 Zhou D., 2006, Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P248 Janowicz Krzysztof, 2012, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V25, P48 Wang X., 2006, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P424 Blei DM, 2003, JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH18th International Conference on Machine Learning, JUN 28-JUL 01, 2001, WILLIAMSTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, V3, P993 =================================================================== -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From riorma at GMAIL.COM Fri Sep 12 08:08:28 2014 From: riorma at GMAIL.COM (=?UTF-8?Q?Enrique_Ordu=C3=B1a?=) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:08:28 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear Stephen, Thank you very much again for your interesting email, it helps us to debate and discuss in a very concentrated form. As regards Barabasi and Albert studies (and Broder, Baeza-Yates and many other colleagues), we have certainly learned a lot from them. However, I think they are located in another analysis context, as they are intended to measure the network, and we just the database (which obviously harvest the net, but filtering contents). Therefore, our aim was to count the number of bibliographic records that Google Scholar. That is, Google Scholar is an academic search engine, but also a bibliographical database. And that amount (and its evolution) gives us much information. In addition, a record in Google Scholar database does not always correspond to an online digital object (a node the academic network), since many records are mere citations that do not lead to any website. In any case, unless this point, which is determined by simply have different research interests, I think we agree in fact about what is a defined or undefined universe of information. Let us recommend you the following presentation: http://es.slideshare.net/torressalinas/the-google-scholar-family-is-it-an-alternative-for-the-evaluation-of-science In addition, Google Scholar is able to measure not only scientific impact, but the professional and social impact of people, something that neither WoS nor Scopus do, and that certainly explains the high values in the performance of economists and other researchers in social sciences and humanities. We therefore believe that it is interesting to know the size of Google Scholar, also measured in this way. And it seems we are not the only ones to be concerned about this. We recommend the following work performed by Khabsa & Giles (2014), which certainly enlightened us on our way. Khabsa & Giles (2014). ?The number of scholarly documents on the public web. Plos One, 9(5): e93949.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093949 As regards Google Scholar?s opacity, while we agree that it is a company and Google can do whatever they want with their products, we should remind that the bibliographic records that Google Scholar catalogs and provides access to are harvested in most from public entities (such as institutional repositories from public universities). A little consideration with those institutions that nurture for free its database would be appreciated, ?for example an API to be used for academic purposes. But this is a personal appreciation. And of course we can learn a lot from each other. We will be happy to read your work and communicate you our ideas and suggestions and / or vice versa. We are in contact. Kind regards, Enrique Ordu?a-Malea & Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Fri Sep 12 09:55:21 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:55:21 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Enrique and Emilio, Thank you for the thoughtful e-mail. I have downloaded the Khabsa and Giles article and will look at your presentation (I hope there is an English version). I am in the final stages of finishing what I think may be a major article and will incorporate your suggestions as much as possible. I will be posting this article or working paper on arXiv soon and would like you to look it over before submission to a major journal. We are at the cutting edge, where vested interests are threatened and disagreements deep, and it is necessary to see the objections and know how to counter them. I do not think that it is the physical size of the GS universe that is important but its structure. PageRank is nothing but a further development of Garfield?s theory of citation indexing and what is important and fascinating here is that relevant sets are semantically defined not by words but by linkages. This leads to something of a tautology in reasoning, because what emerges as relevant from linkages has to be defined again in words to be communicated. Moreover, WWW structure is in the power-law or Lotkaian domain, and therefore linkages to sites are highly skewed with few sites having most linkages. This results in two things: 1) the so-called ?diameter? of the universe is very small in that it takes very few jumps to cross it; and 2) your probability of landing on an important, relevant site are much higher than landing on an unimportant, irrelevant one. Size can increase exponentially with little effect on this. This comprises the telemetry of PageRank, guiding it to its targets. What works against this telemetry is the chaos governing the WWW due to its lack of authority structure. Therefore, you need what you seem to be calling an ?API? to edit and control your data, the best of which now is Harzing?s. I am an enhance cataloger certified by the Library of Congress, and our biggest concern is authority structure, so I know its importance. Boy!? I have really gone out on a limb here, and somebody may saw it off. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 7:08 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear Stephen, Thank you very much again for your interesting email, it helps us to debate and discuss in a very concentrated form. As regards Barabasi and Albert studies (and Broder, Baeza-Yates and many other colleagues), we have certainly learned a lot from them. However, I think they are located in another analysis context, as they are intended to measure the network, and we just the database (which obviously harvest the net, but filtering contents). Therefore, our aim was to count the number of bibliographic records that Google Scholar. That is, Google Scholar is an academic search engine, but also a bibliographical database. And that amount (and its evolution) gives us much information. In addition, a record in Google Scholar database does not always correspond to an online digital object (a node the academic network), since many records are mere citations that do not lead to any website. In any case, unless this point, which is determined by simply have different research interests, I think we agree in fact about what is a defined or undefined universe of information. Let us recommend you the following presentation: http://es.slideshare.net/torressalinas/the-google-scholar-family-is-it-an-alternative-for-the-evaluation-of-science In addition, Google Scholar is able to measure not only scientific impact, but the professional and social impact of people, something that neither WoS nor Scopus do, and that certainly explains the high values in the performance of economists and other researchers in social sciences and humanities. We therefore believe that it is interesting to know the size of Google Scholar, also measured in this way. And it seems we are not the only ones to be concerned about this. We recommend the following work performed by Khabsa & Giles (2014), which certainly enlightened us on our way. Khabsa & Giles (2014). ?The number of scholarly documents on the public web. Plos One, 9(5): e93949.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093949 As regards Google Scholar?s opacity, while we agree that it is a company and Google can do whatever they want with their products, we should remind that the bibliographic records that Google Scholar catalogs and provides access to are harvested in most from public entities (such as institutional repositories from public universities). A little consideration with those institutions that nurture for free its database would be appreciated, ?for example an API to be used for academic purposes. But this is a personal appreciation. And of course we can learn a lot from each other. We will be happy to read your work and communicate you our ideas and suggestions and / or vice versa. We are in contact. Kind regards, Enrique Ordu?a-Malea & Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Fri Sep 12 10:05:28 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:05:28 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: William, What are often denounced as ?clutter? in GS citations are actually ?altmetric? measurements. Steve B. From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of William Gunn Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:56 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Stephen J Bensman > wrote: you began to see the importance of repositories and other methods of dissemination. Indeed you do. This is where I think #altmetrics shows promise. Best, -- William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Sun Sep 14 16:24:07 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:24:07 -0400 Subject: The Open Access Citation Advantage Message-ID: A CSIR-NISCAIR (India) study by Prathap (2014) compared OA and non-OA by comparing journal impact factors for 13 Indian journals betore and after they converted to Gold OA (2004-2014) and found no difference. Comparing journal impact factors before and after conversion to OA are not the best way to test the OA citation advantage, which should be tested at the individual article level, within journals, for OA and non-OA articles published at the same time. Many things change across time. Prathap cites the work of Davis who in turn cites the RIN study and the Nature Blog article about the OA citation (and download) advantage. The RIN within-journal study found a small citation advantage for paid hybrid Gold OA *Nature Communications* articles compared to non-OA Nature Communications articles 2010-2014. Phil Davis cited an error in the RIN study -- OA and non-OA may have been mixed up ? and re-iterated his preferred hypothesis that the OA citation advantage is a self-selection artifact (but also suggested that because of the RIN error, the actual OA citation advantage, though a self-selection artifact, might be much bigger!). I have not since heard an official confirmation or correction of any error by RIN or Nature. As to the self-selection hypothesis, I tried to post a commentary on the Nature Blog where the RIN study was discussed by Ellen Collins of RIN (but I?m not sure whether it will appear: the software never acknowledged getting it, and I posted twice): The RIN study did not compare non-OA vs. OA in general but non-OA versus hybrid Gold OA in particular (hence a self-selected decision as to whether or not to pay for hybrid Gold OA). I pointed out that our 2010 within-journal OA/non-OA comparison (Gargouri et al ) had shown ? for individual articles, with a far larger sample, across all journals and disciplines, and for unpaid Green OA self-archiving rather than for hybrid Gold OA payment ? that there is an OA citation advantage of the same size regardless of whether the (Green) OA is self-selected or mandatory. Most of the OA advantage studies either compare on too short a time period (too early for the OA advantage to be detectable) or they average across too long a time period in which the *timing of the OA itself *is unknown. The timing of OA is important, however, because some publishers embargo OA for a year, and late access may never make up the lost access . Future repository-based studies, where the date on which the paper is made OA can be determined, relative to the paper?s acceptance data and publication date), will allow OA timing to be controlled better. Timing (as David Hume would agree) is crucial to inferring causality (even if it cannot ?prove? it). Meanwhile, I?d say that it still remains most likely that there is indeed a significant OA citation advantage, and that the advantage is causal, not just an artifactual side-effect of author self-selection. Ditto for the even bigger OA download advantage (and the two effects are unlikely to be unconnected!). Stevan Harnad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From krichel at OPENLIB.ORG Mon Sep 15 00:22:50 2014 From: krichel at OPENLIB.ORG (Thomas Krichel) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:22:50 +0000 Subject: announcing OAI9 in Geneva 17-19 June 2015 Message-ID: The CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9) University of Geneva June 17th-19th 2015 This series of Workshops in Geneva has become the major community event in Europe in the year in which it is held. For these three days, librarians, IT professionals, publishers and researchers come together to network, hear presentations from keynote speakers, attend tutorials on cutting-edge themes, and congtribute their ideas through breakout/technical sessions and poster displays. The workshop is designed to provide a focus for the interchange of ideas, the building of new partnerships, the annoucement of new developments and the celebration of success in innovation in the whole scholarly communications process. The workshop will be held in the University of Geneva at the Institute of Graduate Studies and Campus Biotech. Both locations are close to each other and easily accessible on the Geneva tram network. The Programme Committee is currently drawing up an innovative programme for the meeting. Please reserve the dates for OAI9 in your diaries now. Keep an eye on the Workshop website at http://indico.cern.ch/e/oai9, which also lists the Twitter feed and hashtag for the meeting. On behalf of the OAI9 Programme Committee, I look forward to seeing you in the University of Geneva to hear news of current developments in scholarly communication. Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel skype:thomaskrichel From s.de.rijcke at CWTS.LEIDENUNIV.NL Mon Sep 15 10:11:28 2014 From: s.de.rijcke at CWTS.LEIDENUNIV.NL (Rijcke, S. de) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:11:28 +0000 Subject: The Leiden manifesto in the making: proposal of a set of principles on the use of assessment metrics in the S&T indicators conference 2014 In-Reply-To: <5405BF56.90104@indiana.edu> Message-ID: Summary A set of guiding principles (a manifesto) on the use of quantitative metrics in research assessment was proposed by Diana Hicks (Georgia Tech) during a panel session on quality standards for S&T indicators at the STI conference in Leiden last week. Various participants in the debate agreed on the responsibility of the scientometric community in better supporting use of scientometrics. Finding the choice of specific indicators too constraining, many voices supported the idea of a joint publication of a set of principles which should guide a responsible use of quantitative metrics. The session also included calls for scientometricians to take a more proactive role as engaged and responsible stakeholders in the development and monitoring of metrics for research assessment, as well as in wider debates on data governance of, such as infrastructure and ownership. In the closure of the conference, the association of scientometric institutes ENID (European Network of Indicators Designers) and Ton van Raan as president, offered to play a coordinating role in writing up and publishing a consensus version of the manifesto. Full report of the plenary session at the 2014 STI conference in Leiden on Quality standards for evaluation: Any chance of a dream come true? Ismael Rafols (Ingenio (CSIC-UPV) & SPRU (Sussex); Session chair) Sarah de Rijcke (CWTS, Leiden University) Paul Wouters (CWTS, Leiden University) The need to debate these issues has come to the forefront in light of reports that uses of certain easy-to-use and potentially misleading metrics for evaluative purposes have become a routine part of academic life, despite misgivings within the profession itself about its validity. A central aim of the special session was to discuss the need for a concerted response from the scientometric community to produce more explicit guidelines and expert advice on good scientometric practices. The session continued from the 2013 ISSI and STI conferences in Vienna and Berlin, where full plenary sessions were convened on the need for standards in evaluative bibliometrics, and the ethical and policy implications of individual-level bibliometrics. This year?s plenary session started with a summary by Ludo Waltman (CWTS) of the pre-conference workshop on technical aspects of advanced bibliometric indicators. The workshop, co-organised by Ludo, was attended by some 25 participants, and topics that were addressed included 1. Advanced bibliometric indicators (strengths and weaknesses of different types of indicators; field normalization; country-level and institutional-level comparisons); 2. Statistical inference in bibliometric analysis; and 3. Journal impact metrics (strenghts and weaknessess of different journal impact metrics; use of the metrics in the assessment of individual researchers). The workshop discussions were very fruitful and some common ground was found, but that there also remained significant differences in opinion. Some topics that need further discussion are technical and mathematical properties of indicators (e.g., ranking consistency); strong correlations between indicators; the need to distinguish between technical issues and usage issues; purely descriptive approaches vs. statistical approaches, and the importance of user perspectives for technical aspects of indicator production. There was a clear interest in continuing these discussions at a next conference. The slides of the workshop are available on request. Ludo?s summary was followed by a short talk by Sarah de Rijcke (CWTS), to set the scene for the ensuing panel discussion. Sarah provided an historical explanation for why previous responses by the scientometric community about misuses of performance metrics and the need for standards have landed in deaf ears. Evoking Paul Wouters? and Peter Dahler-Larsen?s introductory and keynote lectures, she argued that the preferred normative position of scientometrics (?We measure, you decide?) and the tendency to provide upstream solutions no longer serve the double role of the field very well. As an academic as well as a regulatory discipline, scientometrics not only creates reliable knowledge on metrics, but also produces social technologies for research governance. As such, evaluative metrics attain meaning in a certain context, and they also help shape that context. Though parts of the community now acknowledge that there is indeed a ?social? problem, ethical issues are often either conveniently bracketed off or ascribed to ?users lacking knowledge?. This reveals unease with taking any other-than-technical responsibility. Sarah plugged the idea of a short joint statement on proper uses of evaluative metrics, proposed at the international workshop at OST in Paris (12 May 2014; http://bit.ly/YsST6Y). She concluded with a plea for a more long-term reconsideration of the field?s normative position. If the world of research governance is indeed a collective responsibility, then scientometrics should step up and accept its part. This would put the community in a much better position to actually engage productively with stakeholders in the process of developing good practices. In the ensuing panel discussion, Stephen Curry (professor of Structural Biology at Imperial College, London, and member of HEFCE steering group) expressed a deep concern about the seducing power of metrics in research assessment and saw a shared, collective responsibility for the creation and use of metrics on the side of bibliometricians, researchers and publishers alike. Thus according to him technical and usage aspects of indicators should not be separated artificially. Lisa Colledge (representing Elsevier as Snowballmetrics project director) talked about the Snowballmetrics initiative, and presented it as a bottom-up and practical approach with the goal to meet the needs of funding organizations and university senior level management. According to Lisa, while it primarily addresses research officers, feedback from the academic community of bibliometrics is highly appreciated to contribute to the empowerment of indicator users. Stephanie Haustein (University of Montreal) was not convinced that social media metrics (a.k.a. altmetrics) lend itself to standardization due to heterogeneity of data sources (tweets, views, downloads) and their constantly changing nature. She stated that meaning of altmetrics data is highly ambiguous (attention vs. significance) and a quality control similar to the peer review system in scientific publications does not yet exist. Jonathan Adams (Chief scientist at Digital Science) approved the idea of setting up a statement but emphasized that it would have to be short, precise and clear to also catch the attention of government bodies, funding agencies and senior level university management who are uninterested in technical details. Standards will have to live up to the fast-paced change (data availability, technological innovations). He was critical of any fixed set of indicators since this would not accommodate the strategic interests of every organisation. Diana Hicks (Georgia Institute of Technology) presented a first draft of a set of statements (the "Leiden Manifesto"), which she proposed should be published in a top-tier journal like Nature or Science. The statements are general principles on how scientometric indicators should be used, such as for example, 'Metrics properly used support assessments; they do not substitute for judgment' or 'Metrics should align with strategic goals'. In the ensuing debate, many participants in the audience proposed initiatives and problems that need to be solved. They were partially summarised by Paul Wouters who identified four issues around which the debate evolved. First, he proposed that a central issue is the connection between assessment procedures and the primary process of knowledge creation. If this connection is severed, assessments lose part of their usefulness for researchers and scholars. The second question is what kind of standards are desirable. Who sets them? How open are they to new developments and different stakeholders? How comprehensive and transparent are or should standards be? What interests and assumptions are included within them? In the debate it became clear that scientometricians do not want to determine the standards themselves. Yet standards are being developed by database providers and universities, now busy building up new research information systems. Wouters proposed that the scientometric community sets as its goal to monitor and analyse evolving standards. This could help to better understand problems and pitfalls and also provide technical documentation. The third issue highlighted by Wouters is the question of who is responsible. While the scientometric community cannot assume full responsibility for all evaluations in which scientometric data and indicators play a role, it can certainly broaden out its agenda. Perhaps an even more fundamental question is how public stakeholders can remain in control of the responsibility for publicly funded science when more and more meta-data is being privatized. Wouters pleaded for strengthening the public nature of the infrastructure of meta-data, including current research information systems, publication databases and citation indexes. This view does not deny the important role for for-profit companies who are often more innovative. Fourth, Wouters suggested that taking these issues together provides an inspiring collective research agenda for the scientometrics community. Diana Hicks? suggestion of a manifesto or set of principles was followed up on the second day of the STI conference at the annual meeting of ENID (European Network of Indicators Designers). The ENID assembly, and Ton van Raan as president, offered to play a coordinating role in writing up the statement. Diana Hicks? draft will serve as a basis, and it will also be informed by opinions from the community, important stakeholders and intermediary organisations, as well as those affected by evaluations. The debate on standardization and use will be continued in upcoming science policy conferences, with a session confirmed for the AAAS (San Jos?, February) and expected sessions in the STI and ISSI conferences in 2015. (Thanks to Sabrina Petersohn for sharing her notes of the debate.) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Tue Sep 16 09:30:47 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:30:47 -0400 Subject: Algorithmic Almanacs: Lots, Bots and Nots Message-ID: ?*The world's most prolific writer: Sverker Johansson has created more than three million Wikipedia articles, around one tenth of the entire content of the site. How, and why, does he do it?*? -- Norwegian Inflight Magazine ] The question's interesting, though the right description is not that Sverker Johansson ?wrote? millions of Wikipedia articles but that he wrote an online search algorithm (a ?bot") that generated them automatically (otherwise the writer of a payroll algorithm would be the ?author" of gazillions of paychecks?). How and why indeed! It?s interesting, though, that so many Wikipedia entries can be generated algorithmically. The boundary between an encyclopedia and an almanac or even a chronicle of events has long been blurred by Wikipedia. But it is a good idea to keep in mind that what is easy to generate algorithmically (and via its close cousin, *crowdsourcing*) in the googlized digital era, is simple or 1st-order facts: Answers to what/when/where questions: Apples are red, the sky is blue, it rained in Burma on Tuesday, Arsenal beat Manchester United 4-1.. The real source of all this factual information is Google?s global digital database, and the fact that Google has reverse-indexed it all, making it searchable by Boolean (and/or/not) search algorithms as well as by more complex computational (Turing) algorithms. The questions that it?s much harder to answer algorithmically, even with all of the Google database and all the Boolean/Turing tools, are the higher-order how/why questions. If those could all be answered algorithmically, most of theoretical (i.e., non-experimental) science would be finished by now. And the reason for that is probably that our brains don?t find all those how/why answers just algorithmically either, but also via dynamical (analog, sensorimotor) means that may prove accessible to future Turing-Test scale *sensorimotor robots*, but certainly not to today's purely *symbolic bots*, operating on purely symbolic databases. In other words, it?s down to the symbol grounding problem again? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM Thu Sep 18 01:54:55 2014 From: anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM (anup kumar das) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:24:55 +0530 Subject: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Research Communicators [for your comments] Message-ID: *The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Research Communicators * 1. Create your unique author ID, an identifier for global researchers engaged in academic research. 2. Create your own researcher profile in a dedicated website or personalized webpage and provide up-to-date information about your scholarly research works. 3. Create a researcher profile in academic social networks. 4. Share your published works in OA repositories, and also in academic social networks. 5. Create your profile in Google Scholar Citations and regularly track citations of your published papers. 6. Participate in email-based discussion forums in your specialized area and discuss your research ideas or works in progress. 7. Make use of free online citation and reference managers. *Excerpted from: * Das, Anup Kumar (2014). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Research Communicators. In G. Maity et. al. (Eds.), *Charaibeti: Golden Jubilee Commemorative Volume* (pp. 356-365). Kolkata: Department of Library & Information Science, Jadavpur University. ISBN: 9788192988603. Download Full-text PDF: http://eprints.rclis.org/23765/ *Abstract*: The emergence of Web 2.0 and simultaneously Library 2.0 platforms has helped the library and information professionals to outreach to new audiences beyond their physical boundaries. In a globalized society, information becomes very useful resource for socio-economic empowerment of marginalized communities, economic prosperity of common citizens, and knowledge enrichment of liberated minds. Scholarly information becomes both developmental and functional for researchers working towards advancement of knowledge. We must recognize a relay of information flow and information ecology while pursuing scholarly research. Published scholarly literatures we consult that help us in creation of new knowledge. Similarly, our published scholarly works should be outreached to future researchers for regeneration of next dimension of knowledge. Fortunately, present day research communicators have many freely available personalized digital tools to outreach to globalized research audiences having similar research interests. These tools and techniques, already adopted by many researchers in different subject areas across the world, should be enthusiastically utilized by LIS researchers in South Asia for global dissemination of their scholarly research works. This newly found enthusiasm will soon become integral part of the positive habits and cultural practices of research communicators in LIS domain. [Apologies for cross-postings] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET Thu Sep 18 02:14:49 2014 From: loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET (Loet Leydesdorff) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:14:49 +0200 Subject: The Generation of Large Networks from Web-of-Science Data; preprint version Message-ID: The Generation of Large Networks from Web-of-Science Data Loet Leydesdorff, Gohar Feroz Khan, and Lutz Bornmann During the 1990s, one of us developed a series of freeware routines (http://www.leydesdorff.net/indicators) that enable the user to organize downloads from the Web-of-Science (Thomson Reuters) into a relational database, and then to export matrices for further analysis in various formats (for example, for co-author analysis). The basic format of the matrices displays each document as a case in a row that can be attributed different variables in the columns. One limitation to this approach was hitherto that relational databases typically have an upper limit for the number of variables, such as 256 or 1024. In this brief communication, we report on a way to circumvent this limitation by using txt2Pajek.exe, available as freeware from http://www.pfeffer.at/txt2pajek/. (Submitted on 17 Sep 2014; available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.4898) . apologies for cross-postings. _____ Loet Leydesdorff University of Amsterdam Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR) loet at leydesdorff.net ; http://www.leydesdorff.net/ Honorary Professor, SPRU, University of Sussex; Guest Professor Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou; Visiting Professor, ISTIC, Beijing; Visiting Professor, Birkbeck, University of London; http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYAAAAJ&hl=en -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From H.Moed at ELSEVIER.COM Thu Sep 18 03:54:42 2014 From: H.Moed at ELSEVIER.COM (Moed, Henk (ELS-AMS)) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:54:42 +0000 Subject: The Leiden manifesto in the making: proposal of a set of principles on the use of assessment metrics in the S&T indicators conference 2014 In-Reply-To: <5C019A47-386B-4984-A494-DFD1197CB3E2@cwts.leidenuniv.nl> Message-ID: Publishing a manifesto on the use of metrics in research assessment is an excellent idea, as it summarizes for a large audience of users and producers of metrics and for all those who are subjected to assessment, base principles of appropriate use, based on experiences and insights collected and published during the past decades. But the responsibility of the metrics research community goes beyond publishing manifesti. A principal task of our community, which is rather open - as many inventors of new indicators do not attend our specialized conferences -, is developing valid and useful metrics and research assessment methodologies. The strong critique of the DORA Initiative on a particular type of use of journal impact factors, one of the motivations of the proposed metrics manifesto, makes us once more aware of the need to develop more appropriate metric-based tools for assessing research performance especially though not exclusively at the level of individuals and groups, and contribute to their embedment into a broader concept of multi-dimensional assessment. I wish to defend the position that the metrics research community should take the lead in developing - designing, testing, evaluating - such tools, including transparent features of data verification, flexible benchmarking and self-assessment. This development should take place independently of the big data providers, funders and politicians, applying rigorous quality standards, in close interaction with the scientific-scholarly community. Acquiring sufficient funding to carry out this task is a major challenge. Also, we should play an initiating role in making such tools easily accessible (not necessarily for free) for the research community as a whole. Easy accessibility is also a necessary condition for establishing valid, fair and broadly accepted standards in metrics-based assessment. Our relationship with the Big Data Industries may need to be re-invented, and possibly grow towards a covenant between international organizations of universities, funding councils and big data providers. These issues deserve as much attention as a manifesto on metrics use in research assessment. Henk F. Moed Visiting professor, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. Former professor of research assessment methodologies at Leiden University, and former senior scientific advisor at Elsevier. From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rijcke, S. de Sent: maandag 15 september 2014 16:11 To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] The Leiden manifesto in the making: proposal of a set of principles on the use of assessment metrics in the S&T indicators conference 2014 Summary A set of guiding principles (a manifesto) on the use of quantitative metrics in research assessment was proposed by Diana Hicks (Georgia Tech) during a panel session on quality standards for S&T indicators at the STI conference in Leiden last week. Various participants in the debate agreed on the responsibility of the scientometric community in better supporting use of scientometrics. Finding the choice of specific indicators too constraining, many voices supported the idea of a joint publication of a set of principles which should guide a responsible use of quantitative metrics. The session also included calls for scientometricians to take a more proactive role as engaged and responsible stakeholders in the development and monitoring of metrics for research assessment, as well as in wider debates on data governance of, such as infrastructure and ownership. In the closure of the conference, the association of scientometric institutes ENID (European Network of Indicators Designers) and Ton van Raan as president, offered to play a coordinating role in writing up and publishing a consensus version of the manifesto. Full report of the plenary session at the 2014 STI conference in Leiden on Quality standards for evaluation: Any chance of a dream come true? Ismael Rafols (Ingenio (CSIC-UPV) & SPRU (Sussex); Session chair) Sarah de Rijcke (CWTS, Leiden University) Paul Wouters (CWTS, Leiden University) The need to debate these issues has come to the forefront in light of reports that uses of certain easy-to-use and potentially misleading metrics for evaluative purposes have become a routine part of academic life, despite misgivings within the profession itself about its validity. A central aim of the special session was to discuss the need for a concerted response from the scientometric community to produce more explicit guidelines and expert advice on good scientometric practices. The session continued from the 2013 ISSI and STI conferences in Vienna and Berlin, where full plenary sessions were convened on the need for standards in evaluative bibliometrics, and the ethical and policy implications of individual-level bibliometrics. This year's plenary session started with a summary by Ludo Waltman (CWTS) of the pre-conference workshop on technical aspects of advanced bibliometric indicators. The workshop, co-organised by Ludo, was attended by some 25 participants, and topics that were addressed included 1. Advanced bibliometric indicators (strengths and weaknesses of different types of indicators; field normalization; country-level and institutional-level comparisons); 2. Statistical inference in bibliometric analysis; and 3. Journal impact metrics (strenghts and weaknessess of different journal impact metrics; use of the metrics in the assessment of individual researchers). The workshop discussions were very fruitful and some common ground was found, but that there also remained significant differences in opinion. Some topics that need further discussion are technical and mathematical properties of indicators (e.g., ranking consistency); strong correlations between indicators; the need to distinguish between technical issues and usage issues; purely descriptive approaches vs. statistical approaches, and the importance of user perspectives for technical aspects of indicator production. There was a clear interest in continuing these discussions at a next conference. The slides of the workshop are available on request. Ludo's summary was followed by a short talk by Sarah de Rijcke (CWTS), to set the scene for the ensuing panel discussion. Sarah provided an historical explanation for why previous responses by the scientometric community about misuses of performance metrics and the need for standards have landed in deaf ears. Evoking Paul Wouters' and Peter Dahler-Larsen's introductory and keynote lectures, she argued that the preferred normative position of scientometrics ('We measure, you decide') and the tendency to provide upstream solutions no longer serve the double role of the field very well. As an academic as well as a regulatory discipline, scientometrics not only creates reliable knowledge on metrics, but also produces social technologies for research governance. As such, evaluative metrics attain meaning in a certain context, and they also help shape that context. Though parts of the community now acknowledge that there is indeed a 'social' problem, ethical issues are often either conveniently bracketed off or ascribed to 'users lacking knowledge'. This reveals unease with taking any other-than-technical responsibility. Sarah plugged the idea of a short joint statement on proper uses of evaluative metrics, proposed at the international workshop at OST in Paris (12 May 2014; http://bit.ly/YsST6Y). She concluded with a plea for a more long-term reconsideration of the field's normative position. If the world of research governance is indeed a collective responsibility, then scientometrics should step up and accept its part. This would put the community in a much better position to actually engage productively with stakeholders in the process of developing good practices. In the ensuing panel discussion, Stephen Curry (professor of Structural Biology at Imperial College, London, and member of HEFCE steering group) expressed a deep concern about the seducing power of metrics in research assessment and saw a shared, collective responsibility for the creation and use of metrics on the side of bibliometricians, researchers and publishers alike. Thus according to him technical and usage aspects of indicators should not be separated artificially. Lisa Colledge (representing Elsevier as Snowballmetrics project director) talked about the Snowballmetrics initiative, and presented it as a bottom-up and practical approach with the goal to meet the needs of funding organizations and university senior level management. According to Lisa, while it primarily addresses research officers, feedback from the academic community of bibliometrics is highly appreciated to contribute to the empowerment of indicator users. Stephanie Haustein (University of Montreal) was not convinced that social media metrics (a.k.a. altmetrics) lend itself to standardization due to heterogeneity of data sources (tweets, views, downloads) and their constantly changing nature. She stated that meaning of altmetrics data is highly ambiguous (attention vs. significance) and a quality control similar to the peer review system in scientific publications does not yet exist. Jonathan Adams (Chief scientist at Digital Science) approved the idea of setting up a statement but emphasized that it would have to be short, precise and clear to also catch the attention of government bodies, funding agencies and senior level university management who are uninterested in technical details. Standards will have to live up to the fast-paced change (data availability, technological innovations). He was critical of any fixed set of indicators since this would not accommodate the strategic interests of every organisation. Diana Hicks (Georgia Institute of Technology) presented a first draft of a set of statements (the "Leiden Manifesto"), which she proposed should be published in a top-tier journal like Nature or Science. The statements are general principles on how scientometric indicators should be used, such as for example, 'Metrics properly used support assessments; they do not substitute for judgment' or 'Metrics should align with strategic goals'. In the ensuing debate, many participants in the audience proposed initiatives and problems that need to be solved. They were partially summarised by Paul Wouters who identified four issues around which the debate evolved. First, he proposed that a central issue is the connection between assessment procedures and the primary process of knowledge creation. If this connection is severed, assessments lose part of their usefulness for researchers and scholars. The second question is what kind of standards are desirable. Who sets them? How open are they to new developments and different stakeholders? How comprehensive and transparent are or should standards be? What interests and assumptions are included within them? In the debate it became clear that scientometricians do not want to determine the standards themselves. Yet standards are being developed by database providers and universities, now busy building up new research information systems. Wouters proposed that the scientometric community sets as its goal to monitor and analyse evolving standards. This could help to better understand problems and pitfalls and also provide technical documentation. The third issue highlighted by Wouters is the question of who is responsible. While the scientometric community cannot assume full responsibility for all evaluations in which scientometric data and indicators play a role, it can certainly broaden out its agenda. Perhaps an even more fundamental question is how public stakeholders can remain in control of the responsibility for publicly funded science when more and more meta-data is being privatized. Wouters pleaded for strengthening the public nature of the infrastructure of meta-data, including current research information systems, publication databases and citation indexes. This view does not deny the important role for for-profit companies who are often more innovative. Fourth, Wouters suggested that taking these issues together provides an inspiring collective research agenda for the scientometrics community. Diana Hicks' suggestion of a manifesto or set of principles was followed up on the second day of the STI conference at the annual meeting of ENID (European Network of Indicators Designers). The ENID assembly, and Ton van Raan as president, offered to play a coordinating role in writing up the statement. Diana Hicks' draft will serve as a basis, and it will also be informed by opinions from the community, important stakeholders and intermediary organisations, as well as those affected by evaluations. The debate on standardization and use will be continued in upcoming science policy conferences, with a session confirmed for the AAAS (San Jos?, February) and expected sessions in the STI and ISSI conferences in 2015. (Thanks to Sabrina Petersohn for sharing her notes of the debate.) ________________________________ Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677, Registered in The Netherlands. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From riorma at GMAIL.COM Thu Sep 18 08:20:16 2014 From: riorma at GMAIL.COM (=?UTF-8?Q?Enrique_Ordu=C3=B1a?=) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:20:16 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: ?Dear Yves, and colleagues: Our apologies for the delayed response. Slow bibliometrics... A good slogan for a society and science of hurry. At a stroke you have smashed down our fashionable specialty trend in our field. We refer to the ALTMETRICS, a world where everyone every hour measure everything before you even find meaning to the meter and the resulting measures. But we live under the tyranny of the empire of the measure both on a social level (trending topics) and scientific level (h index). And we are afraid that this is unstoppable because we measure vanity and narcissus, inherent in scientific activity and human nature properties. Maybe it is time to organize a new Bonfire of the Vanities. Anyway science progresses only if experienced, and the world of metrics is no different. Oh, as a best example, YES THIS: Sigmund Freud H index: 245. BUT is this about who has the longest nose? ? Enrique Ordu?a-Malea & Emilio Delgado On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Yves Gingras wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > Hello > > Having worked with Bourdieu before is untimely death in 2002, I cannot let > pass this opportinity to suggest that it would be nice if in addition to > just looking at h-index for the fun of it (which by the way we do not need > to know that Bourdieu is among the very few great sociologists of the > second half of the 20th century) people read his book: *Science of > science and reflexivity* (Chicago press, 2004). He talks briefly about > scientometrics on p. 14, and putting more *reflexive *sociology into our *thinking > *before *counting *would be welcome... > > After ?slow science? why not a new motto for all of us: ?slow > bibliometrics: thinking before counting? > > > Best regards > > Yves Gingras > > > > Le 11/09/14 10:34, ? Isidro F. Aguillo ? a > ?crit : > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > Dear Stephen, > > Thanks for your comments. I understand the private nature of Google, but > Mendeley (owned by Elsevier) and other similar biblio/altmetric sources are > also commercial backed companies and they are offering good APIs for > in-depth, large data analysis. > > as a matter of curiosity I checked the largest h-index in Google Scholar > Citations and it looks to be: > > > Pierre Bourdieu > > Centre de Sociologie Europ?enne, Coll?ge de France > http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=d_lp40IAAAAJ&hl=en > > > > Citations 361973 > h-index 207 > > Any better candidates? > > > On 11/09/2014 16:13, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > > > > > > Isidro, > > Unfortunately Google is a cautious private enterprise company with > commercial interest and secrets. For example, it is very cautious when it > comes to copyright. I really hate it when I find a book chapter of > interest to me but cannot download it or copy/paste it. Moreover, with > Google Scholar citations it allows you to make the choice whether you want > yours public or private. That keeps the door open for Harzing?s > Publish-or-Perish program. Google does not want any law suits resulting > from making your private data public without your permission. > > > > Google allows you large enough samples for most purposes. For example, > when it comes to individuals, the main measure appears to be the h-index. > For analytical purposes, your h-index has to be above 50 to provide a > proper sample. Few people have h-indexes above 50, and I know of none with > an h-index above 1000. > > > > Google?s database is Google?s private property. It can do with it what it > wants. I imagine that?like Thomson Reuters?you could purchase a lot of > data from it. However, you may be some sort of Bolshevik, who wants the > right to expropriate it. As for the uselessness of Google Scholar, I will > quote your compatriots below: > > > > ?Now, when empirical studies ( > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > b) are the most used products by scientists (*http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711) > > > > *,? > > > > Why don?t you take up your case with them as well? > > Respectfully, > > Stephen J Bensman > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [ > mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On > Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:46 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing > the numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > > Are you talking about Google Scholar? > > The useless bibliographic tool that does not allow to extract large data > sets? > > The system that blocked the access to it to your whole organization if > you try to do it? > > Are suffering CAPTCHA? > > Is somebody able to talk with them and convince of changing their > approach to our community? > > On 10/09/2014 20:17, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > > > > Enrique and Emilio. > > I read your working paper with great interest as it deals with the same > topic on which we are doing research here at LSU. To tell you the honest > truth, I had trouble with its basic premise, i.e., that Google Scholar (GS) > has a given size. I do not think that it does, and, if it does, it is > meaningless. The real problem is what is the size of documentary set that > is relevant to the search query. > > > > The WWW and PageRank (the Google search engine) operate within what can be > called the power-law or Lotkaian domain. Informetric laws also operate > within this domain. On top of that, PageRank operates on what is called > the probability ranking principle, by which the probability of relevance > exponentially decreases as the number of inlinks decreases, i.e. below a > certain point you are dealing with gibberish manufactured by the search > engine itself. Therefore, there is a need for left truncation and > determination of what can be termed the x-min. Since we are dealing with > the Lotkaian domain, the x-min marks the point where the asymptote or > ?tail? on the x-axis for the items begins. > > > > We are dealing with Nobelists, and what we have found is that with > PageRank the set of relevant documents is conterminous with the > researcher?s h-index and the ?tail? of his GS citations distribution. In > other words?whether by serendipity or not?the h-index is an excellent > estimate of the x-min of a GS citations distribution. Below that is what > the Germans would call a ?Trummerzone? or rubbish zone largely manufactured > by the search engine itself. This conterminous-ness is a validation of > both the h-index and Google Scholar. The relevance of the set is also > proven by the fact that the extreme outliers on the right messing up the > tail are usually works on the topics for which the Nobelist won the prize. > Case closed. > > > > Every field has its statistical problem. With medical research it is > right truncation, for every patient has to die before the results are > really known. With the WWW and scientometric research, it is left > truncation. > > > > If you are interested in how I view how Google Scholar works, you can read > our working papers at the following URLs: > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3872 > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4904 > > > > I hope to post another working paper there next week that will really > clinch the point. But who knows? I may be wrong. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. > > LSU Libraries > > Lousiana State University > > Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > USA > > > > > > *From:* ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [ > mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On > Behalf Of *Enrique Ordu?a > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:15 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the > numbers > > > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > > > > > ? ? > > > Dear Colleagues, > > The purpose of this mail is to present our latest working paper, > deposited on July 24, 2014. > > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/about-size-of-google-scholar-playing.html > > > > ? ? > > > > > > > > > > We propose the inextricable task of knowing the size of this huge black > hole looks like Google Scholar (GS). Anyway, as the title of the document ( > > > > ? ? > > > About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers), we have begun to > make accounts and using 4 different empirical methods we estimate that the > number of unique documents (different versions of a document are excluded) > should not be less than 160 million (as of May 2014). > > > > > > > > > > Regardless of this particular outcome, which is itself significant > (especially when compared with other scientific databases, and that gives > us key clues about the amount of scientific knowledge that can be > searchable, found and accessed to on the web), even more exciting is the > methodological challenge of this assumption. It has not only forced us to > devise various techniques for measuring the size of this dark object that > GS is, but > > > > ? also ? > > > applying them we have shed light, again, on various inconsistencies, > uncertainties and limitations of the search interface tools used by Google. > In short, we have learned more about what Google Scholar does or does not, > and we want to share it with you all. > > > > > > > > > > This research comes at a good time. We are not only almost celebrating the > 10th anniversary of GS but also hearing some voices (from somewhere in > Europe?) finally relying on the use of Google Scholar for scientific > evaluation. > > > > > > > > > > Now, when empirical studies ( > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/p/bibliography.html) > demonstrate every day that Google Scholar and its derivatives > > > > > > > > > > a) measure with similar credit to traditional bibliometric indicators, > > > > > b) are the most used products by scientists ( > http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711), > > > > ? and? > > > > > > > > c) have unfortunately ended up with the competition (Microsoft Academic > Search is in an unexplained hibernation, > http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/empirical-evidences-microsoft-academic-search-dead.html) > > > > ? .? > > > > > > > > > > > seems that certain euphoria unleashed. We are pleased, better late than > never? > > > > > > > > > > However, without wanting to lower the aroused expectations, we emphasize > that the problems of Google Scholar for scientific evaluation are not > technical or methodological (coverage, reliability and validity of the > measures, records filtering performance?). Seminal limitations are those > related with: > > > > > > > > > > a) the ease with which GS indicators can be manipulated > > > > ? > > > ( > http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/google-scholar-wins-ravesbut-can-it-be.htmt), > > b) the transience of the results and measures (in many cases difficult to > replicate stably), > > c) the technological dependence on companies that develop tools that come > and go on the consumer product market ( > http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com.es/2014/04/la-new-new-horizontes.html-bibliometrics). > > > > > > > > > > Google Scholar enthusiasts are now welcome; meanwhile we will continue > vigorously in which we already proposed several years ago: to reveal with > ?data? > > > > ? - ? > > > and not mere opinions > > > > ? -? > > > , the bowels of Google Scholar, and to reveal at the same time their > strengths and weaknesses. So, like the old serials published, we can only > promise...TO BE CONTINUED? > > > > > > > > > > > ? Best,? > > > > > > > > > Enrique Ordu?a-Malea? > > > > > ? Polytechnic University of Valencia? > > > > > > > > > ? ?Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar > > > > > Universidad de Granada? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yves Gingras > > Professeur > D?partement d'histoire > Centre interuniversitaire de recherche > sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) > Chaire de recherche du Canada en histoire > et sociologie des sciences > Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) > UQAM > C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville > Montr?al, Qu?bec > Canada, H3C 3P8 > > Tel: (514)-987-3000-7053 > Fax: (514)-987-7726 > > http://www.chss.uqam.ca > http://www.cirst.uqam.ca > http://www.ost.uqam.ca > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Thu Sep 18 09:06:22 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:06:22 +0000 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=8BAbout_?= the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Enrique and Emilo, Thank you for the kind offer to look over our working paper when we have it posted on arXiv. We should have it posted by the week after next. I have finished the first draft and sent it out to my collaborators for comment. To whet your appetite, here is the title and abstract. ?POWER-LAW DISTRIBUTIONS, THE H-INDEX, AND GOOGLE SCHOLAR (GS) CITATIONS: A TEST OF THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH ECONOMICS NOBELISTS Abstract This paper comprises an analysis of whether Google Scholar (GS) can construct documentary sets relevant for the evaluation of the works of researchers. The researchers analyzed were two samples of Nobelists in economics: an original sample of five laureates downloaded in September, 2011; and a validating sample of laureates downloaded in October, 2013. Two methods were utilized to conduct this analysis. The first is distributional. Here it is shown that the distributions of the laureates? works by total GS citations belong within the Lotkaian or power-law domain, whose major characteristic is asymptote or ?tail? to the right. It also proves that this asymptote is conterminous with the laureates? h-indexes, which demarcate their core ?uvre. This overlap is proof of both the ability of GS to form relevant documentary sets and the validity of the h-index. The second method is semantic. This method shows that the extreme outliers at the right tip of the tail?a signature feature of the economists? distributions?are not random events but related by subject to contributions to the discipline for which the laureates were awarded this prize. Another interesting finding is the important role played by working papers in the dissemination of new economic knowledge.? Since I am vetting these ideas, I decided to cc the entire list. I hope that you not mind. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: riorma at gmail.com [mailto:riorma at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 1:20 AM To: Stephen J Bensman Cc: Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Dear Stephen, Thanks again for your email. Of course we will be pleased to have a look at your preprint once you finish it. As regards your research focus, I understand what you mean. The topology of the net is meaninful itself, and sometimes the estructure becomes the information. The Eigenvector of each node can give us information about the most relevant pieces for an especific query. And net metrics are relevant here. But this is just one way to look at Google Scholar (clearly of much interest). We just wanted to know a) the total number of nodes (considering node each bibliographical record), because this influence the documents available to conform the set of documents that fits a query, and b) If Google Scholar let us knowing this size. Of course, the growth of total size is not going to affect neither the topology (at least at short term) nor the influence of particular nodes. Our focus were not in the connections of nodes (citations, mentions, links..) but on the proportion of current academic literature covered. Of course this is a first step, and we want to know more things now. And do not worry...we usually go out on a limb too... Enrique & Emilio On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Stephen J Bensman > wrote: Enrique and Emilio, Thank you for the thoughtful e-mail. I have downloaded the Khabsa and Giles article and will look at your presentation (I hope there is an English version). I am in the final stages of finishing what I think may be a major article and will incorporate your suggestions as much as possible. I will be posting this article or working paper on arXiv soon and would like you to look it over before submission to a major journal. We are at the cutting edge, where vested interests are threatened and disagreements deep, and it is necessary to see the objections and know how to counter them. I do not think that it is the physical size of the GS universe that is important but its structure. PageRank is nothing but a further development of Garfield?s theory of citation indexing and what is important and fascinating here is that relevant sets are semantically defined not by words but by linkages. This leads to something of a tautology in reasoning, because what emerges as relevant from linkages has to be defined again in words to be communicated. Moreover, WWW structure is in the power-law or Lotkaian domain, and therefore linkages to sites are highly skewed with few sites having most linkages. This results in two things: 1) the so-called ?diameter? of the universe is very small in that it takes very few jumps to cross it; and 2) your probability of landing on an important, relevant site are much higher than landing on an unimportant, irrelevant one. Size can increase exponentially with little effect on this. This comprises the telemetry of PageRank, guiding it to its targets. What works against this telemetry is the chaos governing the WWW due to its lack of authority structure. Therefore, you need what you seem to be calling an ?API? to edit and control your data, the best of which now is Harzing?s. I am an enhance cataloger certified by the Library of Congress, and our biggest concern is authority structure, so I know its importance. Boy!? I have really gone out on a limb here, and somebody may saw it off. Respectfully, Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Enrique Ordu?a Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 7:08 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] ?About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear Stephen, Thank you very much again for your interesting email, it helps us to debate and discuss in a very concentrated form. As regards Barabasi and Albert studies (and Broder, Baeza-Yates and many other colleagues), we have certainly learned a lot from them. However, I think they are located in another analysis context, as they are intended to measure the network, and we just the database (which obviously harvest the net, but filtering contents). Therefore, our aim was to count the number of bibliographic records that Google Scholar. That is, Google Scholar is an academic search engine, but also a bibliographical database. And that amount (and its evolution) gives us much information. In addition, a record in Google Scholar database does not always correspond to an online digital object (a node the academic network), since many records are mere citations that do not lead to any website. In any case, unless this point, which is determined by simply have different research interests, I think we agree in fact about what is a defined or undefined universe of information. Let us recommend you the following presentation: http://es.slideshare.net/torressalinas/the-google-scholar-family-is-it-an-alternative-for-the-evaluation-of-science In addition, Google Scholar is able to measure not only scientific impact, but the professional and social impact of people, something that neither WoS nor Scopus do, and that certainly explains the high values in the performance of economists and other researchers in social sciences and humanities. We therefore believe that it is interesting to know the size of Google Scholar, also measured in this way. And it seems we are not the only ones to be concerned about this. We recommend the following work performed by Khabsa & Giles (2014), which certainly enlightened us on our way. Khabsa & Giles (2014). ?The number of scholarly documents on the public web. Plos One, 9(5): e93949.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093949 As regards Google Scholar?s opacity, while we agree that it is a company and Google can do whatever they want with their products, we should remind that the bibliographic records that Google Scholar catalogs and provides access to are harvested in most from public entities (such as institutional repositories from public universities). A little consideration with those institutions that nurture for free its database would be appreciated, ?for example an API to be used for academic purposes. But this is a personal appreciation. And of course we can learn a lot from each other. We will be happy to read your work and communicate you our ideas and suggestions and / or vice versa. We are in contact. Kind regards, Enrique Ordu?a-Malea & Emilio Delgado L?pez-C?zar -- [http://www.institutoidf.com/images/idf_upv_firma] [http://ec3.ugr.es/iconos/ec3-trans.png] Enrique Ordu?a-Malea Personal de investigaci?n. Grupo de Investigaci?n EC3. Instituto de Dise?o y Fabricaci?n (IDF). Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV). Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia. Edificio 1H. Tfo. 96 3879480 (Ext. 79480) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Sun Sep 21 10:11:13 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:11:13 -0400 Subject: Fwd: Estimating institutional total annual institutional article output vs estimating percentage deposit Message-ID: [Bibliometric questions of possible interest to SIGMET list, forwarded from GOAL] Using total institutional Web-of-Science-indexed article output as the baseline with which to compare instutional deposit percentages yields an underestimate (as we always state with our findings) *of total institutional article output*, of course, by definition. But it is not at all clear that there is any reason to assume that that this is an underestimate of the *deposit percentage*. (Why would authors be more compliant with a deposit mandate with non-WoS journal articles than with WoS journal articles?) As I have already replied to Jean-Claude, if someone believes that the deposit percentage would be systematically different for non-WoS articles, there are ways to test this. An obvious way is to specifically test SCOPUS *non-WoS-indexed* articles, to see whether their deposit percentage turns out to be any different. Other indices can be used too, to test non-ISI-articles, including non-English-language indices. But I do think that there is some conflation of total output with deposit percentage here. For any institutional repository, we know the total deposits, we just don't know what percentage of total institutional output they reflect. Now Li?ge has a second way to estimate this (*if they can be confident that Li?ge authors have indeed at least been compliant in depositing the bibliographic metadata for all their articles, as mandated*). And the fact that the Li?ge repository (ORBi) has been designated as the sole means of submitting publications for institutional performance review makes it very likely that Li?ge authors have been faithfully depositing all their metadata there. This does give Li?ge a way to improve its estimate of the percentage deposit of full texts. But this method (as I'm sure Bernard & Paul will agree) is a bit of a bootstrap, as it is based on the assumption (not the evidence) *that all authors are faithfully depositing the metadata for all their articles.* The WoS estimate makes no such assumption. It gets the metadata from a reliable source elsewhere. (But the comparison is certainly worth making.) Other institutions, however, whose mandates do not yet include Li?ge's all-important performance-review condition, will not be able to use this second method to estimate the effectiveness of their deposit mandates. Indeed, one of the rationales for adopting an institutional deposit mandate is that *institutions currently have no way of knowing their total research output* -- hence they can only find out by consulting external databases such as WoS or SCOPUS! One last point. It is certain that WoS underestimates total non-English-language article output and hence it is conceivable that authors at a non-English-language institution could have a higher deposit rate for their non-English-language articles than their English ones. Whether the WoS baseline thus generates a biassed underestimate of overall percentage deposit at non-English-language institutions can be tested against a relevant non-English-language bibliographic index. However, this definitely does not support Jean-Claude's parallel conjecture that the WoS baseline might produce a biassed estimate of the deposit percentage of SSH (Social Sciences and Humanities) *journal articles*. It is logically possible that SSH authors are selectively non-compliant with deposit mandates for their journal articles -- but that, of course, could already be tested with the WoS baseline data... *Stevan Harnad* On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Richard Poynder wrote in GOAL: > As a layperson I would certainly be interested to know what margin of > error levels we can assume the ?Web of Science and/or in Scopus? approach > has. I am conscious, for instance, that some of the reports by UK > universities into RCUK compliance mention using Web of Science, but they > all appear keen to stress that they have serious concerns about data > accuracy. > > > > A list of RCUK compliance reports, by the way, can be found here: > http://goo.gl/Yi3twT > > > > There is also a very informative blog post on the topic of monitoring open > access mandates/policies by Cameron Neylon here: http://goo.gl/Y02S87 > > > > Richard Poynder > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Jean-Claude Gu?don > *Sent:* 20 September 2014 23:27 > *To:* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) > *Subject:* [GOAL] Re: Fwd: The Open Access Interviews: Paul Royster > > > > Extremely good answer, Bernard! > > It is also very good to clarify the fact that the 90% figure is calculated > against the baseline of a combined WoS_Scopus search. However, and this was > part of my difficulties with Stevan's argument, I suspect that in SSH, in a > French-speaking university, many publish in French-language journals that > do not appear in either list. This means that, for Li?ge, the baseline > works from one year to the next, but if you want to compare Li?ge's mandate > and its effectiveness (which, once again, I agree, is - from common sense - > the best) with another kind of mandate in an English-speaking university, > the baselines will not be comparable. > > If, furthermore, you imagine two universities that not only differ > linguistically, but also differ in the relative weight of disciplines in > research output - say one heavily slanted STM and the other heavily slanted > SSH, this too will affect the baseline simply by virtue of the fact that > SSH publications are not as well covered by WoS and Scopus as are STM > publications. > > In conclusion, the baseline is OK for comparisons of a mandate's > effectiveness longitudinally, of for comparison purposes of two successive, > but different, mandates, assuming the institution remains pretty much the > same over time in terms of mix of research emphases; it is far more > questionable across institutions, especially when different languages are > involved (but not only). > > Incidentally, what proportion of papers deposited in ORBI do not appear in > either WoS or Scopus? That too would be interesting to know as it might > help Stevan refine his baseline and thus make it more convincing. > > Finally, given that all universities require, an annual assessment of > performance, including a bibliography of publications in the completed > year, would it be difficult to compare the repository's holding against the > publications of the researchers as declared by them? Knowing researchers, > every last little scrap of paper will be minutely listed in the yearly > assessment forms... [image: :-)] > > -- > > > > Jean-Claude Gu?don > > Professeur titulaire > > Litt?rature compar?e > > Universit? de Montr?al > > Le samedi 20 septembre 2014 ? 19:10 +0200, Bernard Rentier - IMAP a ?crit : > > Dear Richard, > > > > Here are the answers: > > > > 1. ORBi, the Li?ge University Repository, will soon (I believe) reach 90% > compliance. It is our target for 2014 and I hope we make it. > > This figure comes from the calculation of the percentage of ULg papers > that can be found in Web of Science and/or in Scopus that are deposited in > ORBi as well (see method in http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340294/) > > It concerns one year at a time and it is not cumulative. Last May, the > compliance level for the publications of 2013 was already 73% and our > figure for 2012 is in the 80% range. > > > > 2. Only a small proportion of ULg papers are in CC-BY. > > This is simply because, in order to publish in the journal of their choice > (I haven?t tried to do anything against that!), our authors, in the great > centuries-old tradition, give away their rights to the publisher. We have > no control on that. > > Later on, there is no way for them to CC-BY the same text (in fact, we are > preparing ORBi 2.0, that will offer a CC-BY choice). > > For now, we are aiming at free access and we are not yet fighting hard for > re-use rights. We shall move progressively in this direction of course, > while the publishing mores evolve? > > In other words, I agree that we have free access, not a full fledge open > access yet. It is not a failure, it is our objective to gain confidence > first. > > Unfortunately, even if we have established in-house rules for evaluation, > external evaluations are still based on traditional indicators such as the > highly and rightfully criticized but widely used Impact Factor and the > like. In these conditions, today we cannot sacrifice our researchers ? > singularly the young ones ? in the overall competition for jobs and funds, > on the altar of ? pure ? Open Access. > > > > Best wishes > > > > Bernard Rentier > > Rector, University of Li?ge, Belgium > > > > > > > > > > Le 19 sept. 2014 ? 21:52, Richard Poynder a > ?crit : > > > > Dear Bernard, > > > > I have two questions if I may: > > > > 1. You say that Li?ge is getting close to 90% compliance. Can you > explain how you know that, and how you calculate compliance levels? I ask > this because the consistent theme coming through from UK universities with > regard to compliance to the RCUK OA mandate is that they simply do not know > how many research outputs their faculty produce each year. If that is > right, what systems does Li?ge have in place to enable it to produce a > comprehensive list of research outputs that UK universities apparently do > not have? > > > > 2. Does Li?ge track the licences attached to the deposits in its > repository? If so, can you provide some stats, especially the number of > items that are available CC-BY (which we are now told is required before a > deposit can be characterised as being open access? > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Richard Poynder > > > > > > *From:* goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org > ] *On Behalf Of *brentier at ulg.ac.be > *Sent:* 19 September 2014 18:46 > *To:* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) > *Subject:* [GOAL] Re: Fwd: The Open Access Interviews: Paul Royster > > > > "*Li?ge does not mandate anything, so far as I know; it only looks into > the local repository (Orbi) to see what is in it, and it does so to assess > performance or respond to requests for promotions or grant submissions.