As for me, I am not arguing the case of the subscription system on its m= erits. It functioned well in its day. I am arguing the case on = its brutal economics. The subscription system is not financially effi= cient. It costs a lot to publish a journal, and editors are forcing authors to remain within size limits due to cost facto= rs. Even then costs sky rocket because the publication universe is ex= ponentially expanding.

On the other hand, computer space has become very cheap. I have a = nephew working for EMC, which makes and sells computer space. It star= ted making money hand over fist, and its stock went through the roof, enric= hing me. When I asked him why, he said that its product became very cheap, and the company was able to reduce dra= stically the price on its product, exponentially expanding it sales. = That is when a company really makes money.

The logic here is to base the scientific information system not on = publication and journals but on computer space, which seems to be infinite = and cheap. That is what is done by open access institutional rep= ositories, which are now feasible because the Google search engine can efficiently index them and retrieve from them. Tec= hnology has made the journal not only technologically outmoded but eco= nomically inefficient. As for scientometrics, everything human social= ly stratifies, and institutional repositories will also do this, and the game can go on.

Stephen J. Bensman, Ph.D.

Louisiana State University

USA

From: ASIS&T Special = Interest Group on Metrics <SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU> on behalf of = David Wojick <dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 8:11 AM
To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU
Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Fac= tor Decline

Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://we= b.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html

I agree that bibliometrics research is a case where universal access i= s desireable, although perhaps not necessary, but that is not the case that= I objected to. Note that the bibliometrician does not need access in order= to actually read the two million or so papers published each year, as that is impossible. If you want to ar= gue that the journal system should be reorganized, so that subscriptions di= sappear, in order to serve bibliometrics, be my guest. It is not a strong a= rgument, certainly not strong enough to make the subscription system unsustainable, which is the issue here.

I do not understand your PS so perhaps you did not understand my prior= point.

David

http://insidepublicaccess.com/

On Jul 4, 2014, at 2:27 AM, Andreas Strotmann <andreas.strotmann at GMAIL.C= OM> wrote:

Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://we= b.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
> How can there be a tiny but broad research institutio= n?

Well -- we scientometricians all need access to huge numbers of = papers for decent analyses. And I can immediately list a couple of really t= iny research institutions (tiny compared to universities) in our field: Sci= enceMetrix; SciTech Strategies; iFQ..., not to mention freelance researchers like myself.

Perhaps the Institute for Advanced Studies (of Einstein and G=F6del fa= me) might serve as another example. Germany has tons of research institutes= of this sort (I worked at one, and we collaborated with a bunch of them).<= /div>

-- Andreas

PS: Your statement reminds me of the apocryphal linguist who cl= aimed that there existed no human language in which a double affirmative se= rves as negation - when someone from the audience snickered: yeah, ri= ght.

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:38 PM, David Wojick <dwojick at c= raigellachie.us> wrote:

http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
How can there be a "tiny but broad" research institution? Ea= ch researcher's field is very narrow. If there are a tiny number of researc= hers then their journal needs are equally tiny, not all journals. Even Harv= ard does not need access to all journals.

Note too that a researcher can always get a copy of any article they are in= terested in simply by asking the author for it. That is why the author's em= ail address is always provided.

There is nothing unsustainable about the subscription model.

David Wojick
http://insidep= ublicaccess.com/

--_000_140448218240755199lsuedu_-- From chessnic at COMPUSERVE.COM Fri Jul 4 10:44:52 2014 From: chessnic at COMPUSERVE.COM (Al Henderson) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:44:52 -0400 Subject: PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: "Why are libraries cancelling so much?" The question should be, "Why haven't library collections kept pace with research?" H.S White observed the number one reason for journal cancellations was budget cuts (LQ 1980:287-309). He also noted scientists using grant money for subscriptions, often for titles canceled by the library. Ten years later he wrote, "At the point when our fledgling finally produces a return on investment, we tire of the race. We don't want to pay anymore, and we quit five yard short of the finish line.... Scientific research fascinates us; dissemination ... by far the lesser cost, interests us not one whit." (LJ N 15 1990 51-52). Economist David J. Brown pointed to the disconnect between managers of science agencies and of university libraries in ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING AND LIBRARIES (Bowker-Sauer, 1996) p. 41-43. It was not always so. After World War II -- and especially during the Space Race 1957-1970 -- government policy emphasized library collections and discovery. Library money and collections grew at the same rate as research money. We saw growth and twigging in the birth of specialized research journals, review journals, indexes and abstracts, informal communications, etc. Why did financial support of library collections stop after our man stepped on the Moon -- and well before the development of "open access" journals? In 1979, the National Equiry into Scholarly Communications marked inadequate library collections as the most serious problem facing scholars. Eventually, NIH's chief advocate for open access complained that scientists were spending grant money on subscriptions! Well, should they spend grant money to read -- or to be read, maybe, one day, in PLOS ONE? Excellence vs. ego, I say. Best wishes, Albert Henderson former editor Publishing Research Quarterly -----Original Message----- From: Stephen J Bensman To: SIGMETRICS Sent: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 4:21 pm Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline <97914bd0a71946d0b82c7426a25869b5 at CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <8D164DEDAA437B6-1DC4-3C4D4 at webmail-d164.sysops.aol.com> <1B5F272E-9FEE-4378-A122-EF7CDF806891 at uu.nl> <6.2.0.14.2.20140703153037.042ee980 at pop.craigellachie.us> In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140703153037.042ee980 at pop.craigellachie.us> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [130.39.62.17] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID: x-forefront-prvs: 0261CCEEDF x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(24454002)(14014003)(13464003)(189002)(199002)(479174003)(377454003)(107886001)(107046002)(19625215002)(85306003)(74316001)(21056001)(19300405004)(77096002)(76482001)(77982001)(93886003)(46102001)(106116001)(88552001)(106356001)(83072002)(16236675004)(89122001)(85852003)(87936001)(15395725005)(101416001)(80022001)(75432001)(66066001)(50986999)(81342001)(64706001)(81542001)(19609705001)(76576001)(86362001)(19580405001)(74662001)(20776003)(79102001)(92566001)(95666004)(2171001)(2656002)(15198665003)(105586002)(33646001)(31966008)(15975445006)(15202345003)(54356999)(99286002)(99396002)(83322001)(74502001)(19580395003)(76176999)(108616002)(24736002)(217873001)(10090945008);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1PR06MB173;H:CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;LANG:en; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_d6ddf9d4213349158eadf1c558775907CO1PR06MB174namprd06pro_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: lsu.edu --_000_d6ddf9d4213349158eadf1c558775907CO1PR06MB174namprd06pro_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If there is nothing unsustainable about the subscription model, then why ar= e libraries cancelling so much. The University of Montreal cancelled =BE o= f its Wiley science collection. By your logic libraries could cancel every= thing, and the system would still work. But where would the publishers get= their money if not from libraries? From individual subscriptions at $15,0= 00 a pop. SB From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.= UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 2:38 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Dec= line .edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html How can there be a "tiny but broad" research institution? Each researcher's= field is very narrow. If there are a tiny number of researchers then their= journal needs are equally tiny, not all journals. Even Harvard does not ne= ed access to all journals. Note too that a researcher can always get a copy of any article they are in= terested in simply by asking the author for it. That is why the author's em= ail address is always provided. There is nothing unsustainable about the subscription model. David Wojick http://insidepublicaccess.com/ At 02:47 PM 7/3/2014, you wrote: .edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Albert, Although as a librarian I would like to support your statement and claim mo= re money from my institution I think the unsustainability of the subscripti= on model is more fundamental and not a consequence of discrete policy or ac= tions of stakeholders. It is caused by the unique value of each and every p= ublication combined with ever growing publication volumes. Consider a tiny = but broad research institution. To carry out top research they would need a= ccess to all journals, which is simply impossible to afford under the subsc= ription model of access provision, thus preventing optimal research. The pr= oblem is becoming more apparent because of price increases that are at leas= t partly due to increasing publication volumes. Any lasting solution should= make it possible for anyone to access all published research. That means e= ither a pay-per-view system or open access. The pay-per-view approach is no= t ideal because determining whether something is relevant requires full tex= t access. That leaves open access as the only long term sustainable solutio= n. Giving more money to libraries, and thus sticking with the subscription = model, is not a long term solution. Jeroen Bosman Utrecht University Library Op 3 jul. 2014 om 16:05 heeft "Al Henderson" > het volgende geschreven: .edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html If "the scientific journal system is probabl= y not financially feasible anymore," it is because universities chose to de= cimate library spending. Beginning around 1970, they began to shift the fin= ancial burden of what Vennevar Bush called "conserving the knowledge" from = universities to individual readers. Open Access has shifted it further -- t= o authors. The decision to promote financial inputs for research, which creates journa= l articles, while demoting support for the output may have enhanced univers= ity profitability. But it fails to serve the basic goals of research. The drop in PLOS ONE impact factor ratings probably has many causes, but it= seems to me authors seeking readers may have found better results from bei= ng published in more specialized, well-targeted media. I wonder how many PL= OS ONE articles were first rejected by editors elsewhere. Best wishes, Albert Henderson former editor, Publishing Research Quarterly -----Original Message----- From: Stephen J Bensman > To: SIGMETRICS < SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU> Sent: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 8:59 am Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Dec= line I understand that it costs $3500 to have an article published in PLOS ONE. Times have been tough economically in the world, and this may have somethin= g to do with the drop in submissions and publication. You can post on arXiv for nothing, and Google will get you there. Google Scholar metrics show high retrieval rates from certain subject categories in arXiv. This is the tim= e not of the open access journal but the open access institutional repository. T= he scientific journal system is probably not financially feasible anymore, giv= en high cancellation rates by academic libraries, and the open access institut= ional repository will probably replace it.. Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA -----Original Message----- From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [ mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV= .UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Colin Gloster Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:51 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Dec= line Philip Davis sent: |--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---| |"Can the recent drop in February PLOS ONE publication figures be explained= by| |a decline in their Impact Factor last June? = | | = | |see: = | |PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline = | | http://wp.me/pcvbl-9sV " = | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---| Hari M. Gupta, Jos=E9 R. Campanha, and Rosana A. G. Pesce, "Power-Law Distributions for the Citation Index of Scientific Publications and Scienti= sts", "Brazilian Journal of Physics", vol. 35, no. 4A, December, 2005 claimed: "[. . .] Table I: Citations of the 20 most cited physicists from January 1981 to Jun= e 1997 [. . .] Table II: Citations of the 20 most cited chemists from January= 1981 to June 1997 [. . .] [. . .] It is interesting to note that only two of the= m (P.W. Anderson, and K. A. Muller, at the 13th and 17th places, respectively= ), out of the 20 most cited physicists, and six (J. A. Pople, R. R. Ernst, J. = M. Lehn, R. E. Smalley, E. J. Corey, and K. Tanaka, at the 2nd, 4th, 10th, 12th, 16th, and 20th places= , respectively), out of the 20 most cited chemists, are Nobel laureates. [. . .]" --_000_d6ddf9d4213349158eadf1c558775907CO1PR06MB174namprd06pro_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If there is nothing unsus= tainable about the subscription model, then why are libraries cancelling so= much. The University of Montreal cancelled =BE of its Wiley science collection. By your logic libraries could cancel everything,= and the system would still work. But where would the publishers get = their money if not from libraries? From individual subscriptions at $= 15,000 a pop.

<= /p>

From: ASIS&a= mp;T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 2:38 PM
To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU
Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Fac= tor Decline

Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsub= scribe): http://web.utk.edu= /~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html

How can there be a "tiny but broad" resear= ch institution? Each researcher's field is very narrow. If there are a tiny= number of researchers then their journal needs are equally tiny, not all j= ournals. Even Harvard does not need access to all journals.

Note too that a researcher can always get a copy of any article they are in= terested in simply by asking the author for it. That is why the author's em= ail address is always provided.

There is nothing unsustainable about the subscription model.

David Wojick
http://insidepublicaccess.com/
At 02:47 PM 7/3/2014, you wrote:

Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsub= scribe): http://web.utk.edu= /~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
Albert,

Although as a librarian I would like to support your statement and claim mo= re money from my institution I think the unsustainability of the subscripti= on model is more fundamental and not a consequence of discrete policy or ac= tions of stakeholders. It is caused by the unique value of each and every publication combined with ever growi= ng publication volumes. Consider a tiny but broad research institution. To = carry out top research they would need access to all journals, which is sim= ply impossible to afford under the subscription model of access provision, thus preventing optimal research. = The problem is becoming more apparent because of price increases that are a= t least partly due to increasing publication volumes. Any lasting solution = should make it possible for anyone to access all published research. That means either a pay-per-view system = or open access. The pay-per-view approach is not ideal because determining = whether something is relevant requires full text access. That leaves open a= ccess as the only long term sustainable solution. Giving more money to libraries, and thus sticking with the subsc= ription model, is not a long term solution.

Jeroen Bosman
Utrecht University Library

Op 3 jul. 2014 om 16:05 heeft "Al Henderson" <chessnic at COMPUSERVE.COM > het volgende ge= schreven:

Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsub= scribe): http://web.utk.edu= /~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html If "the scientific journal system is = probably not financially feasible anymore," it is because universities= chose to decimate library spending. Beginning around 1970, they began to s= hift the financial burden of what Vennevar Bush called "conserving the knowledge" from universities to individua= l readers. Open Access has shifted it further -- to authors.

The decision to promote financial inputs for research, which creates journa= l articles, while demoting support for the output may have enhanced univers= ity profitability. But it fails to serve the basic goals of research.

The drop in PLOS ONE impact factor ratings probably has many causes, but it= seems to me authors seeking readers may have found better results from bei= ng published in more specialized, well-targeted media. I wonder how many PL= OS ONE articles were first rejected by editors elsewhere.

Best wishes,

Albert Henderson
former editor, Publishing Research Quarterly

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen J Bensman <notsjb at LSU.ED= U>
To: SIGMETRICS < SIGMETRI= CS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU>
Sent: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 8:59 am
Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Dec= line

Adminstrative info for SIGMETRI= CS (for example unsubscribe):
http://web.utk= .edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html

I understand that it costs $3500 to have an article published in PLOS O= NE.
Times have been tough economically in the world, and this may have some= thing to
do with the drop in submissions and publication. You can post on = arXiv for
nothing, and Google will get you there. Google Scholar metrics sh= ow high
retrieval rates from certain subject categories in arXiv. T= his is the time not
of the open access journal but the open access institutional repository= . The
scientific journal system is probably not financially feasible anymore,= given
high cancellation rates by academic libraries, and the open access inst= itutional
repository will probably replace it..

Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D.
LSU Libraries
Lousiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
USA

-----Original Message-----
From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [ mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU]
On Behalf Of Paul Colin Gloster
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:51 AM
To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.= UTK.EDU
Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor= Decline

Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
http://web.utk= .edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html

Philip Davis sent:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------|
|"Can the recent drop in February PLOS ONE publication figures be = explained by|
|a decline in their Impact Factor last June? &nb= sp; = &nb= sp; |
| &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; |
|see: = &nb= sp; = &nb= sp; = | |PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline = ; &n= bsp; |
| http://wp.me/pcvbl-9sV "&= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------|

Hari M. Gupta, Jos=E9 R. Campanha, and Rosana A. G. Pesce, "Power-= Law
Distributions for the Citation Index of Scientific Publications and Sci= entists",
"Brazilian Journal of Physics", vol. 35, no. 4A, December, 20= 05
claimed:
"[. . .]
Table I: Citations of the 20 most cited physicists from January 1981 to= June
1997 [. . .] Table II: Citations of the 20 most cited chemists from Jan= uary 1981
to June 1997 [. . .] [. . .] It is interesting to note that only two of= them
(P.W. Anderson, and K. A. Muller, at the 13th and 17th places, respecti= vely),
out of the 20 most cited physicists, and six (J. A. Pople, R. R. Ernst,= J. M.
Lehn, R. E. Smalley, E.
J. Corey, and K. Tanaka, at the 2nd, 4th, 10th, 12th, 16th, and 20th pl= aces,
respectively), out of the 20 most cited chemists, are Nobel laureates.<= /tt> [. . .]"

