STI conference Leiden--Quality standards for evaluation indicators
Paul Colin de Glouceſter
de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG
Mon Oct 13 07:43:55 EDT 2014
On September 2nd, 2014, Katy Boerner submitted:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"Dear all, |
|I very much like to see that there will be a discussion about |
|quality standards for evaluation indicators at STI. |
|The development of validated data analysis and visualization |
|workflows/tools and the generation of replicable results is at the |
|core of any scientific effort that aims to convert data into |
|actionable insights. Good to see the background material provided |
|(you might also like to review results from the below workshops) and|
|hope results of the special session will be shared widely. |
|Best regards, |
|k |
| |
|Recent Standards Workshops |
|OECD-experts dialogue on scientometrics: Improving the use of |
|bibliometric indicators and analysis for policy-making. |
|March 25, 2014 | OECD, Paris, France |
| |
|Science Mapping Standards Workshop |
|November 04-05, 2013 | Bloomington, Indiana |
| |
|Standards for Science Mapping and Classifications |
|July 15, 2013 | ISSI, Vienna, Austria |
| |
|JSMF Workshop on Standards for Science Metrics, Classifications, and|
|Mapping |
|August 11-12, 2011 | Bloomington, IN" |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
Dear all:
I agree that validation and replication are good things.
With best regards,
Paul Colin de Glouceſter
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list