A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences
Ping.Zhou at ECON.KULEUVEN.BE
Mon Feb 22 04:36:22 EST 2010
Title: A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences
Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, forthcoming
Authors: Ping Zhou, Xinning Su, Loet Leydesdorff
Abstract: We argue that the communication structures in the Chinese social sciences have not yet been sufficiently reformed. Citation patterns among Chinese domestic journals in three subject areas-political science and marxism, library and information science, and economics-are compared with their counterparts internationally. Like their colleagues in the natural and life sciences, Chinese scholars in the social sciences provide fewer references to journal publications than their international counterparts; like their international colleagues, social scientists provide fewer references than natural sciences. The resulting citation networks, therefore, are sparse. Nevertheless, the citation structures clearly suggest that the Chinese social sciences are far less specialized in terms of disciplinary delineations than their international counterparts. Marxism studies are more established than political science in China. In terms of the impact of the Chinese political system on academic fields, disciplines closely related to the political system are less specialized than those weakly related. In the discussion section, we explore reasons that may cause the current stagnation and provide policy recommendations.
More information about the SIGMETRICS