--_000_d6ddf9d4213349158eadf1c558775907CO1PR06MB174namprd06pro_-- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Fri Jul 4 11:45:32 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:45:32 -0400 Subject: PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline In-Reply-To: <1404482182407.55199@lsu.edu> Message-ID: Dear Stephen, that is an interesting possibility, one of many in fact, but possibilities for change are not evidence of the unsustainability of the present system. In fact subscription revenues are still growing. Regarding your specifics, (1) I do not see how cheap computer space works selectively against subscription journals, as they can use it too. (2) Does your repository model eliminate journals altogether? If so then you face the loss of (a) peer review and (b) ranking by rejection, both of which are thought to be values added by journals, among others. But the relative merits of the many various OA models being tried out today are not really the issue here. Every proposal has merit or it would not be being tried out. I just see no evidence that any of them is about to replace the subscription system. Ironically their multiplicity is probably an obstacle in itself. David http://insidepublicaccess.com/ At 09:56 AM 7/4/2014, you wrote: >As for me, I am not arguing the case of the subscription system on its meri= >ts. It functioned well in its day. I am arguing the case on its brutal ec= >onomics. The subscription system is not financially efficient. It costs a= > lot to publish a journal, and editors are forcing authors to remain within= > size limits due to cost factors. Even then costs sky rocket because the p= >ublication universe is exponentially expanding. > > > >On the other hand, computer space has become very cheap. I have a nephew w= >orking for EMC, which makes and sells computer space. It started making mo= >ney hand over fist, and its stock went through the roof, enriching me. Whe= >n I asked him why, he said that its product became very cheap, and the comp= >any was able to reduce drastically the price on its product, exponentially = >expanding it sales. That is when a company really makes money. > > > >The logic here is to base the scientific information system not on publicat= >ion and journals but on computer space, which seems to be infinite and chea= >p. That is what is done by open access institutional repositories, which a= >re now feasible because the Google search engine can efficiently index them= > and retrieve from them. Technology has made the journal not only technolo= >gically outmoded but economically inefficient. As for scientometrics, ever= >ything human socially stratifies, and institutional repositories will also = >do this, and the game can go on. > > > >Stephen J. Bensman, Ph.D. > >Louisiana State University > >USA From notsjb at LSU.EDU Sat Jul 5 08:09:05 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:09:05 +0000 Subject: PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline Message-ID: <1404482182407.55199 at lsu.edu>,<6.2.0.14.2.20140704112807.0443be50 at pop.craigellachie.us> In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140704112807.0443be50 at pop.craigellachie.us> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [99.14.201.175] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID: x-forefront-prvs: 02638D901B x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(6009001)(479174003)(377454003)(199002)(189002)(24454002)(51704005)(20776003)(19580405001)(74662001)(92566001)(79102001)(86362001)(74502001)(95666004)(105586002)(81542001)(81342001)(15202345003)(31966008)(99396002)(76176999)(19580395003)(83322001)(99286002)(92726001)(54356999)(2656002)(2171001)(15975445006)(46102001)(77096002)(561944003)(77982001)(93886003)(85306003)(107046002)(107886001)(21056001)(87936001)(15395725005)(66066001)(85852003)(101416001)(80022001)(75432001)(4396001)(2351001)(50986999)(64706001)(36756003)(76482001)(83072002)(106116001)(109986002)(89122001)(106356001)(88552001)(217873001);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1PR06MB173;H:CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: lsu.edu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.utk.edu id s65C8NKq009522 David, Thank you for giving my ideas serious consideration. I am not sure how this thing is going to work, because it is very complex. My model is arXiv, but there are other open access models. LSU is establishing a repository to give its faculty's research broader accessibility and post data for replication purposes as required by the NIH. I like the idea, because you can store and cite you own data online. The variables and procedures for an institutional depository are complex. There could be mixed models with publishers providing access to repositories for their titles. That seems to be the logic of some of these subscription contracts. The library provides a fixed sum based prior years' subscriptions, and the publisher gives access to its entire list beyond this core. That maintains cash flow but is open access in certain respects. We have access to Scientometrics on this basis. The basic idea is that computer space is cheap and unlimited, and you can get more bang for the buck by incorporating this concept. That kicks open the way for the expansion of the system which was being strangled by the journal system. The publishers were selling less and charging more, and that is the road to financial disaster. If you are interested in how this being done in business, here is the WWW site for EMC: http://www.emc.com/index.htm?fromGlobalSelector What makes the open access institutional repository workable is the Google search engine, which replaces traditional indexing and cataloging, making the repositories accessible. All I can tell you is that LSU Libraries is waiting for next year's budget, and, if it is what is being predicted, we are going to slash the hell out of our serials budget. But this no longer the big disaster it once was due to Google accessing Web sites and the efficiency of our ILL, which can get any article in 24 hours. SB ________________________________________ From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics on behalf of David Wojick Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 10:45 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline Dear Stephen, that is an interesting possibility, one of many in fact, but possibilities for change are not evidence of the unsustainability of the present system. In fact subscription revenues are still growing. Regarding your specifics, (1) I do not see how cheap computer space works selectively against subscription journals, as they can use it too. (2) Does your repository model eliminate journals altogether? If so then you face the loss of (a) peer review and (b) ranking by rejection, both of which are thought to be values added by journals, among others. But the relative merits of the many various OA models being tried out today are not really the issue here. Every proposal has merit or it would not be being tried out. I just see no evidence that any of them is about to replace the subscription system. Ironically their multiplicity is probably an obstacle in itself. David http://insidepublicaccess.com/ At 09:56 AM 7/4/2014, you wrote: >As for me, I am not arguing the case of the subscription system on its meri= >ts. It functioned well in its day. I am arguing the case on its brutal ec= >onomics. The subscription system is not financially efficient. It costs a= > lot to publish a journal, and editors are forcing authors to remain within= > size limits due to cost factors. Even then costs sky rocket because the p= >ublication universe is exponentially expanding. > > > >On the other hand, computer space has become very cheap. I have a nephew w= >orking for EMC, which makes and sells computer space. It started making mo= >ney hand over fist, and its stock went through the roof, enriching me. Whe= >n I asked him why, he said that its product became very cheap, and the comp= >any was able to reduce drastically the price on its product, exponentially = >expanding it sales. That is when a company really makes money. > > > >The logic here is to base the scientific information system not on publicat= >ion and journals but on computer space, which seems to be infinite and chea= >p. That is what is done by open access institutional repositories, which a= >re now feasible because the Google search engine can efficiently index them= > and retrieve from them. Technology has made the journal not only technolo= >gically outmoded but economically inefficient. As for scientometrics, ever= >ything human socially stratifies, and institutional repositories will also = >do this, and the game can go on. > > > >Stephen J. Bensman, Ph.D. > >Louisiana State University > >USA From anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM Tue Jul 8 01:26:55 2014 From: anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM (anup kumar das) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:56:55 +0530 Subject: Now Published -- Journal of Scientometric Research -- Volume 2, Issue 3 Message-ID: *Journal of Scientometric Research * Published by Wolters Kluwer Health - Medknow May-August 2013 Volume 2 | Issue 3 | Page Nos. 159-238 PDF access policy: Journal allows immediate open access to content in HTML + PDF Access Online: http://jscires.org/currentissue.asp?sabs=n Editorial p. 159 Sujit Bhattacharya RESEARCH ARTICLES Brazil's scientific production in mathematics: Contribution to mainstream science (2002-2011) p. 161 Renata Cristina Gutierres Castanha*, Maria Claudia Cabrini Gracio Temporal study of countries' scientific evolution based on two-dimensional approach p. 169 Seyyed Mehdi Hosseini Jenab A bibliometric analysis of a national Journal: The case of the Turkish Journal of Psychology Highly accessed article p. 173 Engin Arik Research trends in agricultural science: A global perspective p. 185 Anil Sagar, Basavaraj Shivappa Kademani, Karanam Bhanumurthy Transient and continuant authors in robotic medicine: A scientometric view p. 202 J.P.S Kumaravel, P Pricilla Rani, S Kalai Selvi Migration of scientists to novel areas of biomedical research: Role of article-related productivity p. 206 Igor Kissin, Edwin L Bradley Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships in West Africa p. 214 Eustache M?gnigb?to Cooperation in health: A cluster analysis of 190 research institutions p. 223 Pamela Barreto Lang, Fabio C Gouveia, Jacqueline Leta Why and where Wikipedia is cited in journal articles? p. 231 Fariba Tohidinasab, Hamid R Jamali *Access Online*: http://jscires.org/currentissue.asp?sabs=n Now Accepting Papers on* Patentometrics, Altmetrics, Webometrics, Cybermetrics, STI Indicators, Monitoring & Evaluation*. See *Instructions to the Authors* for further details: http://jscires.org/contributors.asp > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ksc at LIBRARY.IISC.ERNET.IN Tue Jul 8 03:07:54 2014 From: ksc at LIBRARY.IISC.ERNET.IN (K S Chudamani) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:37:54 +0530 Subject: PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline In-Reply-To: <1404562145981.87361@lsu.edu> Message-ID: We are discussing OA repository. The pros and cons of OA Repository should be examined thoroughly keeping in view classified research. In addition, millions of OA Repositories get installed whos3e access becomes chaotic (similar to internet) as against the current organised literature of journals (say, 20000). Libraries can cooperate in different manner to reduce their journal budgets. Chudamani On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > <1404482182407.55199 at lsu.edu>,<6.2.0.14.2.20140704112807.0443be50 at pop.craigellachie.us> > In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140704112807.0443be50 at pop.craigellachie.us> > Accept-Language: en-US > Content-Language: en-US > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > x-originating-ip: [99.14.201.175] > x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID: > x-forefront-prvs: 02638D901B > x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(6009001)(479174003)(377454003)(199002)(189002)(24454002)(51704005)(20776003)(19580405001)(74662001)(92566001)(79102001)(86362001)(74502001)(95666004)(105586002)(81542001)(81342001)(15202345003)(31966008)(99396002)(76176999)(19580395003)(83322001)(99286002)(92726001)(54356999)(2656002)(2171001)(15975445006)(46102001)(77096002)(561944003)(77982001)(93886003)(85306003)(107046002)(107886001)(21056001)(87936001)(15395725005)(66066001)(85852003)(101416001)(80022001)(75432001)(4396001)(2351001)(50986999)(64706001)(36756003)(76482001)(83072002)(106116001)(109986002)(89122001)(106356001)(88552001)(217873001);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1PR06MB173;H:CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;LANG:en; > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-OriginatorOrg: lsu.edu > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.utk.edu id s65C8NKq009522 > > David, > Thank you for giving my ideas serious consideration. > > I am not sure how this thing is going to work, because it is very complex. My model is arXiv, but there are other open access models. LSU is establishing a repository to give its faculty's research broader accessibility and post data for replication purposes as required by the NIH. I like the idea, because you can store and cite you own data online. The variables and procedures for an institutional depository are complex. > > There could be mixed models with publishers providing access to repositories for their titles. That seems to be the logic of some of these subscription contracts. The library provides a fixed sum based prior years' subscriptions, and the publisher gives access to its entire list beyond this core. That maintains cash flow but is open access in certain respects. We have access to Scientometrics on this basis. > > The basic idea is that computer space is cheap and unlimited, and you can get more bang for the buck by incorporating this concept. That kicks open the way for the expansion of the system which was being strangled by the journal system. The publishers were selling less and charging more, and that is the road to financial disaster. > > If you are interested in how this being done in business, here is the WWW site for EMC: > > http://www.emc.com/index.htm?fromGlobalSelector > > What makes the open access institutional repository workable is the Google search engine, which replaces traditional indexing and cataloging, making the repositories accessible. > > All I can tell you is that LSU Libraries is waiting for next year's budget, and, if it is what is being predicted, we are going to slash the hell out of our serials budget. But this no longer the big disaster it once was due to Google accessing Web sites and the efficiency of our ILL, which can get any article in 24 hours. > > SB > > > > ________________________________________ > From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics on behalf of David Wojick > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 10:45 AM > To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > Dear Stephen, that is an interesting possibility, one of many in fact, but > possibilities for change are not evidence of the unsustainability of the > present system. In fact subscription revenues are still growing. > > Regarding your specifics, (1) I do not see how cheap computer space works > selectively against subscription journals, as they can use it too. (2) Does > your repository model eliminate journals altogether? If so then you face > the loss of (a) peer review and (b) ranking by rejection, both of which are > thought to be values added by journals, among others. > > But the relative merits of the many various OA models being tried out today > are not really the issue here. Every proposal has merit or it would not be > being tried out. I just see no evidence that any of them is about to > replace the subscription system. Ironically their multiplicity is probably > an obstacle in itself. > > David > http://insidepublicaccess.com/ > > At 09:56 AM 7/4/2014, you wrote: > >> As for me, I am not arguing the case of the subscription system on its meri= >> ts. It functioned well in its day. I am arguing the case on its brutal ec= >> onomics. The subscription system is not financially efficient. It costs a= >> lot to publish a journal, and editors are forcing authors to remain within= >> size limits due to cost factors. Even then costs sky rocket because the p= >> ublication universe is exponentially expanding. >> >> >> >> On the other hand, computer space has become very cheap. I have a nephew w= >> orking for EMC, which makes and sells computer space. It started making mo= >> ney hand over fist, and its stock went through the roof, enriching me. Whe= >> n I asked him why, he said that its product became very cheap, and the comp= >> any was able to reduce drastically the price on its product, exponentially = >> expanding it sales. That is when a company really makes money. >> >> >> >> The logic here is to base the scientific information system not on publicat= >> ion and journals but on computer space, which seems to be infinite and chea= >> p. That is what is done by open access institutional repositories, which a= >> re now feasible because the Google search engine can efficiently index them= >> and retrieve from them. Technology has made the journal not only technolo= >> gically outmoded but economically inefficient. As for scientometrics, ever= >> ything human socially stratifies, and institutional repositories will also = >> do this, and the game can go on. >> >> >> >> Stephen J. Bensman, Ph.D. >> >> Louisiana State University >> >> USA > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From notsjb at LSU.EDU Tue Jul 8 11:19:23 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:19:23 +0000 Subject: PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Chud, You are right--the main problem is the lack of authority structure. But it should also be pointed out that WoS also suffers from the same problem of the lack of authority structure with problems with homonyms, etc. The only place where ISI maintains some authority structure is in the JCR, but I am on record with disagreeing with the way the JCR defines a journal, which is contrary to Library of Congress practice. I have been doing research that shows Google Scholar is pretty good at semantically defining relevant sets. If you are interested, go to the following URLs: http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+stephen+bensman/0/1/0/all/0/1 Here I am following John L. Lewis' dicturm: "He who tooteth not his own horn, that same shall not be tooteth." However, there is going to have to be a way of building an authority structure into this system. That problem is being worked upon. I am something of an expert on authority structure, having been certified as a RDA NACO cataloger by the Library of Congress. That means I define the way the name of a person or institution has to be entered into the Library of Congress Catalog, the OCLC World Catalog, and the National Authority File according to the new Resource Description & Access (RDA) cataloging rules. That same is being tooteth. Respectfully, Stephen J. Bensman, Ph.D. Louisiana State University USA This can overcome a lot of the authority problems but definitely not all. There is going to -----Original Message----- From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of K S Chudamani Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 2:08 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline We are discussing OA repository. The pros and cons of OA Repository should be examined thoroughly keeping in view classified research. In addition, millions of OA Repositories get installed whos3e access becomes chaotic (similar to internet) as against the current organised literature of journals (say, 20000). Libraries can cooperate in different manner to reduce their journal budgets. Chudamani On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Stephen J Bensman wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > <1404482182407.55199 at lsu.edu>,<6.2.0.14.2.20140704112807.0443be50 at pop. > craigellachie.us> > In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140704112807.0443be50 at pop.craigellachie.us> > Accept-Language: en-US > Content-Language: en-US > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > x-originating-ip: [99.14.201.175] > x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID: > x-forefront-prvs: 02638D901B > x-forefront-antispam-report: > SFV:NSPM;SFS:(6009001)(479174003)(377454003)(199002)(189002)(24454002) > (51704005)(20776003)(19580405001)(74662001)(92566001)(79102001)(863620 > 01)(74502001)(95666004)(105586002)(81542001)(81342001)(15202345003)(31 > 966008)(99396002)(76176999)(19580395003)(83322001)(99286002)(92726001) > (54356999)(2656002)(2171001)(15975445006)(46102001)(77096002)(56194400 > 3)(77982001)(93886003)(85306003)(107046002)(107886001)(21056001)(87936 > 001)(15395725005)(66066001)(85852003)(101416001)(80022001)(75432001)(4 > 396001)(2351001)(50986999)(64706001)(36756003)(76482001)(83072002)(106 > 116001)(109986002)(89122001)(106356001)(88552001)(217873001);DIR:OUT;S > FP:;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1PR06MB173;H:CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com;F > PR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;LANG:en; > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-OriginatorOrg: lsu.edu > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by > listserv.utk.edu id s65C8NKq009522 > > David, > Thank you for giving my ideas serious consideration. > > I am not sure how this thing is going to work, because it is very complex. My model is arXiv, but there are other open access models. LSU is establishing a repository to give its faculty's research broader accessibility and post data for replication purposes as required by the NIH. I like the idea, because you can store and cite you own data online. The variables and procedures for an institutional depository are complex. > > There could be mixed models with publishers providing access to repositories for their titles. That seems to be the logic of some of these subscription contracts. The library provides a fixed sum based prior years' subscriptions, and the publisher gives access to its entire list beyond this core. That maintains cash flow but is open access in certain respects. We have access to Scientometrics on this basis. > > The basic idea is that computer space is cheap and unlimited, and you can get more bang for the buck by incorporating this concept. That kicks open the way for the expansion of the system which was being strangled by the journal system. The publishers were selling less and charging more, and that is the road to financial disaster. > > If you are interested in how this being done in business, here is the WWW site for EMC: > > http://www.emc.com/index.htm?fromGlobalSelector > > What makes the open access institutional repository workable is the Google search engine, which replaces traditional indexing and cataloging, making the repositories accessible. > > All I can tell you is that LSU Libraries is waiting for next year's budget, and, if it is what is being predicted, we are going to slash the hell out of our serials budget. But this no longer the big disaster it once was due to Google accessing Web sites and the efficiency of our ILL, which can get any article in 24 hours. > > SB > > > > ________________________________________ > From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > on behalf of David Wojick > > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 10:45 AM > To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact > Factor Decline > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > Dear Stephen, that is an interesting possibility, one of many in fact, > but possibilities for change are not evidence of the unsustainability > of the present system. In fact subscription revenues are still growing. > > Regarding your specifics, (1) I do not see how cheap computer space > works selectively against subscription journals, as they can use it > too. (2) Does your repository model eliminate journals altogether? If > so then you face the loss of (a) peer review and (b) ranking by > rejection, both of which are thought to be values added by journals, among others. > > But the relative merits of the many various OA models being tried out > today are not really the issue here. Every proposal has merit or it > would not be being tried out. I just see no evidence that any of them > is about to replace the subscription system. Ironically their > multiplicity is probably an obstacle in itself. > > David > http://insidepublicaccess.com/ > > At 09:56 AM 7/4/2014, you wrote: > >> As for me, I am not arguing the case of the subscription system on >> its meri= ts. It functioned well in its day. I am arguing the case >> on its brutal ec= onomics. The subscription system is not >> financially efficient. It costs a= lot to publish a journal, and >> editors are forcing authors to remain within= size limits due to >> cost factors. Even then costs sky rocket because the p= ublication universe is exponentially expanding. >> >> >> >> On the other hand, computer space has become very cheap. I have a >> nephew w= orking for EMC, which makes and sells computer space. It >> started making mo= ney hand over fist, and its stock went through the >> roof, enriching me. Whe= n I asked him why, he said that its product >> became very cheap, and the comp= any was able to reduce drastically >> the price on its product, exponentially = expanding it sales. That is when a company really makes money. >> >> >> >> The logic here is to base the scientific information system not on >> publicat= ion and journals but on computer space, which seems to be >> infinite and chea= p. That is what is done by open access >> institutional repositories, which a= re now feasible because the >> Google search engine can efficiently index them= and retrieve from >> them. Technology has made the journal not only technolo= gically >> outmoded but economically inefficient. As for scientometrics, ever= >> ything human socially stratifies, and institutional repositories will also = do this, and the game can go on. >> >> >> >> Stephen J. Bensman, Ph.D. >> >> Louisiana State University >> >> USA > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE Wed Jul 9 03:21:57 2014 From: lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE (Bornmann, Lutz) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 07:21:57 +0000 Subject: paper Message-ID: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com Lutz Bornmann, Johann Bauer A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is freely available for downloading and includes the names of the researchers' institutions, we produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis of the number of highly cited researchers per institution. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM Wed Jul 9 03:40:26 2014 From: anupdas2072 at GMAIL.COM (anup kumar das) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 13:10:26 +0530 Subject: Policy Briefs & Strategy Papers from CSIR-NISTADS, India Message-ID: *Policy Briefs & Strategy Papers from CSIR-NISTADS * - "Dynamism in S&T and the role of S&T and Innovation policies in China: Lessons for India", by G.D. Sandhya; N. Mrinalini & Pradosh Nath. ISTIP Policy Bulletin No. 4, March 2014. Download Full-text PDF . - "Scientific Research in India: Drawing Insights from Bibliometric Indicators", by Sujit Bhattacharya, Shilpa & Arshia Kaul. ISTIP Policy Bulletin No. 3, January 2014. Download Full-text PDF . - "FDI in R&D in India: Policy Implications", by N.Mrinalini, Pradosh Nath and G.D.Sandhya. ISTIP Policy Bulletin No. 2, September 2013. Download Full-text PDF . - "Nanotechnology Development in India: Investigating Ten Years of India?s Efforts in Capacity Building", by Sujit Bhattacharya, Shilpa & A.P. Jayanthil. CSIR-NISTADS Strategy Paper on Nanotechnology, No. I, July 2012, NISTADS, India. Download Full-text PDF . - "Nanotechnology Research and Innovation in India: Drawing Insights from Bibliometric and Innovation Indicators", , by Sujit Bhattacharya, Shilpa & A.P. Jayanthil. CSIR-NISTADS Strategy Paper on Nanotechnology, No. II, July 2012, NISTADS, India. Download Full-text PDF . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Wed Jul 9 03:40:36 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:40:36 +0200 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <26D4503C9B0C8B43A20B92EF238B98AE168E0E7F@UM-EXCDAG-A04.um.gwdg.de> Message-ID: Dear colleagues, The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of the key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors point out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of these HCR, but dismiss it as according to the preprint ARWU is considering only primary affiliations. But after checking the published methodology in the ARWU website: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html the following paragraph appears: "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. These individuals are the most cited within each category. If a Highly Cited Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was asked to estimate his/her weights (or number of weeks) for each affiliation. More than 2/3 of those multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers provided such estimations and their affiliations receive the weights accordingly. For those who did not answer, their first affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight of the first affiliations for those who replied) and the rest affiliations share the remaining 16% equally". On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > > Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited > researchers? An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com > > Lutz Bornmann > , Johann > Bauer > > A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly cited > researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is freely > available for downloading and includes the names of the researchers' > institutions, we produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis > of the number of highly cited researchers per institution. > > Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 > > --------------------------------------- > > Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann > > Division for Science and Innovation Studies > > Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society > > Hofgartenstr. 8 > > 80539 Munich > > Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 > > Mobil: +49 170 9183667 > > Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de > > WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de > > ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 > > ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann > -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE Wed Jul 9 04:36:36 2014 From: lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE (Bornmann, Lutz) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:36:36 +0000 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <53BCF1F4.408@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the paper. Lutz From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear colleagues, The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of the key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors point out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of these HCR, but dismiss it as according to the preprint ARWU is considering only primary affiliations. But after checking the published methodology in the ARWU website: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html the following paragraph appears: "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. These individuals are the most cited within each category. If a Highly Cited Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was asked to estimate his/her weights (or number of weeks) for each affiliation. More than 2/3 of those multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers provided such estimations and their affiliations receive the weights accordingly. For those who did not answer, their first affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight of the first affiliations for those who replied) and the rest affiliations share the remaining 16% equally". On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com Lutz Bornmann, Johann Bauer A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is freely available for downloading and includes the names of the researchers' institutions, we produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis of the number of highly cited researchers per institution. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Wed Jul 9 04:52:20 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:52:20 +0200 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <26D4503C9B0C8B43A20B92EF238B98AE168E10DC@UM-EXCDAG-A04.um.gwdg.de> Message-ID: I checked the list a few days ago and I realized that probably co-authored highly cited papers are being credited equally to all of the authors. I suppose that Thomson Reuters is not using fractional counting or not identifying leaders ?? On 09/07/2014 10:36, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the paper. Lutz > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > Dear colleagues, > > The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of the > key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors point > out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of these HCR, > but dismiss it as according to the preprint ARWU is considering only > primary affiliations. But after checking the published methodology in > the ARWU website: > > http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html > > the following paragraph appears: > > "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. > These individuals are the most cited within each category. If a Highly > Cited Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was asked to > estimate his/her weights (or number of weeks) for each affiliation. > More than 2/3 of those multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers > provided such estimations and their affiliations receive the weights > accordingly. For those who did not answer, their first affiliation is > given a weight of 84% (average weight of the first affiliations for > those who replied) and the rest affiliations share the remaining 16% > equally". > > > On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > > Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited > researchers? An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com > > Lutz Bornmann > , Johann > Bauer > > A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly > cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is > freely available for downloading and includes the names of the > researchers' institutions, we produced a ranking of the > institutions on the basis of the number of highly cited > researchers per institution. > > Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 > > > --------------------------------------- > > Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann > > Division for Science and Innovation Studies > > Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society > > Hofgartenstr. 8 > > 80539 Munich > > Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 > > Mobil: +49 170 9183667 > > Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de > > WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de > > ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 > > ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann > > > > > -- > ****************************** > > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > Grupo Scimago > Madrid. SPAIN > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ > Twitter: @isidroaguillo > Rankings Web: webometrics.info > > ****************************** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de > avast! Antivirus est? activa. > -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE Wed Jul 9 05:07:00 2014 From: lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE (Bornmann, Lutz) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:07:00 +0000 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <53BD02C4.70508@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: I think TR uses full counting. Lutz From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:52 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html I checked the list a few days ago and I realized that probably co-authored highly cited papers are being credited equally to all of the authors. I suppose that Thomson Reuters is not using fractional counting or not identifying leaders ?? On 09/07/2014 10:36, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the paper. Lutz From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear colleagues, The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of the key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors point out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of these HCR, but dismiss it as according to the preprint ARWU is considering only primary affiliations. But after checking the published methodology in the ARWU website: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html the following paragraph appears: "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. These individuals are the most cited within each category. If a Highly Cited Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was asked to estimate his/her weights (or number of weeks) for each affiliation. More than 2/3 of those multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers provided such estimations and their affiliations receive the weights accordingly. For those who did not answer, their first affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight of the first affiliations for those who replied) and the rest affiliations share the remaining 16% equally". On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com Lutz Bornmann, Johann Bauer A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is freely available for downloading and includes the names of the researchers' institutions, we produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis of the number of highly cited researchers per institution. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Wed Jul 9 06:04:47 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:04:47 +0200 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <26D4503C9B0C8B43A20B92EF238B98AE168E1253@UM-EXCDAG-A04.um.gwdg.de> Message-ID: Soorry, that means you think there are "guests" in the list? On 09/07/2014 11:07, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > I think TR uses full counting. Lutz > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:52 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > I checked the list a few days ago and I realized that probably > co-authored highly cited papers are being credited equally to all of > the authors. I suppose that Thomson Reuters is not using fractional > counting or not identifying leaders ?? > > On 09/07/2014 10:36, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the paper. > Lutz > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > Dear colleagues, > > The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of > the key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors > point out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of > these HCR, but dismiss it as according to the preprint ARWU is > considering only primary affiliations. But after checking the > published methodology in the ARWU website: > > http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html > > the following paragraph appears: > > "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. > These individuals are the most cited within each category. If a > Highly Cited Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was > asked to estimate his/her weights (or number of weeks) for each > affiliation. More than 2/3 of those multi-affiliated Highly Cited > Researchers provided such estimations and their affiliations > receive the weights accordingly. For those who did not answer, > their first affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight > of the first affiliations for those who replied) and the rest > affiliations share the remaining 16% equally". > > > On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > > Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly > cited researchers? An evaluation of the data from > highlycited.com > > Lutz Bornmann > , > Johann Bauer > > > A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the > highly cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since > the data is freely available for downloading and includes the > names of the researchers' institutions, we produced a ranking > of the institutions on the basis of the number of highly cited > researchers per institution. > > Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 > > > --------------------------------------- > > Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann > > Division for Science and Innovation Studies > > Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society > > Hofgartenstr. 8 > > 80539 Munich > > Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 > > Mobil: +49 170 9183667 > > Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de > > WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de > > ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 > > ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann > > > > > > -- > > ****************************** > > > > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > > Grupo Scimago > > Madrid. SPAIN > > > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > > ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 > > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > > Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ > > Twitter: @isidroaguillo > > Rankings Web: webometrics.info > > > > ****************************** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de > avast! Antivirus est? activa. > > > > > -- > ****************************** > > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > Grupo Scimago > Madrid. SPAIN > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ > Twitter: @isidroaguillo > Rankings Web: webometrics.info > > ****************************** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de > avast! Antivirus est? activa. > -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE Wed Jul 9 06:42:14 2014 From: lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE (Bornmann, Lutz) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:42:14 +0000 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <53BD13BF.5070808@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: The relevant information is the affiliation given on the paper (independent of the status of a researcher in an institution). From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:05 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Soorry, that means you think there are "guests" in the list? On 09/07/2014 11:07, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: I think TR uses full counting. Lutz From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:52 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html I checked the list a few days ago and I realized that probably co-authored highly cited papers are being credited equally to all of the authors. I suppose that Thomson Reuters is not using fractional counting or not identifying leaders ?? On 09/07/2014 10:36, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the paper. Lutz From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Dear colleagues, The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of the key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors point out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of these HCR, but dismiss it as according to the preprint ARWU is considering only primary affiliations. But after checking the published methodology in the ARWU website: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html the following paragraph appears: "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. These individuals are the most cited within each category. If a Highly Cited Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was asked to estimate his/her weights (or number of weeks) for each affiliation. More than 2/3 of those multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers provided such estimations and their affiliations receive the weights accordingly. For those who did not answer, their first affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight of the first affiliations for those who replied) and the rest affiliations share the remaining 16% equally". On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com Lutz Bornmann, Johann Bauer A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is freely available for downloading and includes the names of the researchers' institutions, we produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis of the number of highly cited researchers per institution. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Wed Jul 9 06:47:36 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:47:36 +0200 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <26D4503C9B0C8B43A20B92EF238B98AE168E1559@UM-EXCDAG-A04.um.gwdg.de> Message-ID: I referred to the "status (role) of a researcher in a highly cited paper" On 09/07/2014 12:42, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > The relevant information is the affiliation given on the paper > (independent of the status of a researcher in an institution). > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:05 PM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > Soorry, that means you think there are "guests" in the list? > > On 09/07/2014 11:07, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > I think TR uses full counting. Lutz > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. Aguillo > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:52 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > I checked the list a few days ago and I realized that probably > co-authored highly cited papers are being credited equally to all > of the authors. I suppose that Thomson Reuters is not using > fractional counting or not identifying leaders ?? > > On 09/07/2014 10:36, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the > paper. Lutz > > *From:*ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Isidro F. > Aguillo > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM > *To:* SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > > *Subject:* Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > Dear colleagues, > > The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one > of the key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The > authors point out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" > of some of these HCR, but dismiss it as according to the > preprint ARWU is considering only primary affiliations. But > after checking the published methodology in the ARWU website: > > http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html > > the following paragraph appears: > > "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject > categories. These individuals are the most cited within each > category. If a Highly Cited Researcher has two or more > affiliations, he/she was asked to estimate his/her weights (or > number of weeks) for each affiliation. More than 2/3 of those > multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers provided such > estimations and their affiliations receive the weights > accordingly. For those who did not answer, their first > affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight of the > first affiliations for those who replied) and the rest > affiliations share the remaining 16% equally". > > > On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: > > > Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly > cited researchers? An evaluation of the data from > highlycited.com > > Lutz Bornmann > , > Johann Bauer > > > A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the > highly cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). > Since the data is freely available for downloading and > includes the names of the researchers' institutions, we > produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis of the > number of highly cited researchers per institution. > > Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 > > > --------------------------------------- > > Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann > > Division for Science and Innovation Studies > > Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society > > Hofgartenstr. 8 > > 80539 Munich > > Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 > > Mobil: +49 170 9183667 > > Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de > > WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de > > ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 > > ResearchGate: > http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann > > > > > > > -- > > ****************************** > > > > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > > Grupo Scimago > > Madrid. SPAIN > > > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > > ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 > > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > > Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ > > Twitter: @isidroaguillo > > Rankings Web: webometrics.info > > > > ****************************** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n > de avast! Antivirus est? activa. > > > > > > -- > > ****************************** > > > > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > > Grupo Scimago > > Madrid. SPAIN > > > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > > ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 > > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > > Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ > > Twitter: @isidroaguillo > > Rankings Web: webometrics.info > > > > ****************************** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de > avast! Antivirus est? activa. > > > > > -- > ****************************** > > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > Grupo Scimago > Madrid. SPAIN > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ > Twitter: @isidroaguillo > Rankings Web: webometrics.info > > ****************************** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de > avast! Antivirus est? activa. > -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gingras.yves at UQAM.CA Wed Jul 9 10:06:24 2014 From: gingras.yves at UQAM.CA (Yves Gingras) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:06:24 -0400 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <26D4503C9B0C8B43A20B92EF238B98AE168E10DC@UM-EXCDAG-A04.um.gwdg.de> Message-ID: Hello all In relation to these additional ?affiliations? one should also think about how it is manipulated to rise the rank of ?competing? institutions... On this topic See http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140204141307557 Your list will now be useful for the kind of institutions that just ?buy? people at a distance to get their address in their papers... This ?game? was made public by the journal Science in december 2011. See: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6061/1344.full Best regards Yves Gingras Le 09/07/14 04:36, ??Bornmann, Lutz?? a ?crit?: > Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the paper. Lutz > > > From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM > To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > Dear colleagues, > > The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of the key > variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors point out to > problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of these HCR, but dismiss it > as according to the preprint ARWU is considering only primary affiliations. > But after checking the published methodology in the ARWU website: > > http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html > > the following paragraph appears: > > "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. These > individuals are the most cited within each category. If a Highly Cited > Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was asked to estimate his/her > weights (or number of weeks) for each affiliation. More than 2/3 of those > multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers provided such estimations and their > affiliations receive the weights accordingly. For those who did not answer, > their first affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight of the first > affiliations for those who replied) and the rest affiliations share the > remaining 16% equally". > > > On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: >> Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? >> An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com >> Lutz Bornmann , >> Johann Bauer >> >> A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly cited >> researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is freely available >> for downloading and includes the names of the researchers' institutions, we >> produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis of the number of highly >> cited researchers per institution. >> >> Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 >> >> --------------------------------------- >> >> Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann >> Division for Science and Innovation Studies >> Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society >> Hofgartenstr. 8 >> 80539 Munich >> Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 >> Mobil: +49 170 9183667 >> Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de >> WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de >> ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 >> >> ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann >> >> > > Yves Gingras Professeur D?partement d'histoire Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) Chaire de recherche du Canada en histoire et sociologie des sciences Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) UQAM C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville Montr?al, Qu?bec Canada, H3C 3P8 Tel: (514)-987-3000-7053 Fax: (514)-987-7726 http://www.chss.uqam.ca http://www.cirst.uqam.ca http://www.ost.uqam.ca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From david.pendlebury at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Wed Jul 9 12:15:16 2014 From: david.pendlebury at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (David A. Pendlebury) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:15:16 +0000 Subject: paper In-Reply-To: <26D4503C9B0C8B43A20B92EF238B98AE168E1253@UM-EXCDAG-A04.um.gwdg.de> Message-ID: Dr. Bornmann is correct. Thomson Reuters used full, not fractional, counts. Details on the methodology employed for the new list of highly cited researchers can be found at: http://highlycited.com/info.htm -- David Pendlebury, Thomson Reuters ________________________________ From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Bornmann, Lutz Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:07 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper I think TR uses full counting. Lutz From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:52 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper I checked the list a few days ago and I realized that probably co-authored highly cited papers are being credited equally to all of the authors. I suppose that Thomson Reuters is not using fractional counting or not identifying leaders ?? On 09/07/2014 10:36, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: Thank you for this hint, Isidro! We will change this in the paper. Lutz From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:41 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] paper ml> Dear colleagues, The list analyzed by this paper is very important as it is one of the key variables used in ARWU, the Shanghai Ranking. The authors point out to problems in the "secondary affiliations" of some of these HCR, but dismiss it as according to the preprint ARWU is considering only primary affiliations. But after checking the published methodology in the ARWU website: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2013.html the following paragraph appears: "The number of Highly Cited Researchers in 21 subject categories. These individuals are the most cited within each category. If a Highly Cited Researcher has two or more affiliations, he/she was asked to estimate his/her weights (or number of weeks) for each affiliation. More than 2/3 of those multi-affiliated Highly Cited Researchers provided such estimations and their affiliations receive the weights accordingly. For those who did not answer, their first affiliation is given a weight of 84% (average weight of the first affiliations for those who replied) and the rest affiliations share the remaining 16% equally". On 09/07/2014 9:21, Bornmann, Lutz wrote: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An evaluation of the data from highlycited.com Lutz Bornmann, Johann Bauer A few weeks ago, Thomson Reuters published a list of the highly cited researchers worldwide (highlycited.com). Since the data is freely available for downloading and includes the names of the researchers' institutions, we produced a ranking of the institutions on the basis of the number of highly cited researchers per institution. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2037 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -- ****************************** Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info ****************************** ________________________________ [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png] Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From krpowel at EMORY.EDU Wed Jul 9 16:49:15 2014 From: krpowel at EMORY.EDU (Powell, Kimberly Robin) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 20:49:15 +0000 Subject: ASIS&T Sig/Met Student Paper contest Message-ID: Hello. Please find attached and below the 2014 Call for Student Papers from ASIS&T SIG/MET. Please excuse any cross postings and feel free to distribute widely. Please direct any questions regarding the contest or submission guidelines to Kim Powell at krpowel at emory.edu 2014 ASIS&T SIG/MET Student Paper Contest Are you tired of preparing papers which immediately migrate into your professors' files and have not been seen ever since? Recover your papers and give them a life and a great opportunity for yourself. Send your most promising papers to the 2014 ASIST SIG/MET Student paper contest where you have the chance to present your work in front of an interested audience, discuss it with established researchers, and win the ASIS&T SIG/MET Student Paper Award. This is the fourth annual student paper contest for SIG/MET, the Special Interest Group for the measurement of information production and use (http://www.asis.org/SIG/met.html)of the Association for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T). The contest is designed to recognize promising student research relating to the measurement of information, publication, and research and gives students a forum to meet the leaders of the field. Purpose SIG/MET seeks to encourage the development and networking opportunities of all those interested in the measurement of information. It is holding this contest to foster student growth and promote the generation of new ideas and research in metric-related topics, including bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, altmetrics and other related domains. Eligibility The first author of the paper entered into this contest must be a full-time student at the time of submission, irrespective of ASIS&T or SIG/MET membership. Only solo or first authored student manuscripts will be accepted, in order to ensure that the student made significant contributions to the work. SIG/MET reserves the right to request proof of enrollment as part of the submission and evaluation process. Submissions should not have been published work, although they may be submitted to a journal at the time of submission to the contest. Theme Papers should discuss theories, methods, policies, case studies, etc. on aspects of the measurement of information production and use. Topics could include, but are not limited to, the following core areas: * Metric-Related Theory * Methods and new techniques * Citation and co-citation analysis * Indicators * Web metrics * Information visualization * Research policy * Productivity * Journals, databases and electronic publications * Collaboration/Co-authorship * Patent analysis * Knowledge and topic diffusion * Altmetrics Selection Papers will be reviewed by SIG/MET officers and advisors to the SIG/MET workshop. At least one winner will be chosen. In the past, we have also given commendation to other particularly outstanding papers. Selection criteria include those that would be considered in traditional peer review: that is, the quality of the research, the presentation of the results, and the originality of the research question. Prizes The winner will be awarded a one-year individual membership to ASIS&T and a cash prize, sponsored by Elsevier. If of sufficient merit and pending available funds, two winners may be announced: one for the best first-authored paper and one for the best sole-authored paper. Authors of highly rated papers will be invited to submit a short biographical piece to be featured on the SIG/MET website. In addition, these authors may be invited to present their research under their own expense at the SIG/MET pre-conference workshop at the 2014 Annual ASIS&T Meeting. Format Submissions can be of any length and format, but should ideally reflect typical standards of a journal article (i.e., approximately 6,000 words and in an appropriate citation style for the social sciences). Submission & Deadline Authors are invited to submit manuscripts by midnight EST on Wednesday, August 13 2014, to the following website: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=sigmetspc2014 The students will be notified about the results by September 1, 2014. For inquiries and further information please contact Kim Powell (krpowel at emory.edu). SIGMET, a Special Interest Group for the measurement of information production and use of the Association for Information Science & Technology. It is designed to foster student research in metric-related topics: bibliometrics, scientometrics, atlmetrics, etc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SIGMET_StudentContest2014.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 187716 bytes Desc: SIGMET_StudentContest2014.pdf URL: From hanpark at YUMAIL.AC.KR Fri Jul 11 04:07:57 2014 From: hanpark at YUMAIL.AC.KR (Prof. Han Woo Park) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:07:57 +0900 Subject: SIGMETRICS: Invitation DISC 2014 and TFSC Special Issue Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noyons at CWTS.LEIDENUNIV.NL Fri Jul 11 05:46:53 2014 From: noyons at CWTS.LEIDENUNIV.NL (Noijons, E.) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:46:53 +0000 Subject: STI 2014 - registarion early bird Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Please note that the early bird registration for the STI 2014 conference is due tomorrow (12 July 2014). If you wish to benefit from the discount, don't forget to register today or tomorrow at the conference website (sti2014.cwts.nl) A line-up of sessions and papers is available at the conference website. Early next week we will publish a preliminary program. Hope to meet you in Leiden Ed Noyons, Program chair Attached: short announcement - Dr Ed Noyons CWTS, Leiden University (www.cwts.nl) STI 2014 (sti2014.cwts.nl) + 31 71 5273909/ noyons at cwts.leidenuniv.nl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: announcement STI_2014_11july.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 573556 bytes Desc: announcement STI_2014_11july.pdf URL: From d.herrmannova at GMAIL.COM Fri Jul 11 06:32:26 2014 From: d.herrmannova at GMAIL.COM (Drahomira Herrmannova) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:32:26 +0100 Subject: Deadline Extension | DL 2014: 3rd International Workshop on Mining Scientific Publications Message-ID: Dear All, This is to announce that the *submission deadline* of the WOSP 2014 workshop has been extended to *Sunday 20th July 2014*. We are also pleased to announce that this year's keynote speakers will be Prof. C. Lee Giles from Pennsylvania State University and Prof. Birger Larsen from Aalborg University Copenhagen. For information about the topics, please visit http://core-project.kmi.open.ac.uk/dl2014/#keynotes With kind regards, On behalf of the organising committee Drahomira http://core-project.kmi.open.ac.uk/dl2014/ http://twitter.com/WOSP2014 --- CALL FOR PAPERS 12th September, 2014 ? London, United Kingdom Workshop page: http://core-project.kmi.open.ac.uk/dl2014/ Conference page: http://www.dl2014.org 1. INTRODUCTION Digital libraries that store scientific publications are becoming increasingly central to the research process. They are not only used for traditional tasks, such as finding and storing research outputs, but also as a source for discovering new research trends or evaluating research excellence. With the current growth of scientific publications deposited in digital libraries, it is no longer sufficient to provide only access to content. To aid research it is especially important to improve the process of how research is being done. The recent development in natural language processing, information retrieval and the semantic web make it possible to transform the way we work with scientific publications. However, in order to be able to improve these technologies and carry out experiments, researchers need to be able to easily access and use large databases of scientific publications. This workshop aims to bring together people from different backgrounds who: (a) are interested in analysing and mining databases of scientific publications, (b) develop systems that enable such analysis and mining of scientific databases or (c) who develop novel technologies that improve the way research is being done. 2. TOPICS The topics of the workshop will be organised around the following themes: 1) The whole ecosystem of infrastructures including repositories, aggregators, text-and data-mining facilities, impact monitoring tools, datasets, services and APIs that enable analysis of large volumes of scientific publications. 2) Semantic enrichment of scientific publications by means of text-mining, crowdsourcing or other methods. 3) Analysis of large databases of scientific publications to identify research trends, high impact, cross-fertilisation between disciplines, research excellence etc. Topics of interest relevant to theme 1 include, but are not limited to: - Infrastructures including repositories, aggregators, text-and data-mining facilities, impact monitoring tools, datasets, services and APIs for accessing scientific publications and/or research data. The existence of datasets, services, systems and APIs (in particular those that are open) providing access to large volumes of scientific publications and research data, is an essential prerequisite for being able to research and develop new technologies that can transform the way people do research. Topics of interest relevant to theme 2 include, but are not limited to: - Novel information extraction and text-mining approaches to semantic enrichment of publications. - Automatic categorization and clustering of scientific publications. - New methods and models for connecting and interlinking scientific publications. - Models for semantically representing and annotating publications. - Semantically enriching/annotating publications by crowdsourcing. Topics of interest relevant to theme 3 include, but are not limited to: - New methods, models and innovative approaches for measuring impact of publications. - New methods for measuring performance of researchers. - Evaluating impact of research groups. - Methods for identifying research trends and cross-fertilization between research disciplines. - Application and case studies of mining from scientific databases and publications. - Improving the infrastructure of repositories to support the development and integration of new impact and performance metrics. 3. SPECIAL OPEN PUBLICATIONS DATASET TRACK This year we would like to invite the workshop participants to make use of the CORE publications dataset containing large volume of research publications from a wide variety of research areas. The dataset contains not only full-texts, but also an enriched version of publications? metadata. This dataset provides a framework for developing and testing methods and tools addressing the workshop topics. The use of this dataset is not mandatory, however it is encouraged. The dataset is available for download at http://core.kmi.open.ac.uk/intro/data_dumps. 4. EXPECTED AUDIENCE The workshop on Mining Scientific Publications aims to bring together researchers, digital library developers and practitioners from government and industry to address the current challenges in the domain of mining scientific publications. 5. SUBMISSION FORMAT We invite submissions related to the workshop?s topics. Long papers should not exceed 8 pages and short papers should not exceed 4 pages of the ACM style. Furthermore, we welcome demo presentations of systems or methods. A demonstration submission should consist of a maximum two page description of the system, method or tool to be demonstrated. 6. IMPORTANT DATES July 20, 2014 - New submission deadline August 11, 2014 - Notification of acceptance August 25, 2014 - Camera-ready September 12, 2014 - Workshop The dates are at this stage indicative only and can change. 7. KEYNOTE SPEAKERS The workshop will include keynote presentations from Dr. C. Lee Giles and Prof. Birger Larsen. More information about the keynotes is available at http://core-project.kmi.open.ac.uk/dl2014/#keynotes. 8. PUBLICATION Articles presented at this workshop will be published in the November issue of D-Lib (http://www.dlib.org/). Proceedings from the previous workshops are also available here. 9. ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Petr Knoth, Knowledge Media institute, The Open University, UK Zdenek Zdrahal, Knowledge Media institute, The Open University, UK Stelio Piperidis, Institute for Language and Speech processing (META-SHARE), Athena Research Center, Greece Nuno Freire, The European Library, The Netherlands Kris Jack, Mendeley Ltd., United Kingdom Drahomira Herrmannova, Knowledge Media institute, The Open University, UK Lucas Anastasiou, Knowledge Media institute, The Open University, UK More details available on the workshop website: http://core-project.kmi.open.ac.uk/dl2014/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Fri Jul 11 20:15:15 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 20:15:15 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse Message-ID: On Jul 11, 2014, at 6:34 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: *SH: *CHORUS is a Trojan Horse, designed so that publishers retain control over the timing, terms and territory of any transition to Open Access. Think about it. http://j.mp/TrojanHorseChorus David Wojick replied (in the SSP Scholarly Kitchen): *DW:* Nonsense! It is the Feds that are asserting control via the US Public Access program. CHORUS is an attempt to minimize the damage that more Federal repositories like PMC will cause. CHORUS will improve scientific communication while reducing Federal expenses. It is an elegant solution to a difficult problem. *SH:* The Feds are (rightly) asserting control over the research output that the public funds by mandating public access to it. Doesn?t sound like nonsense to me. (Some) publishers are trying to slow the provision of public access to publicly funded research (by embargoing it) and are angling to remain the ones who provide the access, so that they retain control and proprietorship over both the research output and the provision of access to it. That doesn?t sound like nonsense to me either ? just self-interest in a profound conflict of interest between those who fund, conduct and provide the research output (the Feds, the public, and researchers) on the one hand, and those who manage the peer review of that research output (publishers). The peers (researchers) review for free. It is not nonsense to attempt to hold onto a cushy deal by ?minimizing the damage? for as long as possible to the inflated income streams to which they have long grown accustomed. The Feds, the public, and researchers can only hope that this damage-limitation attempt will fail. And it will -- though perhaps not until after yet another round of delay tactics, of which CHORUS and the lobbying for it are a prominent instance. *Stevan Harnad* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Fri Jul 11 21:41:24 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 21:41:24 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Stevan, Why are you trying to move the discussion here from the Scholarly Kitchen? Few of their readers are members here. They are the scholarly communication community, not the metrics community. This is very strange. Moreover, TSK is an open forum while this is a closed one. David Wojick On Jul 11, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > On Jul 11, 2014, at 6:34 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > >> >> >>> SH: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse, designed so that publishers retain control over the timing, terms and territory of any transition to Open Access. Think about it. http://j.mp/TrojanHorseChorus > > David Wojick replied (in the SSP Scholarly Kitchen): > >> DW: Nonsense! It is the Feds that are asserting control via the US Public Access program. CHORUS is an attempt to minimize the damage that more Federal repositories like PMC will cause. CHORUS will improve scientific communication while reducing >> Federal expenses. It is an elegant solution to a difficult problem. > > SH: The Feds are (rightly) asserting control over the research output that the public funds by mandating public access to it. Doesn?t sound like nonsense to me. (Some) publishers are trying to slow the provision of public access to publicly funded research (by embargoing it) and are angling to remain the ones who provide the access, so that they retain control and proprietorship over both the research output and the provision of access to it. That doesn?t sound like nonsense to me either ? just self-interest in a profound conflict of interest > between those who fund, conduct and provide the research output (the Feds, the public, and researchers) on the one hand, and those who manage the peer review of that research output (publishers). The peers (researchers) review for free. It is not nonsense to attempt to hold onto a cushy deal by ?minimizing the damage? for as long as possible to the inflated income streams to which they have long grown accustomed. The Feds, the public, and researchers can only hope that this damage-limitation attempt will fail. And it will -- though perhaps not until after yet another round of delay tactics, of which CHORUS and the lobbying for it are a prominent instance. > > Stevan Harnad > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From harnad at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK Fri Jul 11 21:44:10 2014 From: harnad at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK (Stevan Harnad) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 21:44:10 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <436B221F-F162-4428-8AAE-0102BAC3647A@craigellachie.us> Message-ID: On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:41 PM, David Wojick wrote: > Stevan, > > Why are you trying to move the discussion here from the Scholarly Kitchen? Few of their readers are members here. They are the scholarly communication community, not the metrics community. This is very strange. Moreover, TSK is an open forum while this is a closed one. There has been plenty of discussion on this topic here, and it is pertinent for many readers. Why don?t you just reply to the points I make? TSK is a highly partisan forum (see the predictable patterns of thumbs up and down). Here the matters get a more even-handed airing. Stevan Harnad > > David Wojick > > On Jul 11, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> On Jul 11, 2014, at 6:34 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: >> >>>> SH: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse, designed so that publishers retain control over the timing, terms and territory of any transition to Open Access. Think about it. http://j.mp/TrojanHorseChorus >> >> David Wojick replied (in the SSP Scholarly Kitchen): >> >>> DW: Nonsense! It is the Feds that are asserting control via the US Public Access program. CHORUS is an attempt to minimize the damage that more Federal repositories like PMC will cause. CHORUS will improve scientific communication while reducing >>> Federal expenses. It is an elegant solution to a difficult problem. >> >> SH: The Feds are (rightly) asserting control over the research output that the public funds by mandating public access to it. Doesn?t sound like nonsense to me. (Some) publishers are trying to slow the provision of public access to publicly funded research (by embargoing it) and are angling to remain the ones who provide the access, so that they retain control and proprietorship over both the research output and the provision of access to it. That doesn?t sound like nonsense to me either ? just self-interest in a profound conflict of interest >> between those who fund, conduct and provide the research output (the Feds, the public, and researchers) on the one hand, and those who manage the peer review of that research output (publishers). The peers (researchers) review for free. It is not nonsense to attempt to hold onto a cushy deal by ?minimizing the damage? for as long as possible to the inflated income streams to which they have long grown accustomed. The Feds, the public, and researchers can only hope that this damage-limitation attempt will fail. And it will -- though perhaps not until after yet another round of delay tactics, of which CHORUS and the lobbying for it are a prominent instance. >> >> Stevan Harnad >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Sat Jul 12 07:14:36 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 07:14:36 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <836E0620-6EA8-4C21-88AD-5AD4AE4F3939@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Message-ID: Okay Stevan. The timing, terms and territory of the U.S. Public Access program are all controlled by the Feds. To claim otherwise is nonsense. The publishers have no control whatsoever. Which federal agencies, if any, will use CHORUS is completely up to those agencies. If it is not going your way that is the choice of the Feds, not the publishers. The relevant documents can be found in the links embedded in my synopses here: http://insidepublicaccess.com/issues.html David Wojick http://insidepublicaccess.com/ On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:41 PM, David Wojick wrote: > >> Stevan, >> >> Why are you trying to move the discussion here from the Scholarly Kitchen? Few of their readers are members here. They are the scholarly communication community, not the metrics community. This is very strange. Moreover, TSK is an open forum while this is a closed one. > > There has been plenty of discussion on this topic here, and it is pertinent for many readers. > > Why don?t you just reply to the points I make? TSK is a highly partisan forum (see the predictable patterns of thumbs up and down). Here the matters get a more even-handed airing. > > Stevan Harnad > >> >> David Wojick >> >> On Jul 11, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote: >> >>> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >>> On Jul 11, 2014, at 6:34 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> SH: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse, designed so that publishers retain control over the timing, terms and territory of any transition to Open Access. Think about it. http://j.mp/TrojanHorseChorus >>> >>> David Wojick replied (in the SSP Scholarly Kitchen): >>> >>>> DW: Nonsense! It is the Feds that are asserting control via the US Public Access program. CHORUS is an attempt to minimize the damage that more Federal repositories like PMC will cause. CHORUS will improve scientific communication while reducing >>>> Federal expenses. It is an elegant solution to a difficult problem. >>> >>> SH: The Feds are (rightly) asserting control over the research output that the public funds by mandating public access to it. Doesn?t sound like nonsense to me. (Some) publishers are trying to slow the provision of public access to publicly funded research (by embargoing it) and are angling to remain the ones who provide the access, so that they retain control and proprietorship over both the research output and the provision of access to it. That doesn?t sound like nonsense to me either ? just self-interest in a profound conflict of interest >>> between those who fund, conduct and provide the research output (the Feds, the public, and researchers) on the one hand, and those who manage the peer review of that research output (publishers). The peers (researchers) review for free. It is not nonsense to attempt to hold onto a cushy deal by ?minimizing the damage? for as long as possible to the inflated income streams to which they have long grown accustomed. The Feds, the public, and researchers can only hope that this damage-limitation attempt will fail. And it will -- though perhaps not until after yet another round of delay tactics, of which CHORUS and the lobbying for it are a prominent instance. >>> >>> Stevan Harnad >>> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From krichel at OPENLIB.ORG Sat Jul 12 07:38:27 2014 From: krichel at OPENLIB.ORG (Thomas Krichel) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 11:38:27 +0000 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <5AD01CA8-3975-44D1-BCD7-66C61A664B72@craigellachie.us> Message-ID: David Wojick writes > The publishers have no control whatsoever. But plenty of lobbying power, created by libraries spending insane amounts of money on subscriptions for many years. -- Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel skype:thomaskrichel From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Sat Jul 12 08:57:40 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:57:40 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <20140712113827.GA27804@openlib.org> Message-ID: Dear Thomas, Generally speaking one does not lobby Executive branch agencies. You can lobby Congress because they are the decision makers of democracy, so must listen to everyone. But the executive agencies are the enforcers, the police if you like. The publishers have had a few polite meetings with OSTP and the agency group but that is about it. We are all just waiting to see what the Feds are going to do. Also, scholarly publishing is far too small to have "lobbying power." It is a tiny industry, almost beneath notice. Most of the funding agencies do not even want to do public access. It is just a bother to them. They fund research. In fact the House and Senate have both told them to get going. See the synopsis of my June 19 issue of IPA for links to the Congressional documents: http://insidepublicaccess.com/issues.htm There is nothing insane about journal prices. The journals are moving two million articles a year. David On Jul 12, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Thomas Krichel wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > David Wojick writes > >> The publishers have no control whatsoever. > > But plenty of lobbying power, created by libraries spending insane > amounts of money on subscriptions for many years. > > -- > > Cheers, > > Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel > skype:thomaskrichel From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Sat Jul 12 09:19:12 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 09:19:12 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse Message-ID: On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, David Wojick wrote: > *DW: *The timing, terms and territory of the U.S. Public Access program > are all controlled by the Feds. > "The Feds," as we all know, are government decision-makers whose decisions are influenced by lobbying. The research community, though it is huge, cannot afford -- and hence does not have -- a lobby. The publishing industry, in contrast, has oodles of dosh for lobbying "The Feds," and does so, vigorously, particularly about Open Access (OA), over which the publishing industry is desperately trying to retain control. In the US, this attempt to retain control takes the form of CHORUS: "*Let us handle OA for you; we will see to it that (our) articles are made OA at the end of (our!) OA embargoes; we will host or deposit our versions of our articles for you*." That is how the publishing lobby is trying to retain control over the timing, terms and territory of the US Public Access program. > *DW:* To claim otherwise is nonsense. > (I imagine that when you are lobbying or consulting for the Feds you express yourself more courteously, David.) > *DW:* The publishers have no control whatsoever. Which federal agencies, > if any, will use CHORUS is completely up to those agencies. > The publishers have no control over what policy "the Feds" ultimately adopt, fortunately. They are merely trying to lobby to get them to cede the control to them, by adopting CHORUS. And you, David, as a consultant for OSTI, are attempting to incline them toward adopting CHORUS. In this, I think you are as profoundly mistaken as you have been in your prior advocacy against measures to combat global warming . *DW: *If it is not going your way that is the choice of the Feds, not the > publishers. > I am not a professional consultant or lobbyist. I am a researcher, and "my way" is what I think is best for research, researchers, their institutions, their funders, and the general public whose taxes pay for the research and for whose benefit the research is conducted. And mandatory Green Open Access Self-Archiving is not "my way" but the way of 271 institutions and 90 Funders . It is one of those funders (OSTI) that you are endeavouring to steer toward CHORUS. I and others are trying to alert all OA policy-makers to the fact that CHORUS is a Trojan Horse and very much against the interests of the scale and speed of growth of Open Access. *Stevan Harnad* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Sat Jul 12 09:26:33 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 09:26:33 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: One DOE's not lobby Executive agencies. The embargo periods will be set by the Feds. It is better to send users to the publisher's website than to a federal repository of accepted manuscripts, also cheaper. David Sent from my IPad On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, David Wojick wrote: > > DW: The timing, terms and territory of the U.S. Public Access program are all controlled by the Feds. > > "The Feds," as we all know, are government decision-makers whose decisions are influenced by lobbying. The research community, though it is huge, cannot afford -- and hence does not have -- a lobby. The publishing industry, in contrast, has oodles of dosh for lobbying "The Feds," and does so, vigorously, particularly about Open Access (OA), over which the publishing industry is desperately trying to retain control. > > In the US, this attempt to retain control takes the form of CHORUS: "Let us handle OA for you; we will see to it that (our) articles are made OA at the end of (our!) OA embargoes; we will host or deposit our versions of our articles for you." > > That is how the publishing lobby is trying to retain control over the timing, terms and territory of the US Public Access program. > > DW: To claim otherwise is nonsense. > > (I imagine that when you are lobbying or consulting for the Feds you express yourself more courteously, David.) > > DW: The publishers have no control whatsoever. Which federal agencies, if any, will use CHORUS is completely up to those agencies. > > The publishers have no control over what policy "the Feds" ultimately adopt, fortunately. They are merely trying to lobby to get them to cede the control to them, by adopting CHORUS. > > And you, David, as a consultant for OSTI, are attempting to incline them toward adopting CHORUS. In this, I think you are as profoundly mistaken as you have been in your prior advocacy against measures to combat global warming. > > DW: If it is not going your way that is the choice of the Feds, not the publishers. > > I am not a professional consultant or lobbyist. I am a researcher, and "my way" is what I think is best for research, researchers, their institutions, their funders, and the general public whose taxes pay for the research and for whose benefit the research is conducted. > > And mandatory Green Open Access Self-Archiving is not "my way" but the way of 271 institutions and 90 Funders. It is one of those funders (OSTI) that you are endeavouring to steer toward CHORUS. I and others are trying to alert all OA policy-makers to the fact that CHORUS is a Trojan Horse and very much against the interests of the scale and speed of growth of Open Access. > > Stevan Harnad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amsciforum at GMAIL.COM Sat Jul 12 10:05:30 2014 From: amsciforum at GMAIL.COM (Stevan Harnad) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:05:30 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:57 AM, David Wojick wrote: > The embargo periods will be set by the Feds. > The embargo periods are set by the *publishers*. The Feds only set what is the longest embargo period they will allow. > It is better to send users to the publisher's website than to a federal > repository of accepted manuscripts, also cheaper. It's neither better nor cheaper. But it's best to send users where they already go: the indexes, harvesters and search engines. Those in turn are best to harvest from *the researchers' own institutional repositories*, which happen to be the providers of all the research output, and are in the best position to monitor and ensure that all OA mandates -- institutional mandates and funder mandates -- are complied with for their own output. And distributed institutional repositories are much cheaper than central ones (which would in turm be much cheaper if they simply harvested the metadata from the institutional repositories). Generally speaking one does not lobby Executive branch agencies. No; but lobbyists can *consult* for them... > The publishers have had a few polite meetings with OSTP and the agency > group but that is about it. We are all just waiting to see what the Feds > are going to do. Also, scholarly publishing is far too small to have > "lobbying power." It is a tiny industry, almost beneath notice. > I think past and ongoing anti-OA lobbying attempts by the "tiny" publishing industry have been quite large-scale, and are a matter of public record: PRISM , EU , RWA , Finch , etc. etc. *Stevan Harnad* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Sat Jul 12 10:08:46 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:08:46 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <9B80A3A9-D6CE-4734-9A01-D519612E6FB5@craigellachie.us> Message-ID: Sorry that is does not DOE's. My IPad keeps changing it. Ironically my biggest complaint is that the Feds have not consulted with the publishers in designing the PA system. The Feds know little about scholarly publishing, except NIH of course. David Sent from my IPad On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:26 AM, David Wojick wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > One DOE's not lobby Executive agencies. > The embargo periods will be set by the Feds. > It is better to send users to the publisher's website than to a federal repository of accepted manuscripts, also cheaper. > > David > > Sent from my IPad > > On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote: > >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, David Wojick wrote: >> >> DW: The timing, terms and territory of the U.S. Public Access program are all controlled by the Feds. >> >> "The Feds," as we all know, are government decision-makers whose decisions are influenced by lobbying. The research community, though it is huge, cannot afford -- and hence does not have -- a lobby. The publishing industry, in contrast, has oodles of dosh for lobbying "The Feds," and does so, vigorously, particularly about Open Access (OA), over which the publishing industry is desperately trying to retain control. >> >> In the US, this attempt to retain control takes the form of CHORUS: "Let us handle OA for you; we will see to it that (our) articles are made OA at the end of (our!) OA embargoes; we will host or deposit our versions of our articles for you." >> >> That is how the publishing lobby is trying to retain control over the timing, terms and territory of the US Public Access program. >> >> DW: To claim otherwise is nonsense. >> >> (I imagine that when you are lobbying or consulting for the Feds you express yourself more courteously, David.) >> >> DW: The publishers have no control whatsoever. Which federal agencies, if any, will use CHORUS is completely up to those agencies. >> >> The publishers have no control over what policy "the Feds" ultimately adopt, fortunately. They are merely trying to lobby to get them to cede the control to them, by adopting CHORUS. >> >> And you, David, as a consultant for OSTI, are attempting to incline them toward adopting CHORUS. In this, I think you are as profoundly mistaken as you have been in your prior advocacy against measures to combat global warming. >> >> DW: If it is not going your way that is the choice of the Feds, not the publishers. >> >> I am not a professional consultant or lobbyist. I am a researcher, and "my way" is what I think is best for research, researchers, their institutions, their funders, and the general public whose taxes pay for the research and for whose benefit the research is conducted. >> >> And mandatory Green Open Access Self-Archiving is not "my way" but the way of 271 institutions and 90 Funders. It is one of those funders (OSTI) that you are endeavouring to steer toward CHORUS. I and others are trying to alert all OA policy-makers to the fact that CHORUS is a Trojan Horse and very much against the interests of the scale and speed of growth of Open Access. >> >> Stevan Harnad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Christina.Pikas at JHUAPL.EDU Mon Jul 14 09:59:44 2014 From: Christina.Pikas at JHUAPL.EDU (Pikas, Christina K.) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:59:44 +0000 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <08E7C923-62C2-4543-9C1C-E91510A320BE@craigellachie.us> Message-ID: 1) Thank you for moving this to the listserv as I refuse to give click traffic to the other site 2) Perhaps lobbying is not the correct term, but organizations with money have many ways to work to influence executive branch agencies. The explicit way is to comment on proposed rules (I think this is the preferred place, now: http://www.regulations.gov/#!home), but there are many ways prior to that. 3) Federal agencies do indeed know a lot about publishing. At least EPA, DTIC, Education, FDA, DOJ, DOT, and others that I have had contact with do. I have heard some pushback in DoD about the burden enforcing compliance will be for funders. But as a veteran, I can tell you that if military folks (including DoD civilians and contractors) are not complaining about something, then they?re probably ignoring it! It could be that the correct, knowledgeable people in various parts of massive departments are not the most vocal. Christina Any statements here are my own and do not reflect anything from my employer. Actually they?re mostly based on my experience as active duty Navy and as an EPA contractor. From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu] On Behalf Of David Wojick Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 10:09 AM To: SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] CHORUS is a Trojan Horse Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html Sorry that is does not DOE's. My IPad keeps changing it. Ironically my biggest complaint is that the Feds have not consulted with the publishers in designing the PA system. The Feds know little about scholarly publishing, except NIH of course. David Sent from my IPad On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:26 AM, David Wojick > wrote: Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html One DOE's not lobby Executive agencies. The embargo periods will be set by the Feds. It is better to send users to the publisher's website than to a federal repository of accepted manuscripts, also cheaper. David Sent from my IPad On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Stevan Harnad > wrote: Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, David Wojick > wrote: DW: The timing, terms and territory of the U.S. Public Access program are all controlled by the Feds. "The Feds," as we all know, are government decision-makers whose decisions are influenced by lobbying. The research community, though it is huge, cannot afford -- and hence does not have -- a lobby. The publishing industry, in contrast, has oodles of dosh for lobbying "The Feds," and does so, vigorously, particularly about Open Access (OA), over which the publishing industry is desperately trying to retain control. In the US, this attempt to retain control takes the form of CHORUS: "Let us handle OA for you; we will see to it that (our) articles are made OA at the end of (our!) OA embargoes; we will host or deposit our versions of our articles for you." That is how the publishing lobby is trying to retain control over the timing, terms and territory of the US Public Access program. DW: To claim otherwise is nonsense. (I imagine that when you are lobbying or consulting for the Feds you express yourself more courteously, David.) DW: The publishers have no control whatsoever. Which federal agencies, if any, will use CHORUS is completely up to those agencies. The publishers have no control over what policy "the Feds" ultimately adopt, fortunately. They are merely trying to lobby to get them to cede the control to them, by adopting CHORUS. And you, David, as a consultant for OSTI, are attempting to incline them toward adopting CHORUS. In this, I think you are as profoundly mistaken as you have been in your prior advocacy against measures to combat global warming. DW: If it is not going your way that is the choice of the Feds, not the publishers. I am not a professional consultant or lobbyist. I am a researcher, and "my way" is what I think is best for research, researchers, their institutions, their funders, and the general public whose taxes pay for the research and for whose benefit the research is conducted. And mandatory Green Open Access Self-Archiving is not "my way" but the way of 271 institutions and 90 Funders. It is one of those funders (OSTI) that you are endeavouring to steer toward CHORUS. I and others are trying to alert all OA policy-makers to the fact that CHORUS is a Trojan Horse and very much against the interests of the scale and speed of growth of Open Access. Stevan Harnad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Mon Jul 14 12:51:09 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:51:09 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <0064f2879e594294a830c7123f4f7da3@APLEX09.dom1.jhuapl.edu> Message-ID: Dear Christina, It is true that many agencies publish their final reports. DOE OSTI is arguably the world's largest grey literature publisher/aggregator. But I am not aware of any of the agencies you list running a repository for journal articles, which is what I refer to as scholarly publishing. Perhaps I have missed them. Can you point to one? It is a very complex process, as PMC shows. David At 09:59 AM 7/14/2014, you wrote: >1) Thank you for moving this to the listserv as I refuse to give >click traffic to the other site >2) Perhaps lobbying is not the correct term, but organizations with >money have many ways to work to influence executive branch agencies. The >explicit way is to comment on proposed rules (I think this is the >preferred place, now: >http://www.regulations.gov/#!home), but >there are many ways prior to that. >3) Federal agencies do indeed know a lot about publishing. At least >EPA, DTIC, Education, FDA, DOJ, DOT, and others that I have had contact >with do. I have heard some pushback in DoD about the burden enforcing >compliance will be for funders. But as a veteran, I can tell you that if >military folks (including DoD civilians and contractors) are not >complaining about something, then they???re probably ignoring it! It could >be that the correct, knowledgeable people in various parts of massive >departments are not the most vocal. > >Christina > >Any statements here are my own and do not reflect anything from my >employer. Actually they???re mostly based on my experience as active duty >Navy and as an EPA contractor. > >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu] On Behalf Of David Wojick >Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 10:09 AM >To: SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] CHORUS is a Trojan Horse > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >Sorry that is does not DOE's. My IPad keeps changing it. > >Ironically my biggest complaint is that the Feds have not consulted with >the publishers in designing the PA system. The Feds know little about >scholarly publishing, except NIH of course. > >David > >Sent from my IPad > >On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:26 AM, David Wojick ><dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US> wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >One DOE's not lobby Executive agencies. >The embargo periods will be set by the Feds. >It is better to send users to the publisher's website than to a federal >repository of accepted manuscripts, also cheaper. > >David > >Sent from my IPad > >On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Stevan Harnad ><amsciforum at GMAIL.COM> wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, David Wojick ><dwojick at craigellachie.us> wrote: > >DW: The timing, terms and territory of the U.S. Public Access program are >all controlled by the Feds. > > >"The Feds," as we all know, are government decision-makers whose decisions >are influenced by lobbying. The research community, though it is huge, >cannot afford -- and hence does not have -- a lobby. The publishing >industry, in contrast, has oodles of dosh for lobbying "The Feds," and >does so, vigorously, particularly about Open Access (OA), over which the >publishing industry is desperately trying to retain control. > >In the US, this attempt to retain control takes the form of CHORUS: "Let >us handle OA for you; we will see to it that (our) articles are made OA at >the end of (our!) OA embargoes; we will host or deposit our versions of >our articles for you." > >That is how the publishing lobby is trying to retain control over the >timing, terms and territory of the US Public Access program. > >DW: To claim otherwise is nonsense. > > >(I imagine that when you are lobbying or consulting for the Feds you >express yourself more courteously, David.) > >DW: The publishers have no control whatsoever. Which federal agencies, if >any, will use CHORUS is completely up to those agencies. > > > The publishers have no control over what policy "the Feds" ultimately > adopt, fortunately. They are merely trying to lobby to get them to cede > the control to them, by adopting CHORUS. > >And you, David, as a consultant for OSTI, are attempting to incline them >toward adopting CHORUS. In this, I think you are as profoundly mistaken as >you have been in your prior >advocacy against measures to combat global warming. > >DW: If it is not going your way that is the choice of the Feds, not the >publishers. > > >I am not a professional consultant or lobbyist. I am a researcher, and "my >way" is what I think is best for research, researchers, their >institutions, their funders, and the general public whose taxes pay for >the research and for whose benefit the research is conducted. > >And mandatory Green Open Access Self-Archiving is not "my way" but the way >of 271 institutions and 90 Funders. It is one >of those funders (OSTI) that you are endeavouring to steer toward CHORUS. >I and others are trying to alert all OA policy-makers to the fact that >CHORUS is a Trojan Horse and very much against the interests of the scale >and speed of growth of Open Access. > >Stevan Harnad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ismaelrafols at GMAIL.COM Mon Jul 14 13:04:15 2014 From: ismaelrafols at GMAIL.COM (Ismael Rafols) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:04:15 +0200 Subject: two PhD positions at INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Message-ID: The institute *INGENIO* (CSIC-UPV, Val?ncia, www.ingenio.upv.es/en) has* two new doctoral positions* available for commencement in *e**arly 2015*. The positions will be (loosely) associated with research projects (2015-2018) on governance and evaluation of science, technology and innovation. 