*" > (JC. Gu?don) > > > > Oh no, Jean-Claude, Li?ge mandates everything. > > It is a real mandate and it took me a while to get almost every ULg > researcher to realise that it is to his/her benefit. > > Linking the deposits to personal in-house assessment was the trick to get > the mandate enforced in the first place. As well as a few positive > incentives and a lot of time consuming persuasion (but it was well worth > it). > > Last Wednesday, the Li?ge University Board has put an ultimate touch of > wisdom on its mandate by adding "*immediately upon acceptance, even in > restricted access*" in the official procedure. Actually, a nice but to > some extent useless addition because, with time (the mandate was imposed in > 2007), ULg authors have become so convinced of the increase in readership > and citations that two thirds of them make their deposits between the date > of acceptance and the date of publication. > > All this explains why we are getting close to 90% compliance, an > outstanding result, I believe. > > > > > > > Le 18 sept. 2014 ? 23:40, Jean-Claude Gu?don < > jean.claude.guedon at umontreal.ca> a ?crit : > > A reasonably quick response as I do not want to go into discursive tsunami > mode... > > 1. Stevan admits that his evaluation of compliance is an approximation, > easy to get, but not easy to correct. This approximation varies greatly > from one institution to another, one circumstance to another. For example, > he admits that language plays a role; he should further admit that the > greater or smaller proportion of SSH researchers in the research > communities of various institutions will also play a role. in short, > comparing two institutions by simply using WoS approximations appears rash > and unacceptable to me, rather than simply quick and dirty (which I would > accept as a first approximation). > > The impact factor folly was mentioned because, by basing his approximation > on the WoS, Stevan reinforces the centrality of a partial and questionable > tool that is, at best, a research tool, not a management tool, and which > stands behind all the research assessment procedures presently used in > universities, laboratories, etc. > > 2. Stevan and I have long differed about OA's central target. He limits > himself to journal articles, as a first step; I do not. I do not because, > in the humanities and social sciences, limiting oneself to journal articles > would be limiting oneself to the less essential part of the archive we work > with, unlike natural scientists. > > Imagine a universe where a research metric would have been initially > designed around SSH disciplines and then extended as is to STM. In such a > parallel universe, books would be the currency of choice, and articles > would look like secondary, minor, productions, best left for later > assessments. Then, one prominent OA advocate named Stenan Harvard might > argue that the only way to proceed forward is to focus only on books, that > this is OA's sole objective, and that articles and the rest will be treated > later... Imagine the reaction of science researchers... > > 3. Li?ge does not mandate anything, so far as I know; it only looks into > the local repository (Orbi) to see what is in it, and it does so to assess > performance or respond to requests for promotions or grant submissions. If > books and book chapters are more difficult to treat than articles, then > place them in a dark archive with a button. This was the clever solution > invented by Stevan and I agree with it. > > 4. To obtain mandates, you need either faculty to vote a mandate on itself > (but few universities have done so), or you need administrators to impose a > mandate, but that is often viewed negatively by many of our colleagues. > Meanwhile, they are strongly incited to publish in "prestigious journals" > where prestige is "measured" by impact factors. From an average > researcher's perspective, one article in Nature, fully locked behind > pay-walls, is what is really valuable. Adding open access may be the cherry > on the sundae, but it is not the sundae. The result? OA, as of now, is not > perceived to be directly significant for successfully managing a career. > > On the other hand, the OA citation advantage has been fully recognized and > accepted by publishers. That is in part why they are finally embracing OA: > with high processing charges and the increased citation potential of OA, > they can increase revenues even more and satisfy their stakeholders. This > is especially true if funders, universities, libraries, etc., are willing > to pay for the APC's. This is the trap the UK fell into. > > 5. SSH authors are less interested in depositing articles than STM > researchers because, for SSH researchers, articles have far less importance > than books (see above), and, arguably, book chapters. > > 6. I am not citing rationales for the status quo, and Stevan knows this > well. This must be the first time that I have ever been associated with the > status quo... Could it be that criticizing Stevan on one point could be > seen by him as fighting for the status? But that would be true only if > Stevan were right beyond the slightest doubt. Hmmmmmmmmmm! > > I personally think he is right on some points and not so right on others. > > Also, I am simply trying to think about reasons why OA has been so hard to > achieve so far, and, in doing so, I have come to two conclusions: too > narrow an objective and too rigid an approach can both be > counter-productive. > > This said, trying to have a method to compare deposit rates in various > institutional and mandate circumstances would be very useful. I support > Stevan's general objective in this regard; I simply object to the validity > of the method he suggests. Alas, I have little to suggest beyond my > critique. > > I also suggest that a better understanding of the sociology of research > (not the sociology of knowledge) is crucial to move forward. > > Finally, I expect that if I saw Stevan self-archive his abundant > scientific production, I would be awed by the lightning speed of his > keystrokes. But are they everybody's keystrokes? > > Jean-Claude Gu?don > > > -- > > > > Jean-Claude Gu?don > > Professeur titulaire > > Litt?rature compar?e > > Universit? de Montr?al > > Le jeudi 18 septembre 2014 ? 12:28 -0400, Stevan Harnad a ?crit : > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Claude Gu?don < > jean.claude.guedon at umontreal.ca> wrote: > > Most interesting dialogue. > > I will focus on two points: > > 1. *Using the Web of Science collection as a reference*: this generates > all kinds of problems, particularly for disciplines that are not dominated > and skewed by the impact factor folly. This is true, for example, of most > of the social sciences and the humanities, especially when these > publications are not in English. > > > > The purpose of using WoS (or SCOPUS, or any other standardized index) as a > * baseline* for assessing OA repository success is to be able to estimate > (and compare) *what percentage of an institution's total annual refereed > journal article output has been self-archived. * > > > > Raw total or annual deposit counts tell us neither (1) whether the > deposits are refereed journal articles nor (2) when the articles were > published, nor (most important of all) (3) what proportion of total annual > refereed journal article output is deposited. > > > > Institutions do not know even know their total annual refereed journal > article output. (One of the (many) reasons for mandating self-archiving is > in order to get that information.) > > > > The WoS (or SCOPUS, or other) standardized database provides the > denominator against which the deposits of those articles provide the > numerator. > > > > Once that ratio is known (for WoS articles, for example), it provides an > estimate of the proportion of total institutional article output > deposited. > > > > Anyone can then "correct" the ratio for their institution and discipline, > if they wish, by simply taking a (large enough) sample of total > institutional journal article output for a recent year and seeing what > percentage of it is in WoS! (This would obviously have to be done > discipline by discipline; and indeed the institutional totals should also > be broken down and analyzed by discipline.) > > > > So if D/W, the WoS-deposit/total-WoS ratio = R, and w/s, the > WoS-indexed-portion/total-output-sample = c, then c can be used to upgrade > W to the estimate of total institutional article output, and the WoS > deposit ratio R can be compared to the deposit ratio for the non-WoS sample > (*which must not, of course, be derived from the repository, but some > other way!*) to get a non-WoS ratio of Rc. > > > > My own prediction is that R and Rc will be quite similar, but if not, c > can also be used to correct R to better reflect both WoS and non-WoS output > and their relative sizes. > > > > But R is still by far the easiest and fastest way to get an estimate of > institutional deposit percentages. > > > > (As far as I can see, none of this has much to do with impact factor > folly. For non-English-language institutions, however, the non-WoS > correction may be more substantial.) > > > > Stevan has also and long argued about limiting oneself to journal > articles. I have my own difficulties with this limitation because book > chapters and monographs are so important in the disciplines that I tend to > work in. Also, I regularly write in French as well as English, while > reading articles in a variety of languages. Most of the articles that are > not in English are not in the Web of Science. A better way to proceed would > be to check if the journals not in the WoS, and corresponding to deposited > articles, are peer-reviewed. The same could be done with book chapters. > Incidentally, if I limited myself to WoS publications for annual > performance review, I would look rather bad. I suspect I am not the only > one in such a situation, while leading a fairly honourable career in > academe. > > > > Authors are welcome to deposit as much as they like: articles, chapters, > books, data, software. > > > > But OA's primary target (and also its primary obstacle) is journal > articles. Ditto for OA mandates. > > > > All disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, in all > languages, write journal articles. This discussion is about the means of > measuring the success of an OA self-archiving mandate. It applies to all > journal articles (and refereed conference articles) in all disciplines. > > > > There are problems with mandating book deposit, or even book chapter > deposit, so that is being left for later. > > > > Nothing is being said about performance review except that the way to > submit journal articles should be stipulated to be repository deposit. > > > > 2. *The issue of rules and regulations.* It is absolutely true that a > procedure such as the one adopted at the Universit? de Li?ge and which > Stevan aptly summarizes as (with a couple of minor modifications): "*henceforth > the way to submit refereedjournal article publications for annual > performance review is to deposit them in the [appropriate] IR "*. > > > > Li?ge does not mandate the deposit of books. > > > > However, obtaining this change of behaviour from an administration is no > small task. At the local, institutional, level, it corresponds to a > politically charged effort that requires having a number of committed OA > advocates working hard to push the idea. Stevan should know this from his > own experience in Montreal; he should also know that, presently, the Open > Access issue is not on the radar of most researchers. In scientific > disciplines, they tend to be mesmerized by impact factors without making > the link between this obsession and the OA advantage, partly because enough > controversies have surrounded this issue to maintain a general feeling of > uncertainty and doubt. In the social sciences and humanities where the > citation rates are far less "meaningful" - I put quotation marks here to > underscore the uncertainty surrounding the meaning of citation numbers: > visibility, prestige, quality? - the benefits of self-archiving one's > articles in open access are less obvious to researchers, especially if they > do not adopt a global perspective on the importance of the "grand > conversation" needed to produce knowledge in an optimal manner, but rather > intend to manage and protect their career. > > > > I am not sure what is the point of the above observations. I agree it has > been difficult to get authors to deposit. That's why the OA movement has > turned to mandates, and now to ways of optimizing mandates so as to > facilitate and maximize success (i.e. deposit rates). And here we are just > talking about how to measure and compare those deposit rates between > institutions, and between mandates. > > > > Nothing about impact factors, performance evaluation criteria, metrics, > discipline criteria or language differences. Just ways to induce journal > article authors to deposit them in their institutional repositories. > > > > Saying all this is not saying that we should not remain committed to OA, > far from it; is is simply saying that the chances of success in reaching OA > will not be significantly improved by simply referring to "huge" benefits > at the cost of only a few extra keystrokes. This is rhetoric. The last time > I deposited an article of mine, given the procedure used in the depository > I was using, it took me close to half an hour to enter all the details > required by that depository - a depository organized by librarians, mainly > for information science specialists. All these details were legitimate and > potentially useful. However, while I was absolutely sure I was doing the > right thing, I could well understand why a colleague less sanguine about OA > than I am might push this task to the back burner. In fact, I did so myself > for several months. Shame on me, probably, but this is the reality of the > quotidian. > > > > I invite Jean-Claude to time me depositing an article in my institutional > repository (and I am not a fast typist)! It takes about two minutes. > > > > In conclusion, i suspect that if Stevan focuses on such a narrowly-defined > target - journal articles in the STM disciplines - this is because he > gambles on the fact that making these disciplines fully OA would force the > other disciplines in the humanities and social sciences to follow suit > sooner or later. Perhaps, it is so, but perhaps it is not. Meanwhile, > arguing in this fashion tends to alienate practitioners of the humanities > and the social sciences, so that the alleged advantages of narrowly > focusing on a well-defined target are perhaps more than negatively > compensated by the neglect of SSH disciplines. yet, the latter constitute > about half, if not more, of the researchers in the world. > > > > The target is journal articles in all disciplines. Not clear why SSH > journal article authors would be any more or less compliant with > self-archiving mandates than any other discipline. It has nothing to do > with books, yet. > > > > Yes, once journal articles are being self-archived universally, many other > things will follow. > > > > I suggest that it may be more constructive to practice deposit keystrokes > to provide OA than to cite a-priori rationales for the status quo, > Jean-Claude. I bet you'll be up to speed after depositing just a few > articles! > > > > Stevan Harnad > > Le mercredi 17 septembre 2014 ? 07:07 -0400, Stevan Harnad a ?crit : > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > *From: *Stevan Harnad > > *Subject: *Re: The Open Access Interviews: Paul Royster > *Date: *September 16, 2014 at 5:28:48 PM GMT-4 > > *To: *JISC-REPOSITORIES at JISCMAIL.AC.UK > > > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Paul Royster wrote: > > > At the risk of stirring up more sediment and further muddying the waters > of scholarly communications, > but in response to direct questions posed in this venue earlier this > month, I shall venture the following ? > > Answers for Dr. Harnad > > (1) What percentage of Nebraska-Lincoln output of peer-revewed journal > articles (only) per year is > deposited in the N-L Repository? About 3 months ago I furnished your > graduate student (at least he > said he was your student) with 5 years of deposit data so he could compare > it to Web of Science > publication dates and arrive at some data-based figure for this. I > cautioned him that I felt Web of > Science to be a narrow and commercially skewed comparison sample, but I > sent the data anyway. > So I expect you will have an answer to this query before I do. If the news > is good, I hope you will > share it with this list; if not, then let your conscience be your guide. > As for benchmarking, I don?t believe > it is a competition, and every step in the direction of free scholarship > is a positive one. I hope when > they hand out the medals we at least get a ribbon for participation. > > > > Thanks for reminding me! It was my post-doc, Yassine Gargouri, and I just > called him to ask about > the UNL results. He said he has the UNL data and will have the results of > the analysis in 2-3 weeks! > > > So the jury is still out. But many thanks for sending the data. Apparently > Sue was not aware that UNL > had provided those data (and I too had forgotten!). > > > (2) Why doesn?t N-L adopt a self-archiving mandate? > I do not even attempt to explain the conduct of the black box that is my > university?s administration; > so in short, I cannot say why or why not. I can only say why I have not > campaigned for adoption of > such a mandate. My reasons have been purely personal and idiosyncratic, > and I do not hold them > up as a model for anyone else or as representing the thinking or attitude > of this university. Bluntly, > I have not sought to create a mandate because I feel there are enough > regulations and requirements > in effect here already. Instituting more rules brings further problems of > enforcement or compliance, > and it creates new categories of deviance. There are already too many > rules: we have to park in > designated areas; we have to drink Pepsi rather than Coke products; we > have to wear red on game > days; we can?t enter the building through the freight dock; etc. etc. etc. > I simply do not believe in > creating more rules and requirements, even if they are for our own good. > The Faculty Senate > voted to ?endorse and recommend? our repository; I have not desired more > than that. But I am > concerned mainly with 1600 faculty on two campuses in one medium-sized > university town?not > with a universal solution to the worldwide scholarly communications > crisis. I see discussions lately > about ?putting teeth? into mandated deposit rules, and I wonder?who is > intended to be bitten? > Apparently, the already-beleaguered faculty. > > > > I agree that we are over-regulated! But I think that doing a few extra > keystrokes when a refereed > final draft is accepted for publication is really very little, and the > potential benefits are huge. Also, > there is some evidence as to how authors comply with a self-archiving > mandate ? if it?s the right > self-archiving mandate, i.e., If the mandate simply indicates that* henceforth > the way to submit refereed* > *journal article publications for annual performance review is to deposit > them in UNL?s IR* (rather than > however they are being submitted currently) then UNL faculty will comply > as naturally as they did > when it was mandaed that submissions should be online rather than in hard > copy. It?s just a technological upgrade. > > > > (3) Why do you lump together author-pays with author-self-archives? > I was not aware that I did this, so perhaps you are responding to Sue?s > catalog of various proposed > solutions??author-pays OA, mandated self-archiving of manuscripts, CHORUS, > SHARE, and others??as > all being ?ineffectual or unsustainable initiatives to varying degrees.? I > feel we are strong believers and > even advocates for author self-archiving (so-called), and disdainful > non-advocates for author-pays models. > But I think we have become aware of the divergence of interests between > the global theoretics of the > open access ?movements? on the one hand and the ?boots-on-the-ground? > practicalities of managing > a local repository, even one with global reach, on the other. Crusades for > and controversies about > ?open access? have come to seem far removed from what we actually do, and > now seem more of a > distraction than a help or guide. > > > > I can understand that, from the library?s perspective: The library can?t > mandate self-archiving, can?t fund > author-pays, and can?t do anything about authors? rights. But maybe, if > you look at the evidence that > mandates work, and become convinced, then the library could encourage the > administration? And > of course if self-archiving is mandated at UNL, then the library can help > with mediated self-archiving, > at least initially, as I pointed out to Sue (though it?s hardly necessary, > for a few keystrokes ? certainly > a much smaller task than UNL?s current mediated deposit: tracking down the > PDF. checking the rights. etc.). > > > We have been (and continue to be) constant supporters of ?green? open > access; and we have appreciated > Dr. Harnad?s reliably indefatigable defenses of that cause against > innumerable critics, nay-sayers, and > ?holier-than-thou? evangelists of competing approaches. I sympathize with > his weariness, I applaud his tirelessness, > and I do not wish to tax his patience further. I hope no part of this > response will be interpreted as attempting > to dispute, contradict, or diminish any of his points. I regret if these > answers are unsatisfactory or incomplete, > but that is all I can manage at this time. > > > > Much appreciated, Paul! > > > Hope to have the UNL data for you soon, with a comparison with other IRs, > mandated and unmandated. > > > Best wishes, > > > Stevan > > > > Paul Royster > Coordinator of Scholarly Communications > University of Nebraska?Lincoln > proyster at unl.edu > http://digitalcommons.unl.edu > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GOAL mailing list > > GOAL at eprints.org > > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL at eprints.org > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GOAL mailing list > > GOAL at eprints.org > > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL at eprints.org > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL at eprints.org > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GOAL mailing list > > GOAL at eprints.org > > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL at eprints.org > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 925 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From katy at INDIANA.EDU Mon Sep 22 16:02:42 2014 From: katy at INDIANA.EDU (Katy Borner) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:02:42 -0400 Subject: Call for Papers on =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CSocial_Media_Metrics_in_Scholarly_Communication=3A_?= =?UTF-8?Q?exploring_tweets=2C_blogs=2C_likes_and_other_altmetrics=E2=80?= =?UTF-8?Q?=9D?= In-Reply-To: <1939142645.733021411383703664.JavaMail.wladmin@c685pghs1as.int.thomsonreuters.com> Message-ID: On 9/22/2014 7:01 AM, dirk.lewandowski at haw-hamburg.de wrote: > 22-Sep-2014 > > Dear Prof. Katy Borner: > > Call for Papers on ?Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics? > > This special issue, to be published in 2015, is guest edited by Dr. Stefanie Haustein and Dr. Vincent Larivi?re, University of Montreal, and Dr. Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Indiana University Bloomington. > > What is the focus of this special issue? > Social media metrics?commonly coined as ?altmetrics??have been heralded as great democratizers of science, providing broader and timelier indicators of impact than citations. These metrics come from a range of sources, including Twitter, blogs, social reference managers, post-publication peer review, and other social media platforms. Social media metrics have begun to be used as indicators of scientific impact, yet the theoretical foundation, empirical validity, and extent of use of platforms underlying these metrics lack thorough treatment in the literature. > > For this special issue, we invite research papers focusing on social media in scholarly communication, which assess opportunities made available by and challenges of the use of various metrics from quantitative, qualitative, and theoretical points of view. Potential topics include but are not limited to: > > ? Novel methods of analyzing social media in scholarly communication; > ? Evaluation of various new sources of metrics (e.g., tweets, social bookmarking and readership counts, post publication peer review rankings, blog posts, mass media coverage, views and downloads of presentations, datasets, code); > ? Meaning of and differentiation between various social media metrics; > ? Challenging or validating the concept of alternative metrics; > ? Theoretical and qualitative approaches to classifying and defining social media metrics; > ? Best practices and limitations in data collection and cleaning; > ? Data accuracy and reproducibility; > ? User behavior; > ? Gaming or abuse of social media metrics; > ? Social media metrics in research evaluation and researchers? careers; > ? Ethics of social media metrics; > ? Altmetrics as tools for libraries and publishers; and > ? Social network analyses and visualizations of social media environments. > > Submissions > Papers should focus on social-media based tools and metrics in the context of scholarly communication. All methodological approaches are welcome. Case studies and proof-of-concept studies should present new and unique findings and highlight future research possibilities and developments. Opinion pieces and review articles will not be considered for the special issue. > > Papers should be 4,000 to 9,000 words in length (including references) and in accordance with the journal?s author guidelines (http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=ajim). > > For all additional information prior to submission, please contact Stefanie Haustein (stefanie.haustein at umontreal.ca), Vincent Larivi?re (vincent.lariviere at umontreal.ca), or Cassidy R. Sugimoto (sugimoto at indiana.edu). > > Please submit to Aslib Journal of Information Management using ScholarOne Manuscripts (http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ajoim), our online submission and peer review system. > > Sincerely, > Prof. Dirk Lewandowski > Aslib Journal of Information Management Editorial Office > dirk.lewandowski at haw-hamburg.de -- Katy Borner Victor H. Yngve Professor of Information Science Director, CI for Network Science Center, http://cns.iu.edu Curator, Mapping Science exhibit, http://scimaps.org ILS, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Wells Library 021, 1320 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA Phone: (812) 855-3256 Fax: -6166 From anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM Tue Sep 23 02:47:41 2014 From: anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM (anup kumar das) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:17:41 +0530 Subject: Interesting Current Science opinion paper on "Predatory Journals" Message-ID: *Predatory Journals and Indian Ichthyology* by R. Raghavan, N. Dahanukar, J.D.M. Knight, A. Bijukumar, U. Katwate, K. Krishnakumar, A. Ali and S. Philip *Current Science, 2014, 107(5), 740-742.* Although the 21st century began with a hope that information and communication technology will act as a boon for reinventing taxonomy, the advent and rise of electronic publications, especially predatory open-access journals, has resulted in an additional challenge (the others being gap, impediment and urgency) for taxonomy in the century of extinctions. Predatory publishing has damaged the very foundations of scholarly and academic publishing, and has led to unethical behaviour from scientists and researchers. The ?journal publishing industry? in India is a classical example of ?predatory publishing?, supported by researchers who are in a race to publish. The urge to publish ?quick and easy? can be attributed to two manifestations, i.e.?impactitis? and ?mihi itch?. While impactitis can be associated with the urge for greater impact factor (IF) and scientific merit, mihi itch (loosely) explains the behaviour of researchers, especially biologists publishing in predatory journals yearning to see their name/s associated with a new ?species name?. Most predatory journals do not have an IF, and authors publishing in such journals are only seeking an ?impact? (read without factor), and popularity by seeing their names appear in print media. This practice has most often led to the publication of substandard papers in many fields, including ichthyology. Download Full-text Article: http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/107/05/0740.pdf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.scharnhorst at DANS.KNAW.NL Tue Sep 23 05:21:09 2014 From: andrea.scharnhorst at DANS.KNAW.NL (Andrea Scharnhorst) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:21:09 +0200 Subject: paper you might find interesting Message-ID: arXiv:1409.6099 [pdf, ps, other] Identification of Influential Scientists vs. Mass Producers by the Perfectionism Index Antonis Sidiropoulos, Dimitrios Katsaros, Yannis Manolopoulos Comments: 27 pages, 10 figures, 11 tables. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1309.0277 Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph) Regards Andrea -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Tue Sep 23 13:03:49 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:03:49 +0000 Subject: paper you might find interesting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear Andrea: Thanks for sending the link to the article by Sidiropoulos et al. I am sending a copy to my colleagues Sasha Pudovkin in St. Petersburg and David Pendlebury in Oregon and hope they may find time to comment. All the best. Gene ________________________________ From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrea Scharnhorst Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:21 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] paper you might find interesting arXiv:1409.6099 [pdf, ps, other] Identification of Influential Scientists vs. Mass Producers by the Perfectionism Index Antonis Sidiropoulos, Dimitrios Katsaros, Yannis Manolopoulos Comments: 27 pages, 10 figures, 11 tables. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1309.0277 Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph) Regards Andrea -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cassidysugimoto at GMAIL.COM Wed Sep 24 15:43:10 2014 From: cassidysugimoto at GMAIL.COM (Cassidy Sugimoto) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:43:10 -0400 Subject: PhD Fellowships in Scholarly Communication Message-ID: The School of Informatics and Computing at Indiana University Bloomington seeks to recruit a cohort of four exceptional doctoral students with interest in issues related to scholarly communication for the IDEASc fellowship program, funded by the Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS) and hosted by the Department of Information and Library Science (ILS) and the University Libraries at Indiana University Bloomington (IUB). IDEASc ? Integrated Doctoral Education with Application to Scholarly Communication ? is a fellowship program designed to further scholarship and practice in the area of scholarly communication by integrating practical experience in the library with the research and classroom experiences that comprise the traditional education of doctoral students. Fellows will be provided with intensive mentoring, wide-ranging opportunities to work and conduct research in scholarly communication, and comprehensive training in pedagogy, curricular development, and in-class instruction. Our efforts are motivated by an awareness of the complex transformations of library roles in the scholarly communication environment and the increasing need to educate future LIS faculty with an integrated understanding of research and practice to meet the needs of future MLS students. Doctoral fellows will receive a stipend of $23,000, health insurance, tuition, travel assistance, and funding for publication in an open access journal for three consecutive years as part of this program. They will also have an opportunity to work in the library with experienced and innovative librarians and with leading faculty studying the diverse range of issues related to scholarly communication. Potential topics of interest include, but are not limited to, digital libraries, scientometrics, intellectual property, metadata, social media metrics, university presses, data curation, digital humanities, scholarly publishing, institutional repositories, and copyright. Additional information can be found on the project website: http:info.ils.indiana.edu/IDEASc Indiana University Bloomington is particularly well-situated to support this proposal given its campus-wide focus on issues of scholarly communication as well as the strengths of both the Indiana University Bloomington Libraries and the Department of Information and Library Science in this domain. This is a time of systemic change in how institutions create, sustain, and provide access to information, and libraries and LIS professionals are uniquely situated to influence the direction of this change. The project will graduate doctoral students who are not only familiar with issues of scholarly communication but will also, as leaders in the field, understand scholarly communication from the varying perspectives of practice, education, and research. Applicants will need to apply to and meet the requirements for the ILS Ph.D. program. Information on the Ph.D. application process can be found on the departmental website (http://ils.indiana.edu/phd/). Students will additionally be asked to send their personal statement, writing sample, and CV/resume directly to Dr. Cassidy R. Sugimoto (sugimoto [at] indiana.edu). *Applications should be received by January 1, 2015 for full consideration.* -- Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD Assistant Professor School of Informatics and Computing Indiana University Bloomington http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maxima.bolanos at UC3M.ES Fri Sep 26 07:43:04 2014 From: maxima.bolanos at UC3M.ES (=?UTF-8?B?TcOheGltYSBCb2xhw7Fvcy1QaXphcnJv?=) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:43:04 +0200 Subject: Fwd: Conferencia Peter Ingwersen. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Campus Getafe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: El profesor Peter Ingwersen de la Royal School of Library and Information Science de la Universidad de Copenhague dar? una conferencia el d?a 1 de octubre a las 12 horas en la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, campus de Getafe. La conferencia tendr? lugar en el aula multimedia Buero Vallejo, 14.0.11 y el tema es: "Selected critical examples of scientometric publication analysis". Aquellas personas que no puedan asistir podr?n seguir la retransmisi?n en steaming https://arcamm.uc3m.es/arcamm/uc3mtv/directo.php?ID=41 Pod?is encontrar m?s informaci?n en: http://www.inaecu.com/event/conferencia-selected-critical-examples-of-scientometric-publication-analysis/ -- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Biblioteconom?a y Documentaci?n. C/ Madrid, 126- Despacho 14.2.33 28903- Getafe (Madrid) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Sun Sep 28 15:51:54 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:51:54 +0000 Subject: Papers of possible interest to readers of the SIG-Metrics List Message-ID: Search terms matched: IMPACT FACTOR(1); S(1); TO(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341281300015 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Using Altmetrics and Social Media *to* Supplement *Impact Factor*: Maximizing Your Article'*s* Academic and Societal Impact Authors: Cress, PE Author Full Names: Cress, Phaedra E. Source: AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 34 (7):1123-1126; 10.1177/1090820X14542973 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Addresses: E-mail Addresses: phaedra at surgery.org Cited Reference Count: 5 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA ISSN: 1090-820X eISSN: 1527-330X Web of Science Categories: Surgery Research Areas: Surgery IDS Number: AO4BN Unique ID: WOS:000341281300015 Cited References: Swanson E., 2013, Aesthetic Surg J., V33, P835 Arnold D. N., 2011, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, V58, P434 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Stevens WG, 2013, Aesthetic Surg J., V33, P1065 Thelwall Mike, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, ===================================================================Search terms matched: IMPACT FACTOR(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341189000003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Facts Are More Important Than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences Authors: Makel, MC; Plucker, JA Author Full Names: Makel, Matthew C.; Plucker, Jonathan A. Source: EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 43 (6):304-316; 10.3102/0013189X14545513 AUG-SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: assessment, content analysis, educational policy, evaluation, replication, research methodology KeyWords Plus: FILE DRAWER PROBLEM; PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH; JOURNAL EDITORS; PUBLICATION DECISIONS; SPECIAL SECTION; VICE-VERSA; AGAIN; BIAS; REPLICABILITY; INCENTIVES Abstract: Despite increased attention to methodological rigor in education research, the field has focused heavily on experimental design and not on the merit of replicating important results. The present study analyzed the complete publication history of the current top 100 education journals ranked by 5-year *impact factor* and found that only 0.13% of education articles were replications. Contrary to previous findings in medicine, but similar to psychology, the majority of education replications successfully replicated the original studies. However, replications were significantly less likely to be successful when there was no overlap in authorship between the original and replicating articles. The results emphasize the importance of third-party, direct replications in helping education research improve its ability to shape education policy and practice. Addresses: [Makel, Matthew C.] Duke Univ, Talent Identificat Program, Durham, NC 27701 USA. [Plucker, Jonathan A.] Univ Connecticut, Neag Sch Educ, Storrs, CT 06269 USA. E-mail Addresses: mmakel at tip.duke.edu; jonathan.plucker at uconn.edu Cited Reference Count: 124 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA ISSN: 0013-189X eISSN: 1935-102X Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research Research Areas: Education & Educational Research IDS Number: AO2WY Unique ID: WOS:000341189000003 Cited References: KLEIN EB, 1969, JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V33, P128 Johnson Valen E., 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V110, P19313 CICCHETTI DV, 1991, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, V14, P119 DEWALD WG, 1986, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V76, P587 NEULIEP JW, 1990, JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, V5, P85 LeBel Etienne P., 2011, REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, V15, P371 NEULIEP JW, 1993, JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, V8, P21 LINDSAY RM, 1993, AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, V47, P217 Kelly C. W., 1979, Human Communication Research, V5, P338 Williams Simon Nicholas, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P801 Makel Matthew C., 2014, PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, V8, P2 Pigott Therese D., 2013, EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, V42, P424 Anderson R. G., 2005, Working paper, Peters Charles C., 1938, JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, V32, P3 Schimmack Ulrich, 2012, PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, V17, P551 Alexander Anita, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P657 Fanelli Daniele, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, OSTROM TM, 1971, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V26, P312 Frank Michael C., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P600 Makel Matthew C., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P537 LYKKEN DT, 1968, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V70, P151 Agresti A., 2007, An introduction to categorical data analysis, TUKEY JW, 1969, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V24, P83 Campbell D., 1963, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, Cesario Joseph, 2014, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V9, P40 Plucker JA, 2004, EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, V39, P83 KERR S, 1977, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V20, P132 Fanelli Daniele, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P891 Ioannidis JPA, 2005, PLOS MEDICINE, V2, P696 [Anonymous], 2010, Lancet, V375, P445 Yong Ed, 2012, NATURE, V485, P298 Pashler Harold, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P528 Van Noorden Richard, 2011, NATURE, V478, P26 STERLING TD, 1959, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, V54, P30 Brandt Mark J., 2014, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V50, P217 KING G, 1995, PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, V28, P444 Whitehurst G., 2003, The Institute of Education Sciences: New wine, new bottles. A presentation by IES director Grover (Russ) Whitehurst, ROSENTHA.R, 1967, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V67, P356 Hubbard R, 1996, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, V35, P153 TARNOWSKI KJ, 1990, JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V58, P240 John Leslie K., 2012, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V23, P524 Spellman Barbara A., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P58 Lewandowsky Stephan, 2012, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, V13, P106 McBee M. T., 2014, Journal of Advanced Academics, V25, P68 FURCHTGOTT E, 1984, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V39, P1315 Hansen William B., 2011, PREVENTION SCIENCE, V12, P118 Kerr N L, 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, V2, P196 Cumming Geoff, 2014, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V25, P7 COHEN J, 1994, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGISTSaul B Sells Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award, Society-of-Multivariate-Experimental-Psychology, OCT 29, 1993, SAN PEDRO, CA, V49, P997 KANE EJ, 1984, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, V23, P3 Simons D. J., 2014, APS Observer, V27, P16 Ioannidis John P. A., 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1230 Schmidt Stefan, 2009, REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, V13, P90 Simmons Joseph P., 2011, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V22, P1359 Bakker Marjan, 2011, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V43, P666 Ioannidis JPA, 2005, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V294, P218 Bissell Mina, 2013, NATURE, V503, P333 Fryer Roland G., Jr., 2011, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V126, P1755 Maxwell SE, 2004, PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, V9, P147 Valentine Jeffrey C., 2011, PREVENTION SCIENCE, V12, P123 LASORTE MA, 1972, SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, V13, P218 [Anonymous], 2012, Perspectives on Psychological Science., Begley C. Glenn, 2012, NATURE, V483, P531 Yuan Kun, 2013, EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, V35, P3 Rosenthal R., 1966, Experimenter effects in behavioral research, PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, V5, P187 GOLDEN MA, 1995, PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, V28, P481 Wagenmakers Eric-Jan, 2011, JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V100, P426 BAKAN D, 1966, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V66, P423 Ioannidis John P. A., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P645 Eich R., 2014, Psychological Science, V25, P3 Hubbard R., 1994, International Journal of Research in Marketing, V11, P233 What Works Clearinghouse, 2013, Home page, Prinz Florian, 2011, NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, V10, P712 Pashler Harold, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P531 Klein R. A., 2013, Investigating variation in replicability: The many labs replication project, NEULIEP JW, 1993, JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, V8, P1 Bem Daryl J., 2011, JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V100, P407 Sagan C., 1997, The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark, STERLING TD, 1995, AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, V49, P108 Crocker Jennifer, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1182 Levitt S. D., 2011, The impact of short-term incentives on student performance, Powell Kendall, 2007, PLOS BIOLOGY, V5, P2748 Jones Keith S., 2010, HUMAN FACTORS, V52, P586 Simons D. J., 2012, Psychologist, V25, P349 Ritchie Stuart J., 2012, PSYCHOLOGIST, V25, P346 Ioannidis JPA, 2005, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V294, P2696 KRUSKAL W, 1989, AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, V43, P2 Hornig Mady, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, Madden CS, 1995, JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, V24, P77 ROZEBOOM WW, 1960, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V57, P416 Tomasello Michael, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1227 LOEVINGE.J, 1968, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V23, P455 Roediger H. L., 2012, Academic Observer, LUBIN A, 1957, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V12, P519 ROSENTHA.R, 1969, JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V33, P7 Peng Roger D., 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1226 Jasny Barbara R., 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1225 Evanschitzky Heiner, 2007, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, V60, P411 ROTTON J, 1995, JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, V10, P1 Grahe Jon E., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P605 Makel Matthew C., 2014, PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, V8, P27 Schlosberg Harold, 1951, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V6, P177 Schooler Jonathan, 2011, NATURE, V470, P437 de Winter Joost, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Wagenmakers Eric-Jan, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P632 Bakker Marjan, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P543 Winters BA, 1996, LIBRARY ACQUISITIONS-PRACTICE AND THEORY, V20, P391 Fryer R. G., 2013, Journal of Labor Economics, V31, P273 AHLGREN A, 1969, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V24, P471 Ryan Michael J., 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1229 ROSENTHAL R, 1979, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V86, P638 LEVY LH, 1969, JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V33, P15 Rhine J. B., 1997, Extra- sensory perception, MEIER KJ, 1995, PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, V28, P662 Taylor B, 1999, LANCET, V353, P2026 Hartshorne Joshua K., 2012, FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, V6, Carpenter Siri, 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P1558 Collins H. M., 1985, Changing order, Eden D, 2002, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V45, P841 Nosek Brian A., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P615 Cole S., 1992, Making science: Between nature and society, McBee Matthew T., 2014, PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, V8, P8 National Reading Panel, 1999, Teaching children to read: An evidence- based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, =================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341233600002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A probe into the citation patterns of high-quality and high-impact publications Authors: Li, J; Ye, FY Author Full Names: Li, Jiang; Ye, Fred Y. Source: MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, 19 (2):17-33; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citation analysis, Citation pattern, Citation curve, Sleeping-beauty, Obsolescence KeyWords Plus: SLEEPING BEAUTIES; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; OBSOLESCENCE; SCIENCE; AGE; DOCUMENTATION; PREMATURITY; GENETICS; MODEL Abstract: Enlightened by Avramescu's studies, we classified the citation patterns of high-quality and high-impact publicationsinto five mathematical types: lognormal-type, exponential-type, polynomial-type, wave-type and sleeping-beauty. Based on practical datasets of high-quality and high-impact publications, the five types of citation patterns are fitted well at statistical level. The results reveal that high-quality publications usually appear irregular citation curves (wave-type and sleeping-beauty) and high-impact publications tend to show regular ones (lognormal-type, exponential-type and polynomial-type). Addresses: [Li, Jiang] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Informat Resource Management, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. [Ye, Fred Y.] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: yye at nju.edu.cn Cited Reference Count: 35 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: UNIV MALAYA, FAC COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECH, UNIV MALAYA, FAC COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECH, KUALA LUMPUR, 50603, MALAYSIA ISSN: 1394-6234 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AO3MH Unique ID: WOS:000341233600002 Cited References: Barher B., 1961, Science, V134, P596 Amin M., 2000, Perspectives in Publishing, V1, P1 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 van Raan AFJ, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P467 Burrell QL, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P381 EGGHE L, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICS, V27, P195 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, WYATT HV, 1975, PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, V18, P149 Bouabid Hamid, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P199 Mingers John, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1451 GARFIELD E, 1989, CURRENT CONTENTS, V38, P3 LINE MB, 1974, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V30, P283 Sangam SL, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS, V44, P33 Glanzel W, 2004, SCIENTIST, V18, P8 Glanzel W, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics, AUG, 2003, Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA, V60, P511 Egghe Leo, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1637 Burrell QL, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V53, P309 Pollmann T, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P43 Braun Tibor, 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P195 Garwin L., 2003, A century of 'Nature': Twenty-One discoveries that changed science and the world, GUPTA U, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P282 Rao I. K. R., 1991, Third International Conference on Informetrics, Aug. 9-12, Bangalore India, STENT GS, 1972, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, V227, P84 GRIFFITH BC, 1979, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V35, P179 Li Jiang, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P795 Cunningham S. J., 1995, Working paper 95/16, Gupta BM, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICS, V40, P139 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 EGGHE L, 1992, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V28, P201 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: its theory and applications in science, technology, and humanities, Nakamoto H., 1988, Informetrics87/88, P157 AVRAMESCU A, 1979, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V30, P296 COLE S, 1970, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V76, P286 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== . *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341023300005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: RANKING LAW JOURNALS AND THE LIMITS OF JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS Authors: Eisenberg, T; Wells, MT Author Full Names: Eisenberg, Theodore; Wells, Martin T. Source: ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 52 (4):1301-1314; 10.1111/ecin.12133 OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SCIENCE; IMPACT Abstract: Journal rankings published by Journal Citation Reports (JCR) are widely used to assess research quality, which influences important decisions by academic departments, universities, and countries in the allocation of research funds. We study refereed law journal rankings by JCR and Washington and Lee Law Library (W&L). JCR's rankings are uncorrelated with W&L's. The differences appear to be attributable to underrepresentation of law journals in JCR's database. We illustrate the effects of database bias on rankings through case studies of three elite journals, the Journal of Law and Economics, Supreme Court Review, and the American Law and Economics Review. Addresses: [Wells, Martin T.] Cornell Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA. E-mail Addresses: mtw1 at cornell.edu Cited Reference Count: 23 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0095-2583 eISSN: 1465-7295 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AO0SW Unique ID: WOS:000341023300005 Cited References: Westlaw Summary, 2012, Journals & Law Reviews Database, Westlaw, Eisenberg T, 2006, INDIANA LAW JOURNALSymposium on the Next Generation of Law School Rankings, APR 15, 2005, Bloomington, IN, V81, P285 Eisenberg Theodore, 2011, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, P1713 Davis Philip M., 2009, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V22, P5 Wouters P, 2000, WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD, P65 Meadows J, 2000, WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD, P87 Teles SM, 2008, RISE OF THE CONSERVATIVE LEGAL MOVEMENT: THE BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF THE LAW, P1 Thomson Reuters, 2012, Journal Citation Reports, Cronin B, 2000, WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD, P1 Australian Research Council (ARC), 2012, Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), 2012 Journal List, Eisenberg T, 1998, JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIESMeeting of the American-Law-and-Economics-Association, MAY 10-11, 1996, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, V27, P373 Cook R. D., 1982, Residuals and Influence in Regression, JCR, 2011, Journal Source Data, Moosa Imad, 2011, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, V51, P809 JCR, 2012, About Journal Citation Reports, GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Neuhaus Christoph, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P176 Currie Russell R., 2011, JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, V35, P7 Bao Yong, 2010, JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, V25, P345 Bergstrom C. T., 2006, The Economics of Scholarly Journal Publishing, Washington and Lee Law School, 2012, Law Journal: Submissions and Ranking, Braun T, 2000, WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD, P251 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341023300004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: IDENTIFYING THE EFFECT OF OPEN ACCESS ON CITATIONS USING A PANEL OF SCIENCE JOURNALS Authors: McCabe, MJ; Snyder, CM Author Full Names: McCabe, Mark J.; Snyder, Christopher M. Source: ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 52 (4):1284-1300; 10.1111/ecin.12064 OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: ACADEMIC JOURNALS; IMPACT; MODEL; HYPOTHESES; TRADE; COSTS; TESTS Abstract: An open-access journal allows free online access to its articles, obtaining revenue from fees charged to submitting authors or from institutional support. Using panel data on science journals, we are able to circumvent problems plaguing previous studies of the impact of open access on citations. In contrast to the huge effects found in these previous studies, we find a more modest effect: moving from paid to open access increases cites by 8% on average in our sample. The benefit is concentrated among top-ranked journals. In fact, open access causes a statistically significant reduction in cites to the bottom-ranked journals in our sample, leading us to conjecture that open access may intensify competition among articles for readers' attention, generating losers as well as winners. Addresses: [McCabe, Mark J.] Boston Univ, Dept Econ, Boston, MA 02215 USA. [McCabe, Mark J.] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA. [McCabe, Mark J.] SKEMA Business Sch, Sophia Antipolis, France. [Snyder, Christopher M.] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Econ, Hanover, NH 03755 USA. [Snyder, Christopher M.] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA. E-mail Addresses: mccabe at umich.edu; chris.snyder at dartmouth.edu Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0095-2583 eISSN: 1465-7295 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AO0SW Unique ID: WOS:000341023300004 Cited References: Murray Fiona, 2007, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATIONConference on Academic Science and Entrepreneurship, APR 01-02, 2005, Santa Fe, NM, V63, P648 FREEMAN C, 1994, CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V18, P463 DOSI G, 1988, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V26, P1120 Simcoe T., 2008, XTPQML: Stata Module to Estimate Fixed-Effects Poisson (Quasi-ML) Regression with Robust Standard Errors, Craig Iain D., 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P239 Elberse A., 2008, Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 07-015, Lewenstein B. V., 2008, British Medical Journal, V337, P568 DAVIDSON R, 1981, ECONOMETRICA, V49, P781 BLALOCK HM, 1966, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V31, P52 Wooldridge JM, 1999, JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, V90, P77 Walker T., 2004, Nature Web Focus, Bergstrom TC, 2001, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V15, P183 McCabe MJ, 2005, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW117th Annual Meeting of the American-Economic-Association, JAN 07, 2005, Philadelphia, PA, V95, P453 Young J. R., 2004, Chronicle of Higher Education, PA36 VUONG QH, 1989, ECONOMETRICA, V57, P307 McCabe Mark J., 2013, JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, V39, P11 Bergstrom CT, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V101, P897 Evans James A., 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P1025 Melitz MJ, 2003, ECONOMETRICA, V71, P1695 Brynjolfsson Erik, 2011, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V57, P1373 Brody T., 2004, D-Lib Magazine, V10, Dewatripont M., 2006, Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe, McCabe Mark J., 2007, B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, V7, Jeon Doh-Shin, 2010, AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, V2, P222 Lawrence S, 2001, NATURE, V411, P521 Chaney Thomas, 2008, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V98, P1707 Gans J. S., 2011, SSRN Working Paper Abstract Number 1559871, Fehder D. C., 2012, Working Paper, Eysenbach Gunther, 2006, PLOS BIOLOGY, V4, P692 [Anonymous], 2012, The Economist, Gaule Patrick, 2011, RESEARCH POLICY, V40, P1332 Davis Philip M., 2011, FASEB JOURNAL, V25, P2129 McCabe M. J., Review of Economics and Statistics, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341151500003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The British Nursing Index and CINAHL: a comparison of journal title coverage and the implications for information professionals Authors: Briscoe, S; Cooper, C Author Full Names: Briscoe, Simon; Cooper, Chris Source: HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 31 (3):195-203; 10.1111/hir.12069 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliographic databases, database searching, information science, Great Britain (GB), nursing literature Abstract: Objectives: This paper compares the journal coverage of the British Nursing Index (BNI) and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). The main objectives are to assess whether BNI is a useful source of UK publications and to consider the implications for information professionals. Methods: Lists of the journals indexed in BNI and CINAHL, CINAHL Plus and CINAHL Complete were compared. The date coverage and article entry date of a selection of UK nursing journals were also compared. Results: One hundred and fifty-nine journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with the basic version of CINAHL. Eighty-one journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL. Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. Conclusion: BNI is smaller than CINAHL, and BNI indexes a relatively small number of unique journals. An information professional with access to CINAHL Plus or CINAHL Complete could reasonably not search BNI for a nursing topic, particularly if the topic is not UK specific. UK nursing research is more likely to benefit from using BNI, although the acquisition of BNI by ProQuest could impact this finding. Addresses: [Briscoe, Simon; Cooper, Chris] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, PenTAG, Exeter, Devon, England. E-mail Addresses: S.Briscoe at exeter.ac.uk Cited Reference Count: 12 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 1471-1834 eISSN: 1471-1842 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AO2KV Unique ID: WOS:000341151500003 Cited References: GLUCK M, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P43 ProQuest, 2013, British Nursing Index, Beckles Zosia, 2013, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V66, P1051 Stokes Peter, 2009, HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, V26, P220 Cooper C., 2012, BMJ Open, V2, P1 CINAHL, 2005, History Then and Now, Subirana M, 2005, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V58, P20 Priddey D., 2010, Libraries for Nursing Bulletin, V30, P25 Badia G., 2011, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, V6, P71 Hill Barbarie, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V97, P313 ProQuest, 2011, ProQuest Acquires BNI, ProQuest, 2013, After Acquisition of BNI, ProQuest Expands This Key Resource's Access and Research Value, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341126600027 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The highly-cited Electrocardiogram-related articles in science citation index expanded: characteristics and hotspots Authors: Yang, XL; Gu, JJ; Yan, H; Xu, Z; Ren, B; Yang, YM; Yang, XD; Chen, Q; Tan, SH Author Full Names: Yang, Xianglin; Gu, Jiaojiao; Yan, Hong; Xu, Zhi; Ren, Bing; Yang, Yaming; Yang, Xiaodong; Chen, Qi; Tan, Shaohua Source: JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 47 (5):738-744; 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.03.005 SEP-OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: Bibliometric, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Highly-cited articles, Hotspots KeyWords Plus: BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY Abstract: We used bibliometric analysis methodology in the expanded Science Citation Index to identify highly-cited electrocardiogram (ECG)-related articles with total citations (TC2012) exceeding 100 from the publication year to 2012. Web of Science search tools were used to identify the highly-cited articles. The aspects analyzed for highly cited publications included effect of time on citation analysis, journals and Web of Science categories, number of authors per publication, originating institutions and countries, total citation and total citation per year life cycles of articles (C2012) and research hotspots. Results showed that a total of 467 electrocardiogram-related publications were regarded as the highly-cited publications. TC2012 ranged from 101 to 2879, with 215 as the average number of citations. No highly-cited publications have emerged yet during the first two years of the present 2010 Decade. All 11 countries and institutions originating highly-cited ECG-related publications were developed countries, USA in 9 of them. Four subject categories were identified as hotspots by total citations TC2012 and C2012: atrial fibrillation, long QT syndrome, angina and myocardial infarction, and risk factor analysis and health evaluation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Yang, Xianglin; Yang, Yaming; Tan, Shaohua] Peking Univ, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Machine Percept, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. [Yang, Xianglin; Yan, Hong; Xu, Zhi] China Astronaut Res & Training Ctr, State Key Lab Space Med Fundamentals & Applicat, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China. [Gu, Jiaojiao] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr & Food Hyg, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China. [Ren, Bing] 306th Hosp PLA, Aerosp City Dept, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China. [Yang, Xiaodong] Xidian Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Xian 710071, Peoples R China. [Chen, Qi] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Geriatr Cardiol Dept, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: yangxianglin at pku.edu.cn; jiaojiaogu442 at gmail.com Funding Acknowledgement: Research Funds of China space medical engineering [SJ200903, SJ201006]; State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Centre [SMFA12B09]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [K5051310004]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [61301175] Funding Text: Research was supported in part by Research Funds of China space medical engineering (SJ200903, SJ201006), State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Centre (SMFA12B09), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (K5051310004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61301175). Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS, CURTIS CENTER, INDEPENDENCE SQUARE WEST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3399 USA ISSN: 0022-0736 eISSN: 1532-8430 Web of Science Categories: Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems Research Areas: Cardiovascular System & Cardiology IDS Number: AO2DV Unique ID: WOS:000341126600027 Cited References: Moretti Alessandra, 2010, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V363, P1397 Hare Joshua M., 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, V54, P2277 Bazett HC, 1920, HEART-A JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF THE CIRCULATION, V7, P353 MARMOT MG, 1991, LANCET, V337, P1387 Einthoven W, 1913, PFLUGERS ARCHIV FUR DIE GESAMTE PHYSIOLOGIE DES MENSCHEN UND DER TIERE, V150, P275 Achenbach Stephan, 2010, EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, V31, P340 Berntson GG, 1997, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V34, P623 Taylor Allen J., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, V56, P1864 Fu Hui-Zhen, 2012, JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, V379, P148 TARAN LM, 1947, AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, V33, P14 Corrado Domenico, 2010, EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, V31, P243 BLACKBURN H, 1960, CIRCULATION, V21, P1160 Ma Jiupeng, 2013, ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, V70, P1039 Bazett HC, 1997, Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol, V2, P177 Topol EJ, 1996, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V335, P775 Ho Yuh-Shan, 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P137 Antman EM, 2000, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V284, P835 Chiu WT, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V63, P3 Ho Yuh-Shan, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P1297 Haissaguerre M, 1998, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V339, P659 Ho Yuh-Shan, 2012, CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, V20, P478 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341151500002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review Authors: Harbour, J; Fraser, C; Lefebvre, C; Glanville, J; Beale, S; Boachie, C; Duffy, S; McCool, R; Smith, L Author Full Names: Harbour, Jennifer; Fraser, Cynthia; Lefebvre, Carol; Glanville, Julie; Beale, Sophie; Boachie, Charles; Duffy, Steven; McCool, Rachael; Smith, Lynne Source: HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 31 (3):176-194; 10.1111/hir.12070 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: bibliographic databases, information storage and retrieval, methodological filters, precision, recall, review, literature KeyWords Plus: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; RETRIEVING SCIENTIFICALLY STRONG; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MEDLINE; STRATEGIES; ACCURACY; EMBASE Abstract: Background: Methodological search filters are tools for retrieving database records reporting studies which use a specific research method. Choosing a filter is likely to be based on filter performance data. This review examines which measures are reported, and the way that filter performance is presented, in filter comparisons. Methods: Studies were identified from the current content and pending update (2010) of a filter website. Eligible studies compared two or more methodological search filters designed to identify randomised controlled trials, diagnostic test accuracy studies, systematic reviews or economic evaluations. