Research Community Interests and the Publishing Lobby's Latest Trojan Horse (CHORUS)
dwojick at CRAIGELLACHIE.US
Tue Jul 23 08:06:49 EDT 2013
What Federal system design arguments have I not responded to? It is not an ad hominem to point out that the Federal policy is not anti-publisher, as many OA advocates are. It is an important fact about the policy. I have to be repetitive because Harnad is presenting the same non-design arguments over and over. Arguments such as that publishers cannot be trusted, access should be immediate via institutional repositories, delayed access is not open access, etc. My response does not vary.
On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Cristóbal Palmer <cmp at CMPALMER.ORG> wrote:
> Adminstrative info for SIGMETRICS (for example unsubscribe):
> On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 7:05 AM, David Wojick wrote:
>> Your personal dislike of publishers is not a system design argument, nor is it Federal policy.
> Your personal inability to stay focused on the arguments presented and reliance instead on ad hominem plus repetition isn't a system design argument either.
> Cristóbal Palmer
More information about the SIGMETRICS