1) A PhD related to *knowledge exchange processes* between academia and socio-economic actors. Potential supervisors are Pablo *d'Este*, Ismael *Rafols* and Richard *Woolley*. Spanish is not a requirement. 2) A PhD related to the notion of *excellence and prestige* in Spanish universities. Potential supervisors are Carolina *Ca?ibano*, Jordi *Molas* *-Gallart* and Inmaculada *Vilardell* Riera (Univ. Aut?noma de Barcelona). Val?ncia is a lively mid-size, bike friendly city with pleasant climate and very affordable living costs. Positions may include research stays with INGENIO's partners in the EU-SPRI network (http://www.euspri-forum.eu). Potentially interested candidates do not hesitate to informally contact Irene Dede (idede at ingenio.upv.es). Full details at: http://www.ingenio.upv.es/en/news/phd-scholarships-ingenio-csic-upv ______________________________________________________________ Ismael Rafols Ingenio (CSIC-UPV) SPRU, Univ. Sussex (Visiting Fellow) www.ingenio.upv.es/en/Ismael-Rafolswww.sussex.ac.uk/spru/irafolswww.interdisciplinaryscience.net ______________________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Mon Jul 14 14:31:01 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:31:01 -0400 Subject: CHORUS is a Trojan Horse In-Reply-To: <0064f2879e594294a830c7123f4f7da3@APLEX09.dom1.jhuapl.edu> Message-ID: Regarding influence, in my view OSTP should have created a public Federal Advisory Committee for the US Public Access program instead of proceeding in secret for 16 months and counting. The FAC would have members, and provide much needed expertise, from all sides. That is the standard federal procedure in cases like this. I attribute it to the agency library types having very little rule making experience. See my http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/10/21/us-federal-open-access-rulemakings-to-come/. Christina, I am curious what you have against the Scholarly Kitchen? They do a pretty good job of airing competing viewpoints. David http://insidepublicaccess.com/ http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ At 09:59 AM 7/14/2014, you wrote: >1) Thank you for moving this to the listserv as I refuse to give >click traffic to the other site >2) Perhaps lobbying is not the correct term, but organizations with >money have many ways to work to influence executive branch agencies. The >explicit way is to comment on proposed rules (I think this is the >preferred place, now: >http://www.regulations.gov/#!home), but >there are many ways prior to that. >3) Federal agencies do indeed know a lot about publishing. At least >EPA, DTIC, Education, FDA, DOJ, DOT, and others that I have had contact >with do. I have heard some pushback in DoD about the burden enforcing >compliance will be for funders. But as a veteran, I can tell you that if >military folks (including DoD civilians and contractors) are not >complaining about something, then they???re probably ignoring it! It could >be that the correct, knowledgeable people in various parts of massive >departments are not the most vocal. > >Christina > >Any statements here are my own and do not reflect anything from my >employer. Actually they???re mostly based on my experience as active duty >Navy and as an EPA contractor. > >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu] On Behalf Of David Wojick >Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 10:09 AM >To: SIGMETRICS at listserv.utk.edu >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] CHORUS is a Trojan Horse > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >Sorry that is does not DOE's. My IPad keeps changing it. > >Ironically my biggest complaint is that the Feds have not consulted with >the publishers in designing the PA system. The Feds know little about >scholarly publishing, except NIH of course. > >David > >Sent from my IPad > >On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:26 AM, David Wojick ><dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US> wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >One DOE's not lobby Executive agencies. >The embargo periods will be set by the Feds. >It is better to send users to the publisher's website than to a federal >repository of accepted manuscripts, also cheaper. > >David > >Sent from my IPad > >On Jul 12, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Stevan Harnad ><amsciforum at GMAIL.COM> wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, David Wojick ><dwojick at craigellachie.us> wrote: > >DW: The timing, terms and territory of the U.S. Public Access program are >all controlled by the Feds. > > >"The Feds," as we all know, are government decision-makers whose decisions >are influenced by lobbying. The research community, though it is huge, >cannot afford -- and hence does not have -- a lobby. The publishing >industry, in contrast, has oodles of dosh for lobbying "The Feds," and >does so, vigorously, particularly about Open Access (OA), over which the >publishing industry is desperately trying to retain control. > >In the US, this attempt to retain control takes the form of CHORUS: "Let >us handle OA for you; we will see to it that (our) articles are made OA at >the end of (our!) OA embargoes; we will host or deposit our versions of >our articles for you." > >That is how the publishing lobby is trying to retain control over the >timing, terms and territory of the US Public Access program. > >DW: To claim otherwise is nonsense. > > >(I imagine that when you are lobbying or consulting for the Feds you >express yourself more courteously, David.) > >DW: The publishers have no control whatsoever. Which federal agencies, if >any, will use CHORUS is completely up to those agencies. > > > The publishers have no control over what policy "the Feds" ultimately > adopt, fortunately. They are merely trying to lobby to get them to cede > the control to them, by adopting CHORUS. > >And you, David, as a consultant for OSTI, are attempting to incline them >toward adopting CHORUS. In this, I think you are as profoundly mistaken as >you have been in your prior >advocacy against measures to combat global warming. > >DW: If it is not going your way that is the choice of the Feds, not the >publishers. > > >I am not a professional consultant or lobbyist. I am a researcher, and "my >way" is what I think is best for research, researchers, their >institutions, their funders, and the general public whose taxes pay for >the research and for whose benefit the research is conducted. > >And mandatory Green Open Access Self-Archiving is not "my way" but the way >of 271 institutions and 90 Funders. It is one >of those funders (OSTI) that you are endeavouring to steer toward CHORUS. >I and others are trying to alert all OA policy-makers to the fact that >CHORUS is a Trojan Horse and very much against the interests of the scale >and speed of growth of Open Access. > >Stevan Harnad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Tue Jul 15 09:14:33 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:33 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals Message-ID: So much for peer review. Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA WALL STREET JOURNAL OPINION PIECE The Corruption of Peer Review Is Harming Scientific Credibility Dubious studies on the danger of hurricane names may be laughable. But bad science can cause bad policy. By Hank Campbell July 13, 2014 6:32 p.m. ET Academic publishing was rocked by the news on July 8 that a company called Sage Publications is retracting 60 papers from its Journal of Vibration and Control, about the science of acoustics. The company said a researcher in Taiwan and others had exploited peer review so that certain papers were sure to get a positive review for placement in the journal. In one case, a paper's author gave glowing reviews to his own work using phony names. Acoustics is an important field. But in biomedicine faulty research and a dubious peer-review process can have life-or-death consequences. In June, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and responsible for $30 billion in annual government-funded research, held a meeting to discuss ways to ensure that more published scientific studies and results are accurate. According to a 2011 report in the monthly journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, the results of two-thirds of 67 key studies analyzed by Bayer researchers from 2008-2010 couldn't be reproduced. Enlarge Image Close [http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-DR115_edp071_D_20140713123916.jpg][cat] Getty Images That finding was a bombshell. Replication is a fundamental tenet of science, and the hallmark of peer review is that other researchers can look at data and methodology and determine the work's validity. Dr. Collins and co-author Dr. Lawrence Tabak highlighted the problem in a January 2014 article in Nature. "What hope is there that other scientists will be able to build on such work to further biomedical progress," if no one can check and replicate the research, they wrote. The authors pointed to several reasons for flawed studies, including "poor training of researchers in experimental design," an "emphasis on making provocative statements," and publications that don't "report basic elements of experimental design." They also said that "some scientists reputedly use a 'secret sauce' to make their experiments work-and withhold details from publication or describe them only vaguely to retain a competitive edge." Papers with such problems or omissions would never see the light of day if sound peer-review practices were in place-and their absence at many journals is the root of the problem. Peer review involves an anonymous panel of objective experts critiquing a paper on its merits. Obviously, a panel should not contain anyone who agrees in advance to give the paper favorable attention and help it get published. Yet a variety of journals have allowed or overlooked such practices. Absent rigorous peer review, we get the paper published in June in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Titled "Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes," it concluded that hurricanes with female names cause more deaths than male-named hurricanes-ostensibly because implicit sexism makes people take the storms with a woman's name less seriously. The work was debunked once its methods were examined, but not before it got attention nationwide. Such a dubious paper made its way into national media outlets because of the imprimatur of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences. Yet a look at the organization's own submission guidelines makes clear that if you are a National Academy member today, you can edit a research paper that you wrote yourself and only have to answer a few questions before an editorial board; you can even arrange to be the official reviewer for people you know. The result of such laxity isn't just the publication of a dubious finding like the hurricane gender-bias claim. Some errors can have serious consequences if bad science leads to bad policy. In 2002 and 2010, papers published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences claimed that a pesticide called atrazine was causing sex changes in frogs. As a result the Environmental Protection Agency set up special panels to re-examine the product's safety. Both papers had the same editor, David Wake of the University of California, Berkeley, who is a colleague of the papers' lead author, Tyrone Hayes, also of Berkeley. In keeping with National Academy of Sciences policy, Prof. Hayes preselected Prof. Wake as his editor. Both studies were published without a review of the data used to reach the finding. No one has been able to reproduce the results of either paper, including the EPA, which did expensive, time-consuming reviews of the pesticide brought about by the published claims. As the agency investigated, it couldn't even use those papers about atrazine's alleged effects because the research they were based on didn't meet the criteria for legitimate scientific work. The authors refused to hand over data that led them to their claimed results-which meant no one could run the same computer program and match their results. Earlier this month, Nature retracted two studies it had published in January in which researchers from the Riken Center for Development Biology in Japan asserted that they had found a way to turn some cells into embryonic stem cells by a simple stress process. The studies had passed peer review, the magazine said, despite flaws that included misrepresented information. Fixing peer review won't be easy, although exposing its weaknesses is a good place to start. Michael Eisen, a biologist at UC Berkeley, is a co-founder of the Public Library of Science, one of the world's largest nonprofit science publishers. He told me in an email that, "We need to get away from the notion, proven wrong on a daily basis, that peer review of any kind at any journal means that a work of science is correct. What it means is that a few (1-4) people read it over and didn't see any major problems. That's a very low bar in even the best of circumstances." But even the most rigorous peer review can be effective only if authors provide the data they used to reach their results, something that many still won't do and that few journals require for publication. Some publishers have begun to mandate open data. In March the Public Library of Science began requiring that study data be publicly available. That means anyone with the ability to check should be able to reproduce, validate and understand the findings in a published paper. This should also ensure that there is much better scrutiny of flawed claims about sexist weather events and hermaphroditic frogs-before they appear on every news station in America. Mr. Campbell is the founder of Science 2.0 and co-author of "Science Left Behind" (PublicAffairs, 2012). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 22479 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 76790 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Tue Jul 15 14:03:05 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:03:05 -0400 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <3a4c751f3ab445a0aa25629e7c70231b@CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.pro d.outlook.com> Message-ID: There is a lot of junk in this article. Here is the second paragraph: ?Acoustics is an important field. But in biomedicine faulty research and a dubious peer-review process can have life-or-death consequences. In June, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and responsible for $30 billion in annual government-funded research, held a meeting to discuss ways to ensure that more published scientific studies and results are accurate. According to a 2011 report in the monthly journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, the results of two-thirds of 67 key studies analyzed by Bayer researchers from 2008-2010 couldn't be reproduced.? Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication. My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but it only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. Interestingly, there is a metric angle to the JVC scandal. I think that with proper research an algorithm could be developed that will detect this sort of fraud. It would operate on the article submission tracking systems that all large publishers use. I discuss this in the comments to Kent Anderson's article here: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/07/14/trust-but-verify-identity-fraud-and-exploitation-of-the-trust-economy-in-scholarly-publishing/ David Wojick http://insidepublicaccess.com/issues.html At 09:14 AM 7/15/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >So much for peer review. > >Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. >LSU Libraries >Lousiana State University >Baton Rouge, LA 70803 >USA > > >WALL STREET JOURNAL OPINION PIECE > >The Corruption of Peer Review Is Harming Scientific Credibility >Dubious studies on the danger of hurricane names may be laughable. But bad >science can cause bad policy. >By >Hank Campbell >July 13, 2014 6:32 p.m. ET >Academic publishing was rocked by the news on July 8 that a company called >Sage Publications is retracting 60 papers from its Journal of Vibration >and Control, about the science of acoustics. The company said a researcher >in Taiwan and others had exploited peer review so that certain papers were >sure to get a positive review for placement in the journal. In one case, a >paper's author gave glowing reviews to his own work using phony names. >Acoustics is an important field. But in biomedicine faulty research and a >dubious peer-review process can have life-or-death consequences. In June, >Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and >responsible for $30 billion in annual government-funded research, held a >meeting to discuss ways to ensure that more published scientific studies >and results are accurate. According to a 2011 report in the monthly >journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, the results of two-thirds of 67 key >studies analyzed by Bayer researchers from 2008-2010 couldn't be reproduced. >Enlarge Image Close >http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-DR115_edp071_D_201 >cat > >Getty Images >That finding was a bombshell. Replication is a fundamental tenet of >science, and the hallmark of peer review is that other researchers can >look at data and methodology and determine the work's validity. Dr. >Collins and co-author Dr. Lawrence Tabak highlighted the problem in a >January 2014 article in Nature. "What hope is there that other scientists >will be able to build on such work to further biomedical progress," if no >one can check and replicate the research, they wrote. >The authors pointed to several reasons for flawed studies, including "poor >training of researchers in experimental design," an "emphasis on making >provocative statements," and publications that don't "report basic >elements of experimental design." They also said that "some scientists >reputedly use a 'secret sauce' to make their experiments work?and withhold >details from publication or describe them only vaguely to retain a >competitive edge." >Papers with such problems or omissions would never see the light of day if >sound peer-review practices were in place?and their absence at many >journals is the root of the problem. Peer review involves an anonymous >panel of objective experts critiquing a paper on its merits. Obviously, a >panel should not contain anyone who agrees in advance to give the paper >favorable attention and help it get published. Yet a variety of journals >have allowed or overlooked such practices. >Absent rigorous peer review, we get the paper published in June in the >Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Titled "Female hurricanes >are deadlier than male hurricanes," it concluded that hurricanes with >female names cause more deaths than male-named hurricanes?ostensibly >because implicit sexism makes people take the storms with a woman's name >less seriously. The work was debunked once its methods were examined, but >not before it got attention nationwide. >Such a dubious paper made its way into national media outlets because of >the imprimatur of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences. >Yet a look at the organization's own submission guidelines makes clear >that if you are a National Academy member today, you can edit a research >paper that you wrote yourself and only have to answer a few questions >before an editorial board; you can even arrange to be the official >reviewer for people you know. The result of such laxity isn't just the >publication of a dubious finding like the hurricane gender-bias claim. >Some errors can have serious consequences if bad science leads to bad policy. >In 2002 and 2010, papers published in the Proceedings of the National >Academy of Sciences claimed that a pesticide called atrazine was causing >sex changes in frogs. As a result the Environmental Protection Agency set >up special panels to re-examine the product's safety. Both papers had the >same editor, David Wake of the University of California, Berkeley, who is >a colleague of the papers' lead author, Tyrone Hayes, also of Berkeley. >In keeping with National Academy of Sciences policy, Prof. Hayes >preselected Prof. Wake as his editor. Both studies were published without >a review of the data used to reach the finding. No one has been able to >reproduce the results of either paper, including the EPA, which did >expensive, time-consuming reviews of the pesticide brought about by the >published claims. As the agency investigated, it couldn't even use those >papers about atrazine's alleged effects because the research they were >based on didn't meet the criteria for legitimate scientific work. The >authors refused to hand over data that led them to their claimed >results?which meant no one could run the same computer program and match >their results. >Earlier this month, Nature retracted two studies it had published in >January in which researchers from the Riken Center for Development Biology >in Japan asserted that they had found a way to turn some cells into >embryonic stem cells by a simple stress process. The studies had passed >peer review, the magazine said, despite flaws that included misrepresented >information. >Fixing peer review won't be easy, although exposing its weaknesses is a >good place to start. Michael Eisen, a biologist at UC Berkeley, is a >co-founder of the Public Library of Science, one of the world's largest >nonprofit science publishers. He told me in an email that, "We need to get >away from the notion, proven wrong on a daily basis, that peer review of >any kind at any journal means that a work of science is correct. What it >means is that a few (1-4) people read it over and didn't see any major >problems. That's a very low bar in even the best of circumstances." >But even the most rigorous peer review can be effective only if authors >provide the data they used to reach their results, something that many >still won't do and that few journals require for publication. Some >publishers have begun to mandate open data. In March the Public Library of >Science began requiring that study data be publicly available. That means >anyone with the ability to check should be able to reproduce, validate and >understand the findings in a published paper. This should also ensure that >there is much better scrutiny of flawed claims about sexist weather events >and hermaphroditic frogs?before they appear on every news station in America. >Mr. Campbell is the founder of Science 2.0 and co-author of "Science Left >Behind" (PublicAffairs, 2012). >Content-Type: image/jpeg; > name="image001.jpg" >Content-Description: image001.jpg >Content-Disposition: inline; > size=22479; > creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:32 GMT; > modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:32 GMT; > filename="image001.jpg" >Content-ID: > >Content-Type: image/jpeg; > name="image002.jpg" >Content-Description: image002.jpg >Content-Disposition: inline; > size=76790; > creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:33 GMT; > modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:33 GMT; > filename="image002.jpg" >Content-ID: > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 13cdf8b.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 22479 bytes Desc: 13cdf8b.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 13cdf9b.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 76790 bytes Desc: 13cdf9b.jpg URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Tue Jul 15 14:30:35 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:30:35 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140715135520.043e4430@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: Needless to say, it has provoked a lot of commentary-353 comments in one day. Three of them are below. It is an op-ed piece in a newspaper with a certain agenda, so do not expect too much. Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 1. This entire discussion, including the articles in the NY Times, Physics Today, and the Economist are based on a faulty, one might even say fallacious understanding of science. First, no science deals with truth. No science can deal with truth. No scientist can ever know if what is "published" under the rubric of science has any relation to any truth. Science deals with what seems to be revealed after repeated and partial observations of the world. It's not methods or objectivity (by the way there is no such) that distinguishes sciences and scientists. It's the desire and willingness to repeatedly observe the world from as many different standpoints as one can conceive that distinguishes scientific work. That's it. Peer review fits into science so conceived only in the sense that other scientists are willing to continue observing, bringing in new standpoints, collecting new information. Second, the critiques of experimentation and the review of laboratory results presented in these papers is at best misplaced. At worst wrongheaded. What happens in laboratories, statistical testing, experiments has to be connected to things that don't happen in the laboratories, testing, etc. by creating a set of explanations, of stories if you will that encompass both. Pasteur created in his laboratory ways to show the anthrax animal and its operations. But his real genius was through the press, winning over other scientists, farmers, veterinarians, and convincing the local and national governments that the procedures he developed to kill this animal in the laboratory would also kill it on the actual farms and with actual farm animals; and that killing this animal would result in a reduction or elimination of the "awful disease" that was destroying European farms. His assertion was sometimes wrong. But he was correct often enough that his process for killing the anthrax animal eventually was supported by the scientific community, by veterinarians, by public officials, and by farmers. And over the ensuing years other approaches were developed based on continuing observations of this animal and others as well. This process is ongoing today, more than 100 years after Pasteur's death. 2. Peer Review has been reduced to a review by fellow liars with a political agenda when it comes to "climate science" They all do it for the billions they get to "research" things that they will not publish with the appropriate supporting data. But don't expect this kind of reporting to make it to the Obama media harem couches at the NYTimes, WaPo, etc. 3. The cover story of the Economist in Oct. of last year was about this very problem. Here is a disturbing excerpt: "A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated. Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "landmark" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist frets that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are bunk. In 2000-10 roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later retracted because of mistakes or improprieties." A link to the whole article: http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-research-has-changed-world-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:03 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals There is a lot of junk in this article. Here is the second paragraph: "Acoustics is an important field. But in biomedicine faulty research and a dubious peer-review process can have life-or-death consequences. In June, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and responsible for $30 billion in annual government-funded research, held a meeting to discuss ways to ensure that more published scientific studies and results are accurate. According to a 2011 report in the monthly journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, the results of two-thirds of 67 key studies analyzed by Bayer researchers from 2008-2010 couldn't be reproduced." Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication. My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but it only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. Interestingly, there is a metric angle to the JVC scandal. I think that with proper research an algorithm could be developed that will detect this sort of fraud. It would operate on the article submission tracking systems that all large publishers use. I discuss this in the comments to Kent Anderson's article here: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/07/14/trust-but-verify-identity-fraud-and-exploitation-of-the-trust-economy-in-scholarly-publishing/ David Wojick http://insidepublicaccess.com/issues.html At 09:14 AM 7/15/2014, you wrote: So much for peer review. Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA WALL STREET JOURNAL OPINION PIECE The Corruption of Peer Review Is Harming Scientific Credibility Dubious studies on the danger of hurricane names may be laughable. But bad science can cause bad policy. By Hank Campbell July 13, 2014 6:32 p.m. ET Academic publishing was rocked by the news on July 8 that a company called Sage Publications is retracting 60 papers from its Journal of Vibration and Control, about the science of acoustics. The company said a researcher in Taiwan and others had exploited peer review so that certain papers were sure to get a positive review for placement in the journal. In one case, a paper's author gave glowing reviews to his own work using phony names. Acoustics is an important field. But in biomedicine faulty research and a dubious peer-review process can have life-or-death consequences. In June, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and responsible for $30 billion in annual government-funded research, held a meeting to discuss ways to ensure that more published scientific studies and results are accurate. According to a 2011 report in the monthly journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, the results of two-thirds of 67 key studies analyzed by Bayer researchers from 2008-2010 couldn't be reproduced. Enlarge Image Close [http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-DR115_edp071_D_201][cat] Getty Images That finding was a bombshell. Replication is a fundamental tenet of science, and the hallmark of peer review is that other researchers can look at data and methodology and determine the work's validity. Dr. Collins and co-author Dr. Lawrence Tabak highlighted the problem in a January 2014 article in Nature. "What hope is there that other scientists will be able to build on such work to further biomedical progress," if no one can check and replicate the research, they wrote. The authors pointed to several reasons for flawed studies, including "poor training of researchers in experimental design," an "emphasis on making provocative statements," and publications that don't "report basic elements of experimental design." They also said that "some scientists reputedly use a 'secret sauce' to make their experiments workand withhold details from publication or describe them only vaguely to retain a competitive edge." Papers with such problems or omissions would never see the light of day if sound peer-review practices were in placeand their absence at many journals is the root of the problem. Peer review involves an anonymous panel of objective experts critiquing a paper on its merits. Obviously, a panel should not contain anyone who agrees in advance to give the paper favorable attention and help it get published. Yet a variety of journals have allowed or overlooked such practices. Absent rigorous peer review, we get the paper published in June in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Titled "Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes," it concluded that hurricanes with female names cause more deaths than male-named hurricanesostensibly because implicit sexism makes people take the storms with a woman's name less seriously. The work was debunked once its methods were examined, but not before it got attention nationwide. Such a dubious paper made its way into national media outlets because of the imprimatur of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences. Yet a look at the organization's own submission guidelines makes clear that if you are a National Academy member today, you can edit a research paper that you wrote yourself and only have to answer a few questions before an editorial board; you can even arrange to be the official reviewer for people you know. The result of such laxity isn't just the publication of a dubious finding like the hurricane gender-bias claim. Some errors can have serious consequences if bad science leads to bad policy. In 2002 and 2010, papers published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences claimed that a pesticide called atrazine was causing sex changes in frogs. As a result the Environmental Protection Agency set up special panels to re-examine the product's safety. Both papers had the same editor, David Wake of the University of California, Berkeley, who is a colleague of the papers' lead author, Tyrone Hayes, also of Berkeley. In keeping with National Academy of Sciences policy, Prof. Hayes preselected Prof. Wake as his editor. Both studies were published without a review of the data used to reach the finding. No one has been able to reproduce the results of either paper, including the EPA, which did expensive, time-consuming reviews of the pesticide brought about by the published claims. As the agency investigated, it couldn't even use those papers about atrazine's alleged effects because the research they were based on didn't meet the criteria for legitimate scientific work. The authors refused to hand over data that led them to their claimed resultswhich meant no one could run the same computer program and match their results. Earlier this month, Nature retracted two studies it had published in January in which researchers from the Riken Center for Development Biology in Japan asserted that they had found a way to turn some cells into embryonic stem cells by a simple stress process. The studies had passed peer review, the magazine said, despite flaws that included misrepresented information. Fixing peer review won't be easy, although exposing its weaknesses is a good place to start. Michael Eisen, a biologist at UC Berkeley, is a co-founder of the Public Library of Science, one of the world's largest nonprofit science publishers. He told me in an email that, "We need to get away from the notion, proven wrong on a daily basis, that peer review of any kind at any journal means that a work of science is correct. What it means is that a few (1-4) people read it over and didn't see any major problems. That's a very low bar in even the best of circumstances." But even the most rigorous peer review can be effective only if authors provide the data they used to reach their results, something that many still won't do and that few journals require for publication. Some publishers have begun to mandate open data. In March the Public Library of Science began requiring that study data be publicly available. That means anyone with the ability to check should be able to reproduce, validate and understand the findings in a published paper. This should also ensure that there is much better scrutiny of flawed claims about sexist weather events and hermaphroditic frogsbefore they appear on every news station in America. Mr. Campbell is the founder of Science 2.0 and co-author of "Science Left Behind" (PublicAffairs, 2012). Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="image001.jpg" Content-Description: image001.jpg Content-Disposition: inline; size=22479; creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:32 GMT; modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:32 GMT; filename="image001.jpg" Content-ID: > Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="image002.jpg" Content-Description: image002.jpg Content-Disposition: inline; size=76790; creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:33 GMT; modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:33 GMT; filename="image002.jpg" Content-ID: > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 22479 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 76790 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Tue Jul 15 14:59:52 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:59:52 -0400 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: People do have a lot of strange ideas about science and Web 2.0 gives them a chance to indulge these ideas. The good news is that there is a lot of public engagement with science as a result, not all of it strange. David At 02:30 PM 7/15/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >Needless to say, it has provoked a lot of commentary?353 comments in one >day. Three of them are below. It is an op-ed piece in a newspaper with a >certain agenda, so do not expect too much. > > >Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. >LSU Libraries >Lousiana State University >Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > >1. This entire discussion, including the articles in the NY Times, >Physics Today, and the Economist are based on a faulty, one might even say >fallacious understanding of science. First, no science deals with >truth. No science can deal with truth. No scientist can ever know if >what is ?published? under the rubric of science has any relation to any >truth. Science deals with what seems to be revealed after repeated and >partial observations of the world. It?s not methods or objectivity (by >the way there is no such) that distinguishes sciences and >scientists. It?s the desire and willingness to repeatedly observe the >world from as many different standpoints as one can conceive that >distinguishes scientific work. That?s it. Peer review fits into science >so conceived only in the sense that other scientists are willing to >continue observing, bringing in new standpoints, collecting new >information. Second, the critiques of experimentation and the review of >laboratory results presented in these papers is at best misplaced. At >worst wrongheaded. What happens in laboratories, statistical testing, >experiments has to be connected to things that don?t happen in the >laboratories, testing, etc. by creating a set of explanations, of stories >if you will that encompass both. Pasteur created in his laboratory ways >to show the anthrax animal and its operations. But his real genius was >through the press, winning over other scientists, farmers, veterinarians, >and convincing the local and national governments that the procedures he >developed to kill this animal in the laboratory would also kill it on the >actual farms and with actual farm animals; and that killing this animal >would result in a reduction or elimination of the ?awful disease? that was >destroying European farms. His assertion was sometimes wrong. But he was >correct often enough that his process for killing the anthrax animal >eventually was supported by the scientific community, by veterinarians, by >public officials, and by farmers. And over the ensuing years other >approaches were developed based on continuing observations of this animal >and others as well. This process is ongoing today, more than 100 years >after Pasteur?s death. > >2. Peer Review has been reduced to a review by fellow liars with a >political agenda when it comes to "climate science" They all do it for the >billions they get to "research" things that they will not publish with the >appropriate supporting data. But don't expect this kind of reporting to >make it to the Obama media harem couches at the NYTimes, WaPo, etc. > > >3. The cover story of the Economist in Oct. of last year was about >this very problem. Here is a disturbing excerpt: > >"A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of >published research cannot be replicated. Even that may be optimistic. Last >year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce >just six of 53 ?landmark? studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at >Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly >important papers. A leading computer scientist frets that three-quarters >of papers in his subfield are bunk. In 2000-10 roughly 80,000 patients >took part in clinical trials based on research that was later retracted >because of mistakes or improprieties." > >A link to the whole article: > >http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-research-has-changed-world-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong > > > >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick >Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:03 PM >To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > >There is a lot of junk in this article. > >Here is the second paragraph: ?Acoustics is an important field. But in >biomedicine faulty research and a dubious peer-review process can have >life-or-death consequences. In June, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the >National Institutes of Health and responsible for $30 billion in annual >government-funded research, held a meeting to discuss ways to ensure that >more published scientific studies and results are accurate. According to a >2011 report in the monthly journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, the >results of two-thirds of 67 key studies analyzed by Bayer researchers from >2008-2010 couldn't be reproduced.? > >Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication. > >My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but it >only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims >of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social >movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. > >Interestingly, there is a metric angle to the JVC scandal. I think that >with proper research an algorithm could be developed that will detect this >sort of fraud. It would operate on the article submission tracking systems >that all large publishers use. I discuss this in the comments to Kent >Anderson's article here: >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/07/14/trust-but-verify-identity-fraud-and-exploitation-of-the-trust-economy-in-scholarly-publishing/ > > >David Wojick >http://insidepublicaccess.com/issues.html > > >At 09:14 AM 7/15/2014, you wrote: > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >So much for peer review. > >Stephen J Bensman, Ph.D. >LSU Libraries >Lousiana State University >Baton Rouge, LA 70803 >USA > > >WALL STREET JOURNAL OPINION PIECE > >The Corruption of Peer Review Is Harming Scientific Credibility >Dubious studies on the danger of hurricane names may be laughable. But bad >science can cause bad policy. >By >Hank Campbell >July 13, 2014 6:32 p.m. ET >Academic publishing was rocked by the news on July 8 that a company called >Sage Publications is retracting 60 papers from its Journal of Vibration >and Control, about the science of acoustics. The company said a researcher >in Taiwan and others had exploited peer review so that certain papers were >sure to get a positive review for placement in the journal. In one case, a >paper's author gave glowing reviews to his own work using phony names. >Acoustics is an important field. But in biomedicine faulty research and a >dubious peer-review process can have life-or-death consequences. In June, >Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and >responsible for $30 billion in annual government-funded research, held a >meeting to discuss ways to ensure that more published scientific studies >and results are accurate. According to a 2011 report in the monthly >journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, the results of two-thirds of 67 key >studies analyzed by Bayer researchers from 2008-2010 couldn't be reproduced. >Enlarge Image Close >http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-DR115_edp071_D_201 >cat > >Getty Images >That finding was a bombshell. Replication is a fundamental tenet of >science, and the hallmark of peer review is that other researchers can >look at data and methodology and determine the work's validity. Dr. >Collins and co-author Dr. Lawrence Tabak highlighted the problem in a >January 2014 article in Nature. "What hope is there that other scientists >will be able to build on such work to further biomedical progress," if no >one can check and replicate the research, they wrote. >The authors pointed to several reasons for flawed studies, including "poor >training of researchers in experimental design," an "emphasis on making >provocative statements," and publications that don't "report basic >elements of experimental design." They also said that "some scientists >reputedly use a 'secret sauce' to make their experiments work?and withhold >details from publication or describe them only vaguely to retain a >competitive edge." >Papers with such problems or omissions would never see the light of day if >sound peer-review practices were in place?and their absence at many >journals is the root of the problem. Peer review involves an anonymous >panel of objective experts critiquing a paper on its merits. Obviously, a >panel should not contain anyone who agrees in advance to give the paper >favorable attention and help it get published. Yet a variety of journals >have allowed or overlooked such practices. >Absent rigorous peer review, we get the paper published in June in the >Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Titled "Female hurricanes >are deadlier than male hurricanes," it concluded that hurricanes with >female names cause more deaths than male-named hurricanes?ostensibly >because implicit sexism makes people take the storms with a woman's name >less seriously. The work was debunked once its methods were examined, but >not before it got attention nationwide. >Such a dubious paper made its way into national media outlets because of >the imprimatur of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences. >Yet a look at the organization's own submission guidelines makes clear >that if you are a National Academy member today, you can edit a research >paper that you wrote yourself and only have to answer a few questions >before an editorial board; you can even arrange to be the official >reviewer for people you know. The result of such laxity isn't just the >publication of a dubious finding like the hurricane gender-bias claim. >Some errors can have serious consequences if bad science leads to bad policy. >In 2002 and 2010, papers published in the Proceedings of the National >Academy of Sciences claimed that a pesticide called atrazine was causing >sex changes in frogs. As a result the Environmental Protection Agency set >up special panels to re-examine the product's safety. Both papers had the >same editor, David Wake of the University of California, Berkeley, who is >a colleague of the papers' lead author, Tyrone Hayes, also of Berkeley. >In keeping with National Academy of Sciences policy, Prof. Hayes >preselected Prof. Wake as his editor. Both studies were published without >a review of the data used to reach the finding. No one has been able to >reproduce the results of either paper, including the EPA, which did >expensive, time-consuming reviews of the pesticide brought about by the >published claims. As the agency investigated, it couldn't even use those >papers about atrazine's alleged effects because the research they were >based on didn't meet the criteria for legitimate scientific work. The >authors refused to hand over data that led them to their claimed >results?which meant no one could run the same computer program and match >their results. >Earlier this month, Nature retracted two studies it had published in >January in which researchers from the Riken Center for Development Biology >in Japan asserted that they had found a way to turn some cells into >embryonic stem cells by a simple stress process. The studies had passed >peer review, the magazine said, despite flaws that included misrepresented >information. >Fixing peer review won't be easy, although exposing its weaknesses is a >good place to start. Michael Eisen, a biologist at UC Berkeley, is a >co-founder of the Public Library of Science, one of the world's largest >nonprofit science publishers. He told me in an email that, "We need to get >away from the notion, proven wrong on a daily basis, that peer review of >any kind at any journal means that a work of science is correct. What it >means is that a few (1-4) people read it over and didn't see any major >problems. That's a very low bar in even the best of circumstances." >But even the most rigorous peer review can be effective only if authors >provide the data they used to reach their results, something that many >still won't do and that few journals require for publication. Some >publishers have begun to mandate open data. In March the Public Library of >Science began requiring that study data be publicly available. That means >anyone with the ability to check should be able to reproduce, validate and >understand the findings in a published paper. This should also ensure that >there is much better scrutiny of flawed claims about sexist weather events >and hermaphroditic frogs?before they appear on every news station in America. >Mr. Campbell is the founder of Science 2.0 and co-author of "Science Left >Behind" (PublicAffairs, 2012). >Content-Type: image/jpeg; > name="image001.jpg" >Content-Description: image001.jpg >Content-Disposition: inline; > size=22479; > creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:32 GMT; > modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:32 GMT; > filename="image001.jpg" >Content-ID: ><image001.jpg at 01CFA004.CDBC0B40> > >Content-Type: image/jpeg; > name="image002.jpg" >Content-Description: image002.jpg >Content-Disposition: inline; > size=76790; > creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:33 GMT; > modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:14:33 GMT; > filename="image002.jpg" >Content-ID: ><image002.jpg at 01CFA004.CDBC0B40> > >Content-Type: image/jpeg; > name="image001.jpg" >Content-Description: image001.jpg >Content-Disposition: inline; > size=22479; > creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:30:33 GMT; > modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:30:33 GMT; > filename="image001.jpg" >Content-ID: > >Content-Type: image/jpeg; > name="image002.jpg" >Content-Description: image002.jpg >Content-Disposition: inline; > size=76790; > creation-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:30:34 GMT; > modification-date=Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:30:34 GMT; > filename="image002.jpg" >Content-ID: > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 170dde7.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 22479 bytes Desc: 170dde7.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 170ddf6.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 76790 bytes Desc: 170ddf6.jpg URL: From vincent.lariviere at UMONTREAL.CA Wed Jul 16 15:03:57 2014 From: vincent.lariviere at UMONTREAL.CA (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Larivi=E8re_Vincent?=) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:03:57 +0000 Subject: ASIS&T SIG/MET Workshop (Seattle) - Call for Abstracts Message-ID: METRICS 2014 - ASIS&T WORKSHOP ON INFORMETRIC AND SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH CALL FOR ABSTRACTS The ASIS&T Special Interest Group for Metrics (SIG/MET) will host a workshop on Wednesday, November 5th 2014 (9am - 5pm), at the end of the ASIS&T Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington. This workshop will provide an opportunity for presentations and in-depth conversations on metric-related issues, including the latest theories, approaches, applications, innovations, and tools. The workshop is envisioned as a combination of short presentations and open discussion. Research on metrics has been growing significantly over the last decades. In addition to account for a significant proportion of the literature published in core LIS journals, there is also a large proportion of metrics literature published in general science journal as well as in medical journals. Recent workshops on the topics have been largely successful. For instance, on November 2nd 2013, SIG/MET held its third annual Workshop on Informetric and Scientometric Research, during the ASIS&T Annual Meeting in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The full day event, sponsored by both Elsevier and Thomson Reuters, attracted 30 participants. The symposium consisted of two poster presentations and thirteen paper presentations by authors from nine countries (Canada, Finland, Germany, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States). As in previous years, the SIG recognized outstanding student contributions, with one session devoted to presenting these awards and presentations by the recipients. The 2014 workshop would continue in this vein and consolidate the work done in previous iterations of the workshop. We propose to include presentations from both established researchers and students, all done in an informal setting where genuine exchanges can be made. The topics covered would include the following but are not limited to: - New indicators and methods - Applications of indicators - Theories of the publication process and citations - Metrics in a library setting - Open access and metrics - Tool development - Limitations, misuses and adverse effects of metrics - Measurements and implications of interdisciplinarity - Visualizations of scholarly impact measures and analyses SIG/MET is the Special Interest Group for the measurement of information production and use. It encourages the development and networking of all those interested in the measurement of information. It encompasses not only bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics and informetrics, but also measurement of the Web and the Internet, applications running on these platforms, and metrics related to network analysis, visualization, and scholarly communication. Submissions Submissions should be in the form of a two-page structured abstract. Conceptual, empirical, and works-in-progress will be accepted for submission. Where appropriate, up to three figures/tables can be provided. Two types of submissions will be accepted: posters and presentations. Please indicate the type of submission in bold at the beginning of your submission. The requirements for both formats are the same. Submit in .pdf, .doc or .docx to : https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=sigmet2014 Peer-Review process Each submission will be reviewed and brief feedback will be given in narrative format. Important Dates Submissions due: August 31, 2014 Notifications: September 15, 2014 Workshop: November 5, 2014 Registration fees The registration fee is $200 for ASIST members and will include wifi and two break meals. First 15 students who register will receive $100 back from their registration, courtesy of Elsevier. With questions, please contact Vincent Larivi?re Chair, SIG/MET vincent.lariviere at umontreal.ca ________________________ Vincent Larivi?re, Ph.D. Chaire de recherche du Canada sur les transformations de la communication savante ?cole de biblioth?conomie et des sciences de l'information (EBSI) Universit? de Montr?al Directeur scientifique adjoint Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST) Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST) Universit? du Qu?bec ? Montr?al T?l: +1.514.343.5600 Fax: +1.514.343.5753 http://crc.ebsi.umontreal.ca vincent.lariviere at umontreal.ca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG Fri Jul 18 14:31:14 2014 From: de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG (C. Gloster) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:31:14 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140715135520.043e4430@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: David Wojick claimed: |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[. . .] | | | |Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not involve replication. |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but it| |only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims | |of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social | |movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. | | | |[. . .]" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| Lack of replication harms science. Regards, C. Gloster From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Fri Jul 18 14:55:40 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:55:40 -0400 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to say whether the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing journal. Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, weeks, months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are very different things, hence so are review and replication.. As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the replication attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same recipe and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a hole in the middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so failure to replicate is not telling. David Wojick http://insidepublicaccess.com/ http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >David Wojick claimed: >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"[. . .] | >| | >|Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." | >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not >involve replication. > >|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but it| >|only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims | >|of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social | >|movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. | >| | >|[. . .]" | >|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >Lack of replication harms science. > >Regards, >C. Gloster From notsjb at LSU.EDU Fri Jul 18 15:07:54 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 19:07:54 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140718143242.063101b8@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: Needless to say, lack of ability to replicate is one of the main reasons for financial losses in the pharmaceutical industry, sending many companies down wrong paths. The problem is so bad that it is my understanding that the NIH is requiring that data be made openly accessible if the research is the result of an NIH grant so that it can be replicated. This is one of the main reasons why universities are establishing open access institutional repositories. LSU is considering the Dataverse Network, on which ASIST just presented a Webinar. If interested, see the URL below: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataverse There is more than cakes being cooked in various kitchens. There is a lot of data also being cooked. Stephen J. Bensman LSU Libraries USA -----Original Message----- From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:56 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to say whether the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing journal. Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, weeks, months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are very different things, hence so are review and replication.. As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the replication attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same recipe and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a hole in the middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so failure to replicate is not telling. David Wojick http://insidepublicaccess.com/ http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >David Wojick claimed: >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"[. . .] | >| | >|Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." | >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not >involve replication. > >|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but it| >|only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims | >|of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social | >|movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. | >| | >|[. . .]" | >|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >Lack of replication harms science. > >Regards, >C. Gloster From dpv at COMPLEXMATTER.ORG Fri Jul 18 15:08:13 2014 From: dpv at COMPLEXMATTER.ORG (Dowman P Varn) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:08:13 -0700 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140718143242.063101b8@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: David, Your first point is spot-on, but I must take issue with the second. Repeatability of experimental work is a cornerstone of science. While some observations are inherently unrepeatable, for example the discovery of a rare fossil, others are not. For example, the cold fusion debacle of the late 80's and early 90's revolved around the inability of numerous other groups to repeat the experiment. While unrepeatability may be due to factors other than a mistake in the original research, we'd be foolish not to consider failed efforts to repeat an experiment as evidence of error in the original. Perhaps not decisive evidence, but compelling evidence nonetheless. Regards, Dowman On 18 July 2014 11:55, David Wojick wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours > because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to say > whether the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing > journal. Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, > weeks, months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are > very different things, hence so are review and replication.. > > As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the > original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may > be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not > conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the > replication attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. > This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife > recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied > chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same recipe > and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a hole in the > middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so failure to > replicate is not telling. > > David Wojick > http://insidepublicaccess.com/ > http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ > > > At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> >> David Wojick claimed: >> |----------------------------------------------------------- >> ---------------| >> |"[. . .] >> | >> | >> | >> |Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." >> | >> |----------------------------------------------------------- >> ---------------| >> >> It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not >> involve replication. >> >> |----------------------------------------------------------- >> ----------------| >> |"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but >> it| >> |only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims >> | >> |of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social >> | >> |movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. >> | >> | >> | >> |[. . .]" >> | >> |----------------------------------------------------------- >> ----------------| >> >> Lack of replication harms science. >> >> Regards, >> C. Gloster >> > -- ______________________________ Dowman P Varn, PhD Complexity Sciences Center & Department of Physics University of California, One Shields Ave Davis, CA 95616 Cell: 646.228.7256 Email: dpv at complexmatter.org Web site: wissenplatz.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Fri Jul 18 15:24:33 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:24:33 -0400 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Sorry Stephen, but I do not believe that a lot of data is being cooked. Some certainly, but that is to be expected when millions of people are involved. I read this as a false scare being promulgated by people with an agenda, namely the "open" movement. David At 03:07 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >Needless to say, lack of ability to replicate is one of the main reasons >for financial losses in the pharmaceutical industry, sending many >companies down wrong paths. The problem is so bad that it is my >understanding that the NIH is requiring that data be made openly >accessible if the research is the result of an NIH grant so that it can be >replicated. This is one of the main reasons why universities are >establishing open access institutional repositories. LSU is considering >the Dataverse Network, on which ASIST just presented a Webinar. If >interested, see the URL below: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataverse > >There is more than cakes being cooked in various kitchens. There is a lot >of data also being cooked. > >Stephen J. Bensman >LSU Libraries >USA > >-----Original Message----- >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick >Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:56 PM >To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours >because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to >say whether the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing >journal. >Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, weeks, >months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are very >different things, hence so are review and replication.. > >As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the >original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may >be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not >conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the >replication attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. >This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife >recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied >chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same recipe >and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a hole in the >middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so failure to >replicate is not telling. > >David Wojick >http://insidepublicaccess.com/ >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ > >At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > >David Wojick claimed: > >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >|"[. . .] | > >| | > >|Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." | > >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > >It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not > >involve replication. > > > >|------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---| > >|"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, > but it| > >|only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad > claims | > >|of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what > social | > >|movements feed on, and there is plenty to go > around. | > >| > | > >|[. . > .]" | > >|------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---| > > > >Lack of replication harms science. > > > >Regards, > >C. Gloster From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Fri Jul 18 15:30:10 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:30:10 -0400 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dowman, I do not consider a single failure of replication to be compelling evidence against the original research, far from it. Especially not if the procedure is complex, subtle or delicate. I was involved in the cold fusion case and there were hundreds of attempts at replication by different research groups. When they all failed the judgement became clear, but only then. My best regards, David At 03:08 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >David, > >Your first point is spot-on, but I must take issue with the second. >Repeatability of experimental work is a cornerstone of science. While some >observations are inherently unrepeatable, for example the discovery of a >rare fossil, others are not. For example, the cold fusion debacle of the >late 80's and early 90's revolved around the inability of numerous other >groups to repeat the experiment. While unrepeatability may be due to >factors other than a mistake in the original research, we'd be foolish not >to consider failed efforts to repeat an experiment as evidence of error in >the original. Perhaps not decisive evidence, but compelling evidence >nonetheless. > >Regards, > >Dowman > > >On 18 July 2014 11:55, David Wojick ><dwojick at craigellachie.us> wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours >because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to >say whether the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing >journal. Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, >weeks, months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are >very different things, hence so are review and replication.. > >As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the >original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may >be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not >conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the >replication attempt may fail simply because something was done >differently. This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. >My wife recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is >applied chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same >recipe and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a hole >in the middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so failure >to replicate is not telling. > >David Wojick >http://insidepublicaccess.com/ >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ > > >At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >David Wojick claimed: >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"[. . .] >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >| >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >|Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not >involve replication. > >|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but it| >|only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims ? | >|of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social >? ? ? | >|movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >| >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >|[. . .]" >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >Lack of replication harms science. > >Regards, >C. Gloster > > > > >-- >______________________________ >Dowman P Varn, PhD >Complexity Sciences Center & Department of Physics >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >University of California,? One Shields Ave >Davis, CA 95616 > >Cell:? 646.228.7256 ? >Email: dpv at complexmatter.org >Web site: wissenplatz.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From notsjb at LSU.EDU Fri Jul 18 15:54:09 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 19:54:09 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140718152155.06373158@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: As I have made abundantly clear, I do not think that open access is a "movement" but a technical and financial necessity. There is a need for replication, or otherwise NIH would not make data access a requirement.. What would you say to combining the two functions--an article could not be published unless its research can be replicated? In other words, with the data easily accessible, editors could send the article for replication before publishing. No publication without replication. Almost sounds like a revolutionary chant you can shout in the street while rioting. Steve B. -----Original Message----- From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 2:25 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals Sorry Stephen, but I do not believe that a lot of data is being cooked. Some certainly, but that is to be expected when millions of people are involved. I read this as a false scare being promulgated by people with an agenda, namely the "open" movement. David At 03:07 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >Needless to say, lack of ability to replicate is one of the main >reasons for financial losses in the pharmaceutical industry, sending >many companies down wrong paths. The problem is so bad that it is my >understanding that the NIH is requiring that data be made openly >accessible if the research is the result of an NIH grant so that it can >be replicated. This is one of the main reasons why universities are >establishing open access institutional repositories. LSU is >considering the Dataverse Network, on which ASIST just presented a >Webinar. If interested, see the URL below: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataverse > >There is more than cakes being cooked in various kitchens. There is a >lot of data also being cooked. > >Stephen J. Bensman >LSU Libraries >USA > >-----Original Message----- >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick >Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:56 PM >To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours >because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to >say whether the results are important enough to publish in the >reviewing journal. >Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, weeks, >months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are very >different things, hence so are review and replication.. > >As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the >original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There >may be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is >not conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result >the replication attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. >This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife >recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied >chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same >recipe and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a >hole in the middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so >failure to replicate is not telling. > >David Wojick >http://insidepublicaccess.com/ >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ > >At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > >David Wojick claimed: > >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >|"[. . .] | > >| | > >|Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." | > >|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > >It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not > >involve replication. > > > >|-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >|---- > ---| > >|"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, > but it| > >|only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad > claims | > >|of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what > social | > >|movements feed on, and there is plenty to go > around. | > >| > | > >|[. . > .]" | > >|-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >|---- > ---| > > > >Lack of replication harms science. > > > >Regards, > >C. Gloster From dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US Fri Jul 18 16:20:10 2014 From: dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US (David Wojick) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:20:10 -0400 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6daf81c7658c48a58cb9d96f8ee9f399@CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.pro d.outlook.com> Message-ID: Dear Steve, First of all, replication also requires collecting the data, not just checking how it is processed. There is a great deal more to replication than checking someone's math. Replication means repeating the research. (You may be confusing replication with an audit, but even audits are very laborious.) It would be a colossal waste of time and a great drain on science if people stopped doing research in order to do replication, as you are calling for. Repeating every piece of research prior to publication basically cuts the amount of original research done in half. Is that what you are proposing? I see neither a technical nor a financial necessity for open access. It that were true we would not need mandates, manifestos, boycotts, op-eds, etc. It is a classic social movement. NIH is a political organization as well as a research one. The Director is a political appointee. He has to do something in response to the political pressure of the movement. David At 03:54 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >As I have made abundantly clear, I do not think that open access is a >"movement" but a technical and financial necessity. There is a need for >replication, or otherwise NIH would not make data access a >requirement.. What would you say to combining the two functions--an >article could not be published unless its research can be replicated? In >other words, with the data easily accessible, editors could send the >article for replication before publishing. No publication without >replication. Almost sounds like a revolutionary chant you can shout in >the street while rioting. > >Steve B. > >-----Original Message----- >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick >Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 2:25 PM >To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >Sorry Stephen, but I do not believe that a lot of data is being cooked. >Some certainly, but that is to be expected when millions of people are >involved. I read this as a false scare being promulgated by people with an >agenda, namely the "open" movement. > >David > >At 03:07 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > >Needless to say, lack of ability to replicate is one of the main > >reasons for financial losses in the pharmaceutical industry, sending > >many companies down wrong paths. The problem is so bad that it is my > >understanding that the NIH is requiring that data be made openly > >accessible if the research is the result of an NIH grant so that it can > >be replicated. This is one of the main reasons why universities are > >establishing open access institutional repositories. LSU is > >considering the Dataverse Network, on which ASIST just presented a > >Webinar. If interested, see the URL below: > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataverse > > > >There is more than cakes being cooked in various kitchens. There is a > >lot of data also being cooked. > > > >Stephen J. Bensman > >LSU Libraries > >USA > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick > >Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:56 PM > >To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals > > > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > >This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours > >because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to > >say whether the results are important enough to publish in the > >reviewing journal. > >Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, weeks, > >months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are very > >different things, hence so are review and replication.. > > > >As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the > >original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There > >may be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is > >not conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result > >the replication attempt may fail simply because something was done > differently. > >This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife > >recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied > >chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same > >recipe and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a > >hole in the middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so > >failure to replicate is not telling. > > > >David Wojick > >http://insidepublicaccess.com/ > >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ > > > >At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > > >David Wojick claimed: > > >|---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----| > > >|"[. . > .] | > > >| > | > > >|Of course peer review has nothing to do with > replication." | > > >|---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----| > > > > > >It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not > > >involve replication. > > > > > >|-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >|---- > > ---| > > >|"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, > > but it| > > >|only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad > > claims | > > >|of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what > > social | > > >|movements feed on, and there is plenty to go > > around. | > > >| > > | > > >|[. . > > .]" | > > >|-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >|---- > > ---| > > > > > >Lack of replication harms science. > > > > > >Regards, > > >C. Gloster From notsjb at LSU.EDU Fri Jul 18 16:39:54 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:39:54 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140718160654.063141c8@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: David, I was only running the idea by you. Replication is always mentioned as a problem. It seems logical in reviewing a paper to replicate what is said is being done with the data on which it was supposedly done. True replication is collecting another set of data and trying the same thing. What I am saying seems simple enough. It is a simple check that this one worked. This too runs the risk of cooked data. Even Price supposedly cooked his data to get the results he wanted. Everything is business models. Google can give free to libraries what costs hundreds thousands of dollars from others. That is why I am studying Google so much to check its validity. LSU is so poor that we cannot afford the others, and we may just have to make do with Google. And we are relatively rich in comparison with the majority of other institutions outside the US. Computer space is cheap and infinite; journals are not. Journals will die a natural death and disappear like the dinosaurs they are. There is nothing polictial about it. SB -----Original Message----- From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 3:20 PM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals Dear Steve, First of all, replication also requires collecting the data, not just checking how it is processed. There is a great deal more to replication than checking someone's math. Replication means repeating the research. (You may be confusing replication with an audit, but even audits are very laborious.) It would be a colossal waste of time and a great drain on science if people stopped doing research in order to do replication, as you are calling for. Repeating every piece of research prior to publication basically cuts the amount of original research done in half. Is that what you are proposing? I see neither a technical nor a financial necessity for open access. It that were true we would not need mandates, manifestos, boycotts, op-eds, etc. It is a classic social movement. NIH is a political organization as well as a research one. The Director is a political appointee. He has to do something in response to the political pressure of the movement. David At 03:54 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >As I have made abundantly clear, I do not think that open access is a >"movement" but a technical and financial necessity. There is a need >for replication, or otherwise NIH would not make data access a >requirement.. What would you say to combining the two functions--an >article could not be published unless its research can be replicated? >In other words, with the data easily accessible, editors could send the >article for replication before publishing. No publication without >replication. Almost sounds like a revolutionary chant you can shout in >the street while rioting. > >Steve B. > >-----Original Message----- >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick >Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 2:25 PM >To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > >Sorry Stephen, but I do not believe that a lot of data is being cooked. >Some certainly, but that is to be expected when millions of people are >involved. I read this as a false scare being promulgated by people with >an agenda, namely the "open" movement. > >David > >At 03:07 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > >Needless to say, lack of ability to replicate is one of the main > >reasons for financial losses in the pharmaceutical industry, sending > >many companies down wrong paths. The problem is so bad that it is my > >understanding that the NIH is requiring that data be made openly > >accessible if the research is the result of an NIH grant so that it > >can be replicated. This is one of the main reasons why universities > >are establishing open access institutional repositories. LSU is > >considering the Dataverse Network, on which ASIST just presented a > >Webinar. If interested, see the URL below: > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataverse > > > >There is more than cakes being cooked in various kitchens. There is > >a lot of data also being cooked. > > > >Stephen J. Bensman > >LSU Libraries > >USA > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics > >[mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of David Wojick > >Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:56 PM > >To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > >Subject: Re: [SIGMETRICS] Peer Review Scandals > > > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > >This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours > >because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is > >to say whether the results are important enough to publish in the > >reviewing journal. > >Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, weeks, > >months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are > >very different things, hence so are review and replication.. > > > >As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the > >original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There > >may be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which > >is not conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a > >result the replication attempt may fail simply because something was > >done > differently. > >This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife > >recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied > >chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same > >recipe and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a > >hole in the middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so > >failure to replicate is not telling. > > > >David Wojick > >http://insidepublicaccess.com/ > >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ > > > >At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > > >Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > > >http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > > > > >David Wojick claimed: > > >|------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >|---- > ----| > > >|"[. . > .] | > > >| > | > > >|Of course peer review has nothing to do with > replication." | > > >|------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >|---- > ----| > > > > > >It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not > > >involve replication. > > > > > >|------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >|-- > > >|---- > > ---| > > >|"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a > > >|year, > > but it| > > >|only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad > > claims | > > >|of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what > > social | > > >|movements feed on, and there is plenty to go > > around. | > > >| > > | > > >|[. . > > .]" | > > >|------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >|-- > > >|---- > > ---| > > > > > >Lack of replication harms science. > > > > > >Regards, > > >C. Gloster From zehrayanar at GMAIL.COM Sun Jul 20 10:35:31 2014 From: zehrayanar at GMAIL.COM (=?UTF-8?Q?Zehra_TA=C5=9EKIN?=) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:35:31 +0300 Subject: ICKM2014 Preliminary Program is available (November, 24-26, 2014, Antalya, Turkey) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues: The preliminary program of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM2014) is now available. The early bird registration is open till July 31st, 2014 along with regular (till November 3rd, 2014) and on-site registration. To register, please visit http://viyatour.com/ickm2014/ This year ICKM2014 (http://ickm2014.bilgiyonetimi.net) is taking place at the Miracle Hotel in Antalya, Turkey, from November 24-26, 2014 and is jointly organized with IMCW2014, the 5th International Symposium on Information Management in a Changing World. When you register for ICKM2014, you will be able to attend IMCW sessions and vice versa (IMCW2014 preliminary program is also available at: http://imcw2014.bilgiyonetimi.net/program/). ICKM2014 is organized by the Department of Information Management of Hacettepe University in cooperation with the University of North Texas. The main theme of the ICKM2014 this year is "*Innovation, Knowledge Discovery and Technology Management*". The keynote speaker is Prof. *Michael Kristiansson* of the Royal School of Library and Information Science, University of Copenhagen (Denmark) along with three outstanding invited speakers, Prof. *Gobinda Chowdhury* of Northumbria University (UK), Prof.* Aykut Ar?kan* of Yeditepe University (Turkey) and Prof. *Tun? Medeni* of Y?ld?r?m Beyaz?t University (Turkey). (For the abstracts of keynote and invited speeches, see http://ickm2014.bilgiyonetimi.net/ under "Speeches".) In addition, the program includes contributed papers and workshops along with two panel discussions, one on a knowledge mapping project (BIHAP) and the other on "ISchools and the Globalization of LIS Education" featuring Prof. *Michael Seadle*, current Chair of the ISchools Caucus (Humboldt University) and the Deans and Directors of the ISchools Prof. *Herman Tottorn *(University of North Texas), Prof. *Gobinda Chowdhury* (Northumbria University), and Prof. *Claire McInerney* (Rutgers University). Looking forward to meeting you in November in Antalya, Turkey. *Yasar Tonta & Suliman Hawamdeh* *General Co-chairs, ICKM2014* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zehrayanar at GMAIL.COM Mon Jul 21 02:14:21 2014 From: zehrayanar at GMAIL.COM (Zehra TASKIN) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:14:21 +0300 Subject: IMCW2014 Preliminary Programme is available (November, 24-26, 2014, Antalya, Turkey) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues: The preliminary program of the 5th International Symposium on Information Management in a Changing World (IMCW2014) is now available. The early bird registration is open till July 31st, 2014 along with regular (till November 3rd, 2014) and on-site registration. To register, please visit http://viyatour.com/imcw2014/ This year IMCW2014 ( http://imcw2014.bilgiyonetimi.net) is taking place at the Miracle Hotel in Antalya, Turkey, from November 24-26, 2014 and is jointly organized with ICKM2014, the 10th International Conferene on Knowledge Management. When you register for IMCW2014, you will be able to attend ICKM sessions and vice versa (ICKM2014 preliminary program is also available at: http://ickm2014.bilgiyonetimi.net/program). The main theme of the IMCW2014 this year is "Research Data Management and Knowledge Discovery". This year program includes outstanding keynote speakers: Kevin Ashley, Director of Digital Curation Centre (UK) and Prof. Michael Seadle, Director of the Berlin School of Library and Information Science. As IMCW2014 is organized by the Department of Information Management of Hacettepe University in cooperation with the Goethe-Institut in Turkey to commemorate the Turkish-German Science Year of 2014, we also have outstanding invited speakers from Germany. (For the abstracts of keynote and invited speeches, see http://imcw2014.bilgiyonetimi.net/ under "Speeches".) In addition, the program includes contributed papers, short communications and workshops along with a panel discussion on "Legal, Privacy, Security and Ethical Issues in Research Data Management". Looking forward to meeting you in November in Antalya, Turkey. Yasar Tonta, Serap Kurbanoglu & Nico Sandfuchs General Co-chairs, IMCW2014 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG Mon Jul 21 09:44:45 2014 From: de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG (C. Gloster) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:44:45 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140718152526.06372ec8@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: On July 18th, 2014, David Wojick sent: |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[. . .] I was involved in the cold fusion case and there were hundreds of | |attempts at replication by different research groups. When they all failed | |the judgement became clear, but only then. | | | |My best regards, | | | |David" | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| How was the judgement not clear when there were only 199 demonstrations of no cold fusion but the judgement was clear when there were 200 demonstrations of no cold fusion? From de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG Mon Jul 21 10:22:15 2014 From: de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG (C. Gloster) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:22:15 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140718143242.063101b8@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: On July 18th, 2014, C. Gloster sent: |-------------------------------------------------------------------| |"It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not| |involve replication." | |-------------------------------------------------------------------| On July 18th, 2014, David Wojick sent: |-----------------------------| |"This is a common confusion."| |-----------------------------| Really? |-------------------------------------------------| |" A typical peer review takes a few hours because| |it just involves reading the paper." | |-------------------------------------------------| Peer review involves reading something which was submitted to a funding agency. Refereeing involves reading something which was submitted to a journal. Were you confused as to what peer review is? Typical peer reviewing or refereeing should not take only a few hours. Your responses that things are the way they are therefore things are the way that they should be is baloney. So-called science is severely broken. |----------------------------------------------------------------------| |" The primary objective is to say whether | |the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing journal."| |----------------------------------------------------------------------| This thread was started as a result of referees not even checking the supposed results. |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, weeks, months| |or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are very different | |things, hence so are review and replication.." | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| Review does not mean reading. Research does entail reading. On July 18th, 2014, C. Gloster sent: |-----------------------------------| |"Lack of replication harms science.