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The number of filters compared in a single study ranged from 2 to 38. The most commonly reported measures were sensitivity/recall and precision. All studies displayed results in tables and gave results as percentages or proportions. Two studies supplemented results tables with graphical displays of data: a bar graph of the proportion of retrieved and missed gold standard references per filter; a forest plot of the overall sensitivity and specificity of each filter. Conclusions: Sensitivity/recall and precision are the most frequently reported performance measures. This review highlights the potential for presenting results in novel and innovative ways to aid filter selection. Addresses: [Harbour, Jennifer; Smith, Lynne] Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Glasgow G1 2NP, Lanark, Scotland. [Fraser, Cynthia; Boachie, Charles] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland. [Lefebvre, Carol] Lefebvre Associates Ltd, Oxford, England. [Glanville, Julie; McCool, Rachael] York Hlth Econ Consortium Ltd, York, N Yorkshire, England. [Beale, Sophie] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England. [Duffy, Steven] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England. E-mail Addresses: jenny.harbour at nhs.net Cited Reference Count: 29 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 1471-1834 eISSN: 1471-1842 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AO2KV Unique ID: WOS:000341151500002 Cited References: Deurenberg Rikie, 2008, HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, V25, P23 Doust JA, 2005, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V58, P444 White VJ, 2001, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P357 Wong Sharon S. -L., 2006, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V94, P451 Wilczynski Nancy L., 2005, BMC MEDICINE, V3, Montori VM, 2005, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V330, P68 Boynton J, 1998, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P137 Royle Pamela, 2005, BMC medical research methodology, V5, P23 Bradley S. M., 2010, Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, V31, P27 McKibbon Kathleen Ann, 2009, HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, V26, P187 Haynes RB, 2004, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V328, P1040 Bachmann LM, 2002, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, V9, P653 Leeflang MMG, 2006, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V59, P234 Kastner Monika, 2009, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V62, P974 Deville WLJM, 2000, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V53, P65 Sampson Margaret, 2006, BMC medical research methodology, V6, P33 Corrao Salvatore, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, V13, P485 Boluyt Nicole, 2008, ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, V162, P111 Glanville Julie, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, V25, P522 Jenkins Michelle, 2004, Health information and libraries journal, V21, P148 Whiting Penny, 2011, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V64, P602 Glanville JM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V94, P130 Glanville J., 2009, Development and testing of search filters to identify economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE, Royle P, 2003, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, V19, P591 Bardia Aditya, 2006, INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, V5, P202 Glanville J., 2010, Evidence-based Decisions and Economics, P79 Manriquez Juan J., 2008, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V61, P407 Ritchie Gill, 2007, HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, V24, P188 Vincent Sam, 2003, Health information and libraries journal, V20, P150 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341088000005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Contemporary intellectual structure of CSCL research (2006-2013): a co-citation network analysis with an education focus Authors: Tang, KY; Tsai, CC; Lin, TC Author Full Names: Tang, Kai-Yu; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Lin, Tzu-Chiang Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 9 (3):335-363; 10.1007/s11412-014-9196-5 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL), Document co-citation analysis (DCA), Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Social network analysis (SNA), Literature review KeyWords Plus: SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ARGUMENTATION; KNOWLEDGE-CONSTRUCTION; AUTHOR COCITATION; MACRO-SCRIPTS; REPRESENTATIONAL GUIDANCE; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; ROLE ASSIGNMENT; FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; DIAGRAMS Abstract: This present study endeavors to discover the scholarly communication structure in the CSCL knowledge domain. To explore the intellectual structure of contemporary literature of CSCL research from 2006 to 2013, over a thousand research papers indexed in the leading journal publications and conference proceedings were retrieved from WOS. Accordingly, this paper adopted a series of methods to analyze these research articles from macro to micro level, including document co-citation analysis (DCA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and social network analysis (SNA). As a result, a total of 7,552 and 2,180 co-citation ties were obtained from 403 to 66 source papers, respectively. In addition, six intellectual subfields within the CSCL literature were extracted, namely: (1) representation, discourse & pattern, (2) factors influencing CSCL, (3) intervention and comparison, (4) critical reasoning, (5) process of social construction, and (6) design and modeling of CSCL. Central documents and publications within contemporary CSCL research were identified and presented in the undirected co-citation networks from both macro and micro perspectives. Furthermore, the dissemination of underlying subfields and pivotal documents serving as a boundary-spanning role were discussed. This is the very first attempt to integrate the bibliographical method, statistical analysis, and visualization techniques in relation to contemporary CSCL research. Further discussion and research directions for future CSCL study are provided. Addresses: [Tang, Kai-Yu; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Lin, Tzu-Chiang] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Digital Learning & Educ, Taipei 10607, Taiwan. E-mail Addresses: ky.nctu at gmail.com; cctsai at mail.ntust.edu.tw; angelo at mail.ntust.edu.tw Cited Reference Count: 112 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA ISSN: 1556-1607 eISSN: 1556-1615 Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Education & Educational Research; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AO1QK Unique ID: WOS:000341088000005 Cited References: Onrubia Javier, 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V7, P161 Meier Anne, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P63 van Aalst Jan, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009), JUN 08-13, 2009, Rhodes, GREECE, V4, P259 Di Stefano Giada, 2010, INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, V19, P1187 Chen Liang-Chu, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P867 Schwarz Baruch B., 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P297 de Laat Maarten, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P87 Carolan B. V., 2005, Educational Researcher, V34, P25 Nerur Sridhar P., 2008, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V29, P319 Lee Min-Hsien, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, V31, P1999 Jones Chris, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P35 Otte E, 2002, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V28, P441 Schellens T, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P349 Baker Michael, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P315 Baghaei Nilufar, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P159 Suthers Daniel D., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V5, P5 De Wever Bram, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P436 De Smet Marijke, 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V50, P207 Stahl Gerry, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P365 Kollar Ingo, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P708 Rose Carolyn, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P237 Acedo FJ, 2006, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V43, P957 Ramos-Rodriguez AR, 2004, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V25, P981 FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V1, P215 Lonchamp Jacques, 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V7, P475 Stegmann Karsten, 2012, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V40, P297 Reimann Peter, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009), JUN 08-13, 2009, Rhodes, GREECE, V4, P239 Borgman CL, 2002, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V36, P3 MCCAIN KW, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P433 Weinberger A, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P71 Erkens Gijsbert, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009), JUN 08-13, 2009, Rhodes, GREECE, V3, P447 Cakir Murat Perit, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P115 Lonchamp Jacques, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P247 Dillenbourg Pierre, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P5 Naidu S, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P96 Dillenbourg P., 2007, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, V23, P1 De Wever B., 2009, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, V25, P177 Stahl Gerry, 2006, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, P409 Asterhan Christa S. C., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V5, P259 Kobbe Lars, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P211 Lund Kristine, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P273 Ertl Bernhard, 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V51, P1599 Ding N., 2009, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V52, P509 Weinberger Armin, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P416 Arnseth Hans Christian, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P167 Tuire P., 2001, Higher Education, V42, P493 Wellman B., 1988, Social structures: A network approach, V2, Everton S. F., 2004, A guide for the visually perplexed: Visually representing social networks, Tchounikine Pierre, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P193 Mirza Nathalie Muller, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P247 Jermann Patrick, 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V51, P279 Schwarz Baruch B., 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P449 Schrire S, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P49 Tight Malcolm, 2008, HIGHER EDUCATION, V55, P593 Sharan Yael, 2010, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, V45, P300 De Laat Maarten, 2007, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V35, P257 Kienle Andrea, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P9 Isotani Seiji, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P445 Rourke Liam, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P105 Jeong Allan C., 2006, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V34, P367 KAMADA T, 1989, INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, V31, P7 van der Pol J., 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P339 Jeong Allan, 2007, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V48, P427 Janssen Jeroen, 2010, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V38, P59 Kapur Manu, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P21 Desmedt E., 2004, Educational Psychology, V24, P445 Schellens Tammy, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P225 Pilkington Alan, 2009, JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, V27, P185 White HD, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P423 Arvaja Maarit, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P133 De Wever Bram, 2010, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V20, P349 Cress Ulrike, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P69 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 van Aalst Jan, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCESInternational Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, JUN, 2003, Bergen, NORWAY, V16, P175 Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P348 Suthers Daniel D., 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P315 Scott J, 1991, Suthers Daniel D., 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V50, P1103 Scheuer Oliver, 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V5, P43 Cress Ulrike, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P105 Long Yuan, 2013, INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, V113, P605 White HD, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P327 De Wever B, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P6 Hsiao Chun Hua, 2011, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, V31, P128 Jonassen David H., 2010, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V58, P439 Prinsen F. R., 2009, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V52, P113 Van Arnelsvoort Marije, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, V16, P485 Strijbos Jan-Willem, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P389 Janssen Jeroen, 2007, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V49, P1037 Lin Tzu-Chiang, 2014, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, V36, P1346 Wessner M., 2007, Proceedings of the CSCL 2007: Mice, minds, and society, Tsai CC, 2005, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, V27, P3 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 SMALL H, 1974, SCIENCE STUDIES, V4, P17 FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, V21, P1129 Kirschner Paul A., 2013, EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, V48, P1 Acedo Francisco Jose, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V27, P621 Noroozi Omid, 2012, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V60, P193 Weigel F. K., 2013, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, V33, P15 Hernandez-Leo D, 2006, EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, V9, P58 Strijbos JW, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P29 Wasserman Stanley, 1994, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Borgatti SP, 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis, KAISER HF, 1974, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V39, P31 WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 Hamalainen Raija, 2010, TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, V26, P871 Peteraf Margaret, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V34, P1389 Stegmann Karsten, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P421 Stahl G., 2002, Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Uysal Oezguer Oezmen, 2010, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, V93, P137 Hoadley C. M., 2005, Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: Learning 2005: the next 10 years!, P205 Kienle Andrea, 2005, CSCL 2005: COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING 2005: THE NEXT 10 YEARS, PROCEEDINGSInternational Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, MAY 30-JUN 04, 2005, Taipei, TAIWAN, P262 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341068100001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Highly cited papers in Medical Physics Authors: Eaton, DJ Author Full Names: Eaton, David J. Source: MEDICAL PHYSICS, 41 (8):43-44; AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material KeyWords Plus: CT; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; IMAGES Addresses: Mt Vernon Hosp, Natl Radiotherapy Trials QA Grp, London HA6 2RN, England. Cited Reference Count: 19 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: AMER ASSOC PHYSICISTS MEDICINE AMER INST PHYSICS, STE 1 NO 1, 2 HUNTINGTON QUADRANGLE, MELVILLE, NY 11747-4502 USA ISSN: 0094-2405 Article Number: 080401 Web of Science Categories: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Research Areas: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging IDS Number: AO1JJ Unique ID: WOS:000341068100001 Cited References: Keall Paul J., 2006, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V33, P3874 ZUBAL IG, 1994, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V21, P299 HENKELMAN RM, 1985, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V12, P232 Allen Heidi G., 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, FARRELL TJ, 1992, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V19, P879 BOTTOMLEY PA, 1984, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V11, P425 Mayor Susan, 2006, BMJ (Clinical research ed.), V332, P1353 Low DA, 1998, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V25, P656 MACKIE TR, 1993, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V20, P1709 SIDDON RL, 1985, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V12, P252 Corbyn Z., 2010, Nat. News, Thibault Jean-Baptiste, 2007, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V34, P4526 ROGERS DWO, 1995, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V22, P503 NATH R, 1995, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V22, P209 Patterson MS, 2004, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V31, P682 Rivard MJ, 2004, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V31, P633 Otto Karl, 2008, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V35, P310 Chen Guang-Hong, 2008, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V35, P660 Kawrakow I, 2000, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V27, P485 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341062300020 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Open Access Journals: Open for Rich, Closed for Poor Authors: Meo, SA Author Full Names: Meo, Sultan Ayoub Source: JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 24 (8):611-611; AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Letter Addresses: King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Physiol, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia. E-mail Addresses: sultanmeo at hotmail.com Cited Reference Count: 4 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: COLL PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS PAKISTAN, SEVENTH CENTRAL ST, DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, KARACHI, 75500, PAKISTAN ISSN: 1022-386X eISSN: 1681-7168 Web of Science Categories: Medicine, General & Internal Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine IDS Number: AO1HD Unique ID: WOS:000341062300020 Cited References: Bjork Bo-Christer, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Van Noorden Richard, 2013, NATURE, V495, P426 DOJA, 2013, News, Bio Medical Central, 2013, How much is bio-medical central charging?, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341248000003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of citation publishing in an open access journal (CytoJournal) compared to traditional cytopathology journals - A five year (2007-2011) experience Authors: Frisch, NK; Nathan, R; Ahmed, YK; Shidham, VB Author Full Names: Frisch, Nora K.; Nathan, Romil; Ahmed, Yasin K.; Shidham, Vinod B. Source: CYTOJOURNAL, 11 10.4103/1742-6413.131739 APR 29 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citations, impact, open access, publication KeyWords Plus: FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS-CELLS; A-CASE-REPORT; HIGH-RISK HPV; INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; CERVICOVAGINAL MELANOMA THINPREP; CONVENTIONAL PAPANICOLAOU TESTS; NON-GYNECOLOGIC CYTOPATHOLOGY; CYTO-HISTOLOGICAL CORRELATION Abstract: Background: The era of Open Access (OA) publication, a platform which serves to better disseminate scientific knowledge, is upon us, as more OA journals are in existence than ever before. The idea that peer-reviewed OA publication leads to higher rates of citation has been put forth and shown to be true in several publications. This is a significant benefit to authors and is in addition to another relatively less obvious but highly critical component of the OA charter, i.e. retention of the copyright by the authors in the public domain. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional non-OA publications specifically for authors in the field of cytopathology. Design: We compared the citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Citations in an OA publication (CytoJournal) were analyzed comparatively with traditional non-OA cytopathology journals (Acta Cytologica, Cancer Cytopathology, Cytopathology, and Diagnostic Cytopathology) using the data from web of science citation analysis site (based on which the impact factors (IF) are calculated). After comparing citations per publication, as well as a time adjusted citation quotient (which takes into account the time since publication), we also analyzed the statistics after excluding the data for meeting abstracts. Results: Total 28 authors published 314 publications as articles and meeting abstracts (25 authors after excluding the abstracts). The rate of citation and time adjusted citation quotient were higher for OA in the group where abstracts were included (P < 0.05 for both). The rates were also slightly higher for OA than non-OA when the meeting abstracts were excluded, but the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.57 and P = 0.45). Conclusion : We observed that for the same author, the publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of citation than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology over a 5 year period (2007-2011). However, this increase was statistically insignificant if the meeting abstracts were excluded from the analysis. Overall, the rates of citation for OA and non-OA were slightly higher to comparable. Addresses: [Frisch, Nora K.] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Karmanos Canc Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA. Old Hutzel Hosp, Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA. E-mail Addresses: nfrisch at med.wayne.edu; romilnathan at gmail.com; yahme at med.wayne.edu; vshidham at med.wayne.edu Cited Reference Count: 323 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD, B-9, KANARA BUSINESS CENTRE, OFF LINK RD, GHAKTOPAR-E, MUMBAI, 400075, INDIA ISSN: 0974-5963 eISSN: 1742-6413 Article Number: 10 Web of Science Categories: Pathology Research Areas: Pathology IDS Number: AO3QG Unique ID: WOS:000341248000003 Cited References: Okonda Sylvain, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Monaco Sara E., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Iyer V., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P410 Hitchcock Thomas, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P376 Singh S., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P260 Crowe Amanda, 2011, CytoJournal, V8, P2 Bean Sarah M., 2011, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V119, P37 Gupta Nalini, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P920 Hoda Rana S., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P621 Ahuja A., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P276 Mathur S. R., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P471 Thrall Michael, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY54th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American-Society-of-Cytopathology, NOV 03-08, 2006, Toronto, CANADA, V111, P217 Arora Raman, 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P907 Gilbert Christopher M., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P398 AJIT D, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOL S, V114, P446 Gupta Prabodh K., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Khalbuss Walid E., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P431 Davis-Devine S, 2008, Cytojournal, V6, P4 Taniyama Kiyomi, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P489 Park Jason Y., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P806 Brimo Fadi, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P224 Thrall Michael J., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Panetti Christine, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P397 Zhao Chengquan, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P366 Shidham Vinod B., 2012, CYTOJOURNAL, V9, Khayyata Said, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P178 Shah Sejal S., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Nayak A., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P50 Arora Vinod K., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P509 Jin Bo, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P483 Henninger Brooke, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P373 Yakoushina Tatiana V., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P738 Baloch Zubair W., 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGYNational-Cancer-Institute Conference on Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science, OCT 22-23, 2007, Bethesda, MD, V36, P425 Mathur Sandeep R., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P63 Thrall Michael J., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Henninger Brooke, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P357 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P75 Jhala Darshana, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P416 Arabi Haitham, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P715 Gargouri Yassine, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Gupta Ruchika, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P531 Kamat S., 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P372 Chivukula Mamatha, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P333 Gupta Ruchika, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Hoda R. S., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P369 Goulart Robert A., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P428 Mead Kristen, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P351 Kocjan G., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P86 Smith GD, 2010, CytoJournal, V7, P3 Shidham Vinod B, 2006, CytoJournal, V3, P5 Wagner David G., 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P730 Hoda Rana, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P337 Layfield Lester J., 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P273 Monaco Sara E., 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P657 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Beraki E., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P414 Leiman G., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P386 Auger M., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P371 Deschenes Majorie, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P904 Gopal Krishan, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P234 Jin Bo, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P925 Saleh Husain A., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P324 Kumar Rajiv, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P868 Pantanowitz Liron, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P65 Rekhi Bharat, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Uke M., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P56 Kapali Malathy, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P26 Rekhi Bharat, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P546 Kastenbaum Hannah A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P403 Pantanowitz Liron, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P181 Michelow P., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P86 Anshu, 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P147 Steele Lucinda A., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P358 Gupta R., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P592 Rekhi B., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P343 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P306 Ponce-Camacho Marco A., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Al-Abbadi Mousa A., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Teman Carolin J., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P379 Gupta Shilpa, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P94 Kushner Yael B., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P447 Ebeltoft K., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P442 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P135 Thrall Michael J., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P407 Kurtz MJ, 2005, Inf Process Manage, V41, Pinco Jeffrey, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P430 Orellana Maria E., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P59 Domfeh Akosua B., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P364 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Kanbour-Shakir Amal, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P345 Zhao Chengquan, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P383 Halloush R. A., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P44 Deschenes Majorie, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P149 Barboza-Quintana Oralia, 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P424 Layfield L. J., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P75 Brimo Fadi, 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P721 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P424 Assaad Margaret, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P397 Baloch Zubair W., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Michelow Pam, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P218 Firnhaber Cynthia, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P10 Brimo Fadi, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P836 Razack R., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P407 Palmieri Beniamino, 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P691 Pantanowitz Liron, 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Shidham Vinod B., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Jian Bo, 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Leung Allen H., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P408 Meara R. S., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P192 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P263 Yakoushina Tatiana V., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P392 Smith Debora, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P342 Kandil D., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P331 Bandyopadhyay Sudeshna, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P379 Smith G. Denice, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P409 Loukeris Kristina, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P37 Bongiovanni Massimo, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P185 Yang Huaitao, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P321 Johnykutty Sharlin, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P763 Austin R. Marshall, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P65 Alkuwari E., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P284 Mathur Sandeep R., 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P740 Laucirica Rodolfo, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P359 Austin R. Marshall, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Renshaw Andrew A., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P180 Smith G. Denice, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P56 Steciuk M., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P130 Thrall Michael J., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY55th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American-Society-of-Cytopathology, NOV 02-06, 2007, Houston, TX, V114, P171 Zhao Chengquan, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P369 Alsharif Mariam, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P408 Young Nancy A., 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P277 Gupta Ruchika, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P504 Kalra Sonali, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P193 Khurana A., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P380 Goulart Robert A., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P364 Sauer Torill, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Saleh Husain A., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, O'Connor S. M., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P375 Alkuwari E, 2008, Cancer, V114, P89 David Doina, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P81 Iyer V., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P415 Gupta R., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P66 Karimzadeh M., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P279 Khalbuss Walid E., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P670 Zhao Chengquan, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P292 Khayyata Said, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P441 Saleh Husain A., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P437 Walsh Beth, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P381 Kastenbaum Hannah A., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Setia Namrata, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Avant C. C., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P503 Chitragar Sanjeev, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Austin R. Marshal, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P386 Arora Raman, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Saleh Husain A., 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P323 Taniyama Kiyomi, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P388 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P364 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P963 Yildiz-Aktas Isil Z., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Monaco Sara E., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P388 Purgina Bibianna, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Henry C. Amber, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P430 Freund Gregory G., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P370 Wagner David G., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P633 Iyer V., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P416 Bakdounes Khdoun, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P503 Barboza-Quintana Oralia, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P819 VanDyke Jessica, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P391 Fischer Andrew, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P307 Bofin Anna M., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P210 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P405 Sharma Sonal, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P1078 Michelow P., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P330 Austin R. Marshall, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Heider Amer, 2011, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V55, P48 Nayak Anupma, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P563 Naqvi Asghar H., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Thrall Michael J., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P354 Austin R. Marshall, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P783 Austin R. Marshall, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P387 Craig Iain D., 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P239 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P406 [Anonymous], 2013, Minitab (Version 16), Brimo Fadi, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P311 Khalbuss Walid E., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Srinivasan Radhika, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P128 Jhala Nirag, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P249 Dubb Michelle, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA46th Congress of the Federation-of-South-African-Societies-of-Pathology, JUL 02-05, 2006, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V53, P179 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P283 Sharma M., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P180 Gupta R., 2009, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V20, P130 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P402 Hanson Joshua, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P377 Schwartz Mary, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P317 Dubb Michelle, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P683 Saleh Husain A., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P184 Sigamani E., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P398 Hollowell Monica L., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P607 Saleh Husain A., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Arava S., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P342 Gomez-Macias G. S., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Gao Faye F., 2011, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V55, P302 Dubb Michelle, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P679 Shi Yuquan, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Blunier Travis E., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P380 Eilers Stan, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P347 Michelow Pam, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Setia Namrata, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P391 Gupta Shilpa, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P843 D'Amore Krista L., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P385 Shidham Vinod B., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P390 Auger Marion, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P414 Rong Rong, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P381 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P383 Michelow P., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P497 Rekhi Bharat, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P136 Pantanowitz Liron, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P236 Moriarty Ann T., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P350 Gupta Ruchika, 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P201 Modem Rukmini R., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P584 Roy Paromita, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P794 Sauer T., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P309 Saleh Husain A., 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P313 Smith G. Denice, 2011, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V55, P576 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P435 Khalbuss Walid E., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P586 Gupta Ruchika, 2010, CytoJournal, V6, P25 Saleh Husain A., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P439 Kaplan Jennifer S., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P459 Gao Faye F., 2011, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V119, P377 Agarwal S., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P65 Neethling G., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P398 Shidham Vinod B., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Baloch Zubair W., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P370 Warner Julieann N., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P398 Russell Donna K., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P398 Austin R. Marshall, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P345 Neumann Thomas, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P473 Knight Carrie S., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P359 Wang Yinong, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P272 Pantanowitz Liron, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P159 Gilbert Christopher M, 2011, CytoJournal, V8, P7 Flanangan Melina B., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P387 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Khalbuss Walid E., 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P24 Agarwal S., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P133 Baloch ZW, 2008, Cytojournal, V5, Auger M., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P274 Gupta Sampada, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P517 Harnad S, 2004, D-Lib Mag, V10, Deng Fang-Ming, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P435 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P249 Zhao Chengquan, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P242 Setia Namrata, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Gupta C., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P414 Gupta Nalini, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P203 Snowden Cindi, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P409 Assaad Margaret W., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P705 Filomena Carol, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P306 Apewokin S., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P345 Monaco Sara E., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P338 Sauer T., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P287 Gupta Ruchika, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P377 Eltoum I. A., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P143 Modem Rukmini, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P399 Kandil Dina, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY96th Annual Meeting of the United-States-and-Canadian-Academy-of-Pathology, MAR 24-30, 2007, San Diego, CA, V111, P316 Austin R. Marshall, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P749 Khalbuss Walid, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P380 Lawrence S, 2001, NATURE, V411, P521 Ruben Irene, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P217 Ducatman Barbara S., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P352 Kuperman Michael B., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P361 Michelow Pam, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P395 Smith G. Denice, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P367 Kanbour-Shakir Amal, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P315 Das Prasenjit, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P1089 Saleh Husain, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P130 Arya Payam, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Rekhi Bharat, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P827 Harzing AW., 2007, Publish or perish, Renshaw Andrew A., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Faquin William C., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P731 Wagner David G., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P396 Sauer Torill, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Smith G. Denice, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P902 Beraki Elsa, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Zhao Chengquan, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA96th Annual Meeting of the United-States-and-Canadian-Academy-of-Pathology, MAR 24-30, 2007, San Diego, CA, V53, P153 Auger Manon, 2011, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V119, P357 Das P., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P251 Lang Tee U., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Gupta Ruchika, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P884 Yakoushina Tatiana V., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Khalbuss Walid E., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P834 Smith G. Denice, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P361 Collins Brian T., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P440 Agarwal S., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P318 Layfield Lester J., 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P238 Deveci M. Salih, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P579 Griffin Adrienne Carruth, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Dubb Michelle, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P183 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000328649000004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries Authors: Astrom, F; Hansson, J Author Full Names: Astrom, Fredrik; Hansson, Joacim Source: JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 45 (4):316-322; 10.1177/0961000612456867 DEC 2013 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Academic libraries, bibliometrics, profession, research evaluation, role of libraries, librarianship KeyWords Plus: AUTHOR COCITATION Abstract: This article discusses potential consequences of implementing bibliometrics as an institutionalized practice in academic libraries. Results are reported from a survey among libraries in Sweden with organized bibliometric activities. Incorporating bibliometric activities is one way of redefining and widening the role of the library. Implementation of bibliometric practice is motivated by ambitions to provide more complete scholarly communication-related services, as well as to increase the visibility and status of libraries. Underlying reasons are professional competencies such as metadata and bibliographic database management; and bibliometrics being strong within library and information science. Incorporating bibliometrics in academic libraries is also seen as a way of widening the professional profile of librarianship. The new role should, however, also be considered from the viewpoint of potential changes in how academic libraries are perceived when incorporating a monitoring function through bibliometric analyses of research performance in addition to traditional service-oriented functions. Addresses: [Astrom, Fredrik] Lund Univ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden. [Hansson, Joacim] Linnaeus Univ, S-35195 Vaxjo, Sweden. E-mail Addresses: joacim.hansson at lnu.se Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 2 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND ISSN: 0961-0006 eISSN: 1741-6477 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: 275BA Unique ID: WOS:000328649000004 Cited References: PENDLEBURY DA, 2009, WHITEPAPER USING BIB, HANSSON J, 2010, LIB IDENTITY ROLE I, STROM F, 2007, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V58, P947 KISHIDA K, 1995, LIB INFORM SCI, V33, P39 White HD, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P327 NARIN F, 1977, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V12, P35 Nolin Jan, 2010, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V66, P7 AYRIS P, 2011, LIBER Q, V20, P332 BRENNAN P, 2008, 2008 LIB ASS C UNPUB, Vanclay Jerome K., 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P265 Ball R, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V66, P561 Whitley R., 2007, The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems, Wilson CS, 1999, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V34, P107 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 SCHREIBER T, 2006, BIBLIOTEKARERNE PROF, WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 CARLSSON H, 2008, INVENTERING BIBLIOME, Jimenez-Contreras E, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P198 DIKEMAN RK, 1975, PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V12, P55 GERRITSMA W, 2010, STI C, Nicholson S, 2003, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND LIBRARIES, V22, P146 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341021700170 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: CiteGraph: A Citation Network System for MEDLINE Articles and Analysis Authors: Zhang, Q; Yu, H Author Full Names: Zhang, Qing; Yu, Hong Edited by: Lehmann CU; Ammenwerth E; Nohr C Source: MEDINFO 2013: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2, 192 832-836; 10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-832 2013 Book Series: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 14th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics (MEDINFO) Conference Date: AUG 20-23, 2013 Conference Location: Copenhagen, DENMARK Author Keywords: Information Science, Information Storage and Retrieval, Databases, Bibliographic, MEDLINE KeyWords Plus: SCIENCE Abstract: This paper details the development and implementation of CiteGraph, a system for constructing large-scale citation and co-authorship networks from full-text biomedical articles. CiteGraph represents articles and authors by uniquely identified nodes, and connects those nodes through citation and co-authorship relations. CiteGraph network encompasses over 1.65 million full-text articles and 6.35 million citations by 1.37 million unique authors from the Elsevier full-text articles. Our evaluation shows 98%similar to 99% F1-score for mapping a citation to the corresponding article and identifying MEDLINE articles. We further analyzed the characteristics of CiteGraph and found that they are consistent with assumptions made using small-scale bibliometric analysis. We also developed several novel network-based methods for analyzing publication, citation and collaboration patterns. This is the first work to develop a completely automated system for the creation of a large-scale citation network in the biomedical domain, and also to introduce novel findings in researcher publication histories. CiteGraph can be a useful resource to both the biomedical community, and bibliometric research. Addresses: [Zhang, Qing] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA. E-mail Addresses: hong.yu at umassmed.edu Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: IOS PRESS, NIEUWE HEMWEG 6B, 1013 BG AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0926-9630 ISBN: 978-1-61499-289-9; 978-1-61499-288-2 Web of Science Categories: Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics Research Areas: Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics IDS Number: BB1DZ Unique ID: WOS:000341021700170 Cited References: Ng AY, 2001, Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P258 Csardi Gabor, 2007, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V374, P783 Zhang P, 2007, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, P123 Kleinberg J., 1999, Computing and Combinatorics, V1627, P1 Liu XM, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1462 Lempel R, 2000, COMPUTER NETWORKS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKING9th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW9), MAY 15-19, 2000, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, V33, P387 Nascimento MA, 2003, SIGMOD RECORD, V32, P8 Sen P, 2005, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONSInternational Conference on Statistical Physics, JUN 27-JUL 01, 2004, Calcutta, INDIA, V346, P139 Torvik Vetle I., 2009, ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA, V3, Ma Nan, 2008, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V44, P800 Greenberg Steven A., 2009, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V339, Chen P., 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P278 Aiello W., 2000, Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of ComputingProceedings of 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 21-23 May 2000, Portland, OR, USA, Kleinberg J., 2000, Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, V32, P163 De Castro R, 1999, MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCER, V21, P51 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 Nakov PI, 2004, Proceedings of the SIGIR'04 Workshop on Search and Discovery in Bioinformatics, Ng A, 2001, Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell., V17, P903 Bilke S, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Calero-Medina Clara, 2008, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V2, P272 Kajikawa Yuya, 2009, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V76, P1115 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Kleinberg JM, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE ACM, V46, P604 WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 Agarwal S, 2010, AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, P11 Small H, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V50, P799 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== Search terms matched: JOURNALS(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341023300002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: OPEN ACCESS *JOURNALS* AND ACADEMICS' BEHAVIOR Authors: Migheli, M; Ramello, GB Author Full Names: Migheli, Matteo; Ramello, Giovanni B. Source: ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 52 (4):1250-1266; 10.1111/ecin.12131 OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: WILLINGNESS; SCHOLARS Abstract: The rising star of scholarly publishing is Open Access (OA). Even some traditional journals now offer this option on author payment, and many full freely accessible journals are now available to scholars, providing relief to research institutions increasingly unable to afford the escalating subscription rates of serials. However, proper recognition of full OA journals by the community remains a major obstacle to overcome if they are to become a viable alternative for scholarly communication. Through a survey, this work investigates economics scholars' attitudes to OA, and attempts to outline the state of practices and norms governing individuals' publication choices. Addresses: [Migheli, Matteo] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Econ & Stat Cognetti de Martiis, I-10153 Turin, Italy. [Migheli, Matteo] Univ Turin, CeRP Collegio Carlo Alberto, I-10153 Turin, Italy. [Ramello, Giovanni B.] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dipartimento Giurisprudenza Sci Polit Econ & Soci, I-15121 Alessandria, Italy. [Ramello, Giovanni B.] Univ Piemonte Orientale, BRICK Collegio Carlo Alberto, I-15121 Alessandria, Italy. E-mail Addresses: matteo.migheli at unito.it; giovanni.ramello at sp.unipmn.it Cited Reference Count: 30 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0095-2583 eISSN: 1465-7295 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AO0SW Unique ID: WOS:000341023300002 Cited References: Cornes R, 1996, The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods, Bergstrom T. C., 2004, Nature Web Focus, Bergstrom TC, 2001, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V15, P183 Park Ji-Hong, 2007, JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, V38, P55 Parks R. P., 2002, Journal of Economics Methodology, V9, P317 Willinsky J., 2006, The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, Hubbard B., 2011, Current Issues in Research Communications: Open Access-the View from the Academy, Wooders M., 2009, Economic Analysis and Policy, V39, P71 Nosek Brian A., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P615 Ramello G. B., 2010, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, V7, P7 CLEMENS ES, 1995, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V101, P433 Liebowitz S. J, 1986, Research in Law and Economics, V8, P181 Panitch J. M., 2005, UNC-Chapel Hill Scholarly Communications Convocation, Ellison Glenn, 2011, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V49, P635 Xia Jingfeng, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P615 Fanelli Daniele, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, [Anonymous], 2012, The Economist, Hodges P. H., 2009, Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, V14, P2 Neill Ushma S., 2008, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, V118, P2368 Davis Philip M., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V99, P208 HAMERMESH DS, 1982, SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, V49, P472 Green D, 1998, RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, V20, P85 Houghton J., 2009, Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the Costs and Benefits, McCabe MJ, 2002, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V92, P259 Stephan P., 2010, Bjork B. C., 2009, Information Research, Armstrong M., 2010, Economic Inquiry, V48, P168 Leahey Erin, 2007, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V72, P533 Laakso Mikael, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Migheli Matteo, 2013, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, V35, P149 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341023300007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: WHICH *JOURNAL* RANKINGS BEST EXPLAIN ACADEMIC SALARIES? EVIDENCE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Authors: Gibson, J; Anderson, DL; Tressler, J Author Full Names: Gibson, John; Anderson, David L.; Tressler, John Source: ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 52 (4):1322-1340; 10.1111/ecin.12107 OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: ECONOMICS DEPARTMENTS; NEGATIVE RETURNS; RELATIVE IMPACTS; MODEL SELECTION; SENIORITY; INSTITUTIONS; INDIVIDUALS; WORLDWIDE; CITATION; MARKET Abstract: The ranking of an academic journal is important to authors, universities, journal publishers, and research funders. Rankings are gaining prominence as countries adopt regular research assessment exercises that especially reward publication in high-impact journals. Yet even within a rankings-oriented discipline like economics there is no agreement on how aggressively lower-ranked journals are down-weighted and in how wide is the universe of journals considered. Moreover, since it is typically less costly for authors to cite superfluous references, whether of their own volition or prompted by editors, than it is to ignore relevant ones, rankings based on citations may be easily manipulated. In contrast, when the merits of publication in one journal or another are debated during hiring, promotion, and salary decisions, the evaluators are choosing over actions with costly consequences. We therefore look to the academic labor market, using data on economists in the University of California system to relate their lifetime publications in 700 different academic journals to salary. We test amongst various sets of journal rankings, and publication discount rates, to see which are most congruent with the returns implied by the academic labor market. Addresses: [Gibson, John; Tressler, John] Univ Waikato, Dept Econ, Waikato Management Sch, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. [Anderson, David L.] Queens Univ, Sch Business, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail Addresses: jkgibson at waikato.ac.nz; dla at queensu.ca; tressler at waikato.ac.nz Cited Reference Count: 43 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0095-2583 eISSN: 1465-7295 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AO0SW Unique ID: WOS:000341023300007 Cited References: LIEBOWITZ SJ, 1984, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V22, P77 Greene WH, 2012, Econometric Analysis, Macri J, 2006, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, V20, P111 Hamermesh Daniel S., 2012, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V50, P1 Bratsberg Bernt, 2010, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V48, P704 LABAND DN, 1994, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V32, P640 OECD, 2010, Workshop Proceedings, RANSOM MR, 1993, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V83, P221 Kalaitzidakis Pantelis, 2011, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, V44, P1525 Bratsberg B, 2003, INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, V56, P306 Moore WJ, 2001, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V39, P663 Coupe T, 2004, KYKLOS, V57, P197 Combes P.-P., 2010, Groupement de Recherche en Economie Quantitative d'Aix Marseille (GREQAM), Document de Travail, no 2010-28, Combes Pierre-Philippe, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1250 Liebowitz Stan J., 2014, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V52, P1267 Wilhite Allen W., 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P542 Coupe Tom, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1309 Gibson J., 2000, New Zealand Economic Papers, V34, P73 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Moore WJ, 1998, JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, V16, P352 Kalaitzidakis Pantelis, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1346 PESARAN MH, 1974, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, V41, P153 Kalaitzidakis P., 2010, Working Paper 9/2010, Engemann Kristie M., 2009, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST LOUIS REVIEW, V91, P127 Hilmer Christiana E., 2012, APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, V34, P489 Sauer R., 1998, Journal of Political Economy, V96, P856 Moore William J., 2007, SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL3rd Annual Southeastern-Health-Economics-Study- Group Conference, NOV, 2005, Charleston, SC, V73, P717 Hilmer CE, 2005, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, V87, P509 Kodrzycki Y., 2006, B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, V5, Ellison Glenn, 2013, AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, V5, P63 Chang Chia-Lin, 2011, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, V25, P326 Amir Rabah, 2008, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V90, P185 Oswald Andrew J., 2007, ECONOMICA, V74, P21 Mason Paul M., 1997, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, V36, P69 VUONG QH, 1989, ECONOMETRICA, V57, P307 Card David, 2013, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V51, P144 Abelson P, 2009, Economic Papers, V28, P176 University of California, 2009, Facts About the University of California, Total Compensation for UC Employees, 1995, Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. National Research Council, Hilmer C., 2012, Discussion Paper No. 6960, HAMERMESH DS, 1982, SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, V49, P472 Hamermesh Daniel S., 2013, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V51, P162 Tressler J., 2012, Agenda, V19, P17 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341023300004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: IDENTIFYING THE EFFECT OF OPEN ACCESS ON *CITATIONS* USING A PANEL OF SCIENCE *JOURNALS* Authors: McCabe, MJ; Snyder, CM Author Full Names: McCabe, Mark J.; Snyder, Christopher M. Source: ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 52 (4):1284-1300; 10.1111/ecin.12064 OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: ACADEMIC JOURNALS; IMPACT; MODEL; HYPOTHESES; TRADE; COSTS; TESTS Abstract: An open-access journal allows free online access to its articles, obtaining revenue from fees charged to submitting authors or from institutional support. Using panel data on science journals, we are able to circumvent problems plaguing previous studies of the impact of open access on citations. In contrast to the huge effects found in these previous studies, we find a more modest effect: moving from paid to open access increases cites by 8% on average in our sample. The benefit is concentrated among top-ranked journals. In fact, open access causes a statistically significant reduction in cites to the bottom-ranked journals in our sample, leading us to conjecture that open access may intensify competition among articles for readers' attention, generating losers as well as winners. Addresses: [McCabe, Mark J.] Boston Univ, Dept Econ, Boston, MA 02215 USA. [McCabe, Mark J.] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA. [McCabe, Mark J.] SKEMA Business Sch, Sophia Antipolis, France. [Snyder, Christopher M.] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Econ, Hanover, NH 03755 USA. [Snyder, Christopher M.] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA. E-mail Addresses: mccabe at umich.edu; chris.snyder at dartmouth.edu Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0095-2583 eISSN: 1465-7295 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AO0SW Unique ID: WOS:000341023300004 Cited References: Murray Fiona, 2007, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATIONConference on Academic Science and Entrepreneurship, APR 01-02, 2005, Santa Fe, NM, V63, P648 FREEMAN C, 1994, CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V18, P463 DOSI G, 1988, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V26, P1120 Simcoe T., 2008, XTPQML: Stata Module to Estimate Fixed-Effects Poisson (Quasi-ML) Regression with Robust Standard Errors, Craig Iain D., 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P239 Elberse A., 2008, Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 07-015, Lewenstein B. V., 2008, British Medical Journal, V337, P568 DAVIDSON R, 1981, ECONOMETRICA, V49, P781 BLALOCK HM, 1966, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V31, P52 Wooldridge JM, 1999, JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, V90, P77 Walker T., 2004, Nature Web Focus, Bergstrom TC, 2001, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V15, P183 McCabe MJ, 2005, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW117th Annual Meeting of the American-Economic-Association, JAN 07, 2005, Philadelphia, PA, V95, P453 Young J. R., 2004, Chronicle of Higher Education, PA36 VUONG QH, 1989, ECONOMETRICA, V57, P307 McCabe Mark J., 2013, JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, V39, P11 Bergstrom CT, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V101, P897 Evans James A., 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P1025 Melitz MJ, 2003, ECONOMETRICA, V71, P1695 Brynjolfsson Erik, 2011, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V57, P1373 Brody T., 2004, D-Lib Magazine, V10, Dewatripont M., 2006, Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe, McCabe Mark J., 2007, B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, V7, Jeon Doh-Shin, 2010, AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, V2, P222 Lawrence S, 2001, NATURE, V411, P521 Chaney Thomas, 2008, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V98, P1707 Gans J. S., 2011, SSRN Working Paper Abstract Number 1559871, Fehder D. C., 2012, Working Paper, Eysenbach Gunther, 2006, PLOS BIOLOGY, V4, P692 [Anonymous], 2012, The Economist, Gaule Patrick, 2011, RESEARCH POLICY, V40, P1332 Davis Philip M., 2011, FASEB JOURNAL, V25, P2129 McCabe M. J., Review of Economics and Statistics, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341186200002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Telemedicine - A *bibliometric* and content analysis of 17,932 publication records Authors: Armfield, NR; Edirippulige, S; Caffery, LJ; Bradford, NK; Grey, JW; Smith, AC Author Full Names: Armfield, Nigel R.; Edirippulige, Sisira; Caffery, Liam J.; Bradford, Natalie K.; Grey, Joanne W.; Smith, Anthony C. Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 83 (10):715-725; 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.001 OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Telemedicine, Telehealth, Bibliometric analysis, Content analysis KeyWords Plus: E-HEALTH; COST; TELEPATHOLOGY; TELECARE; QUALITY; ACCESS; SYSTEM Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to provide an up-to-date contemporary bibliometric view of the Received in revised form telemedicine and telehealth literature and a longitudinal analysis of changes in content 30 June 2014 themes. Accepted 2 July 2014 Methods: Software tools were used to extract and process MEDLINE entries. Frequencies of papers by year of publication and outlet were calculated, ranked, charted and tabulated. Keywords: Frequency of publication by author was also calculated, ranked and tabulated. The process was repeated for two time periods to examine change: (i) 1970-1995 and (ii) 2009-2013. Telehealth Content analysis of abstracts was conducted and tag clouds were generated. This visual Bibliometric analysis representation was used to identify key words and prominent themes. Content analysis Results: 17,932 records relating to articles published in 2523 unique outlets were analyzed. In the cumulative literature, 3152 (18%) articles were published in specialist telemedicine journals while most articles (14,780 [82%]) were published in mainstream outlets. This pattern was observed in both epochs. Clinical journals were not highly represented. Over time 46,066 unique authors have contributed to the field, with 21,109 of them publishing in the period 2009-2013. Discussion: Telemedicine is a large and growing field with most publication occurring outside of the specialist journals. Content analysis suggested a change of focus from the technical to the clinical between the two epochs. As a healthcare setting, the home also appears to be emergent. Conclusion: This study updates the findings of previous studies. The emphasis within the literature suggests a move from technical issues to clinical applications and evaluation. The maturity of the field and its accessibility to clinicians and policy makers remains unclear. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Armfield, Nigel R.; Edirippulige, Sisira; Caffery, Liam J.; Bradford, Natalie K.; Grey, Joanne W.; Smith, Anthony C.] Univ Queensland, Ctr Online Hlth, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. [Armfield, Nigel R.; Bradford, Natalie K.; Smith, Anthony C.] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Queensland Childrens Med Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. E-mail Addresses: N.R.Armfield at uq.edu.au ResearcherID Numbers: Smith, Anthony/E-9538-2010 Cited Reference Count: 61 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, ELSEVIER HOUSE, BROOKVALE PLAZA, EAST PARK SHANNON, CO, CLARE, 00000, IRELAND ISSN: 1386-5056 eISSN: 1872-8243 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics Research Areas: Computer Science; Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics IDS Number: AO2WC Unique ID: WOS:000341186200002 Cited References: Cannavo M, 1994, Administrative radiology : AR, V13, P55 MCLAREN PM, 1992, MEDICAL TEACHER, V14, P43 Rinde Eivind Vvar Nordrum, 1993, World Health Forum, V14, P71 Bashshur R L, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P151 PARK B, 1975, JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, V25, P161 Kayser K., 1995, Archives d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, V43, P216 Nordrum I., 1995, Archives d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, V43, P253 Cannavo M, 1995, Health management technology, V16, P27 Ball C J, 1995, Journal of telemedicine and telecare, V1, P22 Martin Etienne, 1992, Zentralblatt fuer Pathologie, V138, P419 Sanders J H, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P115 Demiris G, 2005, JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, V11, P316 KAYSER K, 1995, ANALYTICAL CELLULAR PATHOLOGY, V9, P53 Kayser K., 1992, Zentralblatt fuer Pathologie, V138, P389 Armfield Nigel R., 2014, MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, V200, P530 Bashshur R L, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P249 Fatehi Farhad, 2012, JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE2nd International Conference on Global Telehealth, NOV 26-28, 2012, Sydney, AUSTRALIA, V18, P460 Kayser K., 1992, Zentralblatt fuer Pathologie, V138, P395 Martin ED, 1995, BULLETIN DU CANCERConference on Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Optimization in Oncology - Contribution of Computers Grenoble, MAR 30-31, 1995, GRENOBLE, FRANCE, V82, PS565 ALLEN A, 1994, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, V84, P1693 PEREDNIA DA, 1995, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V273, P483 Dusserre P, 1995, Medinfo. MEDINFO, V8 Pt 2, P1475 Moser PL, 2004, JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, V10, P72 EIDE TJ, 1994, APMIS, V102, P881 Cannavo M, 1993, Administrative radiology : AR, V12, P54 Della Mea Vincenzo, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY10th European Congress on Telepathology/4th International Congress on Virtual Microscopy, JUL 01-03, 2010, Vilnius, LITHUANIA, V6, Allaert F A, 1995, Proceedings / the ... Annual Symposium on Computer Application [sic] in Medical Care. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, P596 Kayser K, 1992, Zentralblatt f?r Pathologie, V138, P381 Allen A, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P41 BASHSHUR RL, 1995, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS2nd NASA/USUHS International Conference on Telemedicine for Remote Health Care and Disaster Response, SEP 06-10, 1994, BETHESDA, MD, V19, P79 Kayser K., 1995, Archives d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, V43, P196 Allen A, 1995, Journal of telemedicine and telecare, V1, P34 Cannavo M, 1994, Administrative radiology : AR, V13, P32 Cannavo M, 1993, Administrative radiology : AR, V12, P35 Cannavo M., 1994, Admin. Radiol.: AR, V13, P58 Bashshur R L, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P81 Kayser K., 1993, In Vivo (Attiki), V7, P395 Askari Azam, 2014, JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, V20, P35 Cannavo M, 1993, Administrative radiology : AR, V12, P44 Bashshur R L, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P19 Armfield Nigel R., 2014, JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, V20, P164 BASHSHUR R, 1977, AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, V48, P65 Cannavo M J, 1994, Administrative radiology : AR, V13, P38 Mistry Hema, 2012, JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, V18, P1 Franken E A Jr, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P5 Allen A, 1995, Healthcare information management : journal of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society of the American Hospital Association, V9, P13 Martin E., 1995, Archives d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, V43, P191 BASHSHUR RL, 1995, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS2nd NASA/USUHS International Conference on Telemedicine for Remote Health Care and Disaster Response, SEP 06-10, 1994, BETHESDA, MD, V19, P81 Eide Tor J. Vvar Nordrum, 1992, Zentralblatt fuer Pathologie, V138, P405 [Anonymous], 2014, MEDLINE® / PubMed® Data Element (Field) Descriptions, Secondary MEDLINE® / PubMed® Data Element (Field) Descriptions, Eide Tor J., 1992, Zentralblatt fuer Pathologie, V138, P409 HOUTCHENS BA, 1995, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS2nd NASA/USUHS International Conference on Telemedicine for Remote Health Care and Disaster Response, SEP 06-10, 1994, BETHESDA, MD, V19, P93 McLaren P, 1995, Journal of telemedicine and telecare, V1, P79 Allen A, 1992, Kansas medicine : the journal of the Kansas Medical Society, V93, P323 Bashshur R L, 1976, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing, V13, P233 BALL CJ, 1993, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V32, P303 FRANKEN EA, 1992, ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, V670, P277 Whan Peter, 2006, JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE6th International Conference on Successes and Failures in Telehealth (SFT-6), AUG 24-25, 2006, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA, V12, P95 Whitten P S, 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, V1, P203 Franken E A Jr, 1995, Journal of telemedicine and telecare, V1, P202 MCLAREN P, 1995, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V310, P1390 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341086600042 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Dynamic Science - A *Bibliometric* Review of microRNAs in Literature Authors: Casey, MC; Miller, N; Brown, JAL; Kerin, MJ; Sweeney, KJ Author Full Names: Casey, M. C.; Miller, N.; Brown, J. A. L.; Kerin, M. J.; Sweeney, K. J. Source: IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 183 S236-S236; 5 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Meeting Abstract Addresses: [Casey, M. C.; Miller, N.; Brown, J. A. L.; Kerin, M. J.; Sweeney, K. J.] NUI Galway, Sch Med, Discipline Surg, Galway, Ireland. Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER LONDON LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, 6TH FLOOR, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND ISSN: 0021-1265 eISSN: 1863-4362 Web of Science Categories: Medicine, General & Internal Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine IDS Number: AO1PX Unique ID: WOS:000341086600042 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341219700002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Assessing the impact of JIBS as an interdisciplinary *journal*: A network approach Authors: Cantwell, J; Piepenbrink, A; Shukla, P Author Full Names: Cantwell, John; Piepenbrink, Anke; Shukla, Pallavi Source: JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 45 (7):787-799; 10.1057/jibs.2014.40 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Author Keywords: interdisciplinarity, citation analysis, international business, intermediation, integration KeyWords Plus: BETWEENNESS CENTRALITY; INTERNATIONAL-BUSINESS; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE Abstract: In this editorial, we assess the cross-disciplinary connections of JIBS by examining its citation network, which spreads across no less than 36 disciplines or fields. Using a citation network of 166 citing and 645 cited journals, we investigate JIBS' interdisciplinarity using the intermediation and integration approaches of network analysis. Our analyses of citation patterns for a 12-year time period (2001-2012) suggests that JIBS is helping bridge disciplines that do not often otherwise talk to each other a task of critical importance for new knowledge creation. We also find that JIBS is enabling integration of knowledge from a diverse set of disciplines in comparison to other prominent leading management journals. Addresses: [Cantwell, John; Shukla, Pallavi] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Management & Global Business, Newark, NJ 07102 USA. [Piepenbrink, Anke] ADA Univ, Baku, Azerbaijan. E-mail Addresses: cantwell at jibs.net Cited Reference Count: 23 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD, BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND ISSN: 0047-2506 eISSN: 1478-6990 Web of Science Categories: Business; Management Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AO3HG Unique ID: WOS:000341219700002 Cited References: Morillo F, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P1237 Leydesdorff Loet, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V58, P1303 Rafols Ismael, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P263 Sullivan Daniel, 2011, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, V42, P446 van Rijnsoever Frank J., 2011, RESEARCH POLICY, V40, P463 Rinia EJ, 2001, RESEARCH POLICY, V30, P357 Langfeldt Liv, 2006, RESEARCH EVALUATION14th Nordic-Political-Science-Assoiation Conference, AUG, 2005, Reykjavik, ICELAND, V15, P31 Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P348 Piepenbrink Anke, 2013, ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, V16, P474 Cheng Joseph L. C., 2009, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, V40, P1070 Rafols Ismael, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P1262 National Academies, 2004, Facilitating interdisciplinary research, R Core DevelopmentTeam, 2014, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, DUNNING JH, 1989, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, V20, P411 Leahey Erin, 2007, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V72, P533 Eden Lorraine, 2008, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, V39, P1 Laudel Grit, 2006, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V15, P2 Porter Alan L., 2006, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V15, P187 Csardi G., 2006, Int. J.: Complex Syst., V1695, P1695 Porter Alan L., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P719 FREEMAN LC, 1977, SOCIOMETRY, V40, P35 Brandes U, 2001, JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, V25, P163 Cantwell John, 2011, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, V42, P1 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341088000005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Contemporary intellectual structure of CSCL research (2006-2013): a *co-citation* network analysis with an education focus Authors: Tang, KY; Tsai, CC; Lin, TC Author Full Names: Tang, Kai-Yu; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Lin, Tzu-Chiang Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 9 (3):335-363; 10.1007/s11412-014-9196-5 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL), Document co-citation analysis (DCA), Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Social network analysis (SNA), Literature review KeyWords Plus: SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ARGUMENTATION; KNOWLEDGE-CONSTRUCTION; AUTHOR COCITATION; MACRO-SCRIPTS; REPRESENTATIONAL GUIDANCE; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; ROLE ASSIGNMENT; FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; DIAGRAMS Abstract: This present study endeavors to discover the scholarly communication structure in the CSCL knowledge domain. To explore the intellectual structure of contemporary literature of CSCL research from 2006 to 2013, over a thousand research papers indexed in the leading journal publications and conference proceedings were retrieved from WOS. Accordingly, this paper adopted a series of methods to analyze these research articles from macro to micro level, including document co-citation analysis (DCA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and social network analysis (SNA). As a result, a total of 7,552 and 2,180 co-citation ties were obtained from 403 to 66 source papers, respectively. In addition, six intellectual subfields within the CSCL literature were extracted, namely: (1) representation, discourse & pattern, (2) factors influencing CSCL, (3) intervention and comparison, (4) critical reasoning, (5) process of social construction, and (6) design and modeling of CSCL. Central documents and publications within contemporary CSCL research were identified and presented in the undirected co-citation networks from both macro and micro perspectives. Furthermore, the dissemination of underlying subfields and pivotal documents serving as a boundary-spanning role were discussed. This is the very first attempt to integrate the bibliographical method, statistical analysis, and visualization techniques in relation to contemporary CSCL research. Further discussion and research directions for future CSCL study are provided. Addresses: [Tang, Kai-Yu; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Lin, Tzu-Chiang] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Digital Learning & Educ, Taipei 10607, Taiwan. E-mail Addresses: ky.nctu at gmail.com; cctsai at mail.ntust.edu.tw; angelo at mail.ntust.edu.tw Cited Reference Count: 112 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA ISSN: 1556-1607 eISSN: 1556-1615 Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Education & Educational Research; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AO1QK Unique ID: WOS:000341088000005 Cited References: Onrubia Javier, 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V7, P161 Meier Anne, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P63 van Aalst Jan, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009), JUN 08-13, 2009, Rhodes, GREECE, V4, P259 Di Stefano Giada, 2010, INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, V19, P1187 Chen Liang-Chu, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P867 Schwarz Baruch B., 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P297 de Laat Maarten, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P87 Carolan B. V., 2005, Educational Researcher, V34, P25 Nerur Sridhar P., 2008, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V29, P319 Lee Min-Hsien, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, V31, P1999 Jones Chris, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P35 Otte E, 2002, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V28, P441 Schellens T, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P349 Baker Michael, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P315 Baghaei Nilufar, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P159 Suthers Daniel D., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V5, P5 De Wever Bram, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P436 De Smet Marijke, 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V50, P207 Stahl Gerry, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P365 Kollar Ingo, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P708 Rose Carolyn, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P237 Acedo FJ, 2006, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V43, P957 Ramos-Rodriguez AR, 2004, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V25, P981 FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V1, P215 Lonchamp Jacques, 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V7, P475 Stegmann Karsten, 2012, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V40, P297 Reimann Peter, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009), JUN 08-13, 2009, Rhodes, GREECE, V4, P239 Borgman CL, 2002, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V36, P3 MCCAIN KW, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P433 Weinberger A, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P71 Erkens Gijsbert, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009), JUN 08-13, 2009, Rhodes, GREECE, V3, P447 Cakir Murat Perit, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P115 Lonchamp Jacques, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P247 Dillenbourg Pierre, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P5 Naidu S, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P96 Dillenbourg P., 2007, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, V23, P1 De Wever B., 2009, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, V25, P177 Stahl Gerry, 2006, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, P409 Asterhan Christa S. C., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V5, P259 Kobbe Lars, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P211 Lund Kristine, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P273 Ertl Bernhard, 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V51, P1599 Ding N., 2009, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V52, P509 Weinberger Armin, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P416 Arnseth Hans Christian, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P167 Tuire P., 2001, Higher Education, V42, P493 Wellman B., 1988, Social structures: A network approach, V2, Everton S. F., 2004, A guide for the visually perplexed: Visually representing social networks, Tchounikine Pierre, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P193 Mirza Nathalie Muller, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P247 Jermann Patrick, 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V51, P279 Schwarz Baruch B., 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P449 Schrire S, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P49 Tight Malcolm, 2008, HIGHER EDUCATION, V55, P593 Sharan Yael, 2010, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, V45, P300 De Laat Maarten, 2007, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V35, P257 Kienle Andrea, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P9 Isotani Seiji, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P445 Rourke Liam, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P105 Jeong Allan C., 2006, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V34, P367 KAMADA T, 1989, INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, V31, P7 van der Pol J., 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P339 Jeong Allan, 2007, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V48, P427 Janssen Jeroen, 2010, INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, V38, P59 Kapur Manu, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V4, P21 Desmedt E., 2004, Educational Psychology, V24, P445 Schellens Tammy, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P225 Pilkington Alan, 2009, JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, V27, P185 White HD, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P423 Arvaja Maarit, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P133 De Wever Bram, 2010, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V20, P349 Cress Ulrike, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P69 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 van Aalst Jan, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCESInternational Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, JUN, 2003, Bergen, NORWAY, V16, P175 Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P348 Suthers Daniel D., 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V1, P315 Scott J, 1991, Suthers Daniel D., 2008, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V50, P1103 Scheuer Oliver, 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V5, P43 Cress Ulrike, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V3, P105 Long Yuan, 2013, INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, V113, P605 White HD, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P327 De Wever B, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P6 Hsiao Chun Hua, 2011, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, V31, P128 Jonassen David H., 2010, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V58, P439 Prinsen F. R., 2009, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V52, P113 Van Arnelsvoort Marije, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, V16, P485 Strijbos Jan-Willem, 2007, LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, V17, P389 Janssen Jeroen, 2007, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V49, P1037 Lin Tzu-Chiang, 2014, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, V36, P1346 Wessner M., 2007, Proceedings of the CSCL 2007: Mice, minds, and society, Tsai CC, 2005, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, V27, P3 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 SMALL H, 1974, SCIENCE STUDIES, V4, P17 FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, V21, P1129 Kirschner Paul A., 2013, EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, V48, P1 Acedo Francisco Jose, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V27, P621 Noroozi Omid, 2012, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V60, P193 Weigel F. K., 2013, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, V33, P15 Hernandez-Leo D, 2006, EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, V9, P58 Strijbos JW, 2006, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V46, P29 Wasserman Stanley, 1994, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Borgatti SP, 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis, KAISER HF, 1974, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V39, P31 WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 Hamalainen Raija, 2010, TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, V26, P871 Peteraf Margaret, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V34, P1389 Stegmann Karsten, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, V2, P421 Stahl G., 2002, Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Uysal Oezguer Oezmen, 2010, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, V93, P137 Hoadley C. M., 2005, Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: Learning 2005: the next 10 years!, P205 Kienle Andrea, 2005, CSCL 2005: COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING 2005: THE NEXT 10 YEARS, PROCEEDINGSInternational Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, MAY 30-JUN 04, 2005, Taipei, TAIWAN, P262 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341242800001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Gender and *Citations* in American Anthropologist Authors: Chibnik, M Author Full Names: Chibnik, Michael Source: AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 116 (3):493-496; 10.1111/aman.12117 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Addresses: Univ Iowa, Dept Anthropol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA. E-mail Addresses: amanthro at uiowa.edu Cited Reference Count: 7 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0002-7294 eISSN: 1548-1433 Web of Science Categories: Anthropology Research Areas: Anthropology IDS Number: AO3OU Unique ID: WOS:000341242800001 Cited References: Low SM, 2001, AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, V103, P45 LUTZ C, 1990, AMERICAN ETHNOLOGIST, V17, P611 Chibnik Michael, 2014, AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, V116, P1 Abu-Lughod L, 2002, AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, V104, P783 Merry SE, 2006, AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, V108, P38 Dominguez Virginia R., 2014, Anthropology News, V55, P29 Sugimoto Cassidy R., 2013, NATURE, V504, P211 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341036300001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Substance use disorders in Arab countries: research activity and *bibliometric* analysis Authors: Sweileh, WM; Zyoud, SH; Al-Jabi, SW; Sawalha, AF Author Full Names: Sweileh, Waleed M.; Zyoud, Sa'ed H.; Al-Jabi, Samah W.; Sawalha, Ansam F. Source: SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 9 10.1186/1747-597X-9-33 AUG 23 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric, Substance use disorders, Arab countries, ISI web of science KeyWords Plus: MENTAL-HEALTH; HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; WORLD; SCIENCE; SCOPUS; WEB; SERVICES; DISEASES; ALCOHOL Abstract: Background: Substance use disorders, which include substance abuse and substance dependence, are present in all regions of the world including Middle Eastern Arab countries. Bibliometric analysis is an increasingly used tool for research assessment. The main objective of this study was to assess research productivity in the field of substance use disorders in Arab countries using bibliometric indicators. Methodology: Original or review research articles authored or co-authored by investigators from Arab countries about substance use disorders during the period 1900-2013 were retrieved using the ISI Web of Science database. Research activity was assessed by analyzing the annual research productivity, contribution of each Arab country, names of journals, citations, and types of abused substances. Results: Four hundred and thirteen documents in substance use disorders were retrieved. Annual research productivity was low but showed a significant increase in the last few years. In terms of quantity, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (83 documents) ranked first in research about substance use disorders while Lebanon (17.4 documents per million) ranked first in terms of number of documents published per million inhabitants. Retrieved documents were found in different journal titles and categories, mostly in Drug and Alcohol Dependence Journal. Authors from USA appeared in 117 documents published by investigators from Arab countries. Citation analysis of retrieved documents showed that the average citation per document was 10.76 and the h - index was 35. The majority of retrieved documents were about tobacco and smoking (175 documents) field while alcohol consumption and abuse research was the least with 69 documents. Conclusion: The results obtained suggest that research in this field was largely neglected in the past. However, recent research interest was observed. Research output on tobacco and smoking was relatively high compared to other substances of abuse like illicit drugs and medicinal agents. Governmental funding for academics and mental health graduate programs to do research in the field of substance use disorders is highly recommended. Addresses: [Sweileh, Waleed M.; Sawalha, Ansam F.] An Najah Natl Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Nablus, Israel. [Zyoud, Sa'ed H.; Al-Jabi, Samah W.] An Najah Natl Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Clin & Community Pharm, Nablus, Israel. E-mail Addresses: waleedsweileh at yahoo.com Cited Reference Count: 42 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND ISSN: 1747-597X Article Number: 33 Web of Science Categories: Substance Abuse Research Areas: Substance Abuse IDS Number: AO0XN Unique ID: WOS:000341036300001 Cited References: Wikipedia, 2012, Arab World, Jaalouk Doris, 2012, SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, V47, P1727 Rahim Hanan F. Abdul, 2014, LANCET, V383, P356 WHO, 2003, Questionnaire for Regional Situation Analysis on Drug Abuse 2003, WHO, 2010, World Health Organization. ATLAS on substance use (2010): resources for the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders., Rashid S, 2012, Mental Health Religion Culture, V15, P653 De Battisti Francesca, 2013, STATISTICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, V22, P269 Bassiony Medhat, 2013, JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, V18, P450 Kronfol N. M., 2012, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, V18, P1151 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Falagas Matthew E., 2008, FASEB JOURNAL, V22, P338 Zyoud Sa'ed H., 2014, HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, V11, Whiteford Harvey A., 2013, LANCET, V382, P1575 Said AM, 2012, Addict Disord Treat, V11, P36 Okasha Ahmed, 2012, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V11, P52 Karam EG, 2004, DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, V76, P273 Odenwald M, 2007, SUCHT-Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaft und Praxis/J Addict Res Pract, V53, P9 Association AP, 2013, The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM 5: bookpointUS, Okasha A, 1999, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, V19, P917 Cheikh Imen Ben, 2011, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, V198, P494 Odenwald Michael, 2005, BMC MEDICINE, V3, UNODC, 2010, World Drug Report, Tadmouri GO, 2004, SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, V25, P7 Ignacio de Granda-Orive Jose, 2011, ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, V47, P213 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Fawzui MM, 2011, Egypt J Forensic Sci, V1, P99 Bramness Jorgen G., 2014, EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, V20, P16 Hofman Karen, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V94, P415 Hankir A, 2013, Psychiatr Danub, V25, P345 Salamoun MM, 2008, Arab J Psychiatry, V19, P100 Wallin JA, 2005, BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, V97, P261 Rashidi A., 2013, IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, V8, P313 AlMarri Tayyiba S. K., 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, V44, P222 Mokdad Ali H., 2014, LANCET, V383, P309 Kronfol N. M., 2012, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, V18, P1157 Al Gaferi H, 2013, Int J Prev Treat Subst Use Disord, V1, P7 Kronfol N. M., 2012, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, V18, P1229 Elkoussi Alaaeldin, 2011, SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, V46, P35 Kulkarni Abhaya V., 2009, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V302, P1092 Huber Jeffrey T., 2003, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, V22, P23 Sweileh Waleed M, 2014, BMC research notes, V7, P258 Sweileh WM, 2014, Scientometrics, V1, P14 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341062300001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Of Predatory Publishers and Spurious *Impact Factors* Authors: Sohail, S Author Full Names: Sohail, Saba Source: JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 24 (8):537-538; AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Addresses: DHA, Karachi, Pakistan. E-mail Addresses: drsabasohail at hotmail.com Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: COLL PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS PAKISTAN, SEVENTH CENTRAL ST, DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, KARACHI, 75500, PAKISTAN ISSN: 1022-386X eISSN: 1681-7168 Web of Science Categories: Medicine, General & Internal Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine IDS Number: AO1HD Unique ID: WOS:000341062300001 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341248000003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of *citation* publishing in an open access *journal* (CytoJournal) compared to traditional cytopathology *journals* - A five year (2007-2011) experience Authors: Frisch, NK; Nathan, R; Ahmed, YK; Shidham, VB Author Full Names: Frisch, Nora K.; Nathan, Romil; Ahmed, Yasin K.; Shidham, Vinod B. Source: CYTOJOURNAL, 11 10.4103/1742-6413.131739 APR 29 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citations, impact, open access, publication KeyWords Plus: FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS-CELLS; A-CASE-REPORT; HIGH-RISK HPV; INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; CERVICOVAGINAL MELANOMA THINPREP; CONVENTIONAL PAPANICOLAOU TESTS; NON-GYNECOLOGIC CYTOPATHOLOGY; CYTO-HISTOLOGICAL CORRELATION Abstract: Background: The era of Open Access (OA) publication, a platform which serves to better disseminate scientific knowledge, is upon us, as more OA journals are in existence than ever before. The idea that peer-reviewed OA publication leads to higher rates of citation has been put forth and shown to be true in several publications. This is a significant benefit to authors and is in addition to another relatively less obvious but highly critical component of the OA charter, i.e. retention of the copyright by the authors in the public domain. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional non-OA publications specifically for authors in the field of cytopathology. Design: We compared the citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Citations in an OA publication (CytoJournal) were analyzed comparatively with traditional non-OA cytopathology journals (Acta Cytologica, Cancer Cytopathology, Cytopathology, and Diagnostic Cytopathology) using the data from web of science citation analysis site (based on which the impact factors (IF) are calculated). After comparing citations per publication, as well as a time adjusted citation quotient (which takes into account the time since publication), we also analyzed the statistics after excluding the data for meeting abstracts. Results: Total 28 authors published 314 publications as articles and meeting abstracts (25 authors after excluding the abstracts). The rate of citation and time adjusted citation quotient were higher for OA in the group where abstracts were included (P < 0.05 for both). The rates were also slightly higher for OA than non-OA when the meeting abstracts were excluded, but the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.57 and P = 0.45). Conclusion : We observed that for the same author, the publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of citation than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology over a 5 year period (2007-2011). However, this increase was statistically insignificant if the meeting abstracts were excluded from the analysis. Overall, the rates of citation for OA and non-OA were slightly higher to comparable. Addresses: [Frisch, Nora K.] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Karmanos Canc Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA. Old Hutzel Hosp, Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA. E-mail Addresses: nfrisch at med.wayne.edu; romilnathan at gmail.com; yahme at med.wayne.edu; vshidham at med.wayne.edu Cited Reference Count: 323 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD, B-9, KANARA BUSINESS CENTRE, OFF LINK RD, GHAKTOPAR-E, MUMBAI, 400075, INDIA ISSN: 0974-5963 eISSN: 1742-6413 Article Number: 10 Web of Science Categories: Pathology Research Areas: Pathology IDS Number: AO3QG Unique ID: WOS:000341248000003 Cited References: Okonda Sylvain, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Monaco Sara E., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Iyer V., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P410 Hitchcock Thomas, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P376 Singh S., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P260 Crowe Amanda, 2011, CytoJournal, V8, P2 Bean Sarah M., 2011, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V119, P37 Gupta Nalini, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P920 Hoda Rana S., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P621 Ahuja A., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P276 Mathur S. R., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P471 Thrall Michael, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY54th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American-Society-of-Cytopathology, NOV 03-08, 2006, Toronto, CANADA, V111, P217 Arora Raman, 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P907 Gilbert Christopher M., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P398 AJIT D, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOL S, V114, P446 Gupta Prabodh K., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Khalbuss Walid E., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P431 Davis-Devine S, 2008, Cytojournal, V6, P4 Taniyama Kiyomi, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P489 Park Jason Y., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P806 Brimo Fadi, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P224 Thrall Michael J., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Panetti Christine, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P397 Zhao Chengquan, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P366 Shidham Vinod B., 2012, CYTOJOURNAL, V9, Khayyata Said, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P178 Shah Sejal S., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Nayak A., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P50 Arora Vinod K., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P509 Jin Bo, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P483 Henninger Brooke, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P373 Yakoushina Tatiana V., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P738 Baloch Zubair W., 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGYNational-Cancer-Institute Conference on Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science, OCT 22-23, 2007, Bethesda, MD, V36, P425 Mathur Sandeep R., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P63 Thrall Michael J., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Henninger Brooke, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P357 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P75 Jhala Darshana, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P416 Arabi Haitham, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P715 Gargouri Yassine, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Gupta Ruchika, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P531 Kamat S., 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P372 Chivukula Mamatha, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P333 Gupta Ruchika, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Hoda R. S., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P369 Goulart Robert A., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P428 Mead Kristen, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P351 Kocjan G., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P86 Smith GD, 2010, CytoJournal, V7, P3 Shidham Vinod B, 2006, CytoJournal, V3, P5 Wagner David G., 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P730 Hoda Rana, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P337 Layfield Lester J., 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P273 Monaco Sara E., 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P657 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Beraki E., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P414 Leiman G., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P386 Auger M., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P371 Deschenes Majorie, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P904 Gopal Krishan, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P234 Jin Bo, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P925 Saleh Husain A., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P324 Kumar Rajiv, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P868 Pantanowitz Liron, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P65 Rekhi Bharat, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Uke M., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P56 Kapali Malathy, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P26 Rekhi Bharat, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P546 Kastenbaum Hannah A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P403 Pantanowitz Liron, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P181 Michelow P., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P86 Anshu, 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P147 Steele Lucinda A., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P358 Gupta R., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P592 Rekhi B., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P343 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P306 Ponce-Camacho Marco A., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Al-Abbadi Mousa A., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Teman Carolin J., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P379 Gupta Shilpa, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P94 Kushner Yael B., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P447 Ebeltoft K., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P442 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P135 Thrall Michael J., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P407 Kurtz MJ, 2005, Inf Process Manage, V41, Pinco Jeffrey, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P430 Orellana Maria E., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P59 Domfeh Akosua B., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P364 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Kanbour-Shakir Amal, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P345 Zhao Chengquan, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P383 Halloush R. A., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P44 Deschenes Majorie, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P149 Barboza-Quintana Oralia, 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P424 Layfield L. J., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P75 Brimo Fadi, 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P721 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P424 Assaad Margaret, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P397 Baloch Zubair W., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Michelow Pam, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P218 Firnhaber Cynthia, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P10 Brimo Fadi, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P836 Razack R., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P407 Palmieri Beniamino, 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P691 Pantanowitz Liron, 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Shidham Vinod B., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Jian Bo, 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Leung Allen H., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P408 Meara R. S., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P192 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P263 Yakoushina Tatiana V., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P392 Smith Debora, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P342 Kandil D., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P331 Bandyopadhyay Sudeshna, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P379 Smith G. Denice, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P409 Loukeris Kristina, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P37 Bongiovanni Massimo, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P185 Yang Huaitao, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P321 Johnykutty Sharlin, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P763 Austin R. Marshall, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P65 Alkuwari E., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P284 Mathur Sandeep R., 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P740 Laucirica Rodolfo, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P359 Austin R. Marshall, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Renshaw Andrew A., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P180 Smith G. Denice, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P56 Steciuk M., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P130 Thrall Michael J., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY55th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American-Society-of-Cytopathology, NOV 02-06, 2007, Houston, TX, V114, P171 Zhao Chengquan, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P369 Alsharif Mariam, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P408 Young Nancy A., 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P277 Gupta Ruchika, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P504 Kalra Sonali, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P193 Khurana A., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P380 Goulart Robert A., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P364 Sauer Torill, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Saleh Husain A., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, O'Connor S. M., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P375 Alkuwari E, 2008, Cancer, V114, P89 David Doina, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P81 Iyer V., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P415 Gupta R., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P66 Karimzadeh M., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P279 Khalbuss Walid E., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P670 Zhao Chengquan, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P292 Khayyata Said, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P441 Saleh Husain A., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P437 Walsh Beth, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P381 Kastenbaum Hannah A., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Setia Namrata, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Avant C. C., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P503 Chitragar Sanjeev, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Austin R. Marshal, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P386 Arora Raman, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Saleh Husain A., 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P323 Taniyama Kiyomi, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P388 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P364 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P963 Yildiz-Aktas Isil Z., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Monaco Sara E., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P388 Purgina Bibianna, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Henry C. Amber, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P430 Freund Gregory G., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P370 Wagner David G., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P633 Iyer V., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P416 Bakdounes Khdoun, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P503 Barboza-Quintana Oralia, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P819 VanDyke Jessica, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P391 Fischer Andrew, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P307 Bofin Anna M., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P210 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P405 Sharma Sonal, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P1078 Michelow P., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P330 Austin R. Marshall, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Heider Amer, 2011, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V55, P48 Nayak Anupma, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P563 Naqvi Asghar H., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Thrall Michael J., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P354 Austin R. Marshall, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P783 Austin R. Marshall, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P387 Craig Iain D., 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P239 Saleh Husain A., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P406 [Anonymous], 2013, Minitab (Version 16), Brimo Fadi, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P311 Khalbuss Walid E., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Srinivasan Radhika, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P128 Jhala Nirag, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P249 Dubb Michelle, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA46th Congress of the Federation-of-South-African-Societies-of-Pathology, JUL 02-05, 2006, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V53, P179 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P283 Sharma M., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P180 Gupta R., 2009, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V20, P130 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P402 Hanson Joshua, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P377 Schwartz Mary, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P317 Dubb Michelle, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P683 Saleh Husain A., 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P184 Sigamani E., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P398 Hollowell Monica L., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P607 Saleh Husain A., 2008, CYTOJOURNAL, V5, Arava S., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P342 Gomez-Macias G. S., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Gao Faye F., 2011, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V55, P302 Dubb Michelle, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P679 Shi Yuquan, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Blunier Travis E., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P380 Eilers Stan, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P347 Michelow Pam, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Setia Namrata, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P391 Gupta Shilpa, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P843 D'Amore Krista L., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P385 Shidham Vinod B., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P390 Auger Marion, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P414 Rong Rong, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P381 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P383 Michelow P., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P497 Rekhi Bharat, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P136 Pantanowitz Liron, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P236 Moriarty Ann T., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P350 Gupta Ruchika, 2008, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V52, P201 Modem Rukmini R., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P584 Roy Paromita, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P794 Sauer T., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P309 Saleh Husain A., 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P313 Smith G. Denice, 2011, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V55, P576 Rekhi Bharat, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P435 Khalbuss Walid E., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P586 Gupta Ruchika, 2010, CytoJournal, V6, P25 Saleh Husain A., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P439 Kaplan Jennifer S., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P459 Gao Faye F., 2011, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V119, P377 Agarwal S., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P65 Neethling G., 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P398 Shidham Vinod B., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Baloch Zubair W., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P370 Warner Julieann N., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P398 Russell Donna K., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P398 Austin R. Marshall, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P345 Neumann Thomas, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P473 Knight Carrie S., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P359 Wang Yinong, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P272 Pantanowitz Liron, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P159 Gilbert Christopher M, 2011, CytoJournal, V8, P7 Flanangan Melina B., 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P387 Pantanowitz Liron, 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Khalbuss Walid E., 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P24 Agarwal S., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P133 Baloch ZW, 2008, Cytojournal, V5, Auger M., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P274 Gupta Sampada, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P517 Harnad S, 2004, D-Lib Mag, V10, Deng Fang-Ming, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P435 Pantanowitz Liron, 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P249 Zhao Chengquan, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P242 Setia Namrata, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Gupta C., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P414 Gupta Nalini, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P203 Snowden Cindi, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P409 Assaad Margaret W., 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P705 Filomena Carol, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P306 Apewokin S., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P345 Monaco Sara E., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P338 Sauer T., 2008, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V19, P287 Gupta Ruchika, 2009, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V37, P377 Eltoum I. A., 2007, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V18, P143 Modem Rukmini, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V111, P399 Kandil Dina, 2007, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY96th Annual Meeting of the United-States-and-Canadian-Academy-of-Pathology, MAR 24-30, 2007, San Diego, CA, V111, P316 Austin R. Marshall, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P749 Khalbuss Walid, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P380 Lawrence S, 2001, NATURE, V411, P521 Ruben Irene, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P217 Ducatman Barbara S., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P352 Kuperman Michael B., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P361 Michelow Pam, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P395 Smith G. Denice, 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P367 Kanbour-Shakir Amal, 2010, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V118, P315 Das Prasenjit, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P1089 Saleh Husain, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V53, P130 Arya Payam, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Rekhi Bharat, 2011, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V39, P827 Harzing AW., 2007, Publish or perish, Renshaw Andrew A., 2009, CYTOJOURNAL, V6, Faquin William C., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P731 Wagner David G., 2009, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V117, P396 Sauer Torill, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Smith G. Denice, 2010, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P902 Beraki Elsa, 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Zhao Chengquan, 2009, ACTA CYTOLOGICA96th Annual Meeting of the United-States-and-Canadian-Academy-of-Pathology, MAR 24-30, 2007, San Diego, CA, V53, P153 Auger Manon, 2011, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V119, P357 Das P., 2010, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V21, P251 Lang Tee U., 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Gupta Ruchika, 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P884 Yakoushina Tatiana V., 2010, CYTOJOURNAL, V7, Khalbuss Walid E., 2007, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V51, P834 Smith G. Denice, 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P361 Collins Brian T., 2008, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, V114, P440 Agarwal S., 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V22, P318 Layfield Lester J., 2008, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V36, P238 Deveci M. Salih, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P579 Griffin Adrienne Carruth, 2011, CYTOJOURNAL, V8, Dubb Michelle, 2010, ACTA CYTOLOGICA, V54, P183 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341233600002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A probe into the *citation* patterns of high-quality and high-impact publications Authors: Li, J; Ye, FY Author Full Names: Li, Jiang; Ye, Fred Y. Source: MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, 19 (2):17-33; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citation analysis, Citation pattern, Citation curve, Sleeping-beauty, Obsolescence KeyWords Plus: SLEEPING BEAUTIES; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; OBSOLESCENCE; SCIENCE; AGE; DOCUMENTATION; PREMATURITY; GENETICS; MODEL Abstract: Enlightened by Avramescu's studies, we classified the citation patterns of high-quality and high-impact publications ito five mathematical types: lognormal-type, exponential-type, polynomial-type, wave-type and sleeping-beauty. Based on practical datasets of high-quality and high-impact publications, the five types of citation patterns are fitted well at statistical level. The results reveal that high-quality publications usually appear irregular citation curves (wave-type and sleeping-beauty) and high-impact publications tend to show regular ones (lognormal-type, exponential-type and polynomial-type). Addresses: [Li, Jiang] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Informat Resource Management, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. [Ye, Fred Y.] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: yye at nju.edu.cn Cited Reference Count: 35 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: UNIV MALAYA, FAC COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECH, UNIV MALAYA, FAC COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECH, KUALA LUMPUR, 50603, MALAYSIA ISSN: 1394-6234 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AO3MH Unique ID: WOS:000341233600002 Cited References: Barher B., 1961, Science, V134, P596 Amin M., 2000, Perspectives in Publishing, V1, P1 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 van Raan AFJ, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P467 Burrell QL, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P381 EGGHE L, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICS, V27, P195 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, WYATT HV, 1975, PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, V18, P149 Bouabid Hamid, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P199 Mingers John, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1451 GARFIELD E, 1989, CURRENT CONTENTS, V38, P3 LINE MB, 1974, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V30, P283 Sangam SL, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS, V44, P33 Glanzel W, 2004, SCIENTIST, V18, P8 Glanzel W, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics, AUG, 2003, Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA, V60, P511 Egghe Leo, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1637 Burrell QL, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V53, P309 Pollmann T, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P43 Braun Tibor, 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P195 Garwin L., 2003, A century of 'Nature': Twenty-One discoveries that changed science and the world, GUPTA U, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P282 Rao I. K. R., 1991, Third International Conference on Informetrics, Aug. 9-12, Bangalore India, STENT GS, 1972, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, V227, P84 GRIFFITH BC, 1979, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V35, P179 Li Jiang, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P795 Cunningham S. J., 1995, Working paper 95/16, Gupta BM, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICS, V40, P139 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 EGGHE L, 1992, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V28, P201 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: its theory and applications in science, technology, and humanities, Nakamoto H., 1988, Informetrics87/88, P157 AVRAMESCU A, 1979, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V30, P296 COLE S, 1970, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V76, P286 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341015900001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Quantitative Aspects of *Journal* of Quantitative Linguistics Authors: Chen, RN; Liu, HT Author Full Names: Chen, Ruina; Liu, Haitao Source: JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, 21 (4):299-340; 10.1080/09296174.2014.944327 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCY NETWORKS; AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION; PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTION; CHINESE WORD; VERB VALENCY; LANGUAGE; CLASSIFICATION; FREQUENCIES; CHARACTERS; ASTERISK Abstract: As one of the most authoritative journals in the field of quantitative linguistics, the Journal of Quantitative Linguistics has just passed its 20th birthday. In this paper, we collect information from the 20 volumes of this journal published so far (1994-2013) to build a corpus, then extract different categories of information using corpus tools. By quantitative analysis of the corpus data, complemented with information extracted from abstract and citation index databases such as Scopus and Web of Knowledge as important references, we aim to explore the objects, aims and methodologies of quantitative linguistics, its focuses and shifts in different periods, representative achievements in the past 20 years, and possible directions for the future. During the process, the role of JQL both in the development of quantitative linguistics and the wider scientific community are located and evaluated with quantitative-based evidence. The findings are that JQL contributes greatly to the development of quantitative linguistics and is in many aspects representative of changes in this field, keeping close pace with trends in the discipline and the ever-evolving characteristics of quantitative linguistics over the years. Addresses: [Chen, Ruina; Liu, Haitao] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Linguist, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. [Chen, Ruina] Guizhou Univ, Dept Foreign Languages, Guiyang 550003, Peoples R China. [Liu, Haitao] Zhejiang Univ, Ningbo Inst Technol, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: lhtzju at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 86 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 0929-6174 eISSN: 1744-5035 Web of Science Categories: Linguistics; Language & Linguistics Research Areas: Linguistics IDS Number: AO0QL Unique ID: WOS:000341015900001 Cited References: Grabchak M., 2013, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V20, P301 Altmann G., 2013, Issues in Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P23 Liu Haitao, 2010, LINGUA3rd Workshop on Contrast - Contrast Towards a Closer Definition, MAY, 2007, Berlin, GERMANY, V120, P1567 Yue Ming, 2011, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V18, P107 Breiter M. A., 1994, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V1, P224 Takakura S., 2005, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V12, P239 Popescu I.-I., 2011, The Lambda-structure of text, Rottger W., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P68 Popescu I.-I., 2009, Aspects of Word Frequencies, Eger Steffen, 2013, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V20, P252 Hu F., 2008, EPL (Europhysics Letters), V83, Altmann G., 2000, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V7, P189 Labbe Dominique, 2007, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V14, P33 Hatzigeorgiu N., 2001, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V8, P175 Zipf G. K., 1935, The Psycho-biology of Language, Smith Peter W. H., 2011, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V18, P63 Qiao Wei, 2010, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V17, P142 Zhang Yanhui, 2011, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V18, P189 Cortina-Borja M., 2002, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V9, P97 Pavlyshenko Bohdan, 2013, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V20, P218 Peng Gang, 2008, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V15, P243 Liu Haitao, 2009, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V16, P256 Uhlirova L., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P252 Wimmer G., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P257 2007, Contributions to the Science of Text and Language: Word Length Studies and Related Issues, Balasubrahmanyan V. K., 2000, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V7, P153 Chen Qinghua, 2012, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V19, P232 Kohler R., 1986, Zur linguistischen Synergetik. Struktur und Dynamik der LexikFor linguistic synergetics. Structure and dynamics of lexis, Cech Radek, 2010, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V17, P291 Ke Jinyun, 2008, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS12th Annual Conference of the International-Association-of-Chinese-Linguistics (IACL-12), JUN, 2004, Tianjin, PEOPLES R CHINA, V15, P70 Barbaro S., 2000, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V7, P115 Koehler Reinhard, 2005, QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS / QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTIK, V27, P760 Krylov J. K., 2002, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V9, P125 Abramov Olga, 2011, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V18, P291 Xiao Richard Zhonghua, 2013, CORPUS LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY, V9, P293 Liu H., 2007, Glottometrics, V15, P1 Bagavandas M., 2009, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V16, P115 Ferrer-i-Cancho R., 2007, International Journal of Bifurcation & Chaos in Applied Sciences & Engineering, V17, P2453 Hiro K., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P244 Best K. H., 2001, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V8, P1 Wimmer G., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P1 Kohler R., 2012, Quantitative Syntax Analysis, Murthy K. N., 2006, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V13, P57 Zuse M., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P272 Altmann G., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P269 Kohler R., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P46 Beliaeva L., 2003, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V10, P193 Ziegler A., 2000, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V7, P65 Krott A., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P58 Maragoudakis M., 2005, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V12, P185 Habert B., 2000, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V7, P245 Pande Hemlata, 2012, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V19, P249 Popescu II, 2009, WORD FREQUENCY STUDIES, V64, P1 Liu Haitao, 2011, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V18, P207 Ming D., 2002, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V9, P19 Ziegler A., 1998, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V5, P115 Shi D., 2003, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V10, P41 Liu Haitao, 2008, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V387, P3048 Li Wentian, 2013, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V20, P153 Best K. H., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P97 Putin V., 2003, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V10, P215 Balasubrahmanyan V. K., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P177 Kelih Emmerich, 2012, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V19, P205 Dittrich H., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P260 Abbe S., 2000, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V7, P121 Altmann G., 2004, Readings in Quantitative Linguistics, P1 Grzybek P., 2002, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V9, P187 Altmann G., 1996, Glottometrika, V15, P112 Uhlirova L., 1997, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V4, P266 Andreev S., 2003, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V10, P159 Riedemann H., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P265 Becker C., 1996, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V3, P128 Wimmer G., 1994, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V1, P98 Covington Michael A., 2010, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V17, P94 Best K. H., 2001, Haufigkeitsverteilungen in TextenFrequency Distributions in Texts, Steiner P., 1995, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V2, P133 Sanada-Yogo H., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P239 Forster P., 1998, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V5, P174 Vincze Veronika, 2013, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V20, P314 Mukherjee Animesh, 2009, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V16, P157 Meyer P., 1999, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V6, P66 Vulanovic Relja, 2010, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V17, P229 Bagavandas M., 2008, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V15, P100 Naranan S., 2000, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, V7, P129 Corominas-Murtra Bernat, 2009, ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, V12, P371 Kubat Miroslav, 2013, JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, V20, P339 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000328649000004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: How implementation of *bibliometric* practice affects the role of academic libraries Authors: Astrom, F; Hansson, J Author Full Names: Astrom, Fredrik; Hansson, Joacim Source: JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 45 (4):316-322; 10.1177/0961000612456867 DEC 2013 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Academic libraries, bibliometrics, profession, research evaluation, role of libraries, librarianship KeyWords Plus: AUTHOR COCITATION Abstract: This article discusses potential consequences of implementing bibliometrics as an institutionalized practice in academic libraries. Results are reported from a survey among libraries in Sweden with organized bibliometric activities. Incorporating bibliometric activities is one way of redefining and widening the role of the library. Implementation of bibliometric practice is motivated by ambitions to provide more complete scholarly communication-related services, as well as to increase the visibility and status of libraries. Underlying reasons are professional competencies such as metadata and bibliographic database management; and bibliometrics being strong within library and information science. Incorporating bibliometrics in academic libraries is also seen as a way of widening the professional profile of librarianship. The new role should, however, also be considered from the viewpoint of potential changes in how academic libraries are perceived when incorporating a monitoring function through bibliometric analyses of research performance in addition to traditional service-oriented functions. Addresses: [Astrom, Fredrik] Lund Univ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden. [Hansson, Joacim] Linnaeus Univ, S-35195 Vaxjo, Sweden. E-mail Addresses: joacim.hansson at lnu.se Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 2 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND ISSN: 0961-0006 eISSN: 1741-6477 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: 275BA Unique ID: WOS:000328649000004 Cited References: PENDLEBURY DA, 2009, WHITEPAPER USING BIB, HANSSON J, 2010, LIB IDENTITY ROLE I, STROM F, 2007, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V58, P947 KISHIDA K, 1995, LIB INFORM SCI, V33, P39 White HD, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P327 NARIN F, 1977, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V12, P35 Nolin Jan, 2010, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V66, P7 AYRIS P, 2011, LIBER Q, V20, P332 BRENNAN P, 2008, 2008 LIB ASS C UNPUB, Vanclay Jerome K., 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P265 Ball R, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V66, P561 Whitley R., 2007, The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems, Wilson CS, 1999, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V34, P107 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 SCHREIBER T, 2006, BIBLIOTEKARERNE PROF, WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 CARLSSON H, 2008, INVENTERING BIBLIOME, Jimenez-Contreras E, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P198 DIKEMAN RK, 1975, PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V12, P55 GERRITSMA W, 2010, STI C, Nicholson S, 2003, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND LIBRARIES, V22, P146 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340778700015 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The *Bibliometric* Analysis of Autonomous Learning Studies in China Authors: Wang, LN Author Full Names: Wang Lina Edited by: Kim Y Source: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL SCIENCE, HUMANITIES, AND MANAGEMENT, 43 80-86; 2013 Book Series: Advances in Intelligent Systems Research Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management (ASSHM) Conference Date: DEC 14-15, 2013 Conference Location: Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA Conference Sponsors: Int Assoc Cyber Sci Engn Author Keywords: autonomous learning, CNKI, bibliometrics Abstract: This study retrievals papers on autonomous learning published in 14 key foreign linguistics journals 1 from 1998 to 2012 in CNKI. By using bibliometric method, it conducted a statistical analysis of papers on autonomous learning in three aspects: research contents, research methods and subjects. The analysis reveals that China has made certain progress in the filed of autonomous learning research during 15 years. The number of published papers has been increasing. The research contents are increasingly comprehensive. Moreover, the research methods and subjects are gradually diversified. However, there are still some problems. The research contents are over concentrated with less innovative perspectives. The subjects are unbalanced and the empirical research methods need to be strengthened. On this basis, suggestions on future studies are proposed. Addresses: [Wang Lina] USST, Shanghai Med Instrumentat Coll, Shanghai 200093, Peoples R China. Cited Reference Count: 20 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ATLANTIS PRESS, 29 AVENUE LAVMIERE, PARIS, 75019, FRANCE ISSN: 1951-6851 ISBN: 978-90-78677-93-2 Web of Science Categories: Humanities, Multidisciplinary; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Areas: Arts & Humanities - Other Topics; Social Sciences - Other Topics IDS Number: BB0WH Unique ID: WOS:000340778700015 Cited References: Wenden A. L., 1991, Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy: Planning and Implementing Learner Training for Language Learners, Gao Yihong, 1999, Foreign language Teaching and Research, Tobias S., 1997, Do Metacognitive Skills and Learning Strategies Transfer across Domains?The Symposium on ''Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring'', Cotterall S, 2000, ELT Journal, Lin Zhengjun, 2009, Journal of Xi'an International Studies University, Zhang Qingyun, 2012, Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, Little D., 1991, Learner Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems, Benson P., 2001, Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning, Gordon W. I., 1996, The Design and Development of the Self-regulated Learning Inventory: A Status Report, Nunan D., 1997, Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning, Dickinson L, 1995, System, Egel I. P., 2009, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1997, Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning, Holec H., 1981, Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning, Liu Menglian, 2011, Computer-assisted Foreign Language Education, Hedge T., 2000, Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom, Jili Gao, 2006, Foreign Language Teaching Abroad, Dickinson L, 1992, Learner Training for Language Learning, Allwright D., 1990, CRILE Working Paper 6, Wei Zhang, 2006, Science of Science and Management of S&T, ======================================================================== -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Tue Sep 30 17:29:56 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:29:56 +0000 Subject: papers of possible interest to Sig-Metrics list Message-ID: *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340607500001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Assessing the impact of the funding environment on researchers' risk aversion: the use of *citation* statistics Authors: Zoller, FA; Zimmerling, E; Boutellier, R Author Full Names: Zoller, Frank A.; Zimmerling, Eric; Boutellier, Roman Source: HIGHER EDUCATION, 68 (3):333-345; 10.1007/s10734-014-9714-4 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Allocation, P-R, Risk-taking, Risk-return pattern, Third-party funding, Peer review KeyWords Plus: BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY; HIGHER-EDUCATION; SCIENCE SYSTEM; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; OUTPUT; CONSEQUENCES; DETERMINANTS; PUBLICATIONS Abstract: The funding environment has a profound impact on researchers' behavior. In particular, it influences their freedom and readiness to conduct research ventures with highly uncertain outcomes. In this conceptual paper, we propose a concise new methodology to evaluate researchers' risk aversion based on citation statistics. The derived single-number criterion P-R is sensitive to the ratio of high impact versus average impact work, based on citation counts. We demonstrate the usefulness of P-R on a micro and meso level in the field of chemistry. P-R is a potentially valuable tool for managers in higher education, to control for the impact of their funding instruments. The conducted testing may, in addition, contribute to the literature stream dealing with the effects of peer review in the allocation of research funding. Our results support the view that peer review fosters mainstream research. However, faculties with the highest percentages of third-party funding may find ways to avoid the restrictive effects. We also find evidence that permanent positions back risky research endeavors. Addresses: [Zoller, Frank A.; Zimmerling, Eric; Boutellier, Roman] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Zurich ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland. [Zimmerling, Eric] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management Strategy & Org, D-80333 Munich, Germany. E-mail Addresses: fzoller at ethz.ch; roman.boutellier at sl.ethz.ch Cited Reference Count: 46 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0018-1560 eISSN: 1573-174X Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research Research Areas: Education & Educational Research IDS Number: AN5CS Unique ID: WOS:000340607500001 Cited References: Goldfarb Brent, 2008, RESEARCH POLICY, V37, P41 Considine M., 2000, The enterprise university: Power, governance, and reinvention in Australia, Weber L., 2004, Reinventing the research university, Bolli Thomas, 2011, RESEARCH POLICY, V40, P136 Neuhaus Christoph, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P193 Carayol N, 2006, INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, V18, P55 Braun Dietmar, 2003, Science and Public Policy, V30, P302 Lewison G, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V41, P17 National Science Foundation National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2011, Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2009, V2011, Moed HF, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V35, P177 Auranen Otto, 2010, RESEARCH POLICY, V39, P822 Hornbostel S, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V50, P523 Kuhn T., 1962, The structure of scientific revolutions, Van Leeuwen Thed N., 2007, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V16, P93 Lepori B., 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P372 Laudel G, 2006, HIGHER EDUCATION, V52, P375 PAO ML, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V20, P257 Henkel M., 2000, Academic identities and policy change in higher education, V46, Shove Elizabeth, 2003, Science and Public Policy, V30, P371 Tatsioni Athina, 2010, FASEB JOURNAL, V24, P1335 Van der Meulen B, 1998, RESEARCH POLICYConference on the Need for a New Economics of Science, MAR 13-16, 1997, S BEND, INDIANA, V27, P397 Heinze Thomas, 2009, RESEARCH POLICY40th Conference on the Future of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, SEP 11-13, 2006, Brighton, ENGLAND, V38, P610 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Musselin C, 2005, HIGHER EDUCATION, V49, P135 Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P353 Bovier PA, 2001, JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, V49, P77 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 Daniel H. D., 2001, Wissenschaftsevaluation: Neuere Entwicklungen und heutiger Stand der Forschungs-und Hochschulevaluation in ausgewahlten Landern, Melin G, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P363 Abramo Giovanni, 2009, RESEARCH POLICY, V38, P206 Butler L, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 16-20, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V32, P143 Liefner I, 2003, HIGHER EDUCATION, V46, P469 Bonaccorsi A, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Rethinking Science Policy, MAR 21-23, 2002, BRIGHTON, ENGLAND, V58, P49 Weingart P, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P117 Tammi Timo, 2009, HIGHER EDUCATION, V57, P657 Zhao Dangzhi, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P293 Heinze T., 2008, Science and Public Policy, V35, P302 Carayol N, 2004, RESEARCH POLICY, V33, P1081 Dundar H, 1998, RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, V39, P607 Whitley R, 2003, RESEARCH POLICYConference on Asia-Pacific Researchers in Organization Studies, DEC 03-05, 2001, HONG KONG, V32, P1015 Laudel G., 2006, Science and Public Policy, V33, P489 Van Raan AFJ, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P491 Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V78, P23 Leitner Karl-Heinz, 2007, HIGHER EDUCATION, V53, P517 Defazio Daniela, 2009, RESEARCH POLICY, V38, P293 Geuna A, 2001, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, V35, P607 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340854600004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Normal tissue studies in radiation oncology: A systematic review of highly cited articles and *citation* patterns Authors: Nieder, C; Andratschke, NH; Grosu, AL Author Full Names: Nieder, Carsten; Andratschke, Nicolaus H.; Grosu, Anca L. Source: ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 8 (3):972-976; 10.3892/ol.2014.2252 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: radiotherapy, radiation oncology, normal tissue, side effects, citation, research evaluation KeyWords Plus: CELL LUNG-CANCER; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; PROSTATE-CANCER; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; RISK; TOXICITY; INJURY; IRRADIATION; FIBROSIS Abstract: Radiation therapy is one of the cornerstones of modern multidisciplinary cancer treatment. Normal tissue tolerance is critical as radiation-induced side effects may compromise organ function and quality of life. The importance of normal tissue research is reflected by the large number of scientific articles, which have been published between 2006 and 2010. The present study identified important areas of research as well as seminal publications. The article citation rate is among the potential indicators of scientific impact. Highly cited articles, arbitrarily defined as those with >= 15 citations, were identified via a systematic search of the citation database, Scopus. Up to 608 articles per.year were published between 2006 and 2010, however, <10% of publications in each year accumulated >= 15 citations. This figure is notably low, when compared with other oncology studies. A large variety of preclinical and clinical topics, including toxicity prediction, the dose-volume relationship and radioprotectors, accumulated >= 15 citations. However, clinical prevention or mitigation studies were underrepresented. The following conclusion may be drawn from the present study; despite the improved technology that has resulted in superior dose distribution, clinical prevention or mitigation studies are critical and must receive higher priority, funding and attention. Addresses: [Nieder, Carsten] Nordland Hosp, Dept Oncol & Palliat Med, N-8092 Bodo, Norway. [Nieder, Carsten] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Inst Clin Med, N-9038 Tromso, Norway. [Andratschke, Nicolaus H.] Univ Hosp Rostock, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-18059 Rostock, Germany. [Grosu, Anca L.] