Another Winning Article From OA's Chronicler and Conscience: Richard Poynder
David E. Wojick
dwojick at HUGHES.NET
Wed Mar 11 12:32:23 EDT 2009
It is a nice summary, albeit somewhat anti-business. However on the
metrics side I am puzzled by his estimate that only 15% of authors
voluntarily self-archive via personal webpages, institutional
repositories and community eprint databases. We did a quick study in
physics and found more like 60-80% just for author webpages, so
either he is seriously wrong or he is including areas that may not
archive. Who might they be? The high ratio we found is what makes our
E-print Network viable http://www.osti.gov/eprints/. We harvest
30,000 webpages and databases.
Any information on his 15% number? If we are right then voluntary
green OA is a done deal in physics and related fields. We also see
these high numbers in computer science.
I don't know how he does it.
His <http://poynder.blogspot.com/>article is full of points with
which I profoundly disagree. But he has written it so fairly and so
insightfully and so stimulatingly that all one can do is admire it,
and him, yet again.
I may be writing a critical commentary shortly, but in the meantime,
all I can do is highly recommend it to everyone with any interest in
the exciting current developments in Open Access (OA). It will bring
you up to speed with the OA movement and also give you a shrewd and
penetrating peek at OA's possible future.
Agree or disagree, you cannot fail to be informed, and impressed. The
OA movement is fortunate indeed to have Richard Poynder as its
chronicler, conscience, and gadfly laureate.
Scientist Open Access Forum
"David E. Wojick, Ph.D., PE" <WojickD at osti.gov>
Senior Consultant for Innovation
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
US Department of Energy
391 Flickertail Lane, Star Tannery, VA 22654 USA
http://www.bydesign.com/powervision/resume.html provides my bio and
past client list.
presents some of my own research on information structure and
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SIGMETRICS