| | | |Regards, | |C. Gloster" | |-----------------------------------| On July 18th, 2014, David Wojick sent: |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the | |original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may be | |a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not conveyed | |in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the replication | |attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. This has been| |discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife recently pointed out an| |amusing example from baking, which is applied chemistry. Forty people each | |made an angel food cake from the same recipe and all the resulting cakes had | |in common was that each had a hole in the middle. Journal articles seldom | |provide even a recipe, so failure to replicate is not telling. | | | |David Wojick" | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| The article was vague. To inflate my publication history, may I have your permission to suggest you as a referee? I could claim that I found a mistake in the initial cold-fusion claims and that now I really can produce cold fusion. As you would be a referee, it clearly would not be necessary to substantiate my boasts with reality nor even plausible evidence. From de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG Mon Jul 21 12:36:29 2014 From: de_Ghloucester at NINTHFLOOR.ORG (C. Gloster) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:36:29 +0000 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6daf81c7658c48a58cb9d96f8ee9f399@CO1PR06MB174.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> Message-ID: On July 18th, 2014, Stephen J. Bensman sent: |--------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[. . .] There is a need for replication, [. . .] What would you | |say to combining the two functions--an article could not be | |published unless its research can be replicated? In other words, | |with the data easily accessible, editors could send the article for | |replication before publishing. No publication without replication."| |--------------------------------------------------------------------| There is an argument for it. If we can have "The All Results Journals: Phys" ( WWW.ARJournals.com/ojs/ ) and others (for example as listed by WWW.PsychFileDrawer.org/journal_of_negative_results.php ) and if we shall have "the Journal of Failed Experiments" ( HTTP://WWW.JFExp.com ) then why not also "Journal of Replicated Chemical Engineering" et cetera to complement them? |---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Almost sounds like a revolutionary chant you can shout in the street| |while rioting." | |---------------------------------------------------------------------| It is not revolutionary. Refereeing was supposed to guarantee against fraud. Refereeing failed to guarantee against fraud. Instead of retracting this boast, gatekeepers retconned by claiming that it was only people who did not understand refereeing who claimed retraction for fraud proves that refereeing fails to detect fraud. |----------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[. . .] | | | |There is more than cakes being cooked in various kitchens. There is a| |lot of data also being cooked. | | | |Stephen J. Bensman" | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| This is unfortunately true. From dpv at COMPLEXMATTER.ORG Mon Jul 21 19:15:46 2014 From: dpv at COMPLEXMATTER.ORG (Dowman P Varn) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:15:46 -0700 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20140718152526.06372ec8@pop.craigellachie.us> Message-ID: David, I used the example of cold fusion because it was well-known. However, let me consider a much less well-known example, from my own field of research. It was thought for thirty years that a faulting mechanism in SiC was due to something called "layer-displacement faulting." Within the past few years, another group, with vastly improved experimental equipment and analysis techniques challenged this conclusion. They were able to show, both experimentally and by subsequent analysis, that the original conclusions were based on unfounded assumptions, and they could explain both the original data on which the 30 years old conclusions were based, as well as new data. The older analysis could not explain the newer results. They contacted the original experimental group to confirm several aspects of the original experiments, and subsequently were able to give a very convincing narrative that supported their contention that "deformation faulting" was the primary route to disorder in these materials under these experimental conditions. Based on a single paper, I, as well as the original researchers, are convinced that the early work had significant procedural flaws, and the new analysis is correct. A single paper. Well done, well researched, well argued, and it supplants previous work. One paper can be enough. It is unlikely that many experiments will get repeated hundreds of times by various groups before the experts reach a conclusion. Cold fusion is an exception. To ask so much of science is set unrealistic goals. Now, there is few philosophical point here. I am a Bayesian. I am happy to say that something is known not to an absolute certainty, but instead to a very high one. (Or even that the evidence is split amongst several viewpoints, and a conclusion is not justified.) And I'm always open to additional results, experiments, analyses and arguments that may contradict my world view. I happily update my prior expectations based on new information. And I think that this is how science should work. Best regards, Dowman On 18 July 2014 12:30, David Wojick wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > Dowman, I do not consider a single failure of replication to be compelling > evidence against the original research, far from it. Especially not if the > procedure is complex, subtle or delicate. I was involved in the cold fusion > case and there were hundreds of attempts at replication by different > research groups. When they all failed the judgement became clear, but only > then. > > My best regards, > > David > > > At 03:08 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > David, > > Your first point is spot-on, but I must take issue with the second. > Repeatability of experimental work is a cornerstone of science. While some > observations are inherently unrepeatable, for example the discovery of a > rare fossil, others are not. For example, the cold fusion debacle of the > late 80's and early 90's revolved around the inability of numerous other > groups to repeat the experiment. While unrepeatability may be due to > factors other than a mistake in the original research, we'd be foolish not > to consider failed efforts to repeat an experiment as evidence of error in > the original. Perhaps not decisive evidence, but compelling evidence > nonetheless. > > Regards, > > Dowman > > > On 18 July 2014 11:55, David Wojick wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours > because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to say > whether the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing > journal. Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, > weeks, months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are > very different things, hence so are review and replication.. > > As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the > original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may > be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not > conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the > replication attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. > This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife > recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied > chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same recipe > and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a hole in the > middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so failure to > replicate is not telling. > > David Wojick > http://insidepublicaccess.com/ > http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ > > > At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > David Wojick claimed: > > |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"[. . .] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | > | ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | > |Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? | > > |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not > involve replication. > > > |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but > it| > |only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims > ? | > |of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social ? > ? ? | > |movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? | > | ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | > |[. . .]" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | > > > |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > Lack of replication harms science. > > Regards, > C. Gloster > > > > > -- > ______________________________ > Dowman P Varn, PhD > Complexity Sciences Center & Department of Physics ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > University of California,? One Shields Ave > Davis, CA 95616 > > Cell:? 646.228.7256 ? > Email: dpv at complexmatter.org > Web site: wissenplatz.org > -- ______________________________ Dowman P Varn, PhD Complexity Sciences Center & Department of Physics University of California, One Shields Ave Davis, CA 95616 Cell: 646.228.7256 Email: dpv at complexmatter.org Web site: wissenplatz.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dpv at COMPLEXMATTER.ORG Mon Jul 21 19:41:16 2014 From: dpv at COMPLEXMATTER.ORG (Dowman P Varn) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:41:16 -0700 Subject: Peer Review Scandals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Davis & Stephen, I come from a physics background, and much what you discuss bears little resemblance to the facts on the ground. No one given a manuscript would ever try to replicate the results. It could take months of full time work, and is simply an unreasonable burden on the reviewer. Science would just stop. The purpose of peer-review (and yes, I use that term in the sense of an expert reading and evaluating a manuscript for publication, as this is the common vernacular in my field) is not to ensure that the results are correct. Instead, peer review seeks to determine if the paper has obvious mistakes or omissions, if it is original, and that if it is relevant to the journal. It also checks that the conclusions made by the authors are supported by the evidence presented, and that the work is presented in a way the other experts in the field will understand. And that's about it. And, to my mind, that's all it should be. For a philosophical point of view, I can't imagine that journals are meant to be repository of the one and true knowledge. Journals are discussions amongst experts. And experts disagree. If the answer really were known, then there'd be no reason for the journal, it'd be on Wikipedia. Journals are a place where experts can exchange methods, results, opinions, calculations, observations, and the like. I don't read a journal article as gospel, but rather as a document where I cast the onus on the authors to convince me of something. Often I'm not convinced. There are entire little subfields that, in my opinion, are founded on flawed assumptions, and therefore the conclusions reached are dubious. I recognise that that is just my opinion, and I don't begrudge them (too much) for the work they do, because I realise that I may be wrong. As for the issue of fraud, peer review is not the place to catch it, unless it is rather inartfully done. How can say that an observation wasn't made? How can I say that the result of a detailed calculation is wrong? I'm not going to do it myself. As a reviewer, I can point out the objections and concerns of a expert, perhaps many that the authors had yet to consider, but at the end of the day, it is their contribution to the conversation. If they have something interesting to say, can explain it in a reasonable way, and are sufficiently familiar with the state of field to discuss it intelligently, who am I to say they are wrong? That is for the community to decide. And, in my opinion, that is how science should work. Best regards, Dowman On 21 July 2014 16:15, Dowman P Varn wrote: > David, > > I used the example of cold fusion because it was well-known. However, let > me consider a much less well-known example, from my own field of research. > It was thought for thirty years that a faulting mechanism in SiC was due to > something called "layer-displacement faulting." Within the past few years, > another group, with vastly improved experimental equipment and analysis > techniques challenged this conclusion. They were able to show, both > experimentally and by subsequent analysis, that the original conclusions > were based on unfounded assumptions, and they could explain both the > original data on which the 30 years old conclusions were based, as well as > new data. The older analysis could not explain the newer results. They > contacted the original experimental group to confirm several aspects of the > original experiments, and subsequently were able to give a very convincing > narrative that supported their contention that "deformation faulting" was > the primary route to disorder in these materials under these experimental > conditions. Based on a single paper, I, as well as the original > researchers, are convinced that the early work had significant procedural > flaws, and the new analysis is correct. A single paper. Well done, well > researched, well argued, and it supplants previous work. One paper can be > enough. > > It is unlikely that many experiments will get repeated hundreds of times > by various groups before the experts reach a conclusion. Cold fusion is an > exception. To ask so much of science is set unrealistic goals. > > Now, there is few philosophical point here. I am a Bayesian. I am happy to > say that something is known not to an absolute certainty, but instead to a > very high one. (Or even that the evidence is split amongst several > viewpoints, and a conclusion is not justified.) And I'm always open to > additional results, experiments, analyses and arguments that may contradict > my world view. I happily update my prior expectations based on new > information. And I think that this is how science should work. > > Best regards, > > Dowman > > > On 18 July 2014 12:30, David Wojick wrote: > >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> Dowman, I do not consider a single failure of replication to be >> compelling evidence against the original research, far from it. Especially >> not if the procedure is complex, subtle or delicate. I was involved in the >> cold fusion case and there were hundreds of attempts at replication by >> different research groups. When they all failed the judgement became clear, >> but only then. >> >> My best regards, >> >> David >> >> >> At 03:08 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >> >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> David, >> >> Your first point is spot-on, but I must take issue with the second. >> Repeatability of experimental work is a cornerstone of science. While some >> observations are inherently unrepeatable, for example the discovery of a >> rare fossil, others are not. For example, the cold fusion debacle of the >> late 80's and early 90's revolved around the inability of numerous other >> groups to repeat the experiment. While unrepeatability may be due to >> factors other than a mistake in the original research, we'd be foolish not >> to consider failed efforts to repeat an experiment as evidence of error in >> the original. Perhaps not decisive evidence, but compelling evidence >> nonetheless. >> >> Regards, >> >> Dowman >> >> >> On 18 July 2014 11:55, David Wojick wrote: >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> >> This is a common confusion. A typical peer review takes a few hours >> because it just involves reading the paper. The primary objective is to say >> whether the results are important enough to publish in the reviewing >> journal. Replication means repeating the research, which may take days, >> weeks, months or more, depending on the project. Reading and research are >> very different things, hence so are review and replication.. >> >> As for your second claim, failure to replicate does not show that the >> original research is unsound. This is another common confusion. There may >> be a lot of procedural subtlety in the original research, which is not >> conveyed in the journal article, which is very brief. As a result the >> replication attempt may fail simply because something was done differently. >> This has been discussed at length at The Scholarly Kitchen. My wife >> recently pointed out an amusing example from baking, which is applied >> chemistry. Forty people each made an angel food cake from the same recipe >> and all the resulting cakes had in common was that each had a hole in the >> middle. Journal articles seldom provide even a recipe, so failure to >> replicate is not telling. >> >> David Wojick >> http://insidepublicaccess.com/ >> http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/dwojick/ >> >> >> At 02:31 PM 7/18/2014, you wrote: >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> >> David Wojick claimed: >> >> |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> |"[. . .] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >> | ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >> |Of course peer review has nothing to do with replication." ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? | >> >> |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> >> It is dubious to claim that being approved by reviewers should not >> involve replication. >> >> >> |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> |"My guess is there are between 5 and 10 million peer reviews a year, but >> it| >> |only takes 4 or 5 anecdotes, some way off base, to generate broad claims >> ? | >> |of wholesale corruption, that is hurting science. This is what social ? >> ? ? | >> |movements feed on, and there is plenty to go around. ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? ? | >> | ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >> |[. . .]" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | >> >> >> |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> >> Lack of replication harms science. >> >> Regards, >> C. Gloster >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ______________________________ >> Dowman P Varn, PhD >> Complexity Sciences Center & Department of Physics ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> University of California,? One Shields Ave >> Davis, CA 95616 >> >> Cell:? 646.228.7256 ? >> Email: dpv at complexmatter.org >> Web site: wissenplatz.org >> > > > > -- > ______________________________ > Dowman P Varn, PhD > Complexity Sciences Center & Department of Physics > > University of California, One Shields Ave > Davis, CA 95616 > > Cell: 646.228.7256 > Email: dpv at complexmatter.org > Web site: wissenplatz.org > -- ______________________________ Dowman P Varn, PhD Complexity Sciences Center & Department of Physics University of California, One Shields Ave Davis, CA 95616 Cell: 646.228.7256 Email: dpv at complexmatter.org Web site: wissenplatz.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Tue Jul 22 11:34:59 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:34:59 +0200 Subject: Ranking Web of Repositories Message-ID: The new edition (July 2014) of the Ranking Web of Repositories has been just published http://repositories.webometrics.info/ The ranking is published since 2008 and its main aim is to promote the Green Road to Open Access supporting and monitoring the evolution of thousands of repositories worldwide. The inclusion criteria are more demanding than those from other directories, as only repositories with their own web domain or subdomain are accepted. Methodological criteria are maintained with minor changes from the previous edition. The Visibility indicator again incorporates altmetrics mentions from the following sources: Academia, Facebook, LinkedIn, Mendeley, ResearchGate, Slideshare, Twitter, Wikipedia (all editions), Wikipedia (English version) and YouTube. And now Scholar indicator is obtained by combining four variables obtained from Google Scholar: number of articles, published between 2009 and 2013, PDF files (with appropriate suffix) and pdf files dating from 2009 to 2013. The most important innovation is the inclusion of ResearchGate, Academia and Mendeley in the Ranking of portals. It has been done to draw attention to a candidate problem, as certain authors are placing their papers on these websites instead of their own institutional repositories. The limited added value provided by the current generation of repository software and the slow implementation by repository managers of services like author profiles, metrics and other customization options are leading to an unfortunate trend that could mean those "competitors" will frustrate the objective of achieving comprehensive deposit of scientific production of the institution. As for results, subject repositories continue to lead the table: Arxiv.org e-Print Archive, Social Science Research Network, Europe PubMed Central Research Papers in Economics. Several of the repositories implemented by HAL (France) and the combination of the various universities into a unique University of California repository are the main institutional highlights. Regarding Portals, the SciELO network shows the now global success of this initiative. -- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com From notsjb at LSU.EDU Tue Jul 22 12:01:11 2014 From: notsjb at LSU.EDU (Stephen J Bensman) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:01:11 +0000 Subject: Ranking Web of Repositories In-Reply-To: <53CE84A3.1030605@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: Thanks for this. We seem to be on the same wave length. I have forwarded this to the people here at LSU in charge of establishing our repository and book marked the site for myself. Stephen J Bensman LSU Libraries Lousiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 -----Original Message----- From: ASIS&T Special Interest Group on Metrics [mailto:SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU] On Behalf Of Isidro F. Aguillo Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:35 AM To: SIGMETRICS at LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: [SIGMETRICS] Ranking Web of Repositories The new edition (July 2014) of the Ranking Web of Repositories has been just published http://repositories.webometrics.info/ The ranking is published since 2008 and its main aim is to promote the Green Road to Open Access supporting and monitoring the evolution of thousands of repositories worldwide. The inclusion criteria are more demanding than those from other directories, as only repositories with their own web domain or subdomain are accepted. Methodological criteria are maintained with minor changes from the previous edition. The Visibility indicator again incorporates altmetrics mentions from the following sources: Academia, Facebook, LinkedIn, Mendeley, ResearchGate, Slideshare, Twitter, Wikipedia (all editions), Wikipedia (English version) and YouTube. And now Scholar indicator is obtained by combining four variables obtained from Google Scholar: number of articles, published between 2009 and 2013, PDF files (with appropriate suffix) and pdf files dating from 2009 to 2013. The most important innovation is the inclusion of ResearchGate, Academia and Mendeley in the Ranking of portals. It has been done to draw attention to a candidate problem, as certain authors are placing their papers on these websites instead of their own institutional repositories. The limited added value provided by the current generation of repository software and the slow implementation by repository managers of services like author profiles, metrics and other customization options are leading to an unfortunate trend that could mean those "competitors" will frustrate the objective of achieving comprehensive deposit of scientific production of the institution. As for results, subject repositories continue to lead the table: Arxiv.org e-Print Archive, Social Science Research Network, Europe PubMed Central Research Papers in Economics. Several of the repositories implemented by HAL (France) and the combination of the various universities into a unique University of California repository are the main institutional highlights. Regarding Portals, the SciELO network shows the now global success of this initiative. -- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC Grupo Scimago Madrid. SPAIN isidro.aguillo at csic.es ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ Twitter: @isidroaguillo Rankings Web: webometrics.info >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! Antivirus est? activa. http://www.avast.com From william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM Tue Jul 22 17:47:25 2014 From: william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM (William Gunn) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:47:25 -0700 Subject: Ranking Web of Repositories In-Reply-To: <53CE84A3.1030605@cchs.csic.es> Message-ID: I would like to point out re: the suggestion that scientific social networks are somehow inhibiting open access that Mendeley has worked with Symplectic to facilitate deposit of anything on a researcher's Mendeley profile to their local IR. In addition, Mendeley has an Open API, so could be a useful service to help identify authors who have new outputs that haven't been deposited with their institution. This puts us in an entirely separate class from the other sites mentioned. Best, -- William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Isidro F. Aguillo < isidro.aguillo at cchs.csic.es> wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > The new edition (July 2014) of the Ranking Web of Repositories has been > just published > > http://repositories.webometrics.info/ > > The ranking is published since 2008 and its main aim is to promote the > Green Road to Open Access supporting and monitoring the evolution of > thousands of repositories worldwide. The inclusion criteria are more > demanding than those from other directories, as only repositories with > their own web domain or subdomain are accepted. > > Methodological criteria are maintained with minor changes from the > previous edition. The Visibility indicator again incorporates altmetrics > mentions from the following sources: Academia, Facebook, LinkedIn, > Mendeley, ResearchGate, Slideshare, Twitter, Wikipedia (all editions), > Wikipedia (English version) and YouTube. And now Scholar indicator is > obtained by combining four variables obtained from Google Scholar: number > of articles, published between 2009 and 2013, PDF files (with appropriate > suffix) and pdf files dating from 2009 to 2013. > > The most important innovation is the inclusion of ResearchGate, Academia > and Mendeley in the Ranking of portals. It has been done to draw attention > to a candidate problem, as certain authors are placing their papers on > these websites instead of their own institutional repositories. The limited > added value provided by the current generation of repository software and > the slow implementation by repository managers of services like author > profiles, metrics and other customization options are leading to an > unfortunate trend that could mean those "competitors" will frustrate the > objective of achieving comprehensive deposit of scientific production of > the institution. > > As for results, subject repositories continue to lead the table: Arxiv.org > e-Print Archive, Social Science Research Network, Europe PubMed Central > Research Papers in Economics. Several of the repositories implemented by > HAL (France) and the combination of the various universities into a unique > University of California repository are the main institutional highlights. > Regarding Portals, the SciELO network shows the now global success of this > initiative. > > -- > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. > The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC > Grupo Scimago > Madrid. SPAIN > > isidro.aguillo at csic.es > ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 > ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 > Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ > Twitter: @isidroaguillo > Rankings Web: webometrics.info > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > --- > Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! > Antivirus est? activa. > http://www.avast.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES Tue Jul 22 17:59:04 2014 From: isidro.aguillo at CCHS.CSIC.ES (Isidro F. Aguillo) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:59:04 +0200 Subject: Ranking Web of Repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear William, Thanks for the info and the very practical service you describe. That is exactly my point, the repositories should try to match the level of services offered, for example, by your company. Obviously Mendeley has an important role as global actor in the system, but local action is badly needed and the added value of institutional repositories should be improved far beyond the current status. Best regards, William Gunn escribi?: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > I would like to point out re: the suggestion that scientific social > networks are somehow inhibiting open access that Mendeley has worked with > Symplectic to facilitate deposit of anything on a researcher's Mendeley > profile to their local IR. In addition, Mendeley has an Open API, so could > be a useful service to help identify authors who have new outputs that > haven't been deposited with their institution. This puts us in an entirely > separate class from the other sites mentioned. > > Best, > > -- > William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn > http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Isidro F. Aguillo < > isidro.aguillo at cchs.csic.es> wrote: > >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> >> The new edition (July 2014) of the Ranking Web of Repositories has been >> just published >> >> http://repositories.webometrics.info/ >> >> The ranking is published since 2008 and its main aim is to promote the >> Green Road to Open Access supporting and monitoring the evolution of >> thousands of repositories worldwide. The inclusion criteria are more >> demanding than those from other directories, as only repositories with >> their own web domain or subdomain are accepted. >> >> Methodological criteria are maintained with minor changes from the >> previous edition. The Visibility indicator again incorporates altmetrics >> mentions from the following sources: Academia, Facebook, LinkedIn, >> Mendeley, ResearchGate, Slideshare, Twitter, Wikipedia (all editions), >> Wikipedia (English version) and YouTube. And now Scholar indicator is >> obtained by combining four variables obtained from Google Scholar: number >> of articles, published between 2009 and 2013, PDF files (with appropriate >> suffix) and pdf files dating from 2009 to 2013. >> >> The most important innovation is the inclusion of ResearchGate, Academia >> and Mendeley in the Ranking of portals. It has been done to draw attention >> to a candidate problem, as certain authors are placing their papers on >> these websites instead of their own institutional repositories. The limited >> added value provided by the current generation of repository software and >> the slow implementation by repository managers of services like author >> profiles, metrics and other customization options are leading to an >> unfortunate trend that could mean those "competitors" will frustrate the >> objective of achieving comprehensive deposit of scientific production of >> the institution. >> >> As for results, subject repositories continue to lead the table: Arxiv.org >> e-Print Archive, Social Science Research Network, Europe PubMed Central >> Research Papers in Economics. Several of the repositories implemented by >> HAL (France) and the combination of the various universities into a unique >> University of California repository are the main institutional highlights. >> Regarding Portals, the SciELO network shows the now global success of this >> initiative. >> >> -- >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. >> The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC >> Grupo Scimago >> Madrid. SPAIN >> >> isidro.aguillo at csic.es >> ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 >> ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 >> Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ >> Twitter: @isidroaguillo >> Rankings Web: webometrics.info >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> --- >> Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! >> Antivirus est? activa. >> http://www.avast.com >> -- Isidro F. Aguillo, HonPhD Cybermetrics Lab (3C1). CCHS - CSIC Albasanz, 26-28. 28037 Madrid. Spain isidro.aguillo @ cchs.csic.es www. webometrics.info From william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM Tue Jul 22 18:39:14 2014 From: william.gunn at MENDELEY.COM (William Gunn) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:39:14 -0700 Subject: Ranking Web of Repositories In-Reply-To: <20140722235904.Horde.fDwygSmKGAsq813U_SEnMg1@webmail.csic.es> Message-ID: No disagreement there, and in fact we discussed this a little at the OKFN FEST in Berlin recently. There are two major issues with getting to compete directly with global commercial services: economy of scale and developer motivation. A global service like Mendeley can spend sums larger than any repository budget on marketing and outreach. This isn't insurmountable, but it does require solving the collective action problem. All repositories need to pool resources and choose to spend lots of time and money on getting adoption. The developer issue is a tougher one, because there's lots more to attract the best developers to a global service that they have a reputational and financial stake in. These are the people who are building the compelling features. In addition, the aim of a service like Mendeley is first and foremost to build something researchers want. If they don't want what we built, we would change what we're building until we find something they do, or we'd go out of business and another company would take a shot at it. Repositories can't go out of business nor can they drastically change what they are, so by necessity, researchers come at least second, and that affects adoption. The Linux/Apache ecosystem has solved this in open source, so it's doable in open access. William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 On Jul 22, 2014 2:59 PM, "Isidro F. Aguillo" wrote: > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): > http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html > > Dear William, > > Thanks for the info and the very practical service you describe. That is > exactly my point, the repositories should try to match the level of > services offered, for example, by your company. Obviously Mendeley has an > important role as global actor in the system, but local action is badly > needed and the added value of institutional repositories should be improved > far beyond the current status. > > Best regards, > > > William Gunn escribi?: > > Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >> >> I would like to point out re: the suggestion that scientific social >> networks are somehow inhibiting open access that Mendeley has worked with >> Symplectic to facilitate deposit of anything on a researcher's Mendeley >> profile to their local IR. In addition, Mendeley has an Open API, so could >> be a useful service to help identify authors who have new outputs that >> haven't been deposited with their institution. This puts us in an entirely >> separate class from the other sites mentioned. >> >> Best, >> >> -- >> William Gunn | Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley | @mrgunn >> http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/william-gunn | (650) 614-1749 >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Isidro F. Aguillo < >> isidro.aguillo at cchs.csic.es> wrote: >> >> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe): >>> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html >>> >>> The new edition (July 2014) of the Ranking Web of Repositories has been >>> just published >>> >>> http://repositories.webometrics.info/ >>> >>> The ranking is published since 2008 and its main aim is to promote the >>> Green Road to Open Access supporting and monitoring the evolution of >>> thousands of repositories worldwide. The inclusion criteria are more >>> demanding than those from other directories, as only repositories with >>> their own web domain or subdomain are accepted. >>> >>> Methodological criteria are maintained with minor changes from the >>> previous edition. The Visibility indicator again incorporates altmetrics >>> mentions from the following sources: Academia, Facebook, LinkedIn, >>> Mendeley, ResearchGate, Slideshare, Twitter, Wikipedia (all editions), >>> Wikipedia (English version) and YouTube. And now Scholar indicator is >>> obtained by combining four variables obtained from Google Scholar: number >>> of articles, published between 2009 and 2013, PDF files (with appropriate >>> suffix) and pdf files dating from 2009 to 2013. >>> >>> The most important innovation is the inclusion of ResearchGate, Academia >>> and Mendeley in the Ranking of portals. It has been done to draw >>> attention >>> to a candidate problem, as certain authors are placing their papers on >>> these websites instead of their own institutional repositories. The >>> limited >>> added value provided by the current generation of repository software and >>> the slow implementation by repository managers of services like author >>> profiles, metrics and other customization options are leading to an >>> unfortunate trend that could mean those "competitors" will frustrate the >>> objective of achieving comprehensive deposit of scientific production of >>> the institution. >>> >>> As for results, subject repositories continue to lead the table: >>> Arxiv.org >>> e-Print Archive, Social Science Research Network, Europe PubMed Central >>> Research Papers in Economics. Several of the repositories implemented by >>> HAL (France) and the combination of the various universities into a >>> unique >>> University of California repository are the main institutional >>> highlights. >>> Regarding Portals, the SciELO network shows the now global success of >>> this >>> initiative. >>> >>> -- >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> Isidro F. Aguillo, HonDr. >>> The Cybermetrics Lab, IPP-CSIC >>> Grupo Scimago >>> Madrid. SPAIN >>> >>> isidro.aguillo at csic.es >>> ORCID: 0000-0001-8927-4873 >>> ResearcherID: A-7280-2008 >>> Scholar Citations: SaCSbeoAAAAJ >>> Twitter: @isidroaguillo >>> Rankings Web: webometrics.info >>> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> --- >>> Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protecci?n de avast! >>> Antivirus est? activa. >>> http://www.avast.com >>> >>> > > -- > Isidro F. Aguillo, HonPhD > Cybermetrics Lab (3C1). CCHS - CSIC > Albasanz, 26-28. 28037 Madrid. Spain > > isidro.aguillo @ cchs.csic.es > www. webometrics.info > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Peter.Mutschke at GESIS.ORG Fri Jul 25 07:54:03 2014 From: Peter.Mutschke at GESIS.ORG (Mutschke, Peter) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:54:03 +0000 Subject: Call for Participation: Workshop on Knowledge Maps and Information Retrieval (KMIR) at DL 2014 Message-ID: CALL FOR PARTICIPATION Knowledge Maps and Information Retrieval (KMIR) Workshop at Digital Libraries 2014 11th September 2014, London, UK Workshop page: http://www.gesis.org/en/events/conferences/kmir2014/ Conference page: http://www.dl2014.org We are pleased to announce the upcoming halfday workshop on Knowledge Maps and Information Retrieval (KMIR), to be held as part of the International Conference on Digital Libraries 2014 - ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2014) and International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2014), London, 8th-12th September 2014 (http://www.dl2014.org/). Abstract: Knowledge maps are promising tools for visualizing the structure of large-scale information spaces, but still far away from being applicable for searching. The workshop aims at bringing together experts in IR and knowledge mapping in order to discuss the potential of interactive knowledge maps for information seeking purposes. We now have a very good program together for the KMIR workshop. Consult the workshop page (see above) for the preliminary program. If you will attend the workshop, don't forget to register for workshops at die DL2014 registration page. In addition, please notify me (CC to my secretary julia.achenbach at gesi.org) about your attendance. Kind regards, Peter Mutschke -- Acting Head of Department Dep. Knowledge Technologies for the Social Sciences GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8 D-50667 K?ln Tel.: +49(0)221 / 47694 -500 Mail: peter.mutschke at gesis.org www.gesis.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cassidysugimoto at GMAIL.COM Sat Jul 26 13:17:13 2014 From: cassidysugimoto at GMAIL.COM (Cassidy Sugimoto) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:17:13 -0400 Subject: iConference Message-ID: iConference 2015 *Now Accepting Submissions* March 24-27, 2015 Newport Beach, CA USA http://ischools.org/the-iconference/ We are now accepting submissions for iConference 2015. Submissions may be made on our secure submissions site at https://www.conftool.com/iConference2015/ The iConference is an international gathering of scholars and researchers concerned with critical information issues in contemporary society. The following submissions are invited: *Submission Type* *Deadline* *Notification* Papers Friday, September 5, 2014, midnight PDT mid-November Posters Friday, October 10, 2014, midnight PDT mid-November Workshops Friday, September 26, 2014, midnight PDT Monday, October 27, 2014 Interactive Sessions Friday, October 10, 2014, midnight PDT mid-November Doctoral Colloquium Friday, September 12, 2014, midnight PDT Friday, October 24, 2014 Social Media Expo Participation commitment letter due October 14, 2014; submissions due December 15, 2014. Thursday, January 15, 2015 Dissertation Award Wednesday, October 15, 2014, midnight PDT Thursday, January 15, 2015 iConference 2015 takes place March 24-27 in Newport Beach, CA. It is presented by the iSchools organization and hosted by The Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences at University of California, Irvine. All information researchers and scholars are welcome. Sample topics of past iConferences include the following: ? social computing ? human-computer interaction ? digital youth ? digital curation and preservation ? information retrieval ? bibliometrics and scholarly communication ? social, cultural, health and community informatics ? knowledge infrastructures ? computer-supported cooperative work ? data, text and knowledge mining ? computational social science ? digital humanities ? network science ? information and communication technology for development ? data science ? information economics ? information work and workers ? user experience and design ? information systems ? information policy The Champion Sponsor of iConference 2015 is Microsoft Research. http://ischools.org/the-iconference/ -- Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD Assistant Professor School of Informatics and Computing Indiana University Bloomington http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anoruzi at GMAIL.COM Tue Jul 29 16:08:58 2014 From: anoruzi at GMAIL.COM (Alireza Noruzi) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:08:58 +0200 Subject: Webology: Volume 11, Number 1, 2014 Message-ID: Dear All, apologies for cross-posting. We are pleased to inform you that Vol. 11, No. 1 of Webology, an OPEN ACCESS bi-annual journal, is published and available ONLINE now. ------------------ Webology: Volume 11, Number 1, 2014 TOC: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/toc.html This issue contains: ------------------------- Articles ------------------------- - The Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Model -- Laura Schumann, & Wolfgang G. Stock -- Keywords: Information services; Technology acceptance; Evaluation -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a115.pdf - A metatheory integrating social, biological and technological factors in information behavior research -- Leon James, & Diane Nahl -- Keywords: Discourse analysis; Constructionism; Information behavior; Technological affordances -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a116.pdf - The cataloging of virtual communities of educational thematic -- Roman Korzh, Andriy Peleschyshyn, Yuriy Syerov, & Solomia Fedushko -- Keywords: Virtual community; Higher Educational Institution; Catalog; Web; Educational web community; Socio-demographic characteristic; Internet -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a117.pdf - Content marketing through data mining on Facebook social network -- Saman Forouzandeh, Heirsh Soltanpanah, & Amir Sheikhahmadi -- Keywords: Social networks; Marketing; Data mining; Decision tree -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a118.pdf - Webometric analysis of Iranian medical universities according to visibility, size and rich files -- Roghaye Tafaroji, Iman Tahamtan, Masoud Roudbari, & Shahram Sedghi -- Keywords: Webometric; Visibility; University ranking; Web Impact Factor; Rich files; Iran; External inlinks; Size; Web sites -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a119.pdf - Non-users of Internet in the information society -- Marina Viktorovna Zagidullina -- Keywords: Internet-using; Non-users; Media-behavior; Russia, Provincialism; Surveys -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a120.pdf - Improvement of methodical approaches to higher schools' marketing activity assessment on the basis of internet technologies application -- Elizaveta E. Tarasova, & Evgeny A. Shein -- Keywords: Marketing activity; Higher schools; Internet technologies; Integral evaluation of assessment indicators; Quality indicators; Functioning indicators -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a121.pdf - Google Patents: The global patent search engine -- Alireza Noruzi, & Mohammadhiwa Abdekhoda -- Keywords: Google Patents; Patent analysis; Patentometric -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a122.pdf ------------------------- Book Review ------------------------- - Visual indexing and retrieval -- Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh, & Elaheh Hosseini -- Keywords: Visual indexing; Image indexing; Image processing; Content indexing; Context indexing; Information retrieval -- URL: http://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/bookreview24.pdf ------------------------- Call for Papers ------------------------- -- http://www.webology.org/callforpapers.html ================================== Best regards, Alireza Noruzi -------------------- Editor-in-Chief of Webology: Alireza Noruzi, Ph.D. Website: http://www.webology.org ~ The great aim of Open Access journals is knowledge sharing. ~ ~ Scientific knowledge is the result of the knowledge sharing and exchange of experiences. ~ From loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET Wed Jul 30 02:16:44 2014 From: loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET (Loet Leydesdorff) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:16:44 +0200 Subject: The Operationalization of "Fields of Science" in Evaluative Bibliometrics; preprint Message-ID: The Operationalization of "Fields" as WoS Subject Categories (WCs) in Evaluative Bibliometrics: The cases of "Library and Information Science" and "Science & Technology Studies" Loet Leydesdorff and Lutz Bornmann Normalization of citation scores using reference sets based on Web-of-Science Subject Categories (WCs) has become an established ("best") practice in evaluative bibliometrics. For example, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings are, among other things, based on this operationalization. However, WCs were developed decades ago for the purpose of information retrieval and evolved incrementally with the database; the classification is machine-based and partially manually corrected. Using the WC "information science & library science" and the WCs attributed to journals in the field of "science and technology studies," we show that WCs do not provide sufficient analytical clarity to carry bibliometric normalization in evaluation practices because of "indexer effects." Can the compliance with "best practices" be replaced with an ambition to develop "best possible practices"? New research questions can then be envisaged. http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.7849 ** apologies for cross-postings _____ Loet Leydesdorff University of Amsterdam Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR) loet at leydesdorff.net ; http://www.leydesdorff.net/ Honorary Professor, SPRU, University of Sussex; Guest Professor Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou; Visiting Professor, ISTIC, Beijing; Visiting Professor, Birkbeck, University of London; http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYAAAAJ&hl=en -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kretschmer.h at T-ONLINE.DE Wed Jul 30 06:31:48 2014 From: kretschmer.h at T-ONLINE.DE (kretschmer.h@t-online.de) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:31:48 +0200 Subject: Program 10th Int. Conf. Webometr., Informetr, Scientom. 15th COLLNET Meeting Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Wed Jul 30 12:43:56 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:43:56 +0000 Subject: papers of possible interest to SigMet readers Message-ID: * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000336829100005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The distribution of partnership returns: Evidence from co-authorships in economics journals Authors: Bidault, F; Hildebrand, T Author Full Names: Bidault, Francis; Hildebrand, Thomas Source: RESEARCH POLICY, 43 (6):1002-1013; 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.008 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Co-authorship, Academic partnership, Joint research, Joint publication, Asymmetric authorship, Distribution of returns KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH COLLABORATION; DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCES; QUALITY; TRUST; DETERMINANTS; COAUTHORSHIP; KNOWLEDGE; FIRMS; TIES; AGE Abstract: Partnerships can be found in many areas of social and economic life. These arrangements have become particularly prevalent in research and development activities where organizations increasingly seek partners to complement their own technological capabilities. R&D partnerships, however, are fraught with challenges because the conditions for optimum effectiveness and efficiency of cooperation are still not fully understood. Academic partnerships are also very common and offer a fertile ground for investigation. Academic cooperation takes many different forms and results in a wide range of outcomes (Laband and Tollison, 2000). One of the most visible outcomes is co-authored publications (Melin and Persson, 1996). Nowadays, there are extensive data available about both the context of these partnerships and the quality of their outcome. This paper explores the distribution of benefits and losses of co-authorship between scholars with asymmetric background, who cooperate through co-authorship in the publication of academic articles. We distinguish between short-term relative returns (i.e. the increase/decrease in citations of a co-authored article relative to the authors' previous publications) and the long-term ones (i.e. the increase/decrease in citations of articles subsequent to the co-authored piece). While the same variables drive the returns (benefits or losses) of both the junior and the senior co-authors, their long-term returns are driven by markedly different, and somewhat opposing, factors. The effect of the co-authors' resources matters more for the senior than for the junior academic partner. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Bidault, Francis] European Sch Management & Technol, D-10178 Berlin, Germany. [Hildebrand, Thomas] E CA Econ, D-10178 Berlin, Germany. E-mail Addresses: francis.bidault at esmt.org Cited Reference Count: 73 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0048-7333 Web of Science Categories: Management; Planning & Development; MANAGEMENT; PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Research Areas: Business & Economics; Public Administration IDS Number: AI4IO Unique ID: WOS:000336829100005 Cited References: Sampson RC, 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V26, P1009 MACNEIL IR, 1974, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, V47, P691 1990, Groups that Work (and Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, Johnson, 1997, American Economist, V41, P42 Reed C.J., 2002, College Teaching, V50, P22 Penrose E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, KOH J, 1991, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V34, P869 Gulati R, 2008, Managerial Decision Econom., V29, P165 Zucker Lynne G., 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior, V8, P53 Katz JS, 1997, RESEARCH POLICY, V26, P1 Glanzel W, 2004, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND PATENT STATISTICS IN STUDIES OF S&T SYSTEMS, P257 BARNETT AH, 1988, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V70, P539 Mairesse J., 2005, Measurement and Explanation of the Intensity of Co-Publication in Scientific Research An Analysis at the Laboratory Level, V11172, Martin B., 2011, Prometheus, V29, P455 Hudson J, 1996, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V10, P153 GULATI R, 1995, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V38, P85 BARNEY J, 1991, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V17, P99 Fleischman R. K., 2009, Accounting, Business & Financial History, V19, P287 Sampson R. C., 2002, Academy of Management Proceedings & Membership Directory, PU1 Steiner I. D., 1972, Group Process and Productivity, Simonton D. K., 2008, Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic and Zeitgeist, Bruno B., 2010, MRPA Paper 27730, Fafchamps M., 2006, Scientific Networks and Co-authorship, Alvarez SA, 2001, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, V15, P139 PIETTE MJ, 1992, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, V23, P277 Acedo FJ, 2006, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V43, P957 RING PS, 1992, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V13, P483 Laband D. N., 1985, Atlantic Economic Journal, V13, P80 Lermarchand G. A., 2012, Research Policy, V41, P291 Ductor L., 2014, Review of Economics and Statistics, MCCONNELL JJ, 1985, JOURNAL OF FINANCE, V40, P519 Melin G, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P363 Kwok LS, 2005, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, V31, P554 Wagner CS, 2005, RESEARCH POLICY, V34, P1608 Hollis A, 2001, LABOUR ECONOMICS, V8, P503 Poppo Laura, 2008, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V19, P39 MCDOWELL JM, 1983, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V65, P155 Das T. K., 2001, Journal of Management, V2, P31 Azoulay Pierre, 2010, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V125, P549 Walstad WB, 2005, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW117th Annual Meeting of the American-Economic-Association, JAN 07, 2005, Philadelphia, PA, V95, P177 Medoff MH, 2003, LABOUR ECONOMICS, V10, P597 Petry G. H., 1981, Journal of Financial Education, V10, P78 Sutter M, 2004, APPLIED ECONOMICS, V36, P327 Azoulay Pierre, 2011, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V42, P527 Waldinger Fabian, 2010, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V118, P787 Jones Benjamin F., 2010, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V92, P1 Laband DN, 2000, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V108, P632 Chung K. H., 2009, Quarterly Review of Economics, V49, P893 SIMONTON DK, 1988, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V104, P251 Anand BN, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V21, P295 Sauer R.D., 1988, Journal of Political Economy, V96, P588 Chan H. S., 1997, Journal of Financial Economics, V46, P199 Ductor L., 2011, Working Paper, Minshall Tim, 2010, RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V53, P53 Carayannopoulos Sofy, 2010, RESEARCH POLICY, V39, P254 Gulati R., 2007, Managing Network Resources: Alliances, Affiliations and Other Relational Assets, Arino A, 2001, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V44, P109 Dahlander Linus, 2013, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V58, P69 Das S, 1998, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V41, P27 Child J., 2005, Cooperative Strategy: Managing Alliances, Networks and Joint Ventures, Santonen T., 2012, Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference, P1 Jonung Christina, 2008, ECON JOURNAL WATCH, V5, P174 Azoulay P., 2010, Working Paper MIT, Hilmer CE, 2005, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, V87, P509 ZAHEER A, 1995, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V16, P373 Pfeiffer G. M., 2001, Journal of High Technology Management Research, V12, P227 Avkiran NK, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICS, V39, P173 Wuchty Stefan, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1036 Laband D., 1994, Journal of Economic Literature, V3, P640 Kalaignanam Kartik, 2007, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V53, P357 Chung K. H., 1993, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, V32, P32 Heinze Thomas, 2009, RESEARCH POLICY40th Conference on the Future of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, SEP 11-13, 2006, Brighton, ENGLAND, V38, P610 Strumpf H., 1995, Educational Psychology Review, V7, P225 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337106000002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Where Do Economists of Faith Hang Out? Their Journals and Associations, plus Luminaries Among Them Authors: Klay, R Author Full Names: Klay, Robin Source: ECON JOURNAL WATCH, 11 (2):106-119; MAY 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Addresses: Hope Coll, Holland, MI 49422 USA. E-mail Addresses: klay at hope.edu Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INST SPONTANEOUS ORDER ECONOMICS, 9745 KINGS CROWN COURT #102, FAIRFAX, VA 22031 USA ISSN: 1933-527X Web of Science Categories: Economics; ECONOMICS Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AI7UP Unique ID: WOS:000337106000002 Cited References: Waterman A. M. C., 2011, Faith & Economics, V57, P47 Waterman A. M. C., 2014, Correspondence with Robin Klay, Rasmusen Eric B., 2014, Correspondence with Robin Klay, Blinder Alan, 2014, Correspondence with Robin Klay, Islahi Abdul Azim, 2013, 9th International Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance, September 9, Istanbul, 2010, Novak Michael, 1999, First Things, Novak Michael, 1982, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, 2010, The True Wealth of Nations: Catholic Social Thought and Economic Life, Visser H, 2009, ISLAMIC FINANCE: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, P1 Cardiff Christopher F., 2005, CRITICAL REVIEW, V17, P237 Hammarskjold Dag, 1964, Markings, Islahi Abdul Azim, 2014, Correspondence with Robin Klay, Kleiman Ephraim, 2014, Correspondence with Robin Klay, Hart S, 2005, MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, V9, P683 Hassan M. Kabir, 2014, Correspondence with Robin Klay, Schumacher E. F., 1973, Small Is Beautiful: Economics as If People Mattered, ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000336841900031 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Representation of Women as Authors, Reviewers, Editors in Chief, and Editorial Board Members at 6 General Medical Journals in 2010 and 2011 Authors: Erren, TC; Gross, JV; Shaw, DM; Selle, B Author Full Names: Erren, Thomas Christoph; Gross, Juliane Valerie; Shaw, David Martin; Selle, Barbara Source: JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 174 (4):633-+; 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14760 APR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Letter KeyWords Plus: 35-YEAR PERSPECTIVE Addresses: [Erren, Thomas Christoph; Gross, Juliane Valerie] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst & Policlin Occupat Med Environm Med & Preven, D-50938 Cologne, Germany. [Shaw, David Martin] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth, Basel, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: tim.erren at uni-koeln.de Cited Reference Count: 2 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: AMER MEDICAL ASSOC, 330 N WABASH AVE, STE 39300, CHICAGO, IL 60611-5885 USA ISSN: 2168-6106 Web of Science Categories: Medicine, General & Internal Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine IDS Number: AI4NK Unique ID: WOS:000336841900031 Cited References: Jagsi Reshma, 2008, ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V168, P544 Jagsi Reshma, 2006, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V355, P281 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337117100005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Quoting tendencies in Russian and foreign psychological journals Authors: Konnov, VI; Yurevich, MA Author Full Names: Konnov, V. I.; Yurevich, M. A. Source: VOPROSY PSIKHOLOGII, (2):42-+; MAR-APR 2014 Language: Russian Document Type: Article Author Keywords: quoting, psychological journals, scientific schools Abstract: The authors compare quoting tendencies in Russian psychological journals and those published in English on the examples of "Voprosy pshychologii" (VP), "The Psychological Journal" (Pi). "The Psychological Review" (PR), The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) for the years 2010 to 2012. The average number of sources quoted per article, the quotient of the uniqueness of the sources, as well as the number of sources referred to once, more than once and over ten times were calculated for each journal. Comparison of the meanings obtained demonstrates a relatively low average sources index per article and a relatively large proportion of once quoted sources in the national journals. The latter conclusion was made with respect to the subject matter of both VP and PS which is broader than that of the JPSP and more narrow than that of the PR. The authors also analyze lists of the most frequently quoted sources, comparison of which demonstrates a fundamental difference between national and English-language journals. The former mostly quote national classics while the latter mostly refer to articles on issues of methodology and those containing experimental data. The authors attempt to explain the tendency observed by cultural peculiarities of organization of science in Russia. Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA, 39 DIMITROVA UL., MOSCOW, 113095, RUSSIA ISSN: 0042-8841 Web of Science Categories: Psychology, Educational; PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Research Areas: Psychology IDS Number: AI7XU Unique ID: WOS:000337117100005 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000336957600010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Non-Markovian Stochastic Epidemics in Extremely Heterogeneous Populations Authors: House, T Author Full Names: House, T. Source: MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF NATURAL PHENOMENA, 9 (2):153-160; 10.1051/mmnp/20149210 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Zipf, Sellke, SIR KeyWords Plus: TRANSMISSION; NETWORKS; DISEASES Abstract: A feature often observed in epidemiological networks is significant heterogeneity in degree. A popular modelling approach to this has been to consider large populations with highly heterogeneous discrete contact rates. This paper defines an individual-level non-Markovian stochastic process that converges on standard ODE models of such populations in the appropriate asymptotic limit. A generalised Sellke construction is derived fir this model, and this is then used to consider final outcomes in the case where heterogeneity follows a truncated Zipf distribution. Addresses: Univ Warwick, Warwick Math Inst, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England. E-mail Addresses: T.A.House at warwick.ac.uk Funding Acknowledgement: PR Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Funding Text: Work funded by the PR Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. I would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for helpful commets Cited Reference Count: 24 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: EDP SCIENCES S A, 17, AVE DU HOGGAR, PA COURTABOEUF, BP 112, F-91944 LES ULIS CEDEX A, FRANCE ISSN: 0973-5348 Web of Science Categories: Mathematical & Computational Biology; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Multidisciplinary Sciences; MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Research Areas: Mathematical & Computational Biology; Mathematics; Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AI6CO Unique ID: WOS:000336957600010 Cited References: Danon Leon, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, V9, P2826 May RM, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Andersson H., 2000, Stochastic Epidemic Models and Their Statistical Analysis, V151, Schneeberger A, 2004, SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, V31, P380 DIEKMANN O, 1990, JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, V28, P365 KURTZ TG, 1971, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, V8, P344 Anderson R. M., 1991, Infectious Diseases of Humans, Castellano C., 2010, Physical Review Letters, V105, Danon L, 2011, Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis, V2011, Pastor-Satorras R, 2002, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V65, Pastor-Satorras R, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V63, Clauset Aaron, 2009, SIAM REVIEW, V51, P661 Bansal S., 2007, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, V4, P879 House Thomas, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, V469, Berger N., 2005, Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, MAY RM, 1988, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V321, P565 Diekmann O., 2000, Mathematical Epidemiology of Infective Diseases: Model Building, Analysis and Interpretation, Eubank S., 2004, Nature, V429, P180 Grimmett G. R., 2001, Probability and Random Processes, Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 KURTZ TG, 1970, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, V7, P49 Kiss Istvan Z., 2006, MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, V203, P124 Keeling M.J., 2007, Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals, Durrett R., 2007, Random Graph Dynamics, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337656700020 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Comparative literature study between investigations in foreign Science Citation *Index* journals and Chinese core domestic journals in the treatment of low back pain with acupuncture Authors: Lin, XJ; Li, R Author Full Names: Lin, Xiangjun; Li, Rui Source: JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 34 (3):373-380; JUN 15 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Low back pain, Journal impact factor, Comparative research KeyWords Plus: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; METAANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS; NECK Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality and methods of clinical research literature published in foreign Science Citation Index (SCI) journals studying the treatment of low back pain with acupuncture. To conduct a comparative study with clinical research literature published in Chinese core domestic journals, and to understand the prospects of current research trends of acupuncture clinical studies in Western countries and China. METHODS: Studies on clinical acupuncture treatment of low back pain in English SCI journals and four Chinese core domestic journals dated from 2002 to 2012 were sourced and summarized for this study. Objective analysis and evaluation on the differences in subject and scope of study on low back pain by foreign and Chinese researchers were conducted. RESULTS: Forty-seven English studies and 115 Chinese studies met our inclusion criteria. A keyword search revealed different kinds of low back pain related conditions in English and Chinese studies. The English studies were broad in scope, while the Chinese studies were more focused. There were also differences in the understanding and definition of concepts and study orientation. CONCLUSION: More study should be undertaken to understand the contradictions that acupuncture faces in view of modern research to further advance the field. (C) 2014 JTCM. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Lin, Xiangjun; Li, Rui] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Acupuncture & Tuina, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: lirui_bucm at 126.com Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: JOURNAL TRADITIONAL CHINESE MED, 16 NANXIAOJIE, DONGZHIMEN NEI, BEIJING, 100700, PEOPLES R CHINA ISSN: 0255-2922 eISSN: 1577-7014 IDS Number: AJ4OW Unique ID: WOS:000337656700020 Cited References: Smith LA, 2000, PAIN, V86, P119 Han Ji-Sheng, 2011, NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, V35, P680 Waddell G., 1999, The Back Pain Revolution, P234 Ernst E, 1998, ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V158, P2235 Chou Roger, 2008, Annals of internal medicine, V148, P247 TERRIET G, 1990, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V43, P1191 Zhu FX., 2003, Diseases and disorders that can be treated with acupuncture. Acupuncture: review and analysis of reports on controlled clinical trials, P23 DEYO RA, 1993, SPINE, V18, P2153 Brinkhaus B, 2006, Focus Altern Complement Ther, V11, P286 MATHEW B, 1988, SPINE, V13, P168 Tulder MWv, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V3, Jenkins Hazel, 2002, Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia, V10, P91 Pan YT, 2010, Chinese S&T journal citation reports, P79 White AR, 1999, RHEUMATOLOGY, V38, P143 Park Jongbae, 2008, JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEAnnual Conference of the Society-for-Acupuncture-Research, NOV 09-11, 2007, Baltimore, MD, V14, P871 Dincer F, 2003, COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, V11, P235 Government HM, 2001, Government response to the house of lords select committee on science and technology's report on complementary and alternative medicine, P323 Ahn AC, 2005, ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, V11, P40 Ezzo J, 2000, PAIN, V86, P217 MCCOWIN PR, 1991, ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, V22, P315 vanTulder MW, 1997, SPINE, V22, P427 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337572600001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Editorial Essay: Why Do We Still Have Journals? Authors: Davis, GF Author Full Names: Davis, Gerald F. Source: ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 59 (2):193-201; 10.1177/0001839214534186 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: scholarly journals, review process, open access, impact factor, online publishing, philosophy of science Abstract: The Web has greatly reduced the barriers to entry for new journals and other platforms for communicating scientific output, and the number of journals continues to multiply. This leaves readers and authors with the daunting cognitive challenge of navigating the literature and discerning contributions that are both relevant and significant. Meanwhile, measures of journal impact that might guide the use of the literature have become more visible and consequential, leading to "impact gamesmanship" that renders the measures increasingly suspect. The incentive system created by our journals is broken. In this essay, I argue that the core technology of journals is not their distribution but their review process. The organization of the review process reflects assumptions about what a contribution is and how it should be evaluated. Through their review processes, journals can certify contributions, convene scholarly communities, and curate works that are worth reading. Different review processes thereby create incentives for different kinds of work. It's time for a broader dialogue about how we connect the aims of the social science enterprise to our system of journals. Addresses: Univ Michigan, Stephen M Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA. E-mail Addresses: gfdavis at umich.edu Cited Reference Count: 12 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA ISSN: 0001-8392 eISSN: 1930-3815 IDS Number: AJ3NE Unique ID: WOS:000337572600001 Cited References: Arnold D. N., 2011, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, V58, P434 Labbe C., 2010, Universite Joseph Fourier technical report, Van Noorden R., 2014, Nature, Van Noorden Richard, 2011, NATURE, V478, P26 Van Noorden Richard, 2013, NATURE, V500, P510 Schekman R., 2013, The Guardian, Perrow C., 1985, Publishing in the Organizational Sciences, P220 Miguel E., 2014, SCIENCE, V343, P30 [Anonymous], 2013, The Economist, Lin T., 2012, New York Times, Delgado Lopez-Cozar E., 2012, arXiv: 1212. 0638v2, Bhattacharjee Y., 2013, New York Times Magazine, ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337656700020 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Comparative literature study between investigations in foreign Science Citation Index journals and Chinese core domestic journals in the treatment of low back pain with acupuncture Authors: Lin, XJ; Li, R Author Full Names: Lin, Xiangjun; Li, Rui Source: JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 34 (3):373-380; JUN 15 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Low back pain, Journal impact factor, Comparative research KeyWords Plus: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; METAANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS; NECK Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality and methods of clinical research literature published in foreign Science Citation Index (SCI) journals studying the treatment of low back pain with acupuncture. To conduct a comparative study with clinical research literature published in Chinese core domestic journals, and to understand the prospects of current research trends of acupuncture clinical studies in Western countries and China. METHODS: Studies on clinical acupuncture treatment of low back pain in English SCI journals and four Chinese core domestic journals dated from 2002 to 2012 were sourced and summarized for this study. Objective analysis and evaluation on the differences in subject and scope of study on low back pain by foreign and Chinese researchers were conducted. RESULTS: Forty-seven English studies and 115 Chinese studies met our inclusion criteria. A keyword search revealed different kinds of low back pain related conditions in English and Chinese studies. The English studies were broad in scope, while the Chinese studies were more focused. There were also differences in the understanding and definition of concepts and study orientation. CONCLUSION: More study should be undertaken to understand the contradictions that acupuncture faces in view of modern research to further advance the field. (C) 2014 JTCM. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Lin, Xiangjun; Li, Rui] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Acupuncture & Tuina, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: lirui_bucm at 126.com Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: JOURNAL TRADITIONAL CHINESE MED, 16 NANXIAOJIE, DONGZHIMEN NEI, BEIJING, 100700, PEOPLES R CHINA ISSN: 0255-2922 eISSN: 1577-7014 IDS Number: AJ4OW Unique ID: WOS:000337656700020 Cited References: Smith LA, 2000, PAIN, V86, P119 Han Ji-Sheng, 2011, NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, V35, P680 Waddell G., 1999, The Back Pain Revolution, P234 Ernst E, 1998, ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V158, P2235 Chou Roger, 2008, Annals of internal medicine, V148, P247 TERRIET G, 1990, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V43, P1191 Zhu FX., 2003, Diseases and disorders that can be treated with acupuncture. Acupuncture: review and analysis of reports on controlled clinical trials, P23 DEYO RA, 1993, SPINE, V18, P2153 Brinkhaus B, 2006, Focus Altern Complement Ther, V11, P286 MATHEW B, 1988, SPINE, V13, P168 Tulder MWv, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V3, Jenkins Hazel, 2002, Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia, V10, P91 Pan YT, 2010, Chinese S&T journal citation reports, P79 White AR, 1999, RHEUMATOLOGY, V38, P143 Park Jongbae, 2008, JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEAnnual Conference of the Society-for-Acupuncture-Research, NOV 09-11, 2007, Baltimore, MD, V14, P871 Dincer F, 2003, COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, V11, P235 Government HM, 2001, Government response to the house of lords select committee on science and technology's report on complementary and alternative medicine, P323 Ahn AC, 2005, ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, V11, P40 Ezzo J, 2000, PAIN, V86, P217 MCCOWIN PR, 1991, ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, V22, P315 vanTulder MW, 1997, SPINE, V22, P427 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337493300082 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: HANDBOOK OF WOMEN BIBLICAL INTERPRETERS: A HISTORICAL AND BIBLIOGRAPHICAL GUIDE. Authors: Miller, A Author Full Names: Miller, Aubrey Source: RELIGIOUS STUDIES REVIEW, 40 (2):101-101; 10.1111/rsr.12131_3 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Book Review Addresses: [Miller, Aubrey] Fuller Theol Seminary, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA. Cited Reference Count: 1 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0319-485X eISSN: 1748-0922 IDS Number: AJ2NP Unique ID: WOS:000337493300082 Cited References: TAYLOR MA, 2012, HDB WOMEN BIBLICAL I, ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *Record 19 of 26. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337303900005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing Authors: Lee, I Author Full Names: Lee, Icy Source: LANGUAGE TEACHING, 47 (2):250-261; 10.1017/S0261444811000504 APR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Abstract: While writing for scholarly publications is considered a crucial dimension of academic work, the 'publish-or-perish' system in our field has increasingly caused anxiety and induced stress among not only young academics but also more established scholars. Using my own publishing experience as a point of departure, I challenge the assumption that knowledge contribution should be solely or mainly gauged on the basis of the venue of publications. By comparing the perspectives of twelve Asia-based scholars based on data collected from email interviews, I propose that 'scholarliness' should be defined by knowledge dissemination and advancement in our field, rather than indexes or journal impact factors. Using the game metaphor, I conclude by offering some tips to survive 'publish or perish'. Addresses: Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: icylee at cuhk.edu.hk Cited Reference Count: 14 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND ISSN: 0261-4448 eISSN: 1475-3049 IDS Number: AI9YK Unique ID: WOS:000337303900005 Cited References: Togia A., 2006, International Journal of Educational Research, V45, P362 Sweeney A.E., 2001, Educational Media International, V38, Braimoh D., 2005, US-China Education Review, V2.9, P5 Leydesdorff Loet, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V59, P278 Min H.-T., 2011, Symposium on Second Language Writing, 9-11 June, 2011, Taiwan, Sullivan S., 1996, Australian Academic and Research Libraries, V27.1, P40 Brandon J. M., 1996, Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, 23-26 November, 1996, San Diego, Bence V., 2005, Journal of Educational Administration and History, V37.2, P137 Hobbs G., 2001, Journal of Education for Teaching, V27.3, P215 Lucas L., 2008, Higher Education policy, V21, P83 Klein Daniel B., 2004, ECON JOURNAL WATCH, V1, P134 McGrail M. R., 2006, Higher Education Research and Development, V25.1, P19 Kwan S. C. K., 2010, Higher Education, V59, P55 Varian H. R., 1997, Scholarly Communication and Technology Conference, April, 1997, Atlanta, GA, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337032400035 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Forgotten founder of bibliometrics Authors: Rousseau, R Author Full Names: Rousseau, Ronald Source: NATURE, 510 (7504):218-218; JUN 12 2014 Language: English Document Type: Letter Addresses: Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. E-mail Addresses: ronald.rousseau at kuleuven.be Cited Reference Count: 1 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, MACMILLAN BUILDING, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND ISSN: 0028-0836 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences; MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AI7AT Unique ID: WOS:000337032400035 Cited References: Ball Philip, 2014, NATURE, V509, P425 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337079200001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective Authors: Barth, A; Marx, W; Bornmann, L; Mutz, R Author Full Names: Barth, A.; Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R. Source: EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 129 (6):10.1140/epjp/i2014-14111-6 JUN 6 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: WEAK INTERACTIONS; MASSLESS PARTICLES; BROKEN SYMMETRIES; GAUGE FIELDS; MODEL; SUPERSYMMETRY; REGRESSION; RADIATION; PHYSICS Abstract: The subject of our present paper is the analysis of the origins or historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective, using a segmented regression analysis in combination with a method named reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS). Our analysis is based on the references cited in the Higgs boson publications published since 1974. The objective of our analysis consists of identifying specific individual publications in the Higgs boson research context to which the scientific community frequently had referred to. We are interested in seminal works which contributed to a high extent to the discovery of the Higgs boson. Our results show that researchers in the Higgs boson field preferably refer to more recently published papers - particularly papers published since the beginning of the sixties. For example, our analysis reveals seven major contributions which appeared within the sixties: Englert and Brout (1964), Higgs (1964, 2 papers), and Guralnik et al. (1964) on the Higgs mechanism as well as Glashow (1961), Weinberg (1967), and Salam (1968) on the unification of weak and electromagnetic interaction. Even if the Nobel Prize award highlights the outstanding importance of the work of Peter Higgs and Francois Englert, bibliometrics offer the additional possibility of getting hints to other publications in this research field (especially to historical publications), which are of vital importance from the expert point of view. Addresses: [Barth, A.] FIZ Karlsruhe, D-76344 Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany. [Marx, W.] Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany. [Bornmann, L.] Max Planck Gesell, Div Sci & Innovat Studies, D-80539 Munich, Germany. [Mutz, R.] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: andreas.barth at fiz-karlsruhe.de; w.marx at fkf.mpg.de; bornmann at gv.mpg.de; ruediger.mutz at gess.ethz.ch Cited Reference Count: 43 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY ISSN: 2190-5444 Article Number: 111 Web of Science Categories: Physics, Multidisciplinary; PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Research Areas: Physics IDS Number: AI7NN Unique ID: WOS:000337079200001 Cited References: Williams EJ, 1934, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V45, P0729 Close F., 2011, The Infinity Puzzle. How The Quest to Understand Quantum Field Theory Led to Extraordinary Science, High Politics, and The World's Most Expensive Experiment, Draper N., 1998, Applied Regression, v. Weizsaecker C. F., 1934, ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIK, V88, P612 Shuai XF, 2003, JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, V8, P240 SALAM A, 1964, PHYSICS LETTERS, V13, P168 Marx Werner, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2061 Lederman L., 1993, The God particle: If the universe is the answer, what is the question?, NILLES HP, 1984, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V110, P1 ELLIS J, 1976, NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, V106, P292 SAS Institute Inc, 2011, SAS/STAT 9.3 User's Guide, P5146 WEINBERG S, 1967, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V19, P1264 Marx Werner, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P433 Lerman P.M., 1980, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C (Appl. Stat.), V29, P77 GOLDSTONE J, 1961, NUOVO CIMENTO, V19, P154 Cho Adrian, 2012, SCIENCE, V338, P1524 LANDAU LD, 1948, DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, V60, P207 Bornmann Lutz, 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P84 ENGLERT F, 1964, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V13, P321 ANDERSON PW, 1963, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V130, P439 van Raan AFJ, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P347 Salam A., 1968, Elementary particle theory, relativistic groups and analyticityElementary particle theory, relativistic groups and analyticity, 19-25 May 1968, Lerum, Sweden, Bleck-Neuhaus J., 2013, Elementare Teilchen: Von den Atomen uber das Standard-Modell bis zum Higgs-Boson, [Anonymous], 1979, Nobel Lecture, The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979, KIBBLE TWB, 1967, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V155, P1554 Sauter UH, 1999, WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, V31, P416 Brusilovskiy E., 2004, Proceedings of the 17th Conference of North Eastern SAS User Group (NESUG) in Baltimore, HABER HE, 1985, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V117, P75 McCain Katherine W., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P2129 HIGGS PW, 1964, PHYSICS LETTERS, V12, P132 Bloch F, 1937, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V52, P54 NAMBU Y, 1961, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V122, P345 MCGEE VE, 1970, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, V65, P1109 LEE BW, 1977, PHYSICAL REVIEW D, V16, P1519 HIGGS PW, 1964, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V13, P508 Marx Werner, 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P751 GUNION JF, 1986, NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, V272, P1 GURALNIK GS, 1964, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V13, P585 HIGGS PW, 1966, PHYSICAL REVIEW, V145, P1156 GLASHOW SL, 1961, NUCLEAR PHYSICS, V22, P579 White H.D., 1998, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., V49, P327 Bornmann Luti, 2008, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V64, P45 THOOFT G, 1972, NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, VB-44, P189 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000336873000004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical articles in Information Systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes Authors: Kwan, BSC; Chan, H Author Full Names: Kwan, Becky Siu Chu; Chan, Hang Source: JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 14 29-47; 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.004 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citation roles, Moves, Results and Discussion sections, Information Systems, Research articles, Citations KeyWords Plus: APPLIED LINGUISTICS; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; BIOCHEMISTRY; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of how behavioral science researchers from the soft domain of Information Systems (IS) engage prior knowledge of the field to construct research claims in journal articles. Data was drawn from the Results and the Discussion sections of 40 IS research articles published in one research journal (MIS Quarterly, N = 20) and one applied-research journal (Information Management, N = 20). To perform the analysis, the Results and the Discussion sections of the articles were first parsed into moves, and citations in each of the moves were classified according to their rhetorical functions and the types of knowledge cited (semantic content). Based on the classification, a functional-semantic citation typology was developed. Counts of the citations in each category represented in the typology were then subjected to a series of statistical analyses to examine their distribution across the two journals as well as the two target sections. The results reveal that while all the citation categories in the typology were present in both journals, they appeared only sparingly in the IM articles, and cross-sectional differences in their distribution were statistically significant in the MIS Quarterly corpus only. Pedagogical implications will be presented. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Kwan, Becky Siu Chu] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept English, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China. [Chan, Hang] Univ Cambridge, Old Sch, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England. E-mail Addresses: enbkwan at cityu.edu.hk; hc329 at cam.ac.uk Cited Reference Count: 58 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 1475-1585 Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research; Linguistics; Language & Linguistics; EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; LINGUISTICS Research Areas: Education & Educational Research; Linguistics IDS Number: AI4YQ Unique ID: WOS:000336873000004 Cited References: Bagozzi Richard P., 2011, MIS QUARTERLY, V35, P261 MIS Quarterly, 2010, Manuscript guidelines, Williams I. A., 1999, English for Specific Purposes, V18, P347 MacKenzie Scott B., 2011, MIS QUARTERLY, V35, P293 MIS Quarterly, 2010, About MIS Quarterly, Parry O., 1994, Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences: Processes and products, P34 PERITZ BC, 1983, SCIENTOMETRICS, V5, P303 Myers G., 1990, Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge, SMALL HG, 1978, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V8, P327 Ridley D., 2008, The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students, Hyland K., 2000, Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing, Kanoksilapatham B, 2005, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V24, P269 Swales J. M., 2004, Research genres: Exploration and applications, Hopkins A., 1988, English Specif. Purposes, V7, P113 Harwood Nigel, 2009, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V41, P497 Prelli U., 1989, A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse, Swales John, 1990, Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, GILBERT GN, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P113 Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Thompson P., 1998, Proceedings for the teaching and language corpora 98 conference, Oxford, P177 Hevner AR, 2004, MIS QUARTERLY, V28, P75 THOMPSON DK, 1993, WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, V10, P106 Ravetz J. R., 1971, Scientific knowledge and its social problems, Holmes R., 1997, English for Specific Purposes, V16, P321 Bitchener J., 2006, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V5, P4 Yang Y., 2003, English for Specific Purposes, V22, P365 Information and Management, 2010, Guide for authors, Small Henry, 1982, Progress in Communication Sciences, V3, P287310 Bunton D., 1998, Linguistic and textual problems in Ph. D. and M. Phil theses: An analysis of genre moves and metatext, Bollen Kenneth A., 2011, MIS QUARTERLY, V35, P359 Gilbert G.N., 1984, Opening Pandora's Box, Weissberg R., 1990, Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English, Becher Tony, 2001, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines, White HD, 2004, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V25, P89 MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V5, P86 Information and Management, 2010, The International Journal of Information Systems Applications, SWALES J, 1986, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V7, P39 Swales J. M., 2004, Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, Hyland K, 1999, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V20, P341 Brett P, 1994, English for Specific Purposes, V13, P47 Lim Jason Miin Hwa, 2006, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V25, P282 Peacock M., 2002, System, V30, P479 CRONIN B, 1994, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V45, P537 Westin S., 1994, Information Resources Management Journal, V7, Lim Jason Miin-Hwa, 2010, JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, V9, P280 Swales J. M., 1981, Aspects of article introductions, Kamler B., 2006, Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision, Lewin B. A., 2001, Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts, Basturkmen H, 2009, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V8, P241 Nwogu KN, 1997, English for Specific Purposes, V16, P119 Berkenkotter C., 1995, Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication, Bhatia V. K., 2001, Academic writing in context: Implications and applications (Paper in honour of Tony Dudley-Evans), P79 Pecorari D., 2008, Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis, Lin Ling, 2012, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V31, P150 THOMPSON G, 1991, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V12, P365 Kwan BSC, 2006, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V25, P30 Buckingham J., 1997, ARAL, V20, P51 GILBERT GN, 1976, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V6, P281 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000336873000003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles Authors: Hu, GW; Wang, GH Author Full Names: Hu, Guangwei; Wang, Guihua Source: JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 14 14-28; 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Academic writing, Citation, Writer stance, Author/textual integration, Disciplinary influences, Ethnolinguistic influences KeyWords Plus: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; REPORTING CLAUSES; SOFT PSYCHOLOGY; CONSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE; ENGLISH; THESES; TEXTS Abstract: Citation, as an integral part of academic discourse and a signature feature of scholarly publication, has attracted much research attention. Previous research, however, has focused on several aspects of citation practices in a largely discrete fashion and addressed disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in isolation from each other. This article reports on a study designed to investigate cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic variations of multiple citation features from the unifying perspective of Bakhtinian dialogism. The dataset consisted of 84 research articles sampled from 12 leading Chinese- and English-medium journals of applied linguistics and general medicine. All the citations in the corpus were identified and examined in an integrative analytic framework that characterized multiple aspects of citations in terms of dialogic contraction (i.e., closing down the space for alternative views) or dialogic expansion (i.e., opening up the space for alternative voices). Quantitative and textual analyses revealed marked cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic differences in the level and type of citation-based dialogic engagement. These differences are interpreted in reference to the nature of cited information, epistemologies underlying cultural and disciplinary practices, ethnolinguistic norms of communication, and culturally valued interpersonal relationships. Pedagogical implications derived from these findings are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Hu, Guangwei] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 637616, Singapore. [Wang, Guihua] China West Normal Univ, Foreign Language Sch, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: guangwei.hu at nie.edu.sg Cited Reference Count: 75 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 1475-1585 Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research; Linguistics; Language & Linguistics; EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; LINGUISTICS Research Areas: Education & Educational Research; Linguistics IDS Number: AI4YQ Unique ID: WOS:000336873000003 Cited References: Bazerman C., 2005, Reference guide to writing across the curriculum, Coffin C., 2009, Writing & Pedagogy, V1, P163 Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Soler-Monreal C., 2011, International Journal of English Studies, V11, P53 Nisbett R. E., 2003, The geography of thought, Baert P., 2009, The new Blackwell companion to social theory, P60 Hua S., 1995, Scientism and humanism: Two cultures in post-Mao China, 1979-1989, White MD, 1997, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V67, P122 Mansourizadeh Kobra, 2011, JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, V10, P152 Confucius, 1983, The analects, Woolgar Steve, 1986, Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, Charles Maggie, 2006, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V27, P492 Hu Guangwei, 2011, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V43, P2795 Hyland K., 2002, Academic discourse, P115 Chan W.