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. E-mail Addresses: carsten.nieder at nlsh.no Cited Reference Count: 45 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD, POB 18179, ATHENS, 116 10, GREECE ISSN: 1792-1074 eISSN: 1792-1082 Web of Science Categories: Oncology Research Areas: Oncology IDS Number: AN8LB Unique ID: WOS:000340854600004 Cited References: Soehn Matthias, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS48th Annual Meeting of the American-Society-for-Therapeutic-Radiology-and-Oncology, NOV 05-09, 2006, Philadelphia, PA, V67, P1066 Nieder C, Anticancer Res, P27 Francois Sabine, 2006, STEM CELLS, V24, P1020 Weiss Joseph F., 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, V85, P539 Kong Feng-Ming, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS13th European Cancer Conference (ECCO 13), OCT 30-NOV 03, 2005, Paris, FRANCE, V65, P1075 Kanaan Ziad, 2011, ANNALS OF SURGERY, V253, P619 Michalski Jeff M., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V76, PS123 Kulkarni Abhaya V., 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Citrin Deborah, 2010, ONCOLOGIST, V15, P360 Mangoni M., 2012, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, V107, P308 Shirazi Alireza, 2007, JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, V48, P263 Yuan Xianglin, 2009, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, V27, P3370 Darby Sarah C., 2013, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V368, P987 Nieder C., 2012, STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, V188, P865 Lofdahl Elisabet, 2012, RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V7, Giotopoulos G., 2007, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, V96, P1001 Maraldo M. V., 2013, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, V24, P2113 Yarnold John, 2010, RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, V97, P149 Wazer DE, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V64, P489 Kondziolka Douglas, 2011, STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, V89, P56 Padovani Laetitia, 2012, NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, V8, P578 Bentzen Soren M., 2007, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, V25, P4096 Burri Ryan J., 2008, RADIATION RESEARCH53rd Annual Meeting of the Radiation-Research-Society, NOV 05-08, 2006, Philadelphia, PA, V170, P49 Fiorino Claudio, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V70, P1130 Gulliford Sarah L., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V76, P747 Nieder Carsten, 2007, RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V2, Kirkpatrick John P., 2008, SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V18, P240 Kouvaris John R., 2007, ONCOLOGIST, V12, P738 Young Neal S., 2008, PLOS MEDICINE, V5, P1418 Raabe Annette, 2012, RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V7, Bentzen Soren M., 2006, NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, V6, P702 Nieder C, 2003, ANTICANCER RESEARCH, V23, P4991 Durieux Valerie, 2010, RADIOLOGY, V255, P342 Mayer Ramona, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V70, P1350 Fiorino Claudio, 2009, RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, V93, P153 Bentzen Soren M., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V76, PS3 Nieder Carsten, 2012, CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, V114, P1207 Stringer Michael J., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1377 Clarke Richard E., 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V72, P134 Zhao Weiling, 2009, CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, V16, P130 Braam Petra M., 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V66, P975 Vinkler P, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P687 Radicchi Filippo, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P17268 Moding Everett J., 2013, NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, V12, P526 Barnett Gillian C., 2009, NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, V9, P134 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340951200001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Applications and researches of geographic information system technologies in *bibliometrics* Authors: Wang, XM; Ma, MG; Li, X; Zhang, ZQ Author Full Names: Wang Xuemei; Ma Mingguo; Li Xin; Zhang Zhiqiang Source: EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 7 (3):147-152; 10.1007/s12145-013-0132-4 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: Bibliometrics, Geographic information system (GIS), Spatial visualization, Spatial analysis KeyWords Plus: H-INDEX; SCIENCE; EXCELLENCE; LIBRARY; REGIONS; CITIES; MAPS; GIS Abstract: Although the research and application of a geographic information system (GIS) in bibliometrics remains in its initial stage, several valuable attempts have been made in recent years. This paper provides our overview regarding this area. We first reviewed the spatial information mining derived from literature, including structured and unstructured data. The spatial display and the basic spatial operations for the geographic information derived from literature were then introduced, demonstrating that GIS can be directly used to construct digital libraries. Some literature database websites have begun to utilize WEBGIS to display the spatial distribution of an author's location. Additionally, the spatial distribution information can be displayed in various modes with other specialized tools. Potential spatial analyses in bibliometrics were then discussed, introducing geostatistical and buffer analyses as case studies. Finally, several bibliometric indicators attached with research units were investigated. When the quantitative research index units are linked with the research spatial position, they can be displayed, queried and retrieved spatially. Future work to advance the application and research of GIS in bibliometrics is still warranted. Addresses: [Wang Xuemei; Ma Mingguo; Li Xin] Chinese Acad Sci, Cold & Arid Reg Environm & Engn Res Inst, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China. [Wang Xuemei; Zhang Zhiqiang] Chinese Acad Sci, Sci Informat Ctr Resources & Environm, Natl Sci Lib, Lanzhou Branch, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: mmg at lzb.ac.cn Funding Acknowledgement: National Natural Science Foundation of China [40701133]; Chinese Academy of Sciences Funding Text: Under the Special Project of Literature Ability of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.: 40701133). Cited Reference Count: 45 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY ISSN: 1865-0473 eISSN: 1865-0481 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary Research Areas: Computer Science; Geology IDS Number: AN9TH Unique ID: WOS:000340951200001 Cited References: Schreiber Michael, 2008, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V2, P211 Ma D, 2009, Proceedings of International Symposium on Spatial Analysis, Spatial-Temporal Data Modeling, and Data Mining (ISSA 2009), Wuhan, P1 Frenken Koen, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P222 Ancona D, 2002, VISUAL INTERFACES TO DIGITAL LIBRARIES2nd International Workshop on Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries held at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), JUL 18, 2002, PORTLAND, OREGON, V2539, P199 WOODRUFF AG, 1994, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V45, P645 Chen Chaomei, 2008, DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, V67, P234 PRITCHAR.A, 1969, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V25, P348 Liu L, 2008, J Inf, V1, P133 ???, 2011, ????Chinese Science Bulletin, V56, P3115 Hengl Tomislav, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P491 Zhao Rongying, 2010, Journal of Library Science in China, V36, P60 Barbara LH, 2010, The Undiscover'd Country, Barbara PB, 1998, Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst, V25, P161 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P537 Bornmann Lutz, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P333 Wu Jiang, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P181 French M, 1999, The ARL GIS literacy project: support for government data services in the digital library, Vanclay Jerome K., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P211 WANG XZ, 2009, STUD FUZZINESS SOFT, V245, P1 Hassan Saeed-Ul, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P163 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Garfield E, 1998, UNFALLCHIRURG, V101, P413 Leydesdorff Loet, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1622 Vinkler P., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P861 Ahlgren Per, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P771 Cai G, 2002, Proceedings of Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, Portland, P171 Bellis DN, 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the Science citation index to cybermetrics, P417 Allen RS, 2001, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIES, V21, P191 Bornmann Lutz, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P336 van Eck Nees Jan, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523 Bensalem I., 2010, Journal of Computer Sciences, V6, Allison W, 1994, J Am Soc Inf Sci, V45, P645 Bornmann Lutz, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P830 Carvalho R, 2006, J Stat Mech: Theor Exp, V2006, Glanzel W, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 17, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V53, P171 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P547 Pouliquen B, 2006, Proceedings of LREC-2006, P53 ???, 2012, ??????Advance in Earth Sciences, V27, P1288 Boerner Katy, 2011, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, V54, P60 Olechnicka A, 2010, Collnet J Scientometrics Inf Manag, V4, P21 Leydesdorff Loet, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1442 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1954 Leidner JL, 2007, Toponym resolution in text: annotation, evaluation and applications of spatial grounding of place names, P289 Smith TR, 1996, COMPUTER, V29, P54 Bishop Bradley Wade, 2010, LIBRARY HI TECH, V28, P536 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340607500004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Working in separate silos? What *citation* patterns reveal about higher education research internationally Authors: Tight, M Author Full Names: Tight, Malcolm Source: HIGHER EDUCATION, 68 (3):379-395; 10.1007/s10734-014-9718-0 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Higher education research, Journal articles, Citation patterns KeyWords Plus: JOURNALS; DISCIPLINE; DISCOURSE Abstract: Higher education research is a growing, inter-disciplinary and increasingly international field of study. This article examines the citation patterns of articles published in six leading higher education journals-three published in the United States and three published elsewhere in the world-for what they reveal about the development of this field. The analysis shows that the American journals are not only dominated by American-based authors, but that they also cite predominantly articles, books, chapters and other publications published in the United States. By contrast, the three non-American journals accommodate a much broader spread internationally of both authors and citations. Possible explanations for these patterns, and whether they matter, are discussed. Addresses: Univ Lancaster, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster LA1 4YL, England. E-mail Addresses: m.tight at lancaster.ac.uk Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0018-1560 eISSN: 1573-174X Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research Research Areas: Education & Educational Research IDS Number: AN5CS Unique ID: WOS:000340607500004 Cited References: Bassett R., 2006, Higher education: A worldwide inventory of centers and programs, P283 Horta Hugo, 2014, HIGHER EDUCATION, V68, P117 Tight M., 2012, Researching higher education, 2006, Higher Education: a worldwide inventory of centers and programs, Tight M., 2012, Tertiary Education and Administration, V18, P271 Shahjahan Riyad A., 2013, EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, V42, P20 Brennan John, 2008, HIGHER EDUCATION, V56, P259 Marginson S., 2013, The development of higher education research in Europe: 25 Years of CHER, P87 Tight Malcolm, 2007, HIGHER EDUCATION, V53, P235 Warner J, 2000, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V26, P453 Cronin B., 1984, The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, Donaldson Joe F., 2007, JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, V78, P27 Budd John M., 2010, RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, V51, P294 Jung J., 2013, Higher Education Quarterly, V67, P398 Hart J, 2006, JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, V77, P40 Hyland K., 2000, Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing, Hart Jeni, 2010, JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, V81, P140 Desmedt E., 2004, Educational Psychology, V24, P445 Tight Malcolm, 2008, HIGHER EDUCATION, V55, P593 Tight Malcolm, 2014, RESEARCH PAPERS IN EDUCATION, V29, P93 Tight M., 2009, Academic research and researchers, P54 Hyland K., 2012, Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse, Haggis Tamsin, 2009, STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATIONHigher Education Close Up Four Conference (HECU 4), JUN, 2008, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA, V34, P377 2013, The development of higher education research in Europe: 25 Years of CHER, Teixeira P., 2013, The development of higher education research in Europe: 25 Years of CHER, P103 Tight M., 2006, Higher Education Review, V38, P42 Tight M., 2003, Researching higher education, Tight M., 2004, Higher Education Research and Development, V23, P395 BUDD JM, 1990, JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, V61, P84 White HD, 2004, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V25, P89 Tight Malcolm, 2013, HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, V32, P136 Tight Malcolm, 2012, HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, V31, P723 Kandlbinder Peter, 2012, HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, V31, P5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- iew VIEW FULL Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569800006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Distance and velocity measures: using *citations* to determine breadth and speed of research impact Authors: Garner, J; Porter, AL; Newman, NC Author Full Names: Garner, Jon; Porter, Alan L.; Newman, Nils C. Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (3):687-703; 10.1007/s11192-014-1316-5 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Knowledge diffusion, Bibliometrics, Citation analysis, Diffusion score, Velocity measure, Distance measure KeyWords Plus: INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; SCIENCE Abstract: Research that integrates the social and natural sciences is vital to address many societal challenges, yet is difficult to arrange, conduct, and disseminate. This paper compares diffusion of the research supported by a unique U.S. National Science Foundation program on Human and Social Dynamics ("HSD") with a matched group of heavily cited papers. We offer a measure of the distance of cites between the Web of Science Category ("WoSC") in which a publication appears and the WoSC of the journal citing it, and find that HSD publications are cited more distantly than are comparison publications. We provide another measure-citation velocity-finding that HSD publications are cited with similar lag times as are the comparison papers. These basic citation distance and velocity measures enrich analyses of research knowledge diffusion patterns. Addresses: [Garner, Jon; Porter, Alan L.] Search Technol Inc, Norcross, GA 30092 USA. [Porter, Alan L.] Georgia Tech, Technol Policy & Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA. [Newman, Nils C.] IISC, Atlanta, GA USA. E-mail Addresses: jon.garner at searchtech.com Funding Acknowledgement: Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation (NSF) award [BCS-0968924] Funding Text: This work was supported by the Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation (NSF) award: "EAGER: Assessing the Interdisciplinarity and Research Networking Impacts of the Human and Social Dynamics Priority Area Program [Award No. BCS-0968924]. The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The research was undertaken at Search Technology, Inc. Cited Reference Count: 25 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN4PJ Unique ID: WOS:000340569800006 Cited References: PORTER AL, 1983, INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, V8, P158 Wagner Caroline S., 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P14 Birnbaum-More P. H., 1990, International research management, Ponomarev I., 2012, Predicting highly cited papers: A method for early detection of candidate breakthroughs, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Rafols Ismael, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P263 Falk-Krzesinski H. J., 2010, Science of team science. Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia, Rafols I., 2009, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V60, P348 Carley Stephen, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P407 Klein J. T., 1996, Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities, Porter A. L., 2012, Porter Alan L., 2008, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V17, P273 Porter Alan L., 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P29 Boyack KW, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V64, P351 Porter Alan L., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P117 National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP), 2005, Facilitating interdisciplinary research, Porter Alan L., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P719 Leydesdorff L, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P601 Caruso D., 2001, Lead, follow, get out of the way: Sidestepping the barriers to effective practice of interdisciplinarity, Garner Jon, 2013, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V22, P134 Stirling Andy, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, V4, P707 Stokols Daniel, 2008, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, V35, PS77 Porter Alan L., 2006, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V15, P187 1986, Interdisciplinary analysis and research, ROSSINI FA, 1979, RESEARCH POLICY, V8, P70 Klein J. T., 2000, Practising interdisciplinarity, P3 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340670100008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: *Bibliometric* analysis on Australian rural health publications from 2006 to 2012 Authors: Mendis, K; Edwards, T; Stevens, W; McCrossin, T Author Full Names: Mendis, Kumara; Edwards, Tegan; Stevens, Wendy; McCrossin, Tim Source: AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 22 (4):189-196; 10.1111/ajr.12122 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Australia, bibliometric analysis, research, rural health Abstract: Objective: To review Australian rural health (ARH) publications in PubMed from 2006 to 2012 and address ARH issues raised by the 2013 Health and Medical Research report. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Internet-based bibliometric analysis using PubMed. MEDLINE-indexed ARH publications from 2006 to 2012 were retrieved using PubMed queries. ARH publications were defined as Australian publications that explore issues relevant to the health of the regional, rural or remote Australian population. Two authors independently reviewed a random sample of 5% of publications for validity. Main outcome measures: Analysis determined country of origin (Australia); publications relevant to the National Health Priority Areas, the 2013 National Rural Health Alliance priority areas and Rural Clinical Schools/University Departments of Rural Health; and journal frequencies and publication types. Results: ARH publications increased from 286 in 2006 to 393 in 2012 and made up 1.4% of all Australian PubMed publications. Combined, the health priority areas were addressed in 52% of ARH publications. Rural Clinical Schools/University Departments of Rural Health articles made up 7% of ARH publications. An increase in cohort studies, systematic reviews and reviews indicated improved quality of articles. ARH articles were most commonly published in the Australian Journal of Rural Health (15.9%), Rural and Remote Health (13.4%) and the Medical Journal of Australia (6.3%). Striking a balance between broadening the queries (increasing sensitivity) and limiting the false positives by restricting the breadth of the queries (increasing specificity) was the main limitation. Conclusions: This reproducible analysis, repeated at given timelines, can track the progress of ARH publications and provide directions regarding future rural health research. Addresses: [Mendis, Kumara; Edwards, Tegan; Stevens, Wendy; McCrossin, Tim] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Med, Bathurst Rural Clin Sch, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia. E-mail Addresses: k.mendis at uws.edu.au Cited Reference Count: 23 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 1038-5282 eISSN: 1440-1584 Web of Science Categories: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Nursing Research Areas: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Nursing IDS Number: AN5YX Unique ID: WOS:000340670100008 Cited References: Robinson KA, 2002, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, V31, P150 Perkins David, 2013, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, V21, P1 NSW Ministry of Health, 2013, NSW Rural Heath Plan Issues Paper, National E-Health Transition Authority, 2013, The personally controlled eHealth record system, Mendis Kumara, 2010, Informatics in primary care, V18, P223 McDonald John, 2009, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, V17, P124 Gregory Gordon, 2010, The Australian journal of rural health, V18, P134 National Health and Medical Research Council, 2012, NHMRC funded research into rural and remote health related issues 2000-2012, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012, Regional population growth, Australia, 2011, Haynes R. B., 2001, Evidence-based Medicine, V6, P36 McWhinney I, 2009, Textbook of Family Medicine, Perkins David, 2013, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, V21, P137 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2013, Strategic Review of Health and Medical Research: Better Health through Research. Final Report February 2013, National Rural Health Alliance Australian Health Ministers'Advisory Council's National Rural Health Policy Sub-committee, 2003, Healthy horizons outlook 2003-2007: a framework for improving the health of rural, regional and remote Australia, Liaw S-T, 2006, The Australian journal of rural health, V14, P95 National Centre for Biotechnology Information, 2013, United States National Library of Medicine, Patterson C, 2000, The Australian journal of rural health, V8, P286 Van Der Weyden MB, 2003, MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, V179, P6 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2008, Rural, regional and remote health: indicators of health status and determinants of health, McLean R, 2007, Rural and Remote Health, V1, P767 COAG Reform Council, 2013, Healthcare 2011-2012: Comparing Performance across Australia, Butler L, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 16-20, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V32, P143 Bourke P., 1997, Report No. 56, ======================================================================= ) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340882600007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Scientific collaboration in the sphere of carbon nanostructures in the mirror of *bibliometric* analysis Authors: Terekhov, AI Author Full Names: Terekhov, A. I. Source: HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 84 (4):265-271; 10.1134/S1019331614040030 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Abstract: This article provides bibliometric analysis of Russian scientists' collaboration in the sphere of carbon nanostructures, a major trend in nanotechnology. In particular, it is shown that international coauthorship significantly increases the citation of Russian publications, while purely Russian coauthored publications are cited even less frequently, on average, than single-author publications. The initial information for analysis was taken from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database. Addresses: RAS Cent Econ & Math Inst CEMI, Moscow, Russia. E-mail Addresses: a.i.terekhov at mail.ru Cited Reference Count: 6 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013-1578 USA ISSN: 1019-3316 eISSN: 1555-6492 Web of Science Categories: History & Philosophy Of Science; Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: History & Philosophy of Science; Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AN8VG Unique ID: WOS:000340882600007 Cited References: Glanzel W., 2004, Terekhov A. I., 2006, Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures, V14, Vul' A. Ya., Nanocarbon: Research and Utilization, Terekhov A. I., 2012, Economic Problems of the Development of Revolutionary Technologies: Nanotechnologies, King C., Multiauthor papers: Onward and upward, Karpagam R., 2011, Scientometrics, V89, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340728900001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: What Happened to the Public Organization? A *Bibliometric* Analysis of Public Administration and Organization Studies Authors: Vogel, R Author Full Names: Vogel, Rick Source: AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 44 (4):383-408; 10.1177/0275074012470867 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: co-citation analysis, journals, two-mode network, network analysis, public administration, public organization KeyWords Plus: TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS; FIRM; EMBEDDEDNESS; CAPABILITIES; PERFORMANCE; COCITATION; AGENCIES Abstract: Despite their common roots in the early theories of organization, public administration and organization studies have evolved separately. This article explores the conditions that favor and initiate the cross-boundary exchange of knowledge between these two fields. The study applies bibliometric methodology and advances standard methods of science-mapping by combining different levels of analysis in a two-mode network, drawing on citation data from 16 European and North American top journals in organization studies and public administration, spanning the period 2000 to 2010. None of the 18 clusters of current research extracted from these data can be traced in both organization studies and public administration, however closer analysis reveals two strong links between these fields and indicates that the boundaries between them are semipermeable, allowing the unidirectional, rather than bidirectional, transfer of knowledge from organization studies to public administration. This study argues for greater rapprochement between these two fields and suggests ways in which this could be achieved. Addresses: Zeppelin Univ, D-88045 Friedrichshafen, Germany. E-mail Addresses: rick.vogel at zeppelin-university.de Cited Reference Count: 169 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA ISSN: 0275-0740 eISSN: 1552-3357 Web of Science Categories: Public Administration Research Areas: Public Administration IDS Number: AN6TA Unique ID: WOS:000340728900001 Cited References: OLIVER C, 1992, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V13, P563 Burt R. S., 2008, Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital, Luckmann T., 1967, The social construction of reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Huff Anne, 2006, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, V15, P413 Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory, Walsh James P., 2007, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, V16, P128 Kingdon J. W., 1984, Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, Lynn L. E., 1996, Public management as art, science, and profession, Denhardt R. B., 2004, Theories of public organization, Ferlie E., 1996, The new public management in action, BARLEY SR, 1992, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLYCONF ON SOCIO-ECONOMICS, MAR, 1989, CAMBRIDGE, MA, V37, P363 Kickert W. J. M., 1997, Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector, Weber Edward P., 2008, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, V68, P334 Rhodes R. A. W., 1997, Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Ridder HG, 2006, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEWAnnual Meeting of the European-Group-of-Public-Administration, SEP 01-04, 2004, Ljubljana, SLOVENIA, V8, P87 HOOD C, 1991, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, V69, P3 POWELL WW, 1990, RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, V12, P295 Giddens Anthony, 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration, Boyne G. A., 2003, Evaluating public management reforms: Principles and practice, Olson J.P., 1989, Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics, Barzelay M., 1992, Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government, Williamson Oliver E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Agranoff R., 2003, Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments, Walsh K., 1995, Public services and market mechanisms: Competition, contracting and the new public management, PETTIGREW AM, 1979, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V24, P570 Simon H. A., 1947, Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization, Battilana Julie, 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P695 Osborne D., 1992, Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector, Moore M. H., 1995, Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Merton R. K., 1952, Reader in bureaucracy, Bozeman B., 1993, Public management. The state of the art, P27 Brunsson N., 1993, The reforming organization, Sapru R. K., 2008, Administrative theories and management thought, BARON RM, 1986, JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V51, P1173 Terry LD, 1998, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW19th Annual Association-for-Public-Policy-Analysis-and-Management Conference, NOV 06-08, 1997, WASHINGTON, D.C., V58, P194 Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNALCCC/Tuck Conference on the Evolution of Firm Capabilities, SEP 25-26, 1999, HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE, V21, P1105 Spender JC, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V17, P45 GRANOVETTER M, 1985, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V91, P481 1996, Public management: The New Zealand model, Rainey HG, 1999, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V9, P1 OToole LJ, 1997, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEWPublic Affairs Workshop, APR 26, 1995, MADISON, WI, V57, P45 Audit Commission, 2001, Changing gear. Best value annual statement 2001, USDIKEN B, 1995, ORGANIZATION STUDIES11th EGOS Colloquium, JUL 06-08, 1993, PARIS, FRANCE, V16, P503 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Crane D., 1972, Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities, Foss Nicolai J., 2007, ORGANIZATION, V14, P29 Gmur M, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V57, P27 SCHNEIDER B, 1987, PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, V40, P437 Kuhn T. S., 1970, The structure of scientific revolutions, Donahue J. D., 1989, The privatization decision: Public ends, private means, Beckert J, 1999, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V20, P777 HOOD C, 1995, ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETYEIASM Workshop on Accounting, Accountability and the New European Public Sector, SEP, 1992, HELSINKI, FINLAND, V20, P93 LEVITT B, 1988, ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, V14, P319 PERRY JL, 1988, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V13, P182 PROVAN KG, 1995, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V40, P1 Kunda G., 1992, Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation, Coleman J. S., 1988, Am. J. Sociol., V94, P95 Milward H. B., 2000, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V10, P359 Hood C., 1998, The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric, and public management, Waterman R., 1991, American Political Science Review, V85, P801 Burt R.S., 1992, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Marsh D., 1992, Policy networks in British government, Mosher F. C., 1982, Democracy and the public service, Berry FS, 2004, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW7th National Public Management Research Conference, OCT 09-11, 2003, Washington, DC, V64, P539 KOGUT B, 1992, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V3, P383 DUTTON JE, 1994, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V39, P239 Barley SR, 1996, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V41, P404 Scott R. W., 1995, Institutions and organizations. Ideas and interests, Blau P. M., 1955, The Dynamics of Bureaucracy, Rowley T, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V21, P369 Frederickson H. G., 1997, The spirit of public administration, Downs A., 1967, Inside bureaucracy, Grey Christopher, 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P677 Kettl D. F., 1993, Sharing power: Public governance and private markets, BUCHANAN B, 1975, ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, V6, P423 Tullock G., 1965, The politics of bureaucracy, Cummings Thomas G., 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V32, P355 Miles M. B., 1994, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Fernandez Sergio, 2009, ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, V41, P67 Argyris C., 1978, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Niskanen W. A., 1971, Bureaucracy and representative government, Anderson Gina, 2008, ORGANIZATION, V15, P251 Pollitt C., 2000, Public management reform: A comparative analysis, WIERSEMA MF, 1992, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V35, P91 Stoker G., 2004, Transforming local government from Thatcherism to new labour, Putnam RD, 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Mahoney Joseph T., 2009, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V20, P1034 Department for the Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR), 1998, Modern local government: In touch with the people, Wilson J. Q., 1989, Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it, SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Crozier M., 1964, The bureaucratic phenomenon, Gioia DA, 2000, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V25, P63 Selznick P., 1957, Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation, Shapiro Debra L., 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V50, P249 Saz-Carranza Angel, 2012, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V14, P331 KNIGHTS D, 1989, SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, V23, P535 Jarzabkowski P., 2012, Organization Studies, V31, P1189 Burt RS, 2000, RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 22, 2000, V22, P345 Pfeffer J., 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Hargens LL, 2000, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V65, P846 Savas E. S., 2000, Privatization and public-private partnerships, Teece D., 1997, Strategic Management Journal, V8, P509 Meyer Renate E., 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P737 RAINEY HG, 1983, ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, V15, P207 Simon H.A., 1958, Organizations, Aucoin Peter, 1990, Governance, V3, P115 LEONARDBARTON D, 1992, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V13, P111 Miller Danny, 2009, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, V18, P273 Pollitt C., 1993, Managerialism and the public services: Cuts or cultural change in the 1990s?, HANNAN MT, 1984, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V49, P149 Nonaka I., 1995, The knowledge creating company., Whitley R., 1984, The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, DIMAGGIO PJ, 1983, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V48, P147 BERRY FS, 1994, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, V54, P322 Wilson W., 1887, Political Science Quarterly, V2, P197 Rethemeyer R. Karl, 2008, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, V18, P617 Schalk Jelmer, 2010, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, V20, P629 Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Rynes SL, 2005, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V48, P925 Carmeli A, 2006, LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, V32, P153 Peters B. G., 2000, Governance, politics and the state, Thomas R, 2005, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V26, P683 Cyert RM, 1963, A behavioral theory of the firm, Kelman S., 2003, International Public Management Review, V4, P2 Sclar E. D., 2000, You don't always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization, CONNER KR, 1991, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V17, P121 Allison Jr G. T., 1983, Public management: Public and private perspectives, P72 Brunsson N, 2000, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V21, P721 Weick K. E., 1979, The social psychology of organizing, Selznick Philip, 1943, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V8, P47 Nelson R., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V14, P532 Aiken LS, 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Weick K. E., 1995, Sensemaking in organizations, Lipsky M, 1980, Street-level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, Davis C. R, 1996, Organization theories and public administration, PERRY JL, 1990, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, V50, P367 2001, New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice, Carpenter D. P., 2001, The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928, Weber M., 1921, Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, Meier K., 1999, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V9, P505 Wasserman S., 1994, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Ashworth Rachel, 2009, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, V19, P165 Van der Stede W. A., 2012, Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives, Freeman L. C., 2002, Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis, COHEN WM, 1990, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V35, P128 Starkey K, 2001, BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V12, PS3 Kelman Steven, 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, V1, P225 MEYER JW, 1977, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V83, P340 Perry J., 2000, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V10, P471 Choi Sungjoo, 2009, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORYAnnual Meeting of the American-Political-Science-Association, AUG 30-SEP 02, 2007, Chicago, IL, V19, P603 Usdiken Behlul, 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P715 Fayol H., 1917, General and Industrial ManagementAdministration industrielle et generale: Prevoyance, organisation, commandement, coordination, controle, Meyer J. W., 1983, Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality, March James G., 1991, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V2, P71 MCCUBBINS MD, 1989, VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, V75, P431 MCCAIN KW, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P433 Verbeek A, 2002, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, V4, P179 Newman J., 1997, The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare, BARNEY JB, 1986, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V32, P1230 Greenwood R, 1996, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V21, P1022 BARNEY J, 1991, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V17, P99 Orlikowski WJ, 2002, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V13, P249 Newman J., 2001, Modernising governance: New Labour, policy and society, Harmon M., 1986, Organization theory for public administration, Rousseau DM, 2006, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V31, P256 1937, Papers on the science of administration, Lambright Kristina T., 2010, AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, V40, P64 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569700007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Accounting and Finance: authorship and *citation* trends Authors: Gaunt, C Author Full Names: Gaunt, Clive Source: ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 54 (2):441-465; 10.1111/acfi.12061 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Journal impact, Accounting and Finance, Education KeyWords Plus: EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; CORPORATE DISCLOSURE; AGENCY COSTS; CONSERVATISM; INFORMATION; RETURNS; QUALITY; FIRM; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE Abstract: Accounting and Finance (A&F) has experienced a surge in published research in the last decade. The analysis here reveals a marked increase in the number of published articles in A&F since 2003, a distinct trend for published papers to have a larger number of authors, a significant and stable contribution by the top 5 Australian accounting/finance departments, as well as a notable increase in contribution from non-US foreign universities, particularly those located in the UK, Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore and Spain. An analysis of citations indicates the increasing impact of A&F in recent years. Addresses: Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. Cited Reference Count: 67 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0810-5391 eISSN: 1467-629X Web of Science Categories: Business, Finance Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AN4PI Unique ID: WOS:000340569700007 Cited References: Tinaikar S., 2004, Accounting and Finance, V44, P223 Kothari SP, 2005, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, V39, P163 Brownell P, 1987, Accounting and Finance, V27, P1 Engers M, 1999, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V107, P859 Lang MH, 1996, ACCOUNTING REVIEW, V71, P467 FAMA EF, 1993, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, V33, P3 Yermack D, 1996, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, V40, P185 Ramsay A., 2003, Accounting and Finance, V43, P41 Watts R, 1986, Positive Accounting Theory, Wyatt A., 2006, Accounting and Finance, V46, P457 Edge W. R, 1991, Accounting and Finance, V31, P69 Ball R, 2005, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, V39, P83 Gallagher D. R., 2006, Accounting and Finance, V46, P125 Chan K. C, 2012, Accounting and Finance, V52, P249 La Porta R, 1998, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V106, P1113 LANG M, 1993, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, V31, P246 Partington G., 1999, Accounting and Finance, V39, P275 Gray S., 2006, Accounting and Finance, V46, P405 Monroe G. S., 1993, Accounting and Finance, V33, P79 Carson Elizabeth, 2007, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, V47, P423 DECHOW PM, 1995, ACCOUNTING REVIEW, V70, P193 Wells P., 2002, Accounting and Finance, V42, P169 Gray P., 2000, Accounting and Finance, V40, P33 WHITE H, 1980, ECONOMETRICA, V48, P817 Trotman K, 2000, Acc. Finance, V40, P169 Carey P., 2006, Accounting and Finance, V46, P11 Brown Christopher L., 2011, APPLIED ECONOMICS, V43, P3687 JENSEN MC, 1986, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V76, P323 Abernethy MA, 1994, Accounting and Finance, V34, P49 Arnold V., 2004, Accounting and Finance, V44, P1 Davidson R., 2005, Accounting and Finance, V45, P241 FAMA EF, 1983, JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, V26, P301 JONES JJ, 1991, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, V29, P193 Lai Cheng, 2008, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, V48, P673 JENSEN MC, 1993, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, V48, P831 Beasley MS, 1996, ACCOUNTING REVIEW, V71, P443 JENSEN MC, 1976, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, V3, P305 Frankel RM, 2002, ACCOUNTING REVIEW, V77, P71 Zimmer I., 1986, Accounting and Finance, V26, P19 MYERS SC, 1977, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, V5, P147 Sloan RG, 1996, ACCOUNTING REVIEW, V71, P289 Basu S, 1997, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, V24, P3 Gul F. A, 2006, Accounting and Finance, V46, P797 Schulz A. K. D, 2002, Accounting and Finance, V42, P73 Wines G, 1994, Accounting and Finance, V34, P75 Coram Paul, 2008, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, V48, P543 Balkrishna Harishankar, 2007, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, V47, P381 Clarkson P, 2006, Accounting and Finance, V46, P771 FAMA EF, 1992, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, V47, P427 Barth M. E, 2000, Accounting and Finance, V40, P7 Jones K. L., 1999, Accounting and Finance, V39, P229 FAMA EF, 1973, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V81, P607 Yi Meng C, 2005, Accounting and Finance, V45, P217 Hudson J, 1996, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V10, P153 Kent Pamela, 2008, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, V48, P649 Dechow P. M., 1996, Contemporary Accounting Research, V13, P1 Joseph K, 2005, SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, V71, P545 MYERS SC, 1984, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, V13, P187 Otchere I, 2003, Accounting and Finance, V43, P211 Xu Z., 2004, Accounting and Finance, V44, P393 Gaunt C, 2004, Accounting & Finance, V44, P27 JEGADEESH N, 1993, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, V48, P65 Core JE, 1999, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, V51, P371 Healy PM, 2001, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICSConference of the Journal of Accounting and Economics, MAY, 2000, ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, V31, P405 Francis J, 2005, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, V39, P295 Officer R. R., 1994, Accounting and Finance, V34, P1 Lillis A. M, 1999, Accounting and Finance, V39, P79 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340696600014 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Identifying emerging topics in science and technology Authors: Small, H; Boyack, KW; Klavans, R Author Full Names: Small, Henry; Boyack, Kevin W.; Klavans, Richard Source: RESEARCH POLICY, 43 (8):1450-1467; 10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005 OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citation-based modeling, Emerging topics, Scientific discovery, Technological innovation, Exogenous events KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH FRONTS; CITATION; NETWORKS; TRENDS; CITESPACE; PATTERNS; MODEL Abstract: The identification of emerging topics is of current interest to decision makers in both government and industry. Although many case studies present retrospective analyses of emerging topics, few studies actually nominate emerging topics for consideration by decision makers. We present a novel approach to identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Two large scale models of the scientific literature, one based on direct citation, and the other based on co-citation, are combined to nominate emerging topics using a difference function that rewards clusters that are new and growing rapidly. The top 25 emergent topics are identified for each year 2007 through 2010. These topics are classified and characterized in various ways in order to understand the motive forces behind their emergence, whether scientific discovery, technological innovation, or exogenous events. Topics are evaluated by searching for recent major awards associated with the topic or its key researchers. The evidence presented suggests that the methodology nominates a viable list of emerging topics suitable for inspection by decision makers. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Small, Henry] SciTech Strategies Inc, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 USA. [Boyack, Kevin W.] SciTech Strategies Inc, Albuquerque, NM 87122 USA. [Klavans, Richard] SciTech Strategies Inc, Berwyn, PA 19312 USA. E-mail Addresses: hsmall at mapofscience.com; kboyack at mapofscience.com; rklavans at mapofscience.com Cited Reference Count: 44 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0048-7333 eISSN: 1873-7625 Web of Science Categories: Management; Planning & Development Research Areas: Business & Economics; Public Administration IDS Number: AN6HW Unique ID: WOS:000340696600014 Cited References: Small Henry, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P595 Hosono H., 2008, Interview in ScienceWatch.com, Boyack Kevin W., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2389 Frickel S, 2005, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V70, P204 Bettencourt Luis M. A., 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P210 Kleinberg J. M., 2002, Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P91 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Chen Chaomei, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P191 Boerner Katy, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P863 Takeda Yoshiyuki, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P23 Hoperoft J., 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, V101, P5249 Ohniwa Ryosuke L., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P111 Goldstein J., 1999, Emergence, V1, P49 Small H, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V50, P799 Cozzens Susan, 2010, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V22, P361 Braun T., 1985, Scientometric Indicators: A 32 Country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact, Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 Alexander J., 2012, 2012 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET)2012 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET), 29 July-2 Aug. 2012, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Novoselov KS, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P666 Guo Hanning, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P421 Boyack K.W., 2014, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Mane KK, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5287 Schiebel Edgar, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P765 Roche Ivana, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 17-20, 2008, Vienna, AUSTRIA, V82, P663 Shibata Naoki, 2008, TECHNOVATION, V28, P758 Borgman C.L., 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries, V7, Corning P.A., 2002, Complexity, V7, SMALL HG, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P139 Chen Chaomei, 2012, EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, V12, P593 Upham S. Phineas, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P15 Waltman Ludo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P2378 Morris SA, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P413 Overbye D., 2013, New York Times, Mitola I. J., 1999, IEEE Personal Commun. Mag., V6, P13 de Haan J., 2006, ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITYConference on Complexity and Ecological Economics, SEP 11-14, 2005, Liverpool, ENGLAND, V3, P293 Boyack Kevin W., 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P670 Shibata N., 2010, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, V78, P274 Tu Yi-Ning, 2012, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V48, P303 Shapira P., 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, V14, Garfield E., 1964, The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science, Katz J.S., 2001, Science Foresight Project Final ReportDSTL/TR01697, VI, Swanson D.R., 1996, KDD-96 Proceedings. Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data MiningProceedings of 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96), 2-4 Aug. 1996, Portland, OR, USA, Small H., 2013, 14th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vienna, Austria, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339532900005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Inequality in societies, academic institutions and science journals: Gini and k-indices Authors: Ghosh, A; Chattopadhyay, N; Chakrabarti, BK Author Full Names: Ghosh, Asim; Chattopadhyay, Nachiketa; Chakrabarti, Bikas K. Source: PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 410 30-34; 10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.026 SEP 15 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Social inequality, Lorenz curves, Inequality indices, Power-laws Abstract: Social inequality is traditionally measured by the Gini-index (g). The g-index takes values from 0 to 1 where g = 0 represents complete equality and g = 1 represents complete inequality. Most of the estimates of the income or wealth data indicate the g value to be widely dispersed across the countries of the world: g values typically range from 0.30 to 0.65 at a particular time (year). We estimated similarly the Gini-index for the citations earned by the yearly publications of various academic institutions and the science journals. The ISI web of science data suggests remarkably strong inequality and universality (g = 0.70 +/- 0.07) across all the universities and institutions of the world, while for the journals we find g = 0.65 +/- 0.15 for any typical year. We define a new inequality measure, namely the k-index, saying that the cumulative income or citations of (1 - k) fraction of people or papers exceed those earned by the fraction (k) of the people or publications respectively. We find, while the k-index value for income ranges from 0.60 to 0.75 for income distributions across the world, it has a value around 0.75 +/- 0.05 for different universities and institutions across the world and around 0.77 +/- 0.10 for the science journals. Apart from above indices, we also analyze the same institution and journal citation data by measuring Pietra index and median index. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Ghosh, Asim; Chakrabarti, Bikas K.] Saha Inst Nucl Phys, Condensed Matter Phys Div, Kolkata 700064, India. [Chattopadhyay, Nachiketa] Indian Stat Inst, Sampling & Official Stat Unit, Kolkata 700108, India. [Chakrabarti, Bikas K.] Indian Stat Inst, Econ Res Unit, Kolkata 700108, India. E-mail Addresses: asimghosh066 at gmail.com; nachiketa at isical.ac.in; bikask.chakrabarti at saha.ac.in Cited Reference Count: 15 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0378-4371 eISSN: 1873-2119 Web of Science Categories: Physics, Multidisciplinary Research Areas: Physics IDS Number: AM0JW Unique ID: WOS:000339532900005 Cited References: Chakrabarti B.K., 2013, P7 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Pareto V., 1897, Cours d'Economie Politique, Eliazar Iddo I., 2010, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V389, P117 BISHOP JA, 1991, ECONOMICA, V58, P461 Aoyama H., 2011, P25 Eliazar Iddo, 2014, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V401, P148 Gini C., 1921, The Economic Journal, V31, P124 Pietra G., 1914, VLXXIV, P775 Yitzhaki S., 2012, The Gini Methodology, Eliazar Iddo I., 2012, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V391, P1323 Coulter P.B., 1989, Eom Young-Ho, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, SHORROCKS AF, 1983, ECONOMICA, V50, P3 Kleiber C., 2003, Statistical size distributions in economics and actuarial sciences, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis Authors: Ding, Y; Zhang, G; Chambers, T; Song, M; Wang, XL; Zhai, CX Author Full Names: Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy; Song, Min; Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1820-1833; 10.1002/asi.23256 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliographic citations, citation analysis KeyWords Plus: CONCEPT SYMBOLS; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; SCIENCE; RETRIEVAL; STATEMENTS; REFERENCES; SOCIOLOGY; RELEVANCE; NETWORKS Abstract: Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery. Addresses: [Ding, Ying; Zhang, Guo; Chambers, Tamy] Indiana Univ, Dept Informat & Lib Sci, Sch Informat & Comp, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA. [Song, Min] Yonsei Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Coll Liberal Arts, Seoul 120749, South Korea. [Wang, Xiaolong; Zhai, Chengxiang] Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Coll Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA. E-mail Addresses: dingying at indiana.edu; guozhang at indiana.edu; tisch at indiana.edu; min.song at yonsei.ac.kr; xwang95 at illinois.edu; czhai at illinois.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2009-361-A00027] Funding Text: Min Song was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2009-361-A00027). Cited Reference Count: 88 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500006 Cited References: Qazvinian V., 2008, COLING '08 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, V1, P689 Dietz L., 2007, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '07, P233 BROOKS TA, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P223 Lipetz B.-A., 1965, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V16, P81 Teufel S., 2006, 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, sigDAIL '09, Proceedings, P80 Ramakrishnan C., 2012, Source Code for Biology and Medicine, V7, P1 Meij E., 2007, RIAO '07 Large Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video, and Sound) Proceedings, P665 Athar A., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Student Session, ACL-HLT, P81 GILBERT GN, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P113 HERLACH G, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P308 Zhang Guo, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P1490 Marsh EE, 2003, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V59, P647 CHUBIN DE, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P423 Small H., 1982, V3, P287 SPIEGELROSING I, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P97 SNIZEK WE, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V20, P25 Siddharthan A., 2007, NAACL HLT 2007 Proceedings, P316 Qazvinian V., 2010, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P555 Garzone M. A., 1997, Automated classification of citations using linguistic semantic grammars, Tang Jie, 2009, ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS13th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge and Data Mining, APR 27-30, 2009, Bangkok, THAILAND, V5476, P572 Borgman C. L., 1990, Scholarly communications and bibliometrics, Teufel S, 2002, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, V28, P409 Hjorland B, 2001, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V35, P249 Chang J., 2009, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), V5, P81 Jenssen TK, 2001, NATURE GENETICS, V28, P21 Dong C., 2011, 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2011, P623 Mons Barend, 2011, NATURE GENETICS, V43, P281 REESPOTTER LK, 1989, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V25, P677 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Nanba H., 1999, Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI '99, P926 Nallapati R. M., 2008, 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '08, P542 White Marilyn Domas, 2006, LIBRARY TRENDS, V55, P22 Abu-Jbara A., 2011, 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P500 He Q., 2010, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, P421 CANO V, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P284 Pham SB, 2003, AI 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DEC 03-05, 2003, PERTH, AUSTRALIA, V2903, P759 Garfield E., 1974, Essays of an information scientist, V2, P1974 FROST CO, 1979, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V49, P399 Ding Y., 2013, PLoS ONE, V8, P1 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 Teufel S., 2000, Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text, Schlitt T, 2003, GENOME RESEARCH, V13, P2568 Mohammad S., 2009, Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings, P584 Stansbury MC, 2002, LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, V24, P157 OCONNOR J, 1982, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V18, P125 Elkiss Aaron, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P51 Liu Y., 2009, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '09, P665 Becher Tony, 1989, Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Arnold Andrew, 2009, WIRELESS ALGORITHMS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS4th International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, AUG 16-18, 2009, Boston, MA, V5682, P541 Glenisson P, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1548 Schneider JW, 2004, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V60, P524 Ding Ying, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P583 Voos H., 1976, Journal of Academic Librarianship, V1, P19 MCCAIN KW, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V17, P127 SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Nanba H., 2004, LREC: 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Small Henry, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P373 Ziman J. M., 1968, Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science, PERITZ BC, 1983, SCIENTOMETRICS, V5, P303 Maricic S, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P530 Schneider Jesper W., 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P573 Fujii A., 2007, Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '07, P793 VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 BONZI S, 1982, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V33, P208 Mei Q., 2008, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) with the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT) of the North American Chapter of the ACL, P816 CRONIN B, 1981, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V37, P16 White MD, 2001, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V37, P721 Qazvinian V., 2008, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, V2, Suppe F, 1998, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, V65, P381 Huang W., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'12, P1910 Kupiec J., 1995, Proceedings of the 18th ACM-SIGIR Conference, P68 Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Hodges T. L., 1972, Citation indexing: Its potential for bibliographical control, Kataria S., 2011, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Volume Three, IJCAI '11, P2274 Nanba H., 2000, Advances in Classification Research Online, V11, P117 Angrosh M. A., 2010, Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL'10, P293 OPPENHEIM C, 1978, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V29, P225 Cronin B., 2005, The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards, Byrnes J. E., 2013, PeerJPrePrints No. e11v1., Cronin B., 1984, The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, He Q., 2011, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '11, P755 MERTON RK, 1957, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V22, P635 Bradshaw S, 2003, RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, AUG 17-22, 2003, TRONDHEIM, NORWAY, V2769, P499 Pettigrew KE, 2001, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V52, P62 Ritchie A., 2006, Workshop on How Can Computational Linguistics Improve Information Retrieval? CLIIR '06 Proceedings, P25 Garfield E., 1964, Statistical association methods for merchanized documentation. Symposium Proceedings Washington 1964, P189 Ritchie A., 2008, 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Proceedings, P213 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500013 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Are all literature citations equally important? Automatic citation strength estimation and its applications Authors: Wan, XJ; Liu, F Author Full Names: Wan, Xiaojun; Liu, Fang Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1929-1938; 10.1002/asi.23083 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: citation analysis KeyWords Plus: COCITATION Abstract: Literature citation analysis plays a very important role in bibliometrics and scientometrics, such as the Science Citation Index (SCI) impact factor, h-index. Existing citation analysis methods assume that all citations in a paper are equally important, and they simply count the number of citations. Here we argue that the citations in a paper are not equally important and some citations are more important than the others. We use a strength value to assess the importance of each citation and propose to use the regression method with a few useful features for automatically estimating the strength value of each citation. Evaluation results on a manually labeled data set in the computer science field show that the estimated values can achieve good correlation with human-labeled values. We further apply the estimated citation strength values for evaluating paper influence and author influence, and the preliminary evaluation results demonstrate the usefulness of the citation strength values. Addresses: [Wan, Xiaojun] Peking Univ, Inst Comp Sci & Technol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. [Wan, Xiaojun] Peking Univ, MOE Key Lab Computat Linguist, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. [Liu, Fang] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Technol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: wanxiaojun at pku.edu.cn; liuf at mail.bnu.edu.cn Funding Acknowledgement: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61170166]; National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA011101] Funding Text: We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We also thank Xiaojiang Huang and Xinjie Zhou for labeling the data and thank YingBo Zhu for developing the labeling tool. The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; grant 61170166) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program; grant 2012AA011101). Cited Reference Count: 36 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500013 Cited References: Jiang X., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P714 Tong T., 2009, System Sciences, 2009. HICSS'09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on, van Eck Nees Jan, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P1653 Radoulov R., 2008, Exploring Automatic Citation Classification, Ritchie A., 2008, Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P213 Qazvinian V., 2008, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, V1, P689 Qazvinian V., 2010, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P555 Abu-Jbara A., 2011, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, V1, P500 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics, Cortez Eli, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH ACM/IEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES7th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JUN 18-23, 2007, Vancouver, CANADA, P215 Radev D. R., 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, P54 Eto Masaki, 2007, LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, P49 Sugiyama K., 2010, Information Retrieval & Knowledge Management (CAMP), 2010 International Conference on, P67 Vapnik V N, 1999, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Egghe L., 1990, Councill Isaac G., 2008, SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, LREC 20086th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), MAY 28-30, 2008, Marrakech, MOROCCO, P661 Abu-Jbara A., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, P80 Piao S., 2007, International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS), P366 Persson Olle, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P415 Mohammad S., 2009, Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, P584 Athar A., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, P597 Chang Chih-Chung, 2011, ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, V2, Dong C., 2011, Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on natural language processing (IJCNLP2011), P623 Page L., 1998, Technical report, He Q., 2010, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, P421 Pham SB, 2003, AI 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DEC 03-05, 2003, PERTH, AUSTRALIA, V2903, P759 Peng F., 2004, Accurate information extraction from research papers using conditional random fields, VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 Aljaber Bader, 2010, INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, V13, P101 Pollman T., 2000, ALWD Citation Manual: A Professional System of Citation, KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Nassiri Isar, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P91 Siddharthan A., 2007, Proceedings of NAACL/HLT-07, P316 Nanba H., 2011, Advances in Classification Research Online, V11, P117 Teufel S., 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, P103 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340460000008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 - 2014) Authors: Chen, CM; Dubin, R; Kim, MC Author Full Names: Chen, Chaomei; Dubin, Rachael; Kim, Meen Chul Source: EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 14 (9):1295-1317; 10.1517/14712598.2014.920813 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: CiteSpace, graphene, regenerative medicine, review, scientometrics, tissue engineering KeyWords Plus: PLURIPOTENT STEM-CELLS; RANDOMIZED PHASE-1 TRIAL; MODIFIED T-CELLS; DEFINED FACTORS; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; SOMATIC-CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; GENERATION Abstract: Introduction: Our previous scientometric review of regenerative medicine provides a snapshot of the fast-growing field up to the end of 2011. The new review identifies emerging trends and new developments appearing in the literature of regenerative medicine based on relevant articles and reviews published between 2000 and the first month of 2014. Areas covered: Multiple datasets of publications relevant to regenerative medicine are constructed through topic search and citation expansion to ensure adequate coverage of the field. Networks of co-cited references representing the literature of regenerative medicine are constructed and visualized based on a combined dataset of 71,393 articles published between 2000 and 2014. Structural and temporal dynamics are identified in terms of most active topical areas and cited references. New developments are identified in terms of newly emerged clusters and research areas. Disciplinary-level patterns are visualized in dual-map overlays. Expert opinion: While research in induced pluripotent stem cells remains the most prominent area in the field of regenerative medicine, research related to clinical and therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine has experienced a considerable growth. In addition, clinical and therapeutic developments in regenerative medicine have demonstrated profound connections with the induced pluripotent stem cell research and stem cell research in general. A rapid adaptation of graphene-based nanomaterials in regenerative medicine is evident. Both basic research represented by stem cell research and application-oriented research typically found in tissue engineering are now increasingly integrated in the scientometric landscape of regenerative medicine. Tissue engineering is an interdisciplinary field in its own right. Advances in multiple disciplines such as stem cell research and graphene research have strengthened the connections between tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Addresses: [Chen, Chaomei; Dubin, Rachael; Kim, Meen Chul] Drexel Univ, Coll Comp & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. E-mail Addresses: chaomei.chen at drexel.edu Cited Reference Count: 86 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INFORMA HEALTHCARE, TELEPHONE HOUSE, 69-77 PAUL STREET, LONDON EC2A 4LQ, ENGLAND ISSN: 1471-2598 eISSN: 1744-7682 Web of Science Categories: Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Medicine, Research & Experimental Research Areas: Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Research & Experimental Medicine IDS Number: AN3BN Unique ID: WOS:000340460000008 Cited References: Hare Joshua M., 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, V54, P2277 Anokye-Danso Frederick, 2011, CELL STEM CELL, V8, P376 Lowry William E., 2010, JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, V123, P643 Chen Chaomei, 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P334 Brentjens Renier J., 2011, BLOOD, V118, P4817 Anastasia L., 2010, CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, V17, P1230 Burdick Jason A., 2011, ADVANCED MATERIALS, V23, PH41 Takahashi Kazutoshi, 2006, CELL, V126, P663 Zacharias David G., 2011, MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, V86, P634 Dotti Gianpietro, 2014, IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, V257, P107 Macchiarini Paolo, 2008, LANCET, V372, P2023 Kim Deok-Ho, 2010, ADVANCED MATERIALS, V22, P4551 Ieda Masaki, 2010, CELL, V142, P375 Savoldo Barbara, 2011, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, V121, P1822 Chen Fa-Ming, 2012, BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, V30, P658 Levi Benjamin, 2011, STEM CELLS, V29, P576 EVANS MJ, 1981, NATURE, V292, P154 Elloumi-Hannachi I., 2010, JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V267, P54 Kiskinis Evangelos, 2010, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, V120, P51 Stasi A. D., 2011, N. Engl. J. Med., V365, P1673 Stadtfeld Matthias, 2010, GENES & DEVELOPMENT, V24, P2239 Jain RK, 2005, SCIENCE, V307, P58 Kelm Jens M., 2010, ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, V62, P753 Chen Chaomei, 2012, EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, V12, P593 Gore Athurva, 2011, NATURE, V471, P63 Shi Yan, 2008, CELL STEM CELL, V2, P525 Pittenger MF, 1999, SCIENCE, V284, P143 Campbell KHS, 1996, NATURE, V380, P64 Egami Mime, 2014, ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH, V37, P96 Cobo M. J., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1382 Watt Fiona M., 2010, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V365, P155 Williams Adam R., 2011, CIRCULATION RESEARCH, V109, P923 Hong Hyenjong, 2009, NATURE, V460, P1132 Crapo Peter M., 2011, BIOMATERIALS, V32, P3233 Okita Keisuke, 2013, STEM CELLS, V31, P458 Liu Shao Qiong, 2010, SOFT MATTER, V6, P67 Itzhaki Ilanit, 2011, NATURE, V471, P225 Takahashi Kazutoshi, 2007, CELL, V131, P861 Vierbuchen Thomas, 2010, NATURE, V463, P1035 Jensen Michael C., 2014, IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, V257, P127 Lu Jiayu, 2013, ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, V23, P3494 Zhao Tongbiao, 2011, NATURE, V474, P212 Bolli Roberto, 2011, LANCET, V378, P1847 Ralston Amy, 2010, REPRODUCTION, V139, P35 Jiang YH, 2002, NATURE, V418, P41 Slaughter Brandon V., 2009, ADVANCED MATERIALS, V21, P3307 Hanahan Douglas, 2011, CELL, V144, P646 Rosvall M, 2010, PLoS One, Pe8694 Obokata Haruko, 2014, NATURE, V505, P641 Chen Fa-Ming, 2010, BIOMATERIALS, V31, P6279 Chen G. -Y., 2012, BIOMATERIALS, V33, P418 Turtle Cameron J., 2012, CURRENT OPINION IN IMMUNOLOGY, V24, P633 Chen Chaomei, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P431 Chang David F., 2009, STEM CELLS, V27, P812 Xu Yuxi, 2010, ACS NANO, V4, P4324 Dvir Tal, 2011, NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, V6, P13 Makkar Raj R., 2012, LANCET, V379, P895 Roach P., 2010, SURFACE SCIENCE REPORTS, V65, P145 Patterson Jennifer, 2010, MATERIALS TODAY, V13, P14 Karussis Dimitrios, 2010, ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, V67, P1187 Itoga Kazuyoshi, 2010, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, V20, P8768 Uygun Basak E., 2010, NATURE MEDICINE, V16, P814 Chen Chaomei, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1386 Cherry Anne B. C., 2012, CELL, V148, P1110 Porter David L., 2011, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V365, P725 Schnerch Angelique, 2010, STEM CELLS, V28, P419 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 Lee Kangwon, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, V8, P153 Kim K., 2010, NATURE, V467, P285 Woltjen Knut, 2009, NATURE, V458, P766 Ruella Marco, 2014, IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, V257, P14 Ott Harald C., 2008, NATURE MEDICINE, V14, P213 Tormin Ariane, 2011, BLOOD, V117, P5067 Sommer Cesar A., 2010, STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY, V1, Hanley Joanna, 2010, BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, V151, P16 GURDON JB, 1962, JOURNAL OF EMBRYOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL MORPHOLOGY, V10, P622 Lister Ryan, 2011, NATURE, V471, P68 Teo Benjamin Kim Kiat, 2010, NUCLEAR MECHANICS AND GENOME REGULATION, V98, P241 Badylak Stephen F., 2009, ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, V5, P1 Reya T, 2001, NATURE, V414, P105 Warren Luigi, 2010, CELL STEM CELL, V7, P618 Polo JM, 2010, Nat Biotechnol, V28, P845 Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 Hoppe Alexander, 2011, BIOMATERIALS, V32, P2757 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Dash M., 2011, PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE, V36, P981 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340479500012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation Authors: Huang, MH; Huang, WT; Chang, CC; Chen, DZ; Lin, CP Author Full Names: Huang, Mu-Hsuan; Huang, Wei-Tzu; Chang, Cheng-Ching; Chen, Dar-Zen; Lin, Chang-Pin Source: JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 65 (9):1917-1928; 10.1002/asi.23092 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliometric scatter KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY; DISTRIBUTIONS; INDICATORS; SCIENCE; INFORMATION; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT Abstract: Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone. Addresses: [Huang, Mu-Hsuan; Huang, Wei-Tzu; Chang, Cheng-Ching] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Taipei 10764, Taiwan. [Chen, Dar-Zen] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan. [Chen, Dar-Zen] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Ind Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan. [Lin, Chang-Pin] Natl Taiwan Ocean Univ, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, Keelung, Taiwan. E-mail Addresses: mhhuang at ntu.edu.tw; wthuang at umich.edu; findweber at gmail.com; dzchen at ntu.edu.tw; b0195 at mail.ntou.edu.tw Cited Reference Count: 82 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 2330-1635 eISSN: 2330-1643 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN3IC Unique ID: WOS:000340479500012 Cited References: Schultz Laura I., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P155 Faba-Perez C, 2003, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V59, P558 Bradford S. C., 1934, Engineering, V137, P86 GLANZEL W, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P211 COLLINS P, 1988, RESEARCH POLICY, V17, P65 Sampat B. N., 2005, P277 Vickery B. C., 1948, Journal of Documentation, V4, P199 Janczura J., 2012, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, V205, P79 Chang Y. W., 2012, Journal of Library and Information Studies, V10, P1 Gordon Avishag, 2010, Critical Studies on Terrorism, V3, P437 Ashton B., 1988, Research Technology Management, V31, P42 Looy B. V., 2003, Scientometrics, V57, P335 Breitzman AF, 2002, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V28, P187 PTMT, 2013, Patent counts by class by year, Lichtenberg F., 2002, Technology and Industry Working Papers, HUBERT JJ, 1977, SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, V4, P441 Pouris A., 2005, Science and Public Policy, V32, P221 Hall B. H., 2000, Economic working paper E00-277, LEIMKUHL.FF, 1967, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V23, P197 Heine MH, 1998, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V54, P303 Van Raan A, 1999, Scientometrics, V45, P419 Kayal AA, 1999, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V46, P127 Deng Guang-Feng, 2012, EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, V39, P6229 Chan LKC, 2001, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, V56, P2431 Banerjee P, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P95 MacRoberts MH, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P435 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P457 Bookstein A., 1993, Scientometrics, V30, P353 Barrios Maite, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P453 Choung JY, 1998, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V45, P357 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 Leimu R, 2005, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V20, P28 Thomas P., 2001, Engineering Management, V13, P9 Den Z., 1999, Financial Analysts Journal, V55, P20 Ohniwa RL, 2004, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V13, P175 BRAAM RR, 1991, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V42, P233 POPE A, 1975, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V26, P207 Katz JS, 1999, JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, V17, P467 Haupt Reinhard, 2007, RESEARCH POLICY, V36, P387 Gay C., 2005, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, V14, P333 BROOKS TA, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P183 World Intellectual Property Organization, 2011, 2011 World intellectual property indicators, EGGHE L, 1987, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V38, P288 NARIN F, 1994, SCIENTOMETRICS4th International Conference on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, in Memory of Derek John de Solla Price (1922-1983), SEP 11-15, 1993, BERLIN, GERMANY, V30, P147 Mairesse J., 1984, R&D, Patents and Productivity, BASU A, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE3RD INTERNATIONAL CONF ON INFORMETRICS : ON THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF BRADFORDS LAW, AUG, 1991, BANGALORE, INDIA, V43, P494 Tamada Schumpeter, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V68, P289 WILSON P, 1995, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V46, P45 SEGLEN PO, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P628 Regolini A., 2012, Library Management, V34, P31 Bensman S. J., 1982, Library Research, V4, P279 Huang M-H., 2011, Journal of Library and Information Studies, V9, P1 Thomas Patrick, 2006, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V15, P145 Meyer M, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V49, P93 Rao IKR, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V41, P93 Vinkler Peter, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V35, P602 Fischer MM, 2003, ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, V37, P303 Hall B. H., 2004, NBER working paper 10901, GRILICHES Z, 1990, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V28, P1661 Gambardella A., 2008, CEPR Discussion Papers No. DP6848, VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 Garfield E., 1984, Essays of an Information Scientist, V7, P536 Mishra Paras N., 2010, MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, V15, P91 Stolpe M, 2002, RESEARCH POLICY, V31, P1181 CHEN YS, 1995, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V46, P370 COLEMAN SR, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICS, V27, P75 van Leeuwen TN, 1999, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V25, P489 Yoon B, 2005, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V72, P145 Cronin B, 1984, The citation process, Hall B. H., 2001, NBER working paper 8494, Weinstock N., 1971, Encyclopedia of library and information science, P16 Atallah Gamal, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P437 Weinstein R., 1999, The Licensing Journal, V19, P8 Jena Kamal Lochan, 2012, ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, V30, P103 Lanjouw JO, 2004, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, V114, P441 Garg K. C., 1992, Scientometrics, V27, P253 Garfield E., 1964, Essay of Information Scientist, V1, P84 BROOKES BC, 1973, LIBRARY TRENDS, V22, P18 Criscuolo Paola, 2008, RESEARCH POLICY, V37, P1892 Jaffe A. B., 1992, NBER working paper 3993, Bessen James, 2008, RESEARCH POLICY, V37, P932 GROOS OV, 1967, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V18, P46 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569800007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A patent analysis method to trace technology evolutionary pathways Authors: Zhou, X; Zhang, Y; Porter, AL; Guo, Y; Zhu, DH Author Full Names: Zhou, Xiao; Zhang, Yi; Porter, Alan L.; Guo, Ying; Zhu, Donghua Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (3):705-721; 10.1007/s11192-014-1317-4 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Patent analysis, Technology evaluation, Market shift, Dye-sensitized, solar cells (DSSCs) KeyWords Plus: SENSITIZED SOLAR-CELLS; 3RD-GENERATION PHOTOVOLTAICS; LOW-COST; EFFICIENCY; CYCLE; MODEL Abstract: Increased competition due to rapid technological development pushes all participants in the market to focus on the prospect of New and Emerging Science & Technologies (NESTs). One promising NEST, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), has attracted attention in recent years. We focus on three research questions: how can we estimate DSSCs research activity trends; how can we identify DSSCs market expansion patterns; and, seeking to identify potential subsystems, what are the likely evolutionary paths of DSSCs development? In this paper, patent analysis is applied to help determine the developmental stage of a particular technology and trace its potential evolutionary pathways. In addition, since patent information can reflect commercial degree, we use patent transfer patterns to help evaluate market shift prospects. Addresses: [Zhou, Xiao; Zhang, Yi; Guo, Ying; Zhu, Donghua] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China. [Porter, Alan L.] