Papers related to SIG-Metrics
Eugene Garfield
eugene.garfield at THOMSONREUTERS.COM
Thu Feb 16 16:07:43 EST 2012
Title: Neotropical Ichthyology: trajectory and bibliometric *index* (2003-2010)
Authors: Stumpf, IRC; Vanz, SAD; Gastaud, N; Vargas, R; Bentancourt, SMP
Author Full Names: Chitto Stumpf, Ida Regina; de Souza Vanz, Samile Andrea; Gastaud, Natalia; Vargas, Rosely; Puentes Bentancourt, Silvia Maria
Source: NEOTROPICAL ICHTHYOLOGY, 9 (4):921-926; DEC 26 2011
Language: English
Document Type: Article
Author Keywords: Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Co-authorship; Impact factor; Scientific journal
KeyWords Plus: SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP; COLLABORATION
Abstract:
The Neotropical Ichthyology jour nal was created in 2003 and soon became one of the main publications in its field as it is reflected in the number of articles submitted every year and the fact that it has been indexed by both SciELO and ISI. In order to understand the reasons for its trajectory, the journal history was recovered and bibliometric indices on author, citation and *impact factor* were mapped for the period between 2003 and 2010. A descriptive study on journal information source and a bibliometric study of the 388 articles published by the journal and the 642 articles that cite it have been carried out. Bibliometric analyses showed that 75.8% of the articles had been written by Brazilian authors and 91.3% had been published in collaboration. The journal was cited by 171 different publications from 28 countries, including renowned journals in the field. Self-citation accounted for 26.8% of journal citation. Analyses have been able to show that strict evaluation co!ntrol and editing of the articles have contributed towards its success and internationalization.
Reprint Address:
Stumpf, IRC (reprint author), Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Bibliotecon & Comunicacao, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2705,Sala 214, BR-90035007 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Addresses:
[Chitto Stumpf, Ida Regina; de Souza Vanz, Samile Andrea; Gastaud, Natalia; Vargas, Rosely; Puentes Bentancourt, Silvia Maria] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Bibliotecon & Comunicacao, BR-90035007 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
E-mail Address: samilevanz at terra.com.br<mailto:samilevanz at terra.com.br>
Cited Reference Count: 13
Publisher:
SOC BRASILEIRA ICTIOLOGIA, UNIV SAO PAULO, DEPT FISIOLOGIA-IB, RUA DO MATAO, TRAVESSA 14 N 321, SAO PAULO, SP 05508-900, BRAZIL
ISSN: 1679-6225
Subject Category: Zoology
IDS Number: 875XQ
Unique ID: WOS:000299068900025
Cited References:
GLANZEL W, 2004, HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI, P257 MALABARBA LR, 2006, B SOC BRASILEIRA ICT, V82, P9 Katz JS, 1997, RESEARCH POLICY, V26, P1 Persson O, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V60, P421 BEAVER DD, 1979, SCIENTOMETRICS, V1, P133 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 LUUKKONEN T, 1992, SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, V17, P101 MALABARBA LR, 2002, B SOC BRASILEIRA ICT, V69, P3 Glanzel W, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V51, P69 MEADOWS AJ, 1999, COMMUNICATING RES, BEAVER DD, 1978, SCIENTOMETRICS, V1, P65 VANZ SAS, 2009, THESIS U FEDERAL RIO, Packer AL, 2006, ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, V78, P841
========================================================================
Title: Nine criteria for a measure of *scientific* *output*
Authors: Kreiman, G; Maunsell, JHR
Author Full Names: Kreiman, Gabriel; Maunsell, John H. R.
Source: FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 5 10.3389/fncom.2011.00048 NOV 10 2011
Language: English
Document Type: Article
Author Keywords: impact factors; peer review; productivity; scientific output; citation; bibliometric analysis; quality versus quantity; impact
KeyWords Plus: JOURNALS IMPACT FACTOR; PAPER
Abstract:
Scientific research produces new knowledge, technologies, and clinical treatments that can lead to enormous returns. Often, the path from basic research to new paradigms and direct impact on society takes time. Precise quantification of scientific output in the short-term is not an easy task but is critical for evaluating scientists, laboratories, departments, and institutions. While there have been attempts to quantifying scientific output, we argue that current methods are not ideal and suffer from solvable difficulties. Here we propose criteria that a metric should have to be considered a good index of scientific output. Specifically, we argue that such an index should be quantitative, based on robust data, rapidly updated and retrospective, presented with confidence intervals, normalized by number of contributors, career stage and discipline, impractical to manipulate, and focused on quality over quantity. Such an index should be validated through empirical testing. The purpose of quantitatively evaluating scientific output is not to replace careful, rigorous review by experts but rather to complement those efforts. Because it has the potential to greatly influence the efficiency of scientific research, we have a duty to reflect upon and implement novel and rigorous ways of evaluating scientific output. The criteria proposed here provide initial steps toward the systematic development and validation of a metric to evaluate scientific output.
Reprint Address:
Kreiman, G (reprint author), Harvard Univ, Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 1 Blackfan Circle,Karp 11217, Boston, MA 02115 USA
Addresses:
[Kreiman, Gabriel] Harvard Univ, Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02115 USA [Kreiman, Gabriel] Harvard Univ, Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02115 USA [Maunsell, John H. R.] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurobiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
E-mail Address: gabriel.kreiman at tch.harvard.edu<mailto:gabriel.kreiman at tch.harvard.edu>
Cited Reference Count: 23
Publisher:
FRONTIERS RES FOUND, PO BOX 110, LAUSANNE, 1015, SWITZERLAND
ISSN: 1662-5188
Article Number: 48
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00048
Subject Category: Mathematical & Computational Biology; Neurosciences & Neurology
IDS Number: 882ML
Unique ID: WOS:000299567700002
Cited References:
Hecht F, 1998, CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, V104, P77 GRIFFITH BC, 1986, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, V37, P261 Skorka P, 2003, NATURE, V425, P661 Garfield E, 2006, JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, V295, P90 Hughes ME, 2010, SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, V2, Dimitrov JD, 2010, NATURE, V466, P179 Castelnuovo G, 2008, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, V336, P789 Bollen J, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, 2006, PLOS MED, V3, PE291 GREENE D, 2009, UCDCSI200903, AMIN M, 2000, PERSPECTIVES PUBLISH, V1, P1 Mandavilli A, 2011, NATURE, V469, P286 Simons K, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P165 Fersht A, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V106, P6883 Sala SD, 2008, CORTEX, V44, P1139 Alberts B, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P15 Hirsch JE, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V102, P16569 Enserink M, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P1662 Petsko GA, 2008, GENOME BIOLOGY, V9, Siegel D, 2010, SCIENCE, V329, P1466 Della Sala S, 2006, CORTEX, V42, P1 Refinetti R, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P29 Jemec GBE, 2001, LANCET, V358, P1373
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20120216/eff10ccc/attachment.html>
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list