-T., 1963, A source book in Chinese philosophy, Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, Harwood Nigel, 2009, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V41, P497 White Peter, 2003, Text, V23, P259 Small Henry, 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P185 DUENAS PM, 2009, CROSS LINGUISTIC CRO, V193, P49 Swales John, 1990, Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Flottum K., 2006, Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines, Needham J., 2004, Science and civilization in China: General conclusions and reflections, V7, Latour Bruno, 1987, Science In Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Zhang W., 2007, Journal of Hubei University, V34, P83 Thompson P., 2005, Strategies in academic discourse, P31 Bodde B., 1991, Chinese thought, society, and science: The intellectual and social background of science and technology in pre-modern China, Peng KP, 1999, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V54, P741 Thompson P., 2001, Lang. Learn. Technol., V5, P91 Jalilifar A., 2012, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, V22, P23 Bloch J., 1995, Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy, P231 GILBERT GN, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P113 Thompson G., 1991, Applied Linguistics, V12, P305 Smith LD, 2002, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST107th Annual Convention of the American-Psychological-Association, AUG 19-24, 1999, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, V57, P749 Petrie B., 2007, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V6, P238 Tsay MY, 1998, BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V86, P31 Hawes T, 1997, RESEARCH IN THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH, V31, P393 Manion L., 2007, Research methods in education, Tweed RG, 2002, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V57, P89 White HD, 2004, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V25, P89 Becher Tony, 2001, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines, Halliday M. A. K., 1993, Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, Bazerman Charles, 1988, Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, American Board of Internal Medicine, About ABIM, Davidse Kristin, 2011, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V43, P236 Atkinson D., 2004, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V3, P277 MEEHL PE, 1978, JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V46, P806 Hyland K, 1999, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V20, P341 Charles Maggie, 2006, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V25, P310 Bondi Marina, 2009, ACADEMIC EVALUATION - REVIEW GENRES IN UNIVERSITY SETTINGS, P179 Fairclough N., 1992, Discourse and social change, ISI Web of Science, 2011, Journal citation reports: Science edition, Lustig M. W., 2010, Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures, Pakulski J., 2009, The new Blackwell companion to social theory, P251 Institute of Computing Technology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011, ICTCIAS (Version 2011), Paul D, 2000, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, V14, P185 Thompson P., 2005, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V4, P307 Graddol David, 2006, English Next. Why global English may mean the end of `English as a Foreign Language, O'Donnell M., 2011, UAM COrpusTool (Version 2.8.7), Auyang S. Y., Scientific convergence in the birth of molecular biology, Bloch J., 2010, Journal of Writing Research, V2, P219 Connor U. M., 2005, Directions in applied linguistics: Essays in honor of Robert B. Kaplan, P153 Berkenkotter C., 1995, Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication, Habermas J., 1971, Knowledge and human interests, Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, 2011, Chinese science and technology journal citation reports, Shi L, 2003, CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, V59, P369 Salager-Meyer F., 1999, English for Specific Purposes, V18, P279 Bakhtin Mikhail M., 1981, The dialogic imagination, Wang L., 1985, Zhongguo xiandai yufaModern Chinese grammar, Hyland Ken, 2013, LANGUAGE TEACHING, V46, P53 Martin J. R., 2005, The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English, Hyland K., 2000, Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing, Milojevic Stasa, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Pecorari D, 2006, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V25, P4 TAYLOR G, 1991, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V12, P319 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000336945900018 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: HE TOUR OF THE CITATION Authors: Hangouet, JF Author Full Names: Hangouet, Jean-Francois Source: EUROPE-REVUE LITTERAIRE MENSUELLE, (1022):171-182; JUN-JUL 2014 Language: French Document Type: Article Cited Reference Count: 28 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: REVUE EUROPE, 4 RUE MARIE-ROSE, 75014 PARIS, FRANCE ISSN: 0014-2751 Web of Science Categories: Literary Reviews Research Areas: Literature IDS Number: AI5YC Unique ID: WOS:000336945900018 Cited References: [Anonymous], 1970, Chien blanc, P35 Foucault Michel, 1966, Les Mots et les Choses, P398 Gary Romain, 1974, La nuit sera calme, P69 Gary Romain, 1973, Les Enchanteurs, P20 Buchez Philippe-Joseph-Benjamin, 1833, Introduction a la Science de l'Histoire, ou Science du developpement de l'Humanite, P116 Gary Romain, 2007, Tulipe ou la protestation, P25 1985, Sepher ha-Zohar, Le Livre de la Splendeur, VIII, P97 Camus Albert, 1950, Actuelles.Ecrits politiques, P119 Michaux Henri, 1998, &UOELIG;uvivs completes, VI, P787 Gary Romain, 1952, Les Couleurs du jour, P95 De Quincey Thomas, 1932, Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, P45 Renan Ernest, 1871, La Reforme intellectuelle et morale de la France, P156 Gorki Maxime, 1938, La Culture et le Peuple, P86 Gary Romain, 1965, Pour Sganarelle, P277 Starobinski Jean, 1943, Lettres, P48 Gary Romain, 1960, La Promesse de l'aube, P119 Cocteau Jean, 2000, Le Potomak, P58 Grey Romain, 1946, Tulipe, P9 Gary Romain, 1961, Johnnie C&OELIG;ur, P62 Gary Romain, 1946, L'Age d'Or, P14 2005, L'Affaire Homme, P337 Gary Romain, 1963, Lady L, P181 Gary Romain, 1970, Le Nouvel Observateur, P6 Gary Romain, 1977, Clair de femme, P114 Gary Romain, 1961, Education europeenne, P282 Renan Ernest, 1995, L'Avenir de la Science, [1848-1890], P265 Gary Romain, 1977, Charge d'ame, P227 [Anonymous], 1979, VSD, P23 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337114900017 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Brown over Black: Race and the Politics of Postcolonial Citation Authors: Menon, DM Author Full Names: Menon, Dilip M. Source: RADICAL HISTORY REVIEW, (119):241-245; SPR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Book Review Addresses: [Menon, Dilip M.] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Indian Studies Africa, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa. Cited Reference Count: 3 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: DUKE UNIV PRESS, 905 W MAIN ST, STE 18-B, DURHAM, NC 27701 USA ISSN: 0163-6545 Web of Science Categories: History Research Areas: History IDS Number: AI7WY Unique ID: WOS:000337114900017 Cited References: BURTON A, 2012, BROWN BLACK RACE POL, Westad Orme, 2008, London Review of Books, P30 Meaney Thomas, 2013, Nation, ======================================================================== *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles Authors: Hu, GW; Wang, GH Author Full Names: Hu, Guangwei; Wang, Guihua Source: JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 14 14-28; 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Academic writing, Citation, Writer stance, Author/textual integration, Disciplinary influences, Ethnolinguistic influences KeyWords Plus: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; REPORTING CLAUSES; SOFT PSYCHOLOGY; CONSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE; ENGLISH; THESES; TEXTS Abstract: Citation, as an integral part of academic discourse and a signature feature of scholarly publication, has attracted much research attention. Previous research, however, has focused on several aspects of citation practices in a largely discrete fashion and addressed disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in isolation from each other. This article reports on a study designed to investigate cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic variations of multiple citation features from the unifying perspective of Bakhtinian dialogism. The dataset consisted of 84 research articles sampled from 12 leading Chinese- and English-medium journals of applied linguistics and general medicine. All the citations in the corpus were identified and examined in an integrative analytic framework that characterized multiple aspects of citations in terms of dialogic contraction (i.e., closing down the space for alternative views) or dialogic expansion (i.e., opening up the space for alternative voices). Quantitative and textual analyses revealed marked cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic differences in the level and type of citation-based dialogic engagement. These differences are interpreted in reference to the nature of cited information, epistemologies underlying cultural and disciplinary practices, ethnolinguistic norms of communication, and culturally valued interpersonal relationships. Pedagogical implications derived from these findings are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Hu, Guangwei] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 637616, Singapore. [Wang, Guihua] China West Normal Univ, Foreign Language Sch, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: guangwei.hu at nie.edu.sg Cited Reference Count: 75 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 1475-1585 Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research; Linguistics; Language & Linguistics; EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; LINGUISTICS Research Areas: Education & Educational Research; Linguistics IDS Number: AI4YQ Unique ID: WOS:000336873000003 Cited References: Bazerman C., 2005, Reference guide to writing across the curriculum, Coffin C., 2009, Writing & Pedagogy, V1, P163 Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Soler-Monreal C., 2011, International Journal of English Studies, V11, P53 Nisbett R. E., 2003, The geography of thought, Baert P., 2009, The new Blackwell companion to social theory, P60 Hua S., 1995, Scientism and humanism: Two cultures in post-Mao China, 1979-1989, White MD, 1997, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V67, P122 Mansourizadeh Kobra, 2011, JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, V10, P152 Confucius, 1983, The analects, Woolgar Steve, 1986, Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, Charles Maggie, 2006, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V27, P492 Hu Guangwei, 2011, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V43, P2795 Hyland K., 2002, Academic discourse, P115 Chan W.-T., 1963, A source book in Chinese philosophy, Moed H. F., 2005, Citation analysis in research evaluation, Harwood Nigel, 2009, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V41, P497 White Peter, 2003, Text, V23, P259 Small Henry, 2010, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V19, P185 DUENAS PM, 2009, CROSS LINGUISTIC CRO, V193, P49 Swales John, 1990, Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Flottum K., 2006, Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines, Needham J., 2004, Science and civilization in China: General conclusions and reflections, V7, Latour Bruno, 1987, Science In Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Zhang W., 2007, Journal of Hubei University, V34, P83 Thompson P., 2005, Strategies in academic discourse, P31 Bodde B., 1991, Chinese thought, society, and science: The intellectual and social background of science and technology in pre-modern China, Peng KP, 1999, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V54, P741 Thompson P., 2001, Lang. Learn. Technol., V5, P91 Jalilifar A., 2012, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, V22, P23 Bloch J., 1995, Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy, P231 GILBERT GN, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P113 Thompson G., 1991, Applied Linguistics, V12, P305 Smith LD, 2002, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST107th Annual Convention of the American-Psychological-Association, AUG 19-24, 1999, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, V57, P749 Petrie B., 2007, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V6, P238 Tsay MY, 1998, BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V86, P31 Hawes T, 1997, RESEARCH IN THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH, V31, P393 Manion L., 2007, Research methods in education, Tweed RG, 2002, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V57, P89 White HD, 2004, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V25, P89 Becher Tony, 2001, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines, Halliday M. A. K., 1993, Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, Bazerman Charles, 1988, Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, American Board of Internal Medicine, About ABIM, Davidse Kristin, 2011, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, V43, P236 Atkinson D., 2004, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V3, P277 MEEHL PE, 1978, JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, V46, P806 Hyland K, 1999, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V20, P341 Charles Maggie, 2006, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V25, P310 Bondi Marina, 2009, ACADEMIC EVALUATION - REVIEW GENRES IN UNIVERSITY SETTINGS, P179 Fairclough N., 1992, Discourse and social change, ISI Web of Science, 2011, Journal citation reports: Science edition, Lustig M. W., 2010, Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures, Pakulski J., 2009, The new Blackwell companion to social theory, P251 Institute of Computing Technology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011, ICTCIAS (Version 2011), Paul D, 2000, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, V14, P185 Thompson P., 2005, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V4, P307 Graddol David, 2006, English Next. Why global English may mean the end of `English as a Foreign Language, O'Donnell M., 2011, UAM COrpusTool (Version 2.8.7), Auyang S. Y., Scientific convergence in the birth of molecular biology, Bloch J., 2010, Journal of Writing Research, V2, P219 Connor U. M., 2005, Directions in applied linguistics: Essays in honor of Robert B. Kaplan, P153 Berkenkotter C., 1995, Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication, Habermas J., 1971, Knowledge and human interests, Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, 2011, Chinese science and technology journal citation reports, Shi L, 2003, CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, V59, P369 Salager-Meyer F., 1999, English for Specific Purposes, V18, P279 Bakhtin Mikhail M., 1981, The dialogic imagination, Wang L., 1985, Zhongguo xiandai yufaModern Chinese grammar, Hyland Ken, 2013, LANGUAGE TEACHING, V46, P53 Martin J. R., 2005, The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English, Hyland K., 2000, Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing, Milojevic Stasa, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Pecorari D, 2006, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V25, P4 TAYLOR G, 1991, APPLIED LINGUISTICS, V12, P319 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Brown over Black: Race and the Politics of Postcolonial Citation Authors: Menon, DM Author Full Names: Menon, Dilip M. Source: RADICAL HISTORY REVIEW, (119):241-245; SPR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Book Review Addresses: [Menon, Dilip M.] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Indian Studies Africa, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa. Cited Reference Count: 3 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: DUKE UNIV PRESS, 905 W MAIN ST, STE 18-B, DURHAM, NC 27701 USA ISSN: 0163-6545 Web of Science Categories: History Research Areas: History IDS Number: AI7WY Unique ID: WOS:000337114900017 Cited References: BURTON A, 2012, BROWN BLACK RACE POL, Westad Orme, 2008, London Review of Books, P30 Meaney Thomas, 2013, Nation, ============================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300013 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Extending citer analysis *to* journal impact evaluation Authors: Lu, K; Ajiferuke, I; Wolfram, D Author Full Names: Lu, Kun; Ajiferuke, Isola; Wolfram, Dietmar Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):245-260; 10.1007/s11192-014-1274-y JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CITATION ANALYSIS; METRICS Abstract: The concept of citer analysis investigated earlier by Ajiferuke and Wolfram (In: B. Larsen, J. Leta (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI) pp. 798-808, 2009, Scientometrics 83:623-638, 2010) is extended to journals where different citing units (citers, citing articles, citing journals) are compared with the journal *impact factor* and each other to determine if differences in ranking arise from different measures. The citer measures for the 31 high impact journals studied from information science and library science are significantly correlated, even more so than the earlier citer analysis findings, indicating that there is a close relationship among the different units of measure. Still, notable differences in rankings for the journals examined were evident for the different measures used, especially from either 5-year *impact factor* or number of citing articles per publication to the number of citing journals per publication. The journals that are adversely affected seem to be those whose citations are concentrated in a few journals. This informed the need to develop a journal citation concentration index, which can serve as a complementary measure to the existing journal impact indices. Addresses: [Lu, Kun] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Bizzell Lib, Norman, OK 73019 USA. [Ajiferuke, Isola] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada. [Wolfram, Dietmar] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA. E-mail Addresses: iajiferu at uwo.ca Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300013 Cited References: Rousseau R, 2002, LIBRARY TRENDS, V50, P418 Ioannidis John P. A., 2006, PLOS ONE, V1, Pendlebury David A., 2009, ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, V57, P1 Smalheiser N. R., 2009, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, V43, P1 Strotmann A., 2009, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V46, P1 Rousseau Ronald, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P413 Zitt M, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V41, P255 Ajiferuke Isola, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2086 GARFIELD E, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P195 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Archambault Eric, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P635 Bergstrom Carl T., 2008, JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, V28, P11433 Moed Henk F., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P367 DIEKS D, 1976, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V6, P247 MACROBERTS MH, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P342 Franceschini Fiorenzo, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P203 PRATT AD, 1977, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V28, P285 Althouse B. M., 2008, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V60, P27 Ajiferuke Isola, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P623 Glanzel W, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 17, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V53, P171 Gonzalez-Pereira Borja, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P379 Egghe L., 2012, Scientometrics, P1 Ajiferuke Isola, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 212th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 14-17, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, V2, P798 Ajiferuke Isola, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P292 Bollen J, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1419 Vanclay Jerome K., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P211 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337245500013 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The faces of Big Science Authors: Schatz, G Author Full Names: Schatz, Gottfried Source: NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 15 (6):423-426; 10.1038/nrm3807 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review KeyWords Plus: IMPACT FACTOR Abstract: Fifty years ago, academic science was a calling with few regulations or financial rewards. Today, it is a huge enterprise confronted by a plethora of bureaucratic and political controls. This change was not triggered by specific events or decisions but reflects the explosive 'knee' in the exponential growth that science has sustained during the past three-and-a-half centuries. Coming to terms with the demands and benefits of 'Big Science' is a major challenge for today's scientific generation. Since its foundation 50 years ago, the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) has been of invaluable help in meeting this challenge. Addresses: Univ Basel, CH-4153 Reinach, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: gottfried.schatz at unibas.ch Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, MACMILLAN BUILDING, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND ISSN: 1471-0072 Web of Science Categories: Cell Biology; CELL BIOLOGY Research Areas: Cell Biology IDS Number: AI9IE Unique ID: WOS:000337245500013 Cited References: Prinz Florian, 2011, NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, V10, P712 Colhoun HM, 2003, LANCET, V361, P865 Price de Solla D. J., 1963, Little Science, Big Science, Alberts Bruce, 2013, SCIENCE, V340, P787 Kurzweil R., 2005, The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Arrowsmith J., 2011, Nature Rev. Drug Discov., V10, P328 Begley C. Glenn, 2012, NATURE, V483, P531 Perutz MF, 1999, NATURE, V399, P299 Schatz G, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1810 Schatz G, 2002, FEBS LETTERS, V521, P1 Schroter Sara, 2008, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, V101, P507 Grens K, 2013, The Scientist, Nurse Paul, 2014, SCIENCE, V343, P117 Nowotny H, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P753 Kovac Ladislav, 2008, EMBO REPORTS, V9, P703 Ioannidis JPA, 2005, PLOS MEDICINE, V2, P696 Simons Kai, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P165 Schatz G., 1981, Trends Biochem. Sci, V2, P1 Neumann U., 2006, Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter. Festschrift fur Walther Umstatter zum 65. Geburtstag, P49 Sample I., 2013, The Guardian, Larsen Peder Olesen, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P575 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337496800009 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Core *research* areas on addiction in Spain through the Web of Science bibliographic coupling analysis (2000-2013) Authors: Gonzalez-Alcaide, G; Calafat, A; Becona, E Author Full Names: Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio; Calafat, Amador; Becona, Elisardo Source: ADICCIONES, 26 (2):168-183; 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliometrics, addiction, research areas, bibliographic coupling, intellectual structure KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH-FRONT; CITATION; DOCUMENTS; COCITATION; FIELD Abstract: The present study identifies the main Spanish core research areas in the area of addictions through the bibliographic coupling analysis of the publications at the Web of Science under the substance abuse heading. The bibliographic coupling methodology is the analytical procedure that determines the thematic-intellectual proximity of the documents under consideration through the identification of the shared or simultaneously cited bibliography by those documents. A factor analysis and network analysis have been carried out to cluster documents, graphically represent the existing core research areas, and analyse the interrelations between them. We have identified 30 core research areas. Alcohol is the topic of attention of 17 areas and cocaine has a strong presence in 6. Heroin and opiates are only present as prominent substances in 4 areas and cannabis and tobacco in other two for each substance. It has been found that there is a significant degree of fragmentation in the area, with the existence of numerous research foci but with few connections with each other and few documents showing shared common knowledge. Also noteworthy is the large number of emerging research areas, reflecting an incipient stage in many of the research topics. Consideration must be placed in promoting scientific consensus and cohesion of the discipline as well as to encouraging the consolidation of main lines that respond to the social problems and research challenges. Addresses: [Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio] Univ Valencia, Dept Hist Ciencia & Documentac, Valencia 46010, Spain. [Calafat, Amador; Becona, Elisardo] European Inst Studies Prevent IREFREA, Palma De Mallorca, Spain. [Becona, Elisardo] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Psicol Clin & Psicobiol, Santiago De Compostela, Spain. E-mail Addresses: gregorio.gonzalez at uv.es Cited Reference Count: 41 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SOCIDROGALCOHOL, RAMBLA 15, 2A, 3A,, PALMA DE MALLORCA, BALEARES 07003, SPAIN ISSN: 0214-4840 Web of Science Categories: Substance Abuse; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, SCI; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, SSCI Research Areas: Substance Abuse IDS Number: AJ2OI Unique ID: WOS:000337496800009 Cited References: Jarneving B, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P245 Gonz?lez-Alcaide Gregorio, 2007, Adicciones, V19, P45 Aleixandre-Benavent R., 2012, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, V35, P94 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P1721 MacRoberts MH, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P435 Belles A., 2006, Adicciones, V18, P119 Youtie Jan, 2013, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V22, P145 De Granda-Orive J. I., 2009, Gaceta Sanitaria, V23, Yuan Y., 2014, International Journal of Tourism Research, Osca Lluch J., 2012, Revista Espanola de Drogodependencias, V37, P9 Culebras-Fernandez J., 2008, NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, V23, P85 Jarneving B., 2013, Proceedings of the ISSI 2013 Viena. 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 15th to 19th July, 2013, Viena, Austria, P955 Meyer M., 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P473 Jarneving B, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V50, P365 Garcia Lopez J. A., 1999, European Journal of Epidemiology, V15, P23 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Jarneving B., 2007, Journal of Informetrics, V1, P338 Boyack Kevin W., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2389 Small Henry, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P332 Arciniega LT, 1997, ADDICTION, V92, P1639 Jarneving Bo, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P287 Calafat A., 2006, Addiction, V101, P638 Gonzalez-Alcaide G., 2006, Trastornos Adictivos, V8, P78 Gonzalez-Alcaide G., 2008, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Gientifica, V31, P344 Glanzel W, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P195 Czerwon H. J., 1995, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, P167 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Upham S. Phineas, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P15 Castellano-Gomez M., 2003, Adicciones, V15, P309 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V91, P399 Gonzalez Alcaide Gregorio, 2008, Adicciones, V20, P337 Long Janet C., 2012, BMJ OPEN, V2, Arbinaga F., 2002, Adicciones, V14, P139 Boyack Kevin W., 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P670 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 LIU MX, 1993, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V49, P370 Vogel Rick, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, V15, P426 Sanchez-Carbonell X, 2005, ADDICTION, V100, P1166 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P276 Echeburua Enrique, 2010, ADICCIONES, V22, P91 Kuusi Osmo, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P759 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300015 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A quantitative analysis of Antarctic related articles in humanities and social sciences appearing in the world core *journals* Authors: Hua, WN; Li, Y; Yuan, SB Author Full Names: Hua, Weina; Li, Yu; Yuan, Shunbo Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):273-286; 10.1007/s11192-013-1190-6 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Antarctic studies, Bibliometric study, Humanities and social sciences KeyWords Plus: SOUTHERN-OCEAN; TREATY; SEA Abstract: To demonstrate the importance and the actual research situation of Antarctic studies in the humanities and social sciences, we collected data from the SSCI and A&HCI covering a period of over 100 years and focused on the number of articles published each year, major journals, types of document, authors and their countries publishing the most articles, collaboration, the major research subjects covered, and citations. Comparisons were also made with the Arctic studies to show some similarities and differences. The results suggest that the research in the fields of humanities and social sciences has been in the long-run developing without interruption over 100 years. With regard to the number of articles in high-capacity journals, Geographical Journal performs best, followed by the Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen and Scottish Geographical Magazine. The documentation is rather scattered without a strong cohesion, while book review and article are the two most common types of document. There haven't many stable collaborated teams on Antarctic topics. Joyner, Savours, and Beck are the three authors having the highest number of publications. USA is the most active country while the most active research institute is University of Tasmania in Australia. The Antarctic expedition has been the main theme lasted for centuries. In addition, the research in the fields of humanities and social sciences has generated a lot of high-impact articles, among which the article entitled "Chemical concentrations of pollutant lead aerosols, terrestrial dusts and sea salts in Greenland and Antarctic snow strata" enjoys the highest citation counts. Addresses: [Hua, Weina] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. [Li, Yu] Northwest Univ Lib, Xian 710127, Peoples R China. [Yuan, Shunbo] Jiaxing Univ, Sch Business, Dept Informat Management, Jiaxing 314001, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: njuyuan1982 at foxmail.com Funding Acknowledgement: National Social Science Foundation of China [13BTQ043]; Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration [CHINARE2013-04-05-03] Funding Text: This research is funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 13BTQ043) and Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration (Grant No. CHINARE2013-04-05-03). The authors are grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions of anonymous reviewers and the editors, which significantly improved the article. Cited Reference Count: 19 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300015 Cited References: Bruce William S., 1905, SCOTTISH GEOGRAPHICAL MAGAZINE, V21, P322 Kaye SB, 2002, OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, V33, P359 HAMNER WM, 1983, SCIENCE, V220, P433 Bastmeijer K, 2004, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, V98, P763 Naylor Simon, 2008, JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY, V34, P574 Turchetti Simone, 2008, BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE, V41, P417 Osterblom Henrik, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, V21, P972 HAMBRO E, 1974, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, V68, P217 Hamzah B. A., 2010, OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, V41, P186 Dodds Klaus, 2010, GLOBAL POLICY, V1, P108 Tomaselli Keyan G., 2012, CRITICAL ARTS-SOUTH-NORTH CULTURAL AND MEDIA STUDIES, V26, P328 Ikuta Hiroko, 2010, PRAGMATICS, V20, P171 Jones Christopher D., 2011, MARINE POLICY, V35, P732 JOHNSTON TF, 1991, INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF THE AESTHETICS AND SOCIOLOGY OF MUSIC, V22, P47 Rolston H, 2002, ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, V24, P115 MUROZUMI M, 1969, GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, V33, P1247 Stevenson William R., III, 2011, ENDEAVOUR, V35, P160 ANDERSON SS, 1985, ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, V33, P829 Hua Weina, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P703 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The scientific impact and partner selection in collaborative research at Korean universities Authors: Ahn, J; Oh, DH; Lee, JD Author Full Names: Ahn, Jongwuk; Oh, Dong-hyun; Lee, Jeong-Dong Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):173-188; 10.1007/s11192-013-1201-7 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Knowledge production, Scientific collaboration, Multi-university research, Citation impact, Partner selection KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; COAUTHORSHIP; ALLIANCES; NETWORKS; EUROPE; TEAMS Abstract: This study seeks to bridge the gap between *scientometrics* literature on scientific collaboration and science and technology management literature on partner selection by linking scientists' collaborator preferences to the marginal advantage in citation impact. The 1981-2010 South Korea NCR (National Citation Report), a subset of the Web of Science that includes 297,658 scholarly articles, was used for this research. We found that, during this period, multi-author scientific articles increasingly dominated single-author articles: multi-university collaboration grew significantly; and the numbers of research publications produced by teams working within a single institution or by a single author diminished. This study also demonstrated that multi-university collaboration produces higher-impact articles when it includes "Research Universities," that is, top-tier university schools. We also found that elite universities experienced impact degradation of their scientific results when they collaborated with lower-tier institutions, whereas their lower-tier partners gained impact benefits from the collaboration. Finally, our research revealed that Korean universities are unlikely to work with other universities in the same tier. This propensity for cross-tier collaboration can be interpreted as strategic partner selection by lower-tier schools seeking marginal advantage in citation impact. Addresses: [Ahn, Jongwuk; Lee, Jeong-Dong] Seoul Natl Univ, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program, Seoul, South Korea. [Oh, Dong-hyun] Inha Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Inchon, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: jwahn at snu.ac.kr; donghyun.oh at inha.ac.kr; leejd at snu.ac.kr Funding Acknowledgement: Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2012R1A1A1013071]; BK21 PLUS through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education; ICT R&D Program - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning; MOT Graduate School Program through the Korea Institute for the Advancement of Technology (KIAT) - Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy Funding Text: This research was jointly supported by: Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2012R1A1A1013071); the BK21 PLUS through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education; ICT R&D Program 2013 funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning; and MOT Graduate School Program through the Korea Institute for the Advancement of Technology (KIAT) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy. Cited Reference Count: 30 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300008 Cited References: Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P778 Lee S, 2005, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V35, P673 Katz JS, 1997, RESEARCH POLICY, V26, P1 Saxton T, 1997, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V40, P443 Carpenter J, 2000, STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, V19, P1141 Wray KB, 2002, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, V69, P150 Fleiss J. L., 2009, P237 HOCH PK, 1987, MINERVA, V25, P209 Belderbos R, 2004, RESEARCH POLICY, V33, P1477 Cronin B, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P855 Sonnenwald Diane H., 2007, ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V41, P643 Jones Benjamin F., 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P1259 Lee Yong-Gil, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V75, P463 Adams JD, 2005, RESEARCH POLICY, V34, P259 Frenken K., 2002, Economic Systems Research, V14, P345 Gazni Ali, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V63, P323 Hoekman Jarno, 2010, RESEARCH POLICY, V39, P662 Gulati R, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V19, P293 COLLINS HM, 1974, SCIENCE STUDIES, V4, P165 NARIN F, 1991, SCIENTOMETRICSINTERNATIONAL CONF ON OUTPUT INDICATORS FOR EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITY RESEARCH PROGRAM, JUN 14-15, 1990, PARIS, FRANCE, V21, P313 Kim KW, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V66, P231 Gazni Ali, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P251 KATZ JS, 1994, SCIENTOMETRICS, V31, P31 Guerrero-Bote V. P., 2013, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V64, P392 Diestre Luis, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V33, P1115 Waltman Ludo, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P37 Sooryamoorthy Radhamany, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P177 Beaver DD, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics, AUG, 2003, Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA, V60, P399 Franceschet Massimo, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P540 Van der Valk T., 2010, International Journal of Innovation Management, V14, P179 =================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Sentences to remember from the first 100 volumes of the journal *Scientometrics* Authors: Schubert, A Author Full Names: Schubert, Andras Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):1-13; 10.1007/s11192-014-1282-y JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Addresses: Hungarian Acad Sci, Lib & Informat Ctr, Dept Sci Policy & Scientometr, Budapest, Hungary. E-mail Addresses: schuba at iif.hu Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300001 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337502700007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: An analysis of a decade of research in 10 instructional design and technology *journals* Authors: West, RE; Borup, J Author Full Names: West, Richard Edward; Borup, Jered Source: BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 45 (4):545-556; 10.1111/bjet.12081 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: IMPACT FACTOR Abstract: In this paper, we review findings from an analysis of the past decade (2001-10) of research in 10 major journals in the field of instructional design and technology. Each research paper published in these journals during this decade was categorized according to its focus or methodology, topical keywords, authorship and citation trends; and the findings were aggregated across all of the journals to show trends over the last decade. We found there is a strong emphasis on technology-related issues, distance education, communication strategies and instructional methods over cognitive-related topics and learning issues. There is a strong history of theoretical inquiry and a fairly even balance of qualitative and quantitative research being published, with other research methods emerging. However, there are distinct differences in methodological stances among the journals. We also found some evidence that the Institute for Scientific Information Impact Factor may not be the best indicator of impact quality for journals in our field. Addresses: [West, Richard Edward] Brigham Young Univ, Instruct Psychol & Technol Dept, Provo, UT 84602 USA. [Borup, Jered] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA. E-mail Addresses: rickwest at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 46 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0007-1013 Web of Science Categories: Education & Educational Research; EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research Areas: Education & Educational Research IDS Number: AJ2QE Unique ID: WOS:000337502700007 Cited References: Nkomo Stella M., 2009, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V8, P106 West R. E., 2012, Innovative Higher Education, V37, P359 Amin M, 2003, MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, V63, P347 Ku Heng-Yu, 2009, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V57, P801 Kolodner JL, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, V12, P495 Barab S, 2005, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V53, P86 Cottle K., 2012, Educational Technology, V52, Lavie Peretz, 2009, JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, V18, P283 Markle D. T., 2011, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, V12, P3 Harzing A. W., 2013, Publish or Perish, version 3, Bennett Sue, 2008, BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, V39, P775 Carr-Chellman AA, 2006, BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, V37, P5 Corby K., 2001, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, V1, P279 Holcomb T. L., 2003, Educational Technology, V43, P53 Merrill MD, 2002, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V50, P43 Smith Alastair G., 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V74, P309 Ritzhaupt A.D., 2012, Educational Technology, V52, Beldarrain Y., 2006, Distance Education, V27, P139 Lincoln Y. S., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, Mott S.E., 2012, Educational Technology, V52, Zaugg H., 2011, Educational Technology, V51, Taris Toon, 2006, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, V15, P378 Opthof T, 1997, CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, V33, P1 Halverson L. R., 2011, Educational Technology, V51, P59 Randall D., 2011, Educational Technology, V51, P47 Mayer A. R., 2012, Educational Technology, V52, P34 West R. E., 2011, Educational Technology, V51, P60 Hew Khe Foon, 2007, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V55, P223 Rushby Nick, 2011, BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, V42, P885 Garrison D. R., 2001, American Journal of Distance Education, V15, P7 Juncker J., 2013, Educational Technology, V53, Harzing Anne-Wil, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P1057 HANNAFIN KM, 1991, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V39, P39 Drysdale J. S., 2013, Educational Technology, V53, P41 SIEVERT ME, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P334 Gall James E., 2010, ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, V58, P343 Warburton Steven, 2009, BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, V40, P414 Collins A, 2004, JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, V13, P15 Richey RC, 2011, INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN KNOWLEDGE BASE: THEORY, RESEARCH, AND PRACTICE, P1 Lee Y., 2007, P31 Barbour Michael K., 2013, HANDBOOK OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 3RD EDITION, P574 Foley Jennifer A., 2010, CORTEX, V46, P802 Billings C., 2012, Educational Technology, V52, P37 Oviatt D., 2012, Educational Technology, V52, Rich P.J., 2012, Educational Technology, V52, Price R. V., 2000, Educational Technology, V40, P47 ======================================================================== ) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Author name disambiguation using a graph model with node splitting and merging based on *bibliographic* information Authors: Shin, D; Kim, T; Choi, J; Kim, J Author Full Names: Shin, Dongwook; Kim, Taehwan; Choi, Joongmin; Kim, Jungsun Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):15-50; 10.1007/s11192-014-1289-4 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Author name disambiguation, Graph model, Namesake resolution, Heteronymous name resolution, Digital library KeyWords Plus: CITATIONS; WEB Abstract: Author ambiguity mainly arises when several different authors express their names in the same way, generally known as the namesake problem, and also when the name of an author is expressed in many different ways, referred to as the heteronymous name problem. These author ambiguity problems have long been an obstacle to efficient information retrieval in digital libraries, causing incorrect identification of authors and impeding correct classification of their publications. It is a nontrivial task to distinguish those authors, especially when there is very limited information about them. In this paper, we propose a graph based approach to author name disambiguation, where a graph model is constructed using the co-author relations, and author ambiguity is resolved by graph operations such as vertex (or node) splitting and merging based on the co-authorship. In our framework, called a Graph Framework for Author Disambiguation (GFAD), the namesake problem is solved by splitting an author vertex involved in multiple cycles of coauthorship, and the heteronymous name problem is handled by merging multiple author vertices having similar names if those vertices are connected to a common vertex. Experiments were carried out with the real DBLP and Arnetminer collections and the performance of GFAD is compared with three representative unsupervised author name disambiguation systems. We confirm that GFAD shows better overall performance from the perspective of representative evaluation metrics. An additional contribution is that we released the refined DBLP collection to the public to facilitate organizing a performance benchmark for future systems on author disambiguation. Addresses: [Shin, Dongwook; Kim, Taehwan; Choi, Joongmin; Kim, Jungsun] Hanyang Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Ansan 426791, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: foremostdw at gmail.com; kimth at islab.hanyang.ac.kr; jmchoi at hanyang.ac.kr; kimjs at hanyang.ac.kr Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300002 Cited References: Cota Ricardo G., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1853 Bhattacharya I., 2007, ACM Transaction on Knowledge Discovery from Data, V1, P5 Masada T., 2007, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Scalable Information Systems, Cherednichenko S., 2005, Outlier detection in clustering, Carvalho A., 2011, Journal of Information and Data Management, V2, P289 Wu Jiang, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P683 Pereira Denilson Alves, 2009, JCDL 09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES9th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conferene on Digital Libraries, JUN 15-19, 2009, Austin, TX, P49 Ferreira A., 2010, Proceedings the Tenth Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, P39 Klass V., 2007, Who's who in the world wide web: Approaches to name disambiguation, Ley M, 2002, Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval, V2476, P1 Ferreira Anderson A., 2012, SIGMOD RECORD, V41, P15 Scoville Caryn L, 2003, Medical reference services quarterly, V22, P1 Johnson D.B., 1975, SIAM Journal on Computing, V4, Wang X., 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE eleventh International Conference on Data Mining, P794 Han H., 2004, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8766)Proceedings of the Fourth ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 7-11 June 2004, Tucson, AZ, USA, Yang Kai-Hsiang, 2008, RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES12th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, SEP 14-19, 2008, Aarhus, DENMARK, V5173, P185 Levin F., 2010, Journal of Information and Data Management, V1, P183 Wooding S, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS8th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 23-25, 2004, Leiden, NETHERLANDS, V66, P11 Pereira Denilson Alves, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P919 Peng Hsin-Tsung, 2012, EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, V39, P10521 Yin X., 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, P1242 Tang J., 2011, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P1233 Bhattacharya I., 2006, Proceedings of the Sixth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Tan Y., 2006, Proceedings of the Sixth ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, P314 Fan X., 2011, ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality, V2, P10 Soler Jose M., 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P281 Benjelloun Omar, 2009, VLDB JOURNAL, V18, P255 Veloso Adriano, 2012, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V48, P680 Borgman CL, 1999, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V35, P227 Han H, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES, PROCEEDINGS5th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JUN 07-11, 2005, Denver, CO, P334 Kang In-Su, 2009, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V45, P84 Pasula H., 2003, Advances in Neural Information Systems, V15, P1401 Tang J., 2008, Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P990 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337157100007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: *Scientometric* sorting by importance for literatures on life cycle assessments and some related methodological discussions Authors: Qian, G Author Full Names: Qian, Ge Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 19 (7):1462-1467; 10.1007/s11367-014-0747-9 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Betweenness centrality metric, Citation frequency, CiteSpace II, Document co-citation analysis, Life cycle assessments, Scientometric method KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH FIELD; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; COCITATION; VISUALIZATION; SCIENCE Abstract: This paper aims to sort the literatures on life cycle assessments (LCA) by their respective importance through citation and co-citation analysis and to further discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these kinds of *scientometric* methods in the case of LCA research. CiteSpace II was used to generate document co-citation networks based on 3,824 articles retrieved from the ISI Web of Science database on this topic. Table 1 provides the top 50 highest cited documents in the LCA field. Here, we use two indicators, i.e., citation frequency in citation analysis and betweenness centrality metric in co-citation analysis, to measure the importance of these LCA literatures. Citation and co-citation analysis are useful for environmental scientists and engineers to get a better understanding of the inner structure of LCA research. However, like all other research methods, this kind of analysis has some limitations. On the one hand, *Scientometric* studies and related software are very dependent on ISI Web of Science database, but considering the ISI Web of Science only began to track the LCA field fairly recently, the Scopus database would probably give a fuller picture. On the other hand, since the essence of *scientometrics* analysis is outsiders commenting insiders, so with only citation and co-citation analysis, to our understanding of the past, present, and future of LCA field, is insufficient. Addresses: Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Theoret Teaching & Res Dept, Humanities Coll, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: qiange at mail.shufe.edu.cn Funding Acknowledgement: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics) [2012110044] Funding Text: This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No. 2012110044). The author is very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors of the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment for their valuable comments and advices. Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY ISSN: 0948-3349 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Research Areas: Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology IDS Number: AI8IT Unique ID: WOS:000337157100007 Cited References: SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 Klopffer W, 2002, Int J Life Cycle Assess, V7, P311 Ahlgren P, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P550 Leydesdorff Loet, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V58, P25 Qian Ge, 2013, CURRENT SCIENCE, V105, P1666 Newton I, 1965, On the shoulders of giants, Qian Ge, 2012, DISASTER ADVANCES, V5, P704 Cobo M. J., 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P146 Leydesdorff Loet, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P1616 MALIN MV, 1968, LIBRARY TRENDS, V16, P374 Small HG, 1984, Scientometrics, V7, P391 SMITH LC, 1981, LIBRARY TRENDS, V30, P83 BROOKS TA, 1986, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V37, P34 Freidberg Susanne, 2013, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, V42, P571 Hunt RG, 1996, Int J Life Cycle Assess, V1, P4 Qian Ge, 2013, JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGYInternational Conference on Agricultural, Food and Biological Engineering (ICAFBE), 2012, Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA, V7, P305 Garfield E, 1965, Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, Narin F, 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, SMALL H, 1980, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V36, P183 WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 Baumann H, 2002, J Ind Ecol, V6, P13 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V1, P215 SMALL H, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICSEUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON SCIENTOMETRIC METHODS OF RESEARCH EVALUATION IN THE SCIENCES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, APR 13-17, 1991, POTSDAM, GERMANY, V26, P5 Baumann H, 2002, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, V7, P2 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Time-varying causality between research output and economic growth in US Authors: Inglesi-Lotz, R; Balcilar, M; Gupta, R Author Full Names: Inglesi-Lotz, Roula; Balcilar, Mehmet; Gupta, Rangan Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):203-216; 10.1007/s11192-014-1257-z JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Research output, Scientometrics, Economic growth, Causality KeyWords Plus: UNIT-ROOT; AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS; PARAMETER INSTABILITY; SERIES REGRESSION; BASIC RESEARCH; TESTS; INDICATORS; SCIENCE; AFRICA; IMPACT Abstract: This main purpose of this paper is to investigate the causal relationship between knowledge (research output) and economic growth in US over 1981-2011. To overcome the issues of ignoring possible instability and hence, falsely assuming a constant relationship through the years, we use bootstrapped Granger non-causality tests with fixed-size rolling-window to analyze time-varying causal links between two series. Instead of just performing causality tests on the full sample which assumes a single causality relationship, we also perform Granger causality tests on the rolling sub-samples with a fixed-window size. Unlike the full-sample Granger causality test, this method allows us to capture any structural shifts in the model, as well as, the evolution of causal relationships between sub-periods, with the bootstrapping approach controlling for small-sample bias. Full-sample bootstrap causality tests reveal no causal relationship between research and growth in the US. Further, parameter stability tests indicate that there were structural shifts in the relationship, and hence, we cannot entirely rely on full-sample results. The bootstrap rolling-window causality tests show that during the sub-periods of 2003-2005 and 2009, GDP Granger caused research output; while in 2010, the causality ran in the opposite direction. Using a two-state regime switching vector smooth autoregressive model, we find unidirectional Granger causality from research output to GDP in the full sample. Addresses: [Inglesi-Lotz, Roula; Gupta, Rangan] Univ Pretoria, Dept Econ, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa. [Balcilar, Mehmet] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Dept Econ, Famagusta, Turkey. E-mail Addresses: roula.inglesi-lotz at up.ac.za Cited Reference Count: 50 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300010 Cited References: TODA HY, 1995, JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, V66, P225 Lee Ling-Chu, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P465 LUUKKONEN R, 1988, BIOMETRIKA, V75, P491 PAVITT K, 1991, RESEARCH POLICY, V20, P109 Price D. S., 1978, Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, Lundbergh S., 2002, A companion to economic forecasting, P485 Hacker R. Scott, 2006, APPLIED ECONOMICS, V38, P1489 Fedderke J. W., 2006, Economic Change, V39, P125 Barnett A., 2012, Bank of England Working Papers 450, Fedderke J. W., 2005, Working Paper No. 27, ANDREWS DWK, 1994, ECONOMETRICA, V62, P1383 ANDREWS DWK, 1993, ECONOMETRICA, V61, P821 Van Dijk D., 2002, Econometric Reviews, V21, P1 Dolado J. J., 1996, Econometric Reviews, V15, P369 Inglesi-Lotz R., 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P129 Shukur G., 1997, Working Paper 1997:3, LUCAS RE, 1988, JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, V22, P3 De Moya-Anegon F, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS, V46, P299 Kealey T., 1996, The economic laws of scientific research, Inglesi-Lotz Roula, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P747 Nelson R. R., 1996, Challenge, V39, P9 Mackinnon JG, 1996, JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, V11, P601 HOROWITZ JL, 1994, JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, V61, P395 HANSEN BE, 1992, JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, V14, P517 Tsay RS, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, V93, P1188 Mantalos P, 2000, STUDIES IN NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, V4, P17 Shukur G., 1997, Working paper 1998:1, Psaradakis Z, 2005, JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, V20, P665 Pouris Anastassios, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P297 De Gooije G., 2004, International Journal of Forecasting, V20, P237 PHILLIPS PCB, 1987, ECONOMETRICA, V55, P277 ROMER PM, 1986, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V94, P1002 Groenewold N, 1999, MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, V48, P531 Balcilar Mehmet, 2010, ENERGY ECONOMICS, V32, P1398 Shelton R. D., 2011, 13th International conference on scientometrics and informetrics, July, 2011, Durban, Mantalos P, 1998, OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V60, P249 Stock JH, 1996, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, V14, P11 Inglesi-Lotz R., 2013, Working Paper 201337, Salter AJ, 2001, RESEARCH POLICY, V30, P509 Schumpeter J. A., 2000, Entrepreneurship: The social science view, P51 JOHANSEN S, 1991, ECONOMETRICA, V59, P1551 Granger CWJ, 1996, JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, V11, P455 Vinkler Peter, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V74, P237 King DA, 2004, NATURE, V430, P311 Balcilar M., 2013, Working Paper No. 201308, Tamura R. F., 1991, Working Paper No. 91-17, PHILLIPS PCB, 1988, BIOMETRIKA, V75, P335 EFRON B, 1979, ANNALS OF STATISTICS, V7, P1 Terasvirta T, 1998, HANDBOOK OF APPLIED ECONOMIC STATISTICS, V155, P507 Rothman P, 2001, MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICSWorkshop on Multivariate Nonlinear Models in Econometrics, SEP 17-18, 1999, ROTTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, V5, P506 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications: a comparison between Australia and the rest of the world Authors: Gorjiara, T; Baldock, C Author Full Names: Gorjiara, T.; Baldock, C. Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):121-148; 10.1007/s11192-014-1287-6 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometric, Lexical query, Australia KeyWords Plus: SEARCH STRATEGY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; JOURNALS; PATENTS; TERMS; CHINA; DELINEATION; CATEGORIES; EMERGENCE Abstract: Nanoscience and nanotechnology are research areas of a multidisciplinary nature. Having a good knowledge of the rapidly evolving nature of these research areas is important to understand the research paths, as well as national and global developments in these areas. Accordingly, in this reported study nanoscience and nanotechnology research undertaken globally was compared with that of Australia by way of analyzing research publications. Initially, four different bibliometric Boolean-based search methodologies were used to analyze publications in the Web of Science database (Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Knowledge). These methodologies were (a) lexical query, (b) search in nanoscience and nanotechnology journals, (c) combination of lexical query and journal search and (d) search in the ten nano-journals with the highest impact factors. Based on results obtained, the third methodology was found to be the most comprehensive approach. Consequently, this search methodology was used to compare global and Australian nanoscience and nanotechnology publications for the period 1988-2000. Results demonstrated that depending on the search technique used, Australia ranks fourteenth to seventeenth internationally with a higher than world average number of nanoscience and nanotechnology publications. Over the last decade, Australia showed a relative growth rate in nanoscience and nanotechnology publications of 16 % compared to 12 % for the rest of the world. Researchers from China, the USA and the UK are from the main countries that collaborate with Australian researchers in nanoscience and nanotechnology publications. Addresses: [Gorjiara, T.; Baldock, C.] Macquarie Univ, Fac Sci, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia. [Gorjiara, T.] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. [Gorjiara, T.] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Radiat Oncol, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. E-mail Addresses: clive.baldock at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 44 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300006 Cited References: Zitt Michel, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1513 Australian Academy of Science, 2012, National nanotechnology research strategy, Bajwa R. S., 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P333 Roco M. C., 2001, NSET workshop report, Huang Can, 2011, JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, V36, P145 Lopez Cadenas Maria Sonsire, 2011, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V13, P3101 Glanzel W., 2003, Nano-technology: Analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavour, Leydesdorff Loet, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P589 Karpagam R., 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P501 Leydesdorff Loet, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P693 Etxebarria Goio, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P253 Roco MC, 2005, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V7, P1 Bajwa R. S., 2012, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V14, Wang Gangbo, 2011, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V13, P6245 Zhou P, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY, V35, P83 Tang Li, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P299 Rafols Ismael, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1871 Kay Luciano, 2009, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V11, P259 Avila-Robinson Alfonso, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P829 Leydesdorff Loet, 2008, SCIENTOMETRICS, V76, P159 Bhattacharya Sujit, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICSJoint Meeting of the 7th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics / 12th COLLNET Meeting, SEP 20-23, 2011, Istanbul, TURKEY, V93, P59 Barcikowski Stephan, 2009, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V11, P1883 Harzing Anne-Wil, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P23 Mahapatra M., 1985, Proceedings of the 15th IASLIC conference, 1985, Bangalore, P61 Youtie Jan, 2008, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V10, P981 Mohammadi Ehsan, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P593 Arora Sanjay K., 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P351 Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, 2013, ATSE submission Australia in the Asian century policy, Organisation for economic co-operation and developement, 2013, Gross domestic expenditure on R-D by sector of performance and source of funds, Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P348 Sigogneau A, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V47, P589 Terekhov A. I., 2012, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V14, Porter Alan L., 2008, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V10, P715 Mogoutov Andrei, 2007, RESEARCH POLICY, V36, P893 Hwang D., 2009, State of the Market Report, UNESCO: Institute for Statistics, 2013, Reports in science, technology and innovation, Simmons M. Y., 2009, Emerging nanotechnology power, Menendez-Manjon Ana, 2011, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V13, P3911 Australian Office of Nanotechnology, 2008, Organisation for economic co-operation and developement, 2013, R-D personnel by sector of employment and field of science, Leydesdorff Loet, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V94, P35 Australian Academy of Science, 2009, Nanotechnology in Australia: Trends, applications and collaborative opportunities, Noyons E. C. M., 2003, Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe nanoscience and nanotechnology, Department of industry I., Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, 2013, Australia-China Science and Research Fund, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300013 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation Authors: Lu, K; Ajiferuke, I; Wolfram, D Author Full Names: Lu, Kun; Ajiferuke, Isola; Wolfram, Dietmar Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):245-260; 10.1007/s11192-014-1274-y JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CITATION ANALYSIS; METRICS Abstract: The concept of citer analysis investigated earlier by Ajiferuke and Wolfram (In: B. Larsen, J. Leta (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the international society for *scientometrics* and informetrics (ISSI) pp. 798-808, 2009, *Scientometrics* 83:623-638, 2010) is extended to journals where different citing units (citers, citing articles, citing journals) are compared with the journal impact factor and each other to determine if differences in ranking arise from different measures. The citer measures for the 31 high impact journals studied from information science and library science are significantly correlated, even more so than the earlier citer analysis findings, indicating that there is a close relationship among the different units of measure. Still, notable differences in rankings for the journals examined were evident for the different measures used, especially from either 5-year impact factor or number of citing articles per publication to the number of citing journals per publication. The journals that are adversely affected seem to be those whose citations are concentrated in a few journals. This informed the need to develop a journal citation concentration index, which can serve as a complementary measure to the existing journal impact indices. Addresses: [Lu, Kun] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Bizzell Lib, Norman, OK 73019 USA. [Ajiferuke, Isola] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada. [Wolfram, Dietmar] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA. E-mail Addresses: iajiferu at uwo.ca Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300013 Cited References: Rousseau R, 2002, LIBRARY TRENDS, V50, P418 Ioannidis John P. A., 2006, PLOS ONE, V1, Pendlebury David A., 2009, ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, V57, P1 Smalheiser N. R., 2009, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, V43, P1 Strotmann A., 2009, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V46, P1 Rousseau Ronald, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P413 Zitt M, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V41, P255 Ajiferuke Isola, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2086 GARFIELD E, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P195 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Archambault Eric, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P635 Bergstrom Carl T., 2008, JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, V28, P11433 Moed Henk F., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P367 DIEKS D, 1976, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V6, P247 MACROBERTS MH, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P342 Franceschini Fiorenzo, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P203 PRATT AD, 1977, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V28, P285 Althouse B. M., 2008, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V60, P27 Ajiferuke Isola, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P623 Glanzel W, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 17, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V53, P171 Gonzalez-Pereira Borja, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P379 Egghe L., 2012, Scientometrics, P1 Ajiferuke Isola, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 212th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 14-17, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, V2, P798 Ajiferuke Isola, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P292 Bollen J, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1419 Vanclay Jerome K., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P211 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337262600041 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: ESSAYS IN *BIBLIOGRAPHICAL* HISTORY Authors: Baker, W Author Full Names: Baker, William Source: TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, (5802):29-29; JUN 13 2014 Language: English Document Type: Book Review Cited Reference Count: 1 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: TIMES SUPPLEMENTS LIMITED, TOWER HOUSE, SOVEREIGN PARK, MARKET HARBOROUGH LE87 4JJ, ENGLAND ISSN: 0307-661X Web of Science Categories: Humanities, Multidisciplinary Research Areas: Arts & Humanities - Other Topics IDS Number: AI9OT Unique ID: WOS:000337262600041 Cited References: TANSELLE GT, ESSAYS BIBLIO HIST, ===================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337165600095 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Co-Authorship and *Bibliographic* Coupling Network Effects on Citations Authors: Biscaro, C; Giupponi, C Author Full Names: Biscaro, Claudio; Giupponi, Carlo Source: PLOS ONE, 9 (6):10.1371/journal.pone.0099502 JUN 9 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; PRODUCTIVITY; CREATIVITY; INNOVATION; MODELS; GROWTH Abstract: This paper analyzes the effects of the co-authorship and *bibliographic* coupling networks on the citations received by scientific articles. It expands prior research that limited its focus on the position of co-authors and incorporates the effects of the use of knowledge sources within articles: references. By creating a network on the basis of shared references, we propose a way to understand whether an article bridges among extant strands of literature and infer the size of its research community and its embeddedness. Thus, we map onto the article - our unit of analysis - the metrics of authors' position in the co-authorship network and of the use of knowledge on which the scientific article is grounded. Specifically, we adopt centrality measures - degree, betweenneess, and closeness centrality - in the co-authorship network and degree, betweenness centrality and clustering coefficient in the *bibliographic* coupling and show their influence on the citations received in first two years after the year of publication. Findings show that authors' degree positively impacts citations. Also closeness centrality has a positive effect manifested only when the giant component is relevant. Author's betweenness centrality has instead a negative effect that persists until the giant component - largest component of the network in which all nodes can be linked by a path - is relevant. Moreover, articles that draw on fragmented strands of literature tend to be cited more, whereas the size of the scientific research community and the embeddedness of the article in a cohesive cluster of literature have no effect. Addresses: [Biscaro, Claudio; Giupponi, Carlo] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, Venice, Italy. [Biscaro, Claudio] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Management, Venice, Italy. [Biscaro, Claudio] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Org & Globale Managementstudien, A-4040 Linz, Austria. E-mail Addresses: claudio.biscaro at jku.at Funding Acknowledgement: KULTURisk Project [FP7-ENV.2010.1.3.2-1-265280] Funding Text: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the KULTURisk Project (FP7-ENV.2010.1.3.2-1-265280). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Cited Reference Count: 45 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA ISSN: 1932-6203 Article Number: e99502 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences; MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AI8LF Unique ID: WOS:000337165600095 Cited References: Janssen Marco A., 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONSWorkshop on Vulnerability, Resilience and Adaptation, FEB, 2005, Tempe, AZ, V16, P240 Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 Simonton DK, 1995, The nature of insight, P465 Mazloumian A, 2011, Plos One, V6, Blei David M., 2007, ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, V1, P17 Uddin Shahadat, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P687 Polanyi M, 2000, MINERVA, V38, P1 Wallace Matthew L., 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Larsen Peder Olesen, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P575 Newman MEJ, 2009, Epl, V86, Newman M. E. J., 2010, Networks-An Introduction, Hargadon A, 1997, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V42, P716 Yin Li-chun, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1599 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 Jose AM, 1996, WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTIONRegional Workshop on Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Asia and the Pacific, JAN 15-19, 1996, MANILA, PHILIPPINES, V92, P191 Moretti E, 2012, The new geography of jobs: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, SIMON HA, 1973, AMERICAN SCIENTIST, V61, P394 Blei David M., 2012, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, V55, P77 Schilling MA, 2005, CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, V17, P131 Sun XL, 2013, Scientific Reports, V3, Kaplan S, 2012, Economic, Goh KI, 2003, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V67, Yan Erjia, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P2107 Turner BL, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V100, P8074 Chang Jonathan, 2010, ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, V4, P124 Adger W. Neil, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONSWorkshop on Vulnerability, Resilience and Adaptation, FEB, 2005, Tempe, AZ, V16, P268 Dekas Kathryn H., 2013, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, V27, P219 Csardi G, 2006, InterJournal, Complex Systems, V1695, Dorta-Gonzalez P., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P593 Burt RS, 2004, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V110, P349 Heinze Thomas, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P811 Uddin S, 2013, Plos One, V8, Simonton DK, 1999, PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, V10, P309 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 Catmull E, 2008, How Pixar fosters collective creativity, Perry-Smith JE, 2006, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V49, P85 Janssen MA, 2007, Ecology and Society, V12, Frigotto M. Laura, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P397 Bettencourt Luis M. A., 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P7301 Ioannidis John P. A., 2006, PLOS ONE, V1, Newman MEJ, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V98, P404 Blei DM, 2003, JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH18th International Conference on Machine Learning, JUN 28-JUL 01, 2001, WILLIAMSTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, V3, P993 Strzepek KM, 1996, CLIMATE RESEARCHWorkshop on Vulnerability and Adaptation of African Ecosystems to Global Climate Change, MAR 07-15, 1995, HARARE, ZIMBABWE, V6, P89 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Maske KL, 2003, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V41, P555 ================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337339100003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Re: Chen et al.: Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology *journals* (Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1697-701) Authors: Sugar, A Author Full Names: Sugar, Alan Group Author(s): Editorial Board Cornea Source: OPHTHALMOLOGY, 121 (6):E29-E29; JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Letter Addresses: [Sugar, Alan; Editorial Board Cornea] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA. Cited Reference Count: 2 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA ISSN: 0161-6420 Web of Science Categories: Ophthalmology; OPHTHALMOLOGY Research Areas: Ophthalmology IDS Number: AJ0KG Unique ID: WOS:000337339100003 Cited References: Schachat Andrew P., 2013, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V120, P1513 Chen Haoyu, 2013, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V120, P1697 ======================================================================== *Record 16 of 36. Search terms matched: BIBLIOGRAPHICAL(1); JOURNALS(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337098500027 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Brazilian *bibliographical* output on public oral health in public health and dentistry *journals* Authors: Celeste, RK; Warmling, CM Author Full Names: Celeste, Roger Keller; Warmling, Cristine Maria Source: CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 19 (6):1921-1932; 10.1590/1413-81232014196.04932013 JUN 2014 Language: Portuguese Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometrics, Oral health, Public health, Science, Dentistry KeyWords Plus: DE-SAUDE-PUBLICA; DENTAL RESEARCH; TRENDS; WORLD Abstract: The scope of this paper is to describe characteristics of the scientific output in the area of public oral health in journals on public health and dentistry nationwide. The Scopus database of abstracts and quotations was used and eight journals in public health, as well as ten in dentistry, dating from 1947 to 2011 were selected. A research strategy using key words regarding oral health in public health and key words about public health in dentistry was used to locate articles. The themes selected were based on the frequency of key words. Of the total number of articles, 4.7% (n = 642) were found in oral health journals and 6.8% (n = 245) in public health journals. Among the authors who published most, only 12% published in both fields. There was a percentile growth of public oral health publications in dentistry journals, though not in public health journals. In dentistry, only studies indexed as being on the topic of epidemiology showed an increase. In the area of public health, planning was predominant in all the phases studied. Research to evaluate the impact of research and postgraduate policies in scientific production is required. Addresses: [Celeste, Roger Keller] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Odontol, Programa Posgrad Odontol Saude Bucal Colet, BR-90040060 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. [Warmling, Cristine Maria] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Programa Posgrad Ensino Saude, BR-90040060 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. E-mail Addresses: roger.keller at ufrgs.br Cited Reference Count: 31 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ABRASCO, RUA HESPERIA, 16-PARTE MANGUINHOS, RIO DE JANEIRO, 21050-040, BRAZIL ISSN: 1413-8123 Web of Science Categories: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SSCI Research Areas: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health IDS Number: AI7SN Unique ID: WOS:000337098500027 Cited References: Pordeus Isabela Almeida, 2009, Brazilian oral research, V23, P227 Narvai P C, 1998, Cadernos de sa?de p?blica, V14, P513 Amorim Karla Patr?cia Cardoso, 2007, Interface - Comunica??o, Sa?de, Educa??o, V11, P9 Solla Price DJ, 1975, Science since Babylon: enlarged edition, Figueiredo Castro Regina C., 2006, REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V40, P57 Gil-Montoya JA, 2006, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, V114, P102 Coimbra C E Jr, 1999, Cadernos de sa?de p?blica, V15, P883 Nadanovsky Paulo, 2006, Cadernos de Sa?de P?blica, V22, P886 Celeste Roger Keller, 2011, CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V27, P183 Botazzo C, 1994, A saude bucal nas praticas coletivas de saude, Faerstein E, 2011, Anais do VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Epidemiologia, Sao Paulo, Anhembi, Cavalcanti AL, 2004, Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr, V4, P99 Oliveira MP, 2011, Arq Odontol, V47, P31 Carvalho Leandro, 2007, CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V23, P3023 Dias Aldo Angelim, 2008, REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, V24, P54 Barata Rita Barradas, 2007, CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V23, P3031 Luz Madel T., 2009, SAUDE E SOCIEDADE, V18, P304 Jaime Miranda J., 2010, REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V44, P185 Gauthier E., 1998, Bibliometric analysis of scientific and tech- nological research: a user's guide to the methodology, Junges Jose Roque, 2012, CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, V17, P1049 Fernandez-Cano A, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V61, P301 Campos GWS, 2000, Cien Saude Colet, V5, P219 Luz Madel T., 2005, Physis: Revista de Sa?de Coletiva, V15, P39 Scariot Rafaela, 2011, BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, V25, P197 Glanzel W, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P67 Cury J., 2004, Braz Oral Res, V18, P1 Pereira Julio Cesar Rodrigues, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V73, P37 Camargo Jr Kenneth Rochel de, 2010, Revista de sa?de p?blica, V44, P394 de Souza Minayo Maria Cecilia, 2010, CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, V15, P1897 Nunes Everardo Duarte, 2010, CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, V15, P1935 Xavier AFC, 2011, Arq Odontol, V47, P127 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *Record 20 of 36. Search terms matched: JOURNALS(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337256900034 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Publishing in open access era: focus on respiratory *journals* Authors: Dai, N; Xu, DY; Zhong, XY; Li, L; Ling, QB; Bu, ZD Author Full Names: Dai, Ni; Xu, Dingyao; Zhong, Xiyao; Li, Li; Ling, Qibo; Bu, Zhaode Source: JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 6 (5):564-567; 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.03.18 MAY 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Author Keywords: Open access, respiratory journal, copyright, peer review, processing fee, business model KeyWords Plus: PREPRINT SERVERS Abstract: We have entered an open access publishing era. The impact and significance of open access is still under debate after two decades of evolution. Open access journals benefit researchers and the general public by promoting visibility, sharing and communicating. Non-mainstream journals should turn the challenge of open access into opportunity of presenting best research articles to the global readership. Open access journals need to optimize their business models to promote the healthy and continuous development. Addresses: [Dai, Ni; Xu, Dingyao; Zhong, Xiyao; Li, Li; Ling, Qibo; Bu, Zhaode] Peking Univ Canc Hosp & Inst, Editorial Off CJCR, Minist Educ, Key Lab Carcinogenesis & Translat Res, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China. [Bu, Zhaode] Peking Univ Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: daini at vip.163.com Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: PIONEER BIOSCIENCE PUBL CO, 9A GOLD SHINE TOWER, 346-348 QUEEN'S RD CENTRAL, SHEUNG WAN, HONG KONG, 00000, PEOPLES R CHINA ISSN: 2072-1439 Web of Science Categories: Respiratory System Research Areas: Respiratory System IDS Number: AI9MO Unique ID: WOS:000337256900034 Cited References: Bayry Jagadeesh, 2013, NATURE, V497, P40 Wolpert Ann J., 2013, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V368, P785 Eysenbach G, 2000, CURRENT OPINION IN IMMUNOLOGY, V12, P499 Eysenbach Gunther, 2006, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, V8, Gasparyan Armen Yuri, 2013, CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, V54, P403 Bjork Bo-Christer, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Suber P., 2012, Open access overview, Hendee William, 2013, MEDICAL PHYSICS, V40, Gargouri Yassine, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Solomon D, 2013, Publications, V1, P16 Jones Roger, 2012, BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, V62, P514 Frank Martin, 2013, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V368, P787 Salem Deeb N., 2013, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V369, P491 Suh Chang-Ok, 2013, JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, V28, P648 Baric Hrvoje, 2013, CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, V54, P315 Till JE, 2001, LEARNED PUBLISHING, V14, P7 Cummings J., 2013, New Library World, V114, ======================================================================== ======================================================================== * ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337201100003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: On Innovation, Instability, and Growth. A Review and an Interpretative Framework Authors: Pammolli, F Author Full Names: Pammolli, Fabio Source: ECONOMIA POLITICA, 31 (1):17-32; APR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SIZE DISTRIBUTION; BUSINESS FIRMS; GIBRATS LAW; AGGREGATE FLUCTUATIONS; EVOLUTION; DIVERSIFICATION; DYNAMICS; CITIES; ZIPF; DISTRIBUTIONS Abstract: In this paper I refer to and summarize the main findings of the stochastic benchmark developed together with S. Buldyrev, M. Riccaboni, and RE. Stanley to analyze business firms growth and corporate dynamics. The framework encompasses the Gibrat's Law of Proportionate Effect and the growth process originally described by Herbert A. Simon as particular instances. The framework generates testable propositions along four different dimensions: i) firm size distribution, the distribution of firm growth rates, and iii-iv) the relationships between firm size and the mean and volatility of firm growth rates. The predictions of the stochastic benchmark are not falsified across different data sets. Both size and growth distributions are fat tailed, while innovation, competition, and instability at the level of products and firms map onto macroeconomic shocks at the aggregate level of Country GDP. First, the probability density function of growth rates appears to be invariant at different scales of observation and across periods, with its central body well approximated by a Laplace distribution and tails that contain many more events than predicted by a Gaussian probability density function and exhibit an inverse cubic power law. Second, since firm size distribution is fat-tailed, micro-level shocks that affect large firms generate aggregate fluctuations, and GDP volatility remains substantial even for large diversified Countries. The proportional growth benchmark sketched in the paper suggests that the origins, magnitude, composition, and propagation of microeconomic shocks from business firms are key to understand the state of economy and GDP growth and volatility. Addresses: IMT Inst Adv Studies, I-55100 Lucca, LU, Italy. E-mail Addresses: f.pammolli at imtlucca.it Cited Reference Count: 73 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SOC ED IL MULINO, STRADA MAGGIORE 37, 40125 BOLOGNA, ITALY ISSN: 1120-2890 Web of Science Categories: Economics; ECONOMICS Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AI8TY Unique ID: WOS:000337201100003 Cited References: Growiec J., 2013, Innovation and Corporate Dynamics: A Theoretical Framework, Kalecki M., 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P161 Axtell RL, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P1818 LONG JB, 1983, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V91, P39 McKelvey M., 2005, Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe, Szyszkowicz Sebastian S., 2007, 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-14IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2007), JUN 24-28, 2007, Glasgow, SCOTLAND, P5324 Imbs J, 2003, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V93, P63 David P.A., 1993, Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, Washington D.C., JOVANOVIC B, 1982, ECONOMETRICA, V50, P649 LUCAS RE, 1988, JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, V22, P3 STANLEY MHR, 1995, ECONOMICS LETTERS, V49, P453 Carvalho V., 2010, Aggregate Fluctuations and the Network Structure of Intersectoral Trade, HYMER S, 1962, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V70, P556 Barro Robert J., 2011, ECONOMETRICA, V79, P1567 Clauset Aaron, 2009, SIAM REVIEW, V51, P661 Pammolli F., 2007, Journal of the European Economic Association, V5, P574 Kotz S., 2001, The Laplace Distribution and Generalizations: A Revisit with Applications to Communications, Economics, Engineering, and Finance, Luttmer Erzo G. J., 2010, ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 2, V2, P547 Coad A, 2009, GROWTH OF FIRMS: A SURVEY OF THEORIES AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, P1 Cabral LMB, 2003, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V93, P1075 Klepper Steven, 2006, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V37, P861 Acemoglu D., 2010, Cascades in Networks and Aggregate Volatility, Steindl J., 1965, Random Processes and the Growth of Firms: A Study of the Pareto Law, HOPENHAYN HA, 1992, ECONOMETRICA, V60, P1127 Slimane S., 2001, IEEE Transactions on Communications, V49, P975 Caves RE, 1998, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V36, P1947 Koren Miklos, 2013, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V103, P378 Growiec Jakub, 2008, ECONOMICS LETTERS, V98, P207 Buldyrev S.V., 2013, The Rise and Fall of Business Firms, Manuscript, Sutton J., 2012, Competing in Capabilities. The Globalization Process, Reed WJ, 2001, ECONOMICS LETTERS, V74, P15 Levy Moshe, 2009, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V99, P1672 Riccaboni M., 2010, New Journal of Physics, V12, P1 Eeckhout J, 2004, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V94, P1429 Luttmer Erzo G. J., 2007, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V122, P1103 Yule GU, 1925, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-CONTAINING PAPERS OF A BIOLOGICAL CHARACTER, V213, P21 Gibrat R., 1931, Les Inegalites economiques; Applications: aux Inegalites des Richesses, a la Concentration des Entreprises, aux Populations des Villes, aux Statistiques des Familles, etc., d'une Loi Nouvelle, la Loi de l'Effet Proportionnel, Brock W., 1999, Industrial and Corporate Change, V8, P409 Eeckhout Jan, 2009, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V99, P1676 De Fabritiis G, 2003, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONSInternational Econophysics Conference, AUG 28-31, 2002, BALI, INDONESIA, V324, P38 KYDLAND FE, 1982, ECONOMETRICA, V50, P1345 Feller W., 1957, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Sutton J, 2002, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V312, P577 Gabaix X, 1999, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V114, P739 Aoki M., 2002, Modeling Aggregate Behavior and Fluctuations in Economics, Etro F., 2004, Economic Journal, V114, P281 Carvalho Vasco, 2013, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V103, P1697 Sutton J., 2007, P2301 Rossi-Hansberg Esteban, 2007, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V97, P1639 Riccaboni Massimo, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P19595 Mitzenmacher M., 2004, Internet Math, V1, P226 Acemoglu D, 1997, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V105, P709 ABRAMOVITZ M, 1956, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V46, P5 Fu DF, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P18801 de Wit G, 2005, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, V23, P423 Yamasaki K., 2006, Physical Review E, V74, P304 Bottazzi G, 2001, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, V19, P1161 Stanley MHR, 1996, NATURE, V379, P804 Gabaix X., 2010, Annual Review of Economics, V1, P255 Sutton J., 1998, Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History, Klette TJ, 2004, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V112, P986 MANSFIELD E, 1962, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V52, P1023 Hall Robert E., 2010, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V100, P1163 Lee YK, 1998, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V81, P3275 Nelson RR, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY, V32, P909 SIMON HA, 1958, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V48, P607 EVANS DS, 1987, JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, V35, P567 Gabaix Xavier, 2011, ECONOMETRICA, V79, P733 Koren Miklos, 2007, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V122, P243 Acemoglu D., 2005, Comment on The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility, NBER Macroe-conomics Annual, Sutton J, 1997, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, V35, P40 Malevergne Y., 2009, Ijiri Y., 1977, Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337302600022 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A General Model for Mutual Ranking Systems Authors: Anh, VL; Hoang, HV; Trung, KL; Trung, HL; Jung, JJ Author Full Names: Vu Le Anh; Hai Vo Hoang; Kien Le Trung; Hieu Le Trung; Jung, Jason J. Editor(s): Nguyen NT; Attachoo B; Trawinski B; Somboonviwat K Source: INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS, PT 1, 8397 211-220; 2014 Book Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 6th Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS) Conference Date: APR 07-09, 2014 Conference Location: Bangkok, THAILAND Conference Sponsors: King Mongkuts Inst Technol Ladkrabang, Wroclaw Univ Technol, IEEE SMC Tech Comm Computat Collect Intelligence, Hue Univ, Univ Informat Technol HCM, Quang Binh Univ Author Keywords: N-star ranking, Markov chain, PageRank, Academic ranking, Conference ranking, Ranking algorithms, Prolific ranking, Recommendation systems, Bibliographical database, DBLP Abstract: Ranking has been applied in many domains using recommendation systems such as search engine, e-commerce, and so on. We will introduce and study N-linear mutual ranking, which can rank n classes of objects at once. The ranking scores of these classes are dependent to the others. For instance, PageRank by Google is a 2-linear mutual ranking, which ranks the webpages and links at once. Particularly, we focus to N-star ranking model and demonstrate it in ranking conference and journal problems. We have conducted the experiments for the models in which the citations are not considered. The experimental results are based on the DBLP dataset, which contains more than one million papers, authors and thousands of conferences and journals in computer science. Finally, N-star ranking is a very strong ranking algorithm can be applied in many real-world problems. Addresses: [Vu Le Anh; Jung, Jason J.] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. E-mail Addresses: vohoanghai2 at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 15 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 0302-9743 ISBN: 978-3-319-05476-6 ISBN: 978-3-319-05475-9 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods Research Areas: Computer Science IDS Number: BA6XT Unique ID: WOS:000337302600022 Cited References: BRIN S, 1998, P 7 INT WORLD WID WE, V30, P107 Kien L.T., 2009, Vietnam Journal of Mathematics, V37, P475 Microsoft Corporation, 2013, Microsoft Academic Search, KEENER JP, 1993, SIAM REVIEW, V35, P80 Snchez-Burillo E., 2012, Quantum Navigation and Ranking in Complex Networks Nature online journal, Collins M., 2002, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, P489 Ley M., 2006, EGC, V2006, P5 Sidiropoulos Antonis, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V72, P253 Vercoustre Anne-Marie, 2008, APPLIED COMPUTING 2008, VOLS 1-323rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, MAR 16-20, 2008, Fortaleza, BRAZIL, P1101 Rendle S., 2010, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, P811 Ley M., 2009, PVLDB, V2, P1493 Cronin B, 2001, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCEConference on Freedom of Information: The Impact of Open Access on Biomedical Science, JUL 06-07, 2000, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, V27, P1 Freudenthaler C., 2011, Proceedings of ICNAAM, P405 Furukawa T., 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, P1741 Nie Z., 2005, Study of the eXplicit Control Protocol (XCP), ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337496800009 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Core research areas on addiction in Spain through the Web of Science *bibliographic* coupling analysis (2000-2013) Authors: Gonzalez-Alcaide, G; Calafat, A; Becona, E Author Full Names: Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio; Calafat, Amador; Becona, Elisardo Source: ADICCIONES, 26 (2):168-183; 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliometrics, addiction, research areas, bibliographic coupling, intellectual structure KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH-FRONT; CITATION; DOCUMENTS; COCITATION; FIELD Abstract: The present study identifies the main Spanish core research areas in the area of addictions through the *bibliographic* coupling analysis of the publications at the Web of Science under the substance abuse heading. The *bibliographic* coupling methodology is the analytical procedure that determines the thematic-intellectual proximity of the documents under consideration through the identification of the shared or simultaneously cited bibliography by those documents. A factor analysis and network analysis have been carried out to cluster documents, graphically represent the existing core research areas, and analyse the interrelations between them. We have identified 30 core research areas. Alcohol is the topic of attention of 17 areas and cocaine has a strong presence in 6. Heroin and opiates are only present as prominent substances in 4 areas and cannabis and tobacco in other two for each substance. It has been found that there is a significant degree of fragmentation in the area, with the existence of numerous research foci but with few connections with each other and few documents showing shared common knowledge. Also noteworthy is the large number of emerging research areas, reflecting an incipient stage in many of the research topics. Consideration must be placed in promoting scientific consensus and cohesion of the discipline as well as to encouraging the consolidation of main lines that respond to the social problems and research challenges. Addresses: [Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio] Univ Valencia, Dept Hist Ciencia & Documentac, Valencia 46010, Spain. [Calafat, Amador; Becona, Elisardo] European Inst Studies Prevent IREFREA, Palma De Mallorca, Spain. [Becona, Elisardo] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Psicol Clin & Psicobiol, Santiago De Compostela, Spain. E-mail Addresses: gregorio.gonzalez at uv.es Cited Reference Count: 41 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SOCIDROGALCOHOL, RAMBLA 15, 2A, 3A,, PALMA DE MALLORCA, BALEARES 07003, SPAIN ISSN: 0214-4840 Web of Science Categories: Substance Abuse; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, SCI; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, SSCI Research Areas: Substance Abuse IDS Number: AJ2OI Unique ID: WOS:000337496800009 Cited References: Jarneving B, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P245 Gonz?lez-Alcaide Gregorio, 2007, Adicciones, V19, P45 Aleixandre-Benavent R., 2012, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, V35, P94 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P1721 MacRoberts MH, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P435 Belles A., 2006, Adicciones, V18, P119 Youtie Jan, 2013, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V22, P145 De Granda-Orive J. I., 2009, Gaceta Sanitaria, V23, Yuan Y., 2014, International Journal of Tourism Research, Osca Lluch J., 2012, Revista Espanola de Drogodependencias, V37, P9 Culebras-Fernandez J., 2008, NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, V23, P85 Jarneving B., 2013, Proceedings of the ISSI 2013 Viena. 