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA. E-mail Addresses: belinda1214 at 126.com Funding Acknowledgement: US National Science Foundation [1064146]; "Center for Nanotechnology in Society" project centered at Arizona State University [0937591] Funding Text: We acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation (Award #1064146-"Revealing Innovation Pathways: Hybrid Science Maps for Technology Assessment and Foresight" to Georgia Tech) and also from the "Center for Nanotechnology in Society" project centered at Arizona State University (Award #0937591). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Cited Reference Count: 23 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN4PJ Unique ID: WOS:000340569800007 Cited References: Guo Ying, 2012, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V24, P843 Guo Y., 2010, R&D Management, V40, P196 Winebrake J. J., 2003, Alternate energy: Assessment and implementation reference book, Chang Pao-Long, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P5 Aratani F, 2005, PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, V13, P463 Boyack Kevin W., 2012, PICMET '12: PROCEEDINGS - TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIESConference of PICMET - Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), JUL 29-AUG 02, 2012, Vancouver, CANADA, P2605 Robinson Douglas K. R., 2013, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V80, P267 Boyack Kevin W., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, V79, P45 Daim Tugrul U., 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V73, P981 OREGAN B, 1991, NATURE, V353, P737 Kajikawa Y., 2008, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, V76, P1132 Graetzel Michael, 2009, ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, V42, P1788 Zhang Y., 2013, 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) Conference Proceedings, Vienna, Ma Tingting, 2014, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V26, P87 Guo Ying, 2012, R & D MANAGEMENT, V42, P133 VERNON R, 1966, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V80, P190 Conibeer Gavin, 2007, MATERIALS TODAY, V10, P42 MILLER D, 1984, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V30, P1161 SMALL H, 1974, SCIENCE STUDIES, V4, P17 Green MA, 2001, PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, V9, P123 Zheng Jia, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P175 Jose Rajan, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, V92, P289 Yoon Janghyeok, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P445 ======================================================================== . *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340951200001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Applications and researches of geographic information system technologies in bibliometrics Authors: Wang, XM; Ma, MG; Li, X; Zhang, ZQ Author Full Names: Wang Xuemei; Ma Mingguo; Li Xin; Zhang Zhiqiang Source: EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 7 (3):147-152; 10.1007/s12145-013-0132-4 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: Bibliometrics, Geographic information system (GIS), Spatial visualization, Spatial analysis KeyWords Plus: H-INDEX; SCIENCE; EXCELLENCE; LIBRARY; REGIONS; CITIES; MAPS; GIS Abstract: Although the research and application of a geographic information system (GIS) in bibliometrics remains in its initial stage, several valuable attempts have been made in recent years. This paper provides our overview regarding this area. We first reviewed the spatial information mining derived from literature, including structured and unstructured data. The spatial display and the basic spatial operations for the geographic information derived from literature were then introduced, demonstrating that GIS can be directly used to construct digital libraries. Some literature database websites have begun to utilize WEBGIS to display the spatial distribution of an author's location. Additionally, the spatial distribution information can be displayed in various modes with other specialized tools. Potential spatial analyses in bibliometrics were then discussed, introducing geostatistical and buffer analyses as case studies. Finally, several bibliometric indicators attached with research units were investigated. When the quantitative research index units are linked with the research spatial position, they can be displayed, queried and retrieved spatially. Future work to advance the application and research of GIS in bibliometrics is still warranted. Addresses: [Wang Xuemei; Ma Mingguo; Li Xin] Chinese Acad Sci, Cold & Arid Reg Environm & Engn Res Inst, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China. [Wang Xuemei; Zhang Zhiqiang] Chinese Acad Sci, Sci Informat Ctr Resources & Environm, Natl Sci Lib, Lanzhou Branch, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: mmg at lzb.ac.cn Funding Acknowledgement: National Natural Science Foundation of China [40701133]; Chinese Academy of Sciences Funding Text: Under the Special Project of Literature Ability of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.: 40701133). Cited Reference Count: 45 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY ISSN: 1865-0473 eISSN: 1865-0481 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary Research Areas: Computer Science; Geology IDS Number: AN9TH Unique ID: WOS:000340951200001 Cited References: Schreiber Michael, 2008, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V2, P211 Ma D, 2009, Proceedings of International Symposium on Spatial Analysis, Spatial-Temporal Data Modeling, and Data Mining (ISSA 2009), Wuhan, P1 Frenken Koen, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P222 Ancona D, 2002, VISUAL INTERFACES TO DIGITAL LIBRARIES2nd International Workshop on Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries held at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), JUL 18, 2002, PORTLAND, OREGON, V2539, P199 WOODRUFF AG, 1994, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V45, P645 Chen Chaomei, 2008, DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, V67, P234 PRITCHAR.A, 1969, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V25, P348 Liu L, 2008, J Inf, V1, P133 ???, 2011, ????Chinese Science Bulletin, V56, P3115 Hengl Tomislav, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P491 Zhao Rongying, 2010, Journal of Library Science in China, V36, P60 Barbara LH, 2010, The Undiscover'd Country, Barbara PB, 1998, Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst, V25, P161 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P537 Bornmann Lutz, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P333 Wu Jiang, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P181 French M, 1999, The ARL GIS literacy project: support for government data services in the digital library, Vanclay Jerome K., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P211 WANG XZ, 2009, STUD FUZZINESS SOFT, V245, P1 Hassan Saeed-Ul, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P163 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Garfield E, 1998, UNFALLCHIRURG, V101, P413 Leydesdorff Loet, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1622 Vinkler P., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P861 Ahlgren Per, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P771 Cai G, 2002, Proceedings of Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, Portland, P171 Bellis DN, 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the Science citation index to cybermetrics, P417 Allen RS, 2001, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIES, V21, P191 Bornmann Lutz, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P336 van Eck Nees Jan, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523 Bensalem I., 2010, Journal of Computer Sciences, V6, Allison W, 1994, J Am Soc Inf Sci, V45, P645 Bornmann Lutz, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P830 Carvalho R, 2006, J Stat Mech: Theor Exp, V2006, Glanzel W, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 17, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V53, P171 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P547 Pouliquen B, 2006, Proceedings of LREC-2006, P53 ???, 2012, ??????Advance in Earth Sciences, V27, P1288 Boerner Katy, 2011, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, V54, P60 Olechnicka A, 2010, Collnet J Scientometrics Inf Manag, V4, P21 Leydesdorff Loet, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1442 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1954 Leidner JL, 2007, Toponym resolution in text: annotation, evaluation and applications of spatial grounding of place names, P289 Smith TR, 1996, COMPUTER, V29, P54 Bishop Bradley Wade, 2010, LIBRARY HI TECH, V28, P536 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340453300010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Do AAO-HNSF CORE Grants Predict Future NIH Funding Success? Authors: Eloy, JA; Svider, PF; Kanumuri, VV; Folbe, AJ; Setzen, M; Baredes, S Author Full Names: Eloy, Jean Anderson; Svider, Peter F.; Kanumuri, Vivek V.; Folbe, Adam J.; Setzen, Michael; Baredes, Soly Source: OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 151 (2):246-252; 10.1177/0194599814533647 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: scholarly productivity, scholarly impact, research output, research productivity, academic promotion, academic advancement, academic appointment, National Institutes of Health funding, AAO-HNSF CORE grants, CORE KeyWords Plus: EXPERT WITNESS QUALIFICATION; CAREER-DEVELOPMENT RESOURCE; H-INDEX; SCHOLARLY IMPACT; MALPRACTICE LITIGATION; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; ACADEMIC OTOLARYNGOLOGY; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY; GENDER DISPARITIES Abstract: Objective. To determine (1) whether academic otolaryngologists who have received an American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE) grant are more likely to procure future National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding; (2) whether CORE grants or NIH Career Development (K) awards have a stronger association with scholarly impact. Study Design and Setting. Historical cohort. Methods. Scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, publication experience, and prior grant history, were determined for CORE-funded and non-CORE-funded academic otolaryngologists. All individuals were assessed for NIH funding history. Results. Of 192 academic otolaryngologists with a CORE funding history, 39.6% had active or prior NIH awards versus 15.1% of 1002 non-CORE-funded faculty (P < .0001). Higher proportions of CORE-funded otolaryngologists have received K-series and R-series grants from the NIH (P-values < .05). K-grant recipients had higher h-indices than CORE recipients (12.6 vs 7.1, P < .01). Upon controlling for rank and experience, this difference remained significant among junior faculty. Conclusions. A higher proportion of academic otolaryngologists with prior AAO-HNSF CORE funding have received NIH funding relative to their non-CORE-funded peers, suggesting that the CORE program may be successful in its stated goals of preparing individuals for the NIH peer review process, although further prospective study is needed to evaluate a "cause and effect" relationship. Individuals with current or prior NIH K-grants had greater research productivity than those with CORE funding history. Both cohorts had higher scholarly impact values than previously published figures among academic otolaryngologists, highlighting that both CORE grants and NIH K-grants awards are effective career development resources. Addresses: [Eloy, Jean Anderson; Kanumuri, Vivek V.; Baredes, Soly] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA. [Eloy, Jean Anderson] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA. [Eloy, Jean Anderson; Baredes, Soly] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA. [Svider, Peter F.; Folbe, Adam J.] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Detroit, MI USA. [Setzen, Michael] N Shore Univ Hosp, Rhinol Sect, Manhasset, NY USA. [Setzen, Michael] NYU, Dept Otolaryngol, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA. E-mail Addresses: jean.anderson.eloy at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 53 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND ISSN: 0194-5998 eISSN: 1097-6817 Web of Science Categories: Otorhinolaryngology; Surgery Research Areas: Otorhinolaryngology; Surgery IDS Number: AN2YZ Unique ID: WOS:000340453300010 Cited References: Holden G, 2005, SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, V41, P67 Kasabwala K, 2013, J Surg Educ, Pagel P. S., 2011, ANAESTHESIA, V66, P873 Jacob Brian A., 2011, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICSConference on the Role of Firms in Tax Systems, APR 17-18, 2009, Ann Arbor, MI, V95, P1168 Pashkova A. A., 2013, ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, V57, P1058 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V148, P215 Agarwal Nitin, 2013, World neurosurgery, V80, P738 Hirsch J. E., 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P19193 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P118 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2014, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V150, P371 Pagel P. S., 2011, ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, V55, P1085 Quigley Matthew R., 2012, JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, V27, P463 Sunaryo Peter L., 2014, UROLOGY, V83, P704 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2012, LARYNGOSCOPE, V122, P2690 Svider Peter F., 2014, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V120, P191 Rezek Issa, 2011, ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, V18, P1337 Colaco Marc, 2013, JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, V190, P999 Jeang Kuan-Teh, 2008, RETROVIROLOGY, V5, Svider Peter F., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, V27, PE131 Purvis Andy, 2006, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V21, P422 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2014, INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, V4, P85 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P1865 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2014, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V150, P53 Poynard Thierry, 2011, CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, V35, P375 Svider Peter F., 2014, INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, V4, P138 Pagel P. S., 2011, BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, V107, P357 Lee Janet, 2009, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V111, P387 Folbe Adam J., 2014, LARYNGOSCOPE, V124, P1301 Sharma Bharat, 2013, SURGERY, V153, P493 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V149, P77 Hauptman Jason S., 2011, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V115, P1262 Svider Peter F., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, V34, P464 Garrison HH, NIH research funding trends: FY1995-2013, CARR P, 1992, JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, V7, P418 Castillo M., 2010, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, V31, P783 Kelly Clint D., 2007, NATURE, V449, P403 Pagel Paul S., 2011, JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, V25, P761 Sanfey Hilary, 2010, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, V200, P554 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V148, P764 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P884 Benway Brian M., 2009, UROLOGY, V74, P30 Svider Peter F., 2014, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V121, P423 Atasoylu AA, 2003, JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE22nd Annual Meeting of the Society-of-General-Internal-Medicine, APR 29-MAY 01, 1999, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, V18, P711 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P103 Sanfey Hilary, 2012, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, V204, P130 Gaster Natascha, 2012, BIOESSAYS, V34, P830 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2014, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V120, P185 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V149, P649 Tomei Krystal L., 2014, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, V21, P1102 Engqvist Leif, 2008, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V23, P250 Rad Arash Ehteshami, 2010, ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, V17, P817 Dixon A. K., 2009, SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, V50, P847 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339952300002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Awards before and after the Nobel Prize: A Matthew effect and/or a ticket to one's own funeral? Authors: Chan, HF; Gleeson, L; Torgler, B Author Full Names: Chan, Ho Fai; Gleeson, Laura; Torgler, Benno Source: RESEARCH EVALUATION, 23 (3):210-220; 10.1093/reseval/rvu011 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Nobel Prize, Nobel laureates, Matthew effect, awards, recognition KeyWords Plus: SQUARE-ROOT LAW; SCIENTIFIC PERFORMANCE; CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE; SCIENCE; AGE; PRODUCTIVITY Abstract: The primary aim of this descriptive exploration of scientists' life cycle award patterns is to evaluate whether awards breed further awards and identify researcher experiences after reception of the Nobel Prize. To achieve this goal, we collected data on the number of awards received each year for 50 years before and after Nobel Prize reception by all 1901-2000 Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry, and medicine or physiology. Our results indicate an increasing rate of awards before Nobel reception, reaching the summit precisely in the year of the Nobel Prize. After this pinnacle year, awards drop sharply. This result is confirmed by separate analyses of three different disciplines and by a random-effects negative binomial regression model. Such an effect, however, does not emerge for more recent Nobel laureates (1971-2000). In addition, Nobelists in medicine or physiology generate more awards shortly before and after prize reception, whereas laureates in chemistry attract more awards as time progresses. Addresses: [Chan, Ho Fai; Gleeson, Laura; Torgler, Benno] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Finance, Queensland Behav Econ Grp QuBE, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. [Torgler, Benno] EBS Univ Wirtschaft & Recht, EBS Business Sch, Oestrich Winkel, Germany. [Torgler, Benno] CREMA, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: benno.torgler at qut.edu.au Cited Reference Count: 56 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND ISSN: 0958-2029 eISSN: 1471-5449 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AM6DL Unique ID: WOS:000339952300002 Cited References: Olry Regis, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF THE NEUROSCIENCES, V21, P115 Simonton D. K., 1992, Genius & Eminence, P77 STANOVICH KE, 1986, READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, V21, P360 GLANZEL W, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P211 GOLDSTONE JA, 1979, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V9, P385 Bonitz M, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V40, P407 Jones Benjamin F., 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V108, P18910 Meyers Jeffrey, 2007, ANTIOCH REVIEW, V65, P214 Van Looy B, 2004, RESEARCH POLICY, V33, P425 Chan H. F., 2013, V2013-02, Watson J., 2007, Avoid Boring People: Lessons from the Life of a Scientist, Stephan P., 2012, How Economics Shapes Science, Schettino Francesco, 2013, JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, V35, P1043 Frey Bruno S., 2006, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V1, P377 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 STEPHAN PE, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICS, V28, P387 Frey B. S., 2010, Nature, V465, P871 Bothner Matthew S., 2010, JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, V34, P80 ALLISON PD, 1974, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V39, P596 Azoulay Pierre, 2014, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V60, P92 ADAMS C W, 1946, Isis; an international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences, V36, P166 ZUCKERMAN H, 1992, THEORETICAL MEDICINE, V13, P217 Samuelson P. A., 2004, Lives of the Laureates: Eighteen Nobel Economists, P49 Jones Benjamin F., 2010, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V92, P1 Frey B. S., 2014, Awards are a Special Kind of Signal, V2014-04, Merton R. K., 1973, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, SIMONTON DK, 1988, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V104, P251 Simonton D. K., 1988, Scientific genius: A psychology of science, WALBERG HJ, 1983, AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, V20, P359 NICHOLLS PT, 1988, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V24, P469 Zuckerman H., 1996, Scientific Elites: Nobel Laureates in the United States, Medoff M. H., 2006, Journal of Economic Methodology, V13, P485 Jones Benjamin F., 2009, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, V76, P283 Tol Richard S. J., 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P420 COLE S, 1970, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V76, P286 COLE S, 1979, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V84, P958 Stadelmann David, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Chan Ho Fai, 2013, NATURE, V500, P29 Frank R. H., 1996, The Winner-Take-All Society, LEVIN SG, 1991, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V81, P114 Simon H. A., 1996, Models of My Life, Klahr D., 2004, Models of a Man. Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon, P433 Lehman H. C., 1953, Age and Achievement, Bothner Matthew S., 2011, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V57, P439 Merton RK, 1995, SOCIAL FORCES, V74, P379 ROSSITER MW, 1993, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V23, P325 Strevens Michael, 2006, STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, V37, P159 HUNT JG, 1987, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V13, P191 Frey Bruno S., 2009, ECONOMICS OF ETHICS AND THE ETHICS OF ECONOMICS: VALUES, MARKETS AND THE STATE, P73 Torgler B, 2013, CENTURY OF AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW: INSIGHTS ON CRITICAL FACTORS IN JOURNAL PUBLISHING, P1 MERTON RK, 1988, ISIS, V79, P606 ALLISON PD, 1982, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V47, P615 Wang Jian, 2014, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V8, P329 Petersen Alexander M., 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V109, P5213 Kurian G. T., 2002, The Nobel Scientists: A Biographical Encyclopedia, SEGLEN PO, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P628 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339873900009 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Bibliometric analysis of research on secondary organic aerosols: Update Authors: Li, JF; Zhang, YH; Herjavic, G; Wine, PH; Klasinc, L Author Full Names: Li, Jinfeng; Zhang, Yuanhang; Herjavic, Glenda; Wine, Paul H.; Klasinc, Leo Source: PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 86 (7):1169-1175; 10.1515/pac-2014-0204 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliometrics, carbon compounds, environmental chemistry, IUPAC Congress-44, oxidation, photodegradation, research trends, secondary organic aerosol, word cluster analysis KeyWords Plus: PEARL RIVER DELTA; IDENTIFICATION; ISOPRENE; INDEX; CHINA Abstract: This study was conceived to evaluate the global scientific output of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) research and to assess the characteristics of the research patterns, tendencies, and methods in the papers. Data were based on the online version of Science Citation Index Expanded from 1990 to 2013. Publications referring to SOA were assessed by distribution of the number of publications and times cited, source journals, h-index, and the most cited publications in these years. By synthetic analysis of author keywords, KeyWords Plus, titles, and abstracts, it was concluded that modeling is currently and will at least over the next decade continue to be the predominant research method to validate state-of-the-art knowledge of SOA, and that the foci of SOA research will be the key precursors terpenes, isoprene, and dicarbonyls; the mechanisms of oxidation and aqueous-phase reactions; emission inventories; and chemical composition. Recent years show growing interest for research on health effects. Addresses: [Herjavic, Glenda; Klasinc, Leo] Rudjer Boskovic Inst, Zagreb, Croatia. [Li, Jinfeng; Zhang, Yuanhang] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. [Li, Jinfeng] China Inst Atom Energy, Dept Radiat Safety, Beijing, Peoples R China. [Wine, Paul H.] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biochem, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA. [Wine, Paul H.] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA. E-mail Addresses: klasinc at irb.hr Funding Acknowledgement: Chemistry and the Environment Division of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry [2012-028-2-600] Funding Text: This study was supported by the Chemistry and the Environment Division of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (No. 2012-028-2-600). Discussions with Dr. Weiwei Hu, Dr. Song Guo, Dr. Yunpeng Li and Prof. Yuh-shan Ho are gratefully acknowledged. Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH, GENTHINER STRASSE 13, D-10785 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 0033-4545 eISSN: 1365-3075 Web of Science Categories: Chemistry, Multidisciplinary Research Areas: Chemistry IDS Number: AM5CS Unique ID: WOS:000339873900009 Cited References: Lin Ying-Hsuan, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V110, P6718 Kanakidou M, 2005, ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, V5, P1053 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Grosjean D., 1976, Abstracts Papers of the American Chemical Society, V1, P2 Baltensperger Urs, 2008, JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, V21, P145 Wang Siyuan, 2013, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, V118, P507 ROGGE WF, 1993, ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS4TH INTERNATIONAL CONF ON CARBONACEOUS PARTICLES IN THE ATMOSPHERE, APR 03-05, 1991, VIENNA, AUSTRIA, V27, P1309 TURPIN BJ, 1995, ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, V29, P3527 von Stackelberg Katherine, 2013, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, V12, Solomon Paul A., 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, V58, PS3 Li Jinfeng, 2013, PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, V85, P1241 Hallquist M., 2009, ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, V9, P5155 Li Nan, 2013, ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, V76, P200 Kalberer M, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P1659 Jiang Fei, 2012, JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, V43, P57 Pernigotti D., 2013, AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, V6, P701 PANDIS SN, 1992, ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, V26, P2269 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340210900004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Preliminary Study of the Relationship between the h-Index and Excess Citations Authors: Yuan, XY; Hua, WN; Rousseau, R; Ye, FY Author Full Names: Yuan, Xiaoyuan; Hua, Weina; Rousseau, Ronald; Ye, Fred Y. Source: CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, 38 (2):127-144; JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: h-index, h-core, excess citations KeyWords Plus: HIRSCH-INDEX; LOTKAIAN INFORMETRICS; IMPACT FACTOR; TAIL; DISTRIBUTIONS; COUNTRIES; SCALES; MODEL; CORE Abstract: This article presents a study of the average number of excess citations of papers in the h-core, denoted as e(2)/h and the ratio between the e-area and the h-area, denoted as e(2)/h(2). Real-world citation data from different countries are studied. It is found that at the country level, a small set of publications generate a disproportionately large amount of citations. Although different countries have different e(2)/h(2) values in different fields, average e(2)/h(2) values are all above 1. The e(2)/h values vary widely between fields, reflecting the general citation density in these fields. For cumulative data e(2)/h(2) and e(2)/h values each converge quickly. Neither a shifted Zipf nor an exponential model could fit the data. Addresses: [Yuan, Xiaoyuan] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Lib Nanjing Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. [Hua, Weina; Ye, Fred Y.] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. [Rousseau, Ronald] Univ Antwerp, IBW, Inst Educ & Informat Sci, Antwerp, Belgium. [Rousseau, Ronald] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Math, Leuven, Belgium. E-mail Addresses: yuanxy at nju.edu.cn; huawn at nju.edu.cn; ronald.rousseau at uantwerpen.be; yye at nju.edu.cn Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CANADIAN ASSOC INFORMATION SCIENCE, PO BOX 6174, STATION J, OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2A 1T2, CANADA ISSN: 1195-096X Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AM9OM Unique ID: WOS:000340210900004 Cited References: Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Rousseau R., 2006, Science Focus, V1, P23 Egghe Leo, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1637 Ye Fred Y., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P431 SCImago, 2007, SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Egghe Leo, 2010, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V44, P65 Alonso S., 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P273 Egghe Leo, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P295 Csajbok Edit, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V73, P91 Ye Fred Y., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1208 Egghe Leo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1048 Burrell Quentin L., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P774 Burrell Quentin L., 2008, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V44, P1794 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Liu Joan Q., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P190 Hobbs Richard, 2009, RESTORATION ECOLOGY, V17, P1 Albarran Pedro, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P40 Liu Yuxian, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P59 Rousseau R., 2013, Modelling Some Structural Indicators in an h-Index Context: A Shifted Zipf and a Decreasing Exponential Model, Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P121 Burrell Quentin L., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P1504 Fanelli Daniele, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P891 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P697 Zhang C. T., 2013, Scientific Reports, V3, P1 Ye Fred Y., 2008, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V2, P288 Liu Yuxian, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P235 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P187 Laherrere J, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V2, P525 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Chen Dar-zen, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P129 Liang Liming, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 112th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 14-17, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, V1, P143 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P625 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339552300002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Eleven mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation Authors: Zaggl, MA Author Full Names: Zaggl, Michael A. Source: JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 10 (2):197-230; 10.1017/S1744137413000374 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: NAKED MOLE-RAT; INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; GROUP SELECTION; COCITATION ANALYSIS; COSTLY PUNISHMENT; SOCIAL NORMS; STRUCTURED POPULATIONS; ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT; GENETICAL EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS Abstract: Cooperation is one of the basic elements of social life. It is essential for emergent social phenomena, such as the formation of families, groups, and societies. However, evolutionary forces counter cooperation. The trait of supporting others is dominated by selfish behavior. In the last few decades scientists, in particular biologists, achieved extraordinary progress regarding the question of how cooperation is possible despite of evolutionary forces. This produced an enormous amount of literature. This paper identifies and reviews the known solutions explaining cooperation under evolutionary forces. Using bibliometric methods in combination with extant review articles and traditional reviewing of original literature, it is possible to isolate 11 mechanisms of cooperation under the conditions of evolution. Developing a categorization of the mechanisms according to shared characteristics establishes a fundamental framework for institutional and mechanism design activities. Implications for future research paths are identified, in particular for the mechanism of indirect reciprocity. Addresses: Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, D-80333 Munich, Germany. E-mail Addresses: michael.zaggl at tum.de Cited Reference Count: 120 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND ISSN: 1744-1374 eISSN: 1744-1382 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AM0QZ Unique ID: WOS:000339552300002 Cited References: Alexander R. D., 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, Milinski M, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V268, P2495 NOWAK M, 1993, NATURE, V364, P56 Hauert C, 2002, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V218, P187 Nowak M.A., 1993, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos in Applied Sciences and Engineering, V3, Euler HA, 1996, HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVECongress of the Gesellschaft-fur-Anthropologie - Anthropology Today, OCT 05, 1994, POTSDAM, GERMANY, V7, P39 GRAFEN A, 1990, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V144, P517 Ockenfels P., 1993, European Journal of Political Economy, V9, P576 Santos FC, 2006, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V273, P51 Gintis H, 2000, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V206, P169 Nowak MA, 1998, NATURE, V393, P573 ANDERSSON M, 1984, ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, V15, P165 Fehr E, 1997, ECONOMETRICA, V65, P833 Milinski M, 2002, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V269, P881 Santos FC, 2005, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V95, Nowak Martin A., 2006, SCIENCE, V314, P1560 Tarnita Corina E., 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V106, P8601 Wynne-Edwards VC, 1962, Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour, SMITH JM, 1991, ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, V42, P1034 Leimar O, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V268, P745 HAMILTON WD, 1964, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V7, P17 Nakamaru M, 1997, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V184, P65 Hauert C, 2002, SCIENCE, V296, P1129 van den Bergh Jeroen C. J. M., 2009, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, V72, P1 SMITH JM, 1964, NATURE, V201, P1145 Nowak MA, 2005, NATURE, V437, P1291 Skyrms B, 2000, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V97, P9340 Taylor Christine, 2009, GAMES, GROUPS, AND THE GLOBAL GOOD, P41 Fehr E, 2002, HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, V13, P1 Dufwenberg M, 2004, GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, V47, P268 Chen Chaomei, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1386 Thorne BL, 1997, ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, V28, P27 Williams M. L., 2003, International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, V3, P191 SMALL H, 1980, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V36, P183 Sigmund Karl, 2012, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V299, P25 Turner J., 1986, Psychology of intergroup relations, P7 Rockenbach Bettina, 2006, NATURE, V444, P718 Dugatkin LA, 1996, BIOSYSTEMS, V37, P19 Luo Lingzhi, 2011, COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL ORGANIZATION THEORY, V17, P379 Dawkins R, 2006, The selfish gene, Gmur M, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V57, P27 Smith J. Maynard, 1982, Evolution and the Theory of Games, ZAHAVI A, 1975, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V53, P205 NOWAK MA, 1994, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, V4, P33 Bergmueller Ralph, 2007, BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, V76, P61 West S. A., 2007, JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, V20, P415 Hooper Paul L., 2010, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V265, P633 Nowak Martin A., 2007, P7 JOHNSON R, 1986, MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, V19, P341 Darwin C., 1871, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, VI, Hauert Christoph, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1905 Dreber Anna, 2008, NATURE, V452, P348 NOWAK MA, 1992, NATURE, V359, P826 Darwin C., 1872, The Origin of Species, RUBINSTEIN A, 1979, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, V21, P1 Kogut B, 1996, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V7, P502 Dugatkin L.A., 1997, Cooperation Among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective, Gurerk O, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P108 Bergstrom TC, 2002, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V16, P67 von Krogh Georg, 2012, MIS QUARTERLY, V36, P649 Choi Jung-Kyoo, 2007, SCIENCE, V318, P636 Boyd R, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V100, P3531 Nowak MA, 1998, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V194, P561 Ohtsuki H, 2006, NATURE, V441, P502 Seymour Ben, 2007, NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, V8, P300 MOLANDER P, 1985, JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, V29, P611 Nowak Martin A., 2010, NATURE, V466, P1057 Lieberman E, 2005, NATURE, V433, P312 Traulsen Arne, 2006, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V103, P10952 TAYLOR RJ, 1990, ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, V39, P860 Veblen Thorstein, 1899, The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, Clutton-Brock Tim, 2009, NATURE, V462, P51 DURRETT R, 1994, THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, V46, P363 Axelrod R., 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, Fehr E, 1998, JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, V16, P324 ORBELL JM, 1993, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V58, P787 Dugatkin LA, 1997, BIOSCIENCE, V47, P355 Ohtsuki Hisashi, 2006, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V273, P2249 REEVE HK, 1990, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V87, P2496 Arrow K., 1962, The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, P609 Nathanson Charles G., 2009, PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, V5, Nakamaru M, 1998, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V194, P101 TRIVERS RL, 1971, QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, V46, P35 Ebel H, 2002, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V66, Brandt H, 2004, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V231, P475 Ohtsuki Hisashi, 2009, NATURE, V457, P79 Aumann R. J., 1985, Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare, P209 Abramson G, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V63, Fehr E, 1999, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V114, P817 Ohtsuki H, 2004, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V231, P107 Sigmund K, 2010, CALCULUS OF SELFISHNESS, P1 Lehmann L., 2006, JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, V19, P1365 Killingback T, 2006, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V273, P1477 HAMILTON WD, 1964, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V7, P1 Fehr E, 2002, NATURE, V415, P137 JARVIS JUM, 1981, SCIENCE, V212, P571 WILSON DS, 1975, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V72, P143 RUSHTON JP, 1984, BEHAVIOR GENETICS, V14, P179 Jarneving B, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P245 Hauert C, 2004, NATURE, V428, P643 Clauset A, 2004, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V70, Bolton GE, 2000, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V90, P166 WADE MJ, 1978, QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, V53, P101 HASSELL MP, 1994, NATURE, V370, P290 Troitzsch K. G., 2012, Proceedings of the 8th European Social Simulation Association Conference, P291 Keller L, 1998, NATURE, V394, P573 Engelmann Dirk, 2009, GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, V67, P399 RABIN M, 1993, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V83, P1281 Semmann D, 2003, NATURE, V425, P390 BOYD R, 1989, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V11, P213 AXELROD R, 1981, SCIENCE, V211, P1390 Santos Francisco C., 2006, PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, V2, P1284 Gintis Herbert, 2008, SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, V21, P241 SPENCE M, 1973, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V87, P355 Nowak MA, 2004, NATURE, V428, P646 Arrow KJ, 1971, Essays in the theory of risk- bearing, Osareh F, 1996, LIBRI, V46, P149 Stevens JR, 2005, ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, V36, P499 Uchida Satoshi, 2010, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V263, P13 Fehr E, 2004, TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, V8, P185 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339480400016 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Scientific Inquiry Into Rhinosinusitis: Who is Receiving Funding From the National Institutes of Health? Authors: Folbe, AJ; Svider, PF; Setzen, M; Zuliani, G; Lin, HS; Eloy, JA Author Full Names: Folbe, Adam J.; Svider, Peter F.; Setzen, Michael; Zuliani, Giancarlo; Lin, Ho-Sheng; Eloy, Jean Anderson Source: LARYNGOSCOPE, 124 (6):1301-1307; 10.1002/lary.24525 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Rhinosinusitis, sinusitis, National Institutes of Health funding, National Institutes of Health awards, scholarly impact, h-index KeyWords Plus: EXPERT WITNESS QUALIFICATION; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; H-INDEX; ACADEMIC OTOLARYNGOLOGY; SCHOLARLY PRODUCTIVITY; MALPRACTICE LITIGATION; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; GENDER DISPARITIES; IMPACT; ANESTHESIOLOGISTS Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis: To evaluate National Institutes of Health (NIH) support for rhinosinusitis research and characterize the proportion of funding awarded to otolaryngologists. Study Design: Analysis of the NIH RePORTER database. Methods: Specialty and terminal-degree of primary investigators (PIs) for 131 projects spanning 364 fiscal years (1989 to present) were determined. Awards for projects examining rhinosinusitis were organized by size, academic department, and PI scholarly impact (using h-indices). Analysis of geographic and temporal funding trends was performed and organized by PI specialty. Results: A total of 62.6% of projects were awarded to physicians, one-third of whom were otolaryngologists. Allergists/immunologists had greater median awards than otolaryngologist PIs (P = .02), and pediatric-trained PIs had a greater h-index than otolaryngologist PIs (P = .04). Although year-to-year fluctuation was noted, otolaryngologists have received approximately a quarter of total rhinosinusitis funding since 2000. PIs practicing in the south-Atlantic, east-north-central, and west-north-central states had the greatest funding totals, whereas otolaryngologists had a greater proportion of regional funding in the Pacific and east-south-central states than other regions. Conclusions: Inquiry into the mechanisms underlying rhinosinusitis and optimal therapeutic strategies represents an interdisciplinary venture. PIs in medicine and pediatric departments had greater funding for rhinosinusitis projects than individuals in otolaryngology departments, partly because of greater utilization of PhD faculty. Otolaryngology departments may consider increased recruitment of basic scientists interested in rhinosinusitis as a means to facilitate increased scholarship in this area. Encouraging pursuit of funding opportunities is critical for otolaryngologists, as well-funded practitioners may have greater opportunities to shape advances and serve as an advocate for their approaches. Addresses: [Folbe, Adam J.; Svider, Peter F.; Zuliani, Giancarlo; Lin, Ho-Sheng] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Detroit, MI 48201 USA. [Setzen, Michael] N Shore Univ Hosp, Rhinol Sect, Manhasset, NY USA. [Setzen, Michael] NYU, Dept Otolaryngol, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA. [Zuliani, Giancarlo; Lin, Ho-Sheng] John D Dingell VA Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Otolaryngol Sect, Detroit, MI USA. [Eloy, Jean Anderson] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ USA. [Eloy, Jean Anderson] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ USA. [Eloy, Jean Anderson] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Neurol Inst New Jersey, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ USA. E-mail Addresses: psvider at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 49 Times Cited: 2 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0023-852X eISSN: 1531-4995 Web of Science Categories: Medicine, Research & Experimental; Otorhinolaryngology Research Areas: Research & Experimental Medicine; Otorhinolaryngology IDS Number: AL9SF Unique ID: WOS:000339480400016 Cited References: Soler Zachary M., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P2341 Pagel P. S., 2011, ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, V55, P1085 Agarwal Nitin, 2013, World neurosurgery, V80, P738 Pashkova A. A., 2013, ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, V57, P1058 Hsu Joy, 2013, JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, V131, P977 Tan Bruce K., 2010, CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V18, P21 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P118 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P103 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2014, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V120, P185 Svider PF, Ophthalmology, Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V149, P649 Svider Peter F., 2014, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V120, P191 Rezek Issa, 2011, ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, V18, P1337 Colaco Marc, 2013, JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, V190, P999 Jeang Kuan-Teh, 2008, RETROVIROLOGY, V5, Colombo Elena, 2012, JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, V590, P519 Svider Peter F., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, V27, PE131 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V149, P77 KENNEDY DW, 1985, ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, V111, P643 Poetker David M, 2007, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, V15, P6 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2014, INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, V4, P85 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P1865 Garrison HH, 2013, NIH Research Funding Trends: FY1995-2013. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Harris S, 2010, Pediatrics Field in Subspecialist Shortage. Association of American Medical Colleges, Pagel P. S., 2011, ANAESTHESIA, V66, P873 Pagel P. S., 2011, BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, V107, P357 Lee Janet, 2009, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V111, P387 Nabavi M, 2014, Allergologia et immunopathologia, V42, P465 Sharma Bharat, 2013, SURGERY, V153, P493 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V148, P215 Rad Arash Ehteshami, 2012, ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, V19, P455 Turaga Kiran K., 2012, JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, V69, P499 Eloy JA, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, Association of American Medical Colleges, 2012, Physician Specialty Data Book, Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V148, P764 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P884 Benway Brian M., 2009, UROLOGY, V74, P30 Kotchen TA, 2004, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V291, P836 Li Chunwei, 2013, CURRENT ALLERGY AND ASTHMA REPORTS, V13, P209 Close Lanny Garth, 2009, LARYNGOSCOPE112th Annual Meeting of the Triological-Society/Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting, MAY 28-31, 2009, Phoenix, AZ, V119, P2293 Cucchetti Alessandro, 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, V206, P560 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2012, LARYNGOSCOPE, V122, P2690 Pagel Paul S., 2011, JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, V25, P761 Rad Arash Ehteshami, 2010, ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, V17, P817 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Hulse Kathryn E., 2014, JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, V133, P275 Wilson Lynn D., 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V85, P1168 KENNEDY DW, 1985, ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, V111, P576 Svider Peter F., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, V34, P464 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339986500022 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Evaluating Scholarly Book Publishers-A Case Study in the Field of Journalism Authors: Neville, TM; Henry, DB Author Full Names: Neville, Tina M.; Henry, Deborah B. Source: JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 40 (3-4):379-387; 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.05.005 MAY-JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Book publishing, Publishers, Metrics, Faculty tenure and promotion, Journalism KeyWords Plus: SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH OUTPUT; ECONOMICS JOURNALS; POLITICAL-SCIENCE; CITATION IMPACT; SOCIAL-SCIENCES; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; H-INDEX; QUALITY; RANKING; PUBLICATIONS Abstract: By adapting multiple metrics used for journal article evaluation and replicating recent publisher metrics, the authors tested methods for evaluating scholarly book publishers. Using monographs published in journalism between 2007 and 2011 as a test case, results indicate that these methods may be useful to other scholarly disciplines. (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Neville, Tina M.; Henry, Deborah B.] Univ S Florida, Nelson Poynter Mem Lib, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USA. E-mail Addresses: neville at mail.usf.edu; henry at mail.usf.edu Cited Reference Count: 36 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA ISSN: 0099-1333 eISSN: 1879-1999 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AM6PG Unique ID: WOS:000339986500022 Cited References: LABAND DN, 1990, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V28, P655 Bornmann Lutz, 2009, EMBO REPORTS, V10, P2 Braun Tibor, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P169 Nosek Brian A., 2010, PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, V36, P1283 Kleijnen JPC, 2000, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V36, P551 Metz P, 1996, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V57, P234 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Lewis JS, 2000, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V61, P313 Garand James C., 2011, PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, V44, P375 Gabbidon S. L., 2012, American Journal of Criminal Justice, V37, P33 OCLC WorldCat, 2013, What is WorldCat?, Cabezas-Clavijo A., 2013, Scientometrics, P1 Black P. E., 2004, Dictionary of algorithms and data structures, Andres A, 2009, MEASURING ACADEMIC RESEARCH: HOW TO UNDERTAKE A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY, P1 LIEBOWITZ SJ, 1984, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V22, P77 Wiberley SE, 2004, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V65, P505 University of Kentucky. School of Journalism and Telecommunications, 2009, Research expectations for regular-title assistant professors, GOEDEKEN EA, 1993, LIBRARY ACQUISITIONS-PRACTICE AND THEORY, V17, P263 Thomson Reuters, 2013, Citation metrics, Fedler F., 1984, annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, 5-8 August, 1984, Gainesville, FL, Hodge David R., 2011, JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, V47, P579 Stremlo E., 2012, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, V10, P123 Wiberley SE, 2002, PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, V2, P357 Goodson LP, 1999, PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, V32, P257 Pulgarin A, 2004, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V40, P365 CALHOUN J, 1983, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V44, P257 Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications, 2013, ACEJMC accreditation status 2012-2013, Prathap Gangan, 2006, CURRENT SCIENCE, V91, P1439 White Howard D., 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1083 Gabbidon S. L., 2010, Journal of Criminal Justice Education, V21, P229 Schweitzer J. C., 1989, Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, V44, P45 Kousha Kayvan, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P2147 University of Florida. College of Journalism and Communications, 2011, ACENC self-study report 2010-11. Part II. Standard 5, Anderson D. A, 1992, Journalism Educator, V47, P74 Torres-Salinas Daniel, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P9 Lopez-Cozar E. D., 2012, Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, V35, P615 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339932100008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Scientific production of deans of medicine and health of Central American Universities Authors: Urquia-Osorio, H; Henriquez-Marquez, KI; Vasquez-Bonilla, WO; Estrada-Mendoza, AJ; Rodriguez-Morales, AJ Author Full Names: Urquia-Osorio, Hebel; Iveth Henriquez-Marquez, Karla; Oqueli Vasquez-Bonilla, Walter; Josue Estrada-Mendoza, Albert; Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J. Source: SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 56 (3):243-244; MAY-JUN 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Letter KeyWords Plus: INDEX Addresses: [Urquia-Osorio, Hebel; Iveth Henriquez-Marquez, Karla; Oqueli Vasquez-Bonilla, Walter; Josue Estrada-Mendoza, Albert] Univ Nacl Autonoma Honduras, Fac Ciencias Med, Asociac Cient Estudiantes Med, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. [Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.] Univ Tecnol Pereira, Fac Ciencias Salud, Dept Med Comunitaria, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia. E-mail Addresses: arodriguezm at utp.edu.co Cited Reference Count: 6 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INST NACIONAL SALUD PUBLICA, AV UNIVERSIDAD 655, COL SANTA MARIA AHUACATITLAN, CUERNAVACA 62508, MORELOS, MEXICO ISSN: 0036-3634 eISSN: 1606-7916 Web of Science Categories: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Research Areas: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health IDS Number: AM5WQ Unique ID: WOS:000339932100008 Cited References: Pereyra-El?as Rene?, 2011, Revista de gastroenterolog?a del Per? : ?rgano oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterolog?a del Per?, V31, P124 Monge-Najera Julian, 2012, REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA TROPICAL, V60, P1649 Taype-Rond?n ?lvaro, 2013, FEM: Revista de la Fundaci?n Educaci?n M?dica, V16, P5 Abudinen A Gabriel, 2012, SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, V54, P459 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Mayta-Trist?n Percy, 2013, Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud p?blica, V30, P720 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Obliteration by Incorporation Authors: McCain, KW Author Full Names: McCain, Katherine W. Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 129-149; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION; CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE; SLEEPING BEAUTIES; FOCUSED INTERVIEW; CITER MOTIVATIONS; ORTEGA HYPOTHESIS; CITING BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT SYMBOLS; BIG SCIENCE Addresses: Drexel Univ, iSch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. E-mail Addresses: mccainkw at drexel.edu Cited Reference Count: 91 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300008 Cited References: Lambe Patrick, 2011, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V15, P175 Schwartz CA, 1997, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V58, P19 HARGENS LL, 1984, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V49, P685 Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, McCain Katherine W., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1412 McCain K. W., 2012, Pre-Conference on the History of ASIST and Information Science and Technology, ASIST 2012, Baltimore, MERTON RK, 1987, PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, V51, P550 Harwood Nigel, 2009, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V41, P497 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 McCain K. W., 2012, METRICS 2012, SIG/Metrics preconference workshop at ASIST 2012, Baltimore, Borgman Christine L., 2002, Annual review of information science and technology, V36, P2 SOUTHERN EM, 1975, JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, V98, P503 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 MACROBERTS MH, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P293 White HD, 2004, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V25, P89 BROOKS TA, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P223 MACROBERTS MH, 1988, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V39, P432 Wang PL, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V50, P98 SZAVAKOVATS E, 1994, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V20, P55 Edge D, 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching, V17, P102 HighWire Press, 2012, Free online full-text articles, Braun Tibor, 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P195 Costas Rodrigo, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P329 SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Franck G, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P53 Messeri P., 1978, annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, Marx Werner, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P1 Furner J, 2003, JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, V35, P189 THOMAS KS, 1992, SCIENTOMETRICS, V24, P405 Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 GARFIELD E, 1975, CURRENT CONTENTS, P5 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Bjork B.-C., 2007, Information Research, V12, ROUSSEAU R, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V11, P217 CANO V, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P284 MacRoberts M. H., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1 Small H., 1980, Scientometrics, V2, P270 STENT GS, 1972, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, V227, P84 GARFIELD E, 1980, CURRENT CONTENTS, P5 Stigler S. M., 1980, Science and social structure: A Festschrift for Robert K. Merton, P147 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics, SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 MCCAIN KW, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V17, P127 COLE JR, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC, P281 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, HOERMAN HL, 1995, LIBRARY QUARTERLYAmerican-Society-for-Information-Science Miniconference, APR 24, 1993, BLOOMINGTON, IN, V65, P415 Merton R. K., 1965, On the shoulders of giants: A shandean postscript, STIGLER SM, 1994, STATISTICAL SCIENCE, V9, P94 Garfield E, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P69 Small H, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P143 Marx Werner, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P433 Cronin B., 1984, The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, AVERSA ES, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P383 Wouters P., 1999, The citation culture, Merton R. K., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, Pix MERTON RK, 1972, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V78, P9 White MD, 1997, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V67, P122 Hyland K., 1999, Applied Linguistics, V20, P541 MERTON RK, 1988, ISIS, V79, P606 Schneider Jesper W., 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P573 Burrell Quentin L., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1466 Garfield E., 1977, Essays of an Information Scientist, V3, P1 VINKLER P, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P47 COZZENS SE, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V15, P437 Merton Robert K., 1946, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V51, P541 Kahneman D, 2003, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V93, P1449 Leonard-Barton D., 1995, Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, ZUCKERMAN H, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P329 Case DO, 2000, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V51, P635 Lave J., 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, GARVEY WD, 1967, SCIENCE, V157, P1011 Bottom W. P., 2007, The palimpsestic syndrome in management research: Stereotypes and the obliteration process, STERN RE, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P193 Dervos D. A., 2008, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V45, P1 GARFIELD E, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P487 MCCAIN KW, 2006, MYTHICAL MONTH J INF, V32, P277 CRONIN B, 1981, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V3, P27 McCain Katherine W., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P2129 Small H., 1982, V3, P287 MACROBERTS MH, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P342 Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Harwood Nigel, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V77, P253 Newman MEJ, 2003, SIAM REVIEW, V45, P167 Brooks Jr F. P., 1975, The mythical man-month, Gorraiz Juan, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P627 BROOKS TA, 1986, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V37, P34 van Raan AFJ, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P467 Merton R. K., 1956, The focused interview, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: "The Data-It Is Me!" ("Les donnees-c'est Moi!") Authors: Day, RE Author Full Names: Day, Ronald E. Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 67-84; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: DOCUMENT Addresses: Indiana Univ Bloomington, Sch Informat & Comp, Dept Informat & Lib Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA. E-mail Addresses: roday at indiana.edu Cited Reference Count: 24 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300005 Cited References: Liu A, 2004, The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information, Burrows Roger, 2012, SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V60, P355 Thomas N., 2012, conference of the Canadian Communication Association, May, 2012, Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario, Engels F., 1848, Marx/Engels Selected Works, V1, SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Hayles Katherine, 2012, How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis, Heidegger M., 1977, Martin Heidegger: Basic writings from Being and Time (1927) to the Task of Thinking (1964), P115 Day R. E., 2001, The modern invention of information: Discourse, history, and power, Blanchette JF, 2002, INFORMATION SOCIETY, V18, P33 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics, Ekbia HR, 2008, ARTIFICIAL DREAMS: THE QUEST FOR NON-BIOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE, P1 Bowker Geoffrey, 2005, Memory Practices in the Sciences, Latour Bruno, 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Sosteric M, 1999, Endowing mediocrity: Neoliberalism, information technology, and the decline of radical pedagogy, Marx K., 1973, Grundrisse, Thomas N., 2011, Social computing as social rationality, Cronin B, 2002, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V53, P1267 Cronin B, 1999, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V50, P953 Briet S., 2006, What is documentation?: English translation of the classic French text, CRONIN B, 1994, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V45, P537 Althusser L., 2001, Lenin and philosophy and other essays, P85 Wouters Paul, 2012, Users, narcissism and control - tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21stcentury, Ding Ying, 2011, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V47, P80 Walsh John A., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P185 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: History and Evolution of (Biblio) Metrics Authors: De Bellis, N Author Full Names: De Bellis, Nicola Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 23-44; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION; INDICATORS; DOCUMENTS; SCIENCE Addresses: [De Bellis, Nicola] Med Lib, Modena, Italy. E-mail Addresses: nicola.debellis at unimore.it Cited Reference Count: 52 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300003 Cited References: Cronin B., 1984, The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, Otlet P., 1934, Traite de documentation: Le livre sur le livre, BENSMAN SJ, 1985, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V46, P13 Wouters P., 1999, The citation culture, SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 NACKE O, 1979, NACHRICHTEN FUR DOKUMENTATION, V30, P219 Mulchenko B. M., 1971, Measurement of science: Study of the development of science as an information process, Cole F. J., 1917, Science Progress, V11, P578 Bradford S. C., 1934, Engineering, V137, P85 Van Raan AFJ, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P129 SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Borner K., 2010, Atlas of science: Visualizing what we know, PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 MOED HF, 1985, RESEARCH POLICY, V14, P131 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Gross P L, 1927, Science (New York, N.Y.), V66, P385 Egghe L, 2005, POWER LAWS IN THE INFORMATION PRODUCTION PROCESS: LOTKAIAN INFORMETRICS, P1 Quetelet A., 1968, A treatise on man and the development of his faculties, Condorcet J A N de Caritat Marquis de, 1994, Condorcet: Foundations of social choice and political theory, P93 Latour Bruno, 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Baldi S, 1998, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V63, P829 Zipf G. K., 1936, The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology, Glanzel W., 2010, Journal of Informetrics, V4, P313 Anderson R. L., 2003, The Cambridge history of philosophy, 1870-1945, P221 Zuckerman H., 1978, Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Hacking Ian, 1990, The Taming of Chance, 1986, Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world, Leydesdorff L., 2001, The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications, 1973, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, P267 De Solla Price D., 1963, Little Science, Big Science, Thelwall M, 2005, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V39, P81 1906, American men of science: A biographical directory, Galton Francis, 1869, Hereditary Genius, an Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences, GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 2012, MODELS OF SCIENCE DYNAMICS: ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN COMPLEXITY THEORY AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, P1 Wilson P. W., 1935, SCIENTIFIC MONTHLY, V41, P240 Salsburg D., 2001, The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century, Lotka A.J., 1926, J. Washington Acad. Sci., V16, P317 Durkheim E., 1964, The rules of sociological method, Candolle A. de, 1873, Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux sieclesHistory of science and scientists for two centuries, STEWART JA, 1983, SOCIAL FORCES, V62, P166 Narin F., 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, SCHUBERT A, 1986, SCIENTOMETRICS, V9, P281 BROOKES BC, 1979, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V30, P233 Galton F., 1874, English men of science: Their nature and nurture, Bernal J. D., 1967, The social function of science, Garfield E., 1983, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, Garfield E., 1964, The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science, PRITCHAR.A, 1969, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V25, P348 Comte A., 1880, A general view of positivism, MARTIN BR, 1983, RESEARCH POLICY, V12, P61 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Scholars and Scripts, Spoors and Scores Authors: Cronin, B Author Full Names: Cronin, Blaise Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 3-21; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP; CITATION ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATION; SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; DISCIPLINES; KNOWLEDGE; ONLINE; IMPACT Addresses: [Cronin, Blaise] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Bloomington, IN USA. [Cronin, Blaise] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland. E-mail Addresses: bcronin at indiana.edu Cited Reference Count: 68 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300002 Cited References: Wouters P, 2012, Users, narcissism and control-tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century, Borgman C. L, 2012, National Research Council of the National Academies, For attribution: Developing data attribution and citation practices and standards, P1 LiquidPub, 2012, Liquid publications: Scientific publications meet the web, Costas Rodrigo, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1647 Cronin B., 2009, Stickmen: Reflections on the goalie's eccentric art, Groth P., The anatomy of a nano publication, Cronin B., 2005, The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards, Arkes H., 2010, The social costs of pornography, P127 Dalrymple T., 2005, Our culture, what's left of it: The mandarins and the masses, Dear P. R., 2000, Encyclopedia of the scientific revolution: From Copernicus to Newton, P668 Koku E, 2001, AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, V44, P1752 Hoover E., 2012, Chronicle of Higher Education, Thelwall Mike, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P429 Wagner CS, 2008, NEW INVISIBLE COLLEGE: SCIENCE FOR DEVELOPMENT, P1 Gross A. G., 2002, Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present, Lozano George A., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P2140 Kravitz D. J., 2011, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, V5, Priem J., 2012, arXiv:1203.4745v1, Bollen J, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1419 Cronin Blaise, 2012, INFORMATION & CULTURE, V47, P18 Blatecky A., 2012, National Research Council of the National Academies, The future of scientific knowledge discovery in open networked environments, P3 Cronin B, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P1319 2000, The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield, Shuai Xin, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Crane D., 1972, Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities, Hatch R. A., 2000, Encyclopedia of the scientific revolution: From Copernicus to Newton, P263 Howard J., 2012, Chronicle of Higher Education, Eysenbach G., 2011, Journal of Medical Internet Research, V13, Cronin B, 2001, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCEConference of the Edinburgh-Social-Informatics-Group on Knowledge Management in the Age of Networks, OCT 27, 2000, EDINBURGH, SCOTLAND, V27, P129 Ragone A, 2009, Liquid book: Reuse and sharing of multifacet content for evolving books, Kurtz Michael J., 2010, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V44, P3 Cronin B., 2007, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, V57, P1909 Russell T.G., 2009, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, V50, Veletsianos George, 2012, COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, V58, P766 Cronin B, 2001, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V52, P558 Corbyn Z., 2008, Times Higher Education, Burrows Roger, 2012, SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V60, P355 Lewison G, 2005, CURRENT SCIENCE, V89, P1524 2011, Improving future research communication and e-scholarship, HEFFNER AG, 1981, SCIENTOMETRICS, V3, P5 Vanclay Jerome K., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P211 Cronin B, 2002, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V53, P1267 Priem J., 2010, Alt-metrics: A manifesto, Haustein Stefanie, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P446 Bourdieu P., 1988, Homo Academicus, Wilhite Allen W., 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P542 CRONIN B, 1994, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V45, P61 Lomas R., 2002, The invisible college: The Royal Society, freemasonry and the birth of modern science, Davenport E., 1993, Risks and rewards and electronic publishing: A case study of information science in the United Kingdom using a qualitative methodology, Bauman Zygmunt, 2007, Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty, MACROBERTS MH, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P342 Schroeder R., 2011, Putting scientometrics in its place [v0], Davis P., 2011, Gaming the impact factor puts journal in time-out, HICKS D, 1991, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V21, P459 Waterman S., Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, Bauman Z., 2003, Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds , Watson A. B., 2009, Journal of Vision (Charlottesville, Va.), V9, Franck G, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P53 LONG JS, 1982, SCIENTOMETRICS, V4, P379 Jensen M., 2007, Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review, Bourne P, 2005, PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, V1, P179 De Angelis Massimo, 2009, HISTORICAL MATERIALISM-RESEARCH IN CRITICAL MARXIST THEORY, V17, P3 Sosteric M., 1999, Radical Pedagogy, V1, Gazni A., 2011, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V63, P323 Manten A. A., 1980, Development of scientific publishing in Europe, P1 SEGLEN PO, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P628 Baez M., Liquid journals: Knowledge dissemination in the Web era, Taleb N.N., 2010, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility, ======================================================================== * VIEW FULL RECORD http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Science Visualization and Discursive Knowledge Authors: Leydesdorff, L Author Full Names: Leydesdorff, Loet Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 167-185; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: INFORMATION-SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL-THEORY; INTELLECTUAL SPACE; COCITATION; CITATION; COMMUNICATION; PERSPECTIVE; INDICATORS; SYSTEMS; AUTHORS Addresses: [Leydesdorff, Loet] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Leydesdorff, Loet] Univ Sussex, Sci & Technol Policy Res Unit, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England. E-mail Addresses: loet at leydesdorff.net Cited Reference Count: 50 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300010 Cited References: Liu Zhicheng, 2010, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, V16, P999 Yeung Raymond W., 2008, INFORMATION THEORY AND NETWORK CODING, P1 WHITE HD, 1982, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V38, P255 Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P499 KAMADA T, 1989, INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, V31, P7 Leydesdorff Loet, 2013, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V25, P641 GRANOVET.MS, 1973, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V78, P1360 Leydesdorff L., Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, KRUSKAL JB, 1964, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V29, P1 Lucio-Arias Diana, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P261 Leydesdorff L., 2011, Information sur les sciences sociales, V50, P1 Blondel Vincent D., 2008, JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, Schiffman S. S., 1981, Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications, White HD, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P327 Freeman L., 2004, The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Ahlgren P, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P550 Borner K, 2003, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V37, P179 SMALL H, 1986, SCIENTOMETRICS, V10, P95 Kruskal J, 1978, Multidimensional Scaling, CALLON M, 1983, SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, V22, P191 Salton G., 1983, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, Leydesdorff L, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P1469 MISUE K, 1995, JOURNAL OF VISUAL LANGUAGES AND COMPUTING, V6, P183 Schank T., 2008, Dynamic graph drawing in Visone, Leydesdorff Loet, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P1810 Fujigaki Y, 1998, SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, V37, P5 Burt R.S., 1992, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Krippendorff Klaus, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, V38, P669 Tijssen RJW, 1987, Scientometrics, V11, P347 Leydesdorff L, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P5 Mrvar Andrej, 2005, Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, MCCAIN KW, 1990, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V41, P433 Maturana H. R., 1978, Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg, P27 LEYDESDORFF L, 1986, SCIENTOMETRICS, V9, P103 Borner K., 2010, Atlas of science: Visualizing what we know, SMALL H, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P391 Garfield E., 1987, Current Contents, P3 Gansner E. R., 2005, Graph drawing Lecture notes in computer science, P239 Leydesdorff Loet, 2010, ENTROPY, V12, P63 SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYSTEM TECHNICAL JOURNAL, V27, P623 Luhmann Niklas, 1995, Social systems, Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P87 Husserl E, 1973, Cartesian meditations and the Paris lecturesCartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vortrage, SPSS, 1993, SPSS professional statistics 6.1, Leydesdorff L., 1987, Scientometrics, V11, P291 Leydesdorff Loet, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P1616 Wampler K., 2004, Graph drawing, V2912, P96 Landauer TK, 1998, DISCOURSE PROCESSES, V25, P259 DOREIAN P, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P28 SMALL H, 1985, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V11, P147 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Criteria for Evaluating Indicators Authors: Gingras, Y Author Full Names: Gingras, Yves Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 109-125; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: SOCIAL-SCIENCES; HUMANITIES; OUTPUT; INDEX Addresses: [Gingras, Yves] Univ Quebec Montreal, Dept Hist, Montreal, PQ, Canada. [Gingras, Yves] OST, New Delhi, India. E-mail Addresses: gingras.yves at uqam.ca Cited Reference Count: 31 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300007 Cited References: Gingras Yves, 2008, HISTORY OF SCIENCE, V46, P75 Gladwell M, 2011, The New Yorker, P68 Cronin B., 1984, The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, Mines Paris Tech, 2011, International Professional Ranking of Higher Education Institutions, Lawrence Peter A., 2007, CURRENT BIOLOGY, V17, PR583 Archambault Eric, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P329 Narin F., 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, Gingras Yves, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF BIOLOGY, V43, P159 Saroyan A., 2007, Higher Education Management and Policy, V19, P31 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Enserink Martin, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1026 Gingras Y., 2009, La Recherche, P46 Bollen J., 2009, PLoS ONE, V4, Pe6022 Lariviere Vincent, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P997 van Leeuwen Thed, 2008, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V17, P157 Archambault Eric, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1320 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Merton R., 1973, The sociology of science, 1979, Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, Cole J. R., 1973, Social stratification in science, Council of Canadian Academies, 2012, Informing research choices: Indicators and judgment. Report of the Expert Panel on Science Performance and Research Funding, Bourdin J., 2008, Rapport d'information fait au nom de la delegation du Senat pour la Planification sur le defi des classements dans l'enseignement superieur, Waltman L., 2011, The inconsistency of the h-index, Crane D., 1972, Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities, Gingras Y., 2009, University Affairs, Hazelkorn E., 2007, Higher Education Management and Policy, V19, P87 Florian Razvan V., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P25 Rovner Sophie L., 2008, CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, V86, P39 LAZARSFELD PF, 1958, DAEDALUS, V87, P99 Ranking Web of Universities, 2012, Methodology, IREG, 2011, IREG ranking audit manual, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Bibliometric Standards for Evaluating Research Institutes in the Natural Sciences Authors: Bornmann, L; Bowman, BF; Bauer, J; Marx, W; Schier, H; Palzenberger, M Author Full Names: Bornmann, Lutz; Bowman, Benjamin F.; Bauer, Johann; Marx, Werner; Schier, Hermann; Palzenberger, Margit Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 201-223; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CITATION DISTRIBUTIONS; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; SELF-CITATION; IMPACT FACTOR; QUALITY; UNIVERSALITY; INDICATORS; JOURNALS; VALIDITY; LEVEL Addresses: [Bornmann, Lutz] Max Planck Gesell, Div Sci & Innovat Studies Adm Headquarters, Munich, Germany. [Bowman, Benjamin F.] Max Planck Gesell, Biol & Med Sect, Establishing Sci Informat Retrieval Serv, Munich, Germany. [Bauer, Johann] Max Planck Inst Biochem, Informat Retrieval Grp, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany. [Bauer, Johann] Max Planck Gesell, Biol & Med Sect, Munich, Germany. [Marx, Werner; Schier, Hermann] Max Planck Gesell, Inst Chem Phys Tech Sect, Informat Serv, Munich, Germany. [Marx, Werner] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Stuttgart, Germany. [Palzenberger, Margit] Salzburg Univ, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria. E-mail Addresses: Lutz.Bornmann at gv.mpg.de; bowman at biochem.mpg.de; jbauer at biochem.mpg.de; w.marx at fkf.mpg.de; h.schier at fkf.mpg.de; palzenberger at mpdl.mpg.de Cited Reference Count: 63 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300012 Cited References: Tijssen RJW, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V54, P381 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Daniel Hans-Dieter, 2007, Quality Assessment for Higher Education in EuropeSymposium on Quality Assessmentfor Higher Education in Europe, 2006, Pavia, ITALY, P71 Albarran P., 2011, Scientometrics, V88, P385 Meho LI, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P1314 Vinkler P, 2010, EVALUATION OF RESEARCH BY SCIENTOMETRIC INDICATORS, P1 Tijssen R., 2006, Ninth International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Leuven, Belgium, P146 Schubert A., 2006, Scientometrics, V67, P263 Sheskin D.J., 2007, NORIA-net, 2011, Comparing research at Nordic universities using bibliometric indicators: A publication from the NORIA-net ''Bibliometric Indicators for the Nordic Universities.'', American Psychological Association, 2009, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, Bornmann Lutz, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1664 Feller I., 2003, A toolkit for evaluating public R & D investment: Models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade, Schreiber M., 2012, Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them, Radicchi Filippo, 2011, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V83, Strotmann Andreas, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P194 Jacso Peter, 2010, ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, V34, P175 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V45, P199 Wright M., 2007, Verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge?, Abramo Giovanni, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P132 Debackere K., 2009, Scientometrics, V78, P165 Aksnes DW, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V56, P235 Radicchi Filippo, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P17268 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P2427 Snyder H, 1998, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P431 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P587 Boyack KW, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5192 Hemlin Sven, 1996, Social Epistemology, V10, P209 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P173 Moed HF, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P105 Garfield E., 1979, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, Bornmann Lutz, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P27 Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1370 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 MARTIN BR, 1983, RESEARCH POLICY, V12, P61 De Bellis N., 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics, Jacso Peter, 2009, LIBRARY JOURNAL, V134, P26 Abramo Giovanni, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P659 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Seglen P. O., 1992, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, V43, P628 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, V174, P857 StataCorp, 2011, Stata statistical software: release 12, Schreiber M., 2012, Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them, Bornmann L., 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P93 Gagolewski Marek, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P678 Lehmann Sune, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V76, P369 Berghmans T, 2003, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, V14, P715 Garcia-Perez M. A., 2010, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V61, P2070 Lariviere V., 2011, Journal of Informetrics, V5, P392 Wadskog D., 2007, Bibliometric indicators-definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet, Marx W., 2006, Using time-dependent citation rates (sales curves) for comparing scientific impacts, Andres A., 2011, Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study, Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P89 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V64, P650 Randic Milan, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P809 Marx Werner, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P433 Rousseau Ronald, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P416 Bornmann Lutz, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P407 Barbui C, 2006, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, V67, P37 Pendlebury D. A., 2008, Using bibliometrics in evaluating research, Jann B, 2005, STATA JOURNAL, V5, P92 Calver Michael C., 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P611 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339801700001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: THE EVOLUTION OF THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF HIGHLY PRODUCTIVE ECONOMISTS Authors: Carrasco, R; Ruiz-Castillo, J Author Full Names: Carrasco, Raquel; Ruiz-Castillo, Javier Source: ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 52 (1):1-16; 10.1111/ecin.12028 JAN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: LIFE-CYCLE; CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE; INEQUALITY MEASURES; INCOME MOBILITY; SCIENCE; JOURNALS; RANKINGS; PUBLICATIONS; PERFORMANCE; DEPARTMENTS Abstract: This paper studies the evolution of research productivity of a sample of economists working in the best 81 departments in the world in 2007. The main novelty is that, in so far as a productivity distribution can be identified with an income distribution, we measure productivity mobility in a dynamic context using an indicator inspired in an income mobility index suggested by Fields (2010) for a two-period world. Productivity is measured in terms of publications, weighted by the citation impact of the journals where each article is published in the periodical literature. We study the evolution of average productivity, productivity inequality, the extent of rank reversals, and productivity mobility for seven cohorts, as well as the population as a whole. We offer new evidence confirming previous results about the heterogeneity of the evolution of productivity for top and other researchers. However, the major result is that-contrary to what was expected-for our sample of very highly productive scholars the effect of rank reversals between the two periods on overall productivity mobility offsets the effect of an increase in productivity inequality from the first to the second period in the youngest five out of seven cohorts. Addresses: [Carrasco, Raquel; Ruiz-Castillo, Javier] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Econ, Madrid, Spain. [Ruiz-Castillo, Javier] CEPR Project SCIFI GLOW, London, England. E-mail Addresses: rcarras at eco.uc3m.es; jrc at eco.uc3m.es Cited Reference Count: 60 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0095-2583 eISSN: 1465-7295 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AM4DC Unique ID: WOS:000339801700001 Cited References: NELSON RR, 1959, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V67, P297 Coupe Tom, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1309 Merton R. K., 1961, KING MA, 1983, ECONOMETRICA, V51, P99 Hartley J., 2001, American Economist, V45, P80 Kelchtermans Stijn, 2011, INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, V20, P295 Turner L., 2006, Cahiers MSE, Merton R. K., 1957, American Sociological Review, V39, P663 BELL JG, 1978, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V16, P599 SCHUBERT A, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P267 BOURGUIGNON F, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P901 CHAKRAVARTY SR, 1985, SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, V2, P1 Gonzalez-Brambila C., 2007, Department of Engineering and Public Policy Paper 133, Coupe T, 2004, KYKLOS, V57, P197 Henrekson Magnus, 2011, MANCHESTER SCHOOL, V79, P1139 Coupe T, 2006, JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, V22, P137 Oster SM, 1998, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V80, P154 Hall B., 2007, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, V16, P159 HUTCHINSON EB, 1995, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, V26, P59 Stephan P., 2010, V1, P217 Kelchtermans Stijn, 2013, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V95, P273 DIAMOND AM, 1984, SCIENTOMETRICS, V6, P189 Oswald Andrew J., 2007, ECONOMICA, V74, P21 Seglen PO, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P498 SHORROCKS AF, 1980, ECONOMETRICA, V48, P613 Baser O., 2004, V1, P1 Cole J. R., 1973, Social stratification in science, Ruiz-Castillo J., 2004, Journal of Economic Inequality, V2, P219 Albarran Pedro, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P385 ALLISON PD, 1974, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V39, P596 MARKANDYA A, 1984, ECONOMICA, V51, P457 Stephan PE, 1996, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V34, P1199 Stephan PE, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V60, P81 Weiss Y., 1982, Research in Labor Economics, V5, P157 Kalaitzidakis Pantelis, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1346 MARKANDYA A, 1982, EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V17, P307 DASGUPTA P, 1994, RESEARCH POLICY, V23, P487 ALLISON PD, 1982, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V47, P615 Combes Pierre-Philippe, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1250 LEVIN SG, 1991, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V81, P114 MERTON RK, 1988, ISIS, V79, P606 David P. A., 1994, Economics of Technology, Merton R. K., 1973, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, Lotka A.J., 1926, J. Washington Acad. Sci., V16, P317 Fields G. S., 2008, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, De Solla Price D., 1963, Little Science, Big Science, Xie Y, 1998, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V63, P847 Goodwin T., 1995, Southern Economic Journal, V62, P728 Rauber Michael, 2008, GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V9, P431 Carrasco R., 2012, Working Paper, V12-16, Arrow K., 1962, The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, P609 Long S., 1992, Social Forces, V71, P159 Cole J., 1984, Advances in Motivation and Achievement, V2, P217 SHORROCKS AF, 1984, ECONOMETRICA, V52, P1369 Fields Gary S., 2010, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, V8, P409 LABAND DN, 1994, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V32, P640 Kodrzycki Y., 2006, Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, V5.1, Lubrano Michel, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, P1367 GRIMES PW, 1997, J ECON EDUC, V28, P82 SEGLEN PO, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P628 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The Citation: From Culture to Infrastructure Authors: Wouters, P Author Full Names: Wouters, Paul Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 47-66; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: COUNTS; INDEX; UNIVERSITIES; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; BUSINESS; IMPACT Addresses: [Wouters, Paul] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands. [Wouters, Paul] Leiden Univ, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands. [Wouters, Paul] European Project ACUMEN, Austin, TX USA. E-mail Addresses: p.f.wouters at cwts.leidenuniv.nl Cited Reference Count: 65 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300004 Cited References: 2010, Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation, Pringle James, 2008, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V21, P85 Lamont M., 2009, How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment, Edwards PN, 2010, VAST MACHINE: COMPUTER MODELS, CLIMATE DATA, AND THE POLITICS OF GLOBAL WARMING, P1 Leydesdorff L, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS, V44, P169 Glaser J, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS2nd Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informatics/Collaboration in Science and in Technology, SEP 01-04, 2000, BERLIN, GERMANY, V52, P411 KNAW, 2011, Quality indicators for research in the humanities, Whitley R., 1984, The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, Phillips M., 2012, League of European Research Universities?, Wouters P., 1999, The citation culture, De Angelis Massimo, 2009, HISTORICAL MATERIALISM-RESEARCH IN CRITICAL MARXIST THEORY, V17, P3 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P609 Whitley Richard, 2011, MINERVA, V49, P359 van Kammen J., 2009, NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, V17, P500 Hicks Diana, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P251 Wouters P, 1999, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 CONFERENCE ON THE HISTORY AND HERITAGE OF SCIENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMSConference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems, OCT 23-25, 1998, PITTSBURGH, PA, P127 Butler L, 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P565 Laudel G., 2006, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, V28, P289 Butler L, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 16-20, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V32, P143 Woodward R., 2012, Informing research choices: Indicators and judgment, Wouters P, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICSProceedings of the Erasmus Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies, MAY 21-24, 1996, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, V38, P39 Moed H. F., 2007, Science & Public Policy, V34, P575 Weingart P, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P117 Porter T. M., 1995, Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life, ARC, 2012, The Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) initiative, Glaser J., 2002, Impact of evaluation-based funding on the production of scientific knowledge: What to worry about, and how to find out, Van Noorden Richard, 2010, NATURE, V465, P864 Zuckerman H., 1978, Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, Whitley R., 2007, The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems, Whitley R., 2000, The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Wouters Paul, 2012, Users, narcissism and control - tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21stcentury, Ball R, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V66, P561 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Star SL, 1996, INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, V7, P111 Schimank U, 2005, MINERVA, V43, P361 Slaughter S., 1997, Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University, Mcnay I., 1998, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, V2, P19 KNAW, 2010, Quality assessment in the design and engineering disciplines, Hansson J., 2012, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Priem Jason, 2010, VanderMeulen BJR, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICSProceedings of the Erasmus Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies, MAY 21-24, 1996, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, V38, P87 Moore W. J., 2002, Productivity effects of research assessment exercises, Halsey A. H., 1995, Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic professions in the twentieth century, Whitley R., 2010, Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation, P3 Clackson T., 2009, ACS Chemical Biology, V4, P311 Hazelkorn E, 2011, RANKINGS AND THE RESHAPING OF HIGHER EDUCATION: THE BATTLE FOR WORLD-CLASS EXCELLENCE, P1 Glaser J., 2010, Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation, P357 HARGENS LL, 1990, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, V19, P205 van Dalen Hendrik P., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1282 Rafols Ismael, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P1262 Aksnes Dag W., 2009, RESEARCH POLICY, V38, P895 Stensaker B., 2011, Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power, Klandermans P., 2009, Het sturen van wetenschap: Sociale wetenschappen in bedrijf, Acuna Daniel E., 2012, NATURE, V489, P201 2011, Groth P., 2010, Information Services & Use, V30, Harzing A.-W., 2010, The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis, Woolgar S., 2002, European Association for the Study of Science and Technology Conference, July 31-August 3, 2002, York, UK, Strathern Marylin, 2000, Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, Georghiou L., 2000, Impact of the Research Assessment Exercise and the future of quality assurance in the light of changes in the research landscape, Sonuga-Barke Edmund J. S., 2012, JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, V53, P915 Burrows Roger, 2012, SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V60, P355 Buela-Casal Gualberto, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P281 Shore Cris, 2008, ANTHROPOLOGICAL THEORY, V8, P278 ======================================================================== *Record 37 of 43. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300021 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Publishing Perspective on Bibliometrics Authors: Kamalski, J; Plume, A; Amin, M Author Full Names: Kamalski, Judith; Plume, Andrew; Amin, Mayur Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 385-396; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: INDEXES; IMPACT Addresses: [Plume, Andrew] Elsevier, Res & Acad Relat, Scientometr & Market Anal, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Plume, Andrew] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England. [Plume, Andrew] Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Amin, Mayur] Elsevier, Res & Acad Relat, Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E-mail Addresses: J.Kamalski at elsevier.com; a.plume at elsevier.com; m.amin at elsevier.com Cited Reference Count: 28 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300021 Cited References: Glanzel W, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P69 Moed Henk F., 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P929 COUNTER, 2012, Usage-based measures of journal impact and quality, Lozano G. A., 2012, The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers citations in the digital age, Tijssen Robert J. W., 2011, NATURE, V473, P154 Price D. J. de Solla, 1961, Science Since Babylon, Moed Henk F., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P211 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Gonzalez-Pereira Borja, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P379 Moed Henk F., 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P265 Braun Tibor, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P207 Colledge L, 2010, Serials, V23, P215 Mabe M., 2000, Perspectives in Publishing, V1, Garfield Eugene, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, V3, P173 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Moed Henk F., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P367 Kamalski Judith, 2012, CITIES, V29, PS3 Corbyn Z., 2009, Times Higher Education, Jones Thomas, 2011, WORLD NEUROSURGERY, V76, P36 Elsevier, 2011, International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base-2011, He Tianwei, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P571 Reedijk Jan, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P183 Kamalski J., 2010, Research Trends, P19 De Solla Price D., 1963, Little Science, Big Science, Bernal J. D., 1939, The social function of science, Huggett S, 2012, Editor's Update, P36 Plume A., 2011, Research Assessment, Royal Society, 2011, Knowledge, Networks & Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339680800004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Academic rankings between the "republic of science" and "new public management" Authors: Osterloh, M; Frey, BS Author Full Names: Osterloh, Margit; Frey, Bruno S. Edited by: Lanteri A; Vromen J Source: ECONOMICS OF ECONOMISTS: INSTITUTIONAL SETTING, INDIVIDUAL INCENTIVES, AND FUTURE PROSPECTS, 77-103; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: BASIC SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; SELF-DETERMINATION; SIMPLE ECONOMICS; IMPACT FACTOR; HIDDEN COSTS; GONE WILD; PERFORMANCE Addresses: [Osterloh, Margit] Univ Zurich, Dept Business Adm, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland. [Osterloh, Margit] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England. [Frey, Bruno S.] Univ Zurich, Dept Econ, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland. Cited Reference Count: 180 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, THE PITT BUILDING, TRUMPINGTON ST, CAMBRIDGE CB2 1RP, CAMBS, ENGLAND ISBN: 978-1-107-01570-8 Book DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139059145 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: BA9PP Unique ID: WOS:000339680800004 Cited References: Rothwell PM, 2000, BRAIN, V123, P1964 Khurana R, 2007, FROM HIGHER AIMS TO HIRED HANDS: THE SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN BUSINESS SCHOOLS AND THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE OF MANAGEMENT AS A PROFESSION, P1 Campbell P., 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P5 Buchstein H., 2009, Demokratie und Lotterie, Gittelman M, 2003, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V49, P366 Bush V., 1945, ''Science: The endless frontier.'' A report to the president by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, Frey BS, 2001, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, V15, P589 Abernethy MA, 1997, ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, V22, P233 GRIFFIN D, 1992, COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, V24, P411 Ultee M., 1987, Seventeenth Century, V2, P95 Gillies D., 2008, How Should Research Be Organised?, Fong Eric A., 2007, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V33, P161 Deci EL, 1999, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V125, P627 Buchstein H., 2007, Redescription, V11, P178 Starbuck W. H., 2009, Scandinavian Journal of Management, V25, P225 SIMON HA, 1985, AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, V79, P293 GILLILAND SW, 1992, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, V77, P672 Garfield E, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P1765 SCHREYOGG G, 1987, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V12, P91 Ursprung H. W., 2006, Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, V227, P187 Simkin M. V., 2005, Annals of Improbable Research, V11, P24 Haney W. M, 2002, Education Week, P56 Bornmann Lutz, 2009, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V22, P117 Goodall AH, 2009, SOCRATES IN THE BOARDROOM: WHY RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES SHOULD BE LED BY TOP SCHOLARS, P1 Gneezy U, 2000, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V115, P791 Fletcher R. C., 2003, Peer Review in Health Sciences, P62 Gillies Donald, 2005, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, V36, P159 Frey Bruno S., 2010, JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, V13, P1 Falk Armin, 2006, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V96, P1611 Starbuck W. H., 2006, The Production of Knowledge: The Challenge of Social Science Research, Elster J., 1989, Solomonic judgements-Studies in the Limitations of Ratinality, Bornmann L., 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P93 Rinia EJ, 1998, RESEARCH POLICY, V27, P95 Merton R. K., 1973, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, Frey B. S., 2009, International Review of Economics, V56, P333 Espeland Wendy Nelson, 2007, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V113, P1 Schimank U, 2005, MINERVA, V43, P361 Lawrence PA, 2002, NATURE, V415, P835 Bok D., 2003, Universities in the Marketplace: the Commercialization of Higher Education, Oswald Andrew J., 2007, ECONOMICA, V74, P21 Osterloh M, 2000, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V11, P538 Frey BS, 2003, PUBLIC CHOICE, V116, P205 FREY BS, 1992, KYKLOS, V45, P161 Stern S, 2004, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V50, P835 ZUCKERMAN H, 1992, THEORETICAL MEDICINE, V13, P217 Osterloh M., 2010, Analyse und Kritik, V32, P267 Gioia Dennis A., 2002, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V1, P107 Ordonez Lisa D., 2009, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, V23, P6 Prichard C, 1997, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V18, P287 CAMPBELL DT, 1957, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V54, P297 Fehr E, 2004, SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V106, P453 Weingart P, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P117 Fuyuno I, 2006, NATURE, V441, P792 Jimenez-Contreras E, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY, V32, P123 SPANGENBERG JFA, 1990, RESEARCH POLICY, V19, P239 IDEAS, 2008, IDEAS rankings, Stephan PE, 1996, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V34, P1199 Handelsblatt, 2010, Handlesblatt-Ranking schlagt hohe Wellen, OUCHI WG, 1979, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V25, P833 Judge Timothy A., 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V50, P491 Amabile TM, 1996, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V39, P1154 The Thomson Corporation, 2008, ISI web of knowledge journal citation report, Posner Richard A., 2010, JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, V6, P1 Durso TW, 1997, SCIENTIST, V11, P13 Moed H. F., 2007, Science & Public Policy, V34, P575 Rost Katja, 2010, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, V18, P212 Locke Edwin A., 2009, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, V23, P17 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 MINER LE, 1981, SRA-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS, V12, P21 Monastersky R., 2005, Chronicle of Higher Education, V52, PA12 Neckermann S., 2010, Working Paper No. 411, Weibel Antoinette, 2010, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, V20, P387 STAW BM, 1990, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V33, P534 Armstrong JS, 1997, Sci Eng Ethics, V3, P63 Hendriks C. M., 2004, P80 Simonton D. K., 2004, Creativity in science. Chance, logic, genius and zeitgeist, NELSON RR, 1959, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V67, P297 Ehrenberg R. G., 2000, Tuition Rising: Why College Costs So Much, Strathern M., 1966, Cambridge Anthropology, V19, P1 The Thomson Corporation, 2008, ISI web of knowledge essential science indicators, Smith R, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P463 Frost Jetta, 2010, ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, V39, P126 Sokal A. D, 1996, A physicist experiments with cultural studies, Stephan Paula E., 2008, CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, V54, P313 Brook R., 2003, Science Between Evaluation and Innovation: A Conference on Peer Review, P61 Cole S., 1992, Making Science: Between Nature and Society, Albers Soenke, 2009, GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V10, P352 Amabile TM, 1998, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V76, P76 Nelson Richard R., 2006, INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGEConference on Information, Intellectual Property, and Economic Welfare, MAY 15-16, 2006, Turin, ITALY, V15, P903 Butler L, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 16-20, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V32, P143 Abramo Giovanni, 2009, RESEARCH POLICY, V38, P206 GANS JS, 1994, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V8, P165 Frey B. S., 2010, Nature, V465, P871 Clark B. R., 1998, Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organisational pathways of transformation, Tsang Eric W. K., 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V6, P128 Lee Frederic S., 2007, CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V31, P309 Janis I. L, 1972, Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign- Policy-Decisions and Fiascoes, Dahl R., 1989, Democracy and its critics, Hennessey B. A., 1998, American Psychologist, V53, P647 Horrobin DF, 1996, LANCET, V348, P1293 Benz Matthias, 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWAnnual Conference of the Associational-of-German-Speaking Business Economics, JUN, 2003, Zurich, SWITZERLAND, V32, P92 Leibniz G. W, 1931, Samtliche Schriften und Briefe (Akademie-Ausgabe), V1, P569 LINDSEY D, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V22, P313 Van Fleet DD, 2000, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V26, P839 Moed HF, 2002, NATURE, V415, P731 Bhagwat Jui G, 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, V1, P493 FREY BS, 2008, J PSYCHOL, V216, P198 Carson L., 1999, Random Selection in Politics, Heintz B., 2008, Governance von und durch Wissen, P110 Dryzek O., 2002, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Eizenhardt K. M., 1985, Management Science, V31, P134 Wenneras C., 1999, Peer Review in Health Sciences, P79 NICHOLS S, 2006, ED POLICY ANAL ARCH, V14, P1 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 Stokes D.E., 1997, Pasteur's quadrant-Basic science and technological innovation, Butler L, 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P565 Laband DN, 2003, KYKLOS, V56, P161 Donovan C., 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P585 Lazear Edward P., 2007, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V21, P91 Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, HOLMSTROM B, 1991, JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, V7, P24 Mahoney M. J., 1977, Cognitive Therapy and Research, V1, P161 Schweitzer ME, 2004, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V47, P422 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Mudambi Ram, 2007, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V24, P442 Rynes S., 2003, Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications, Roach Michael, 2010, RESEARCH POLICY, V39, P422 Adler R., 2008, Report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS), Fishkin J., 1991, Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform, Ethiraj Sendil K., 2009, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V20, P4 Hargreaves Heap S. P, 2002, Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science, P387 Considine M., 2000, The enterprise university: Power, governance, and reinvention in Australia, Lane Julia, 2010, NATURE, V464, P488 Sorenson O, 2004, RESEARCH POLICY, V33, P1615 Miller CC, 2006, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V49, P425 POLANYI M, 1962, MINERVA, V1, P54 Hamermesh Daniel S., 2007, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, V40, P715 Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2007, Academic Ranking of World Universities, Kuhn T., 1962, The structure of scientific revolutions, Arrow K., 1962, The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, P609 Duxbury N., 1999, Random Justice: On Lotteries and Legal Decision Making, Heilig Julian Vasquez, 2008, EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, V30, P75 Adler Nancy J., 2009, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V8, P72 EARLEY PC, 1989, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, V74, P24 CICCHETTI DV, 1991, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, V14, P119 Holcombe Randall G., 2004, ECON JOURNAL WATCH, V1, P498 Gagne M, 2005, JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, V26, P331 OUCHI WG, 1977, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V22, P95 Habermas Juergen, 2006, COMMUNICATION THEORY, V16, P411 PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, V5, P187 DASGUPTA P, 1994, RESEARCH POLICY, V23, P487 Franzoni C., 2010, Working paper, Singh Gangaram, 2007, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, V16, P319 Perrin B, 1998, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, V19, P367 Kotiaho JS, 1999, NATURE, V400, P307 Willmott H, 2003, STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATIONHigher-Education Close-Up Conference, JUL 06-08, 1998, LANCASTER, ENGLAND, V28, P129 Bedeian AG, 2003, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, V12, P331 Ackermann B. A., 2004, Deliberation Day, Weller A. C., 2001, Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses, Hayek F. A, 1979, Law, Legislation and Liberty, V3, Worrell Dan L., 2009, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V8, P127 Taylor M., 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P17 Frey B. S, 1997, Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation, Campanario JM, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P3 Donoghue F, 2008, LAST PROFESSORS: THE TWILIGHT OF THE HUMANITIES IN THE CORPORATE UNIVERSITY, P1 Nelson RR, 2004, RESEARCH POLICY, V33, P455 Fishkin J., 2005, The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century, P80 Burnheim J., 1985, Is Democracy Possible? The Alternative to Electoral Politics, Brezis E. S., 2007, Science and Public Policy, V2007, P691 GOTTFREDSON SD, 1978, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V33, P920 Van Raan AFJ, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICSConference on Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research, NOV 05-07, 2003, Julich, GERMANY, V62, P133 Swanson EP, 2004, CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, V21, P223 Emery F. E., 1989, Toward Real Democracy and Toward Real Democracy: Further Problems, Dowlen O., 2008, The Political Potential of Sortition: A Study of the Random Selection of Citizens for Public Office, Frey B. S., 2006, Review of International Organizations, V1, P27 Eizenberger R., 1996, American Psychologist, V51, P1153 Bedeian Arthur G., 2004, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V3, P198 Starbuck WH, 2005, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V16, P180 Lawrence PA, 2003, NATURE, V422, P259 Todd P., 2008, Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit., V8, P13 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339323300022 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Science Metrics and Science Policy Authors: Lane, J; Largent, M; Rosen, R Author Full Names: Lane, Julia; Largent, Mark; Rosen, Rebecca Edited by: Cronin B; Sugimoto CR Source: BEYOND BIBLIOMETRICS: HARNESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATORS OF SCHOLARLY IMPACT, 397-411; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: MODELS Addresses: [Lane, Julia; Rosen, Rebecca] Amer Inst Res, Washington, DC 20007 USA. [Lane, Julia] Univ Strasbourg, CNRS, BETA, Strasbourg, France. [Lane, Julia] Natl Sci Fdn, Sci Sci & Innovat Policy Program, Arlington, VA 22230 USA. [Largent, Mark] Michigan State Univ, James Madison Coll, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA. [Rosen, Rebecca] Natl Sci Fdn, AAAS Sci Policy, Arlington, VA 22230 USA. [Rosen, Rebecca] NIH, Bethesda, MD USA. E-mail Addresses: jlane at air.org; Largent at msu.edu; rrosen at air.org Cited Reference Count: 29 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MIT PRESS, FIVE CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 USA ISBN: 978-0-262-52551-0; 978-0-262-02679-6 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BA9ET Unique ID: WOS:000339323300022 Cited References: Lazer David, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P721 Young Neal S., 2008, PLOS MEDICINE, V5, P1418 STAR METRICS, 2012, What is STAR METRICS?, Leydesdorff L., 2010, Beyond universal pragmatics: Essays in the philosophy of communication, P149 COMETS, 2012, About COMETS, Gibbons R, 1998, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V12, P115 Murdick D., 2012, Foresight and Understanding from Scientific Exposition (FUSE), Leydesdorff L., 2008, SciVerse Topics, Bollen J., 2007, Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, CA, Largent Mark A., 2012, REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, V29, P431 Lambe P, 2007, ORGANISING KNOWLEDGE:TAXONOMIES, KNOWLEDGE AND ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, P1 Lane Julia, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P678 Cummings Jonathon N., 2007, RESEARCH POLICY, V36, P1620 National Science and Technology Council, 2009, Harnessing the power of digital data for science and society, Borner Katy, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P161 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Paley W. B., 2012, SEED and Discover Magazines, Academic Ranking of World Universities, 2012, Wikipedia, Science of Science Policy, 2008, The : A Federal Research Roadmap, Lane J., 2009, Working Paper No. 52, Rat fur Sozial und Wissenschafts Daten, Hemminger B. H., 2010, First Monday, V15, Zhou M., 2008, Molecular Pain, V4, P53 Marburger J. H., 2011, P9 Karr A., 2011, Significance, V8, P116 Ioannidis JPA, 2005, PLOS MEDICINE, V2, P696 Kiesler S., 2007, Modeling productive climates for virtual research collaborations [Powerpoint], KERR S, 1975, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V18, P769 Blei David M., 2012, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, V55, P77 Haeussler C., 2009, General and specific information sharing among academic scientists, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340093000034 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Physics in Cuba from the Perspective of Bibliometrics Authors: Marx, W; Cardona, M Author Full Names: Marx, Werner; Cardona, Manuel Edited by: Baracca A; Renn J; Wendt H Source: HISTORY OF PHYSICS IN CUBA, 304 423-437; 10.1007/978-94-017-8041-4_33 2014 Book Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter Addresses: [Marx, Werner] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Informat Serv, Stuttgart, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Stuttgart, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Univ Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Univ Konstanz, Constance, Germany. [Cardona, Manuel] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA. E-mail Addresses: w.marx at fkf.mpg.de; M.Cardona at fkf.mpg.de Cited Reference Count: 7 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, PO BOX 17, 3300 AA DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0068-0346 ISBN: 978-94-017-8041-4; 978-94-017-8040-7 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8041-4 Web of Science Categories: History & Philosophy Of Science Research Areas: History & Philosophy of Science IDS Number: BB0CA Unique ID: WOS:000340093000034 Cited References: Ruiz JAA, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P161 Van Noorden R., 2010, Nature, V465, P870 Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Van Noorden Richard, 2010, NATURE, V465, P864 Abbott Alison, 2010, NATURE, V465, P860 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 BOSCH FX, 1995, JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, V87, P796 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000339933800008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Performance analysis of scientific researchers in biomedicine Authors: Gamba, G Author Full Names: Gamba, Gerardo Source: REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA, 65 (5):420-435; SEP-OCT 2013 Language: Spanish Document Type: Article Author Keywords: h-index, Impact factor, Publications, Author, Citation KeyWords Plus: IMPACT FACTOR Abstract: Background. There is no data about the performance of scientific researchers in biomedicine in our environment that can be use by individual subjects to compare their execution with their pairs. Material and methods. Using the Scopus browser the following data from 115 scientific researchers in biomedicine were obtained: actual institution, number of articles published, place on each article within the author list as first, last or unique author, total number of citations, percentage of citations due to the most cited paper, and h-index. Results were analyzed with descriptive statistics and simple lineal regressions. Results. Most of scientific researches in the sample are from the National Institutes of the Health Ministry or some of the research institutes or faculties at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Total number of publications was < 50 in 26%, from 50 to 100 in 36.5%, from 101 to 150 in 18.2%, from 151 to 200 in 9.5%, and more than 200 papers in 9.5%. The researcher was considered to be the main author, by being the first, the last or the unique author, from the 22 to 91% of the papers, with 75% being main author in more than 50% of the manuscripts. Total citations varied from 240 to 10,866. There is a significant correlation between the number of papers and citations, with R2 of 0.46. In the most cited paper, the researchers were considered the main author in 43%. The h-index varied from 7 to 57. Eight researchers had h-index of less than 10. Most are between 11 and 20, 25% are between 21 and 0 and only 10.4% had an h-index of more than 30. There is a significant correlation between number of published papers and h-index, with R2 of 0.57. Conclusions. This work provides an analysis of scientific publications in a sample of 115 scientific researchers in biomedicine in Mexico City, which can be used to compare the productivity of individual subjects with their pairs. Addresses: [Gamba, Gerardo] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Inst Nacl Salud, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico. [Gamba, Gerardo] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Unidad Fisiol Mol, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico. [Gamba, Gerardo] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Biomed, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico. E-mail Addresses: gamba at biomedicas.unam.mx Cited Reference Count: 6 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INST NACIONAL NUTRICION, VASCO DE QUIROZA 15, COLONIA SECCION XVI, TLALPAN, MEXICO 14000 D F, MEXICO ISSN: 0034-8376 Web of Science Categories: Medicine, General & Internal Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine IDS Number: AM5XH Unique ID: WOS:000339933800008 Cited References: Lipsky Peter E., 2007, NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE RHEUMATOLOGY, V3, P189 Siegel Rebecca, 2013, CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, V63, P11 Xu BE, 2000, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, V275, P16795 Wilson FH, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P1107 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Alberts Bruce, 2013, SCIENCE, V340, P787 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340422700008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Linked-Data-Driven and Semantically-Enabled Journal Portal for Scientometrics Authors: Hu, Y; Janowicz, K; McKenzie, G; Sengupta, K; Hitzler, P Author Full Names: Hu, Yingjie; Janowicz, Krzysztof; McKenzie, Grant; Sengupta, Kunal; Hitzler, Pascal Edited by: Alani H; Kagal L; Fokoue A; Groth P; Biemann C; Parreira JX; Aroyo L; Noy N; Welty C; Janowicz K Source: SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2013, PART II, 8219 114-129; 2013 Book Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 12th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) Conference Date: OCT 21-25, 2013 Conference Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA Conference Sponsors: Bing, Fluid Operat, Microsoft Res, PreviousNext, IBM Res, Ontotext, Yahoo, IOS Press, OpenLink Software KeyWords Plus: INDEX; WEB Abstract: The Semantic Web journal by IOS Press follows a unique open and transparent process during which each submitted manuscript is available online together with the full history of its successive decision statuses, assigned editors, solicited and voluntary reviewers, their full text reviews, and in many cases also the authors' response letters. Combined with a highly-customized, Drupal-based journal management system, this provides the journal with semantically rich manuscript time lines and networked data about authors, reviewers, and editors. These data are now exposed using a SPARQL endpoint, an extended Bibo ontology, and a modular Linked Data portal that provides interactive scientometrics based on established and new analysis methods. The portal can be customized for other journals as well. Addresses: [Hu, Yingjie; Janowicz, Krzysztof; McKenzie, Grant] Univ Calif, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA. Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 0302-9743 ISBN: 978-3-642-41338-4; 978-3-642-41337-7 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods Research Areas: Computer Science IDS Number: BB0MJ Unique ID: WOS:000340422700008 Cited References: Glenisson P, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1548 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 D'Arcus B., 2009, Bibliographic Ontology Specification, Hitzler P., 2013, Semantic Web, V4, P117 Hood WW, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V52, P291 Kessler C., 2012, GIScience 2012, V7478, P102 Tang J., 2008, Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '08, P990 Stadler C., 2012, Semantic Web, V3, P333 Brody T., 2007, CTWatch Quarterly, V3, Shotton David, 2009, PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, V5, Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P547 Auer Soeren, 2007, SEMANTIC WEB, PROCEEDINGS6th International Semantic Web Conference/2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007/ASWC 2007), NOV 11-15, 2007, Busan, SOUTH KOREA, V4825, P722 Braun Tibor, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P169 Zhou D., 2006, Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P248 Janowicz Krzysztof, 2012, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V25, P48 Wang X., 2006, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P424 Blei DM, 2003, JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH18th International Conference on Machine Learning, JUN 28-JUL 01, 2001, WILLIAMSTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, V3, P993 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340557500016 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Ranking Cricket Teams through Runs and Wickets Authors: Daud, A; Muhammad, F Author Full Names: Daud, Ali; Muhammad, Faqir Edited by: Yoshida T; Kou G; Skowron A; Cao J; Hacid H; Zhong N Source: ACTIVE MEDIA TECHNOLOGY, AMT 2013, 8210 156-165; 2013 Book Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 9th International Conference on Active Media Technology (AMT) Conference Date: OCT 29-31, 2013 Conference Location: Maebashi, JAPAN Conference Sponsors: Web Intelligence Consortium, IEEE Computat Intelligence Soc Task Force Brain Informat, Maebashi Inst Technol Author Keywords: indexing, ranking, cricket teams, runs and wickets KeyWords Plus: INDEX Abstract: Teams are ranked to show their authority over each other. The International Cricket Council (ICC) ranks the cricket teams using an ad-hoc points system entirely based on the winning and losing of matches. In this paper, adoptions of PageRank and h-index are proposed for ranking teams to overcome the weakness of ICC ad-hoc point system. The intuition is to get more points for a team winning from a stronger team than winning from a weaker team by considering the number of runs and wickets also in addition to just winning and losing matches. The results show that proposed ranking methods provide quite promising insights of one day and test team rankings. Addresses: [Daud, Ali] IIU, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. E-mail Addresses: ali.daud at iiu.edu.pk; aioufsd at yahoo.com Cited Reference Count: 13 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 0302-9743 ISBN: 978-3-319-02750-0; 978-3-319-02749-4 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods Research Areas: Computer Science IDS Number: BB0OY Unique ID: WOS:000340557500016 Cited References: Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Borooah V.K., 2010, Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, V6, Haveliwala T.H., 2002, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2002, New York, P517 Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P131 Mukherjee Satyam, 2012, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V391, P6066 Bracewell P.J., 2009, Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, V5, P1 Manaskasemsak Bundit, 2011, INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, V14, P133 Xing W., 2004, Proceedings. Second Annual Conference on Communication Networks and Services ResearchProceedings. Second Annual Conference on Communication Networks and Services Research, 19-21 May 2004, Fredericton, NB, Canada, Bailey M.J., 2004, Economics, Management and Optimization in Sport, V11, P185 Page L., 1998, Technical report, Ivn G., 2011, Biofinformatics, V27, P405 Burrell Q.L., Journal of Informetrics, V1, P16 Duch Jordi, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569800011 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Clustering scientific documents with topic modeling Authors: Yau, CK; Porter, A; Newman, N; Suominen, A Author Full Names: Yau, Chyi-Kwei; Porter, Alan; Newman, Nils; Suominen, Arho Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (3):767-786; 10.1007/s11192-014-1321-8 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Topic modeling, Text analysis, Atent dirichlet allocation KeyWords Plus: BIBLIOMETRICS; TECHNOLOGIES Abstract: Topic modeling is a type of statistical model for discovering the latent "topics'' that occur in a collection of documents through machine learning. Currently, latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) is a popular and common modeling approach. In this paper, we investigate methods, including LDA and its extensions, for separating a set of scientific publications into several clusters. To evaluate the results, we generate a collection of documents that contain academic papers from several different fields and see whether papers in the same field will be clustered together. We explore potential scientometric applications of such text analysis capabilities. Addresses: [Yau, Chyi-Kwei; Porter, Alan] Georgia Tech, Technol Policy & Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA. [Porter, Alan] Search Technol Inc, Norcross, GA 30992 USA. [Newman, Nils] IISC, Atlanta, GA 30357 USA. [Newman, Nils] Univ Maastricht, UNU MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands. [Suominen, Arho] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Turku 20521, Finland. E-mail Addresses: arho.suominen at vtt.fi Funding Acknowledgement: US National Science Foundation (NSF) [1064146]; Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation Funding Text: We acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation (NSF - Award #1064146). The findings and observations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. Arho Suominen also acknowledges the support from the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (Project: "Co-evolution of knowledge creation systems and innovation pipelines (CEK)''). Cited Reference Count: 29 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN4PJ Unique ID: WOS:000340569800011 Cited References: Blei DM, 2003, JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH18th International Conference on Machine Learning, JUN 28-JUL 01, 2001, WILLIAMSTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, V3, P993 Wei X., 2006, Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Suominen Arho, 2013, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V25, P687 McCallum AC, 2002, MALLET: a machine learning for language toolkit, Daim Tugrul U., 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V73, P981 Smola A., 2010, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, V3, Blei D., 2004, V16, Drost I., 2010, Apache mahout, Blei David M., 2007, ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, V1, P17 Yan E., 2012, Scientometrics, P1 Blei D., 2006, V18, P147 Teh Yee Whye, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, V101, P1566 Ni Chaoqun, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P1161 Steyvers M., 2004, Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, P306 Blei D.M., 2006, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Blei D. M., 2009, Text mining: Classification, clustering, and applications, P71 Zhang Yi, 2014, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V85, P26 Ferrara A., 2012, Scientometrics, V121, Grun B., 2011, Journal of Statistical Software, V40, P130 Nallapati R., 2007, 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, 2007. ICDM Workshops 2007, P349 Glenisson P, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V63, P163 Borgman CL, 2002, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V36, P3 Wang Y., 2009, Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management, Griffiths TL, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5228 Hofmann T, 1999, SIGIR'99: PROCEEDINGS OF 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL22nd International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, AUG, 1999, BERKELEY, CA, P50 Wallach H., 2006, In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S., Newman N.C., 2012, Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12, Feldman R., 2006, The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data, Zhai K., 2012, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, =================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340854600004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Normal tissue studies in radiation oncology: A systematic review of highly cited articles and citation patterns Authors: Nieder, C; Andratschke, NH; Grosu, AL Author Full Names: Nieder, Carsten; Andratschke, Nicolaus H.; Grosu, Anca L. Source: ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 8 (3):972-976; 10.3892/ol.2014.2252 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: radiotherapy, radiation oncology, normal tissue, side effects, citation, research evaluation KeyWords Plus: CELL LUNG-CANCER; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; PROSTATE-CANCER; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; RISK; TOXICITY; INJURY; IRRADIATION; FIBROSIS Abstract: Radiation therapy is one of the cornerstones of modern multidisciplinary cancer treatment. Normal tissue tolerance is critical as radiation-induced side effects may compromise organ function and quality of life. The importance of normal tissue research is reflected by the large number of scientific articles, which have been published between 2006 and 2010. The present study identified important areas of research as well as seminal publications. The article citation rate is among the potential indicators of scientific impact. Highly cited articles, arbitrarily defined as those with >= 15 citations, were identified via a systematic search of the citation database, Scopus. Up to 608 articles per.year were published between 2006 and 2010, however, <10% of publications in each year accumulated >= 15 citations. This figure is notably low, when compared with other oncology studies. A large variety of preclinical and clinical topics, including toxicity prediction, the dose-volume relationship and radioprotectors, accumulated >= 15 citations. However, clinical prevention or mitigation studies were underrepresented. The following conclusion may be drawn from the present study; despite the improved technology that has resulted in superior dose distribution, clinical prevention or mitigation studies are critical and must receive higher priority, funding and attention. Addresses: [Nieder, Carsten] Nordland Hosp, Dept Oncol & Palliat Med, N-8092 Bodo, Norway. [Nieder, Carsten] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Inst Clin Med, N-9038 Tromso, Norway. [Andratschke, Nicolaus H.] Univ Hosp Rostock, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-18059 Rostock, Germany. [Grosu, Anca L.] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. E-mail Addresses: carsten.nieder at nlsh.no Cited Reference Count: 45 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD, POB 18179, ATHENS, 116 10, GREECE ISSN: 1792-1074 eISSN: 1792-1082 Web of Science Categories: Oncology Research Areas: Oncology IDS Number: AN8LB Unique ID: WOS:000340854600004 Cited References: Soehn Matthias, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS48th Annual Meeting of the American-Society-for-Therapeutic-Radiology-and-Oncology, NOV 05-09, 2006, Philadelphia, PA, V67, P1066 Nieder C, Anticancer Res, P27 Francois Sabine, 2006, STEM CELLS, V24, P1020 Weiss Joseph F., 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, V85, P539 Kong Feng-Ming, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS13th European Cancer Conference (ECCO 13), OCT 30-NOV 03, 2005, Paris, FRANCE, V65, P1075 Kanaan Ziad, 2011, ANNALS OF SURGERY, V253, P619 Michalski Jeff M., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V76, PS123 Kulkarni Abhaya V., 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Citrin Deborah, 2010, ONCOLOGIST, V15, P360 Mangoni M., 2012, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, V107, P308 Shirazi Alireza, 2007, JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, V48, P263 Yuan Xianglin, 2009, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, V27, P3370 Darby Sarah C., 2013, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V368, P987 Nieder C., 2012, STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, V188, P865 Lofdahl Elisabet, 2012, RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V7, Giotopoulos G., 2007, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, V96, P1001 Maraldo M. V., 2013, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, V24, P2113 Yarnold John, 2010, RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, V97, P149 Wazer DE, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V64, P489 Kondziolka Douglas, 2011, STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, V89, P56 Padovani Laetitia, 2012, NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, V8, P578 Bentzen Soren M., 2007, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, V25, P4096 Burri Ryan J., 2008, RADIATION RESEARCH53rd Annual Meeting of the Radiation-Research-Society, NOV 05-08, 2006, Philadelphia, PA, V170, P49 Fiorino Claudio, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V70, P1130 Gulliford Sarah L., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V76, P747 Nieder Carsten, 2007, RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V2, Kirkpatrick John P., 2008, SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V18, P240 Kouvaris John R., 2007, ONCOLOGIST, V12, P738 Young Neal S., 2008, PLOS MEDICINE, V5, P1418 Raabe Annette, 2012, RADIATION ONCOLOGY, V7, Bentzen Soren M., 2006, NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, V6, P702 Nieder C, 2003, ANTICANCER RESEARCH, V23, P4991 Durieux Valerie, 2010, RADIOLOGY, V255, P342 Mayer Ramona, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V70, P1350 Fiorino Claudio, 2009, RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, V93, P153 Bentzen Soren M., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V76, PS3 Nieder Carsten, 2012, CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, V114, P1207 Stringer Michael J., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1377 Clarke Richard E., 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V72, P134 Zhao Weiling, 2009, CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, V16, P130 Braam Petra M., 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, V66, P975 Vinkler P, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P687 Radicchi Filippo, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P17268 Moding Everett J., 2013, NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, V12, P526 Barnett Gillian C., 2009, NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, V9, P134 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569800010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0: can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction? Authors: Ponomarev, IV; Lawton, BK; Williams, DE; Schnell, JD Author Full Names: Ponomarev, Ilya V.; Lawton, Brian K.; Williams, Duane E.; Schnell, Joshua D. Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (3):755-765; 10.1007/s11192-014-1320-9 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Highly cited papers, Breakthrough paper indicator, Citation trajectories, Interdisciplinarity measures, Rao-Stirling-Porter index, Geographical diversity, Research management, Science policy KeyWords Plus: SCIENCE; DIFFERENTIATION; COLLABORATION; CITATIONS; NETWORKS; JOURNALS; IMPACT; MODEL Abstract: We report progress on new developments in the breakthrough paper indicator, which allows early selection of a small group of publications which may become potential breakthrough candidates based on dynamics of publication citations and certain qualitative characteristics of citations. We used a quantitative approach to identify typical citation patterns of highly cited papers. Based on these analyses, we propose two forecasting models to select groups of breakthrough paper candidates that exceed high citation thresholds five years post-publication. Here we study whether interdisciplinarity in the subject categories or geographical diversity serve as possible measures to improve ranking of breakthrough paper candidates. We found that ranked geographical diversities of known breakthrough papers have equal or better ranks than corresponding citations ranks. This allows us to apply additional filtering for better identifications of breakthrough candidates. We studied several interdisciplinarity indices, including richness, Shannon index, Simpson index, and Rao-Stirling-Porter index. We did not find any correlations between citation ranks and ranked interdisciplinarity indices. Addresses: [Ponomarev, Ilya V.; Williams, Duane E.; Schnell, Joshua D.] Thomson Reuters, Rockville, MD 20850 USA. [Lawton, Brian K.] Redtail Creek Software, Rockville, MD USA. E-mail Addresses: ilyasoft at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 34 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN4PJ Unique ID: WOS:000340569800010 Cited References: Katz JS, 1997, RESEARCH POLICY, V26, P1 KOHN W, 1965, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V140, P1133 DISTEL RJ, 1987, CELL, V49, P835 Porter Alan L., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P117 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P87 GELLER NL, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P3 Edwards R. G., 1978, Lancet, V312, P366 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 GARFIELD E, 1992, THEORETICAL MEDICINE, V13, P117 AVERSA ES, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P383 HECK RF, 1968, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, V90, P5518 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 GARFIELD E, 1990, CURRENT CONTENTS, V11, P3 Radhakrishna Rao C., 1982, Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002), V44, P1 Rafols Ismael, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P263 Chen Chaomei, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P191 ABRAHAMS E, 1979, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V42, P673 PENDLEBURY D, 1989, SCIENTIST, V3, P14 Ponomarev Ilya V., 2014, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V81, P49 KATZ JS, 1994, SCIENTOMETRICS, V31, P31 Nalimov V.V., 1969, Naukometriya. Izuchenie nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa (Scientometrics. Study of science as an information process.), Frenken K., 2005, Papers in regional science, V89, P351 Conover W. J., 1999, Practical nonparametric statistics, van Raan AFJ, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P347 Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 Glanzel W, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P571 Novoselov KS, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P666 WEINBERG S, 1967, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V19, P1264 Rousseau L., 1990, Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 ======================================================================== *Record 9 of 29. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569800003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Literature-related discovery: common factors for Parkinson's Disease and Crohn's Disease Authors: Kostoff, RN Author Full Names: Kostoff, Ronald N. Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (3):623-657; 10.1007/s11192-014-1298-3 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Literature-related discovery, Text mining, Scientometrics, Parkinson's Disease, Crohn's Disease, Neurodegeneration, Autoimmunity, Inflammation KeyWords Plus: POTENTIAL TREATMENTS; KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY; MEDICAL LITERATURES; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; THERAPIES; NECROSIS; COLITIS; CANCER Abstract: Literature-related discovery (LRD) is the linking of two or more literature concepts that have heretofore not been linked (i.e., disjoint), in order to produce novel, interesting, and intelligible knowledge (i.e., potential discovery). The mainstream software for assisting LRD is Arrowsmith. It uses text-based linkage to connect two disjoint literatures, and it generates intermediate linking literatures by matching Title phrases from two disjoint literatures (literatures that do not share common records). Arrowsmith then prioritizes these linking phrases through a series of text-based filters. The present study examines citation-based linkage in addition to text-based linkage to link disjoint literatures through a process called bibliographic coupling. Two disjoint literatures were selected for the demonstration: Parkinson's Disease (PD) (neurodegeneration) and Crohn's Disease (CD) (autoimmune). Three cases were examined: (1) matching phrases in records with no shared references (text-based linkage only); (2) shared references in records with no matching phrases (citation-based linkage only); (3) matching phrases in records with shared references (text-based and citation-based linkages). In addition, the main themes in the body of shared references were examined through grouping techniques to identify the common themes between the two literatures. All the high-level concepts in the Case 1) records could be found in Case 3) records Some new concepts (at the sub-set level of the main themes) not found in the Case 3) records were identified in the Case 2) records. The synergy of matching phrases and shared references provides a strong prioritization to the selection of promising matching phrases as discovery mechanisms. There were three major themes that unified the PD and CD literatures: Genetics; Neuroimmunology; Cell Death. However, these themes are not completely independent. For example, there are genetic determinants of the inflammatory response. Naturally occurring genetic variants in important inflammatory mediators such as TNF-alpha appear to alter inflammatory responses in numerous experimental and a few clinical models of inflammation. Additionally, there is a strong link between neuroimmunology and cell death. In PD, for example, neuroinflammatory processes that are mediated by activated glial and peripheral immune cells might eventually lead to dopaminergic cell death and subsequent disease progression. Addresses: [Kostoff, Ronald N.] Mitre Corp, Bedford, MA 01730 USA. E-mail Addresses: ronald.kostoff at pubpolicy.gatech.edu Funding Acknowledgement: MITRE Funding Text: This project was supported by MITRE internal research funding. Cited Reference Count: 79 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN4PJ Unique ID: WOS:000340569800003 Cited References: Jankovic Joseph, 2012, CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, V25, P433 Wren JD, 2004, BIOINFORMATICS, V20, P389 SWANSON DR, 1988, PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, V31, P526 Osman Nadia, 2008, DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, V53, P2464 Dreiseitel Andrea, 2009, PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, V59, P306 Cao MD, 2005, AI 2005: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE18th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DEC 05-09, 2005, Sydney, AUSTRALIA, V3809, P143 Miller Christopher M., 2012, SLEEP, V35, P279 Boyack Kevin W., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2389 Lin CC, 1996, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, V24, P31 Sarkar Indra Neil, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, V19, P249 Altorjay I., 2008, Crohn's Disease: Etiology, pathogenesis and interventions, Franchi Luigi, 2009, IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, V227, P106 Kostoff Ronald N., 2008, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V75, P165 Swanson Don R., 2008, MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, V71, P178 Calado P, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P208 Pestka JJ, 2004, TOXICOLOGY LETTERSWorkshop on Trichothecenes with a Special Focus on DON, SEP 10-12, 2003, Dublin, IRELAND, V153, P61 Paris Irmgard, 2009, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, V284, P13306 Fink SL, 2005, INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, V73, P1907 Karypis G, 2010, CLUTO-A clustering toolkit, Couto Thierson, 2006, OPENING INFORMATION HORIZONS6th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), JUN 11-15, 2006, Chapel Hill, NC, P75 Scheinfeld N, 2004, The Journal of dermatological treatment, V15, P280 Torvik Vetle I., 2007, BIOINFORMATICS, V23, P1658 Akobeng A. K., 2008, ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, V93, P787 2009, Crohns Disease: Treatment of Crohns disease, biological therapy for inflammatory bowel disease, Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, Ulcerative colitis, Capsule endoscopy, Biancone Livia, 2007, NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, V4, P78 Lees Andrew J., 2009, LANCET, V373, P2055 Smalheiser NR, 2005, DISCOVERY SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS8th International Conference on Discovery Science, OCT 08-11, 2005, Singapore, SINGAPORE, V3735, P26 HIGGINS CF, 1992, TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, V17, P18 Baumgart Daniel C., 2012, LANCET, V380, P1590 Liu Xinhai, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1105 Smalheiser NR, 1996, NEUROLOGY, V47, P809 Jacobi A., 2006, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, V20, P1171 Cheng Yinxia, 2008, NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, V441, P16 Panes Julian, 2007, DRUGS, V67, P2511 Kostoff Ronald N., 2009, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V43, P241 LAYTON DW, 1995, CARCINOGENESIS, V16, P39 Liu Xinhai, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V91, P473 Maresca Marc, 2008, TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, V228, P84 Shibata Naoki, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P571 Lang A. E., 2007, Cecil textbook of medicine, Forte Angelo, 2008, ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, V79, P261 Srinivasan P, 2004, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V55, P396 Islam Zahidul, 2008, TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V105, P142 SWANSON DR, 1987, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V38, P228 Caprilli R., 2008, DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, V40, P709 Louis Elan D., 2008, NEUROTOXICOLOGY, V29, P294 Janssens F., 2006, SCit2006, Current research in information sciences and technologies: Multidisciplinary approaches to global information systems, VI, P615 Kostoff Ronald N., 2012, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V79, P789 Janssens Frizo, 2009, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V45, P683 Lang Anthony E., 2009, NEUROLOGY, V72, PS39 Latella G., 2008, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, V38, P410 Kostoff Ronald N., 2008, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V75, P239 Olanow C. Warren, 2009, NEUROLOGY, V72, PS1 SCHIMINO.S, 1971, INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL, V6, P417 Shenghuo Zhu, 2007, Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'07), New York, NY, P487 Wang J, 2002, JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, V50, P4183 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Kostoff Ronald N., 2008, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V75, P226 MARTYN J, 1964, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V20, P236 Ahlskog J. E, 2005, The Parkinson's Disease treatment book: Partnering with your doctor to get the most from your medications, Pahnke Jens, 2009, NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, V33, P1099 SWANSON DR, 1990, PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, V33, P157 Jarneving Bo, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P338 Annese V., 2006, WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, V12, P3636 Pinton Philippe, 2009, TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, V237, P41 Janssens F, 2007, Clustering of scientific fields by integrating text mining and bibliometrics, Huang Shuiqing, 2012, ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, V64, P423 Glanzel W, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P195 Kostoff R. N., 2010, DTIC Technical Report Number ADA525269, Baumgart Daniel C., 2009, DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, V106, P123 Swanson DR, 2001, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V52, P797 Wilkins Thad, 2011, AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, V84, P1365 Poewe Werner, 2009, NEUROLOGY, V72, PS65 Sen S. K., 1983, Annals of Library Science and Documentation, V30, P78 Calado P, 2003, ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V21, P42 Shtilbans Alexander, 2012, CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, V25, P460 Janssens Frizo, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS11th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 25-27, 2007, Madrid, SPAIN, V75, P607 Schapira A. H., 2009, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, V16, P1090 McCoy Melissa K., 2008, MOLECULAR THERAPY, V16, P1572 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *Record 13 of 29. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340693500028 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Double power laws, fractals and self-similarity Authors: Pinto, CMA; Lopes, AM; Machado, JAT Author Full Names: Pinto, Carla M. A.; Lopes, A. Mendes; Machado, J. A. Tenreiro Source: APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 38 (15-16):4019-4026; SI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.01.012 AUG 1 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Double power laws, PL coefficient, Fractals, Correlation dimension KeyWords Plus: FOREST-FIRE MODEL; ORGANIZED CRITICALITY; INCOME-DISTRIBUTION; ZIPFS LAW; PARETO; BEHAVIOR Abstract: Power law (PL) distributions have been largely reported in the modeling of distinct real phenomena and have been associated with fractal structures and self-similar systems. In this paper, we analyze real data that follows a PL and a double PL behavior and verify the relation between the PL coefficient and the capacity dimension of known fractals. It is to be proved a method that translates PLs coefficients into capacity dimension of fractals of any real data. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Pinto, Carla M. A.] Univ Porto, Polytech Porto, Sch Engn, P-4200072 Oporto, Portugal. [Pinto, Carla M. A.] Univ Porto, Ctr Matemat, P-4200072 Oporto, Portugal. [Lopes, A. Mendes] Univ Porto, UISPA, IDMEC, Polo FEUP Fac Engn, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal. [Machado, J. A. Tenreiro] Polytech Porto, Sch Engn, Dept Elect Engn, P-4200072 Oporto, Portugal. E-mail Addresses: cpinto at fc.up.pt; aml at fe.up.pt; jtm at isep.ipp.pt Cited Reference Count: 46 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA ISSN: 0307-904X eISSN: 1872-8480 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Multidisciplinary; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Mechanics Research Areas: Engineering; Mathematics; Mechanics IDS Number: AN6GR Unique ID: WOS:000340693500028 Cited References: Song WG, 2001, CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, V46, P1134 Malamud BD, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1840 BAK P, 1990, PHYSICS LETTERS A, V147, P297 Ricotta C, 1999, ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, V119, P73 Han D. D., 2011, EPL, V94, MANDELBR.B, 1967, SCIENCE, V156, P636 Ma D., 2009, NATURE MATERIALS, V8, P30 Adamic L.A., 2000, J. Electron. Com, V1, P512 Gabaix X, 1999, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW111th Annual Meeting of the American-Economic-Association, JAN 03-05, 1999, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, V89, P129 Chami Figueira F., 2011, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V390, P689 Mandelbrot B.B., 1982, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, RICHARDSON LF, 1948, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, V43, P523 DROSSEL B, 1992, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V69, P1629 Toda Alexis Akira, 2012, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, V84, P364 2005, Internet Math., V2, P525 Pinto Carla M. A., 2012, COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, V17, P3558 Zanette DH, 2001, PHYSICA AIUPAP International Conference on New Trends in the Fractal Aspects of Complex Systems, OCT 16-20, 2000, MACEIO AL, BRAZIL, V295, P1 Johnson N.F., 2006, arXiv:physics/0605035v1, Gabaix Xavier, 2009, ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, V1, P255 Estoup J.B., 1916, Gammes Stenographiques, Auerbach Felix, 1913, PETERMANNS MITTEILUNGEN, V59, P74 Newman MEJ, 2005, CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS, V46, P323 Sornette D., 2003, Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences, Richardson L.F., 1960, Statistics of Deadly Quarrels, Zopf G., 1932, Selective Studies and the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language, Davis DR, 2002, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V92, P1269 Roberts DC, 1998, FRACTALS-COMPLEX GEOMETRY PATTERNS AND SCALING IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, V6, P351 Song WG, 2003, FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, V38, P453 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Camilo Bohorquez Juan, 2009, NATURE, V462, P911 Pareto V., 1896, Cours d'economie politique, Gutenberg B., 1944, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., V34, P185 Weiguoa S., 2006, Ecol. Model., V196, P527 Reed WJ, 2001, ECONOMICS LETTERS, V74, P15 Carson M., 1989, Phys. Rev. A, V40, P6470 Mandelbrot BB, 1999, MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCER, V21, P18 Li W., References on Zipfs law, Brown JH, 2002, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V357, P619 HARBUS F, 1973, PHYSICAL REVIEW B, V8, P2268 MANDELBROT B, 1960, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, V1, P79 Clauset Aaron, 2007, JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, V51, P58 Rasband S.N., 1990, Chaotic Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems, P71 Gopikrishnan P, 1999, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V60, P5305 Zipf G. K., 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least-Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology, Sornette D, 2009, Int. J. Terraspace Sci. Eng., V2, P1 Lotka A.J., 1926, J. Washington Acad. Sci., V16, P317 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *Record 16 of 29. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340861100011 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: BIBLIOGRAPHIC COMMENTS ON THE NEW EDITION OF THE TWO SOURCES OF MORALITY AND RELIGION BY HENRI BERGSON IN UNIVERSITY PRESSES OF FRANCE (2012) Authors: Urdampilleta, AC Author Full Names: Cortina Urdampilleta, Alvaro Source: PENSAMIENTO, 70 (263):431-435; MAY-AUG 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Editorial Material Addresses: Univ Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile. Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: CENT LOYOLA ESTUD COMUN SOC, PABLO ARANDA 3, 6 MADRID, SPAIN ISSN: 0031-4749 Web of Science Categories: Philosophy Research Areas: Philosophy IDS Number: AN8NO Unique ID: WOS:000340861100011 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000328649000004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries Authors: Aring;strom, F; Hansson, J Author Full Names: Astrom, Fredrik; Hansson, Joacim Source: JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 45 (4):316-322; 10.1177/0961000612456867 DEC 2013 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Academic libraries, bibliometrics, profession, research evaluation, role of libraries, librarianship KeyWords Plus: AUTHOR COCITATION Abstract: This article discusses potential consequences of implementing bibliometrics as an institutionalized practice in academic libraries. Results are reported from a survey among libraries in Sweden with organized bibliometric activities. Incorporating bibliometric activities is one way of redefining and widening the role of the library. Implementation of bibliometric practice is motivated by ambitions to provide more complete scholarly communication-related services, as well as to increase the visibility and status of libraries. Underlying reasons are professional competencies such as metadata and bibliographic database management; and bibliometrics being strong within library and information science. Incorporating bibliometrics in academic libraries is also seen as a way of widening the professional profile of librarianship. The new role should, however, also be considered from the viewpoint of potential changes in how academic libraries are perceived when incorporating a monitoring function through bibliometric analyses of research performance in addition to traditional service-oriented functions. Addresses: [Astrom, Fredrik] Lund Univ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden. [Hansson, Joacim] Linnaeus Univ, S-35195 Vaxjo, Sweden. E-mail Addresses: joacim.hansson at lnu.se Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND ISSN: 0961-0006 eISSN: 1741-6477 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: 275BA Unique ID: WOS:000328649000004 Cited References: PENDLEBURY DA, 2009, WHITEPAPER USING BIB, White HD, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P327 STROM F, 2007, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V58, P947 KISHIDA K, 1995, LIB INFORM SCI, V33, P39 HANSSON J, 2010, LIB IDENTITY ROLE I, NARIN F, 1977, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V12, P35 Nolin Jan, 2010, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V66, P7 WHITE HD, 1989, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V24, P119 BRENNAN P, 2008, 2008 LIB ASS C UNPUB, Vanclay Jerome K., 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P265 Ball R, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V66, P561 Whitley R., 2007, The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems, Wilson CS, 1999, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V34, P107 AYRIS P, 2011, LIBER Q, V20, P332 SCHREIBER T, 2006, BIBLIOTEKARERNE PROF, Nicholson S, 2003, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND LIBRARIES, V22, P146 CARLSSON H, 2008, INVENTERING BIBLIOME, Jimenez-Contreras E, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P198 DIKEMAN RK, 1975, PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V12, P55 WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 GERRITSMA W, 2010, STI C, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340560500038 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Highlights of Library Data Models in the Era of Linked Open Data Authors: Zapounidou, S; Sfakakis, M; Papatheodorou, C Author Full Names: Zapounidou, Sofia; Sfakakis, Michalis; Papatheodorou, Christos Edited by: Garoufallou E; Greenberg J Source: METADATA AND SEMANTICS RESEARCH, MTSR 2013, 390 396-407; 2013 Book Series: Communications in Computer and Information Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 7th Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR) Conference Date: NOV 19-22, 2013 Conference Location: Thessaloniki, GREECE Conference Host: Alexander Technol Educ Inst Thessaloniki Author Keywords: semantic web, library data models, linked data, FRBR, FRBRoo, EDM, BIBFRAME Abstract: Semantic Web technologies and Linked data form a new reference framework for libraries. The library community aims to integrate its data with the Semantic Web and as a result new library data models have been developed. In this context, significant research effort focuses on the alignment between the library models with relevant models developed by other communities in the cultural heritage domain. However there exist several issues concerning the interoperability between all these data models. This paper seeks to contribute in the interoperability of four models, namely FRBR, FRBRoo, EDM and BIBFRAME. It highlights the commonalities and the divergences between them by using a case bibliographic record and by exploring how this record is represented by each one of them. Addresses: [Zapounidou, Sofia; Sfakakis, Michalis; Papatheodorou, Christos] Ionian Univ, Dept Arch & Lib Sci, Corfu, Greece. E-mail Addresses: l12zapo at ionio.gr; sfakakis at ionio.gr; papatheodor at ionio.gr Cited Reference Count: 23 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 1865-0929 ISBN: 978-3-319-03437-9; 978-3-319-03436-2 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BB0OZ Unique ID: WOS:000340560500038 Cited References: IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, 2009, Final Report, BIBFRAME.org, 2013, On BIBFRAME Authority, Library of Congress, MARC Standards, Howarth L. C., 1998, International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR Toronto, October 23-25, Canada, P148 Ridley M., 1998, International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR Toronto, October 23-25, Canada, IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, 1998, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Final Report, W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group, 2011, Report, W3C, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 2009, Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A conceptual model, IFLA Working Group on the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records, 2010, Report, Deliot C., 2012, D5.1 Report on the alignment of library metadata with the European Data Model (EDM) Version 2.0. Report, Europeana Project, 2012, Europeana Semantic Elements Specification Version 3.4.1, W3C, Linked data, Library of Congress, 2011, Report, Europeana Project, 2012, Definition of the Europeana Data Model elements Version 5.2.3, Tennant R., 2004, Library Hi Tech, V22, Isaac A., 2011, Europeana data model primer, MacDougall K., 2012, Report, Stead S., 2013, Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, version 5.1 (draft), Bekiari C., 2013, FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping from FRBRER, FRAD and FRSAD (version 2.0), Doerr M., 2013, Report, HEANEY M, 1995, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND LIBRARIES, V14, P135 Calhoun K., 2006, Report, Library of Congress, 2012, The Library of Congress Announces Modeling Initiative, ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340560500007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Linking Search Results, Bibliographical Ontologies and Linked Open Data Resources Authors: Ricci, F; Belmonte, J; Blumer, E; Schneider, R Author Full Names: Ricci, Fabio; Belmonte, Javier; Blumer, Eliane; Schneider, Rene Edited by: Garoufallou E; Greenberg J Source: METADATA AND SEMANTICS RESEARCH, MTSR 2013, 390 60-66; 2013 Book Series: Communications in Computer and Information Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 7th Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR) Conference Date: NOV 19-22, 2013 Conference Location: Thessaloniki, GREECE Conference Host: Alexander Technol Educ Inst Thessaloniki Author Keywords: Innovative Scientific Search, Metadata Reusability, Linked Open Data Technologies KeyWords Plus: WEB Abstract: This paper describes a lightweight approach to build an environment for scientific research that connects user-selected information resources with domain specific ontologies and the linked open data cloud. Search results are converted into RDF triples to match with ontology subjects in order to derive relevant subjects and to find related documents in external repositories data that are stored in the Linked Open Data Cloud. With the help of this deterministic algorithm for analyzing and ranking search subjects, the explicit searching process, as effectuated by the user, is implicitly supported by the LOD-technology. Addresses: [Ricci, Fabio; Belmonte, Javier; Blumer, Eliane; Schneider, Rene] Haute Ecole Gest Geneve, CH-1227 Carouge, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: fabio.fr.ricci at hesge.ch; javier.belmonte at hesge.ch; eliane.blumer at hesge.ch; rene.schneider at hesge.ch Cited Reference Count: 9 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 1865-0929 ISBN: 978-3-319-03437-9; 978-3-319-03436-2 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BB0OZ Unique ID: WOS:000340560500007 Cited References: Aloia N., 2013, IRCDL 2012, V354, P241 Belmonte Javier, 2012, E-SCIENCE AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT3rd International Symposium on Information Management in a Changing World (IMCW 2012), SEP 19-21, 2012, Ankara, TURKEY, V317, P4 Howarth L.C., 2012, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, V50, BATES MJ, 1989, ONLINE REVIEW, V13, P407 Fensel D, 2011, SEMANTIC WEB SERVICES, P1 Introna L, 2000, COMPUTER, V33, P54 Sheth A., 2012, Synthesis Lectures on Data Management, V4, P1 Auer Soeren, 2007, SEMANTIC WEB, PROCEEDINGS6th International Semantic Web Conference/2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007/ASWC 2007), NOV 11-15, 2007, Busan, SOUTH KOREA, V4825, P722 Miles A., 2005, International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, P3 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340560500025 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Metadata Requirements for Repositories in Health Informatics Research: Evidence from the Analysis of Social Media Citations Authors: Rousidis, D; Garoufallou, E; Balatsoukas, P; Paraskeuopoulos, K; Asderi, S; Koutsomiha, D Author Full Names: Rousidis, Dimitris; Garoufallou, Emmanouel; Balatsoukas, Panos; Paraskeuopoulos, Kostas; Asderi, Stella; Koutsomiha, Damiana Edited by: Garoufallou E; Greenberg J Source: METADATA AND SEMANTICS RESEARCH, MTSR 2013, 390 246-257; 2013 Book Series: Communications in Computer and Information Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 7th Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR) Conference Date: NOV 19-22, 2013 Conference Location: Thessaloniki, GREECE Conference Host: Alexander Technol Educ Inst Thessaloniki Author Keywords: Scholarly communication, Citation Analysis, Digital Library 2.0, Metadata, Search interfaces, Social media, Medical informatics KeyWords Plus: WEB Abstract: Social media have transformed the way modern science is communicated. Although several studies have been focused on the use of social media for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and the measurement of the impact of academic output, we know very little about how academics cite social media in their publications. In order to address this gap, a content analysis was performed on a sample of 629 journal articles in medical informatics. The findings showed the presence of 109 citations to social media resources, the majority of which were blogs and wikis. Social media citations were used more frequently to support the literature review section of articles. However, a fair amount of citations was used in order to document various aspects of the methodology section, such as the data collection and analysis process. The paper concludes with the implications of these findings for metadata design for bibliographic databases (like PubMed and Medline). Addresses: [Rousidis, Dimitris] Univ Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain. Cited Reference Count: 27 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 1865-0929 ISBN: 978-3-319-03437-9; 978-3-319-03436-2 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: BB0OZ Unique ID: WOS:000340560500025 Cited References: Tombros A, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P327 Pedrana A., 2013, JMIR, V15, Gotsis M., 2013, JMIR, V2, Small H., 2012, The International Journal of Digital Curation, V7, P174 Groth P., 2010, Studying Scientific Discourse on the Web using Bibliometrics: A Chemistry Blogging Case Study, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 2012, Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1, Buttcher S., 2010, Information Retrieval: Implementing and evaluating search engines, Mackert M., 2012, Global Telehealth, P93 Krippendorff Klaus, 2004, Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology, Peters I., 2012, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Russ A., 2013, ECIR 2013, V7814, P845 Chou W.-Y., 2011, JMIR, V13, Balatsoukas Panos, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P1728 Priem J., 2012, Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact, Balatsoukas Panos, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V35, P321 Costello K. L., 2010, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V47, P1 Shema H., 2011, Altmetrics, V11, McKendrick D., 2012, JMIR, V14, Syed - Abdul S., 2013, Journal of Medical Internet Research, V15, Letierce J., 2010, Proceedings of the WebSci 2010 Extending the Frontiers of Society OnLine, Balatsoukas P., 2012, International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, V7, P283 Weller K., 2011, Approaches for Defining and Measuring Information Flows within Tweets during Scientific Conferences, P1 Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 2011, User Guide, Niu Xi, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P869 Eysenbach G., 2011, Journal of Medical Internet Research, V13, Kusha K., 2012, JASIST, V63, P1710 Procter Rob, 2010, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCESUK e-Science All Hands Meeting, DEC 07-09, 2009, Oxford, ENGLAND, V368, P4039 ========================================================================*View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340690000019 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The impact factors of open access and subscription journals across fields Authors: Gunasekaran, S; Arunachalam, S Author Full Names: Gunasekaran, Subbiah; Arunachalam, Subbiah Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 107 (3):380-388; AUG 10 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Impact factor, normalized impact factor, open access journals, rank normalized impact factor, subscription journals KeyWords Plus: SCIENCE; DOCUMENTATION Abstract: We have compared the 2-year and 5-year impact factors (IFs), normalized impact factors (NIFs) and rank normalized impact factors (RNIFs) of open access (OA) and subscription journals across the 22 major fields delineated in Essential Science Indicators. Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2012 has assigned 2-year IF to 1,073 OA and 7,290 subscription journals and 5-year IF to 811 OA and 6,705 subscription journals. Overall 12.8% of journals listed in JCR are OA, but a higher percentage of journals are OA in 9 fields, including multidisciplinary (31%), agriculture (19.1%) and microbiology (19.1). Overall 2-year IF is higher than 5-year IF in about 31.5% journals in both OA and subscription journals. But among physics journals, two-thirds of OA journals and 58% of subscription journals have a higher 2-year IF. For multidisciplinary journals the mean RNIF is higher for OA journals than subscription journals. Higher proportion of subscription journals had mean RNIF above 0.5: 361 of 1,073 OA journals (33.6%) and 3,857 of 7,280 subscription journals (52.9%) had a 2-year mean RNIF above 0.5 and 277 of 811 OA journals (34.2%) and 3,453 of 6705 (51.5%) subscription journals had a 5-year mean RINF above 0.5. Moving to OA has proven to be advantageous to developing country journals; it has helped a large number of Latin American and many Indian journals improve their IF. Addresses: [Gunasekaran, Subbiah] CSIR Cent Elect Res Inst, Knowledge Resource Ctr, Karaikkudi 623302, Tamil Nadu, India. [Arunachalam, Subbiah] Ctr Internet & Soc, Bangalore 560071, Karnataka, India. E-mail Addresses: guna1970 at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 34 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AN6FJ Unique ID: WOS:000340690000019 Cited References: Giglia, 2010, ELPUB 2010 International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 16-18 June, 2010, Helsinki, Finland, Thomson Reuters, 2012, JCR, Molloy Jennifer C., 2011, PLOS BIOLOGY, V9, McVeigh M. E., 2004, Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns a citation study from Thomson Scientific, Garfield E., 2000, Annual Meeting, 9 May, 2000, Bjork Bo-Christer, 2012, BMC MEDICINE, V10, Gumpenberger Christian, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P221 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Bohannon John, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P60 Gunasekaran Subbiah, 2011, CURRENT SCIENCE, V101, P1287 Bjork B.-C., 2010, PLoS One, V5, Rivers C., 2013, Scholarly impact of open access journals, Garg K. C., 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V68, P151 Morrison H., 2012, Imagin. J. Poet. Econ., Suber P., 2012, Voices, Swan A., 2010, Technical Report, Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Kolata G, 2013, The New York Times, SEN BK, 1992, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V48, P318 Lawrence S, 2001, NATURE, V411, P521 Dallmeier-Tiessen S., 2011, arXiv preprint arXiv:1101.5260, Thomson Reuters, 2013, Essential Science Indicators, MarshakovaShaikevich I, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V35, P283 Pudovkin AI, 2004, ASIST 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 67TH ASIS&T ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 41, 200467th Annual Meeting of the American-Society-for-Information-Science-and-Technology, NOV 12-17, 2004, Providence, RI, V41, P507 Prasad R., 2012, The Hindu, Sahu D. K., 2006, INASP Newsletter, Eysenbach Gunther, 2006, PLOS BIOLOGY, V4, P692 Packer A. L., 2009, Can. J. Higher Educ., V39, P111 Hamad S., 2007, The open access citation advantage: quality advantage or quality bias?, Gargouri Yassine, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Gunasekaran Subbiah, 2012, CURRENT SCIENCE, V103, P757 Packer A. L., 2010, Workshop on Essential Rare Works Collection in Biodiversity: Governance, Operation and Digitization, 3-5 February, 2010, Sao Paulo, ASCB, 2012, Annual Meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology, 16 December, 2012, San Francisco, CA, Beall J., 2013, Beall's list: potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers, ------------------------------------------------------------- *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340986500006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Fate of Abstracts Presented at the 2009 American Transplant Congress Authors: Durinka, JB; Chang, PN; Ortiz, J Author Full Names: Durinka, Joel B.; Chang, Po-Nan; Ortiz, Jorge Source: JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 71 (5):674-679; 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.002 SEP-OCT 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: transplant research, abdominal transplantation, journal publications KeyWords Plus: SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION; MEETINGS; JOURNALS; ASSOCIATION Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Oral and poster presentations at major meetings serve to rapidly present and share study results with the scientific community. On the other hand, full-text publication of abstracts in peer-reviewed journals provides dissemination of knowledge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2009 American Transplant Congress (ATC), to assess the factors influencing publication and determine the *impact factor* of these journals. METHODS: All abstracts presented at the 2009 ATC were included in the study. A Pubmed-Medline search was performed to identify a matching journal article. Topics, country of origin, study type, study center and publication year were tabulated. Journals and impact factors of publication were noted. RESULTS: Out of 1938 oral and posters abstracts presented, 103 (16.6%) of oral abstracts and 141 poster 'abstracts (10.9%) were published as full-text articles. Publication rates according to topics of the meeting and country of origin did demonstrate statistical significant differences (p < 0.05). Single-centered studies had higher publication rates 70.87% (73/103) than multi-centered studies among oral abstracts. Abstracts from multi-centered studies had higher publication rates among poster abstracts (68.09% vs 31.91%), and the journals they were published in had higher impact factors than single center studies (4.578 vs 3.897). The median *impact factor* of the journals was 4.2 (4.8 for oral presentations and 3.627 for poster presentations) that went on to be published as full text manuscripts. When comparing multi-center and single institutions, the difference between 12 month and 24 month publication rates was not statistically significant (p = 0.5443 and 0.1134). However, oral and poster abstracts published by study center (multi/single) did demonstrate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001); comparing the type of study, there was also a statistically significant difference between the oral and poster abstract (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The publication rate for abstracts of this 2009 ATC was lower than rates from other fields of medicine. Factors leading to failure require elucidation. Encouraging authors to submit their presentations for full-text publication might improve the rate of publication. Authors should be wary of accepting oral and poster abstracts as dogma; authors should refrain from citing them in publications especially if they are from outside United States and are about liver and kidney transplantation. (C) 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Durinka, Joel B.; Chang, Po-Nan; Ortiz, Jorge] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA. E-mail Addresses: Jdurinka at aol.com Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA ISSN: 1931-7204 eISSN: 1878-7452 Web of Science Categories: Education, Scientific Disciplines; Surgery Research Areas: Education & Educational Research; Surgery IDS Number: AO0GG Unique ID: WOS:000340986500006 Cited References: Clever LH, 1997, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V126, P36 Scherer R. W., 2007, COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, YENTIS SM, 1993, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, V40, P632 von Elm Erik, 2003, BMC medical research methodology, V3, P12 Timmer A, 2001, PANCREAS, V23, P212 Preston CF, 2006, JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, V20, P129 van der Steen LPE, 2004, PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, V114, P113 Arrive L, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V232, P101 Marx WF, 1999, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, V20, P1173 Kwong Yune, 2007, INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, V38, P745 Gilbert WM, 2004, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, V191, P32 Van Spall Harriette G. C., 2007, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V297, P1233 Bhandari M, 2002, JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, V84A, P615 Montane E., 2007, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, V63, P103 Weale AR, 2006, ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLANDAnnual Meeting of the Association-of-Surgeons-of-Great-Britain-and-Ireland, APR 28-30, 2004, Harrogate, ENGLAND, V88, P52 Miguel-Dasit A, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V239, P521 Uysal Sezer, 2008, CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, V46, P1562 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569800010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0: can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction? Authors: Ponomarev, IV; Lawton, BK; Williams, DE; Schnell, JD Author Full Names: Ponomarev, Ilya V.; Lawton, Brian K.; Williams, Duane E.; Schnell, Joshua D. Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (3):755-765; 10.1007/s11192-014-1320-9 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Highly cited papers, Breakthrough paper indicator, Citation trajectories, Interdisciplinarity measures, Rao-Stirling-Porter index, Geographical diversity, Research management, Science policy KeyWords Plus: SCIENCE; DIFFERENTIATION; COLLABORATION; CITATIONS; NETWORKS; JOURNALS; IMPACT; MODEL Abstract: We report progress on new developments in the breakthrough paper indicator, which allows early selection of a small group of publications which may become potential breakthrough candidates based on dynamics of publication citations and certain qualitative characteristics of citations. We used a quantitative approach to identify typical citation patterns of highly cited papers. Based on these analyses, we propose two forecasting models to select groups of breakthrough paper candidates that exceed high citation thresholds five years post-publication. Here we study whether interdisciplinarity in the subject categories or geographical diversity serve as possible measures to improve ranking of breakthrough paper candidates. We found that ranked geographical diversities of known breakthrough papers have equal or better ranks than corresponding citations ranks. This allows us to apply additional filtering for better identifications of breakthrough candidates. We studied several interdisciplinarity indices, including richness, Shannon index, Simpson index, and Rao-Stirling-Porter index. We did not find any correlations between citation ranks and ranked interdisciplinarity indices. Addresses: [Ponomarev, Ilya V.; Williams, Duane E.; Schnell, Joshua D.] Thomson Reuters, Rockville, MD 20850 USA. [Lawton, Brian K.] Redtail Creek Software, Rockville, MD USA. E-mail Addresses: ilyasoft at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 34 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN4PJ Unique ID: WOS:000340569800010 Cited References: Katz JS, 1997, RESEARCH POLICY, V26, P1 KOHN W, 1965, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V140, P1133 DISTEL RJ, 1987, CELL, V49, P835 Porter Alan L., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P117 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Leydesdorff Loet, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P87 GELLER NL, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P3 Edwards R. G., 1978, Lancet, V312, P366 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 GARFIELD E, 1992, THEORETICAL MEDICINE, V13, P117 AVERSA ES, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P383 HECK RF, 1968, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, V90, P5518 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 GARFIELD E, 1990, CURRENT CONTENTS, V11, P3 Radhakrishna Rao C., 1982, Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002), V44, P1 Rafols Ismael, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P263 Chen Chaomei, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P191 ABRAHAMS E, 1979, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V42, P673 PENDLEBURY D, 1989, SCIENTIST, V3, P14 Ponomarev Ilya V., 2014, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V81, P49 KATZ JS, 1994, SCIENTOMETRICS, V31, P31 Nalimov V.V., 1969, Naukometriya. Izuchenie nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa (Scientometrics. Study of science as an information process.), Frenken K., 2005, Papers in regional science, V89, P351 Conover W. J., 1999, Practical nonparametric statistics, van Raan AFJ, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P347 Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 Glanzel W, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P571 Novoselov KS, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P666 WEINBERG S, 1967, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V19, P1264 Rousseau L., 1990, Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340569800002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The use of citation speed *to* understand the effects of a multi-institutional science center Authors: Youtie, J Author Full Names: Youtie, Jan Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (3):613-621; 10.1007/s11192-014-1297-4 SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citation, Research center, Speed, Self-citation KeyWords Plus: AUTHOR SELF-CITATIONS; JOURNALS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; MACRO Abstract: The extent to which an article attracts citations has long been of interest. However, recent research has emphasized not just the receipt but also the pacing of citation. Citation speed has been shown to be affected by journal prestige and self-citation but also public funding of research. Amidst these viewpoints, this paper explores the speed of article citation of a multi-institutional, multi-disciplinary publicly funded research center relative to that of a comparison group of articles. Results indicate that articles by authors affiliated with the center are significantly more likely to have early-cited papers within the year of publication than the random comparison group, with controls by field also being significant. Implications for the ability of a publicly funded center to attract attention toward articles are discussed. Addresses: [Youtie, Jan] Georgia Inst Technol, Enterprise Innovat Inst, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA. [Youtie, Jan] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA. E-mail Addresses: jan.youtie at innovate.gatech.edu Cited Reference Count: 22 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AN4PJ Unique ID: WOS:000340569800002 Cited References: van Raan AFJ, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P467 Rogers J., 2012, the Innovative Methods for Innovation Management and Policy Conference, Beijing, LEWISON G, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICS, V21, P223 Leydesdorff L, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V43, P5 Rousseau R, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS5th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, JUN 04-06, 1998, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, V44, P521 Schubert A, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Informetrics and Bibliometrics, JUL 24-28, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V67, P503 Rogers Juan D., 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P281 Bornmann Lutz, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P83 Hargens LL, 2000, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V65, P846 Porter Alan L., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P117 Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 Rafols Ismael, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P1262 White M., 2000, Library Quarterly, V67, P122 SHADISH WR, 1995, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V25, P477 MacRoberts MH, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P435 Aksnes DW, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V56, P235 Merton R. K., 1973, The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, P439 Rogers Juan D., 2012, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V21, P368 Glanzel W, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P281 COZZENS SE, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V15, P437 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Youtie Jan, 2013, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V22, P145 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340780300025 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Collective credit allocation in science Authors: Shen, HW; Barabasi, AL Author Full Names: Shen, Hua-Wei; Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo Source: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 111 (34):12325-12330; 10.1073/pnas.1401992111 AUG 26 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: network science, scientific impact, team science KeyWords Plus: RADIATION PRESSURE; SCIENTIFIC IMPACT; CITATION ANALYSIS; NETWORKS; INDEX; ATOMS; PUBLICATION; PARTICLES; AUTHOR; LAWS Abstract: Collaboration among researchers is an essential component of the modern scientific enterprise, playing a particularly important role in multidisciplinary research. However, we continue to wrestle with allocating credit to the coauthors of publications with multiple authors, because the relative contribution of each author is difficult to determine. At the same time, the scientific community runs an informal field-dependent credit allocation process that assigns credit in a collective fashion to each work. Here we develop a credit allocation algorithm that captures the coauthors' contribution to a publication as perceived by the scientific community, reproducing the informal collective credit allocation of science. We validate the method by identifying the authors of Nobel-winning papers that are credited for the discovery, independent of their positions in the author list. The method can also compare the relative impact of researchers working in the same field, even if they did not publish together. The ability to accurately measure the relative credit of researchers could affect many aspects of credit allocation in science, potentially impacting hiring, funding, and promotion decisions. Addresses: [Shen, Hua-Wei] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Comp Technol, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China. [Shen, Hua-Wei; Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo] Northeastern Univ, Ctr Complex Network Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA. [Shen, Hua-Wei; Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo] Northeastern Univ, Dept Phys, Boston, MA 02115 USA. [Shen, Hua-Wei; Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo] Northeastern Univ, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA. [Shen, Hua-Wei; Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo] Northeastern Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA. [Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Canc Syst Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA. [Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA. [Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo] Cent European Univ, Ctr Network Sci, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary. E-mail Addresses: barabasi at gmail.com Funding Acknowledgement: National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB340401]; National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) [2014AA015103]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [61202215, 61232010]; Lockheed Martin Corporation [SRA 11.18.11]; Network Science Collaborative Technology Alliance; US Army Research Laboratory Agreement [W911NF-09-2-0053]; Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency Agreement [11645021]; Future and Emerging Technologies Project "Multiplex" - European Commission [317 532]; National Institutes of Health, Centers of Excellence of Genomic Science Agreement [1P50HG4233] Funding Text: We thank Dashun Wang, Chaoming Song, Roberta Sinatra, Santiago Gil, Pierre Deville, Qing Jin, Burcu Yucesoy, Elena Renda, and all other colleagues at Center for Complex Network Research for valuable discussions and comments. H.-W.S. is supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) Grant 2014CB340401, National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) Grant 2014AA015103, and National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 61202215 and 61232010. A.-L.B. is supported by Lockheed Martin Corporation (SRA 11.18.11), and the Network Science Collaborative Technology Alliance is sponsored by US Army Research Laboratory Agreement W911NF-09-2-0053, Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency Agreement 11645021, the Future and Emerging Technologies Project 317 532 "Multiplex" financed by the European Commission, and National Institutes of Health, Centers of Excellence of Genomic Science Agreement 1P50HG4233. Cited Reference Count: 52 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: NATL ACAD SCIENCES, 2101 CONSTITUTION AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20418 USA ISSN: 0027-8424 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AN7LA Unique ID: WOS:000340780300025 Cited References: GURALNIK GS, 1964, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V13, P585 Campbell P, 1999, Nature, V399, P393 Mones E, 2014, arXiv:1401.4676, GORDON JP, 1980, PHYSICAL REVIEW A, V21, P1606 Stallings Jonathan, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V110, P9680 HIGGS PW, 1964, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V13, P508 Mazloumian Amin, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Shen HW, 2014, Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, P291 Rybski Diego, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V106, P12640 Lehmann Sune, 2006, NATURE, V444, P1003 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 McGloin David, 2010, OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS, V21, P20 Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 Albert R, 2002, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, V74, P47 Radicchi Filippo, 2009, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V80, HODGE SE, 1981, SCIENCE, V213, P950 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 [Anonymous], 2014, BBC News, Lawrence Peter A., 2007, CURRENT BIOLOGY, V17, PR583 CHU S, 1985, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V55, P48 Tscharntke Teja, 2007, PLOS BIOLOGY, V5, P13 Ahn Yong-Yeol, 2010, NATURE, V466, P761 ASHKIN A, 1970, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V24, P156 Kennedy D, 2003, SCIENCE, V301, P733 Wang Dashun, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P127 Ren Fu-Xin, 2012, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V391, P3533 Petersen Alexander M., 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V108, P18 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 Allen Liz, 2014, NATURE, V508, P312 Hagen Nils T., 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, Brune M, 1996, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V77, P4887 Wuchty Stefan, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1036 Garlaschelli D, 2003, NATURE, V423, P165 GRUNBERG P, 1986, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V57, P2442 Meekhof DM, 1996, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V76, P1796 Azoulay Pierre, 2014, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V60, P92 Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P131 de Clippel Geoffroy, 2008, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, V139, P176 Greene Mott, 2007, NATURE, V450, P1165 BAIBICH MN, 1988, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V61, P2472 Sekercioglu Cagan H., 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P371 LETT PD, 1988, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V61, P169 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Zhang Chun-Ting, 2009, EMBO REPORTS, V10, P416 Foulkes W, 1996, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V312, P1423 Biggs Jeffrey, 2008, PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, V41, P246 HEWISH A, 1968, NATURE, V217, P709 Hirsch J. E., 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P19193 Kaur Jasleen, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P924 Novoselov KS, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P666 ENGLERT F, 1964, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V13, P321 ======================================================================== = *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000341056300003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis Authors: Blanc, X; Collet, TH; Auer, R; Fischer, R; Locatelli, I; Iriarte, P; Krause, J; Legare, F; Cornuz, J Author Full Names: Blanc, Xavier; Collet, Tinh-Hai; Auer, Reto; Fischer, Roland; Locatelli, Isabella; Iriarte, Pablo; Krause, Jan; Legare, France; Cornuz, Jacques Source: BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 14 10.1186/1472-6947-14-71 AUG 9 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Shared decision making, Bibliometric analysis, Decision making, Full text search, Review, Information storage and retrieval, PubMed, Text mining KeyWords Plus: HEALTH-CARE; POISSON REGRESSION; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; HIGH AGREEMENT; LOW KAPPA; ARTICLES; MODEL; CHALLENGE; PARADOXES; ENCOUNTER Abstract: Background: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is increasingly advocated as a model for medical decision making. However, there is still low use of SDM in clinical practice. High *impact factor* journals might represent an efficient way for its dissemination. We aimed to identify and characterize publication trends of SDM in 15 high impact medical journals. Methods: We selected the 15 general and internal medicine journals with the highest *impact factor* publishing original articles, letters and editorials. We retrieved publications from 1996 to 2011 through the full-text search function on each journal website and abstracted bibliometric data. We included publications of any type containing the phrase "shared decision making" or five other variants in their abstract or full text. These were referred to as SDM publications. A polynomial Poisson regression model with logarithmic link function was used to assess the evolution across the period of the number of SDM publications according to publication characteristics. Results: We identified 1285 SDM publications out of 229,179 publications in 15 journals from 1996 to 2011. The absolute number of SDM publications by journal ranged from 2 to 273 over 16 years. SDM publications increased both in absolute and relative numbers per year, from 46 (0.32% relative to all publications from the 15 journals) in 1996 to 165 (1.17%) in 2011. This growth was exponential (P < 0.01). We found fewer research publications (465, 36.2% of all SDM publications) than non-research publications, which included non-systematic reviews, letters, and editorials. The increase of research publications across time was linear. Full-text search retrieved ten times more SDM publications than a similar PubMed search (1285 vs. 119 respectively). Conclusion: This review in full-text showed that SDM publications increased exponentially in major medical journals from 1996 to 2011. This growth might reflect an increased dissemination of the SDM concept to the medical community. Addresses: [Blanc, Xavier; Collet, Tinh-Hai; Auer, Reto; Fischer, Roland; Locatelli, Isabella; Cornuz, Jacques] Univ Lausanne, Dept Ambulatory Care & Community Med, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. [Collet, Tinh-Hai] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Serv Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Lausanne, Switzerland. [Iriarte, Pablo; Krause, Jan] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Med Fac Lib, Lausanne, Switzerland. [Legare, France] Univ Laval, Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Dept Med Familiale & Med Urgence, Chaire Rech Canada, Quebec City, PQ, Canada. E-mail Addresses: Xavier.Blanc2 at chuv.ch Funding Acknowledgement: Department of Community Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland; Swiss National Science Foundation; Swiss Foundation for Grants in Biology and Medicine [PBLAP3-145870, P3SMP3-155318] Funding Text: We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Department of Community Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland. Dr T-H Collet's research is supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Foundation for Grants in Biology and Medicine (PBLAP3-145870, P3SMP3-155318). We thank Isabelle de Kaenel (Medicine Faculty Library, Lausanne, Switzerland) for assisting with the correspondence with the selected journals; Sylvie Payot (Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne) for helping in the data management; the 6 journals which provided their published materials for us (American Journal of Preventive Medicine, the BMJ, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management). Cited Reference Count: 48 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND ISSN: 1472-6947 Article Number: 71 Web of Science Categories: Medical Informatics Research Areas: Medical Informatics IDS Number: AO1EY Unique ID: WOS:000341056300003 Cited References: Barry Michael, 2011, HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, V14, P1 Barratt Alexandra, 2008, PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, V73, P407 Giguere A, 2012, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V10, FEINSTEIN AR, 1990, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V43, P543 Caldon Lisa J. M., 2011, HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, V14, P133 Rosmarakis ES, 2005, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, V100, P443 Saint S, 2000, JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, V15, P881 Woolf SH, 2000, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, V19, P79 Salzburg Global S, 2011, BMJ, V342, Pd1745 Elwyn Glyn, 2008, IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, V3, Stiggelbout A. M., 2012, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V344, Yin Xiaoshi, 2011, BMC BIOINFORMATICSIEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, DEC 18-21, 2010, Hong Kong, PEOPLES R CHINA, V12, [Anonymous], 2011, Lancet, V377, P784 Blake Catherine, 2010, JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, V43, P173 Elwyn G, 2000, BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, V50, P892 Lee Emily Oshima, 2013, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V368, P6 Frosch Dominick L, 2011, Zeitschrift f?r Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualit?t im Gesundheitswesen, V105, P305 Lin Jimmy, 2009, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V10, Charles C, 1997, SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, V44, P681 Moher David, 2009, PLOS MEDICINE, V6, Moumjid Nora, 2007, MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, V27, P539 Legare France, 2008, PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, V73, P526 Brown Hannah, 2007, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V334, P561 Almeida-Filho N, 2003, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P2037 Delamothe T, 2002, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V325, P1475 CICCHETTI DV, 1990, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V43, P551 Stacey D, 2011, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V10, Kroeze JH, 2003, Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT 2003), P93 Jones Teresa H, 2006, BMC medical informatics and decision making, V6, P24 Loomis D, 2005, OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, V62, P325 Lokker Cynthia, 2008, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V336, P655 Kostoff Ronald N., 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P104 Divoli Anna, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Makoul G, 2006, PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELINGBi-Annual Meeting of the European-Association-for-Communication-in-Healthcare (EACH), SEP 14-17, 2004, Brugge, BELGIUM, V60, P301 Towle A, 1999, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V319, P766 Glanville Julie, 2011, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V342, Gelman A, 2006, Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models, Sim J, 2005, PHYSICAL THERAPY, V85, P257 Callaham M, 2002, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION4th International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, SEP 14-16, 2001, BARCELONA, SPAIN, V287, P2847 PARKER RA, 1989, STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, V8, P285 GARFIELD E, 1986, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V105, P313 Elwyn Glyn, 2010, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V341, H?rter Martin, 2011, Zeitschrift f?r Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualit?t im Gesundheitswesen, V105, P229 Seglen PO, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P498 Smith Richard, 2006, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, V35, P1129 Edwards A, 2009, Shared-decision Making in Health Care, Van Noorden Richard, 2012, NATURE, V483, P134 Falagas M. E., 2010, INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, V40, P587 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340824500010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Mental Health First Aid is *an* effective public health intervention for improving knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour: A meta-analysis Authors: Hadlaczky, G; Hokby, S; Mkrtchian, A; Carli, V; Wasserman, D Author Full Names: Hadlaczky, Gergo; Hokby, Sebastian; Mkrtchian, Anahit; Carli, Vladimir; Wasserman, Danuta Source: INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 26 (4):467-475; 10.3109/09540261.2014.924910 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DELPHI EXPERT CONSENSUS; SUICIDAL PERSON; HELPING SOMEONE; SUBSTANCE USE; GUIDELINES; DISORDERS; ILLNESS; CONSUMERS; DEPRESSION Abstract: Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) is a standardized, psychoeducational programme developed to empower the public to approach, support and refer individuals in distress by improving course participants' knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to mental ill-health. The present paper aims to synthesize published evaluations of the MHFA programme in a meta-analysis to estimate its effects and potential as a public mental health awareness-increasing strategy. Fifteen relevant papers were identified through a systematic literature search. Standardized effect sizes were calculated for three different outcome measures: change in knowledge, attitudes, and helping behaviours. The results of the metaanalysis for these outcomes yielded a mean effect size of Glass's. Delta = 0.56 (95% CI = 0.38 - 0.74; p < 0.001), 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22 - 0.35; p < 0.001) and 0.25 (95% CI = 0.12 - 0.38; p < 0.001), respectively. Results were homogenous, and moderator analyses suggested no systematic bias or differences in results related to study design (with or without control group) or 'publication quality' (journal *impact factor*). The results demonstrate that MHFA increases participants' knowledge regarding mental health, decreases their negative attitudes, and increases supportive behaviours toward individuals with mental health problems. The MHFA programme appears recommendable for public health action. Addresses: [Hadlaczky, Gergo; Hokby, Sebastian; Mkrtchian, Anahit; Carli, Vladimir; Wasserman, Danuta] Karolinska Inst, Natl Ctr Suicide Res & Prevent Mental Ill Hlth, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail Addresses: Gergo.Hadlaczki at ki.se Cited Reference Count: 68 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INFORMA HEALTHCARE, TELEPHONE HOUSE, 69-77 PAUL STREET, LONDON EC2A 4LQ, ENGLAND ISSN: 0954-0261 eISSN: 1369-1627 Web of Science Categories: Psychiatry Research Areas: Psychiatry IDS Number: AN8AZ Unique ID: WOS:000340824500010 Cited References: Corrigan PW, 2004, J Ment Health, V13, P537 Langlands Robyn L., 2008, JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, V105, P157 McGinn Carrie Anna, 2012, BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, V12, Demyttenaere K, 2004, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V291, P2581 Hart Laura M., 2009, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V9, Kitchener Betty A., 2002, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V2, Ahmedani B., 2011, Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, V8, P1 Jorm Anthony F., 2010, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V10, Berk Lesley, 2011, BIPOLAR DISORDERS, V13, P556 Reavley Nicola J., 2012, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V12, Sartore Gina-Maree, 2008, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, V16, P313 Hatzenbuehler Mark L., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, V103, P813 Clyne Wendy, 2012, BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, V12, Ross Anna M., 2012, EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, V6, P229 Cooper H. M., 2009, Schwarzer R., 1989, Meta: Meta-analysis Programs, Morgan Amy J., 2009, JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, V115, P196 Wang Philip S., 2007, LANCET, V370, P841 Henderson Claire, 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, V103, P777 Beehler Gregory P., 2013, IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, V8, Wang PS, 2005, ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, V62, P603 Hossain D, 2009, Australas Psychiatry, V17, P116 Hinshaw SP, 2005, JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, V46, P714 Kelly Claire M., 2011, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, V5, Colucci Erminia, 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, V4, Hinshaw SP, 2000, DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, V12, P555 Kitchener Betty A., 2008, EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, V2, P55 Burrow J., 2010, Increasing mental health literacy among student affairs staff : Assessing 'Mental Health First Aid', Jorm Anthony F., 2004, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V4, Colucci Erminia, 2011, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, V5, Morawska Alina, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, V22, P85 Wasserman D., 2012, EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, V27, P129 Kingston Anna H., 2009, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V9, Reavley Nicola J, 2013, PeerJ, V1, Pe43 Stuart Heather, 2006, CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, V19, P522 Langlands Robyn L., 2008, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, V34, P435 Ryan Siobhan M., 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, Hemmings C. P., 2009, JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, V53, P677 Wittchen H. U., 2011, EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V21, P655 Corrigan P, 2004, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V59, P614 Minas Harry, 2009, International journal of mental health systems, V3, P19 Kelly Claire M., 2007, MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, V187, PS26 Hart Laura M., 2010, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V10, Cumming G, 2005, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V60, P170 McDaid D., 2008, Countering the stigmatisation and discrimination of people with mental health problems in Europe, Pierce David, 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, V4, Kitchener BA, 2006, AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, V40, P6 Jorm Anthony F, 2008, International journal of mental health systems, V2, P2 McIntyre Sarah, 2010, DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, V52, P270 Hansson L., 2013, Socialstyrelsen, P15 Durlak Joseph A., 2009, JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, V34, P917 Colucci Erminia, 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, V4, Kelly Claire M., 2010, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V10, Whiteford Harvey A., 2013, LANCET, V382, P1575 Bogardus Emory S., 1947, SOCIOMETRY, V10, P306 Kingston Anna H., 2011, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V11, Lam Angus Y. K., 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, V4, Kelly Claire M., 2008, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V8, 2009, Oxford Textbook of Suicidology and Suicide Prevention: A Global Perspective, Kelly Claire M., 2009, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V9, Baumann Anja Esther, 2007, INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY14th Congress of the Association-of-European-Psychiatrists, MAR 04-08, 2006, Nice, FRANCE, V19, P131 Dumesnil Helene, 2009, PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, V60, P1203 Ferrari Alize J., 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, Norder Giny, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Chinn S, 2000, STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, V19, P3127 Kelly Claire M., 2008, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V8, Kitchener Betty A., 2004, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V4, Thomas K., 2012, Psychology Research and Behavior Management, V2012, P173 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000340943200006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Factors associated with publication of randomized phase III cancer trials in journals with a high *impact factor* Authors: Tang, PA; Pond, GR; Welch, S; Chen, EX Author Full Names: Tang, P. A.; Pond, G. R.; Welch, S.; Chen, E. X. Source: CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 21 (4):E564-E572; 10.3747/co.21.1937 AUG 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Impact factor, cancer trials, publication, predictive factors KeyWords Plus: CLINICAL-TRIALS; SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION; CONSORT STATEMENT; QUALITY; ONCOLOGY; BIAS; INDUSTRY; OUTCOMES; CITATION; SCIENCE Abstract: Background *Impact factor* (IF) is often used as a measure of journal quality. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether trials with positive outcomes are more likely to be published in journals with higher ifs. Methods We reviewed 476 randomized phase III cancer trials published in 13 journals between 1995 and 2005. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate predictors of publication in journals with high ifs (compared with low and medium ifs). Results A positive outcome had the strongest association with publication in high-if journals [odds ratio (or): 4.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.67 to 6.37; p < 0.001]. Other associated factors were a larger sample size (or: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.10; p = 0.001), intention-to-treat analysis (or: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.56 to 4.10; p < 0.001), North American authors (or for European authors: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.58; or for international authors: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.82; p < 0.001), adjuvant therapy trial (or: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.61 to 4.15; p < 0.001), shorter time to publication (or: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.92; p < 0.001), uncommon tumour type (or: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.90 to 2.13; p = 0.012), and hematologic malignancy (or: 3.15; 95% CI: 1.41 to 7.03; p = 0.012). Conclusions Cancer trials with positive outcomes are more likely to be published in journals with high ifs. Readers of medical literature should be aware of this "*impact factor* bias," and investigators should be encouraged to submit reports of trials of high methodologic quality to journals with high ifs regardless of study outcomes. Addresses: [Tang, P. A.] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Med Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada. [Pond, G. R.] Juravinski Hosp & Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada. [Welch, S.] London Reg Canc Program, Dept Med Oncol, London, ON, Canada. [Chen, E. X.] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Med Oncol & Hematol, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada. [Chen, E. X.] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada. E-mail Addresses: eric.chen at uhn.on.ca Cited Reference Count: 39 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MULTIMED INC, 66 MARTIN ST, TORONTO, ON L9T 2R2, CANADA ISSN: 1198-0052 Web of Science Categories: Oncology Research Areas: Oncology IDS Number: AN9QR Unique ID: WOS:000340943200006 Cited References: Djulbegovic B, 2000, LANCETVII Cochrane Colloquium, OCT 05-09, 1999, ROME, ITALY, V356, P635 Hopewell Sally, 2009, COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, Knox KS, 2000, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, V11, P1591 EASTERBROOK PJ, 1991, LANCET, V337, P867 Booth Christopher M., 2008, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY43rd Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Clinical-Oncology, JUN 01-05, 2007, Chicago, IL, V26, P5458 Krzyzanowska MK, 2003, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION38th Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Clinical-Oncology, MAY 18-21, 2002, ORLANDO, FLORIDA, V290, P495 TAUBES G, 1993, SCIENCE, V260, P884 Lee Kirby P., 2006, MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, V184, P621 Link AM, 1998, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION3rd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, SEP, 1997, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC, V280, P246 GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Yanada Masamitsu, 2007, CANCER, V110, P334 Soares HP, 2004, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V328, P22 You B, 2010, J Clin Oncol, V28, ERNST E, 1991, NATURE, V352, P560 Begg C, 1996, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V276, P637 Moher D, 2001, LANCET, V357, P1191 Juni P, 1999, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V282, P1054 DICKERSIN K, 1990, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION1ST INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION, MAY 10-12, 1989, CHICAGO, IL, V263, P1385 Timmer Antje, 2002, BMC medical research methodology, V2, P7 Littner Y, 2005, ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, V159, P1036 Schulz Kenneth F., 2010, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V152, P726 Gluud LL, 2005, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, V100, P2431 DEBELLEFEUILLE C, 1992, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, V3, P187 Dwan Kerry, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, Jadad AR, 1996, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, V17, P1 Olson CM, 2002, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION4th International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, SEP 14-16, 2001, BARCELONA, SPAIN, V287, P2825 Tam Vincent C., 2008, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY43rd Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Clinical-Oncology, JUN 01-05, 2007, Chicago, IL, V26, P2205 Dwan Kerry, 2011, COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, Seglen PO, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P498 Callaham M, 2002, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION4th International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, SEP 14-16, 2001, BARCELONA, SPAIN, V287, P2847 Jimenez-Contreras E, 2002, NATURE, V417, P898 Peppercorn Jeffrey, 2007, CANCER41st Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Clinical-Oncology, MAY 13-17, 2005, Orlando, FL, V109, P1239 ARMITAGE P, 1955, BIOMETRICS, V11, P375 Ioannidis JPA, 2005, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V294, P218 Camacho LH, 2005, CANCER, V104, P1497 Sterne JE, 2009, Adam D, 2002, NATURE, V415, P726 Huwiler-Muntener K, 2002, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION4th International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, SEP 14-16, 2001, BARCELONA, SPAIN, V287, P2801 Lexchin J, 2003, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V326, P1167 ======================================================================== -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: