Jefferson, T; et al Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 338: Art. No. b354 FEB 12 2009

Eugene Garfield garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Tue Mar 31 12:01:59 EDT 2009


E-mail Address: jefferson.tom at gmail.com 

Author(s): Jefferson, T (Jefferson, T.); Di Pietrantonj, C (Di 
Pietrantonj, C.); Debalini, MG (Debalini, M. G.); Rivetti, A (Rivetti, 
A.); Demicheli, V (Demicheli, V.) 

Title: Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, 
and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review 

Source: BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 338: Art. No. b354 FEB 12 2009 

Language: English 

Document Type: Review 

KeyWords Plus: INFORMATION-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST; 
ELDERLY-PEOPLE; DRUG TRIALS; VACCINATION; ASSOCIATION; CARE; CONCLUSIONS; 
MORTALITY; BENEFITS 

Abstract: Objective To explore the relation between study concordance, 
take home message, funding, and dissemination of comparative studies 
assessing the effects of influenza vaccines.
Design Systematic review without meta-analysis.
Data extraction Search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and the 
web, without language restriction, for any studies comparing the effects 
of influenza vaccines against placebo or no intervention. Abstraction and 
assessment of quality of methods were carried out.
Data synthesis We identified 259 primary studies ( 274 datasets). Higher 
quality studies were significantly more likely to show concordance between 
data presented and conclusions (odds ratio 16.35, 95% confidence interval 
4.24 to 63.04) and less likely to favour effectiveness of vaccines (0.04, 
0.02 to 0.09). Government funded studies were less likely to have 
conclusions favouring the vaccines (0.45, 0.26 to 0.90). A higher mean 
journal impact factor was associated with complete or partial industry 
funding compared with government or private funding and no funding 
(differences between means 5.04). Study size was not associated with 
concordance, content of take home message, funding, and study quality. 
Higher citation index factor was associated with partial or complete 
industry funding. This was sensitive to the exclusion from the analysis of 
studies with undeclared funding.
Conclusion Publication in prestigious journals is associated with partial 
or total industry funding, and this association is not explained by study 
quality or size. 

Addresses: [Jefferson, T.; Di Pietrantonj, C.; Debalini, M. G.; Rivetti, 
A.; Demicheli, V.] ASL AL 20, Cochrane Vaccines Field, I-15100 
Alessandria, Italy 

Reprint Address: Jefferson, T, ASL AL 20, Cochrane Vaccines Field, I-15100 
Alessandria, Italy.
 
E-mail Address: jefferson.tom at gmail.com 

Funding Acknowledgement:  

Funding Agency Grant Number 

ASL AL, Alessandria, Piemonte, Italy    
 
This study was funded by ASL AL, Alessandria, Piemonte, Italy. The funding 
source had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and 
interpretation of results, in the writing of the report, or in the 
decision to submit the paper for publication.
 
Cited Reference Count: 33 

Times Cited: 0 

Publisher: B M J PUBLISHING GROUP 

Publisher Address: BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE, TAVISTOCK SQUARE, LONDON WC1H 
9JR, ENGLAND 

ISSN: 0959-8146 

DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b354 

29-char Source Abbrev.: BRIT MED J 

ISO Source Abbrev.: Br. Med. J. 

Source Item Page Count: 7 

Subject Category: Medicine, General & Internal 

ISI Document Delivery No.: 415ZY 

ALPER BS
How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for 
primary care? 
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 92 : 429 2004 

ALSNIELSEN B
12 INT COCHR COLL OT 2004 88 

ALSNIELSEN B
Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials - A 
reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 290 : 921 2003 

BEKELMAN JE
Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical 
research - A systematic review 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 289 : 454 2003 

BERO LA
SPONSORED SYMPOSIA ON ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 271 : 612 1994 

CARMAN WF
Effects of influenza vaccination of health-care workers on mortality of 
elderly people in long-term care: a randomised controlled trial 
LANCET 355 : 93 2000 

DAVIES K
The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidence 
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL 24 : 78 2007 

DAWES M
Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of 
information seeking behavior in physicians 
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS 71 : 9 DOI 10.1016/S1386-5056
(03)00023-6 2003 

ELY JW
Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 319 : 358 1999 

EURICH DT
Mortality reduction with influenza vaccine in patients with pneumonia 
outside "Flu" season - Pleiotropic benefits or residual confounding? 
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 178 : 527 DOI 
10.1164/rccm.200802-282OC 2008 

FRIEDMAN LS
Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results 
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 19 : 51 2004 

GARFIELD E
Journal impact factor: a brief review 
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 161 : 979 1999 

GARFIELD E
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 295 : 90 2006 

HIGGINS JPT
COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA : 2008 

JACKSON LA
Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in 
seniors 
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY 35 : 337 DOI 10.1093/ije/dyi274 2006 

JEFFERSON T
Public health - Influenza vaccination: policy versus evidence 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 333 : 912 DOI 10.1136/bmj.38995.531701.80 2006 

JORDAN R
Universal vaccination of children against influenza: Are there indirect 
benefits to the community? A systematic review of the evidence 
VACCINE 24 : 1047 DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.09.017 2006 

KJAERGARD LL
Association between competing interests and authors' conclusions: 
epidemiological study of ramdomised clinical trials published in the BMJ 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325 : 249 2002 

LEOPOLD SS
Association between funding source and study outcome in orthopaedic 
research 
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH : 293 DOI 
10.1097/01.blo.0000093888.12372.d9 2003 

LEXCHIN J
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: 
systematic review 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326 : 1167 2003 

MOHER D
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of 
intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? 
LANCET 352 : 609 1998 

SAINT S
Journal reading habits of internists 
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 15 : 881 2000 

SCHULZ KF
EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE OF BIAS - DIMENSIONS OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY 
ASSOCIATED WITH ESTIMATES OF TREATMENT EFFECTS IN CONTROLLED TRIALS 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 273 : 408 1995 

SIMONSEN L
Mortality benefits of influenza vaccination in elderly people: an ongoing 
controversy 
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES 7 : 658 2007 

STELFOX HT
Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists 
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 338 : 101 1998 

TENOPIR C
Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians 
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 95 : 56 2007 

THOMAS RE
COCHRANE DB SYST REV 3 : UNSP CD005187 2006 

WELLS GA
NEWCASTLE OTTAWA SCA : 2005 

WILDE JA
Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals - A 
randomized trial 
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 281 : 908 1999 

WONGSURAKIAT P
Acute respiratory illness in patients with COPD and the effectiveness of 
influenza vaccination - A randomized controlled study 
CHEST 125 : 2011 2004 

WOOD L
14 COCHR C OCT 23 26 2006 

YANK V
Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-
analyses: retrospective cohort study 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 335 : 1202 DOI 10.1136/bmj.39376.447211.BE 2007 

YAPHE J
The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome 
in randomized controlled drug trials 
FAMILY PRACTICE 18 : 565 2001 



More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list