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 15th to 19th July, 2013, Viena, Austria, P955 Meyer M., 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P473 Jarneving B, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V50, P365 Garcia Lopez J. A., 1999, European Journal of Epidemiology, V15, P23 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Jarneving B., 2007, Journal of Informetrics, V1, P338 Boyack Kevin W., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2389 Small Henry, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P332 Arciniega LT, 1997, ADDICTION, V92, P1639 Jarneving Bo, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P287 Calafat A., 2006, Addiction, V101, P638 Gonzalez-Alcaide G., 2006, Trastornos Adictivos, V8, P78 Gonzalez-Alcaide G., 2008, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Gientifica, V31, P344 Glanzel W, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P195 Czerwon H. J., 1995, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, P167 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Upham S. Phineas, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P15 Castellano-Gomez M., 2003, Adicciones, V15, P309 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V91, P399 Gonzalez Alcaide Gregorio, 2008, Adicciones, V20, P337 Long Janet C., 2012, BMJ OPEN, V2, Arbinaga F., 2002, Adicciones, V14, P139 Boyack Kevin W., 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P670 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 LIU MX, 1993, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V49, P370 Vogel Rick, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, V15, P426 Sanchez-Carbonell X, 2005, ADDICTION, V100, P1166 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P276 Echeburua Enrique, 2010, ADICCIONES, V22, P91 Kuusi Osmo, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P759 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337302600013 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Author Name Disambiguation by Using Deep Neural Network Authors: Tran, HN; Huynh, T; Do, T Author Full Names: Hung Nghiep Tran; Tin Huynh; Tien Do Editor(s): Nguyen NT; Attachoo B; Trawinski B; Somboonviwat K Source: INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS, PT 1, 8397 123-132; 2014 Book Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 6th Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS) Conference Date: APR 07-09, 2014 Conference Location: Bangkok, THAILAND Conference Sponsors: King Mongkuts Inst Technol Ladkrabang, Wroclaw Univ Technol, IEEE SMC Tech Comm Computat Collect Intelligence, Hue Univ, Univ Informat Technol HCM, Quang Binh Univ Author Keywords: Digital Library, Bibliographic Data, Author Name Disambiguation, Machine Learning, Feature Learning, Deep Neural Network Abstract: Author name ambiguity is one of the problems that decrease the quality and reliability of information retrieved from digital libraries. Existing methods have tried to solve this problem by predefining a feature set based on expert's knowledge for a specific dataset. In this paper, we propose a new approach which uses deep neural network to learn features automatically for solving author name ambiguity. Additionally, we propose the general system architecture for author name disambiguation on any dataset. We evaluate the proposed method on a dataset containing Vietnamese author names. The results show that this method significantly outperforms other methods that use predefined feature set. The proposed method achieves 99.31% in terms of accuracy. Prediction error rate decreases from 1.83% to 0.69%, i.e., it decreases by 1.14%, or 62.3% relatively compared with other methods that use predefined feature set (Table 3). Addresses: [Hung Nghiep Tran; Tin Huynh; Tien Do] Univ Informat Technol Vietnam, Linh Trung Ward, Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. E-mail Addresses: nghiepth at uit.edu.vn; tinhn at uit.edu.vn; tiendv at uit.edu.vn Cited Reference Count: 15 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 0302-9743 ISBN: 978-3-319-05476-6 ISBN: 978-3-319-05475-9 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods Research Areas: Computer Science IDS Number: BA6XT Unique ID: WOS:000337302600013 Cited References: Bilenko M, 2003, IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, V18, P16 Torvik V.I., 2009, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, V3, Torvik VI, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V56, P140 Huynh T., 2013, ACIIDS 2013, V7802, P226 Ranzato M., 2007, NIPS, Glorot X., 2011, AISTATS, P315 Ciresan Dan, 2012, 2012 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR)IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), JUN 16-21, 2012, Providence, RI, P3642 Ferreira Anderson A., 2012, SIGMOD RECORD, V41, P15 Glorot X., 2010, JLMR - Proceedings Track, V9, P249 Rumelhart D.E., 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Mi-crostructure of Cognition, V1, P318 Hinton Geoffrey E., 2006, NEURAL COMPUTATION, V18, P1527 Yu D., 2013, CoRR abs/1301.3605, Bhattacharya I., 2007, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, V1, Cohen W.W., 2003, IIWeb, P73 Krizhevsky A., 2012, NIPS, V25, P1106 ======================================================================== *Record 33 of 36. Search terms matched: CITED(1) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337286600001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The most *cited* Activity of 38(th) Years Psychiatric Practice - Hearty Congratulations! Authors: Riedel-Heller, SG Author Full Names: Riedel-Heller, Steffi G. Source: PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, 41 (1):7-7; 10.1055/s-0033-1359977 JAN 2014 Language: German Document Type: Editorial Material KeyWords Plus: GERMANY Addresses: Univ Leipzig, Inst Sozialmed Arbeitsmed & Publ Hlth ISAP, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. E-mail Addresses: Steffi.Riedel-Heller at medizin.uni-leipzig.de Cited Reference Count: 7 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG, RUDIGERSTR 14, D-70469 STUTTGART, GERMANY ISSN: 0303-4259 Web of Science Categories: Psychiatry; PSYCHIATRY, SSCI Research Areas: Psychiatry IDS Number: AI9UT Unique ID: WOS:000337286600001 Cited References: Zinkler Martin, 2013, PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, V40, P115 Pfennig Andrea, 2011, PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, V38, P218 Lehnert Thomas, 2011, PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, V38, P369 Becker Thomas, 2012, PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, V39, P365 Steinert Tilman, 2011, PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, V38, P348 Guehne Uta, 2011, PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, V38, P114 Maske Ulrike E., 2013, PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, V40, P207 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337240900008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English Authors: van Heuven, WJB; Mandera, P; Keuleers, E; Brysbaert, M Author Full Names: van Heuven, Walter J. B.; Mandera, Pawel; Keuleers, Emmanuel; Brysbaert, Marc Source: QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 67 (6):1176-1190; 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Word frequency, Visual word recognition, Zipf scale KeyWords Plus: LEXICAL DECISION DATA; FILM SUBTITLES; CONTEXTUAL DIVERSITY; ACQUISITION; PROJECT; AGE; IDENTIFICATION; CHOICE; NORMS; TIMES Abstract: We present word frequencies based on subtitles of British television programmes. We show that the SUBTLEX-UK word frequencies explain more of the variance in the lexical decision times of the British Lexicon Project than the word frequencies based on the British National Corpus and the SUBTLEX-US frequencies. In addition to the word form frequencies, we also present measures of contextual diversity part-of-speech specific word frequencies, word frequencies in children programmes, and word bigram frequencies, giving researchers of British English access to the full range of norms recently made available for other languages. Finally, we introduce a new measure of word frequency, the *Zipf* scale, which we hope will stop the current misunderstandings of the word frequency effect. Addresses: [van Heuven, Walter J. B.] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England. [Mandera, Pawel; Keuleers, Emmanuel; Brysbaert, Marc] Univ Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. [Brysbaert, Marc] Swansea Univ, Swansea, W Glam, Wales. E-mail Addresses: walter.vanheuven at nottingham.ac.uk Cited Reference Count: 37 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 1747-0218 Web of Science Categories: Psychology, Biological; Physiology; Psychology; Psychology, Experimental; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Research Areas: Psychology; Physiology IDS Number: AI9GO Unique ID: WOS:000337240900008 Cited References: Kuperman Victor, 2013, LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, V28, P939 The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group, Stanford Log-linear Part-Of-Speech Tagger, Brysbaert Marc, 2011, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, V64, P545 STEIGER JH, 1980, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, V87, P245 Kuperman Victor, 2012, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V44, P978 MONSELL S, 1989, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, V118, P43 Masterson Jackie, 2010, BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, V101, P221 Dimitropoulou M., 2010, Frontiers in Psychology, V1, P1 Cuetos Fernando, 2011, PSICOLOGICA, V32, P133 Perea Manuel, 2013, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, V116, P37 Arnon Inbal, 2010, JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, V62, P67 Brysbaert Marc, 2012, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V44, P991 Brysbaert Marc, 2009, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V41, P977 New Boris, 2007, APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, V28, P661 Kilgarriff A., 2006, BNC database and word frequency lists, Minnen G., 2001, Natural Language Engineering, V7, P207 Balota David A., 2007, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V39, P445 Brysbaert Marc, 2013, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V45, P422 Lancaster University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language, CLAWS part-of-speech tagger for English, Baayen R. Harald, 2011, PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, V118, P438 Brysbaert Marc, 2011, EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, V58, P412 Smith N., 1997, Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora, P102 Brysbaert Marc, 2011, FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, V2, Zipf G.K., 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least-Effort, Siyanova-Chanturia Anna, 2011, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, V37, P776 Toutanova K., 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics on human language technology, V1, P173 Ferrand Ludovic, 2010, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V42, P488 Keuleers Emmanuel, 2010, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V42, P643 Adelman James S., 2008, PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, V115, P214 Cai Qing, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Kucera H., 1967, Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English, Baayen R. H., 1995, The CELEX lexical database, MORRISON CM, 1995, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, V21, P116 Lete Bernard, 2013, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, V66, P973 Adelman James S., 2006, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V17, P814 Keuleers Emmanuel, 2012, BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, V44, P287 Yap Melvin J., 2011, PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, V18, P742 ======================================================================== *Record 36 of 36. Search terms matched: ZIPF-LIKE(2) *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337326800004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A study of hotspot data prediction model in I/O workloads Authors: Yang, Y; Tan, ZH; Xie, CS; Liang, W; Yu, J; He, J Author Full Names: Yang, Yin; Tan, Zhihu; Xie, Changsheng; Liang, Wei; Yu, Jie; He, Jian Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 91 (3):403-433; 10.1080/00207160.2013.804512 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: hotspot data, parameter estimation, prediction model, Zipf-like distribution, I/O workloads Abstract: There is a notable characteristic of the data access pattern: 80% I/O requests only access 20% data. This feature brings about the concept of hotspot data, which refer to the data in the most frequent requested area. The access to these hotspot data has direct influence upon the performance of the storage system's applications. Therefore, how to predict hotspot data is a critical research focus in the optimization of the storage system. In this paper, we propose a hotspot data prediction model based on a *Zipf-like* distribution, which can estimate and dynamically adjust parameters according to the present statistics of I/O access. We classify the hotspot data from every trace, and analyse the prediction rate through the classified hotspot data's characteristic. We synthesize the analysis results in different time granularities and hotspot data prediction queue lengths. Finally, we use block I/O traces to discuss the effectiveness of this model. The discussion and analysis results indicate that this model can predict the hotspot data efficiently. Addresses: [Yang, Yin; Tan, Zhihu; Xie, Changsheng; Yu, Jie; He, Jian] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China. [Yang, Yin; Tan, Zhihu; Xie, Changsheng] Wuhan Natl Lab Optoelect, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China. [Liang, Wei] 722 Inst China Shipbldg Ind Corp, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: stan at mail.hust.edu.cn Funding Acknowledgement: National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB302303]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [60933002]; HUST Fund [2011QN053, 2011QN032]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Funding Text: The authors wish to thank referees for their constructive comments and recommendations which have significantly improved the presentation of this paper. This work is sponsored in part by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under Grant No. 2011CB302303 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 60933002, and the HUST Fund under Grant Nos 2011QN053 and 2011QN032, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Cited Reference Count: 43 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND ISSN: 0020-7160 Web of Science Categories: Mathematics, Applied; MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Research Areas: Mathematics IDS Number: AJ0FX Unique ID: WOS:000337326800004 Cited References: Gomez M.E., 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, San Diego, CA, Kaushik R.T., 2010, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Power Aware Computing and Systems, CA, Chesire M., 2001, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, San Francisco, CA, Joos Martin, 1936, LANGUAGE, V12, P196 Arlitt M., 1996, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, Philadelphia, PA, Wilkes J., 1995, Proceedings of 15th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Colombia, Tang Zhanghong, 2012, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS PACKAGING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, V2, P1659 Breslau L., 1999, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, New York, Iamnitchi A., 2004, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Hong Kong, China, Duo D., 2011, Proceedings of the 48th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference, San Diego, CA, Li Nan, 2010, DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, V48, P354 Shi C.L., 2011, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Shanghai, China, CHEN YS, 1992, COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, V24, P77 Agrawal A., 2011, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Devi K.N., 2012, Journal of Computer Science, V8, Kakoulli Elena, 2012, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, V31, P418 UMass Trace Repository, OLTP Application I/O and Search Engine I/O, Zhang S.L., 2012, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security, Nanjing, China, Cherkasova L, 2004, IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, V12, P781 Brown A., 1999, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating System, Rio Rico, AZ, Jin S., 2001, ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluat. Rev., V29, P2 Sikalinda P.G., 2006, Tech. Rep. CS06-02-00, Wuu J.Y., 2011, Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, Santa Clara, CA, BOOTH AD, 1967, INFORMATION AND CONTROL, V10, P386 Zipf G.K., 1965, The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology Houghton Mifflin Company, Cherkasova L., 2000, Tech. Rep. HPL-2000-82, Zipf G.K., 1932, Selective Studies and the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language, Griwodz C., 1997, Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Seattle, WA, Duo Ding, 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, V30, Roselli D., 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, San Diego, CA, Chervenak A., 1995, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, San Francisco, CA, Tian L., 2007, Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, San Jose, CA, Carrera E.V., 2004, Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, Madrid, Spain, Narayanan D., 2008, Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, San Diego, CA, Hsieh J., 2006, ACM Trans. Storage, V2, P22 Amiri Z., 2011, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Information Management, Australia, Zipf G.K., 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least-Effort, NUSSBAUMER JP, 1995, IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, V13, P779 Preethi T., 2012, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, Tamil Nadu, India, Yu H., 2006, Proceedings of 1st ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems, Leuven, Belgium, Repantis T., 2008, Proceedings of the 38th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Anchorage, Alaska, Serpanos D., 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, New York, Kucera H., 1967, Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English, ======================================================================= Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):189-202; 10.1007/s11192-013-1189-z JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric, Research trend, Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket/bed (UASB), Word cluster analysis KeyWords Plus: WASTE-WATER; GRANULAR SLUDGE; REACTORS; PERFORMANCE; DIGESTION; PHENOL; TRENDS Abstract: Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket/bed (UASB) has been recognized as a robust technology arousing wide concern in wastewater treatment research recently. In this study, a bibliometric analysis was performed to evaluate the publications on UASB research from 1983 to 2012, based on the Science Citation Index databases. It was identified that a total of 2363 UASB-related outputs were published in 220 journals over the past 30 years. Results showed that China and Indian Institute of Technology in India came as the most productive country and institute publishing most articles on UASB, respectively. The most productive field of "wastewater treatment" would still maintain the leading role as to provide a good reference on the UASB research in the future. Besides, the performance improving approaches and practical applications of the UASB would probably continue as the two main developing orientations. This study is to serve as an alternative and innovative way of revealing the research trends in UASB. Addresses: [Zhang, Baogang; Liu, Ye; Tian, Caixing; Wang, Zhijun; Cheng, Ming; Chen, Nan; Feng, Chuanping] China Univ Geosci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Groundwater Circulat & Evolut, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China. [Zhang, Baogang; Liu, Ye; Tian, Caixing; Wang, Zhijun; Cheng, Ming; Chen, Nan; Feng, Chuanping] China Univ Geosci, Sch Water Resources & Environm, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: zbgcugb at gmail.com Funding Acknowledgement: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21307117]; Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120022120005]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652011263] Funding Text: This research work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) as a young scholar project (No. 21307117), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20120022120005) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2652011263). Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300009 Cited References: Lv Peng Hui, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P399 Huang Wenli, 2012, DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, V50, P67 Ericksen Polly J., 2009, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, V12, P373 Lakaniemi Aino-Maija, 2013, BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, V135, P222 Jeganathan Jeganaesan, 2006, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, V40, P6466 Fang HHP, 1996, WATER RESEARCH, V30, P1353 Z Ye, 2013, Desalination and Water Treatment, Ito T, 2005, JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, V100, P260 van der Zee FP, 2001, CHEMOSPHERE, V44, P1169 Tang Chong-Jian, 2011, WATER RESEARCH, V45, P135 Chang FY, 2004, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, V29, P33 LETTINGA G, 1980, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, V22, P699 Sondhi Akash, 2010, WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, V82, P715 Yang Lie, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P133 Najafpour GD, 2006, PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, V41, P370 Veeresh GS, 2005, WATER RESEARCH, V39, P154 Sekiguchi Y, 1999, APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, V65, P1280 Cronin B, 2001, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCEConference on Freedom of Information: The Impact of Open Access on Biomedical Science, JUL 06-07, 2000, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, V27, P1 Chiu Wen-Ta, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V73, P3 POL LWH, 1983, WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V15, P291 Wang Haijun, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P35 Mao Ning, 2010, HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, V16, P801 Seghezzo L, 1998, BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, V65, P175 Zhang Baogang, 2009, BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, V100, P5687 Li Jinfeng, 2011, GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, V77, P13 Miron Y, 2000, WATER RESEARCH, V34, P1705 ________________________________ ________________________________ *Record 3 of 9. Search terms matched: SCIENTOMETRIC(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Scientometric sorting by importance for literatures on life cycle assessments and some related methodological discussions Authors: Qian, G Author Full Names: Qian, Ge Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 19 (7):1462-1467; 10.1007/s11367-014-0747-9 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Betweenness centrality metric, Citation frequency, CiteSpace II, Document co-citation analysis, Life cycle assessments, Scientometric method KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH FIELD; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; COCITATION; VISUALIZATION; SCIENCE Abstract: This paper aims to sort the literatures on life cycle assessments (LCA) by their respective importance through citation and co-citation analysis and to further discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these kinds of scientometric methods in the case of LCA research. CiteSpace II was used to generate document co-citation networks based on 3,824 articles retrieved from the ISI Web of Science database on this topic. Table 1 provides the top 50 highest cited documents in the LCA field. Here, we use two indicators, i.e., citation frequency in citation analysis and betweenness centrality metric in co-citation analysis, to measure the importance of these LCA literatures. Citation and co-citation analysis are useful for environmental scientists and engineers to get a better understanding of the inner structure of LCA research. However, like all other research methods, this kind of analysis has some limitations. On the one hand, Scientometric studies and related software are very dependent on ISI Web of Science database, but considering the ISI Web of Science only began to track the LCA field fairly recently, the Scopus database would probably give a fuller picture. On the other hand, since the essence of scientometrics analysis is outsiders commenting insiders, so with only citation and co-citation analysis, to our understanding of the past, present, and future of LCA field, is insufficient. Addresses: Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Theoret Teaching & Res Dept, Humanities Coll, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: qiange at mail.shufe.edu.cn Funding Acknowledgement: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics) [2012110044] Funding Text: This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No. 2012110044). The author is very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors of the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment for their valuable comments and advices. Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY ISSN: 0948-3349 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Research Areas: Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology IDS Number: AI8IT Unique ID: WOS:000337157100007 Cited References: SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 Klopffer W, 2002, Int J Life Cycle Assess, V7, P311 Ahlgren P, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P550 Leydesdorff Loet, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V58, P25 Qian Ge, 2013, CURRENT SCIENCE, V105, P1666 Newton I, 1965, On the shoulders of giants, Qian Ge, 2012, DISASTER ADVANCES, V5, P704 Cobo M. J., 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P146 Leydesdorff Loet, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P1616 MALIN MV, 1968, LIBRARY TRENDS, V16, P374 Small HG, 1984, Scientometrics, V7, P391 SMITH LC, 1981, LIBRARY TRENDS, V30, P83 BROOKS TA, 1986, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V37, P34 Freidberg Susanne, 2013, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, V42, P571 Hunt RG, 1996, Int J Life Cycle Assess, V1, P4 Qian Ge, 2013, JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGYInternational Conference on Agricultural, Food and Biological Engineering (ICAFBE), 2012, Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA, V7, P305 Garfield E, 1965, Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, Narin F, 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, SMALL H, 1980, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V36, P183 WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 Baumann H, 2002, J Ind Ecol, V6, P13 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V1, P215 SMALL H, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICSEUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON SCIENTOMETRIC METHODS OF RESEARCH EVALUATION IN THE SCIENCES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, APR 13-17, 1991, POTSDAM, GERMANY, V26, P5 Baumann H, 2002, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, V7, P2 ________________________________ *Record 4 of 9. Search terms matched: BIBLIOMETRIC(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Phases of growth in a green tech research network: a bibliometric evaluation of fuel cell technology from 1991 to 2010 Authors: Suominen, A Author Full Names: Suominen, Arho Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):51-72; 10.1007/s11192-014-1285-8 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometrics, Fuel cell, Research networks KeyWords Plus: EUROPEAN PUBLIC RESEARCH; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; HYDROGEN; INDICATORS; IMPACT Abstract: This study uncovers the evolution of a fuel cell research network through a bibliometric study focusing on a period from 1991 to 2010. From a dataset of 37,435 research articles, the study focuses on the evolution of fuel cell research networks at a national level. Focusing solely on the expansion of the research networks, and the policies effecting collaboration, the paper poses three research questions (1) Is research into fuel cells more unconcentrated than in science overall and if so, (2) is there changes within time and (3) can we identify a cluster among certain countries. To answer the research questions, the data was compared to findings on the overall scientific output worldwide. In addition, an ego network analysis was performed and a modularity algorithm was used in order to identify clusters from the network data. The study showed that fuel cell research co-operation has had a distinct evolution within the time frame of the study. Research has increased in both volume and in co-operation, but research co-operation is more unconcentrated than in science overall. Non-TRIAD countries have a stronger role in fuel cell research than in science overall. Clusters in research co-operation have evolved into two modes of co-operation-one around Asia and North America and the second around European co-operation with US and Asia. Addresses: VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Turku 20521, Finland. E-mail Addresses: arho.suominen at fulbrightmail.org Funding Acknowledgement: Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation funded project Co-evolution of knowledge creation systems and innovation pipelines (CEK) Funding Text: The author would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Dr. Hannes Toivanen and anonymous reviewers. This work has been partly supported by the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation funded project Co-evolution of knowledge creation systems and innovation pipelines (CEK). Cited Reference Count: 50 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300003 Cited References: Veugelers Reinhilde, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P439 Fuel Cells Bulletin, 2002, Portable fuel cell systems, V2002, P8 [Anonymous], 2007, Fuel Cells Bulletin, V2007, P9 Glanzel W, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P69 [Anonymous], 2007, Fuel Cells Bulletin, V2007, P3 Glanzel W., 2005, P257 Anadon Laura Diaz, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P1742 Melin G, 1999, SCIENTOMETRICS, V46, P161 Solomon BD, 2006, ENERGY POLICY, V34, P781 Lv Peng Hui, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P399 Zhang Gangfeng, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P477 European Commission, 2003, Tech. Rep. EUR 20025 EN, Blondel Vincent D., 2008, JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, Seymour E. Hugo, 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, V33, P1457 Persson O., 2009, Elebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, P9 Suominen A., 2011, International Journal of Strategic Change Management, V3, Fch J. U., 2011, Fuel cells and hydrogen-Joint undertaking-European commission, fuel cell and hydrogen joint undertaking (fch ju), Lee S, 2005, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V35, P673 Katz JS, 1997, RESEARCH POLICY, V26, P1 Chao Chia-Chen, 2007, TECHNOVATION, V27, P268 Suominen A., 2014, Foresight, V16, Kurzweil P., 2009, Encyclopedia of electrochemical power sources, P579 Seymour E. Hugo, 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, V32, P3212 Cropper MAJ, 2004, JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES8th Grove Fuel Cell Symposium, SEP 24-26, 2003, London, ENGLAND, V131, P57 Hellman Hanna L., 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, V32, P305 [Anonymous], 2007, Fuel Cells Bulletin, V2007, P7 Wald M.L., 2009, The New York Times, Ho Yuh-Shan, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P929 Shin S. C., 2003, OECD conference on the innovation of energy technologies OECD conference on the innovation of energy yechnologies, Washington D.C, Toivanen Hannes, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P471 Ho Yuh-Shan, 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P725 Ruef Annette, 2010, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V22, P317 Budde Bjoern, 2012, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V79, P1072 Bakker Sjoerd, 2010, ENERGY POLICY, V38, P6540 Suominen A., 2010, Journal of Business Chemistry, V7, P117 [Anonymous], 2003, Fuel Cells Bulletin, V2003, P2 Li Ling-li, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P39 Laudel G, 2002, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V11, P3 Wang Haijun, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P35 Tang Li, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V88, P1 [Anonymous], 2007, Fuel Cells Bulletin, V2007, P5 Curtin S., 2010, Fuel Cells, V2000, Everett M, 2005, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V27, P31 Archambault E., 2012, Scale-adjusted metrics of scientific collaboration, Wagner C.S., 2001, No. RAND/MR-1357.0-WB, Hanneman R. A., 2005, Introduction to social network methods, Haslam Gareth E., 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, V37, P14612 Wee J., 2006, textitJournal of Power Sources, V3, P238 Liu Xingjian, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P747 Fuel Cells Bulletin, 2003, Polyfuel unveils dmfc prototype at intel forum, V2003, P5 ________________________________ *Record 5 of 9. Search terms matched: CITATIONS(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling Network Effects on Citations Authors: Biscaro, C; Giupponi, C Author Full Names: Biscaro, Claudio; Giupponi, Carlo Source: PLOS ONE, 9 (6):10.1371/journal.pone.0099502 JUN 9 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; PRODUCTIVITY; CREATIVITY; INNOVATION; MODELS; GROWTH Abstract: This paper analyzes the effects of the co-authorship and bibliographic coupling networks on the citations received by scientific articles. It expands prior research that limited its focus on the position of co-authors and incorporates the effects of the use of knowledge sources within articles: references. By creating a network on the basis of shared references, we propose a way to understand whether an article bridges among extant strands of literature and infer the size of its research community and its embeddedness. Thus, we map onto the article - our unit of analysis - the metrics of authors' position in the co-authorship network and of the use of knowledge on which the scientific article is grounded. Specifically, we adopt centrality measures - degree, betweenneess, and closeness centrality - in the co-authorship network and degree, betweenness centrality and clustering coefficient in the bibliographic coupling and show their influence on the citations received in first two years after the year of publication. Findings show that authors' degree positively impacts citations. Also closeness centrality has a positive effect manifested only when the giant component is relevant. Author's betweenness centrality has instead a negative effect that persists until the giant component - largest component of the network in which all nodes can be linked by a path - is relevant. Moreover, articles that draw on fragmented strands of literature tend to be cited more, whereas the size of the scientific research community and the embeddedness of the article in a cohesive cluster of literature have no effect. Addresses: [Biscaro, Claudio; Giupponi, Carlo] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, Venice, Italy. [Biscaro, Claudio] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Management, Venice, Italy. [Biscaro, Claudio] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Org & Globale Managementstudien, A-4040 Linz, Austria. E-mail Addresses: claudio.biscaro at jku.at Funding Acknowledgement: KULTURisk Project [FP7-ENV.2010.1.3.2-1-265280] Funding Text: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the KULTURisk Project (FP7-ENV.2010.1.3.2-1-265280). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Cited Reference Count: 45 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA ISSN: 1932-6203 Article Number: e99502 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences; MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AI8LF Unique ID: WOS:000337165600095 Cited References: Janssen Marco A., 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONSWorkshop on Vulnerability, Resilience and Adaptation, FEB, 2005, Tempe, AZ, V16, P240 Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 Simonton DK, 1995, The nature of insight, P465 Mazloumian A, 2011, Plos One, V6, Blei David M., 2007, ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, V1, P17 Uddin Shahadat, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P687 Polanyi M, 2000, MINERVA, V38, P1 Wallace Matthew L., 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Larsen Peder Olesen, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P575 Newman MEJ, 2009, Epl, V86, Newman M. E. J., 2010, Networks-An Introduction, Hargadon A, 1997, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V42, P716 Yin Li-chun, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1599 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 Jose AM, 1996, WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTIONRegional Workshop on Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Asia and the Pacific, JAN 15-19, 1996, MANILA, PHILIPPINES, V92, P191 Moretti E, 2012, The new geography of jobs: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, SIMON HA, 1973, AMERICAN SCIENTIST, V61, P394 Blei David M., 2012, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, V55, P77 Schilling MA, 2005, CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, V17, P131 Sun XL, 2013, Scientific Reports, V3, Kaplan S, 2012, Economic, Goh KI, 2003, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V67, Yan Erjia, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P2107 Turner BL, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V100, P8074 Chang Jonathan, 2010, ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, V4, P124 Adger W. Neil, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONSWorkshop on Vulnerability, Resilience and Adaptation, FEB, 2005, Tempe, AZ, V16, P268 Dekas Kathryn H., 2013, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, V27, P219 Csardi G, 2006, InterJournal, Complex Systems, V1695, Dorta-Gonzalez P., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P593 Burt RS, 2004, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V110, P349 Heinze Thomas, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P811 Uddin S, 2013, Plos One, V8, Simonton DK, 1999, PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, V10, P309 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 Catmull E, 2008, How Pixar fosters collective creativity, Perry-Smith JE, 2006, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V49, P85 Janssen MA, 2007, Ecology and Society, V12, Frigotto M. Laura, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P397 Bettencourt Luis M. A., 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P7301 Ioannidis John P. A., 2006, PLOS ONE, V1, Newman MEJ, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V98, P404 Blei DM, 2003, JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH18th International Conference on Machine Learning, JUN 28-JUL 01, 2001, WILLIAMSTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, V3, P993 Strzepek KM, 1996, CLIMATE RESEARCHWorkshop on Vulnerability and Adaptation of African Ecosystems to Global Climate Change, MAR 07-15, 1995, HARARE, ZIMBABWE, V6, P89 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Maske KL, 2003, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V41, P555 ________________________________ . ________________________________ * *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Comparison of Faculty and Bibliometric Valuation of Serials Subscriptions at an Academic Research Library Authors: Knowlton, SA; Sales, AC; Merriman, KW Author Full Names: Knowlton, Steven A.; Sales, Adam C.; Merriman, Kevin W. Source: SERIALS REVIEW, 40 (1):28-39; 10.1080/00987913.2014.897174 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: serials cancellations, bibliometrics, faculty selectors, collection assessment KeyWords Plus: BOOK SELECTION; CANCELLATION; STATISTICS Abstract: Despite their professional training and study in the development of research collections in academic settings, librarians often consult with or even defer to faculty in selecting materials. Faculty often use various methods of evaluation that tend to emphasize qualitative data or even anecdotal evidence. Bibliometric analysis offers emerging tools to quantify these decisions, reflecting fundamental principles of library science. This study compares faculty choices of serials subscription cancellations to the choices that would have been predicted using a bibliometric tool, the California Digital Library Weighted Value Algorithm (CDL-WVA). Faculty choices differed significantly from the decisions predicted by CDL-WVA. However, as the bibliometric score increased, so did the rate of match between faculty choice and decisions predicted by CDL-WVA. Implications of these findings for collection development are discussed. Addresses: [Knowlton, Steven A.; Merriman, Kevin W.] Univ Memphis, Univ Lib, Memphis, TN 38152 USA. [Sales, Adam C.] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Stat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA. E-mail Addresses: steven.knowlton at memphis.edu Cited Reference Count: 41 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 0098-7913 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science; INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI9GT Unique ID: WOS:000337241600005 Cited References: Budd J., 2005, The changing academic library: Operations, culture, environments, Clement S., 2008, Serials Librarian, V54, Appavoo C., 2013, American Library Association Annual Meeting, June, 2013, Chicago, IL, Trail M., 2013, Serials Librarian, V65, P213 Goldsmith M. U. D., 2012, Codex: The Journal of the Louisiana Chapter of the ACRL, V1, P3 Hanson M., 2010, College & Research Libraries News, V71, P32 BOICE R, 1984, JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, V55, P567 Srivastava S., 2006, Acquisitions Librarian, V18, P149 Lane D. O., 1967, Report #ED 047712, Bingham R. B., 1979, Collection development in university libraries: An investigation of the relationship between categories of selectors and usage of selected items, Carey R., 2005, Collection Management, V30, P59 Bok D., 2006, Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more, KRAFT M, 1967, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V37, P284 LANE DO, 1968, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V29, P364 Chung Hye-Kyung, 2009, LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES, V33, P17 Liao T.-F., 2004, The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, V2, P759 Danton J. P., 1963, Book selection and collections: A comparison of German and American university libraries, Connell T. H., 1991, Collection Management, V14, P73 Wright D. B., 2009, First (and second) steps in statistics, De Groote Sandra L., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V101, P110 Tasasad P. G., 2001, Herald of Library Science, V40, P5 Chrzastowski T.E., 1999, Library Computing, V18, Han S.-K., 2004, The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, V2, P587 Waples D., 1936, National libraries and foreign scholarship, VIDOR DL, 1988, LIBRARY RESOURCES & TECHNICAL SERVICES, V32, P127 EVANS GE, 1970, LIBRARY QUARTERLY, V40, P297 Hannaford W., 1990, Collection Management, V12, P31 Zipf G.K., 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least-Effort, Dewland J., 2011, Technical Services Quarterly, V28, P265 Blecic Deborah D., 2013, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V74, P178 Dickinson D. W., 1981, Collection development for libraries, P214 Chew K., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Library Assessment Conference, Ewing J., 2006, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, P1049 Link Albert N., 2008, ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, V27, P363 MILLSONMARTULA C, 1985, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V46, P504 Charlton T., 2004, The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, V2, P711 Wilson J., 2010, CDLINFO News, Adler Robert, 2009, STATISTICAL SCIENCE, V24, P1 Wilson J., 2012, CDLINFO News, Ladd E. C., 1975, Chronicle of Higher Education, P2 Gallagher J, 2005, LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES, V29, P169 ________________________________ ________________________________ *Record 9 of 9. Search terms matched: CITATIONS(1) *Click Here to View Full Record *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The Authority of Citations and Quotations in Academic Papers Authors: Carrascal, B Author Full Names: Carrascal, Begona Source: INFORMAL LOGIC, 34 (2):167-191; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: act of arguing, argument from expert opinion, authority, citing, communication, testimony KeyWords Plus: EXPERTS Abstract: I consider some uses of citations in academic writing and analyze them as instances of the "appeal to expert opinion" argumentative scheme to show that the critical questions commonly linked to this scheme are difficult to apply. I argue that, by considering citations as special communicative and argumentative situated acts, their use in real practice can be explained more adequately. Adaptation to the audience and to the social constraints is common and necessary in order to collaborate with others and to advance in a discipline, but also to attain rhetorical goals that differ from strictly cognitive ones. Addresses: Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Dept Log & Philosophy Sci, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain. E-mail Addresses: b.carrascal at ehu.es Cited Reference Count: 43 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: UNIV WINDSOR, DEPT PHILOSOPHY, CENTRE RES REASONING ARGUMENTATION RHETORIC, 401 SUNSET AVE, WINDSOR, ONTARIO N9B 3P4, CANADA ISSN: 0824-2577 Web of Science Categories: Logic; Philosophy Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics; Philosophy IDS Number: AJ0XF Unique ID: WOS:000337379100002 Cited References: Sperber D., 2010, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, V1, P583 TYMOCZKO T, 1986, MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCER, V8, P44 Daukas N., 2006, Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, V3, P109 Bondy Patrick, 2010, INFORMAL LOGIC, V30, P263 Tindale Ch, 2007, Fallacies and Argument Appraisal, Origgi G., 2004, Theoria, V61, P35 Hastings A. C., 1963, A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation, Willard C. A., 1990, Informal Logic, V12, P11 Walton Douglas, 2011, INFORMAL LOGIC, V31, P27 Rouse J., 2007, Philosophy of social Sciences, V37, P1 Kauffeld F. J., 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IL at 25 Conference, Houtlosser P., 2005, The Uses of ArgumentProceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, 18-21 May, 2005, P75 Walton D., 1996, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Sperber D., 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Jacobs S., 2000, Argumentation, V14, P261 Brandon R, 1994, Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment., Hardin R., 2002, Trust and Trustworthiness, Adler J., 2012, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), Olmos P., 2007, Informal Logic, V27, P211 Walton D, 2005, ARGUMENTATION METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LAW, P1 Goodwin Jean, 2011, ARGUMENTATION, V25, P285 Johnson R. H., 2005, The uses of argumentProceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18-21 May, 2005, P222 Coady C. A. J., 1992, Testimony: A Philosophical Study, Gelfert Axel, 2011, ARGUMENTATION, V25, P297 Collins Harry, 2011, ARGUMENTATION, V25, P401 Mercier Hugo, 2011, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, V34, P57 Walton D, 2008, ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES, P1 Zenker Frank, 2011, ARGUMENTATION, V25, P355 Lackey J., 2010, Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge, Kvernbekk Tone, 2012, INFORMAL LOGIC, V32, P288 Vasallo N., 2006, Epistemologia, VXXIX, P127 Sperber Dan, 2010, MIND & LANGUAGE, V25, P359 Grice H. P., 1975, Syntax and Semantics: Speech acts, V3, P41 Walton D., 1997, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority, Ruggiero V., 2003, Beyond Feelings: A Guide to Critical Thinking, Goldman AI, 2001, PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, V63, P85 Tindale Ch, 2004, Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice, Steup M., 2010, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Tindale Christopher W., 2011, ARGUMENTATION, V25, P341 Lackey J., 2006, The Epistemology of Testimony, Sperber D., 2001, Philosophical Topics, V29, P401 Lackey J., 2006, The Epistemology of Testimony, P1 Pinto R. C., 2001, Argument, Inference and Dialectic, ============================================================ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE Thu Jul 31 02:34:03 2014 From: lutz.bornmann at GV.MPG.DE (Bornmann, Lutz) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:34:03 +0000 Subject: altmetrics Message-ID: Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics Lutz Bornmann Alternative metrics are currently one of the most popular research topics in scientometric research. This paper provides an overview of research into three of the most important altmetrics: microblogging (Twitter), online reference managers (Mendeley and CiteULike) and blogging. The literature is discussed in relation to the possible use of altmetrics in research evaluation. Since the research was particularly interested in the correlation between altmetrics counts and citation counts, this overview focuses particularly on this correlation. For each altmetric, a meta-analysis is calculated for its correlation with traditional citation counts. As the results of the meta-analyses show, the correlation with traditional citations for micro-blogging counts is negligible (pooled r=0.003), for blog counts it is small (pooled r=0.12) and for bookmark counts from online reference managers, medium to large (CiteULike pooled r=0.23; Mendeley pooled r=0.51). Since the added value of an alternative metric, as an additional metric compared with traditional citation counts, is greater the less it correlates with traditional citation counts, the greatest added value - according to the meta-analysis - is associated with Twitter citations. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.8010 --------------------------------------- Dr. Dr. habil. Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 Munich Tel.: +49 89 2108 1265 Mobil: +49 170 9183667 Email: bornmann at gv.mpg.de WWW: www.lutz-bornmann.de ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-3926-2008 ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lutz_Bornmann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Thu Jul 31 12:30:13 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:30:13 +0000 Subject: Papers of potential interest for readers of the SIG-Metrics List Message-ID: *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337656700020 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Comparative literature study between investigations in foreign Science *Citation* Index *journals* and Chinese core domestic *journals* in the treatment of low back pain with acupuncture Authors: Lin, XJ; Li, R Author Full Names: Lin, Xiangjun; Li, Rui Source: JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 34 (3):373-380; JUN 15 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Low back pain, Journal impact factor, Comparative research KeyWords Plus: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; METAANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS; NECK Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality and methods of clinical research literature published in foreign Science Citation Index (SCI) journals studying the treatment of low back pain with acupuncture. To conduct a comparative study with clinical research literature published in Chinese core domestic journals, and to understand the prospects of current research trends of acupuncture clinical studies in Western countries and China. METHODS: Studies on clinical acupuncture treatment of low back pain in English SCI journals and four Chinese core domestic journals dated from 2002 to 2012 were sourced and summarized for this study. Objective analysis and evaluation on the differences in subject and scope of study on low back pain by foreign and Chinese researchers were conducted. RESULTS: Forty-seven English studies and 115 Chinese studies met our inclusion criteria. A keyword search revealed different kinds of low back pain related conditions in English and Chinese studies. The English studies were broad in scope, while the Chinese studies were more focused. There were also differences in the understanding and definition of concepts and study orientation. CONCLUSION: More study should be undertaken to understand the contradictions that acupuncture faces in view of modern research to further advance the field. (C) 2014 JTCM. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Lin, Xiangjun; Li, Rui] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Acupuncture & Tuina, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: lirui_bucm at 126.com Cited Reference Count: 21 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: JOURNAL TRADITIONAL CHINESE MED, 16 NANXIAOJIE, DONGZHIMEN NEI, BEIJING, 100700, PEOPLES R CHINA ISSN: 0255-2922 eISSN: 1577-7014 IDS Number: AJ4OW Unique ID: WOS:000337656700020 Cited References: Smith LA, 2000, PAIN, V86, P119 Han Ji-Sheng, 2011, NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, V35, P680 Waddell G., 1999, The Back Pain Revolution, P234 Ernst E, 1998, ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V158, P2235 Chou Roger, 2008, Annals of internal medicine, V148, P247 TERRIET G, 1990, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V43, P1191 Zhu FX., 2003, Diseases and disorders that can be treated with acupuncture. Acupuncture: review and analysis of reports on controlled clinical trials, P23 DEYO RA, 1993, SPINE, V18, P2153 Brinkhaus B, 2006, Focus Altern Complement Ther, V11, P286 MATHEW B, 1988, SPINE, V13, P168 Tulder MWv, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V3, Jenkins Hazel, 2002, Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia, V10, P91 Pan YT, 2010, Chinese S&T journal citation reports, P79 White AR, 1999, RHEUMATOLOGY, V38, P143 Park Jongbae, 2008, JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEAnnual Conference of the Society-for-Acupuncture-Research, NOV 09-11, 2007, Baltimore, MD, V14, P871 Dincer F, 2003, COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, V11, P235 Government HM, 2001, Government response to the house of lords select committee on science and technology's report on complementary and alternative medicine, P323 Ahn AC, 2005, ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, V11, P40 Ezzo J, 2000, PAIN, V86, P217 MCCOWIN PR, 1991, ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, V22, P315 vanTulder MW, 1997, SPINE, V22, P427 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337562400006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Patent *citations* and knowledge spillovers: an analysis of Chinese patents registered in the USA Authors: Yu, F; Wu, YR Author Full Names: Yu, Fei; Wu, Yanrui Source: ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 22 (1):86-99; 10.1080/19761597.2014.905229 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: knowledge spillovers, China, patent citations, multinational corporations, count model KeyWords Plus: EXAMINER CITATIONS; DIFFUSION; INVESTMENT; SURGE Abstract: This paper examines US patent citation data and analyses how different firms in China affect knowledge spillovers. Patents granted by the US patent office to applicants located in China are collected along with their citation counts. Two kinds of patent citations, namely citations of previous patents and those of non-patent literature, are used to measure knowledge flows. In the empirical analysis, the negative binomial and zero-inflated count models are considered. The regression results suggest the existence of heterogeneity among firms of different ownership. In terms of knowledge spillovers, the US multinational corporations perform better than those from other western countries; Taiwanese companies outperform their counterparts from Hong Kong and Chinese private corporations contribute more than Chinese state-owned enterprises. These results have important policy implications for the development of a knowledge-intensive economy in China. Addresses: [Yu, Fei] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Social Sci Acad Press, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China. [Wu, Yanrui] Univ Western Australia, Business Sch, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. E-mail Addresses: yanrui.wu at uwa.edu.au Cited Reference Count: 30 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 1976-1597 eISSN: 2158-6721 IDS Number: AJ3JM Unique ID: WOS:000337562400006 Cited References: Criscuolo Paola, 2008, RESEARCH POLICY, V37, P1892 Eaton J, 1999, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, V40, P537 Greene W. H., 1994, V94-10, Sun Y., 2003, World Patent Information, V25, P27 Haruna S., 2010, Journal of Economics and Finance, V34, P365 OECD, 2009, OECD Patent Statistics Manual, Cheung KY, 2004, CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, V15, P25 Iwasa T, 2004, RESEARCH POLICYAnnual Conference of the Japanese-Economic-Association, JUN, 2002, Otaru, JAPAN, V33, P807 Buckley Peter J., 2007, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, V16, P142 Kuo Chun-Chien, 2008, CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, V19, P594 Du L., 2012, Journal of Asian Economics, V23, P234 Lai M., 2008, Multinational Enterprises and Host Economies, V21, P361 Aw Bee Yan, 2008, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, V75, P167 LAMBERT D, 1992, TECHNOMETRICS, V34, P1 Hall B. H., 2002, Patents, Citations and Innovations, P403 Fischer Manfred M., 2009, ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, V43, P839 HAUSMAN J, 1984, ECONOMETRICA, V52, P909 Todo Y., 2009, Journal of Asian Economics, V20, Li Xibao, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P236 HALVORSEN R, 1980, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V70, P474 Keller Wolfgang, 2009, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V91, P821 Spolaore Enrico, 2009, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V124, P469 JAFFE AB, 1993, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V108, P577 Chen J., 2010, Frontiers of Economics in China, V5, P489 Hu Albert Guangzhou, 2010, RESEARCH POLICY, V39, P985 ROMER PM, 1990, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMYCONF ON THE PROBLEM OF DEVELOPMENT, MAY 27-29, 1988, BUFFALO, NY, V98, PS71 Hu Albert Guangzhou, 2009, JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, V90, P57 Branstetter L., 2005, Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, P119 Alcacer Juan, 2006, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V88, P774 MacGarvie M, 2005, ECONOMICS LETTERS, V87, P121 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337562400011 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: 10 years of innovation studies in Asia through the Asian *Journal* of Technology Innovation Authors: Lee, KR Author Full Names: Lee, Kong-Rae Source: ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 22 (1):168-184; 10.1080/19761597.2014.909990 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: AJTI, Asian innovation studies, Asian journal, innovation issues, innovation articles KeyWords Plus: PRODUCT-INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; COUNTRIES; CHINESE; SCIENCE; FIRMS Abstract: Since Asian Journal of Technology Innovation (AJTI) was created in 2004, 10 years have passed and diverse professionals and business experts in the field of technology innovation have involved in the publication of the journal. This paper analyzes the evolution characteristics of AJTI authors and articles like research goals, methodologies, sample sizes and time horizons, innovation research fields and so on over the last 10 years. It was found that nationalities and affiliations of AJTI authors are rapidly being diversified and globalized. AJTI articles increasingly adopt sophisticated research. As result, the sample sizes of AJTI articles are becoming larger and larger including panel data and their time horizons also tend to be longitudinal. We also found that the relative importance of innovation issues in AJTI articles has changed over time following a scholarly trend among innovation studies. Addresses: DGIST, Grad Sch, Dalsung Gun, Daegu, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: leekr at dgist.ac.kr Cited Reference Count: 29 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND ISSN: 1976-1597 eISSN: 2158-6721 IDS Number: AJ3JM Unique ID: WOS:000337562400011 Cited References: Sohn Dong-Won, 2010, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V18, P169 Linstone HA, 1999, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V62, P1 Kim Youngbae, 2010, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V18, P125 McMillan G. S., 2007, R&D Management, V38, P69 Lee C.-H., 2007, Food Science and Industry, V40, P59 Kim Joung-Gun, 2011, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V19, P233 Ball DF, 2006, R & D MANAGEMENT, V36, P205 Han Jung-Hee, 2008, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V16, P47 Fagerberg Jan, 2009, RESEARCH POLICY, V38, P218 Merino T. G., 2006, Technovation, V26, P1303 Lee Voon-Hsien, 2010, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V18, P73 Wang Shuhua, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V73, P331 Biemans Wim, 2007, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V24, P193 Cooper R. G., 1986, Journal of Product Innovation Management, V3, P169 Callon M, 1999, RESEARCH POLICY, V28, P911 INKPEN AC, 1994, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, V25, P703 Seol Sung-Soo, 2010, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V18, P161 Lee Kong-Rae, 2008, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V16, P167 Larson Charles F., 2007, RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V50, P26 Allen TJ, 2004, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V51, P391 Wong Chan-Yuan, 2009, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V17, P75 Cheng CH, 1999, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V46, P4 Lee Yoon-Jun, 2010, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V18, P1 Liu ChenGuang, 2010, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V18, P89 Dong John Qi, 2009, ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, V17, P129 GRIFFIN A, 1993, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V10, P291 Linstone Harold, 2009, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V76, P595 Cetindamar D., 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P45 Lee Y.-J., 2006, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, V16, P187 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337360300006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The prisoners'dilemmas Authorship guidelines and *impact factors*: between a rock and a hard place Authors: Shaw, D Author Full Names: Shaw, David Source: EMBO REPORTS, 15 (6):635-637; 10.1002/embr.201338348 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Addresses: Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth, Basel, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: david.shaw at unibas.ch Cited Reference Count: 4 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 1469-221X eISSN: 1469-3178 IDS Number: AJ0QL Unique ID: WOS:000337360300006 Cited References: Shaw David, 2011, BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V343, Poundstone W, 1993, Prisoner's Dilemma, Svensson Goran, 2010, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, V44, P23 UK Government Select Committee on Science and Technology, 2004, Tenth report, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337559500001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Classic *Citations* in Erectile Dysfunction Authors: Goldstein, I Author Full Names: Goldstein, Irwin Source: JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 11 115-116; 2 SI 10.1111/jsm.12434 MAR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material KeyWords Plus: SILDENAFIL Cited Reference Count: 5 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 1743-6095 eISSN: 1743-6109 IDS Number: AJ3IK Unique ID: WOS:000337559500001 Cited References: Rajfer J, 1998, JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, V159, P1792 Boolell M, 1996, BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, V78, P257 Goldstein I, 1998, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V338, P1397 Boolell M, 1996, International journal of impotence research, V8, P47 Utiger RD, 1998, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V338, P1458 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337623300106 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: *Bibliometric* Analysis of *Journal* of U University Authors: Meng, JZ; Bian, Q Author Full Names: Meng, Jing-zhao; Bian, Qian Book Group Author(s): DEStech Publicat, Inc Source: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, NETWORK SECURITY AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (CNSCE 2014), 607-611; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 1st International Conference on Computer, Network Security and Communication Engineering (CNSCE) Conference Date: FEB 22-23, 2014 Conference Location: Shenzhen, PEOPLES R CHINA Author Keywords: CNKI, Bibliometric study, Journal of U University (Natural Science Edition), Price law Abstract: This paper makes a bibliometric study of 1749 papers about Journal of U University (Natural Science Edition), which were published during 1998-2011 years and covered by CNKI (China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database). Based on the theory of bibliometric, it analyzes the current situation of the journal from the following aspects: author, fund support project, citation and cited etc. Experimental analysis indicates: the yearly number of papers is steady; cooperation rate of writing papers is on rapid growth and the rate is stable at around 95% after 2005; authors' institutions are widely distributed, among which renowned universities makes a considerable proportion. Addresses: [Meng, Jing-zhao; Bian, Qian] HeBei Univ, Coll Math & Comp Sci, Baoding 071002, Hebei, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: mjz_2013 at 163.com; bianqian163 at 163.com Cited Reference Count: 5 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: DESTECH PUBLICATIONS, INC, 439 DUKE STREET, LANCASTER, PA 17602-4967 USA ISBN: 978-1-60595-167-6 IDS Number: BA7LD Unique ID: WOS:000337623300106 Cited References: Yuan Jun-peng, 2010, Advanced course in scientometrics, P63 Gao Fan, 2004, Library and Information Service, V48, P12 Cheng Liang, 2013, Journal of Library and Information Sciences in Agriculture, V25, P61 ???, 2002, ????Information Science, V20, P148 Liu Ning-nan, 2006, Information Science, V24, P215 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337621300141 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Visual Analysis in Astronomy and Astrophysics of Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Based on *Bibliometric* Analysis Authors: He, SY; Wei, R Author Full Names: He, Shuyi; Wei, Ren Book Group Author(s): DEStech Publicat, Inc Source: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, AND INFORMATICS (SPBEI 2013), 1110-1118; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: International Symposium on Signal Processing Biomedical Engineering, and Informatics (SPBEI) Conference Date: DEC 16-18, 2013 Conference Location: Hangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA Conference Sponsors: Hangzhou Normal Univ Abstract: Astronomy and Astrophysics (A&A) is an important subject in basic science. While the quantity and quality of the Science Citation Index Expand Database (SCIE) papers in this field is the most important indicator of its research achievement and development. In this paper, the visualization research combined with bibliometric analysis for SCIE papers is undertaken for one of astronomy institution - Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (ShAO) - to investigate its astronomy domain progress. Combined with the traditional bibliometric analysis for SCIE papers, CitesSpace is adopted to extract the set of words from the papers to make clustering calculations with the numbers of burst terms and keywords. Then the visualizing emerging trends and abrupt changes in the research field of ShAO can be traced by above analysis. The results shows that the research domains of A&A in ShAO have been developing rapidly in recent 10 years, and are mainly centralized in the fields of active galactic nuclei, accretion disks, digital sky survey, large-scale structure of universe and black hole physics. Addresses: [He, Shuyi] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Astron Observ, Shanghai 200030, PA, Peoples R China. Cited Reference Count: 5 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: DESTECH PUBLICATIONS, INC, 439 DUKE STREET, LANCASTER, PA 17602-4967 USA ISBN: 978-1-60595-163-8 IDS Number: BA7KZ Unique ID: WOS:000337621300141 Cited References: Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 Peterson I., 2004, Science News Online, V16, Allendoerfer K, 2005, INFOVIS 05: IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, ProceedingsIEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis 05), OCT 23-25, 2005, Minneapolis, MN, P195 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 Chen C., 1985, arXiv:1002.1985, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337983600004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality Authors: Fleming, PS; Koletsi, D; Seehra, J; Pandis, N Author Full Names: Fleming, Padhraig S.; Koletsi, Despina; Seehra, Jadbinder; Pandis, Nikolaos Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 67 (7):754-759; 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.01.002 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: Review, Methodological quality, AMSTAR, Impact factor, Systematic, Meta-analysis KeyWords Plus: TRIALS Abstract: Objectives: To compare the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) published in high- and low *impact factor* (IF) Core Clinical Journals. In addition, we aimed to record the implementation of aspects of reporting, including Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram,, reasons for study exclusion, and use of recommendations for interventions such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Study Design and Setting: We searched PubMed for systematic reviews published in Core Clinical Journals between July 1 and December 31, 2012. We evaluated the methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Results: Over the 6-month period, 327 interventional systematic reviews were identified with a mean AMSTAR score of 63.3% (standard deviation, 17.1%), when converted to a percentage scale. We identified deficiencies in relation to a number of quality criteria including delineation of excluded studies and assessment of publication bias. We found that SRs published in higher impact journals were undertaken more rigorously with higher percentage AMSTAR scores (per IF unit: beta = 0.68%; 95% confidence interval: 0.32, 1.04; P < 0.001), a discrepancy likely to be particularly relevant when differences in IF are large. Conclusion: Methodological quality of SRs appears to be better in higher impact journals. The overall quality of SRs published in many Core Clinical Journals remains suboptimal. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Fleming, Padhraig S.] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London E1 2AD, England. [Koletsi, Despina] Univ Athens, Dept Orthodont, Athina 10679, Greece. [Seehra, Jadbinder] GKT Dent Inst, Dept Orthodont, London SE5 8QZ, England. [Pandis, Nikolaos] Univ Bern, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail Addresses: padhraig.fleming at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 19 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA ISSN: 0895-4356 eISSN: 1878-5921 Web of Science Categories: Health Care Sciences & Services; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Research Areas: Health Care Sciences & Services; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health IDS Number: AJ8UP Unique ID: WOS:000337983600004 Cited References: Langendam Miranda W, 2013, Systematic reviews, V2, P81 Chalmers I, 1995, Systematic reviews, Kulkarni Abhaya V., 2007, PLOS ONE, V2, Kulkarni Abhaya V., 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Rizkallah Jacques, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Dreyfuss Paul, 2008, EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, V17, P1270 Martel Guillaume, 2012, Systematic reviews, V1, P14 OXMAN AD, 1994, BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V309, P648 Shea BJ, 2007, BMC Med Res Methodol, V15, P7 Fleming Padhraig S., 2013, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, V35, P244 Seglen PO, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P498 Weale Andy R, 2004, BMC medical research methodology, V4, P14 Hind Daniel, 2007, BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, V7, Mulrow C, 1998, Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions, P1 Monasta L., 2010, OBESITY REVIEWS, V11, P695 Marashi SA, 2005, MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, V65, P822 Brito Juan P., 2013, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V66, P633 SACKS HS, 1987, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V316, P450 Bala Malgorzata M., 2013, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V66, P286 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337990900006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Pathological publishing: A new psychological disorder with legal consequences? Authors: Buela-Casal, G Author Full Names: Buela-Casal, Gualberto Source: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED TO LEGAL CONTEXT, 6 (2):91-97; 10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.005 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Pathological publishing, Psychological disorder, Scientific fraud, Scientific misconduct, Research misconduct, Research malpractice, Legal and ethical consequences KeyWords Plus: IMPACT FACTOR; SCIENCE; SCIENTISTS; ADDICTION; QUALITY; REPLICABILITY; PERFORMANCE; CITATIONS; COUNTRIES; JOURNALS Abstract: The present study deals with an important problem that currently affects scientists and society, namely, the falsification and manipulation of research and researchers' CVs, which has considerably increased in recent years. This is shown by some studies, the authors of which have found high percentages of researchers who falsify their CV or manipulate data. We analyze the system used to evaluate science and researchers, which is almost exclusively based on the *impact factor*. We review the main critiques on the inappropriate use of the *impact factor* to assess researchers and argue that this has generated a new style of thinking in which the only goal is to obtain publications with an *impact factor*. Over the last few years, the pressure to publish has led to an obsession among researchers to disseminate the multiple indicators of their scientific publications over the Internet, to the extent that such initiatives look like marketing campaigns where researchers advertise themselves. For all these reasons, we propose that this may be a new psychological disorder, given that several criteria indicating maladaptation are clearly met: falsification and/or manipulation of data, falsification of publication indicators, distortion of reality, belief in manipulated data, and an obsession to conduct marketing campaigns of oneself. We address the important ethical and legal implications of such falsifications. Finally, we discuss the need to change the system used to evaluate science and researchers, which undoubtedly promotes these dishonest behaviors or this psychological dysfunction. (C) 2014 Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid. Production by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Buela-Casal, Gualberto] Univ Granada, Granada 18011, Spain. E-mail Addresses: gbuela at ugr.es Cited Reference Count: 70 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA PSICOLOGIA JURIDICA FORENSE, UNIV SANTIAGO COMPOSTELA, FACULTAD PSICOLOGIA, SANTIAGO, E-15782, SPAIN ISSN: 1889-1861 eISSN: 1989-4007 Web of Science Categories: Law; Psychology, Multidisciplinary Research Areas: Government & Law; Psychology IDS Number: AJ8XH Unique ID: WOS:000337990900006 Cited References: Bengoetxea Endika, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, V13, P67 Gross P L, 1927, Science (New York, N.Y.), V66, P385 Thelwall M., 2014, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Buela-Casal Gualberto, 2010, PSICOTHEMA, V22, P270 European Association of Science Editors, 2007, EASE statement on inappropriate use of impact factors, P1 Schekman R., 2013, The Guardian, Anckarsater Henrik, 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, V33, P59 Fernandez-Rios Luis, 2014, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, V14, P154 Wouters P, 2012, Users, narcissism and control-tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century, Casadevall Arturo, 2014, MBIO, V5, Alonso Olivas-Avila Jose, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, V13, P253 Gullo Matthew J., 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P689 Fanelli Daniele, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Thelwall Mike, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P429 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Sternberg R. J., 2013, Chronicle of Higher Education, V59, PA36 Alexander Anita, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P657 Timimi S., 2014, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, V14, Krull Douglas S., 2013, JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V43, P1660 Butler Linda, 2011, EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, V10, P44 Reed Geoffrey M., 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, V12, P461 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 American Society for Cell Biology, 2013, The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), Block Jerald J., 2008, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, V165, P306 Buela-Casal G, 2003, PSICOTHEMA, V15, P23 Vale Ronald D., 2012, MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, V23, P3285 Buela-Casal Gualberto, 2010, REVISTA DE PSICODIDACTICA, V15, P3 Carbonell Xavier, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V97, P102 Simons Kai, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P165 Stroebe Wolfgang, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P670 Fanelli Daniele, 2013, PLOS MEDICINE, V10, Garcia A., 2014, Actualidad en Farmacologra y Terapeutica, V12, P8 Brown Nicholas J. L., 2013, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V68, P801 American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Asendorpf Jens B., 2013, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, V27, P108 Fanelli Daniele, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P891 Ahmed Ishfaq, 2011, AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, V5, P12512 Peset Mancebo M. F., 2011, Web 2.0 en Medicina y Pediatrla (y II)Acta Pedidtrica Espanola, V69, P79 Zahedi Z., 2014, Scientometrics, V96, P1 Obiols Jordi E., 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, V12, P281 Aleixandre-Benavent R., 2010, Anuario ThinkEPI, V4, P217 Lilienfeld Scott O., 2012, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V67, P111 Schekman Randy, 2013, ELIFE, V2, Graczynski M. R., 2008, Medical Science Monitor, V14, P1 Brumback R. A., 2012, Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine, V17, P4 Alonso Olivas-Avila Jose, 2012, PSICOTHEMA, V24, P594 Ceraso H., 2011, Medicina Intensiva, V35, P232 John Leslie K., 2012, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V23, P524 Wortzel Hal S., 2013, JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE, V19, P238 Jaffe Klaus, 2011, INTERCIENCIA, V36, P694 Fanelli Daniele, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Fang F. C., 2012, PNAS, V109, P16751 Bornmann Lutz, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P346 European Federation of Psychologists' Associations, 2013, Staple affair: EFPA Board on Scientific Affairs Statement about Scientific Fraud in Research, Buela-Casal Gualberto, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P281 Fanelli Daniele, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Rodriguez-Testal J. F., 2014, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, P14 Gonzalez-Alcaide Gregorio, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P297 Fanelli Daniele, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V110, P15031 Simonsohn U., 2013, Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results, Zhang Yingting, 2012, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, V31, P45 Thelwall Mike, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Mas-Bleda Amalia, 2014, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V70, P148 Peset-Mancebo M. F., 2011, Acta Pedidtrica Espanola, V69, P3 Pashler Harold, 2012, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V7, P528 Shema Hadas, 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P1018 Mas-Bleda A., 2014, Scientometrics, Alonso Olivas-Avila Jose, 2014, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, V14, P58 Lawrence PA, 2003, NATURE, V422, P259 Perugini Marco, 2014, PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, V9, P319 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337696600026 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Correlation of journal *impact factor* vs randomized controlled trial quality. Authors: Pfiester, P; Beckett, R; Linn, D Author Full Names: Pfiester, Pearl; Beckett, Robert; Linn, Dustin Source: PHARMACOTHERAPY, 34 (6):E80-E80; JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Meeting Abstract Conference Title: Virtual Poster Symposium of the American-College-of-Clinical-Pharmacy Conference Date: MAY 20-21, 2014 Conference Location: ELECTR NETWORK Conference Sponsors: Amer Coll Clin Pharm Addresses: [Pfiester, Pearl; Beckett, Robert; Linn, Dustin] Univ Manchester, Coll Pharm, Ft Wayne, IN USA. Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0277-0008 eISSN: 1875-9114 Web of Science Categories: Pharmacology & Pharmacy Research Areas: Pharmacology & Pharmacy IDS Number: AJ5BV Unique ID: WOS:000337696600026 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337922000011 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Axiomatic measures of intellectual influence Authors: Palacios-Huerta, I; Volij, O Author Full Names: Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio; Volij, Oscar Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 34 85-90; 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.02.011 MAY 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Intellectual influence, Rankings, Axiomatic approach KeyWords Plus: HIRSCH-INDEX; ECONOMICS; JOURNALS Abstract: Measuring influence allows the study of such issues as the impact and reputation of scientists and scientific publications, the dynamics of innovation, and the construction of ranking algorithms for search engines in the world wide web. Ranking methods that measure influence are typically based on the information contained in the network of communications between different entities (scholarly publications, patents, web pages). This paper presents within the same framework recent developments that use the axiomatic approach to derive ranking methods. Two related but essentially different ranking problems are studied: journal ranking problems and scholar ranking problems. The paper concludes with open theoretical and empirical questions for future research. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Volij, Oscar] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel. [Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio] London Sch Econ, London WC2A 2AE, England. [Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio] Univ Basque Country, Ikerbasque Fdn, Valencia, Spain. E-mail Addresses: i.palacios-huerta at lse.ac.uk; ovolij at bgu.ac.il Cited Reference Count: 12 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0167-7187 eISSN: 1873-7986 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AJ7ZT Unique ID: WOS:000337922000011 Cited References: GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Marchant Thierry, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P325 STIGLER GJ, 1995, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V103, P331 Chambers C.P., 2014, J. Econ. Theory, Ellison Glenn, 2013, AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, V5, P63 Jaffe A. B., 2002, Patents, citations and innovations, Woeginger Gerhard J., 2008, MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, V56, P224 Reny P., 2013, How to count citations if you must, Demange G., 2014, Theor. Econ., Posner R.A., 2000, Am. Law Econ. Rev., V2, Palacios-Huerta L, 2004, Econometrica, V72, P963 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337061800010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: HAS HIGHER EDUCATION LOST ITS SOUL? Authors: Chou, CP Author Full Names: Chou, Chuing Prudence Edited by: Chou CP Source: SSCI SYNDROME IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOCAL OR GLOBAL PHENOMENON, 29 141-149; 2014 Book Series: Comparative and International Education Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: TAIWAN; IMPACT Addresses: Natl Chengchi Univ NCCU, Dept Educ, Taipei, Taiwan. Cited Reference Count: 12 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SENSE PUBLISHERS, PO BOX 21858, ROTTERDAM, 3001 AW, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 2214-9880 ISBN: 978-94-6209-405-5; 978-94-6209-407-9; 978-94-6209-406-2 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 IDS Number: BA5YL Unique ID: WOS:000337061800010 Cited References: GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Yu C. L., 2010, A statement on SSCI, Academic Ranking of World Universities, 2007, ARWU 2007, Lai D. M., 2004, Taiwan's higher education academic evaluation conference, Archambault Eric, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P329 Chen K. S., 2004, Taiwan's higher education academic evaluation conference, Chang Dian-fu, 2009, ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, V10, P47 Chou CP, 2012, TAIWAN EDUCATION AT THE CROSSROAD: WHEN GLOBALIZATION MEETS LOCALIZATION, P1 Dutta S., 2010, Global information technology report 2009-2010, Hou Angela Yung-chi, 2012, ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, V13, P77 Chou Chuing Prudence, 2013, ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, V14, P23 Mok K. H., 2004, Globalization and marketization in education: A comparative analysis of Hong Kong and Singapore, *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338004300010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Global research output of nanobiotechnology research: a scientometrics study Authors: Karpagam, R Author Full Names: Karpagam, R. Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 106 (11):1490-1499; JUN 10 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric study, global research output, nanobiotechnology, p-index, scientometrics KeyWords Plus: NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; TECHNOLOGY FIELD; NANO-TECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE; NANOSCIENCE; PATTERNS; PATENTS; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; PUBLICATIONS Abstract: An effective scientometric analysis based on SCOPUS database was conducted to evaluate nano-biotechnology research from a different perspective for the period 2003-2012. Nanobiotechnology has been intensively investigated by bibliometric methods due to its technological importance and expected impacts on economic activity. The present study analyses nanobiotechnology research output during 2003-2012 on different parameters, including the growth, global publications share and citation impact, share of international collaborative papers and contributions of major collaborative partner countries. A total of 114,684 papers were published during 10 years, which received 2,503,795 citations with an average of 21.83 citations per paper. It has been observed that during 2003-2012, USA held the first position by number of publications (34,736), h-index (349), g-index (541), hg-index (434.52) and p-index (326.47). Developing countries such as India, China, South Korea and Canada showed increasing trends in their publications and their activity index also showed increasing trends. Top 10 institutions contributed 7.16% share of total publications. Masssachusetts Institute of Technology, USA received the highest h-index (120) among the top 10 institutions. Biomaterials (1631) was the top journal of publication output; Nano Letters had the highest impact with an average citation per paper (73.86) and American Chemical Society received the highest h-index (158) among the top 10 journals. Addresses: Anna Univ, Univ Lib, Madras 600025, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail Addresses: karpagam.au at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 47 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AJ9CL Unique ID: WOS:000338004300010 Cited References: Persson O, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics, AUG, 2003, Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA, V60, P421 Huang Zan, 2006, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V8, P859 Marinova D, 2003, NANOTECHNOLOGY, V14, PR1 Hirsch E., 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, V102, P16569 Seetharam Raviraja N., 2006, CURRENT SCIENCE, V91, P260 Chau Michael, 2006, DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, V42, P1216 Kostoff Ronald N., 2006, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V8, P301 Meyer M, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V42, P195 Karpagam R., 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P501 Schummer Joachim, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P669 Vinkler Peter, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1963 [Anonymous], 2008, Curr. Sci., V95, P417 Meyer MS, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P163 Huang Z, 2004, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V6, P325 Ehud G., 2007, Plenty of Room for Biology at the Bottom: An Introduction to Bionanotechnology, Prathap Gangan, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P167 Zitt Michel, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1513 Kostoff Ronald N., 2006, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V8, P193 Hullmann A, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P507 Zhou P, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY, V35, P83 Hajar S., 2014, Scientometrics, V98, P457 Braun Tibor, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P651 Braun T, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICS, V38, P321 Hullmann Angela, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P739 Schummer J, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P425 Santo Marcio de Miranda, 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V73, P1013 Noyons E. C., 2003, Nanosci. Nanotechnol.,, Vinkler Peter, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 17-20, 2008, Vienna, AUSTRIA, V82, P461 Chen H., 2009, Mapping Nanotechnology Innovations and Knowledge, P330 Huang Z, 2003, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V5, P333 Sharma, 2009, SCRIPTed, V6, Eto H, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P5 Glaenzel Wolfgang, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P92 Bassecoulard Elise, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P859 Alonso S., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P391 Igami M., 2007, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, SUBRAMANYAM K, 1983, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V6, P33 Fakruddin Md, 2012, JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY, V10, Meyer M., 2001, Mapping excellence in nanotechnologies, Preparatory study, Mithal R., 2005, Ann. Lib. Infor. Stud., V52, P308 Huang Z, 2005, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V7, P343 Pouris Anastassios, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P541 Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P131 Roya B., 2009, Malays. J. Libr. Infor. Sci., V14, P95 Li Xin, 2008, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V10, P3 Wilson C. S, 2001, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, V34, P143 FRAME J D, 1977, Interciencia, V2, P143 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337061800001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: WHY THE SSCI SYNDROME IS A GLOBAL PHENOMENON? EDITOR'S PREFACE Authors: Chou, CP Author Full Names: Chou, Chuing Prudence Edited by: Chou CP Source: SSCI SYNDROME IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOCAL OR GLOBAL PHENOMENON, 29 VII-XV; 2014 Book Series: Comparative and International Education Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; TAIWAN; UNIVERSITIES; EDUCATION; SYSTEM; IMPACT Addresses: [Chou, Chuing Prudence] Natl Chengchi Univ NCCU, Dept Educ, Taipei, Taiwan. [Chou, Chuing Prudence] Akita Int Univ, Akita, Japan. [Chou, Chuing Prudence] Tohoku Univ, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan. Cited Reference Count: 20 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SENSE PUBLISHERS, PO BOX 21858, ROTTERDAM, 3001 AW, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 2214-9880 ISBN: 978-94-6209-405-5; 978-94-6209-407-9; 978-94-6209-406-2 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 IDS Number: BA5YL Unique ID: WOS:000337061800001 Cited References: Dirks A. L., 1998, The new definition of scholarship: How will it change the professoriate?, Tien Flora F., 2007, BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, V28, P105 Huang A. H. M., 2004, reflecting on Taiwan's higher education academic evaluation conference, Taipei, Taiwan, Anderson Melissa S., 2007, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, V13, P437 Huang MH, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P419 Kao Chiang, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V78, P261 Chou Chuing Prudence, 2013, ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, V14, P23 Ball SJ, 1998, COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, V34, P119 Chou CP, 2012, TAIWAN EDUCATION AT THE CROSSROAD: WHEN GLOBALIZATION MEETS LOCALIZATION, P1 Boyer Ernest L., 1990, Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Chou C. P., 2012, Chinese Education and Society, V45, P8 Chu Wan-wen, 2009, INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, V10, P275 Chen Kuan-Hsing, 2009, INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, V10, P206 Qian Y. X., 2004, reflecting on Taiwan's higher education academic evaluation conference, Taipei, Taiwan, Chambers C, 2004, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, V152, P226 MOE, 2011, Summary of education at all levels in SY 2011, Keith B, 1999, AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, V36, P409 Huang Arthur Hou-ming, 2009, INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, V10, P282 Thelwall M, 2003, ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, V27, P333 Flowerdew J., 1999, Journal of Second Language Writing, V8, P243 ======================================================================== * *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337981900002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: "Classic Papers" on Aquatic Humic Substances: Use of the Hirsch Index Authors: Thurman, EM; Ferrer, I Author Full Names: Thurman, E. Michael; Ferrer, Imma Edited by: RosarioOrtiz F Source: ADVANCES IN THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER: IMPACT ON NATURAL AND ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, 1160 7-25; 2014 Book Series: ACS Symposium Series Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: Symp on Physicochemical Characterization of Organic Matter: Past, Present, Future, and Role of Environment / 245th Natl Spring Meeting of the Amer-Chem-Soc (ACS) Conference Date: APR 07-11, 2013 Conference Location: New Orleans, LA Conference Sponsors: Amer Chem Soc, Div Chem Educ Abstract: Citation impact data from the journals, Science and Nature, are used as a benchmark for defining a classic paper with a new application of the journal Hirsch-index, hi. The h(j)-index was first published eight years ago as a citation metric of journal impact. Here we use the hi-index, to measure not only the impact of a journal, but also to measure the impact of papers within a journal. Next the h(j)-index is applied to the field of environmental science with an example of "citation classics" dealing with aquatic humic substances from a 50-year record and a field of >20,000 journal articles. We hypothesize that the h(j)-index may be readily calculated for any scientific paper, regardless of its age or field of activity, to gauge its past, present, or future citation-impact and that of its author. Addresses: [Thurman, E. Michael; Ferrer, Imma] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA. E-mail Addresses: mthurman at ono.com Cited Reference Count: 9 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: AMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 SIXTEENTH ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA ISSN: 0097-6156 ISBN: 978-0-8412-2951-8 Web of Science Categories: Geochemistry & Geophysics; Environmental Sciences Research Areas: Geochemistry & Geophysics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology IDS Number: BA8DE Unique ID: WOS:000337981900002 Cited References: Braun Tibor, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P169 Ciriminna Rosaria, 2013, CHEMISTRY CENTRAL JOURNAL, V7, Bollen Johan, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P669 FAIRTHOR.RA, 1969, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V25, P319 GARFIELD E, 1977, CURRENT CONTENTS, P5 Garfield E., 1984, Curr. Contents, V23, P175 Tsay MY, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P1283 GARFIELD E, 1986, CURRENT CONTENTS, P3 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337061800007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: REFLECTIONS FROM THE SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDEX (SSCI) AND ITS INFLUENCE ON EDUCATION RESEARCH IN TAIWAN Authors: Cheng, SY; Jacob, WJ; Yang, SK Author Full Names: Cheng, (Kent) Sheng Yao; Jacob, W. James; Yang, Shen-Keng Edited by: Chou CP Source: SSCI SYNDROME IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOCAL OR GLOBAL PHENOMENON, 29 97-107; 2014 Book Series: Comparative and International Education Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter Addresses: [Cheng, (Kent) Sheng Yao] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Inst Disadvantaged Students Learning, Minxiong, Chiayi, Taiwan. [Jacob, W. James] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Int Studies Educ, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA. [Yang, Shen-Keng] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Educ, Taipei, Taiwan. Cited Reference Count: 18 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SENSE PUBLISHERS, PO BOX 21858, ROTTERDAM, 3001 AW, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 2214-9880 ISBN: 978-94-6209-405-5; 978-94-6209-407-9; 978-94-6209-406-2 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 IDS Number: BA5YL Unique ID: WOS:000337061800007 Cited References: Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), 1986, ISI Online services user guide: Arts & humanities search, Astin H. S., 1972, Higher education and the disadvantaged student, ISI, 2011, ISI Journal citation reports, Kerr C., 1995, The uses of the university, 1994, Higher education in American society, CLARK BR, 1973, SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, V46, P2 Mars M. M., 2009, The entrepreneurial domains of American higher education, Rhoads R. A., 2006, The university, state, and market: The political economy of globalization in the Americas, Slaughter S., 1997, Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university, Henkel M., 2000, Academic identities and policy change in higher education, P13 Fernandez-Cano A, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V55, P87 Altbach P. G., 1979, Comparative higher education: Research trends and bibliography, Klein Daniel B., 2004, ECON JOURNAL WATCH, V1, P134 Sturgeon David, 2012, British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), V21, P44 ISI, 1998, ISI Web of science, Cook Cheryl, 2011, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, V111, P13 Hawkins J. N., 2001, The transformation of higher education: A comparative perspective, Chen P.-c., 2002, Higher education reform in Taiwan, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337061800008 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: PROBLEMS, STRATEGIES, AND IMPACT OF SSCI PUBLICATION IN ENGLISH Perceptions and Negotiations of Taiwanese Researchers Authors: Liu, JY Author Full Names: Liu, June Yichun Edited by: Chou CP Source: SSCI SYNDROME IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOCAL OR GLOBAL PHENOMENON, 29 109-126; 2014 Book Series: Comparative and International Education Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: DISCOURSE; KNOWLEDGE; EDUCATION; SCHOLARS Addresses: Natl Chengchi Univ, Foreign Language Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan. Cited Reference Count: 48 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SENSE PUBLISHERS, PO BOX 21858, ROTTERDAM, 3001 AW, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 2214-9880 ISBN: 978-94-6209-405-5; 978-94-6209-407-9; 978-94-6209-406-2 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 IDS Number: BA5YL Unique ID: WOS:000337061800008 Cited References: Flowerdew J, 2001, TESOL QUARTERLY, V35, P121 Lave J., 1991, Situated Learning, CANAGARAJAH AS, 1993, TESOL QUARTERLY, V27, P301 JOHNS AM, 1993, TESOL QUARTERLY, V27, P75 Cho S., 2004, Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, V3, P47 Hewings M., 2002, English for Specific Purposes World: A Web-based Journal, V1, Tardy C. M., 2005, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V4, P325 Nunn Roger, 2009, TESOL QUARTERLY, V43, P694 Widdowson H. G., 2007, Discourse analysis, Flowerdew John, 2009, JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, V18, P1 KAPLAN RB, 1966, LANGUAGE LEARNING, V16, P1 Liu J., 2004, Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, V14, P1 Li Yongyan, 2009, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V8, P279 McNabb R., 2001, Composition Studies, V29, P9 Dudley-Evans T., 1994, Problems and prospects, LSP, P219 Cargill M., 2006, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V5, P207 Huang Ju Chuan, 2010, JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, V9, P33 Gao Yihong, 2009, TESOL QUARTERLY, V43, P700 SWALES J, 1987, TESOL QUARTERLY, V21, P41 Cheung Y., 2010, Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, V20, P207 Canagarajah A. S., 2003, Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education, P197 Curry MJ, 2004, TESOL QUARTERLY, V38, P663 Phillipson R., 1992, Linguistic Imperialism, Jolliffe D. A., 1988, V2, P35 Braine George, 2005, TESOL QUARTERLY, V39, P707 Tardy Christine, 2004, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V3, P247 Flowerdew J., 1999, Journal of Second Language Writing, V8, P243 Hamp-Lyons Liz, 2009, TESOL QUARTERLY, V43, P690 Swales John M., 1990, Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Liu Jun, 2001, CATESOL Journal, V13, P53 Shi L., 2005, TESOL Quarterly, V39, P765 Ferenz O., 2005, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, V4, P339 Mauranen A., 1993, English for Specific Purposes, V12, P3 GERGEN KJ, 1985, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, V40, P266 Gao Y., 2007, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, V17, P221 Bartholomae D., 1985, When a writer can't write, P134 Hamilton M., 1998, Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community, Cargill Margaret, 2012, ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, V31, P60 Flowerdew J., 1999, Journal of Second Language Writing, V8, P123 Belcher Diane D., 2007, JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, V16, P1 Li D. C. S., 1999, English World-Wide, V20, P67 Li Y., 2002, Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, V12, P179 St John M. J., 1987, English for Specific Purposes, V6.2, P113 Gibbs W. W., 1995, Scientific American, P76 Canagarajah AS, 1996, WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, V13, P435 Flowerdew J, 2000, TESOL QUARTERLY, V34, P127 Pennycook A., 1994, The cultural politics of English as an international language, Salager-Meyer F., 2008, Journal of English Academic Purposes, V7, P121 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337061800011 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: SSCI Syndrome in Higher Education: A Local or Global Phenomenon : Edited by: Chou CP Source: SSCI SYNDROME IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOCAL OR GLOBAL PHENOMENON, 29 1-156; 10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 2014 Book Series: Comparative and International Education Language: English Document Type: Book Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SENSE PUBLISHERS, PO BOX 21858, ROTTERDAM, 3001 AW, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 2214-9880 ISBN: 978-94-6209-405-5; 978-94-6209-407-9; 978-94-6209-406-2 IDS Number: BA5YL Unique ID: WOS:000337061800011 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337769200037 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A bibliometric analysis of the performance of Advanced Materials Research from 2005 to 2012 Authors: Liu, T Author Full Names: Liu, Ting Edited by: Kao JCM; Sung WP; Chen R Source: FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS II, 803 165-168; 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.803.165 2013 Book Series: Advanced Materials Research Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 2nd International Conference on Chemical Engineering, Metallurgical Engineering and Metallic Materials (CMMM 2013) Conference Date: AUG 03-04, 2013 Conference Location: Dali, PEOPLES R CHINA Conference Sponsors: Int Frontiers Sci & Technol Res Assoc, HongKong Control Engn & Informat Sci Res Assoc Author Keywords: Scientometrics, Citation, Author Keywords, Journal Abstract: This paper presents a detailed chronological survey of paper published in the journal titled Advanced Materials Research from 2005 to 2012. An analysis of the research performance according to publication output, country, institute, classification code and controlled vocabulary used. Results showed that China published about 85% of total publications, and School Of Mechanical Engineering And Automation, Northeastern University was the most productive institute. In addition, results also showed that "manufacture", "building materials", "design", "civil engineering" and "construction equipment" were the most frequently used controlled vocabularies Addresses: Hubei Polytech Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Huangshi 435003, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: xianglt at live.cn Cited Reference Count: 2 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: TRANS TECH PUBLICATIONS LTD, LAUBLSRUTISTR 24, CH-8717 STAFA-ZURICH, SWITZERLAND ISSN: 1022-6680 ISBN: 978-3-03785-851-6 IDS Number: BA7TY Unique ID: WOS:000337769200037 Cited References: Wang Ming-Huang, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P813 RICE EW, 1983, CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, V29, P1858 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337983600010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: *Citation* networks of related trials are often disconnected: implications for bidirectional *citation* searches Authors: Robinson, KA; Dunn, AG; Tsafnat, G; Glasziou, P Author Full Names: Robinson, Karen A.; Dunn, Adam G.; Tsafnat, Guy; Glasziou, Paul Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 67 (7):793-799; 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.015 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Citation networks, Systematic reviews, Searching, Clinical trials, Meta-analysis, Network analysis KeyWords Plus: SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; BIAS; METAANALYSIS; PUBLICATION; CHOLESTEROL; ARTICLES; DISEASE Abstract: Background and Objectives: Reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should set findings within the context of previous research. The resulting network of citations would also provide an alternative search method for clinicians, researchers, and systematic reviewers seeking to base decisions on all available evidence. We sought to determine the connectedness of citation networks of RCTs by examining direct (referenced trials) and indirect (through references of referenced trials, etc) citation of trials to one another. Methods: Meta-analyses were used to create citation networks of RCTs addressing the same clinical questions. The primary measure was the proportion of networks where following citation links between RCTs identifies the complete set of RCTs, forming a single connected citation group. Other measures included the number of disconnected groups (islands) within each network, the number of citations in the network relative to the maximum possible, and the maximum number of links in the path between two connected trials (a measure of indirectness of citations). Results: We included 259 meta-analyses with a total of 2,413 and a median of seven RCTs each. For 46% (118 of 259) of networks, the RCTs formed a single connected citation group-one island. For the other 54% of networks, where at least one RCT group was not cited by others, 39% had two citation islands and 4% (10 of 257) had 10 or more islands. On average, the citation networks had 38% of the possible citations to other trials (if each trial had cited all earlier trials). The number of citation islands and the maximum number of citation links increased with increasing numbers of trials in the network. Conclusion: Available evidence to answer a clinical question may be identified by using network citations created with a small initial corpus of eligible trials. However, the number of islands means that citation networks cannot be relied on for evidence retrieval. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Robinson, Karen A.] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA. [Robinson, Karen A.] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA. [Robinson, Karen A.] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA. [Dunn, Adam G.; Tsafnat, Guy] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Hlth Informat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. [Glasziou, Paul] Bond Univ, Ctr Res Evidence Based Practice, Gold Coast, Qld 4229, Australia. E-mail Addresses: krobin at jhmi.edu Funding Acknowledgement: National Health and Medical Research Council Funding Text: A.G.D. and G.T. acknowledge support from National Health and Medical Research Council through a project grant; no other relationships or activities exist that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Cited Reference Count: 25 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA ISSN: 0895-4356 eISSN: 1878-5921 Web of Science Categories: Health Care Sciences & Services; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Research Areas: Health Care Sciences & Services; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health IDS Number: AJ8UP Unique ID: WOS:000337983600010 Cited References: Ives NJ, 2004, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V329, P593 Greenberg Steven A., 2009, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V339, GOTZSCHE PC, 1987, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V295, P654 Paul M, 2004, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V328, P668 Bhandari Mohit, 2007, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, V50, P119 Kulkarni Abhaya V., 2007, PLOS ONE, V2, Horsley T, 2011, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V10, Deltenre P, 2004, JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, V41, P462 Lokker Cynthia, 2008, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V336, P655 Kastner M, 2008, J Clin Epidemiol, V62, P149 CAMPBELL FM, 1990, BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V78, P376 Wulffele MG, 2004, JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V256, P1 TSAFNAT G, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V346, Fiorentino F., 2011, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, V104, P1085 Greenhalgh T, 2005, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V331, P1064 Callaham M, 2002, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION4th International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, SEP 14-16, 2001, BARCELONA, SPAIN, V287, P2847 RAVNSKOV U, 1992, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V305, P15 Helmer D, 2001, BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V89, P346 Nieminen Pentti, 2006, BMC medical research methodology, V6, P42 Hyett Matthew, 2009, AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, V43, P173 Kjaergard LL, 2002, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, V55, P407 Lane Daniel, 2013, JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, V28, P469 Clarke Mike, 2010, LANCET, V376, P20 Robinson Karen A., 2011, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V154, P50 Savoie I, 2003, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, V19, P168 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338118900034 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Evaluating big deal journal bundles Authors: Bergstrom, TC; Courant, PN; McAfee, RP; Williams, MA Author Full Names: Bergstrom, Theodore C.; Courant, Paul N.; McAfee, R. Preston; Williams, Michael A. Source: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 111 (26):9425-9430; 10.1073/pnas.1403006111 JUL 1 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: monopoly, bargaining, all-or-nothing price, efficiency, information technology KeyWords Plus: ACADEMIC JOURNALS Abstract: Large commercial publishers sell bundled online subscriptions to their entire list of academic journals at prices significantly lower than the sum of their la carte prices. Bundle prices differ drastically between institutions, but they are not publicly posted. The data that we have collected enable us to compare the bundle prices charged by commercial publishers with those of nonprofit societies and to examine the types of price discrimination practiced by commercial and nonprofit journal publishers. This information is of interest to economists who study monopolist pricing, librarians interested in making efficient use of library budgets, and scholars who are interested in the availability of the work that they publish. Addresses: [Bergstrom, Theodore C.] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Econ, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 USA. [Courant, Paul N.] Univ Michigan, Dept Econ, Gerald Ford Sch Publ Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA. [Courant, Paul N.] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA. [McAfee, R. Preston] Google, Strateg Technol, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA. [Williams, Michael A.] Competit Econ LLC, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA. E-mail Addresses: tedb at econ.ucsb.edu Cited Reference Count: 25 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: NATL ACAD SCIENCES, 2101 CONSTITUTION AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20418 USA ISSN: 0027-8424 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AK0QG Unique ID: WOS:000338118900034 Cited References: Dewatripont Mathias, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION21th Annual Congress of the European-Economic-Association, AUG 24-28, 2006, Vienna, AUSTRIA, V5, P400 Strieb KL, 2013, Res Libr Issues, V282, P13 Tenopir C, 2000, Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers, Bergstrom TC, 2001, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V15, P183 Prosser D, 2011, Serials, V24, P60 Rapp D, 2011, Libr J, University of California Berkeley Library, 2008, Scholarly Communication: Elsevier, a Case Study, Library Journal Staff, 2004, UC System inks five year deal with Elsevier, stops price inflation, Odlyzko A, 2013, Open access, library and publisher competition, and the evolution of general commerce, Hahn K, 2005, Libr Acad, V5, P151 Bergstrom CT, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V101, P897 West Jevin D., 2010, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V71, P236 Bergstrom T, 2013, Journal cost-effectiveness 2013, Edlin AS, 2004, ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL, V72, P119 Haank D, 2001, Proceedings of the Second International Council for Science-United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization International Conferences on Electronic Publishing in Science, Courant P, 2010, The Idea of Order, P81 Blixrud JC, 2014, Unwrapping the bundle: An examination of research libraries and the big deal., Althouse Benjamin M., 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P27 Poynder R, 2011, The big deal: Not price but cost, Morrison H, 2011, Chapter two: Scholarly communication in crisis, Varian HR, 1996, First Monday, V1, Gowers T, 2012, Elsevier-My part in its downfall, Frazier K, 2001, The librarian's dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the big deal., Armstrong M, 1999, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, V66, P151 Bakos Y, 1998, The Economics of Digital Information Goods, P114 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337953000003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Centres and Peripheries: Research Styles and Publication Patterns in 'Top' US Journals and their European Alternatives, 1960-2010 Authors: Usdiken, B Author Full Names: Usdiken, Behlul Source: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 51 (5):764-789; 10.1111/joms.12082 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: centre-periphery model, European-ness, journal publications, management and organization studies, qualitative research, quantitative research KeyWords Plus: BUSINESS SCHOOLS; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; INSTITUTIONAL FIELD; AMERICAN JOURNALS; NORTH-AMERICA; ORGANIZATION; FUTURE; IMPACT Abstract: In view of recent literature, suggesting a growing international ascendancy of US-style scholarship but also a decreasing US dominance in journal publications, I ask two questions with regard to management and organization studies: (1) whether there has been an increasing convergence towards US-style research; and (2) whether the purported decline in the relative amount of US publications has been uniform across leading journals based in the USA and Europe. In addressing these questions, I take a historical perspective and draw upon the centre-periphery model of international scholarship, arguing that convergence or fragmentation in styles of research and variations in publication patterns have evolved through the interplay between processes of influence by the centre (i.e., the USA) and imitative or competitive responses by the periphery. Empirically, the study spans the period 1960-2010 and is confined to top' US-based journals and their main European alternatives. The findings answer the first question with a no, other than a greater tendency towards the US-style when educational or collaborative ties to the USA are involved and by the recently emerging parts of the periphery'. The second question again is answered with a no, the decline has been much less in top US journals relative to the ones based in Europe'. Addresses: Sabanci Univ, TR-34956 Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail Addresses: behlul at sabanciuniv.edu.tr Cited Reference Count: 69 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0022-2380 eISSN: 1467-6486 Web of Science Categories: Business; Management Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AJ8KP Unique ID: WOS:000337953000003 Cited References: COE R, 1984, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V27, P660 2010, Academic Journal Quality Guide (Version 4), Augier M, 2005, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V16, P85 Baum Joel A. C., 2011, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V22, P1663 Baden-Fuller C, 2000, LONG RANGE PLANNING, V33, P621 Meyer Renate E., 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P737 Leung Kwok, 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V50, P510 GALTUNG J, 1971, JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, V8, P81 Grey Christopher, 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P677 ARNOVE RF, 1980, COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW, V24, P48 Macdonald Stuart, 2007, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V44, P640 Hinings C. R. (Bob), 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P659 Engwall Lars, 2011, BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V22, P432 Battilana Julie, 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P695 Adler Nancy J., 2009, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V8, P72 Altbach P. G., 1998, Comparative Higher Education: Knowledge, the University and Development, Holt Robin, 2013, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V34, P1587 Merilainen Susan, 2008, ORGANIZATION, V15, P584 Trieschmann JS, 2000, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V43, P1130 Ben-David J., 1984, The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study, Bruton Garry D., 2008, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V45, P636 Baum Joel A. C., 2007, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V28, P37 Danell R, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V49, P23 Bluhm Dustin J., 2011, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V48, P1866 Tsui Anne S., 2007, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V50, P1353 Jack Gavin, 2011, ORGANIZATION, V18, P275 Corbett Andrew, 2013, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V50, P1349 Whitley R, 2000, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Lampel Joseph, 2011, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V22, P1655 STEIER L, 1995, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V32, P337 HININGS CR, 1988, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V9, P2 Palmer Donald, 2006, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V51, P535 Bacharach SB, 2000, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V45, P704 WALLERST.I, 1974, COMPARATIVE STUDIES IN SOCIETY AND HISTORY, V16, P387 Tsui Anne S., 2009, MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, V5, P1 Mangematin Vincent, 2008, LONG RANGE PLANNING, V41, P117 Tung R. L., 2006, Asian Business and Management, V5, P23 DAFT RL, 1980, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V25, P623 Saunders John, 2011, BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V22, P401 Certo S. Trevis, 2010, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V9, P591 Schott T., 1998, Journal of World-Systems Research, V4, P112 Phelan SE, 2002, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V23, P1161 Durand R, 2005, ORGANIZATION STUDIES17th EGOS Colloquium, JUL 05-07, 2001, LYON, FRANCE, V26, P165 Podsakoff Philip M., 2008, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V34, P641 SHARPLIN AD, 1985, HUMAN RELATIONS, V38, P139 Heugens P. P. M. A. R., 2005, Strategic Organization, V3, P117 Zammuto Raymond F., 2008, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, V7, P256 Burgess Thomas F., 2010, BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V21, P627 Shils E, 1988, Center: Ideas and Institutions, P250 Fernandez Rodriguez Carlos Jesus, 2011, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, V28, P160 March J. G., 2005, Management and Organization Review, V1, P5 Hedmo Tina, 2008, EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES IN TRANSITION: ISSUES, MODELS AND CASES, P113 Vogel Rick, 2012, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V33, P1015 Pratt Michael G., 2008, ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, V11, P481 Knudsen C., 2003, P262 Shils E, 1975, Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology, P3 Uesdiken Behluel, 2009, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V30, P1063 Shils E, 1972, The Intellectuals and the Powers, and Other Essays, P355 Barney Jay B., 2009, MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, V5, P15 Harzing A.-W., 2005, Australian Journal of Management, V30, P183 WEAVER CN, 1975, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V18, P411 Alatas S. F, 2003, Current Sociology, V51, P599 Djelic M.-L., 1998, Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business, McKee MC, 2005, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, V22, P288 March James G., 2007, ORGANIZATION STUDIES22nd Annual EGOS Colloquium, 2006, Bergen, NORWAY, V28, P9 FRANKE RH, 1990, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V11, P243 Peters K., 2012, Journal of Management, Usdiken Behlul, 2010, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V31, P715 SCHOTT T, 1988, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, V17, P219 ======================================================================== *Record 20 of 49. *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337978900017 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Is ASJ Still a "Clinical Journal"? Authors: Nahai, F Author Full Names: Nahai, Foad Source: AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 34 (5):782-783; 10.1177/1090820X14536027 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Cited Reference Count: 7 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA ISSN: 1090-820X eISSN: 1527-330X Web of Science Categories: Surgery Research Areas: Surgery IDS Number: AJ8SW Unique ID: WOS:000337978900017 Cited References: Roca Guilherme Berto, 2014, AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, V34, P769 Tennent DJ, What is the impact factor?, Mills Daniel C., II, 2014, AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, V34, P776 Lenfant C, 2003, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINEAnnual Meeting of the Massachusetts-Medical-Society, MAY 03, 2003, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, V349, P868 Ansorge Heather, 2014, AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, V34, P438 Yaundong L, 2014, Aesthetic Surg J., V34, P168 American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, ASAPS mission statement, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337806300023 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Beyond *Bibliometrics*: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact Authors: Adams, J Author Full Names: Adams, Jonathan Source: NATURE, 510 (7506):470-471; JUN 26 2014 Language: English Document Type: Book Review Addresses: [Adams, Jonathan] Digital Sci, London, England. [Adams, Jonathan] Digital Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England. E-mail Addresses: j.adams at digital-science.com Cited Reference Count: 1 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, MACMILLAN BUILDING, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND ISSN: 0028-0836 eISSN: 1476-4687 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AJ6LK Unique ID: WOS:000337806300023 Cited References: CRONIN B, 2014, BIBLIOMETRICS HARNES, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338004300010 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Global research output of nanobiotechnology research: a *scientometrics* study Authors: Karpagam, R Author Full Names: Karpagam, R. Source: CURRENT SCIENCE, 106 (11):1490-1499; JUN 10 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric study, global research output, nanobiotechnology, p-index, scientometrics KeyWords Plus: NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; TECHNOLOGY FIELD; NANO-TECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE; NANOSCIENCE; PATTERNS; PATENTS; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; PUBLICATIONS Abstract: An effective scientometric analysis based on SCOPUS database was conducted to evaluate nano-biotechnology research from a different perspective for the period 2003-2012. Nanobiotechnology has been intensively investigated by bibliometric methods due to its technological importance and expected impacts on economic activity. The present study analyses nanobiotechnology research output during 2003-2012 on different parameters, including the growth, global publications share and citation impact, share of international collaborative papers and contributions of major collaborative partner countries. A total of 114,684 papers were published during 10 years, which received 2,503,795 citations with an average of 21.83 citations per paper. It has been observed that during 2003-2012, USA held the first position by number of publications (34,736), h-index (349), g-index (541), hg-index (434.52) and p-index (326.47). Developing countries such as India, China, South Korea and Canada showed increasing trends in their publications and their activity index also showed increasing trends. Top 10 institutions contributed 7.16% share of total publications. Masssachusetts Institute of Technology, USA received the highest h-index (120) among the top 10 institutions. Biomaterials (1631) was the top journal of publication output; Nano Letters had the highest impact with an average citation per paper (73.86) and American Chemical Society received the highest h-index (158) among the top 10 journals. Addresses: Anna Univ, Univ Lib, Madras 600025, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail Addresses: karpagam.au at gmail.com Cited Reference Count: 47 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES, C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA ISSN: 0011-3891 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AJ9CL Unique ID: WOS:000338004300010 Cited References: Persson O, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics, AUG, 2003, Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA, V60, P421 Huang Zan, 2006, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V8, P859 Marinova D, 2003, NANOTECHNOLOGY, V14, PR1 Hirsch E., 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, V102, P16569 Seetharam Raviraja N., 2006, CURRENT SCIENCE, V91, P260 Chau Michael, 2006, DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, V42, P1216 Kostoff Ronald N., 2006, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V8, P301 Meyer M, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V42, P195 Karpagam R., 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P501 Schummer Joachim, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P669 Vinkler Peter, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V62, P1963 [Anonymous], 2008, Curr. Sci., V95, P417 Meyer MS, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS6th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, MAY 24-27, 2000, LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS, V51, P163 Huang Z, 2004, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V6, P325 Ehud G., 2007, Plenty of Room for Biology at the Bottom: An Introduction to Bionanotechnology, Prathap Gangan, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P167 Zitt Michel, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1513 Kostoff Ronald N., 2006, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V8, P193 Hullmann A, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P507 Zhou P, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY, V35, P83 Hajar S., 2014, Scientometrics, V98, P457 Braun Tibor, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P651 Braun T, 1997, SCIENTOMETRICS, V38, P321 Hullmann Angela, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P739 Schummer J, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V59, P425 Santo Marcio de Miranda, 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V73, P1013 Noyons E. C., 2003, Nanosci. Nanotechnol.,, Vinkler Peter, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, SEP 17-20, 2008, Vienna, AUSTRIA, V82, P461 Chen H., 2009, Mapping Nanotechnology Innovations and Knowledge, P330 Huang Z, 2003, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V5, P333 Sharma, 2009, SCRIPTed, V6, Eto H, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P5 Glaenzel Wolfgang, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P92 Bassecoulard Elise, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P859 Alonso S., 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P391 Igami M., 2007, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, SUBRAMANYAM K, 1983, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, V6, P33 Fakruddin Md, 2012, JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY, V10, Meyer M., 2001, Mapping excellence in nanotechnologies, Preparatory study, Mithal R., 2005, Ann. Lib. Infor. Stud., V52, P308 Huang Z, 2005, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V7, P343 Pouris Anastassios, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P541 Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P131 Roya B., 2009, Malays. J. Libr. Infor. Sci., V14, P95 Li Xin, 2008, JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, V10, P3 Wilson C. S, 2001, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, V34, P143 FRAME J D, 1977, Interciencia, V2, P143 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338009700007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Measuring HINARI use in Nigeria through a *citation analysis* of Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Authors: Anyaoku, EN; Anunobi, CV Author Full Names: Anyaoku, Ebele N.; Anunobi, Chinwe V. Source: HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 31 (2):148-155; 10.1111/hir.12056 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: access to information, Africa, West, citation analysis, open access (OA) KeyWords Plus: INFORMATION; COUNTRIES; ACCESS; IMPACT Abstract: Background: HINARI is one of the four programmes of Research4Life managed by the World Health Organization in partnership with Yale University Library. HINARI provides online access to the world's health-related scientific literature free or at very low cost to researchers in developing countries. The research examined the use of HINARI through a 5-year (2007-2011) citation analysis of Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. Method: The study was a citation analysis of 5 years of published volumes of Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. The analysis was carried out using issues ranging from volume 10 (2007) to 14 (2011). The use of HINARI was determined by comparing the total journal titles and articles cited from HINARI with non-HINARI journals in the five volumes of Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice (NJCP). Results: Results show that only 42.8% of the journal titles cited are available in HINARI. On the contrary, in terms of total articles cited from the journals, HINARI had a higher citation of 56.1% with a greater citation frequency of individual titles. Conclusion: The higher article citations and repeated use of individual titles available in HINARI suggest that health researchers in Nigeria are using the HINARI resource to a measurable extent. Addresses: [Anyaoku, Ebele N.] Nnamdi Azikiwe Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Med Lib, Anambra, Nigeria. [Anunobi, Chinwe V.] Nnamdi Azikiwe Univ, Digital Lib, Awka, Anambra, Nigeria. E-mail Addresses: ebeleanyaoku at yahoo.com Cited Reference Count: 17 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 1471-1834 eISSN: 1471-1842 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AJ9EJ Unique ID: WOS:000338009700007 Cited References: Voronin Yegor, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Musoke M G, 2000, Health libraries review, V17, P194 Ross V. T., 2011, First Monday, V16, Eyers J., 2010, Africa Health 2010, Aronson B, 2004, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V350, P966 Ramesh L. S. R. C. V., 2000, Indian Journal of Information, Library & Society, V4, P171 Davis Philip M., 2011, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V99, P208 Goulding A, 2001, JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, V33, P109 Liang L., 2010, Geometrics and Information Science of Wuhan University, V35, P6 Kahkireddi S. V., 2004, British Medical Journal, V328, P1190 Kuruvilla S, 2004, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V328, P1193 Royall J., 2011, AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, V11, P457 Aronson B., 2012, Research 4life, Gayos O., 2007, PLoS Medicine, V4, P220 Brody T., 2004, D-Lib Magazine, P10 Reinsfelder Thomas L., 2012, COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, V73, P263 Parker K., World Library And Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference And Assembly, 10-15 August, 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337696600026 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Correlation of journal *impact factor* vs randomized controlled trial quality. Authors: Pfiester, P; Beckett, R; Linn, D Author Full Names: Pfiester, Pearl; Beckett, Robert; Linn, Dustin Source: PHARMACOTHERAPY, 34 (6):E80-E80; JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Meeting Abstract Conference Title: Virtual Poster Symposium of the American-College-of-Clinical-Pharmacy Conference Date: MAY 20-21, 2014 Conference Location: ELECTR NETWORK Conference Sponsors: Amer Coll Clin Pharm Addresses: [Pfiester, Pearl; Beckett, Robert; Linn, Dustin] Univ Manchester, Coll Pharm, Ft Wayne, IN USA. Cited Reference Count: 0 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0277-0008 eISSN: 1875-9114 Web of Science Categories: Pharmacology & Pharmacy Research Areas: Pharmacology & Pharmacy IDS Number: AJ5BV Unique ID: WOS:000337696600026 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337860200012 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: ON SCIENTIFIC PAPERS *CITATION* Authors: Duclout, PK; Galassi, JG Author Full Names: Duclout, Pablo Kittl; Galassi, Jorge Gibert Source: INTERCIENCIA, 39 (5):357-360; MAY 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SPECIALTIES; NETWORKS; SCIENCE Abstract: The paper focuses on De Solla Price's classic work from 1976, and discusses in relation with others contributions, its role within the field of research. The aim is to arrive to a minimum of hypothesis and formulas to represent experimental data properly. We vindicate a formulation based on classical distribution by Vilfredo Pareto to do so. Finally, a discontinuous in-terpretation for scientific citation is presented, with foundations in the presumptions that a given group of papers A is different from another group B due to the capacity to produce N citations by one group as well as some different capacity to produce N+1 by another group. Addresses: [Duclout, Pablo Kittl] Univ Nacl Cuyo, RA-5500 Mendoza, Argentina. [Duclout, Pablo Kittl; Galassi, Jorge Gibert] Univ Chile, Santiago, Chile. [Galassi, Jorge Gibert] Univ Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile. E-mail Addresses: jorge.gibert at uv.cl Cited Reference Count: 22 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INTERCIENCIA, APARTADO 51842, CARACAS 1050A, VENEZUELA ISSN: 0378-1844 Web of Science Categories: Ecology Research Areas: Environmental Sciences & Ecology IDS Number: AJ7EO Unique ID: WOS:000337860200012 Cited References: van den Besselaar P, 1996, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V47, P415 CARPENTE.MP, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P425 Jones Benjamin F., 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P1259 Burt RS, 1982, Towards a Structural Theory of Action, Lotka AJ, 1926, J. Wash. Acad. Sci., V16, P17 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Knoke D, 1982, Network Analysis, MCCAIN KW, 1994, KNOWLEDGE-CREATION DIFFUSION UTILIZATION, V15, P285 PRICE DJD, 1976, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V27, P292 Pareto W, 1896, Cours d'Economie Politique, Acevedo R, 2007, Statistics of Quotations Reported by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). A Working Example of a Chilean Institution, DOREIAN P, 1985, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P28 Cole J, 1973, Social Stratification in Science, Cozzens SE, 1993, Proc. Joint EC/Leiden Workshop on Science and Technology Indicators, P219 LEYDESDORFF L, 1986, SCIENTOMETRICS, V9, P103 Tijssen RJW, 1987, Scientometrics, V11, P347 Dieulefait CE, 1942, Elementos de Estadistica Metodologica, Tijssen RJ W, 1992, Cartography of Science: Scientometric Mpping with Multidimensional Scaling Methods, De Solla Price DJ, 1963, ittle Science, Big Science, Doreian P, 1986, Scientometrics, V11, P63 BORGMAN CL, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P397 Kittl P, 1995, En El Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico, Particularmente en Chile, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337061800007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: REFLECTIONS FROM THE SOCIAL SCIENCE *CITATION* INDEX (SSCI) AND ITS INFLUENCE ON EDUCATION RESEARCH IN TAIWAN Authors: Cheng, SY; Jacob, WJ; Yang, SK Author Full Names: Cheng, (Kent) Sheng Yao; Jacob, W. James; Yang, Shen-Keng Edited by: Chou CP Source: SSCI SYNDROME IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOCAL OR GLOBAL PHENOMENON, 29 97-107; 2014 Book Series: Comparative and International Education Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter Addresses: [Cheng, (Kent) Sheng Yao] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Inst Disadvantaged Students Learning, Minxiong, Chiayi, Taiwan. [Jacob, W. James] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Int Studies Educ, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA. [Yang, Shen-Keng] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Educ, Taipei, Taiwan. Cited Reference Count: 18 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SENSE PUBLISHERS, PO BOX 21858, ROTTERDAM, 3001 AW, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 2214-9880 ISBN: 978-94-6209-405-5; 978-94-6209-407-9; 978-94-6209-406-2 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 IDS Number: BA5YL Unique ID: WOS:000337061800007 Cited References: Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), 1986, ISI Online services user guide: Arts & humanities search, Astin H. S., 1972, Higher education and the disadvantaged student, ISI, 2011, ISI Journal citation reports, Kerr C., 1995, The uses of the university, 1994, Higher education in American society, CLARK BR, 1973, SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, V46, P2 Mars M. M., 2009, The entrepreneurial domains of American higher education, Rhoads R. A., 2006, The university, state, and market: The political economy of globalization in the Americas, Slaughter S., 1997, Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university, Henkel M., 2000, Academic identities and policy change in higher education, P13 Fernandez-Cano A, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V55, P87 Altbach P. G., 1979, Comparative higher education: Research trends and bibliography, Klein Daniel B., 2004, ECON JOURNAL WATCH, V1, P134 Sturgeon David, 2012, British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), V21, P44 ISI, 1998, ISI Web of science, Cook Cheryl, 2011, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, V111, P13 Hawkins J. N., 2001, The transformation of higher education: A comparative perspective, Chen P.-c., 2002, Higher education reform in Taiwan, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337769200036 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A *bibliometric* analysis of sludge research from 2000 to 2011 Authors: Liu, T Author Full Names: Liu, Ting Edited by: Kao JCM; Sung WP; Chen R Source: FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS II, 803 161-164; 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.803.161 2013 Book Series: Advanced Materials Research Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 2nd International Conference on Chemical Engineering, Metallurgical Engineering and Metallic Materials (CMMM 2013) Conference Date: AUG 03-04, 2013 Conference Location: Dali, PEOPLES R CHINA Conference Sponsors: Int Frontiers Sci & Technol Res Assoc, HongKong Control Engn & Informat Sci Res Assoc Author Keywords: Sludge, Bibliometric, SCI, Environmental Sciences, Wastewater KeyWords Plus: SEWAGE-SLUDGE; TRENDS Abstract: This study explores a bibliometric approach to quantitatively assessing current research trends on sludge, by using the related literature published between 2000 and 2011. The articles acquired from such literature were concentrated on the general analysis by publication type and language, characteristics of articles outputs, country, subject categories and the frequency of title-words used. Over the past 12 years, there had been a notable growth trend in publication outputs, along with more participation of countries/territories. An analysis of the title-words showed that wastewater treatment was still the most hot topic in sludge research and "wastewater", "heavy metal", "waste water treatment" and "anaerobic digestion" were recent major topics of sludge research. Besides, membrane bioreactor technology has been advancing rapidly around the world and became an ideal way to reduce sludge production in the wastewater treatment process. Addresses: Hubei Polytech Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Huangshi 435003, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: xianglt at live.cn Cited Reference Count: 10 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: TRANS TECH PUBLICATIONS LTD, LAUBLSRUTISTR 24, CH-8717 STAFA-ZURICH, SWITZERLAND ISSN: 1022-6680 ISBN: 978-3-03785-851-6 IDS Number: BA7TY Unique ID: WOS:000337769200036 Cited References: Manara P., 2012, RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, V16, P2566 Zhang Weiwei, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P305 Fenu A., 2010, WATER RESEARCH, V44, P4272 Suk Fat-Moon, 2011, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, V23, P295 Rulkens Wim, 2008, ENERGY & FUELSInternational Conference on Bioenergy Outlook, APR 26-27, 2007, Singapore, SINGAPORE, V22, P9 Harrison Ellen Z., 2006, SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, V367, P481 Huang Y., 2008, Scientometrics, V75, P111 Braun T, 2000, CHEMICAL REVIEWS, V100, P23 Pathak Ashish, 2009, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, V90, P2343 Wen Hang, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P51 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337769200037 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A *bibliometric* analysis of the performance of Advanced Materials Research from 2005 to 2012 Authors: Liu, T Author Full Names: Liu, Ting Edited by: Kao JCM; Sung WP; Chen R Source: FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS II, 803 165-168; 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.803.165 2013 Book Series: Advanced Materials Research Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 2nd International Conference on Chemical Engineering, Metallurgical Engineering and Metallic Materials (CMMM 2013) Conference Date: AUG 03-04, 2013 Conference Location: Dali, PEOPLES R CHINA Conference Sponsors: Int Frontiers Sci & Technol Res Assoc, HongKong Control Engn & Informat Sci Res Assoc Author Keywords: Scientometrics, Citation, Author Keywords, Journal Abstract: This paper presents a detailed chronological survey of paper published in the journal titled Advanced Materials Research from 2005 to 2012. An analysis of the research performance according to publication output, country, institute, classification code and controlled vocabulary used. Results showed that China published about 85% of total publications, and School Of Mechanical Engineering And Automation, Northeastern University was the most productive institute. In addition, results also showed that "manufacture", "building materials", "design", "civil engineering" and "construction equipment" were the most frequently used controlled vocabularies Addresses: Hubei Polytech Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Huangshi 435003, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: xianglt at live.cn Cited Reference Count: 2 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: TRANS TECH PUBLICATIONS LTD, LAUBLSRUTISTR 24, CH-8717 STAFA-ZURICH, SWITZERLAND ISSN: 1022-6680 ISBN: 978-3-03785-851-6 IDS Number: BA7TY Unique ID: WOS:000337769200037 Cited References: Wang Ming-Huang, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P813 RICE EW, 1983, CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, V29, P1858 ======================================= *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300014 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Research productivity in soil science in the Philippines Authors: Navarrete, IA; Asio, VB Author Full Names: Navarrete, Ian A.; Asio, Victor B. Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):261-272; 10.1007/s11192-013-1202-6 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, Scientific publication, Soil science, Web of science KeyWords Plus: NITROGEN-USE EFFICIENCY; IRRIGATED LOWLAND RICE; WATER MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; ASIA; METHANE; YIELD; FIELD; LEYTE; FLUX Abstract: Understanding the direction and magnitude of soil science publication in the Philippines is crucial in formulating research priorities and funding allocation. There is no consensus on the current state of soil science publication in the Philippines, thus this study was conducted to elucidate the trend in the soil science publication. We conducted an in-depth analysis on the total number of publications and the total number of citations of soil science publications collected from Thomson ISI database. Results revealed an upsurge in soil science publication from 1970 to 2000 with no indication that this trend is slowing down. Increases in the number of citations with time are consistent with increases in the total number of publications (r = 0.93; p < 0.05). Results further revealed that the soil science publication in the Philippines is biased towards rice research particularly soil water with very few studies were published for plant nutrition and soil chemistry. The present study highlights the need for a paradigm shift in soil science research from mostly rice related research to environmental research. Ways to increase soil science publication among Filipino soil scientist's particularly in academic institutions is proposed. Finally, since only a few government-funded research have been published, future studies should stress on identifying factors that influence scientific productivity of most soil scientists in the Philippines. Addresses: [Navarrete, Ian A.] Univ Gottingen, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany. [Asio, Victor B.] Visayas State Univ, Dept Agron & Soil Sci, Baybay 6521, Leyte, Philippines. E-mail Addresses: ian-navarrete at daad-alumni.de Funding Acknowledgement: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation ( Bonn, Germany) Funding Text: The Alexander von Humboldt Foundation ( Bonn, Germany) has granted a research fellowship to Dr. Ian A. Navarrete during the course of this study. We thank Dr. Rotacio Gravoso who reviewed an earlier version of this manuscript. Cited Reference Count: 36 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300014 Cited References: Bronson KF, 1997, SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, V61, P981 Garrity D. P., 1993, Technologies for sustainable agriculture in the tropics: proceedings of two international symposia held in San Antonio, TX and Denver, CO, 1990 and 1991 respectively.Technologies for sustainable agriculture in the tropics: proceedings of two international symposia held in San Antonio, TX and Denver, CO, 1990 and 1991 respectively., P41 Asio V. B., 2009, Annals of Tropical Research, V31, P69 Asio V. B., 1997, Annals of Tropical Research, V19, P1 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Dobermann A, 2002, FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, V74, P37 Belder P, 2004, AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, V65, P193 VANDERGON HACD, 1995, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, V9, P11 Alcala A. C., 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Reforestation with Philippine Species, Baybay, Leyte, Philippines, Bouman BAM, 2005, AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, V74, P87 Hartemink A. E., 2002, Okubo Y, 1997, Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: methods and examples. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Navarrete Ian A., 2011, SOIL SCIENCE, V176, P699 Bouman BAM, 2001, AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, V49, P11 Cramb R. A., 2001, Soil conservation technologies for smallholder farming systems in the Philippine uplands: A socioeconomic evaluation, CULLITON BJ, 1988, SCIENCE, V241, P525 Lacanilao F, 1999, Diliman Review, V47, P11 Walker H. S., 1910, The sugar industry in the island of Negros, Chirici Gherardo, 2012, IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, V5, P101 Witt C, 1999, FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, V63, P113 Cassman KG, 1998, FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, V56, P7 Alcala A. C., 2004, ASEAN Biodiversity, V4, P26 Lim M., 1998, Science Diliman, V10, P1 Pendleton R. L., 1930, Soil science in the Philippines. Soil Science Society of America Journal, V11, P126 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56 Gyaneshwar P, 2002, PLANT AND SOIL, V245, P83 Navarrete Ian A., 2009, ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, V58, P1257 Kronzucker HJ, 1999, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, V119, P1041 Varela Diego, 2013, EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, V12, P245 Fleet CM, 2006, BIOSCIENCE, V56, P430 Vinluan Lorelei R., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V91, P277 Cassman KG, 1996, FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, V47, P1 Villalino N. A. P., 2012, Annals of Tropical Research, V34, P75 Valencia M. N., 2004, Science Diliman, V16, P49 Tabbal DF, 2002, AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, V56, P93 Navarrete Ian A., 2013, ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, V59, P625 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337157100007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Scientometric sorting by importance for literatures on life cycle assessments and some related methodological discussions Authors: Qian, G Author Full Names: Qian, Ge Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 19 (7):1462-1467; 10.1007/s11367-014-0747-9 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Betweenness centrality metric, Citation frequency, CiteSpace II, Document co-citation analysis, Life cycle assessments, Scientometric method KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH FIELD; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; COCITATION; VISUALIZATION; SCIENCE Abstract: This paper aims to sort the literatures on life cycle assessments (LCA) by their respective importance through citation and co-citation analysis and to further discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these kinds of scientometric methods in the case of LCA research. CiteSpace II was used to generate document co-citation networks based on 3,824 articles retrieved from the ISI Web of Science database on this topic. Table 1 provides the top 50 highest cited documents in the LCA field. Here, we use two indicators, i.e., citation frequency in citation analysis and betweenness centrality metric in co-citation analysis, to measure the importance of these LCA literatures. Citation and co-citation analysis are useful for environmental scientists and engineers to get a better understanding of the inner structure of LCA research. However, like all other research methods, this kind of analysis has some limitations. On the one hand, Scientometric studies and related software are very dependent on ISI Web of Science database, but considering the ISI Web of Science only began to track the LCA field fairly recently, the Scopus database would probably give a fuller picture. On the other hand, since the essence of scientometrics analysis is outsiders commenting insiders, so with only citation and co-citation analysis, to our understanding of the past, present, and future of LCA field, is insufficient. Addresses: Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Theoret Teaching & Res Dept, Humanities Coll, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: qiange at mail.shufe.edu.cn Funding Acknowledgement: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics) [2012110044] Funding Text: This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No. 2012110044). The author is very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors of the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment for their valuable comments and advices. Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY ISSN: 0948-3349 eISSN: 1614-7502 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences Research Areas: Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology IDS Number: AI8IT Unique ID: WOS:000337157100007 Cited References: SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Klopffer W, 2002, Int J Life Cycle Assess, V7, P311 Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 Ahlgren P, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P550 Leydesdorff Loet, 2007, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V58, P25 Qian Ge, 2013, CURRENT SCIENCE, V105, P1666 Newton I, 1965, On the shoulders of giants, Qian Ge, 2012, DISASTER ADVANCES, V5, P704 Cobo M. J., 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P146 Small HG, 1984, Scientometrics, V7, P391 MALIN MV, 1968, LIBRARY TRENDS, V16, P374 Leydesdorff Loet, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P1616 SMITH LC, 1981, LIBRARY TRENDS, V30, P83 BROOKS TA, 1986, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V37, P34 Freidberg Susanne, 2013, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, V42, P571 Qian Ge, 2013, JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGYInternational Conference on Agricultural, Food and Biological Engineering (ICAFBE), 2012, Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA, V7, P305 FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V1, P215 SMALL H, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICSEUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON SCIENTOMETRIC METHODS OF RESEARCH EVALUATION IN THE SCIENCES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, APR 13-17, 1991, POTSDAM, GERMANY, V26, P5 Hunt RG, 1996, Int J Life Cycle Assess, V1, P4 SMALL H, 1980, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V36, P183 Baumann H, 2002, J Ind Ecol, V6, P13 WHITE HD, 1981, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V32, P163 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 Narin F, 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, Garfield E, 1965, Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, Baumann H, 2002, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, V7, P2 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337120400004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A gender-based comparison of academic rank and scholarly productivity in academic neurological surgery Authors: Tomei, KL; Nahass, MM; Husain, Q; Agarwal, N; Patel, SK; Svider, PF; Eloy, JA; Liu, JK Author Full Names: Tomei, Krystal L.; Nahass, Meghan M.; Husain, Qasim; Agarwal, Nitin; Patel, Smruti K.; Svider, Peter F.; Eloy, Jean Anderson; Liu, James K. Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 21 (7):1102-1105; 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.006 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Academic productivity, Academic promotion, Academic rank determination, Academic rank in surgical specialties, Gender comparison, h-index, Surgical faculty productivity KeyWords Plus: H-INDEX; IMPACT; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; DISPARITIES; FACULTY; ISSUES; WOMEN; UNIVERSITY; CITATIONS; UROLOGY Abstract: The number of women pursuing training opportunities in neurological surgery has increased, although they are still underrepresented at senior positions relative to junior academic ranks. Research productivity is an important component of the academic advancement process. We sought to use the h-index, a bibliometric previously analyzed among neurological surgeons, to evaluate whether there are gender differences in academic rank and research productivity among academic neurological surgeons. The h-index was calculated for 1052 academic neurological surgeons from 84 institutions, and organized by gender and academic rank. Overall men had statistically higher research productivity (mean 13.3) than their female colleagues (mean 9.5), as measured by the h-index, in the overall sample (p < 0.0007). When separating by academic rank, there were no statistical differences (p > 0.05) in h-index at the assistant professor (mean 7.2 male, 6.3 female), associate professor (11.2 male, 10.8 female), and professor (20.0 male, 18.0 female) levels based on gender. There was insufficient data to determine significance at the chairperson rank, as there was only one female chairperson. Although overall gender differences in scholarly productivity were detected, these differences did not reach statistical significance upon controlling for academic rank. Women were grossly underrepresented at the level of chairpersons in this sample of 1052 academic neurological surgeons, likely a result of the low proportion of females in this specialty. Future studies may be needed to investigate gender-specific research trends for neurosurgical residents, a cohort that in recent years has seen increased representation by women. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Tomei, Krystal L.; Husain, Qasim; Agarwal, Nitin; Patel, Smruti K.; Svider, Peter F.; Eloy, Jean Anderson; Liu, James K.] Rutgers State Univ, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07102 USA. [Tomei, Krystal L.; Husain, Qasim; Agarwal, Nitin; Patel, Smruti K.; Svider, Peter F.; Eloy, Jean Anderson; Liu, James K.] Rutgers State Univ, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ 07102 USA. [Eloy, Jean Anderson; Liu, James K.] Rutgers State Univ, New Jersey Med Sch, Neurol Inst New Jersey, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA. [Nahass, Meghan M.] Rutgers State Univ, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Brunswick, NJ USA. E-mail Addresses: james.liu.md at rutgers.edu Cited Reference Count: 34 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND ISSN: 0967-5868 eISSN: 1532-2653 Web of Science Categories: Clinical Neurology; Neurosciences Research Areas: Neurosciences & Neurology IDS Number: AI7ZB Unique ID: WOS:000337120400004 Cited References: Rezek Issa, 2011, ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, V18, P1337 Carr PL, 1998, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V129, P532 Colaco Marc, 2013, JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, V190, P999 Engqvist Leif, 2008, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V23, P250 Benway Brian M., 2009, UROLOGY, V74, P30 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V148, P764 Sanfey HA, 2006, Arch Surg, V141, P1094 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P884 Benzil Deborah L., 2008, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V109, P378 Singh Aparajita, 2008, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, V103, P1589 Drinkwater Jess, 2008, MEDICAL EDUCATION, V42, P420 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2012, LARYNGOSCOPE, V122, P2690 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V149, P77 Woodrow Sarah I., 2006, NEUROSURGERY, V59, P749 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, V148, P215 Pagel P. S., 2011, ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, V55, P1085 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P118 Sanfey Hilary A., 2006, ARCHIVES OF SURGERYAnnual Meeting of the Virginia Chapter of the American-College-of-Surgeons, APR 29, 2005, Falls Church, VA, V141, P1086 Borman Karen R., 2007, AMERICAN SURGEON, V73, P161 Woodrow SI, 2006, Neurosurgery, V59, P755 Ferrada Paula A., 2011, AMERICAN SURGEON, V77, P1430 Carr PL, 2000, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V132, P889 Svider Peter F., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, V34, P464 Hunt Glenn E., 2010, HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, V18, P207 Kuehn Bridget M., 2012, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V307, P1899 Svider Peter F., 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P103 Poynard Thierry, 2011, CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, V35, P375 Reed Darcy A., 2011, ACADEMIC MEDICINE, V86, P43 Akl Elie A., 2012, CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, V184, PE602 Purvis Andy, 2006, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V21, P422 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Eloy Jean Anderson, 2013, LARYNGOSCOPE, V123, P1865 Schweitzer Laura, 2008, ACADEMIC MEDICINE, V83, P560 Lee Janet, 2009, JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, V111, P387 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337171300013 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation Authors: Lu, K; Ajiferuke, I; Wolfram, D Author Full Names: Lu, Kun; Ajiferuke, Isola; Wolfram, Dietmar Source: SCIENTOMETRICS, 100 (1):245-260; 10.1007/s11192-014-1274-y JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CITATION ANALYSIS; METRICS Abstract: The concept of citer analysis investigated earlier by Ajiferuke and Wolfram (In: B. Larsen, J. Leta (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI) pp. 798-808, 2009, Scientometrics 83:623-638, 2010) is extended to journals where different citing units (citers, citing articles, citing journals) are compared with the journal impact factor and each other to determine if differences in ranking arise from different measures. The citer measures for the 31 high impact journals studied from information science and library science are significantly correlated, even more so than the earlier citer analysis findings, indicating that there is a close relationship among the different units of measure. Still, notable differences in rankings for the journals examined were evident for the different measures used, especially from either 5-year impact factor or number of citing articles per publication to the number of citing journals per publication. The journals that are adversely affected seem to be those whose citations are concentrated in a few journals. This informed the need to develop a journal citation concentration index, which can serve as a complementary measure to the existing journal impact indices. Addresses: [Lu, Kun] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Bizzell Lib, Norman, OK 73019 USA. [Ajiferuke, Isola] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada. [Wolfram, Dietmar] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA. E-mail Addresses: iajiferu at uwo.ca Cited Reference Count: 26 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0138-9130 eISSN: 1588-2861 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AI8MQ Unique ID: WOS:000337171300013 Cited References: Rousseau R, 2002, LIBRARY TRENDS, V50, P418 Ioannidis John P. A., 2006, PLOS ONE, V1, Pendlebury David A., 2009, ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, V57, P1 Smalheiser N. R., 2009, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, V43, P1 Strotmann A., 2009, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V46, P1 Ajiferuke Isola, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2086 Zitt M, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS6th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUN 16-19, 1997, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V41, P255 GARFIELD E, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P195 Rousseau Ronald, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P413 Bergstrom Carl T., 2008, JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, V28, P11433 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Archambault Eric, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P635 Moed Henk F., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P367 DIEKS D, 1976, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V6, P247 MACROBERTS MH, 1989, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V40, P342 Franceschini Fiorenzo, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P203 PRATT AD, 1977, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V28, P285 Althouse B. M., 2008, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V60, P27 Ajiferuke Isola, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P623 Glanzel W, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 17, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V53, P171 Gonzalez-Pereira Borja, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P379 Egghe L., 2012, Scientometrics, P1 Ajiferuke Isola, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 212th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 14-17, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, V2, P798 Ajiferuke Isola, 2011, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V5, P292 Bollen J, 2005, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V41, P1419 Vanclay Jerome K., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V92, P211 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337165600095 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling Network Effects on Citations Authors: Biscaro, C; Giupponi, C Author Full Names: Biscaro, Claudio; Giupponi, Carlo Source: PLOS ONE, 9 (6):10.1371/journal.pone.0099502 JUN 9 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; PRODUCTIVITY; CREATIVITY; INNOVATION; MODELS; GROWTH Abstract: This paper analyzes the effects of the co-authorship and bibliographic coupling networks on the citations received by scientific articles. It expands prior research that limited its focus on the position of co-authors and incorporates the effects of the use of knowledge sources within articles: references. By creating a network on the basis of shared references, we propose a way to understand whether an article bridges among extant strands of literature and infer the size of its research community and its embeddedness. Thus, we map onto the article - our unit of analysis - the metrics of authors' position in the co-authorship network and of the use of knowledge on which the scientific article is grounded. Specifically, we adopt centrality measures - degree, betweenneess, and closeness centrality - in the co-authorship network and degree, betweenness centrality and clustering coefficient in the bibliographic coupling and show their influence on the citations received in first two years after the year of publication. Findings show that authors' degree positively impacts citations. Also closeness centrality has a positive effect manifested only when the giant component is relevant. Author's betweenness centrality has instead a negative effect that persists until the giant component - largest component of the network in which all nodes can be linked by a path - is relevant. Moreover, articles that draw on fragmented strands of literature tend to be cited more, whereas the size of the scientific research community and the embeddedness of the article in a cohesive cluster of literature have no effect. Addresses: [Biscaro, Claudio; Giupponi, Carlo] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, Venice, Italy. [Biscaro, Claudio] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Management, Venice, Italy. [Biscaro, Claudio] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Org & Globale Managementstudien, A-4040 Linz, Austria. E-mail Addresses: claudio.biscaro at jku.at Funding Acknowledgement: KULTURisk Project [FP7-ENV.2010.1.3.2-1-265280] Funding Text: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the KULTURisk Project (FP7-ENV.2010.1.3.2-1-265280). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Cited Reference Count: 45 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA ISSN: 1932-6203 Article Number: e99502 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AI8LF Unique ID: WOS:000337165600095 Cited References: Turner BL, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V100, P8074 Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 Blei David M., 2007, ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, V1, P17 Mazloumian A, 2011, Plos One, V6, Simonton DK, 1995, The nature of insight, P465 Wallace Matthew L., 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Polanyi M, 2000, MINERVA, V38, P1 Uddin Shahadat, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V90, P687 Larsen Peder Olesen, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P575 Goh KI, 2003, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V67, Newman M., 2010, Networks: An Introduction, Hargadon A, 1997, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V42, P716 Jose AM, 1996, WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTIONRegional Workshop on Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Asia and the Pacific, JAN 15-19, 1996, MANILA, PHILIPPINES, V92, P191 Chen CM, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5303 Yin Li-chun, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1599 Moretti E., 2012, The new geography of jobs, Blei David M., 2012, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, V55, P77 SIMON HA, 1973, AMERICAN SCIENTIST, V61, P394 Schilling MA, 2005, CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, V17, P131 Kaplan S, 2012, Economic, Sun XL, 2013, Scientific Reports, V3, Newman MEJ, 2009, Epl, V86, Yan Erjia, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P2107 Janssen Marco A., 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONSWorkshop on Vulnerability, Resilience and Adaptation, FEB, 2005, Tempe, AZ, V16, P240 Chang Jonathan, 2010, ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, V4, P124 Adger W. Neil, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONSWorkshop on Vulnerability, Resilience and Adaptation, FEB, 2005, Tempe, AZ, V16, P268 Dekas Kathryn H., 2013, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, V27, P219 Csardi G, 2006, InterJournal, Complex Systems, V1695, Dorta-Gonzalez P., 2013, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V7, P593 Burt RS, 2004, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V110, P349 Blei DM, 2003, JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH18th International Conference on Machine Learning, JUN 28-JUL 01, 2001, WILLIAMSTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, V3, P993 Bettencourt Luis M. A., 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P7301 Simonton DK, 1999, PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, V10, P309 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 Catmull E, 2008, How Pixar fosters collective creativity, Perry-Smith JE, 2006, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V49, P85 Janssen MA, 2007, Ecology and Society, V12, Frigotto M. Laura, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P397 Strzepek KM, 1996, CLIMATE RESEARCHWorkshop on Vulnerability and Adaptation of African Ecosystems to Global Climate Change, MAR 07-15, 1995, HARARE, ZIMBABWE, V6, P89 Ioannidis John P. A., 2006, PLOS ONE, V1, Uddin S, 2013, Plos One, V8, Heinze Thomas, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P811 Newman MEJ, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V98, P404 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Maske KL, 2003, ECONOMIC INQUIRY, V41, P555 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337922000011 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Axiomatic measures of intellectual influence Authors: Palacios-Huerta, I; Volij, O Author Full Names: Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio; Volij, Oscar Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 34 85-90; 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.02.011 MAY 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Intellectual influence, Rankings, Axiomatic approach KeyWords Plus: HIRSCH-INDEX; ECONOMICS; JOURNALS Abstract: Measuring influence allows the study of such issues as the impact and reputation of scientists and scientific publications, the dynamics of innovation, and the construction of ranking algorithms for search engines in the world wide web. Ranking methods that measure influence are typically based on the information contained in the network of communications between different entities (scholarly publications, patents, web pages). This paper presents within the same framework recent developments that use the axiomatic approach to derive ranking methods. Two related but essentially different ranking problems are studied: journal ranking problems and scholar ranking problems. The paper concludes with open theoretical and empirical questions for future research. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Addresses: [Volij, Oscar] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel. [Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio] London Sch Econ, London WC2A 2AE, England. [Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio] Univ Basque Country, Ikerbasque Fdn, Valencia, Spain. E-mail Addresses: i.palacios-huerta at lse.ac.uk; ovolij at bgu.ac.il Cited Reference Count: 12 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 0167-7187 eISSN: 1873-7986 Web of Science Categories: Economics Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AJ7ZT Unique ID: WOS:000337922000011 Cited References: GARFIELD E, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P471 Marchant Thierry, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P325 STIGLER GJ, 1995, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V103, P331 Chambers C.P., 2014, J. Econ. Theory, Ellison Glenn, 2013, AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, V5, P63 Jaffe A. B., 2002, Patents, citations and innovations, Woeginger Gerhard J., 2008, MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, V56, P224 Reny P., 2013, How to count citations if you must, Demange G., 2014, Theor. Econ., Posner R.A., 2000, Am. Law Econ. Rev., V2, Palacios-Huerta L, 2004, Econometrica, V72, P963 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337113400007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: ARCHITECTURAL LEVERAGE: PUTTING PLATFORMS IN CONTEXT Authors: Thomas, LDW; Autio, E; Gann, DM Author Full Names: Thomas, Llewellyn D. W.; Autio, Erkko; Gann, David M. Source: ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 28 (2):198-219; 10.5465/amp.2011.0105 MAY 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; 2-SIDED MARKETS; NETWORK EXTERNALITIES; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; COCITATION ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SYSTEMS COMPETITION; INNOVATION; STRATEGIES Abstract: The use of the term platform has proliferated in management research. However, theoretical work on the concept has lagged behind. We present a systematic review of the platform literature, identifying four distinct streams: organizational platforms, product family platforms, market intermediary platforms, and platform ecosystems. Each of these streams is characterized by a distinctive, although usually implied, theoretical logic. We elaborate on the theoretical logics of leverage and architectural openness, both of which underpin all four streams of platform research. We further discuss three distinctive leverage rationales exhibited in different platform variants-production, innovation, and transaction-and illustrate how platform ecosystems combine aspects of all three. We explain the meta-logic of architectural leverage to facilitate the purposive manipulation of platforms, providing a link between platform design features and sources of leverage. This provides a model that allows the different platform types to be placed into context with others. Finally, we outline how the concept of architectural leverage can be used to understand platform evolution. Addresses: [Thomas, Llewellyn D. W.] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Business, Innovat & Entrepreneurship Dept, London SW7 2AZ, England. [Autio, Erkko; Gann, David M.] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Business, London SW7 2AZ, England. E-mail Addresses: llewellyn.thomas at imperial.ac.uk; erkko.autio at imperial.ac.uk; d.gann at imperial.ac.uk Cited Reference Count: 130 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ACAD MANAGEMENT, PACE UNIV, PO BOX 3020, 235 ELM RD, BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8020 USA ISSN: 1558-9080 Web of Science Categories: Business; Management Research Areas: Business & Economics IDS Number: AI7WU Unique ID: WOS:000337113400007 Cited References: Jones N, 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V24, P1265 Gawer Annabelle, 2008, MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V49, P28 Ghemawat P, 2005, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V83, P98 Armstrong Mark, 2006, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSEuropean Meeting of the Econometric-Society, 2002, VENICE, ITALY, V37, P668 Caillaud B, 2003, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSConference on the Economics-of-the-Internet-and-Software-Industries, JAN, 2001, TOULOUSE, FRANCE, V34, P309 Schildt HA, 2006, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, V30, P399 Kim B, 2003, TECHNOVATION, V23, P371 Jiao Jianxin, 2007, JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, V18, P5 Venkatraman N, 2004, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V47, P876 Anderson SP, 2005, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, V72, P947 BARNEY J, 1991, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V17, P99 Halman JIM, 2003, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V20, P149 Gmur M, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V57, P27 Eisenmann T. R., 2009, Platforms, markets and innovation, P131 Winter SG, 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V24, P991 MEYER MH, 1993, SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V34, P29 Farrell J, 1998, JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, V7, P143 Richard PJ, 2005, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V47, P86 FARRELL J, 1986, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V76, P940 Meyer MH, 1997, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V43, P88 Thurow LC, 2000, ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, V570, P19 Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNALCCC/Tuck Conference on the Evolution of Firm Capabilities, SEP 25-26, 1999, HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE, V21, P1105 Nobeoka K, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V18, P169 Tranfield D, 2003, BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, V14, P207 Meyer MH, 1998, SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V40, P61 Hagiu Andrei, 2006, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSConference on Two-Sided Markets, JAN 23-24, 2004, Toulouse, FRANCE, V37, P720 Boudreau Kevin J., 2012, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V23, P1409 Martin Antoine, 2007, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, V10, P705 Iansiti M, 2004, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V82, P68 Evans D. S., 2006, Invisible engines: How software platforms drive innovation and transform industries, BRESNAHAN TF, 1995, JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICSConference in Honor of Zvi Griliches 60th Birthday, MAY, 1991, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, V65, P83 Gawer A., 2009, Platforms, markets and innovation, P45 Barnett-Page Elaine, 2009, BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, V9, FARRELL J, 1985, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V16, P70 WHEELWRIGHT SC, 1992, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V70, P70 CHRISTENSEN CM, 1995, RESEARCH POLICY, V24, P233 Crawley E., 2004, The influence of architecture on engineering systems, Porter M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance., Ceccagnoli Marco, 2012, MIS QUARTERLY, V36, P263 Kauffman RJ, 2004, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS35th International Conference on Systems Sciences, JAN, 2002, Kona, HI, V21, P137 Cennamo Carmelo, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V34, P1331 Sviokla J, 2005, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V83, P17 Muffatto M, 1999, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, V19, P449 Garud Raghu, 2008, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V29, P351 KOGUT B, 1994, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V36, P52 Cusumano MA, 2002, MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V43, P51 Utterback J. M., 1994, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Oliver Sandy R., 2008, HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, V11, P72 Kuhn T. S., 1962, The structure of scientific revolutions, Meyer MH, 2001, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V18, P188 Baldwin CY, 1997, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V75, P84 KATZ ML, 1986, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V94, P822 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Robertson D, 1998, SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V39, P19 Bresnahan TF, 1999, JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, V47, P1 Krishnan V, 2001, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V47, P52 Dahlander Linus, 2010, RESEARCH POLICY, V39, P699 Pine B. J., 1999, Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition, 2006, Dodgson M., 2008, The management of technological innovation, Suarez FF, 2004, RESEARCH POLICY, V33, P271 Meyer MH, 1996, SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V37, P43 Gawer Annabelle, 2007, JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, V16, P1 Jacobides Michael G., 2006, RESEARCH POLICY, V35, P1200 Distaso W, 2006, INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY31st Annual Conference of the European-Association-for-Research-in-Industrial-Economics, SEP 03, 2004, Berlin, GERMANY, V18, P87 KOGUT B, 1992, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V3, P383 KATZ ML, 1992, JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, V40, P55 Teece DJ, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V18, P509 Chen Jin, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, V14, P147 Baldwin C. Y., 2000, Design rules: The power of modularity, V1, Hagiu Andrei, 2007, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V85, P25 Ulrich K., 1994, Product design and development, West J, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY, V32, P1259 Tatikonda MV, 1999, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V16, P3 Gawer Annabelle, 2013, ORGANIZATION STUDIES, V34, P1035 MORRIS CR, 1993, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V71, P86 Bakos Yannis, 2008, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V25, P171 KATZ ML, 1985, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V75, P424 Kim DJ, 1996, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V7, P283 Rochet Jean-Charles, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, V1, Gawer A., 2002, Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation, Tiwana Amrit, 2010, INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, V21, P675 PRAHALAD CK, 1990, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V68, P79 Bierly Paul E., III, 2008, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V55, P393 Sawhney MS, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, V26, P54 Boudreau Kevin, 2010, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V56, P1849 Jiao J., 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, V54, P112 Rochet JC, 2002, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V33, P549 Chesbrough Henry W., 2007, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V50, P57 SANDERSON S, 1995, RESEARCH POLICY, V24, P761 Boudreau K., 2009, Platforms, markets and innovation, P163 Li Yan-Ru, 2009, TECHNOVATION, V29, P379 Dellarocas Chrysanthos, 2010, MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V51, P33 Baldwin C. Y., 2009, Platforms, markets and innovation, P19 KATZ ML, 1994, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, V8, P93 Ciborra CU, 1996, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V7, P103 Nambisan Satish, 2011, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, V25, P40 Shapiro C., 1999, Information Rules: a Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, TEECE DJ, 1986, RESEARCH POLICY, V15, P285 Eisenmann Thomas R., 2008, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V50, P31 Gawer Annabelle, 2014, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V31, P417 FARRELL J, 1988, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V19, P235 Meyer MH, 1999, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V17, P677 Hagiu Andrei, 2009, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V87, P74 2010, Academic Journal Quality Guide (Version 4), Laffont JJ, 1998, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V29, P38 Meyer M. H., 1997, The power of product platforms: Building value and cost leadership, Thomas James, 2008, BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, V8, Rochet Jean-Charles, 2006, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSConference on Two-Sided Markets, JAN 23-24, 2004, Toulouse, FRANCE, V37, P645 BROWN SL, 1995, ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V20, P343 Eisenmann Thomas, 2011, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V32, P1270 Robinson Douglas K. R., 2007, RESEARCH POLICY, V36, P871 Wortmann Hans, 2009, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V48, P188 Cusumano Michael, 2010, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, V53, P32 Economides Nicholas, 2006, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V52, P1057 HENDERSON RM, 1990, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, V35, P9 Simpson TW, 2004, AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, V18, P3 Meyer MH, 2002, JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, V19, P277 Brusoni S., 2009, Platforms, markets and innovation, P306 Simpson T. W., 2001, Research in Engineering Design, V13, P59 Garud R, 2006, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V17, P277 Zhu Feng, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V33, P88 Iyer Bala, 2008, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V86, P58 Muffatto M, 2002, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V24, P1 Muffatto M, 1999, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, V60-1, P145 McGrath M. E., 1995, Product strategy for high-technology companies, Eisenmann Thomas, 2006, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, V84, P92 Belleflamme Paul, 2009, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, V50, P245 Schildt HA, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P143 FARRELL J, 1992, JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, V40, P9 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337150100016 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Water research paradigm shifts in South Africa Authors: Siebrits, R; Winter, K; Jacobs, I Author Full Names: Siebrits, Raymond; Winter, Kevin; Jacobs, Inga Source: SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 110 (5-6):10.1590/sajs.2014/20130296 MAY-JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: research, paradigms, South Africa, horizon scanning, scientometrics KeyWords Plus: SCIENCE; SCIENTOMETRICS; INFORMETRICS; POLICY Abstract: We performed a scientometric analysis of water research publications extracted from four decades of South African related papers to identify paradigms and paradigm shifts within water research in South Africa. Between 1977 and 1991, research publications are dominated by research into technical and engineering solutions, as well as designs and plans to secure water supply. From 1992 to 2001, publications on water pollution, water quality, water resource management and planning are prominent. The second major paradigm is observed from 2001 to 2011 in which the emphasis is on planning, modelling, catchment-scale studies and a multidisciplinary approach to research. Another transition period, towards the end of 2011, is characterised by uncertainty, although it also shows the prominence of key concepts such as participation, governance and politics in water management. The second aim of this study was to identify and prioritise current and future water research questions through the participation of a wide range of researchers from across the country, and to relate these questions to research paradigms, issues and concerns in water in South Africa. Over 1600 questions were collected, reduced in number and then prioritised by specialists in the water sector. The majority (78%) of questions offered by respondents in the South African case study dealt with relatively short-to medium-term research requirements with 47% of questions focused on medium-term issues such as supplying water, service delivery and technical solutions. Addresses: [Siebrits, Raymond; Winter, Kevin] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa. [Jacobs, Inga] Water Res Commiss, Pretoria, South Africa. E-mail Addresses: kevin.winter at uct.ac.za Funding Acknowledgement: Water Research Commission [K5/2170] Funding Text: This publication was based on the Water Research Commission funded project K5/2170. The project leaders wish to thank the reference group participants, the workshop delegates who gave of their time to prioritise research questions and debate research in South Africa and the project staff who contributed in their specific tasks and fields. Cited Reference Count: 31 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ACAD SCIENCE SOUTH AFRICA A S S AF, PO BOX 72135, LYNWOOD RIDGE 0040, SOUTH AFRICA ISSN: 0038-2353 eISSN: 1996-7489 Article Number: 2013-0296 Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AI8GY Unique ID: WOS:000337150100016 Cited References: Klavans Richard, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P475 Funke Nikki, 2007, ENVIRONMENT, V49, P10 OHLSSON L, 2000, STOCKHOLM WATER FRON, V1, P10 FALLENMARK M, 2006, J WATER RES PL ASEC, V132, P129 BORNER K, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P5287 Rafols Ismael, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1871 SMALL H, 1993, SCIENTOMETRICSEUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON SCIENTOMETRIC METHODS OF RESEARCH EVALUATION IN THE SCIENCES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, APR 13-17, 1991, POTSDAM, GERMANY, V26, P5 LaRowe Gavin, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V79, P219 Siebrits R. M., 2014, Water SA, V40, P199 HEROLD C, 2009, 2009 DES MIDGL MEM L, ALLAN T, 1999, 1999 OXF U C WAT RES, Kuhn T. S., 1962, The structure of scientific revolutions, Hood WW, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V52, P291 TEMPELHOFF J, 2009, WATER HIST, V1, P81 Roessner D, 2000, RESEARCH EVALUATIONInternational Conference on Data and Strategies in Evaluating Research and Development, NOV 15-16, 1999, CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA, V9, P125 Allan JA, 2005, GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITIONConference on Resource Politics and Security in A Global Age, JUN, 2003, Sheffield, ENGLAND, V40, P181 Janssens Frizo, 2006, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V42, P1614 TAGUESUTCLIFFE J, 1992, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, V28, P1 Tewari D. D., 2009, WATER SA, V35, P693 POURIS A, 1998, R&D MANAGE, V18, P333 Sutherland William J., 2011, METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, V2, P238 Shackleton Charlie M., 2011, SOUTH AFRICAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, V93, P1 TURTON A, 2009, J TRANSDISCIPL RES S, V5, P9 TURTON A, 2002, HYDROPOLITICS DEV WO, Rafols Ismael, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V60, P1823 Sutherland William J., 2009, TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, V24, P523 Wallin JA, 2005, BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, V97, P261 Noyons ECM, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE4th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, OCT 05-07, 1995, ANTWERP, BELGIUM, V49, P68 VANVUUREN L, 2009, WATER WHEEL JUL, P38 SCHREINER B, 2006, P 2006 WAT I S AFR B, TODROV R, 1989, SCIENTOMETRICS, V15, P593 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337061800006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: ISI PERCEPTIONS AND HARD FACTS An Empirical Study from Taiwan Authors: Ching, GS Author Full Names: Ching, Gregory S. Edited by: Chou CP Source: SSCI SYNDROME IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOCAL OR GLOBAL PHENOMENON, 29 81-96; 2014 Book Series: Comparative and International Education Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; UNIVERSITIES; EDUCATION; SCIENCES; SYSTEM; INDEX Addresses: Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Grad Sch Educ Leadership & Dev, Taipei, Taiwan. Cited Reference Count: 48 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SENSE PUBLISHERS, PO BOX 21858, ROTTERDAM, 3001 AW, NETHERLANDS ISSN: 2214-9880 ISBN: 978-94-6209-405-5; 978-94-6209-407-9; 978-94-6209-406-2 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 IDS Number: BA5YL Unique ID: WOS:000337061800006 Cited References: D'Este Pablo, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V95, P481 Hilmer C. E., 2013, IZA Discussion Paper No. 6960, Hicks Diana, 2012, RESEARCH POLICY, V41, P251 Joseph H., 2012, College and Research Libraries News, V73, P83 Thomson Reuters, 2012, The history of citation indexing, Chen KH, 2004, ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, V28, P410 Keith B, 1999, AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, V36, P409 Weisberg H. F., 1996, An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis, Falagas Matthew E., 2008, FASEB JOURNAL, V22, P338 Curry Stephen, 2013, The inexorable rise of open access scientific publishing, Boyer Ernest L., 1990, Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Huang Arthur Hou-ming, 2009, INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, V10, P282 Glassick CE, 2000, ACADEMIC MEDICINE, V75, P877 TSSCI, 2012, TSSCI journal listing 2011, THCI, 2012, THCI journal search 2012, Leydesdorff Loet, 2009, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V61, P352 Thomson Reuters, 2010, ISI web of knowledge, Thelwall M, 2003, ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, V27, P333 Cronbach Lee J., 1951, Psychometrika, V16, P197 Chen C. R., 2013, Establishing a citation database for social science and humanities, Huang MH, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P419 Anderson Melissa S., 2007, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, V13, P437 Tien Flora F., 2007, BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, V28, P105 Diem Andrea, 2013, RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, V54, P86 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Cohen L, 2007, HASTAC, 2013, Pixels and print: Redefining academic publishing & scholarly communication 2012, Butler L, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 16-20, 2001, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, V32, P143 SCImago, 2007, SJR-SCImago journal and country rank, Dillman D. A., 2000, Online social sciences, Chen Kuan-Hsing, 2009, INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, V10, P206 Browman Howard I, 2008, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V8, P1 Chou CP, 2012, TAIWAN EDUCATION AT THE CROSSROAD: WHEN GLOBALIZATION MEETS LOCALIZATION, P1 Axinn WG, 2006, MIXED METHOD DATA COLLECTION STRATEGIES, P1 Thomson Reuters, 2012, Impact factor, Research Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences, 2013, Research institute for the humanities and social sciences introduction, Nunnally J. C., 1994, Psychometric theory, NSC, 2012, NSC research statistics 2012, Waymire Gregory B., 2012, Issues in Accounting Education, V27, P1077 Wen T. S., 2013, International Journal of Research Studies in Education, V2, P31 Watt J., 1997, Using the internet for quantitative survey research, ProQuest, 2013, About us 2012, Kao Chiang, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V78, P261 OASIS, 2012, Open access: What is it and why should we have it?, DOAJ, 2012, About DOAJ 2012, Chu Wan-wen, 2009, INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, V10, P275 Elsevier, 2013, Scopus 2013, Dirks A. L., 1998, The new definition of scholarship: How will it change the professoriate?, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337496800009 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Core research areas on addiction in Spain through the Web of Science bibliographic coupling analysis (2000-2013) Authors: Gonzalez-Alcaide, G; Calafat, A; Becona, E Author Full Names: Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio; Calafat, Amador; Becona, Elisardo Source: ADICCIONES, 26 (2):168-183; 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Article Author Keywords: bibliometrics, addiction, research areas, bibliographic coupling, intellectual structure KeyWords Plus: RESEARCH-FRONT; CITATION; DOCUMENTS; COCITATION; FIELD Abstract: The present study identifies the main Spanish core research areas in the area of addictions through the bibliographic coupling analysis of the publications at the Web of Science under the substance abuse heading. The bibliographic coupling methodology is the analytical procedure that determines the thematic-intellectual proximity of the documents under consideration through the identification of the shared or simultaneously cited bibliography by those documents. A factor analysis and network analysis have been carried out to cluster documents, graphically represent the existing core research areas, and analyse the interrelations between them. We have identified 30 core research areas. Alcohol is the topic of attention of 17 areas and cocaine has a strong presence in 6. Heroin and opiates are only present as prominent substances in 4 areas and cannabis and tobacco in other two for each substance. It has been found that there is a significant degree of fragmentation in the area, with the existence of numerous research foci but with few connections with each other and few documents showing shared common knowledge. Also noteworthy is the large number of emerging research areas, reflecting an incipient stage in many of the research topics. Consideration must be placed in promoting scientific consensus and cohesion of the discipline as well as to encouraging the consolidation of main lines that respond to the social problems and research challenges. Addresses: [Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio] Univ Valencia, Dept Hist Ciencia & Documentac, Valencia 46010, Spain. [Calafat, Amador; Becona, Elisardo] European Inst Studies Prevent IREFREA, Palma De Mallorca, Spain. [Becona, Elisardo] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Psicol Clin & Psicobiol, Santiago De Compostela, Spain. E-mail Addresses: gregorio.gonzalez at uv.es Cited Reference Count: 41 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SOCIDROGALCOHOL, RAMBLA 15, 2A, 3A,, PALMA DE MALLORCA, BALEARES 07003, SPAIN ISSN: 0214-4840 Web of Science Categories: Substance Abuse Research Areas: Substance Abuse IDS Number: AJ2OI Unique ID: WOS:000337496800009 Cited References: Jarneving B, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P245 Gonz?lez-Alcaide Gregorio, 2007, Adicciones, V19, P45 Aleixandre-Benavent R., 2012, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, V35, P94 Garcia Lopez J. A., 1999, European Journal of Epidemiology, V15, P23 MacRoberts MH, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V36, P435 Belles A., 2006, Adicciones, V18, P119 Jarneving B., 2013, Proceedings of the ISSI 2013 Viena. 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 15th to 19th July, 2013, Viena, Austria, P955 De Granda-Orive J. I., 2009, Gaceta Sanitaria, V23, Yuan Y., 2014, International Journal of Tourism Research, Osca Lluch J., 2012, Revista Espanola de Drogodependencias, V37, P9 Culebras-Fernandez J., 2008, NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, V23, P85 Youtie Jan, 2013, RESEARCH EVALUATION, V22, P145 Huang Mu-Hsuan, 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P1721 Jarneving B, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V50, P365 Meyer M., 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P473 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Jarneving Bo, 2007, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V1, P287 Boyack Kevin W., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P2389 Small Henry, 2009, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V3, P332 Jarneving B., 2007, Journal of Informetrics, V1, P338 Arciniega LT, 1997, ADDICTION, V92, P1639 Gonzalez-Alcaide G., 2006, Trastornos Adictivos, V8, P78 Calafat A., 2006, Addiction, V101, P638 Gonzalez-Alcaide G., 2008, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Gientifica, V31, P344 SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 Czerwon H. J., 1995, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, P167 Glanzel W, 1996, SCIENTOMETRICS, V37, P195 Upham S. Phineas, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V83, P15 Castellano-Gomez M., 2003, Adicciones, V15, P309 Glanzel Wolfgang, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA, V91, P399 Gonzalez Alcaide Gregorio, 2008, Adicciones, V20, P337 Long Janet C., 2012, BMJ OPEN, V2, Sanchez-Carbonell X, 2005, ADDICTION, V100, P1166 Boyack Kevin W., 2014, JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V65, P670 Vogel Rick, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, V15, P426 LIU MX, 1993, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V49, P370 KESSLER MM, 1963, AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION, V14, P10 Arbinaga F., 2002, Adicciones, V14, P139 Nicolaisen Jeppe, 2012, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V6, P276 Echeburua Enrique, 2010, ADICCIONES, V22, P91 Kuusi Osmo, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P759 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337454800001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Structure of Small World Innovation Network and Learning Performance Authors: Song, S; Chen, XD; Zhang, GP Author Full Names: Song, Shuang; Chen, Xiangdong; Zhang, Gupeng Source: MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 10.1155/2014/860216 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article KeyWords Plus: DYNAMICS; CLUSTERS; INDUSTRIES; MANAGEMENT; EVOLUTION; SCIENCE; WEB Abstract: This paper examines the differences of learning performance of 5 MNCs (multinational corporations) that filed the largest number of patents in China. We establish the innovation network with the patent coauthorship data by these 5 MNCs and classify the networks by the tail of distribution curve of connections. To make a comparison of the learning performance of these 5 MNCs with differing network structures, we develop an organization learning model by regarding the reality as having m dimensions, which denotes the heterogeneous knowledge about the reality. We further set n innovative individuals that are mutually interactive and own unique knowledge about the reality. A longer (shorter) distance between the knowledge of the individual and the reality denotes a lower (higher) knowledge level of that individual. Individuals interact with and learn from each other within the small-world network. By making 1,000 numerical simulations and averaging the simulated results, we find that the differing structure of the small-world network leads to the differences of learning performance between these 5 MNCs. The network monopolization negatively impacts and network connectivity positively impacts learning performance. Policy implications in the conclusion section suggest that to improve firm learning performance, it is necessary to establish a flat and connective network. Addresses: [Song, Shuang; Chen, Xiangdong] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China. [Song, Shuang] Beihang Univ, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China. [Zhang, Gupeng] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Technol Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: zhanggupeng at 163.com Funding Acknowledgement: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71173009]; Beijing Natural Science Foundation [9144036]; Ministry of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences Project [13YJC630219] Funding Text: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC: 71173009), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (9144036), and Ministry of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences Project (13YJC630219). Cited Reference Count: 53 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: HINDAWI PUBLISHING CORPORATION, 410 PARK AVENUE, 15TH FLOOR, #287 PMB, NEW YORK, NY 10022 USA ISSN: 1024-123X eISSN: 1563-5147 Article Number: 860216 Web of Science Categories: Engineering, Multidisciplinary; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications Research Areas: Engineering; Mathematics IDS Number: AJ1ZP Unique ID: WOS:000337454800001 Cited References: Spielman David J., 2011, AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, V28, P195 Zhang Luwen, 2011, BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, V5, van der Valk Tessa, 2011, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, V78, P25 Amaral LAN, 2000, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V97, P11149 Davis G.F., 2003, Strategic Organization, V1, Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 SEGLEN PO, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P628 Albert R, 1999, NATURE, V401, P130 Guan Jiancheng, 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, V93, P609 Goyal S, 2006, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, V114, P403 Uzzi Brian, 2007, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V4, P77 Iravani Seyed M. R., 2007, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, V53, P1102 Oakey Ray, 2007, R & D MANAGEMENT, V37, P237 Newman MEJ, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Carstens C. J., 2013, MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, Milgram S., 1967, Psychology Today, V2, P60 Hung Shiu-Wan, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V82, P121 Kleinberg JM, 2000, NATURE, V406, P845 Fleming Lee, 2006, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, V48, P6 Office of Technology Assessment United States Congress, 1985, Information Technology R&D: Critical Trends and Issues Summary, New York, NY, USA, Fowler J. H., 2005, Social Logic of Politics, Zhang Gupeng, 2014, SCIENTOMETRICS, V98, P945 Feldman MP, 2005, REGIONAL STUDIES, V39, P129 Verspagen B, 2004, TECHNOVATION, V24, P563 Orihata M, 2000, TECHNOVATION, V20, P437 Liu Xiaohui, 2007, RESEARCH POLICY, V36, P355 Baum JAC, 2003, INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGEConference on Institutions and Organizations, JUL, 2002, LUCCA, ITALY, V12, P697 Chen Zifeng, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P97 Watts DJ, 1999, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, V105, P493 Hellmann Tim, 2014, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, V234, P583 Watts DJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P440 Choi Jinho, 2013, EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, V40, P4511 Giuliani E, 2005, RESEARCH POLICY, V34, P47 Chen Pengpeng, 2013, MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, Asheim B., 2002, Journal of Technology Transfer, V27, P77 David H. A., 1981, Order Statistics, Li Zhang-Wei, 2013, MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, Hermans Frans, 2013, RESEARCH POLICY, V42, P613 Boschma RA, 1999, RESEARCH POLICY, V28, P853 Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 Bjorneborn Lennart, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, JUL, 2005, Stockholm, SWEDEN, V68, P395 Fleming Lee, 2007, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V18, P938 Kogut B, 2001, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V66, P317 Gilbert Nigel, 2007, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONSConference on Social Network Analysis and Complexity, JUL 31-AUG 02, 2006, Budapest, HUNGARY, V378, P100 Humphries MD, 2006, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V273, P503 Shin Juneseuk, 2010, TECHNOVATION, V30, P612 Dodgson M., 1994, Hargadon A., 2003, How Breakthroughs Happen, Watts D. J., 1999, Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness, March James G., 1991, ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, V2, P71 Zhang L., 2009, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE '09), June, 2009, P1 Humphries Mark D., 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, Zhang Luwen, 2010, JOURNAL OF GENETICS, V89, P73 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337981900002 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: "Classic Papers" on Aquatic Humic Substances: Use of the Hirsch Index Authors: Thurman, EM; Ferrer, I Author Full Names: Thurman, E. Michael; Ferrer, Imma Edited by: RosarioOrtiz F Source: ADVANCES IN THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER: IMPACT ON NATURAL AND ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, 1160 7-25; 2014 Book Series: ACS Symposium Series Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: Symp on Physicochemical Characterization of Organic Matter: Past, Present, Future, and Role of Environment / 245th Natl Spring Meeting of the Amer-Chem-Soc (ACS) Conference Date: APR 07-11, 2013 Conference Location: New Orleans, LA Conference Sponsors: Amer Chem Soc, Div Chem Educ Abstract: Citation impact data from the journals, Science and Nature, are used as a benchmark for defining a classic paper with a new application of the journal Hirsch-index, hi. The h(j)-index was first published eight years ago as a citation metric of journal impact. Here we use the hi-index, to measure not only the impact of a journal, but also to measure the impact of papers within a journal. Next the h(j)-index is applied to the field of environmental science with an example of "citation classics" dealing with aquatic humic substances from a 50-year record and a field of >20,000 journal articles. We hypothesize that the h(j)-index may be readily calculated for any scientific paper, regardless of its age or field of activity, to gauge its past, present, or future citation-impact and that of its author. Addresses: [Thurman, E. Michael; Ferrer, Imma] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA. E-mail Addresses: mthurman at ono.com Cited Reference Count: 9 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: AMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 SIXTEENTH ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA ISSN: 0097-6156 ISBN: 978-0-8412-2951-8 Web of Science Categories: Geochemistry & Geophysics; Environmental Sciences Research Areas: Geochemistry & Geophysics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology IDS Number: BA8DE Unique ID: WOS:000337981900002 Cited References: Braun Tibor, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P169 Ciriminna Rosaria, 2013, CHEMISTRY CENTRAL JOURNAL, V7, Bollen Johan, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P669 FAIRTHOR.RA, 1969, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V25, P319 GARFIELD E, 1977, CURRENT CONTENTS, P5 Garfield E., 1984, Curr. Contents, V23, P175 Tsay MY, 1998, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V49, P1283 GARFIELD E, 1986, CURRENT CONTENTS, P3 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000334314900003 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Modelling Epistemic Systems Authors: Martins, ACR Author Full Names: Martins, Andre C. R. Edited by: Dabbaghian V; Mago VK Source: THEORIES AND SIMULATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 52 19-30; 10.1007/978-3-642-39149-1_3 2014 Book Series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library Language: English Document Type: Article; Book Chapter KeyWords Plus: CONTINUOUS OPINIONS; HERD BEHAVIOR; DYNAMICS; SCIENCE; REPLICATION; EVOLUTION; NETWORKS; INDEX Abstract: In this Chapter, I will explore the use of modeling in order to understand how Science works. I will discuss the modeling of scientific communities, providing a general, non-comprehensive overview of existing models, with a focus on the use of the tools of Agent-Based Modeling and Opinion Dynamics. A special attention will be paid to models inspired by a Bayesian formalism of Opinion Dynamics. The objective of this exploration is to better understand the effect that different conditions might have on the reliability of the opinions of a scientific community. We will see that, by using artificial worlds as exploring grounds, we can prevent some epistemological problems with the definition of truth and obtain insights on the conditions that might cause the quest for more reliable knowledge to fail. A simple model of scientific agents opinions influenced by colleagues and experimental results about the world they live in will also be discussed. Addresses: Univ Sao Paulo, GRIFE EACH, BR-1000 Sao Paulo, Brazil. E-mail Addresses: amartins at usp.br Cited Reference Count: 94 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY ISSN: 1868-4394 ISBN: 978-3-642-39149-1; 978-3-642-39148-4 Book DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39149-1 Web of Science Categories: Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence Research Areas: Computer Science IDS Number: BA3KB Unique ID: WOS:000334314900003 Cited References: Payette Nicolas, 2011, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V14, Martins Andre C. R., 2009, JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, Garfield E., 1964, The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science, Cho MK, 2006, SCIENCE, V311, P614 Doran Jim, 2011, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V14, Ioannidis JPA, 2005, PLOS MEDICINE, V2, P696 Radicchi Filippo, 2009, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V80, Hegselmann Rainer, 2006, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V9, Lane D., 1997, The Economy as an Evolving Complex System I, P105 Maher P., 1993, Betting on theories, Galam Serge, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V89, P365 Vicente R., 2009, J. Stat. Mech Theory Exp., V2009, Talbott W., 2008, Bayesian epistemology. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Pious S., 1993, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, Gilbert N., 1997, Sociol. Res. Online, V2, Giles Jim, 2006, NATURE, V442, P344 GALAM S, 1982, JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, V9, P1 Bovens L., 2003, Bayesian epistemology, Martins A. C. R., 2012, Social Physics Catena, P146 Simkin Mikhail V., 2007, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V58, P1661 Hubbard R., 1994, Int. J. Res. Mark, V11, P233 Si Xia-Meng, 2010, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V389, P3711 Begley C. Glenn, 2012, NATURE, V483, P531 Kuhn T. S., 1962, The structure of scientific revolutions, Hume D., 1777, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Martins A.C.R., 2005, JASSS-J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., V8, P3 Galam S., 2006, Econophysics and Sociophysics: Trends and Perspectives, P363 Klein P., 2002, Vega-Redondo F., 2007, Complex Social Network, Jeffrey R. C., 1983, The logic of decision, Simkin M.V., 2005, Annals Improb. Res, V11, P24 Martins Andre C. R., 2006, JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING JOURNAL, V1, P108 2012, MODELS OF SCIENCE DYNAMICS: ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN COMPLEXITY THEORY AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, P1 Martins A. C. R., 2005, Cogprint preprint, Kemp Charles, 2010, COGNITION, V114, P165 Squazzoni Flaminio, 2011, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V14, Sobkowicz Pawel, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P233 Pickering A., 1984, Constructing quarks: a sociological history of particle physics, Sarewitz Daniel, 2012, NATURE, V485, P149 Orlean A, 1995, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATIONWorkshop on the Emergence and Stability of Institutions, DEC, 1992, LOUVAIN, BELGIUM, V28, P257 Martins A.C.R., 2010, Adv. Appl. Stat. Sci., V2, P333 Hegselmann R., 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., V5, P3 Sobkowicz P., 2010, ArXiv:0810.0486v1, Naveh I., 2006, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, V12, Howson C., 2003, Hume's Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief, effuant G., 2002, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, V5, Martins Andre C. R., 2012, XI BRAZILIAN MEETING ON BAYESIAN STATISTICS (EBEB 2012)11th Brazilian Meeting on Bayesian Statistics (EBEB), MAR 18-22, 2012, Amparo, BRAZIL, V1490, P212 Newman M. E. J., 2009, EPL, V86, Martins Andre C. R., 2009, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V388, P3225 Sznajd-Weron K, 2000, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, V11, P1157 Bloor D, 1991, Knowledge and social imagery, Ioannidis JPA, 2005, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V294, P218 Galam S, 2005, EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, V70, P705 Check E, 2005, NATURE, V438, P1056 Evanschitzky Heiner, 2007, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, V60, P411 Borner K, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5266 Earman J., 1992, Bayes or Bust: A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Howson C., 1993, Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach, Yilmaz Levent, 2011, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V14, Latour Bruno, 1986, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Martins Andre C. R., 2010, ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, V13, P621 Barabasi AL, 2002, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V311, P590 Ren Fu-Xin, 2012, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V391, P3533 Egghe Leo, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P131 Vitanov Nikolay K., 2012, MODELS OF SCIENCE DYNAMICS: ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN COMPLEXITY THEORY AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, P69 Herrera Mark, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, Barnes B., 1982, Rationality and Relativism, P21 Martins Andre C. R., 2010, ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, V13, P519 Zollman K., 2011, JASSS-J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., V14, P4 Kondratiuk P., 2011, Arxiv, preprint 1106.0438, Edmonds Bruce, 2011, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V14, Galam S., 2010, Physica A, V17, P3619 Edmonds Bruce, 2011, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V14, Martins Andre C. R., 2008, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V78, BANERJEE AV, 1992, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V107, P797 Press S. J., 2001, The Subjectivity of Scientists and the Bayesian Approach, Castellano Claudio, 2009, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, V81, P591 Martins Andre C. R., 2008, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V11, Newman MEJ, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Martins Andre C. R., 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, V19, P617 Parinov Sergey, 2011, JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, V14, Gettier Edmund L., 1963, Analysis, V23, P121 Quattrociocchi W., 2011, ArXiv preprint:1102.0257, Tenenbaum Joshua B., 2007, INDUCTIVE REASONING: EXPERIMENTAL, DEVELOPMENTAL, AND COMPUTATIONAL APPROACHES, P167 HARDWIG J, 1985, JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, V82, P335 Egghe L., 1990, Introduction to Infometrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Newman MEJ, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V98, P404 Palmer V., 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., V9, P14 Kaplan M., 2002, Shope R. K., 2002, Newman M. E. J., 2006, The Structure and Dynamics of Networks, Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Kaplan M., 1996, Decision theory as philosophy, Jeffrey Richard, 2004, Subjective Probability, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000337623300077 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A Study on Characteristics of the Papers on International Bauhaus Research in Recent 50 Years-Based on the Database of Web of Science Authors: Ye, J; Yang, ZX; Cao, ZJ Author Full Names: Ye, Jing; Yang, Zhi-xiang; Cao, Zeng-jie Book Group Author(s): DEStech Publicat, Inc Source: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, NETWORK SECURITY AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (CNSCE 2014), 441-451; 2014 Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 1st International Conference on Computer, Network Security and Communication Engineering (CNSCE) Conference Date: FEB 22-23, 2014 Conference Location: Shenzhen, PEOPLES R CHINA Author Keywords: Bauhaus, Research properties, Bibliometrics Abstract: This paper studies the index subjects of the five sub-databases of Web of Science during 1963 similar to 2012, with the keyword of "bauhaus", based on the methodology of bibliometrics. The analysis demonstrates that, from the perspective of metrology, this study has witnessed its two peaks of research in recent 50 years, while the study has been increasing in recent years; research institutes are mainly located in the United States and Germany, while most of the research in Asia comes from Japan; in China, research results appeared in 2006 for the first time, proceedings papers being the main type of papers. Compared with its real impact on the design world in at the beginning of the 20th century, it is hold that there is not much attention to the Bauhaus Research from international academics since the 1960s. Addresses: [Ye, Jing; Cao, Zeng-jie] China Acad Art, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. E-mail Addresses: 65640202 at qq.com; 185449565 at qq.com; caozj at 126.com Cited Reference Count: 5 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: DESTECH PUBLICATIONS, INC, 439 DUKE STREET, LANCASTER, PA 17602-4967 USA ISBN: 978-1-60595-167-6 IDS Number: BA7LD Unique ID: WOS:000337623300077 Cited References: SMALL H, 1973, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V24, P265 SALTON G, 1979, JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, V35, P1 Qiu Jun-ping, 1988, Bibliometrics, P22 Chen CM, 2003, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V54, P435 Lampugnani V.M., 1983, Hatje-Lexikon der Architektur des 20, P54 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM Thu Jul 31 16:12:54 2014 From: eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM (Eugene Garfield) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:12:54 +0000 Subject: PAPERS OF POSSIBLE INTEREST TO READERS OF THE SIG-METRICS LIST Message-ID: *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338279800006 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Orphan drugs and rare diseases: a scientometric review (2000-2014) Authors: Chen, CM; Dubin, R; Kim, MC Author Full Names: Chen, Chaomei; Dubin, Rachael; Kim, Meen Chul Source: EXPERT OPINION ON ORPHAN DRUGS, 2 (7):709-724; 10.1517/21678707.2014.920251 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: CiteSpace, orphan drugs, rare diseases, scientometrics KeyWords Plus: PULMONARY ARTERIAL-HYPERTENSION; NIJMEGEN BREAKAGE SYNDROME; DNA-DAMAGE RESPONSE; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; EMERGING TRENDS; BREAST-CANCER; ATM; ASSOCIATION; COMPLEX; CHALLENGES Abstract: Introduction: The literature of orphan drugs and rare diseases between 2000 and 2014 is reviewed. The overall structure of its intellectual landscape is characterized in terms of thematic concentrations of co-cited references and emerging trends of surging keywords and citations to references through a scientometric review - a quantitative study of scientific literature. Areas covered: The review is based on two sets of bibliographic records retrieved from the Web of Science. The core dataset, consisting of 9461 original research articles and review papers, was constructed from a topic search. The expanded dataset, consisting of 82,765 articles and reviews, was constructed by citation expansion. Expert opinion: The study has revealed three broad categories of research. The research policy category focuses on the strategic and integral role of the study of orphan drugs and rare diseases in a wide-ranging societal context, including optimizing the allocation of resources and setting appropriate evaluation standards. The basic research category focuses on understanding the complex biological and genetic mechanisms of rare diseases. The disease-specific research category focuses on specific rare diseases with clinical and therapeutic goals. The study has revealed the fundamental role of genetic variation in linking a diverse range of rare and complex phenotypic patterns. The field would benefit from more comprehensive reviews of all three categories as a whole and disseminating findings and technical advances across various specialties. Finally, building stronger connections between the study of rare diseases and the study of more common diseases is recommended for all three categories. Addresses: [Chen, Chaomei; Dubin, Rachael; Kim, Meen Chul] Drexel Univ, Coll Comp & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. E-mail Addresses: chaomei.chen at drexel.edu Cited Reference Count: 61 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: INFORMA HEALTHCARE, TELEPHONE HOUSE, 69-77 PAUL STREET, LONDON EC2A 4LQ, ENGLAND ISSN: 2167-8707 Web of Science Categories: Pharmacology & Pharmacy Research Areas: Pharmacology & Pharmacy IDS Number: AK2WG Unique ID: WOS:000338279800006 Cited References: ARNO PS, 1995, MILBANK QUARTERLY, V73, P231 SALVADORI B, 1994, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, V30A, P930 Risch NJ, 2000, NATURE, V405, P847 Buckley Brendan M., 2008, LANCET, V371, P2051 Chen CM, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V57, P359 Lander ES, 2001, NATURE, V409, P860 Barrett JC, 2005, BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P263 Hugot JP, 2001, NATURE, V411, P599 Terwilliger JD, 2000, HUMAN BIOLOGYSymposium on Anthropological Genetics in the 21st Century at the 14th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, JUL27, 1998, WILLIAMSBURG, VA, V72, P63 Zhao S, 2000, NATURE, V405, P473 Rubin LJ, 2002, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V346, P896 Lim DS, 2000, NATURE, V404, P613 Barst RJ, 1996, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V334, P296 Risch N, 1996, SCIENCE, V273, P1516 McCabe C, 2006, QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V99, P341 Paul Steven M., 2010, NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, V9, P203 Bertram Lars, 2010, NEURON, V68, P270 Reis Abilio, 2010, REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, V29, P253 Cheung Richard Y, 2004, Health law journal, V12, P183 Peltonen L, 2000, NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, V1, P182 Griggs Robert C., 2009, MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, V96, P20 Schultz LB, 2000, JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, V151, P1381 Gatei M, 2000, NATURE GENETICS, V25, P115 Neyroud N, 1997, NATURE GENETICS, V15, P186 Carney JP, 1998, CELL, V93, P477 Chen Chaomei, 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1386 Kesselheim Aaron S., 2011, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V305, P2320 Girgis Reda E., 2010, EXPERT OPINION ON EMERGING DRUGS, V15, P71 Simonneau G, 2004, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGYThird World Symposium on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, JUN 23-25, 2003, Venice, ITALY, V43, P5S Burt Christiana, 2010, CURRENT VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, V8, P412 KAPLAN EL, 1958, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, V53, P457 Antzelevitch C, 2005, CIRCULATION, V111, P659 Haffner ME, 2002, NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, V1, P821 Wu XH, 2000, NATURE, V405, P477 Zhou BBS, 2000, NATURE, V408, P433 Galie Nazzareno, 2010, REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, V63, P708 RICH S, 1987, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V107, P216 Kleinberg J., 2002, Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, July, 2002, Alberta, P91 Channick RN, 2001, LANCET, V358, P1119 Simonneau Gerald, 2009, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY4th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, FEB, 2008, Dana Point, CA, V54, PS43 GARFIELD E, 1955, SCIENCE, V122, P108 Marckmann Peter, 2006, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, V17, P2359 Shiloh Y, 2000, COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGYCold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 2000, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, V65, P527 Rioux JD, 2001, NATURE GENETICS, V29, P223 Jorde LB, 2000, HUMAN HEREDITY, V50, P57 Jorde LB, 2000, GENOME RESEARCH, V10, P1435 Purcell Shaun, 2007, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, V81, P559 BRUGADA P, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, V20, P1391 Humbert M, 2006, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, V173, P1023 Chen Chaomei, 2012, EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, V12, P593 SMALL HG, 1977, SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, V7, P139 Zheng L, 2000, ONCOGENE, V19, P6159 Fentiman IS, 2006, LANCET, V367, P595 Kastan MB, 2000, NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, V1, P179 Drummond Michael F., 2007, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARERoundtable Meeting on Use of Health Economics for Orphan Drugs, DEC16, 2005, London, ENGLAND, V23, P36 DALONZO GE, 1991, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V115, P343 Rinaldi A, 2005, EMBO REPORTS, V6, P507 Dear James W., 2006, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, V62, P264 Anderson Joe R., 2010, CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, V18, P148 KERR GS, 1994, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, V120, P919 Chen Chaomei, 2013, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V25, P619 =================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338216100007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Characteristics and trends of *research* on positron emission tomography: a bibliometric analysis, 2002-2012 Authors: Baek, S; Yoon, DY; Min, KJ; Lim, KJ; Seo, YL; Yun, EJ Author Full Names: Baek, Sora; Yoon, Dae Young; Min, Kyung Joon; Lim, Kyoung Ja; Seo, Young Lan; Yun, Eun Joo Source: ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 28 (5):455-462; 10.1007/s12149-014-0836-7 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: PET, Research, Publications, Bibliometrics KeyWords Plus: JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; RADIOLOGY RESEARCH; RESEARCH ARTICLES; NUCLEAR-MEDICINE; PUBLICATION; ONCOLOGY; AUTHORSHIP; PUBLISH Abstract: We performed a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications focused on positron emission tomography (PET) over a 10-year period. The MEDLINE and ISI Web of Knowledge databases were searched for English language original articles focused on PET in SCI/SCIE-indexed journals in 2002, 2007, and 2012. We selected the documents with titles that included "PET" or "positron emission." The following information was obtained from each article: journal (year of publication, title, subject category, and *impact factor*), subspecialty, imaging modality used, tracer, species, sample size, number of authors, affiliation of the first author, declared funding, and country of origin. The yearly publication on PET increased from 547 (2002) to 986 (2007), and 1838 (2012). A total of 1753 (52.0 %) articles were published in journals in the "Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging" category, 1512 (44.9 %) were in the subspecialty of oncology, 3245 (96.3 %) used PET or PET/CT, 1698 (50.4 %) used 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) as the radiotracer, 2378 (70.5 %) were human studies, 1294 (38.4 %) had a sample size of < 20, 1674 (49.7 %) had > 7 authors, 779 (23.1 %) were written by a first author from a department of nuclear medicine, and 1337 (39.7 %) were supported by government funding. The United States published 948 studies (28.1 %) followed by Japan (345, 10.2 %) and Germany (335, 9.9 %). In the time trend analysis oncology subspecialty, PET/MR as the imaging modality, FDG as the tracer, sample size > 50, number of authors > 7, radiology department affiliation of the first author, and government funding exhibited significantly positive trends. The number of publication concerning PET has increased rapidly over the last decade. This bibliometric analysis revealed characteristics and trends of current PET research that provides useful information to researchers. Addresses: [Baek, Sora] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Kangdong Seong Sim Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul 134701, South Korea. [Yoon, Dae Young; Min, Kyung Joon; Lim, Kyoung Ja; Seo, Young Lan; Yun, Eun Joo] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Kangdong Seong Sim Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul 134701, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: evee0914 at chollian.net Cited Reference Count: 28 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA ISSN: 0914-7187 eISSN: 1864-6433 Web of Science Categories: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Research Areas: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging IDS Number: AK1YU Unique ID: WOS:000338216100007 Cited References: Ingram T G, 1992, Family medicine, V24, P303 Andersen Julia, 2006, Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection, V39, P436 Rahman M, 2002, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V347, P1211 Hwang SS, 2003, RADIOLOGY, V226, P16 Greenbelt M, 2011, PET imaging market summary report IMV, Lim Kyoung Ja, 2012, RADIOLOGY, V264, P796 LUUKKONEN T, 1990, ANNALS OF MEDICINE, V22, P145 Fang Ferric C., 2009, INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, V77, P929 Falagas Matthew E., 2006, MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, V81, P1401 Garg A. X., 2006, KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, V70, P1995 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Hricak Hedvig, 2010, RADIOLOGY, V257, P498 Itagaki MW, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V237, P774 Rahman M, 2002, ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, V16, P383 Signore A, 2004, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, V31, P882 Donovan Arthur J., 2010, SURGERY, V147, P5 Rahman M, 2003, PUBLIC HEALTH, V117, P274 Seglen PO, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P498 Miguel-Dasit Alberto, 2008, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, V67, P384 Fletcher James W., 2008, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, V49, P480 Vinardell M. Pajares, 2007, REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR, V26, P345 Beyer T, 2000, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, V41, P1369 RIESENBERG D, 1990, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V264, P1857 Falagas Matthew E., 2008, FASEB JOURNAL, V22, P2623 Chen Ran-Chou, 2009, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, V37, P319 Friedenberg RM, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V220, P296 Histed Stephanie N., 2012, NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, V33, P349 Yun Eun Joo, 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, V200, PW560 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000331413000001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: How far has The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine advanced in terms of journal metrics? Authors: Huh, S Author Full Names: Huh, Sun Source: KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 28 (6):635-638; 10.3904/kjim.2013.28.6.635 NOV 2013 Language: English Document Type: Article Abstract: The Korean journal of Internal Medicine has already been valued as an international journal, according to a citation analysis in 2011. Now, 2 years later, I would like to confirm how much the Journal has advanced from the point of view of journal metrics by looking at the *impact factor*, cites per document (2, years), SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), and the Hirsch index. These were obtained from a variety of databases, such as the Korean Medical Citation Index, KoreaMed Synapse, Web of Science, JCR Web, and SCImago Journal & Country Rank. The manually calculated 2012 *impact factor* was 1.252 in. the Web of Science, with a ranking of 7051 (46.4%) in the category of general and internal medicine. Cites per documents (2 years) for 2012 was 1.619, with a ranking of 267/1,588 (16.8%) in. the category of medicine (miscellaneous). The 2012 SJR was 0.464, with a ranking of 348/1,588 (21.9%) in the category of medicine (miscellaneous). The Hirsch index from KoreaMed Synapse, Web of Science, and SCImago Journal & Country Rank were 12, 15, and 19, respectively. In comparison with data from 2010, the values of all the journal metrics increased consistently. These results reflect favorably on the increased competency of editors and authors of The Korean journal of Internal Medicine. Addresses: E-mail Addresses: shuh at hallym.ac.kr Cited Reference Count: 11 Times Cited: 1 Publisher: KOREAN ASSOC INTERNAL MEDICINE, 101-2501 LOTTE CASTLE PRESIDENT, 109 MAPO-DAERO, MAPO-GU, SEOUL, 121-916, SOUTH KOREA ISSN: 1226-3303 Web of Science Categories: Medicine, General & Internal Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine IDS Number: AA9KS Unique ID: WOS:000331413000001 Cited References: Huh Sun, 2011, Neurointervention, V6, P49 Huh Sun, 2013, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, V10, P3 Kim Kun Sang, 2012, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, V9, P1 [Anonymous], 2013, Web of Science, KoreaMed Synapse, 2013, Synapse journals, Huh S., 2011, Korean J Nephrol, V30, P134 Korean Medical Citation Index, 2011, Korean Medical Citation. Index project, Huh Sun, 2013, Korean journal of urology, V54, P220 [Anonymous], 2013, JCR Web, [Anonymous], 2007, SCImago Journal & Country rank, Huh Sun, 2011, Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, V26, P1 *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338519300005 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The Matthew effect in empirical data Authors: Perc, M Author Full Names: Perc, Matjaz Source: JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 11 (98):10.1098/rsif.2014.0378 SEP 6 2014 Language: English Document Type: Review Author Keywords: Matthew effect, preferential attachment, cumulative advantage, self-organization, power law, empirical data KeyWords Plus: MEASURING PREFERENTIAL ATTACHMENT; SMALL-WORLD NETWORKS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; SCIENTIFIC IMPACT; POWER LAWS; COLLABORATION NETWORK; GROWING NETWORKS; ZIPFS LAW; 1ST-MOVER ADVANTAGE; CITATION NETWORKS Abstract: The Matthew effect describes the phenomenon that in societies, the rich tend to get richer and the potent even more powerful. It is closely related to the concept of preferential attachment in network science, where the more connected nodes are destined to acquire many more links in the future than the auxiliary nodes. Cumulative advantage and success-breads-success also both describe the fact that advantage tends to beget further advantage. The concept is behind the many power laws and scaling behaviour in empirical data, and it is at the heart of self-organization across social and natural sciences. Here, we review the methodology for measuring preferential attachment in empirical data, as well as the observations of the Matthew effect in patterns of scientific collaboration, socio-technical and biological networks, the propagation of citations, the emergence of scientific progress and impact, career longevity, the evolution of common English words and phrases, as well as in education and brain development. We also discuss whether the Matthew effect is due to chance or optimization, for example related to homophily in social systems or efficacy in technological systems, and we outline possible directions for future research. Addresses: Univ Maribor, Fac Nat Sci & Math, SLO-2000 Maribor, Slovenia. E-mail Addresses: matjaz.perc at uni-mb.si Funding Acknowledgement: Slovenian Research Agency [P5-0027] Funding Text: This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (Grant P5-0027). Cited Reference Count: 164 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ROYAL SOC, 6-9 CARLTON HOUSE TERRACE, LONDON SW1Y 5AG, ENGLAND ISSN: 1742-5689 eISSN: 1742-5662 Article Number: Web of Science Categories: Multidisciplinary Sciences Research Areas: Science & Technology - Other Topics IDS Number: AK6DW Unique ID: WOS:000338519300005 Cited References: Dorogovtsev SN, 2002, ADVANCES IN PHYSICS, V51, P1079 Gabaix X, 1999, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V114, P739 Baronchelli Andrea, 2012, ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, V15, Caldarelli G, 2002, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V89, Yule GU, 1925, PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-CONTAINING PAPERS OF A BIOLOGICAL CHARACTER, V213, P21 Redner S, 2005, PHYSICS TODAY, V58, P49 Capocci A., 2006, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V74, Pfeiffer T, 2005, PLOS BIOLOGY, V3, P1269 Clauset Aaron, 2009, SIAM REVIEW, V51, P661 Pennock DM, 2002, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V99, P5207 Loreto Vittorio, 2007, NATURE PHYSICS, V3, P758 SHAYWITZ BA, 1995, READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, V30, P894 MILLER GA, 1957, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, V70, P311 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Dorogovtsev SN, 2003, Evolution of networks: from biological nets to the internet and WWW, Baronchelli A, 2006, J. Stat. Mech., V6, Beel Joeran, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2009 - 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOL 112th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics, JUL 14-17, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, V1, P230 Barabasi Albert-Laszlo, 2012, NATURE, V489, P507 Eom Y. -H., 2008, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V77, Watts DJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P440 Sornette D, 2006, Critical phenomena in natural sciences, Bernhardsson Sebastian, 2009, NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, V11, Barabasi AL, 2002, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V311, P590 Pan Raj Kumar, 2012, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, V2, Mitzenmacher M, 2004, Internet Math, V1, P226 Penner Orion, 2013, PHYSICS TODAY, V66, P8 Guimera R, 2005, SCIENCE, V308, P697 Adar E., 2005, Proceedings. The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web IntelligenceProceedings. The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, 19-22 Sept. 2005, Compiegne, France, Stringer Michael J., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V61, P1377 Simmons MP, 2011, Proc. ICWSM, 17-21 July, Barcelona, Spain, P353 Newman M. E. J., 2009, EPL, V86, Bettencourt LMA, 2006, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V364, P513 Gibrat R, 1931, Les inegalitese conomiques, Vespignani Alessandro, 2012, NATURE PHYSICS, V8, P32 Barabasi A-L, 2002, Linked: the new science of networks, Jin EM, 2001, Phys. Rev. E, V64, Kunegis J, 2013, Proc. ACM WSC, 2-4 May, Paris, France, P205 Massen Claire P., 2007, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V377, P351 Ferrer i Cancho R, 2001, J. Quant. Linguistics, V8, P165 Petersen Alexander M., 2010, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V81, Reed WJ, 2001, ECONOMICS LETTERS, V74, P15 Uzzi Brian, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P468 Newman MEJ, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAColloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, MAY 09-11, 2003, Irvine, CA, V101, P5200 Maillart T., 2008, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V101, Leskovec J, 2009, Proc. ACM SIGKDD, 28 June-1 July, Paris, France, P497 Pacheco JM, 2014, Phys. Life. Rev., Radicchi Filippo, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P17268 Angeles Serrano M., 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, Christakis NA, 2009, Connected: the surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives, Pastor-Satorras R, 2004, Evolution and structure of the internet: a statistical physics approach, Pfeiffer Thomas, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P12052 Radicchi Filippo, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Petersen Alexander M., 2011, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V108, P18 Krapivsky PL, 2000, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V85, P4629 Newman MEJ, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V98, P404 Vazquez A, 2003, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V67, Zipf GK, 1949, Human behavior and the principle of least-effort, Stanovich KE, 2008, J. Educ., V189, P23 Wang Mingyang, 2009, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V388, P4273 Amaral LAN, 2000, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V97, P11149 BAK P, 1987, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V59, P381 Milojevic Stasa, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V111, P3984 Evans James A., 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P721 Jeong H, 2003, EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, V61, P567 Weng L, 2013, Proc. ACM SIGKDD, 11-14 August, Chicago, IL, P356 Carlson JM, 1999, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V60, P1412 Baek Seung Ki, 2011, NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, V13, Reed WJ, 2002, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V66, Baronchelli Andrea, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, Borner K, 2014, Atlas of knowledge, Perc Matjaz, 2010, JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, V4, P475 Newman MEJ, 2003, SIAM REVIEW, V45, P167 Borner K, 2010, Atlas of science, Kornai Andras, 2008, MATHEMATICAL LINGUISTICS, P1 Dawkins R, 1989, The selfish gene, 2006, The Structure and Dynamics of Networks, Pareto V, 1895, Giornale degli Economisti, V10, P59 Sole R, 2005, NATURE, V434, P289 de Blasio Birgitte Freiesleben, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P10762 Papadopoulos Fragkiskos, 2012, NATURE, V489, P537 Redner S, 1998, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V4, P131 Moody J, 2004, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, V69, P213 Raizada Rajeev D. S., 2010, FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, V4, Tsonis AA, 1997, Complexity, V3, P12 Newman MEJ, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Cancho RFI, 2005, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, V44, P249 Champernowne D. G., 1953, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, V63, P318 Sneppen K, 1997, PHYSICA D, V110, P209 Morgan Paul L., 2008, LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, V31, P187 Pareto V, 1997, Rivista di Politica Economica, V87, P691 Fortunato Santo, 2010, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V486, P75 Mocanu Delia, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Merton RK, 1968, Science, V159, P53 Trist E, 1981, Occas. Paper, V2, P1 Tomassini Marco, 2007, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V385, P750 SIMON HA, 1955, BIOMETRIKA, V42, P425 Scarborough HS, 2003, ANNALS OF DYSLEXIA, V53, P47 Reed WJ, 2003, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V319, P469 D'Souza Raissa M., 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V104, P6112 Puglisi Andrea, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P7936 Barrat A, 2008, Dynamical processes in complex networks, Rigney D, 2013, The Matthew effect: how advantage begets further advantage, Zhang Qian, 2013, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, V3, Nazir A, 2008, Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 20-22 October, Vouliagmeni, Greece, P43 Krapivsky PL, 2005, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V71, Borge-Holthoefer J, 2013, J. Complex Netw., V1, P3 Sornette D, 1998, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V57, P4811 Pastor-Satorras R, 2003, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, V222, P199 Golosovsky Michael, 2013, JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, V151, P340 Acuna Daniel E., 2012, NATURE, V489, P201 SEGLEN PO, 1992, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V43, P628 Cohen Geoffrey L., 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P1307 Leskovec J, 2012, Mining of massive datasets, Wang Mingyang, 2008, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V387, P4692 Watts DJ, 1999, Small worlds, Rozenfeld Hernan D., 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V105, P18702 Sole Ricard V., 2010, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, V7, P1647 von Mering C, 2002, NATURE, V417, P399 PRICE DJD, 1965, SCIENCE, V149, P510 Cancho RFI, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V100, P788 Valverde Sergi, 2007, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V76, Schumpeter JA, 1934, The theory of economic development, Perc Matjaz, 2013, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, V10, Light S, 2005, BMC GENOMICS, V6, Gleeson James P., 2014, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V112, Radicchi Filippo, 2012, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, V2, Chavalarias David, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, Perc Matjaz, 2012, JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, V9, P3323 Barabasi Albert-Laszlo, 2012, NATURE PHYSICS, V8, P14 Willis JC, 1922, NATURE, V109, P177 Golosovsky Michael, 2012, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V109, Lehmann S, 2003, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V68, Boccaletti S., 2006, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V424, P175 Kumar R, 2006, Proc. ACM SIGKDD, 20-23 August, Philadelphia, PA, P611 Dall'Asta Luca, 2006, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V74, Dorogovtsev S. N., 2008, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, V80, P1275 Arenas Alex, 2008, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V469, P93 Eisenberg E, 2003, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V91, Wasserman S, 1994, Social network analysis, Dorogovtsev SN, 2000, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, V85, P4633 Wang Dashun, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P127 Herdagdelen A., 2007, EPL, V78, Stanley HE, 1971, Introduction to phase transitions and critical phenomena, Holme Petter, 2012, PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V519, P97 Newman MEJ, 2001, Phys. Rev. E, V64, Newman MEJ, 2005, CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS, V46, P323 Eom Young-Ho, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Gomez Rodriguez M, 2010, Proc. ACM SIGKDD, P1019 KERIN RA, 1992, JOURNAL OF MARKETING, V56, P33 Michel Jean-Baptiste, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P176 Cohen Geoffrey L., 2009, SCIENCE, V324, P400 Mazloumian Amin, 2013, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, V3, Weng L., 2012, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, V2, P1 Newman MEJ, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Barabasi AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509 Jones JH, 2003, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V270, P1123 Albert R, 2002, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, V74, P47 Perc Matjaz, 2013, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, V3, Radicchi Filippo, 2009, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V80, Conover M, 2011, Proc. ICWSM, 17-21 July, Barcelona, Spain, P89 Penner Orion, 2013, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, V3, Sheridan Paul, 2012, PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, V391, P5031 Poncela Julia, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, Brakman S, 1999, JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, V39, P183 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338125300004 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Cities as spatial clusters Authors: Rauch, F Author Full Names: Rauch, Ferdinand Source: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 14 (4):759-773; 10.1093/jeg/lbt034 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Zipf's law for cities, distribution of city size KeyWords Plus: ZIPFS LAW; POPULATION; GRAVITY; GROWTH; TRADE Abstract: This article shows that *Zipf*'s Law for cities can emerge as a property of a clustering process. If initially uniformly distributed people chose their location based on a specific gravity equation as found in trade studies, they will form cities that follow *Zipf*'s Law in expected value. This view of cities as spatial agglomerations is supported empirically by the observation that larger cities are surrounded by larger hinterland areas and larger countryside populations. Addresses: [Rauch, Ferdinand] Univ Oxford, Dept Econ, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England. [Rauch, Ferdinand] CEP, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England. E-mail Addresses: Ferdinand.Rauch at economics.ox.ac.uk Cited Reference Count: 33 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND ISSN: 1468-2702 eISSN: 1468-2710 Web of Science Categories: Economics; Geography Research Areas: Business & Economics; Geography IDS Number: AK0SL Unique ID: WOS:000338125300004 Cited References: Soo KT, 2005, REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, V35, P239 de Vries J., 1984, European Urbanization, 1500-1800, Hsu Wen-Tai, 2012, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, V122, P903 MORGAN P, 1985, ECONOMETRICA, V53, P923 Behrens K., 2012, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7922, United Nations, 2013, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision, Axtell RL, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P1818 Eeckhout J, 2004, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V94, P1429 Eaton J, 1997, REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICSConference on Recent Advances in Urban Economic Theory - A Tribute to David Pines, MAY 29-30, 1994, TEL AVIV, ISRAEL, V27, P443 SIMON HA, 1955, BIOMETRIKA, V42, P425 Rossi-Hansberg Esteban, 2007, REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, V74, P597 Michaels Guy, 2012, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V127, P535 Holmes T., 2010, Agglomeration Economics, Ioannides Y., 2009, Working Paper, Disdier Anne-Celia, 2008, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, V90, P37 Chaney T., 2011, Working Paper, Nitsch V, 2005, JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, V57, P86 Anderson JE, 2003, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V93, P170 Anderson J. E., 2010, NBER Working Paper, US Census, 2013, County-to-County Migration Flows, 2005-2009 5 year ACS, Zipf GK, 1949, Human behavior and the principle of least-effort, Giesen K., 2012, CESifo Working Paper No 3730, Black D, 2003, JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, V3, P343 Gibrat R, 1931, Les inegalitese conomiques, Auerbach Felix, 1913, PETERMANNS MITTEILUNGEN, V59, P74 Gabaix X, 1999, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V114, P739 Gabaix X., 2004, V4, P2341 Nitsch V, 2003, REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, V33, P401 Rozenfeld Hernan D., 2011, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V101, P2205 Rosen K., 2005, Journal of Urban Economics, V8, P165 Krugman P., 1996, The Self-Organizing Economy, Giesen K., 2010, Journal of Economic Geography, V11, P667 Chaney Thomas, 2008, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, V98, P1707 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338349000044 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Web 2.0 and social networks: a study of scientific publications in Spanish communication *journals* Authors: Soler, IR; Romero, CD; Martinez, AC Author Full Names: Ramos Soler, Irene; del Pino Romero, Cristina; Castello Martinez, Araceli Source: HISTORIA Y COMUNICACION SOCIAL, 19 577-590; 10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.44986 2014 Language: Spanish Document Type: Article Author Keywords: journals, social networks, web 2.0, communication, internet KeyWords Plus: SPAIN Abstract: Communication and advertising currently live immersed in a process of change and constant evolution, powered by social, cultural and technological revolution that web 2.0 has brought. This work aims to determine the main lines of academic work in the field of social networks and web 2.0 in Spain, studying the projection and the use given to each of the scientific research methodologies. To carry out the analysis it has been done a selection of publications on this topic in major communication journals of Spain. Addresses: [Ramos Soler, Irene; Castello Martinez, Araceli] Univ Alicante, Seminario Permanente Invest Observ Mayores & Medi, Alicante, Spain. [del Pino Romero, Cristina] Univ Carlos III Madrid, E-28903 Getafe, Spain. E-mail Addresses: irene.ramos at ua.es; araceli.castello at ua.es Cited Reference Count: 13 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: UNIV COMPLUTENSE MADRID, SERVICIO PUBLICACIONES, CIUDAD UNIV, OBISPO TREJO 3, MADRID, 28040, SPAIN ISSN: 1137-0734 eISSN: 1988-3056 Web of Science Categories: Film, Radio, Television; History Research Areas: Film, Radio & Television; History IDS Number: AK3UA Unique ID: WOS:000338349000044 Cited References: Berlanga I., 2013, COMUNICAR, P127 BENAVIDES DELGADO J., 2012, Questiones publicitarias, VI, P71 Javier Perez-Latre Francisco, 2011, COMUNICACION Y SOCIEDAD, V24, P63 DEL PINO C., 2013, La comunicacion en cambio constante. Branded Content, Community Management, Comunicacion 2.0 y Estrategia en medios sociales, MARTINEZ-PASTOR E., 2012, El profesional de la Informacion, V22, P173 CASTILLO-ESPARCIA A., 2012, Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, P248 IAB SPAIN, 2012, I Estudio de inversion en Comunicacion Digital, Escriba Eudald, 2013, COMUNICAR, P35 MARTINEZ M., 2011, Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, V66, P101 AIMC, 2013, Resumen de resultados del Estudio General de Medios de la Asociacion para la Investigacion de Medios de Comunicacion, Fernandez-Quijada David, 2013, COMUNICAR, P15 ROCA-CORREA D., 2012, Zer. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, P292 Castillo Antonio, 2010, COMUNICACION Y SOCIEDAD, V23, P289 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338123400049 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Analysis of the Relationship between Patent Litigation and *Citation*: Subdivision of *Citations* Authors: Lim, J Author Full Names: Lim, Jiyoun Source: APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 8 (5):2515-2522; SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Patent litigation, patent citation, indirect citation, latent citation Abstract: Recent examples of patent litigation show the evidence of firms strategic patent use. Thus forecasting patent litigation becomes a greater priority. Patent citations have been prevalent in its usage in analyzing business environment as diverse patent indicators or a tool to predict patent litigation. However, most previous research has considered only direct patent citations. In order to overcome the limitation, this study analyzes patent litigation quantitatively through three kinds of patent citations: direct, indirect and latent citation, and empirically analyzed the relationship between these citations and patent litigation between plaintiff and defendant firms based on U. S. patent documents and patent litigation information. Consequently, this study found that the indirect citation is more by 7% than direct citations to patent litigation. In addition, latent citation is 8% higher in frequency compared with the number of litigations in in/direct citation relationship. Therefore, these results indicate that various approach for patent citation can provide more information for forecasting patent litigation. Addresses: ETRI, SW Contents Future Res Team, Taejon 305700, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: kusses at etri.re.kr Cited Reference Count: 30 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: NATURAL SCIENCES PUBLISHING CORP-NSP, 19 W 34 ST, SUITE 1018, NEW YORK, NY 10001 USA ISSN: 2325-0399 Web of Science Categories: Mathematics, Applied; Physics, Mathematical Research Areas: Mathematics; Physics IDS Number: AK0RV Unique ID: WOS:000338123400049 Cited References: Lai Yi-Hsuan, 2009, JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V26, P167 Wartburg I.V., 2005, Research Policy, V34, P1591 Atallah Gamal, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P437 Fort G., 2006, Patent Strategy & Management, V7, US. Department of Commerce, 1998, The New Innovations Global Patenting Trends in Five Sectors, Ernst H, 1998, JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V15, P279 Pegels CC, 1996, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V43, P246 [Anonymous], 2010, The Economist, Lanjouw JO, 2001, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSConference on Patent Systems and Innovation, JAN, 1999, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, V32, P129 The Economist, 2011, The Econo-mist, [Anonymous], 2010, The Economist, Cockburn M., 2006, NBER Working Paper, V12563, Karki M.M.S., 1997, World patent Information, V19, P269 TRAJTENBERG M, 1990, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V21, P172 Duguet E., 2005, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, V14, P375 Kim A.G., 2002, IEEE Systems and Information Design Symposium, USA, Somaya D, 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V24, P17 Thomas Robert E., 2006, AMERICAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL, V43, P689 Lanjouw J.O., 1997, NBER Working paper, 6297, Cremers K., 2004, Discussion Paper, No. 04-72, Liu SJ, 1997, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V13, P661 McDonough III J.F., 2006, Emory Law Journal, V56, P189 Wang Shyh-Jen, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V71, P509 Blind K, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY2nd ZEW Conference on the Economics of Innovation and Patents, SEP 19-20, 2005, Mannheim, GERMANY, V35, P655 Rantanen J., 2006, Santa Clara Computer and High - Technology Law Journal, V23, USPTO, 2011, [No title captured], Hirschey M., 2001, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, V9, P65 Marco A. C., 2005, Review of Financial Economics, V14, P323 Bessen J., 2005, Lewis & Clark Law Review, V9, P1 Harhoff D, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY, V32, P1343 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338116000001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: The 2013 Most Influential Bioelectromagnetics Journal Paper by *Citation* Award Authors: Lin, JC Author Full Names: Lin, James C. Source: BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 35 (5):313-313; 10.1002/bem.21860 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Editorial Material Cited Reference Count: 2 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA ISSN: 0197-8462 eISSN: 1521-186X Web of Science Categories: Biology; Biophysics Research Areas: Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics; Biophysics IDS Number: AK0PH Unique ID: WOS:000338116000001 Cited References: VASHISTH, 2008, BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, V29, P571 Vashisth Ananta, 2008, BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, V29, P571 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338467000046 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Levels of evidence of clinical spinal research published in the highest impact medical journals Authors: Jamjoom, BA; Jamjoom, AA; Jamjoom, AB Author Full Names: Jamjoom, Bakur A.; Jamjoom, Aimun A.; Jamjoom, Abdulhakim B. Source: SPINE JOURNAL, 14 (7):1368-1369; 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.034 JUL 2014 Language: English Document Type: Letter Addresses: [Jamjoom, Bakur A.] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, W Midlands, England. [Jamjoom, Aimun A.] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Clin Neurosci, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland. [Jamjoom, Abdulhakim B.] King Khalid Natl Guards Hosp, Sect Neurosurg, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia. Cited Reference Count: 2 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA ISSN: 1529-9430 eISSN: 1878-1632 Web of Science Categories: Clinical Neurology; Orthopedics Research Areas: Neurosciences & Neurology; Orthopedics IDS Number: AK5LV Unique ID: WOS:000338467000046 Cited References: Amiri Amir Reza, 2013, SPINE JOURNAL, V13, P1148 [Anonymous], 2013, Medical Journal Impact Factors, ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338358300001 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: *Scientometric* trends and knowledge maps of global health systems research Authors: Yao, Q; Chen, K; Yao, L; Lyu, PH; Yang, TA; Luo, F; Chen, SQ; He, LY; Liu, ZY Author Full Names: Yao, Qiang; Chen, Kai; Yao, Lan; Lyu, Peng-hui; Yang, Tian-an; Luo, Fei; Chen, Shan-quan; He, Lu-yang; Liu, Zhi-yong Source: HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 12 10.1186/1478-4505-12-26 JUN 5 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Global trend, Health systems research, Knowledge mapping, Scientometric, Web of Science KeyWords Plus: ASHP NATIONAL-SURVEY; CARE-DELIVERY SYSTEM; PHARMACY PRACTICE; MENTAL-HEALTH; INFORMATION NEEDS; FUTURE CHALLENGES; CLUSTER-ANALYSIS; FAMILY MEDICINE; CO-AUTHOR; POLICY Abstract: Background: In the last few decades, health systems research (HSR) has garnered much attention with a rapid increase in the related literature. This study aims to review and evaluate the global progress in HSR and assess the current quantitative trends. Methods: Based on data from the Web of Science database, scientometric methods and knowledge visualization techniques were applied to evaluate global scientific production and develop trends of HSR from 1900 to 2012. Results: HSR has increased rapidly over the past 20 years. Currently, there are 28,787 research articles published in 3,674 journals that are listed in 140 Web of Science subject categories. The research in this field has mainly focused on public, environmental and occupational health (6,178, 21.46%), health care sciences and services (5,840, 20.29%), and general and internal medicine (3,783, 13.14%). The top 10 journals had published 2,969 (10.31%) articles and received 5,229 local citations and 40,271 global citations. The top 20 authors together contributed 628 papers, which accounted for a 2.18% share in the cumulative worldwide publications. The most productive author was McKee, from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, with 48 articles. In addition, USA and American institutions ranked the first in health system research productivity, with high citation times, followed by the UK and Canada. Conclusions: HSR is an interdisciplinary area. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries showed they are the leading nations in HSR. Meanwhile, American and Canadian institutions and the World Health Organization play a dominant role in the production, collaboration, and citation of high quality articles. Moreover, health policy and analysis research, health systems and sub-systems research, healthcare and services research, health, epidemiology and economics of communicable and non-communicable diseases, primary care research, health economics and health costs, and pharmacy of hospital have been identified as the mainstream topics in HSR fields. These findings will provide evidence of the current status and trends in HSR all over the world, as well as clues to the impact of this popular topic; thus, helping scientific researchers and policy makers understand the panorama of HSR and predict the dynamic directions of research. Addresses: [Yao, Qiang; Chen, Kai; Yao, Lan; Luo, Fei; Chen, Shan-quan; He, Lu-yang; Liu, Zhi-yong] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Med & Hlth Management, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China. [Lyu, Peng-hui] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Studies Informat Resources, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China. [Yang, Tian-an] Univ Munich, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-180539 Munich, Germany. E-mail Addresses: zhiyongliu at hust.edu.cn Cited Reference Count: 123 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND ISSN: 1478-4505 Article Number: 26 Web of Science Categories: Health Policy & Services Research Areas: Health Care Sciences & Services IDS Number: AK3XK Unique ID: WOS:000338358300001 Cited References: Ritz Lindsay Sarah, 2010, Southern med review, V3, P2 Wagstaff Adam, 2012, JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, V31, P406 Simo Juan, 2012, GACETA SANITARIA, V26, P36 Belaid Loubna, 2012, BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, V12, Tinga N, 1999, TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, V4, P814 Powell Byron J., 2012, MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, V69, P123 Hunter Jennifer C., 2012, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, Craig Nancy, 2011, CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, V57, P986 Bennett Sara, 2011, PLOS MEDICINE, V8, Li Ling-li, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P39 Clarke Greg, 2006, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, V13, P287 AHPSR, 2004, Strengthening Health Systems: the Role and Promise of Policy and Systems Research, Manasse Henri R., Jr., 2012, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, V69, P972 Ali Gamal Khalafalla Mohamed, 2009, AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, V3, P70 Arunachalam S, 2000, CURRENT SCIENCE, V79, P621 Steinberg AG, 2006, JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, V21, P260 Wang Li, 2010, NEW CARBON MATERIALS, V25, P401 Pedersen Craig A., 2012, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, V69, P768 Pedreschi Chaves Lucieli Dias, 2012, REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, V46, P1274 Santos Melissa Costa, 2012, CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, V17, P3011 Liu Yuanli, 2008, LANCET, V372, P1914 Macinko J, 2003, HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, V38, P831 Balabanova D., 2012, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, P25 Wald Heidi, 2012, IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, V7, Irwin Alec, 2006, PLOS MEDICINE, V3, P749 Liu Jin, 2011, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V10, P210 Subramanian Usha, 2007, MEDICAL CARE, V45, P28 Knapp Jeffrey, 2005, REPRESENTATIONS, P1 van de Ven Wynand P. M. M., 2013, HEALTH POLICY, V109, P226 Eisen MB, 1998, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V95, P14863 Gilson Lucy, 2011, PLOS MEDICINE, V8, Sollazzo Ana, 2011, CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, V16, P2829 Norfolk Evan, 2013, CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, V8, P687 Frenk Julio, 2010, PLOS MEDICINE, V7, Suk Fat-Moon, 2011, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, V23, P295 Adam Taghreed, 2012, HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, V27, P1 Volandes Angelo E., 2007, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, V7, P5 Gould Debra A., 2013, FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, V31, P108 Ingram Richard C., 2012, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, V42, P214 Siskou Olga, 2008, HEALTH POLICY, V88, P282 Miguel Campanario Juan, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V87, P75 Morello Renata Teresa, 2013, BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, V22, P11 Kowal P., 2011, Health, V3, P638 Stewart Moira, 2010, ACADEMIC MEDICINE, V85, P974 Lucan Sean C., 2009, FAMILY MEDICINEWinter Meeting of the Association-of-Departments-of-Family-Medicine, 2008, San Diego, CA, V41, P188 Ketchen DJ, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V17, P441 Adam Taghreed, 2012, HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, V27, P9 Bennett Sara, 2008, LANCET, V372, P1571 Daniels Charles E., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, V70, P431 Ranson Michael K, 2009, Health research policy and systems / BioMed Central, V7, P27 Yip Winnie, 2008, HEALTH AFFAIRS, V27, P921 King Marjorie L., 2013, JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, V33, P144 Pouris Anthipi, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P541 Maass Juan, 2010, INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, V22, P394 Savigny De DAT, 2009, Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening, Pressman Alice R., 2011, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, V14, P407 Moghadam Mahmoud Nekoei, 2012, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, V27, Pe121 Monroe C. Douglas, 2013, JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, V19, P334 Ghaffar Abdul, 2013, LANCET, V381, P436 Zoellner Ianni Aurea Maria, 2012, CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V28, P925 Wang CD, 1998, SCIENTOMETRICS, V42, P89 Riehle Martha A., 2012, JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, V20, P299 Dilley Julia A., 2012, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, V42, PS58 LeMay Nancy Vollmer, 2012, JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, V17, P64 Sheikh Kabir, 2011, PLOS MEDICINE, V8, Thulasi K, 2010, Ann Lib Inf Stu, V57, P310 Ghaffar Abdul, 2012, BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, V90, P797 Ambresin Anne-Emmanuelle, 2013, JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V52, PS9 Barros Aluisio J. D., 2008, BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, V8, Gonzalez-Block MA, 2004, Health Res Policy Syst, V2, P6 Mills Anne, 2012, HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, V27, P1 Silva Hudson P., 2012, REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V46, P83 AHPSR, 2007, Sound Choices: Enhancing Capacity for Evidence- Informed Health Policy, AHPSR, 2011, A Methodology Reader, D'Urzo Anthony, 2013, PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, V22, P1 van Olmen Josefien, 2012, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, Schneider H, 2011, Masters in Public Health course powerpoint slides, Mold James W., 2012, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, V25, PE1 Grabois Gadelha Carlos Augusto, 2012, REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, V46, P13 Shapiro J, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V315, P953 Leydesdorff L, 1997, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V48, P418 Sundewall Jesper, 2011, LANCET, V377, P1222 Pedersen Craig A., 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, V70, P787 Comino Elizabeth Jean, 2012, BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, V12, Dang Yan, 2011, DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, V50, P415 Ikeda Nayu, 2011, JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, V21, P385 Wagstaff Adam, 2009, HEALTH ECONOMICS, V18, PS7 Van Beurden Eric K., 2013, HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, V28, P73 Peters D. H., 2011, INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, V133, P9 Monson Samantha Pelican, 2012, FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, V30, P181 Swanson R. Chad, 2012, HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, V27, P54 Boyack KW, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V64, P351 Adam Taghreed, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, Hadizadeh Fatemeh, 2012, JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, V17, PS253 Mann G. H., 2011, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, V15, P715 Enachescu C, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V56, P43 Gruskin Sofia, 2012, GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, V7, P337 D'Adamo Margaret, 2012, JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, V17, P23 Kapadia-Kundu Nandita, 2012, JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, V17, P30 World Health Organization, 2000, The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance, Travis P, 2004, LANCET, V364, P900 Pedersen Craig A., 2010, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, V67, P542 Zhang Shu-liang, 2010, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHINESE FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND APPLICATIONS (2010), VOLS 1-37th National Conference on Functional Materials and Applications, OCT, 2010, Hunan, PEOPLES R CHINA, P984 van Eck Nees Jan, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523 Warner Pamela, 2012, JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, V38, P179 Thakur Ramendra, 2012, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, V65, P562 Nishita Christy, 2013, JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, V24, P404 Garcia Leila Posenato, 2013, CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, V18, P115 Faba-Perez C, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V58, P623 Callahan CM, 2001, MEDICAL CAREGeneral Internal Medicine-Geriatric Education Retreat, AUG, 1999, JASPER, CANADA, V39, P772 Lucio- Arias D, 2007, Proceedings of ISSI 2007. 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 25-27 June, 2007, Atun Rifat, 2012, HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, V27, P4 Al-Qadheeb Nada S., 2012, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, V76, World Health Organization, 2007, Everybody's Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes, Jones Andrew M., 2011, JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, V30, P616 Han Youli, 2012, ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, V24, P833 Samb Badara, 2009, LANCET, V373, P2137 Mutschke P, 2003, ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS V5th International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, AUG 28-30, 2003, BERLIN, GERMANY, V2810, P155 Hendryx Michael, 2008, JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, V11, P17 GARFIELD E, 1990, CURRENT CONTENTS, V32, P5 Anderberg MR, 1973, Cluster analysis for applications, Alsultan Mohammed S., 2012, SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, V20, P307 Font Joan Costa, 2012, FUTURES, V44, P696 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338216100007 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Characteristics and trends of research on positron emission tomography: a *bibliometric* analysis, 2002-2012 Authors: Baek, S; Yoon, DY; Min, KJ; Lim, KJ; Seo, YL; Yun, EJ Author Full Names: Baek, Sora; Yoon, Dae Young; Min, Kyung Joon; Lim, Kyoung Ja; Seo, Young Lan; Yun, Eun Joo Source: ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 28 (5):455-462; 10.1007/s12149-014-0836-7 JUN 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: PET, Research, Publications, Bibliometrics KeyWords Plus: JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; RADIOLOGY RESEARCH; RESEARCH ARTICLES; NUCLEAR-MEDICINE; PUBLICATION; ONCOLOGY; AUTHORSHIP; PUBLISH Abstract: We performed a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications focused on positron emission tomography (PET) over a 10-year period. The MEDLINE and ISI Web of Knowledge databases were searched for English language original articles focused on PET in SCI/SCIE-indexed journals in 2002, 2007, and 2012. We selected the documents with titles that included "PET" or "positron emission." The following information was obtained from each article: journal (year of publication, title, subject category, and impact factor), subspecialty, imaging modality used, tracer, species, sample size, number of authors, affiliation of the first author, declared funding, and country of origin. The yearly publication on PET increased from 547 (2002) to 986 (2007), and 1838 (2012). A total of 1753 (52.0 %) articles were published in journals in the "Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging" category, 1512 (44.9 %) were in the subspecialty of oncology, 3245 (96.3 %) used PET or PET/CT, 1698 (50.4 %) used 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) as the radiotracer, 2378 (70.5 %) were human studies, 1294 (38.4 %) had a sample size of < 20, 1674 (49.7 %) had > 7 authors, 779 (23.1 %) were written by a first author from a department of nuclear medicine, and 1337 (39.7 %) were supported by government funding. The United States published 948 studies (28.1 %) followed by Japan (345, 10.2 %) and Germany (335, 9.9 %). In the time trend analysis oncology subspecialty, PET/MR as the imaging modality, FDG as the tracer, sample size > 50, number of authors > 7, radiology department affiliation of the first author, and government funding exhibited significantly positive trends. The number of publication concerning PET has increased rapidly over the last decade. This bibliometric analysis revealed characteristics and trends of current PET research that provides useful information to researchers. Addresses: [Baek, Sora] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Kangdong Seong Sim Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul 134701, South Korea. [Yoon, Dae Young; Min, Kyung Joon; Lim, Kyoung Ja; Seo, Young Lan; Yun, Eun Joo] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Kangdong Seong Sim Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul 134701, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: evee0914 at chollian.net Cited Reference Count: 28 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA ISSN: 0914-7187 eISSN: 1864-6433 Web of Science Categories: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Research Areas: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging IDS Number: AK1YU Unique ID: WOS:000338216100007 Cited References: Ingram T G, 1992, Family medicine, V24, P303 Andersen Julia, 2006, Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection, V39, P436 Rahman M, 2002, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, V347, P1211 Hwang SS, 2003, RADIOLOGY, V226, P16 Greenbelt M, 2011, PET imaging market summary report IMV, Lim Kyoung Ja, 2012, RADIOLOGY, V264, P796 LUUKKONEN T, 1990, ANNALS OF MEDICINE, V22, P145 Fang Ferric C., 2009, INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, V77, P929 Falagas Matthew E., 2006, MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, V81, P1401 Garg A. X., 2006, KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, V70, P1995 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Hricak Hedvig, 2010, RADIOLOGY, V257, P498 Itagaki MW, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V237, P774 Rahman M, 2002, ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, V16, P383 Signore A, 2004, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, V31, P882 Donovan Arthur J., 2010, SURGERY, V147, P5 Rahman M, 2003, PUBLIC HEALTH, V117, P274 Seglen PO, 1997, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V314, P498 Miguel-Dasit Alberto, 2008, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, V67, P384 Fletcher James W., 2008, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, V49, P480 Vinardell M. Pajares, 2007, REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR, V26, P345 Beyer T, 2000, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, V41, P1369 RIESENBERG D, 1990, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V264, P1857 Falagas Matthew E., 2008, FASEB JOURNAL, V22, P2623 Chen Ran-Chou, 2009, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, V37, P319 Friedenberg RM, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V220, P296 Histed Stephanie N., 2012, NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, V33, P349 Yun Eun Joo, 2013, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, V200, PW560 ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338423800022 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: Measures of health sciences journal use: a comparison of vendor, link-resolver, and local *citation* statistics. (vol 101, pg 110, 2013) Authors: De Groote, SL; Blecic, DD; Martin, K Author Full Names: De Groote, S. L.; Blecic, D. D.; Martin, K. Source: JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 102 (2):10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.025 APR 2014 Language: English Document Type: Correction Cited Reference Count: 1 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOC, 65 EAST WACKER PLACE, STE 1900, CHICAGO, IL 60601-7298 USA ISSN: 1536-5050 Web of Science Categories: Information Science & Library Science Research Areas: Information Science & Library Science IDS Number: AK4WB Unique ID: WOS:000338423800022 Cited References: De Groote Sandra L., 2013, JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, V101, P110 ======================================================================== ======================================================================== *View Full Record: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS&DestLinkType=FullRecord;UT=WOS:000338131900036 *Order Full Text [ ] Title: A *Scientometrics* and Social Network Analysis of Malaysian Research in Physics Authors: Tan, HX; Ujum, EA; Ratnavelu, K Author Full Names: Tan, H. X.; Ujum, E. A.; Ratnavelu, K. Edited by: Ratnavelu K; Chia SP; Wong CS; Ooi RCH Source: FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 1588 241-245; 10.1063/1.4866953 2014 Book Series: AIP Conference Proceedings Language: English Document Type: Proceedings Paper Conference Title: 4th International Meeting on Frontiers of Physics (IMFP) Conference Date: AUG 27-30, 2013 Conference Location: Kuala Lumpu, MALAYSIA Conference Sponsors: Univ Malaya, Acad Sci Malaysia, Abdul Salam Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Asia Pacific Ctr Theoret Phys, Malaysian Profess Sci Assoc Grp, Malaysian Inst Phys Author Keywords: Publication output, bibliometrics, SNA, physics, Malaysian research Abstract: This conference proceeding presents an empirical assessment on the domestic publication output and structure of scientific collaboration of Malaysian authors for the field of physics. Journal articles with Malaysian addresses for the subject area "Physics" and other sub-discipline of physics were retrieved from the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge database spanning the years 1980 to 2011. A scientometrics and social network analysis of the Malaysian physics field was conducted to examine the publication growth and distribution of domestic collaborative publications; the giant component analysis; and the degree, closeness, and betweenness centralisation scores for the domestic co-authorship networks. Using these methods, we are able to gain insights on the evolution of collaboration and scientometric dimensions of Malaysian research in physics over time. Addresses: [Tan, H. X.; Ujum, E. A.; Ratnavelu, K.] Univ Malaya, Fac Sci, Inst Math Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Cited Reference Count: 13 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, 2 HUNTINGTON QUADRANGLE, STE 1NO1, MELVILLE, NY 11747-4501 USA ISSN: 0094-243X ISBN: 978-0-7354-1220-0 Web of Science Categories: Physics, Applied Research Areas: Physics IDS Number: BA8IE Unique ID: WOS:000338131900036 Cited References: Adams J., 2013, Exploring the global research and innovation impact of Brazil, Russia, India, China And South Korea, Fatt Choong Kwai, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V85, P849 Bastian M., 2009, International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOCIAL NETWORKS, V1, P215 The Ministry of Higher Education, National Higher Education Strategic Plan, Burt Ronald S, 2005, Brokerage and Closure., Price D., 1963, Little science, big science, European Physical Society, 2012, Executive Summary of The Importance of Physics to the Economies of Europe, Economic Planning Unit, Sixth Malaysia Plan, 1990-1995, Newman MEJ, 2001, PHYSICAL REVIEW E, V64, Economic Planning Unit, Fifth Malaysia Plan, 1986-1990, Institute of Physics, 2012, The Importance of Physics to the UK Economy, Economic Planning Unit, Seventh Malaysia Plan, 1996-2000, =================================================================== Title: Analysis of the Relationship between Patent Litigation and Citation: Subdivision of Citations Authors: Lim, J Author Full Names: Lim, Jiyoun Source: APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 8 (5):2515-2522; SEP 2014 Language: English Document Type: Article Author Keywords: Patent litigation, patent citation, indirect citation, latent citation Abstract: Recent examples of patent litigation show the evidence of firms strategic patent use. Thus forecasting patent litigation becomes a greater priority. Patent citations have been prevalent in its usage in analyzing business environment as diverse patent indicators or a tool to predict patent litigation. However, most previous research has considered only direct patent citations. In order to overcome the limitation, this study analyzes patent litigation quantitatively through three kinds of patent citations: direct, indirect and latent citation, and empirically analyzed the relationship between these citations and patent litigation between plaintiff and defendant firms based on U. S. patent documents and patent litigation information. Consequently, this study found that the indirect citation is more by 7% than direct citations to patent litigation. In addition, latent citation is 8% higher in frequency compared with the number of litigations in in/direct citation relationship. Therefore, these results indicate that various approach for patent citation can provide more information for forecasting patent litigation. Addresses: ETRI, SW Contents Future Res Team, Taejon 305700, South Korea. E-mail Addresses: kusses at etri.re.kr Cited Reference Count: 30 Times Cited: 0 Publisher: NATURAL SCIENCES PUBLISHING CORP-NSP, 19 W 34 ST, SUITE 1018, NEW YORK, NY 10001 USA ISSN: 2325-0399 Web of Science Categories: Mathematics, Applied; Physics, Mathematical Research Areas: Mathematics; Physics IDS Number: AK0RV Unique ID: WOS:000338123400049 Cited References: Lai Yi-Hsuan, 2009, JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V26, P167 Wartburg I.V., 2005, Research Policy, V34, P1591 Atallah Gamal, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V67, P437 Fort G., 2006, Patent Strategy & Management, V7, US. Department of Commerce, 1998, The New Innovations Global Patenting Trends in Five Sectors, Ernst H, 1998, JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V15, P279 Pegels CC, 1996, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, V43, P246 [Anonymous], 2010, The Economist, Lanjouw JO, 2001, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSConference on Patent Systems and Innovation, JAN, 1999, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, V32, P129 The Economist, 2011, The Econo-mist, [Anonymous], 2010, The Economist, Cockburn M., 2006, NBER Working Paper, V12563, Karki M.M.S., 1997, World patent Information, V19, P269 TRAJTENBERG M, 1990, RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, V21, P172 Duguet E., 2005, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, V14, P375 Kim A.G., 2002, IEEE Systems and Information Design Symposium, USA, Somaya D, 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, V24, P17 Thomas Robert E., 2006, AMERICAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL, V43, P689 Lanjouw J.O., 1997, NBER Working paper, 6297, Cremers K., 2004, Discussion Paper, No. 04-72, Liu SJ, 1997, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, V13, P661 McDonough III J.F., 2006, Emory Law Journal, V56, P189 Wang Shyh-Jen, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V71, P509 Blind K, 2006, RESEARCH POLICY2nd ZEW Conference on the Economics of Innovation and Patents, SEP 19-20, 2005, Mannheim, GERMANY, V35, P655 Rantanen J., 2006, Santa Clara Computer and High - Technology Law Journal, V23, USPTO, 2011, [No title captured], Hirschey M., 2001, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, V9, P65 Marco A. C., 2005, Review of Financial Economics, V14, P323 Bessen J., 2005, Lewis & Clark Law Review, V9, P1 Harhoff D, 2003, RESEARCH POLICY, V32, P1343 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From krpowel at EMORY.EDU Thu Jul 31 16:42:54 2014 From: krpowel at EMORY.EDU (Powell, Kimberly Robin) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:42:54 +0000 Subject: Reminder: ASIS&T Sig/Met Student Paper contest Message-ID: Signal Boost From: Sigmet-officers [mailto:sigmet-officers-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Powell, Kimberly Robin Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 4:49 PM To: sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org; sigmetrics at listserv.utk.edu Subject: [Sigmet-officers] ASIS&T Sig/Met Student Paper contest Hello. Please find attached and below the 2014 Call for Student Papers from ASIS&T SIG/MET. Please excuse any cross postings and feel free to distribute widely. Please direct any questions regarding the contest or submission guidelines to Kim Powell at krpowel at emory.edu 2014 ASIS&T SIG/MET Student Paper Contest Are you tired of preparing papers which immediately migrate into your professors' files and have not been seen ever since? Recover your papers and give them a life and a great opportunity for yourself. Send your most promising papers to the 2014 ASIST SIG/MET Student paper contest where you have the chance to present your work in front of an interested audience, discuss it with established researchers, and win the ASIS&T SIG/MET Student Paper Award. This is the fourth annual student paper contest for SIG/MET, the Special Interest Group for the measurement of information production and use (http://www.asis.org/SIG/met.html)of the Association for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T). The contest is designed to recognize promising student research relating to the measurement of information, publication, and research and gives students a forum to meet the leaders of the field. Purpose SIG/MET seeks to encourage the development and networking opportunities of all those interested in the measurement of information. It is holding this contest to foster student growth and promote the generation of new ideas and research in metric-related topics, including bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, altmetrics and other related domains. Eligibility The first author of the paper entered into this contest must be a full-time student at the time of submission, irrespective of ASIS&T or SIG/MET membership. Only solo or first authored student manuscripts will be accepted, in order to ensure that the student made significant contributions to the work. SIG/MET reserves the right to request proof of enrollment as part of the submission and evaluation process. Submissions should not have been published work, although they may be submitted to a journal at the time of submission to the contest. Theme Papers should discuss theories, methods, policies, case studies, etc. on aspects of the measurement of information production and use. Topics could include, but are not limited to, the following core areas: * Metric-Related Theory * Methods and new techniques * Citation and co-citation analysis * Indicators * Web metrics * Information visualization * Research policy * Productivity * Journals, databases and electronic publications * Collaboration/Co-authorship * Patent analysis * Knowledge and topic diffusion * Altmetrics Selection Papers will be reviewed by SIG/MET officers and advisors to the SIG/MET workshop. At least one winner will be chosen. In the past, we have also given commendation to other particularly outstanding papers. Selection criteria include those that would be considered in traditional peer review: that is, the quality of the research, the presentation of the results, and the originality of the research question. Prizes The winner will be awarded a one-year individual membership to ASIS&T and a cash prize, sponsored by Elsevier. If of sufficient merit and pending available funds, two winners may be announced: one for the best first-authored paper and one for the best sole-authored paper. Authors of highly rated papers will be invited to submit a short biographical piece to be featured on the SIG/MET website. In addition, these authors may be invited to present their research under their own expense at the SIG/MET pre-conference workshop at the 2014 Annual ASIS&T Meeting. Format Submissions can be of any length and format, but should ideally reflect typical standards of a journal article (i.e., approximately 6,000 words and in an appropriate citation style for the social sciences). Submission & Deadline Authors are invited to submit manuscripts by midnight EST on Wednesday, August 13 2014, to the following website: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=sigmetspc2014 The students will be notified about the results by September 1, 2014. For inquiries and further information please contact Kim Powell (krpowel at emory.edu). SIGMET, a Special Interest Group for the measurement of information production and use of the Association for Information Science & Technology. It is designed to foster student research in metric-related topics: bibliometrics, scientometrics, atlmetrics, etc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: